Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September,...

26
Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002

Transcript of Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September,...

Page 1: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Biomass Challenges for Federal AgenciesPresented to the Renewable Energy Working Group

September, 2002

Page 2: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Existing and Pending Biomass Use in Agencies

• Fort Stewart, GA

• Hampton Roads, VA

• Bio-Diesel for Transportation

• E-85 for Transportation

• Gasohol for Transportation

• McMurdo Sound

• NASA and LFG

Page 3: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Three Approaches

• Build Projects that Use Biomass Energy

• Buy Green Power that Uses Biomass Energy

• Facilitate the Use or Development of Biomass on Federal Lands or Through Federal Programs

Page 4: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Bioenergy Technologies

• Electric or thermal - solid fuel or gasification

– Small-scale systems, distributed generation

– Large scale generation or cogeneration

– Co-firing (biomass and coal or natural gas)

• Liquid Biofuels

– Ethanol, methanol, bio-oil, bio-diesel

• Chemicals and biobased products

Page 5: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Biomass Fuel

Flexibility

• Fuel can be stored, unlike wind or solar, therefore:

– Biomass can be dispatched when needed

– Biomass plants can have high capacity factors

• Biomass can be:

– substituted for natural gas,

– blended with conventional fuels – biodiesel and ethanol

– blended with coal

Page 6: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Applications for

Bioenergy

• Small-scale power or cogeneration systems

• Large-scale biomass generating plants

– Combined heat and power

– Stand-alone power plants (usually 20 MW or larger)

• Wood heating at small facilities

– schools, hospitals, housing

• Co-fire in industrial or utility boilers

• Liquid fuels, specialty chemicals

• Green power purchases

Page 7: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Microgeneration – Performance

15 kWe gasifier/engine

55 kWe gasifier/engine

280 kWe gasifier/engine

Capacity (kWe) 15 55 280

Thermal (kWth) ? 120 600

Company CPC, USA Xylowatt Xylowatt

Yrs in business 7 7 7

Number of units 3 built, 7 coming 10 demos 10 demos

Status Demo Demo/Com Demo/Com

Biomass GT/yr

(12 h/day; 50% MC, 4000 Btu/lb)

100-200 400 2000

Footprint 10 x 6 x 7 ? ?

Installed cost ($) $150,000 (full demo costs)

$300,000 $800,000

Page 8: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Community Power Corp - Biomax15

Page 9: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.
Page 10: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Xylowatt SA (Swiss)

55 kW electric

120 kW thermal

450 tons/year fuel

Page 11: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.
Page 12: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Facility Heating System Performance

Wood furnace Wood gasifier/burner Wood gasifier/burner

Thermal capacity

0.03 – 1 MWth(115k – 1 MMBtu/hr)

0.1 - 3 MWth (.5 – 14 MMBtu/hr)

0.6 – 12 MWth (2 – 40 MMBtu/hr)

Company Taylor Waterstoves Chiptec Converta Kiln

Installed cost $4,500 - $65,000 $30,000 – $275,000 (gasifier only)

??

Status Commercial Commercial Commercial

Years in business

Not Known 16 Not known

Biomass use (GT/year)

50 – 3,000 330 – 10,000 2,000 – 40,000

# systems in operation

1000s >125 in NA 300-400

Note: Biomass use estimates assume 0.90 capacity, 33,475 Btu-h/boiler hp, and 4,000 Btu/wet lb biomass heat content

Page 13: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Chiptec Systems, Vermont

• Heat only or CHP• 5 – 45% MC• Wide range of sizes• Turnkey systems• Co-gen (35 kW – 5 MW) • Automated fuel handling

Page 14: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Other Wood Heating System Manufacturers

• Messersmith Manufacturers (Michigan)

• Grove Wood Heating, Inc (Canada)

• Industrial Boiler Company (Georgia)

• KMW Energy Systems, Inc (Canada)

Page 15: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

CostComparisons: Biomass vs.Fossil Fuels

Category UnitsBiomass (McNeil Tech)

Biomass (EPRI /

FERCO)Coal

Co-Fire Coal /

Biomass

Natural Gas

Technology   Direct Fire Direct Fire Pulverized coal

Pulverized coal

Combined cycle

Capacity MW 20 50 300 100  

Installed Cost $/kw $2,200 $1,965 $1,195 $271 $500

Heat RateBtu/kWh 20,000 14,483 9,830 10,440 6,500

Capacity Factor % 90 80 80 80 80

Fuel Cost

$/MMBtu $2.24 $2.63 $0.77 N/A $2.85

Levelized Cost $/kWh $0.061 $0.075 $0.044 N/A $0.041

Page 16: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Facilitated Project

Potential

• Millions of tons of biomass will either fuel wildfires or be removed

• Agencies helping private sector use thinnings for energy would be significant for the Federal goal, and for U.S. bioenergy development

• USDA Forest Service and Interior are the 800 pound gorillas in this situation

• DoD, DOE and others with landholdings to manage have specific local opportunities

• DOES NOT HAVE TO BE CONSUMED BY THE AGENCY TO COUNT!

Page 17: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Current Situation

and Issues

• Fires continue to threaten communities

• Increased interest and debate over forest restoration

– mechanical treatment vs. prescribed burn

– diameter limits

– community defense only vs. landscape treatment

• Mitigation efforts are expensive, but not as costly as fires

• Market outlets for small diameter trees can help defer thinning costs

Page 18: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

USFS Example

• 46,000 acres targeted for mechanical thinning under National Fire Plan in 2001, just in Urban-Wildland Interface (UWI) and areas to reduce fire threats to communities

• Conservatively, could have supported 436 MW of biomass capacity and over 3000 GWh of generation

• Excludes acres with prescribed burns, or a combination of treatments

Page 19: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

BLM Example

• DRAFT NREL Assessment of RE Potential on Federal Lands, including biomass

• Used satellite data showing Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) above 4, proximity to communities at fire risk, population centers.

• Identified Planning Units in the Following States:

• Arizona• California• Colorado

• Montana• New Mexico• Oregon• Washington

Page 20: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Benefits of Bioenergy

• Biomass fuel prices generally stable

– hedge against fuel cost variability

• Biomass $ stay in state and local economies

• Rural economic development and job creation (CA = 5 jobs/MW capacity)

• Biomass fuel costs not subject to control of a single supplier

Page 21: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Benefits of Bioenergy

(con’t)

• Biomass is a baseload renewable resource

• Reduce SOx and fossil CO2 emissions

• Biomass systems are easy to convert to other fuels

• Outlet for forest health restoration activities

• Landfill diversion of urban wood wastes

Page 22: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Why Isn’t It Happening?

• Uncertainty

– Environmental opposition, distrust

– When, where, how much thinning, and how long must be known to develop supply curve

• Wildfire is overwhelming focus – not benefits of using thinnings

• Little coordination among agency, state and community plans and investments

• Small-scale technologies adaptable to supply uncertainty are just becoming commercial

• Interconnection , stand-by and buy-back rates

Page 23: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Electricity Sales: Breakeven Price

vs. Biomass Fuel

$0$5

$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45

$0.057 $0.063 $0.069 $0.076 $0.082 $0.088 $0.095

Dollars/kWh

Dolla

rs/D

ry T

on

Page 24: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Modest Proposals

• In contracts seek proposals for energy reuse of removed biomass and industry input on structure of requests for proposals

• Work in coordination with States, communities and environmentalists in promising areas to create reliable supply

• Support demonstrations of modular technologies that address supply issues

Page 25: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Interesting Projects

• USFS Supported Work with Nevada Tahoe Conservation District, small-scale system

• Pending CEC Project on Distributed Biomass Generation with Truckee-Donner PUD

• CEC-Funded Analysis of RE Distributed Generation and Public Benefits

• Four Corners sustainable forest partnership bioenergy project

• Front range biomass energy assessment

• Summit and Eagle county biomass energy assessment

• Yavapai Apache Feasibility Study

Page 26: Biomass Challenges for Federal Agencies Presented to the Renewable Energy Working Group September, 2002.

Contacts Scott HaaseMcNeil Technologies143 Union Blvd., Suite 900Lakewood, CO 80228Phone: 303-273-0071Fax: 303-273-0074Email:

[email protected]

Kevin DeGroatMcNeil Technologies6564 Loisdale Court, S-800Springfield, VA 22150Phone: 703-921-1632Fax: 703-921-1610Email:

[email protected] www.mcneiltech.com