Bioethics

33
Bioethics Dr. Vignesh Muthuvijayan Department of Biotechnology Ethics vs. Regulations Do you know the difference? Ethics Moral guidelines based on individual values Regulation Rules imposed by an external agency Examples of such agency relevant to Biotech? 2

description

Gen

Transcript of Bioethics

Page 1: Bioethics

Bioethics

Dr. Vignesh Muthuvijayan

Department of Biotechnology

Ethics vs. Regulations

• Do you know the difference?

• Ethics

– Moral guidelines based on individual values

• Regulation

– Rules imposed by an external agency

• Examples of such agency relevant to Biotech?

2

Page 2: Bioethics

What Will Not Talk About

• Agencies involved in policy making

• Regulations governing ethical debates

• These vary with countries and states

3

What is Bioethics?

• Study of ethical issues related to advances in biology and medicine

4

Page 3: Bioethics

Factors in Ethics/Bioethics

• Legal factors– Rules can guide what is right and wrong

• Organizational factors– Ethics of the leader

– Values imbibed through policies, publications, and speeches

• Individual factors– Moral development

– Personal values and personality

– Religious influences

– Family and peer influences

– Life experience

– Situational factors

5

Bioethical Issues

Can you think of some major issues grappling bioethics?

6

Page 4: Bioethics

Today’s Topics

• Medical care

– Abortion

– Physician-assisted suicide

– Prenatal genetic screening

• Biotech products

– GM food

• Biological research

– Informed consent

– Animal testing

– Embryonic stem cells

– Human reproductive cloning

– Human genetic enhancement

7

ABORTIONEthical issues in medical care

8

Page 5: Bioethics

Abortion

• Why is abortion a major ethical debate?

9

Abortion

Pro-choice Pro-life

10

Page 6: Bioethics

Abortion – Where People Stand?

11

Death of Savita Halappanavar

• Denied an abortion as the miscarried fetus had a heartbeat

• Died of bacterial infection, which likely caused miscarriage

• Became a major controversy

• Arulkumaran report

– inadequate assessment and monitoring

– failure to offer all management options to a patient

– non adherence to clinical guidelines related to the prompt and effective management of sepsis

12

Page 7: Bioethics

Arguments

• What are your pro-choice arguments?

• What are your pro-life arguments?

13

Arguments

Pro-choice

• No scientific consensus on when life starts

• Women have the right to control their body

• Government shouldn’t make medical decisions

Pro-life

• Murder of a human being

• A woman’s right to control her body doesn’t include right to kill another being

• Govt should protect the rights of the baby

14

Page 8: Bioethics

PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDEEthical issues in medical care

15

Euthanasia vs. Physician-Assisted Suicide

• Euthanasia– Physician takes an active role in carrying out patient’s

request

– Usually involves intravenous delivery of a lethal substance

• Physician-assisted suicide– Making lethal means available to the patient to be

used at a time of the patient’s own choosing

– Easier emotionally for the physician as he or she does not have to directly cause a death

16

Page 9: Bioethics

Hippocratic oath

• Expression of ideal conduct of a physician

• “refrain from doing harm”

• “give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel”

• Some version of this is undertaken by many medical students

• Used as an argument against euthanasia

17

Physician-Assisted Suicide

• Is it a violation of “refrain from doing harm” if PAS is for a terminally ill patient?

– Death could be a welcome relief

• Should PAS be sanctioned despite “give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel”?

• Is the Hippocratic oath even valid today?

– Isn’t a medical oath; you pledge allegiance to pagan Gods and Goddesses

– Was formulated by a group (in late 5th century BCE) that was opposed to PAS

18

Page 10: Bioethics

Physician-Assisted Suicide

19

Karen Ann Quinlan

• Consumed diazepam, dextropropoxyphene and alcohol during a crash diet

• Slipped into coma followed by persistent vegetative state

• Parents requested to disconnect Karen’s respirator

• Request was denied by doctors

20

Page 11: Bioethics

Karen Ann Quinlan

• Parents filed a case in 1975

• New Jersey Superior Court denied

• Parents appealed

• New Jersey Supreme Court granted in 1976

• Respirator was disconnected

• Karen continued to breathe

• Survived for 9 more years

• Died in 1985 of respiratory failure

21

Dr. Jack Kevorkian: Visionary or Villain?

• Pathologist who (allegedly) assisted suicides of over 130 patients with devices that he built

22

Page 12: Bioethics

Dr. Jack Kevorkian: Visionary or Villain?

• Monickered as “Dr. Death”

• “My aim was not to cause death, that’s crazy. My aim was to end suffering” (2008)

• Assisted suicide of Janet Adkins in 1990 using Thanatron

• Administered lethal injection to Thomas Youk on September 17, 1998

– Taped this and later broadcast it on national TV

• Convicted for 2nd degree murder

• Served over 8 years in prison

23

PAS Arguments

• What are your arguments supporting PAS?

• What are your arguments opposing PAS?

24

Page 13: Bioethics

PAS Arguments

Supporting

• Dying with dignity should be a fundamental freedom

• Pain and suffering can be minimized for patients, family and friends

• Healthcare costs reduced

Opposing

• Request for assisted suicide could just be a cry for help

• Suicidal intent is transient

• Pain is controllable

• Terminally ill patients could be depressed, and depression is treatable

• Legalizing PAS for terminal illness will spread non-voluntary euthanasia

25

PRENATAL GENETIC SCREENINGEthical issues in medical care

26

Page 14: Bioethics

Prenatal Diagnosis

• Ultrasounds are commonly performed to monitor development of a fetus

27

Prenatal Genetic Screening

• Combined test

– 10-14 weeks pregnant women

– Blood test and an ultrasound

– Screens for Down’s, Edwards’, and Patau’ssyndromes

• Doesn’t tell you if the fetus has any of these syndromes

• Tells if there is a higher or lower risk

28

Page 15: Bioethics

Prenatal Genetic Screening

• Low risk doesn’t mean no chance

• Higher risk Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling

– 1% risk of miscarriage during diagnostic testing

• If diagnosed with a syndrome, choice between continuation vs. termination

29

Prenatal Genetic Screening

• Should prospective parents be allowed to acquire whatever genetic information they want about their fetus?

– Success of human genome project makes it urgent to understand the ethics behind genetic testing

30

Page 16: Bioethics

Prenatal Genetic Screening

• Where do we stop?

– Is it okay to test for chance of heart disease?

– How about chance of getting cancer?

– How about chance of diabetes?

– How about potential IQ?

• Although some of these questions are not applicable in today’s technology, with the pace of scientific advancements, you might actually face these dilemmas in your lifetime

31

GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODEthical issues in biotech products

32

Page 17: Bioethics

Genetically Modified Foods

• Answer True or False*

– All plants contain genes

– Only genetically modified plants contain genes

– Plants can be modified to contain animal genes

– A tomato containing a jellyfish gene would taste like squid

– Genetically modified foods are available at a store near you

– I have never eaten a genetically modified food

33*From Markkula Center for Applied Ethics

Genetically Modified Foods

• What GM foods have I eaten?

34

Page 18: Bioethics

Genetically Modified Food

• Before modern biotechnology– Modifying crops through selection, breading and

crossing

• After advancements in molecular biology– Deletion and insertion of gene(s)

– Novel traits• Increased yield

• Disease resistance

• Longer shelf-life

• Enhanced nutrient content

35

Arguments

• What are your arguments supporting GM food?

• What are your arguments opposing GM food?

36

Page 19: Bioethics

Ethical Concerns

• Is genetic engineering meddling with nature?

– Yes, we can’t predict potential ramifications

– No, it is an evolution of traditional selective breeding

• What are possible future effects of GM foods?

– Positive: Can lead to a sustainable future

– Negative: May pose serious environmental, socio-economic, and health problems for future generations

37

Ethical Concerns

• Will this help the developing world?– Yes, GM crops can increase food supply to

malnourished people

– No, Africa and other under-developed parts of the world could be used as dumping grounds

• Is patenting of these GM crops ethical?– Patenting will help in revenue, which is an

incentive for innovation

– Patenting removes the possibility of a sustainable future

38

Page 20: Bioethics

INFORMED CONSENTEthical issues in biological research

39

What is Informed Consent?

• Providing sufficiently detailed information to participants before they consent to participate

• Includes:

– Purpose of the study

– Expected duration

– Procedures of the study

– Information on their right to decline or withdraw

– Foreseeable consequences of withdrawing or declining

– Potential risk, discomfort, or adverse effects

– Prospective research benefits

– Incentives

– Whom to contact for questions

40

Page 21: Bioethics

Henrietta Lacks

• 1951 – 31-year old Henrietta Lacks died of cervical cancer in Johns Hopkins University

• Dr. George Gey

– Worked on culturing human cells

– Received Lacks’ cells

• Lacks’ cells obtained without informed consent

• Survived and reproduced an entire generation every 24 h

41

Henrietta Lacks

• First time human cells grew and reproduced outside human body

• First immortal cell line (HeLa) was created

• More than 50 million tonnes of HeLa cells have been grown since she died

• Over 60,000 papers have used her cells

• Millions of dollars

• Thousands of scientific careers

• Hundreds of millions of patients

42

Page 22: Bioethics

Violation of Privacy

• ‘Genetic characteristics of HeLa cell’– Paper published by McKusick et al. in 1976

– Breached many confidentiality rules that are very serious today

• ‘A Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman’s Immortal Legacy and the Medical Scandal it Caused’

– Book published by Michael Gold

– Described her autopsy

– He was given access to medical records without family consent

43

Violation of Privacy

• In 2013, genome was published without permission

• NIH and Lacks’ family have come to an agreement– Family gets some control over access to cells’

DNA code

– Acknowledgement in scientific papers

– Two family members join the six member committee which will regulate access to the code

44

Page 23: Bioethics

Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

• 1932-72 by US Public Health Service

• Study of natural progression of untreated syphilis in rural African-American men in Alabama

45

Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

• Participants were not informed about their disease

• Participants were not treated

– Although penicillin was identified as an effective antibiotic against syphilis

46

Page 24: Bioethics

ANIMAL TESTINGEthical issues in biological research

47

Animal Testing

• Used to develop new medicines

• Test safety of experimental medical procedures

• E.g. Monkeys in polio research, Cats in anti-hypertensive drug research

48

Page 25: Bioethics

Animal Testing

• What are your thoughts?

49

A Scientist’s Perspective

• Medical progress depends on animal research

• Human testing will become riskier

• In vitro studies are performed ahead

• In vitro systems won’t provide comprehensive understanding

• Care is taken to make the process as humane as possible

• 3Rs – replacement, reduction, and refinement

50

Page 26: Bioethics

A Philosopher’s Perspective –Supporting Animal Testing

• Animals are not morally equal to humans

– Lesser cognitive capabilities

– Lesser autonomy

• Animals don’t have the same rights as humans

Does this mean infants and mentally challenged humans are also not morally equal to other fully

developed humans?

• But these humans come really close, so can’t be considered the same as animals

51

A Philosopher’s Perspective –Opposing Animal Testing

• Animals have some moral status

– Wrong to abuse/hurt pets and other animals

• Strongest supporter for animal rights

– Humans and animals are equal• Otherwise it is ‘speciesism’

– Deserve fundamental rights and freedoms

52

Page 27: Bioethics

An Animal Activist’s Perspective

• Animals are exposed to too much suffering

• Better alternatives than animal research

• We don’t have the right to exploit nature’s beings

53

EMBRYONIC STEM CELLSEthical issues in biological research

54

Page 28: Bioethics

Embryonic Stem Cells

• What are stem cells?

• What are embryonic stem cells?

• What are the other types of stem cells?

• Why embryonic stem cells?

55

Embryonic Stem Cells

• How are embryonic stem cells obtained?

56

Page 29: Bioethics

Ethical Questions

• Similar to abortion: when does life start?

• Is it okay to create embryos purely for destroying it?

57

HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE CLONINGEthical issues in biological research

58

Page 30: Bioethics

What is Cloning?

• Creating a genetic copy of a sequence of DNA or a whole genome

59

What is Reproductive Cloning?

• Somatic cell nuclear transfer

• Different from IVF

60

Page 31: Bioethics

Dolly – The Most Popular Sheep

61

Should We Clone Humans?

• Why should we clone humans?

• Why shouldn’t we clone humans?

62

Page 32: Bioethics

Reasons for Wanting Human Reproductive Cloning

• May be the only way to have a genetically related child

• Avoid sharing of DNA in the child

• “Replacement child”

– Cloning of replacement pets

• Control over child’s genome

• Creating an ideal donor

63

Reasons Against Human Reproductive Cloning

• Cloning is unnatural and wrong

• Clone’s identity and individuality are threatened

• Clones could be created purely as donors

• Clones could be discriminated against

• Could be an evolutionary disadvantage

64

Page 33: Bioethics

HUMAN GENETIC ENHANCEMENTEthical issues in biological research

65

Debate on Creating a Super Hero

66