Biofuel Policies of the United States

17
Biofuel Policies of the United States The Role of the Tax Credits for Biodiesel Marcel Adenäuer (Bonn University) Seth Meyer (FAO) Pierre Charlebois (Consultant)

description

Biofuel Policies of the United States. The Role of the Tax Credits for Biodiesel Marcel Adenäuer (Bonn University) Seth Meyer (FAO) Pierre Charlebois (Consultant). Facts regarding US biofuels. Ethanol production will require slightly more than 40% of American coarse grain production - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Biofuel Policies of the United States

Page 1: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

Biofuel Policies of the United States

The Role of the Tax Credits for BiodieselMarcel Adenäuer (Bonn University)

Seth Meyer (FAO)Pierre Charlebois (Consultant)

Page 2: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

Facts regarding US biofuels• Ethanol production will require slightly more than 40%

of American coarse grain production• But production of DDG returning in the feed market will

represent around 13% of the coarse grain production• The USA is expected to produce almost half of global

ethanol production• Their influence in the biodiesel market is much more

limited • But: Biodiesel counts as advanced biofuel

Page 3: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

US ethanol Mandates

RFS2 Baseline0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160Biodiesel CellulosicOther advanced Other conventional

bnl

2022

60 bnl 16 bnl

12 bnl 15 bnl

1.2 bnl

Page 4: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

Other support measures• Blender tax credit – expired for Ethanol

supposed to expire for Biodiesel in 2014

• State specific Level tax support

• Small ad valorem tariff on ethanol

• Low carbon fuel standard in California

Page 5: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

US biofuels in AGLINK/COSIMO• Global endogenous coverage of biofuels and

the model is policy specific for both biofuels• The different feedstocks used are also well

represented• DDGS are represented as returning to maize,

but in the new feed system (2014) they will compete with all feeding stuff (e.g. soybean meal)

Page 6: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

When the tax credit expires• For ethanol the knowledge of the expiring in

2013 led to a huge use of the rollover possibility. Parts of the 2013 RINS were produced already in 2012.

• Same thing is assumed to happen for biodiesel this year leading to a peak in biodiesel production

Page 7: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

Stochastic Analysis• 2 Scenarios – 500 draws on yields for Wheat, Maize, Rice and

Oilseeds from historic distribution as shocks to the model

• Scenario TAX1: – Blender’s tax credit for Biodiesel (27 $) only in 2013

(as in current legislation)• Scenario TAX2: – Blender’s tax credit for Biodiesel in 2013 - 2022

Page 8: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

• US biodiesel prices on average 13 $ higher in TAX2

• Distribution flatter in TAX2 –> less volatility in Tax1

• General: Higher upwards risk for prices than downwards

US biodiesel producer price distribution• Tax1 = tax credit only

in 2013• Tax2 = tax credit

2013-2022• mean: normal line• median: dotted line • q1/q3 percentiles:

dashed lines

Page 9: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

• Given the low importance of the USA on the biodiesel world market, the distributions of the world biodiesel price are less distinct. The tendency is the same as in the US, but on a lower level

World biodiesel price distribution• Tax1 = tax credit

only in 2013• Tax2 = tax credit

2013-2022• mean: normal

line• median: dotted

line • q1/q3

percentiles: dashed lines

Page 10: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

• Without the Tax credit, the biodiesel mandate is binding for many more draws than in TAX2

• Average consumption 0.8 bnl higher

US biodiesel consumption distribution• Tax1 = tax credit

only in 2013• Tax2 = tax credit

2013-2022• mean: normal

line• median: dotted

line • q1/q3

percentiles: dashed lines

Mandate

Page 11: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

US biodiesel consumption deviations

Page 12: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

US biodiesel devoted to the advanced mandate

Page 13: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

The other side of the medal: US Ethanol imports from Brazil

• About 1.1 bnl less imports necessary

• Tax1 = tax credit only in 2013• Tax2 = tax credit 2013-2022

Page 14: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

• The influence of higher biodiesel producer prices on the major biodiesel feed stock vegetable oil is smaller compare to biodiesel prices.

• Distributions less asymmetric

US vegetable oil producer price distribution• Tax1 = tax credit

only in 2013• Tax2 = tax credit

2013-2022• mean: normal

line• median: dotted

line • q1/q3

percentiles: dashed lines

Page 15: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

• The influence of higher biodiesel producer prices on soy beans is small.

• Almost no difference in both distributions

US soy bean producer price distribution• Tax1 = tax credit

only in 2013• Tax2 = tax credit

2013-2022• mean: normal

line• median: dotted

line • q1/q3

percentiles: dashed lines

Page 16: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

It’s vegetable oil imports that react

Page 17: Biofuel  Policies of  the United States

• The blender’s credit for biodiesel reduces the probability that the biodiesel mandate is binding considerably

• Effects on the vegetable oil market are comparable low

• Cross effects to US ethanol sector low but• Devotion of biodiesel to fill the other advanced

gap is higher => more competitive against Sugar cane based Ethanol from Brazil

Conclusions