Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

46
Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14

Transcript of Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Page 1: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling

Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing

12-3-14

Page 2: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling

Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing

12-3-14

Page 4: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Clear the hurdle with the smallest decrease in horizontal velocity as possible

Skill Objectives

Page 5: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Height of athlete➢ stride length

❖ Height of hurdles

❖ Flexibility of athlete➢ specifically at the hip joint

Special Considerations

Page 6: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Keys to Successful Hurdling

❖ Spending as much time as possible sprinting

❖ Spending as little time in the air as possible (a perfected clearance technique)

(Pierre Beaulieu, 2012)

Page 7: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Raise just above the hurdle to allow for clearance

❖ Lean forward while clearing hurdle to minimize center of mass elevation➢ Leaning forward allows for

more aerodynamic posture

Center of Mass

(Pierre Beaulieu, 2012)

Page 8: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Minimize potential energy by reducing elevation❖ Maximize kinetic energy by spending as much time as possible

sprinting❖ Vertical height directly affects time❖ By keeping the center of mass low as possible the runner is able to

decrease time ❖ By lowering the center of mass less initial velocity is required to clear

the hurdle

Projectile Motion

(Pierre Beaulieu, 2012)

Page 9: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Momentum is lost when:❖ stutter-stepping occurs ❖ the hurdle is hit

*Hitting the hurdle is an inelastic collision

Momentum

Page 10: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Mono-articulating❖ Short head of Bicep Femoris❖ Vastus muscles❖ *Gluteus Maximus❖ *Tensor Fasciae Latae❖ Adductors❖ Soleus

Anatomy/ Function of Hurdling (Leg)

These muscles provide❖ Stability and leverage❖ Force & work generators❖ Lose tension in quick movements

Page 11: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Bi-articulating❖ Psoas Major❖ Hamstrings❖ Bicep Femoris❖ Semimembranosus❖ Semitendinosus❖ Rectus Femoris❖ Gracilis❖ Gastrocnemius

Anatomy/ Function of Hurdling (Leg)

These muscles provide❖ High speed movements❖ Saves energy by allowing concentric work to be done on one

end and eccentric on the other❖ Transfers energy while resisting moments across adjacent

joints (isometric function)❖ Effects timing of muscle activation on vertical jump

Page 12: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Phases

Page 13: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Take-off Phase❖ Flight Phase

➢ Splitting➢ Clearance➢ Landing Preparation

❖ Landing Phase

Hurdling Phases

Page 14: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Aggressive run at the hurdle❖ Stay of ball’s of feet

➢ allows for less braking effect which which would otherwise lead to slower horizontal velocity

❖ Avoid sinking center of mass❖ Shifting of lead leg, arms, and trunk must

be performed simultaneously

Take-off phase

Page 15: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Pelvic orientation❖ Minimizing loss in velocity❖ Athlete must maintain a high position of

center of mass during take-off❖ Lead knee is driven up

and at the hurdle

Take-off phase

Page 16: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Taking too long of a stride before take-off

❖ Last stride is too close to the hurdle

❖ Lead leg is brought out to the side

Biomechanical errors

Page 17: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Three different phases➢ Splitting phase➢ Clearance phase➢ Landing Preparation

*The key to this phase is spending as little time as possible in the air

Flight Phase

Page 18: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Hurdler assumes split position❖ Opposite arm reaches for opposite leg

Splitting Phase

Page 19: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Keep center of mass as low as possible➢ Leaning forward allows for easier movement of

the trail leg❖ Keeping vertical velocity low

allows for less time in the air

Clearance Phase

Page 20: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Vertical velocity is too high

❖ Trail leg is not brought high enough or is brought under the body

Biomechanical Errors

Page 21: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ The main characteristic is the opposed movement behavior of trail and lead leg

❖ Forward trunk lean is kept to continue momentum

Landing Preparation

Page 22: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Shoulders are not lined up with hips

Biomechanical Errors

Page 23: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Landing in plantar flexion of the lead leg allows for minimal loss in horizontal velocity

❖ High knee rotation allows for better clearance of the hurdle

Landing Phase

Page 24: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gveS_0sFOmw&list=PLYhTif3-2kJBBTLd4fC7QL3uIiAWsvvzH&index=34

Pierre Beaulieu, H. O. (2012). Blood lactate levels of decathletes during competition. Education Physique of Sports, University of Bordeaux , France, 146-157.

McLean, B. (2011). THE BIOMECHANICS OF HURDLING: FORCE PLATE ANALYSIS TO ASSESS HURDLING TECHNIQUE. Australian Institute of Sport, Belconnen, Canberra, Australia, 333-335.

Coh, M., & Iskra, J. (2012). Biomechanical Studies of 110 M Hurdle Clearance Technique. Sport Science, Faculty of Education-University of Travnik, Bosnia, & Herzegovina, 10-13.

Coh, M. (2003). Biomechanical analysis of Colin Jackson's hurdle clearance technique. New studies in athletics, 18(1), 37-45.

Coh, M., Milanovic, D., & Kampmiller, T. (2011). Morphologic and Kinematic Characteristics of Elite Sprinters. Original Scientific Paper, 605-610

References

Page 26: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Clear the hurdle with the smallest decrease in horizontal velocity as possible

Skill Objectives

Page 27: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Height of athlete➢ stride length

❖ Height of hurdles

❖ Flexibility of athlete➢ specifically at the hip joint

Special Considerations

Page 28: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Keys to Successful Hurdling

❖ Spending as much time as possible sprinting

❖ Spending as little time in the air as possible (a perfected clearance technique)

(Pierre Beaulieu, 2012)

Page 29: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Raise just above the hurdle to allow for clearance

❖ Lean forward while clearing hurdle to minimize center of mass elevation➢ Leaning forward allows for

more aerodynamic posture

Center of Mass

(Pierre Beaulieu, 2012)

Page 30: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Minimize potential energy by reducing elevation❖ Maximize kinetic energy by spending as much time as possible

sprinting❖ Vertical height directly affects time❖ By keeping the center of mass low as possible the runner is able to

decrease time ❖ By lowering the center of mass less initial velocity is required to clear

the hurdle

Projectile Motion

(Pierre Beaulieu, 2012)

Page 31: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Momentum is lost when:❖ stutter-stepping occurs ❖ the hurdle is hit

*Hitting the hurdle is an inelastic collision

Momentum

Page 32: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Mono-articulating❖ Short head of Bicep Femoris❖ Vastus muscles❖ *Gluteus Maximus❖ *Tensor Fasciae Latae❖ Adductors❖ Soleus

Anatomy/ Function of Hurdling (Leg)

These muscles provide❖ Stability and leverage❖ Force & work generators❖ Lose tension in quick movements

Page 33: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Bi-articulating❖ Psoas Major❖ Hamstrings❖ Bicep Femoris❖ Semimembranosus❖ Semitendinosus❖ Rectus Femoris❖ Gracilis❖ Gastrocnemius

Anatomy/ Function of Hurdling (Leg)

These muscles provide❖ High speed movements❖ Saves energy by allowing concentric work to be done on one

end and eccentric on the other❖ Transfers energy while resisting moments across adjacent

joints (isometric function)❖ Effects timing of muscle activation on vertical jump

Page 34: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

Phases

Page 35: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Take-off Phase❖ Flight Phase

➢ Splitting➢ Clearance➢ Landing Preparation

❖ Landing Phase

Hurdling Phases

Page 36: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Aggressive run at the hurdle❖ Stay of ball’s of feet

➢ allows for less braking effect which which would otherwise lead to slower horizontal velocity

❖ Avoid sinking center of mass❖ Shifting of lead leg, arms, and trunk must

be performed simultaneously

Take-off phase

Page 37: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Pelvic orientation❖ Minimizing loss in velocity❖ Athlete must maintain a high position of

center of mass during take-off❖ Lead knee is driven up

and at the hurdle

Take-off phase

Page 38: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Taking too long of a stride before take-off

❖ Last stride is too close to the hurdle

❖ Lead leg is brought out to the side

Biomechanical errors

Page 39: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Three different phases➢ Splitting phase➢ Clearance phase➢ Landing Preparation

*The key to this phase is spending as little time as possible in the air

Flight Phase

Page 40: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Hurdler assumes split position❖ Opposite arm reaches for opposite leg

Splitting Phase

Page 41: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Keep center of mass as low as possible➢ Leaning forward allows for easier movement of

the trail leg❖ Keeping vertical velocity low

allows for less time in the air

Clearance Phase

Page 42: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Vertical velocity is too high

❖ Trail leg is not brought high enough or is brought under the body

Biomechanical Errors

Page 43: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ The main characteristic is the opposed movement behavior of trail and lead leg

❖ Forward trunk lean is kept to continue momentum

Landing Preparation

Page 44: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Shoulders are not lined up with hips

Biomechanical Errors

Page 45: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

❖ Landing in plantar flexion of the lead leg allows for minimal loss in horizontal velocity

❖ High knee rotation allows for better clearance of the hurdle

Landing Phase

Page 46: Biomechanical Analysis of Hurdling Kale Hintz, Ericka Fischer, Jenny Suing 12-3-14.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gveS_0sFOmw&list=PLYhTif3-2kJBBTLd4fC7QL3uIiAWsvvzH&index=34

Pierre Beaulieu, H. O. (2012). Blood lactate levels of decathletes during competition. Education Physique of Sports, University of Bordeaux , France, 146-157.

McLean, B. (2011). THE BIOMECHANICS OF HURDLING: FORCE PLATE ANALYSIS TO ASSESS HURDLING TECHNIQUE. Australian Institute of Sport, Belconnen, Canberra, Australia, 333-335.

Coh, M., & Iskra, J. (2012). Biomechanical Studies of 110 M Hurdle Clearance Technique. Sport Science, Faculty of Education-University of Travnik, Bosnia, & Herzegovina, 10-13.

Coh, M. (2003). Biomechanical analysis of Colin Jackson's hurdle clearance technique. New studies in athletics, 18(1), 37-45.

Coh, M., Milanovic, D., & Kampmiller, T. (2011). Morphologic and Kinematic Characteristics of Elite Sprinters. Original Scientific Paper, 605-610

References