BioEnergy Science Center - Computing and Computational...

25
BioEnergy BioEnergy Science Center: Science Center: a DOE a DOE Bioenergy Bioenergy Research Center Research Center Reinhold C. Mann Associate Laboratory Director Biological and Environmental Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory September 24, 2007 Fall Creek Falls Conference Nashville, Tennessee

Transcript of BioEnergy Science Center - Computing and Computational...

BioEnergyBioEnergy Science Center: Science Center: a DOE a DOE BioenergyBioenergy Research CenterResearch Center

Reinhold C. Mann Associate Laboratory Director Biological and Environmental Sciences Oak Ridge National LaboratorySeptember 24, 2007Fall Creek Falls ConferenceNashville, Tennessee

2

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements (no priority order)(no priority order)

• Brian Davison• Mark Downing• Bob Perlack• Jonathan Mielenz• Martin Keller• Gary Jacobs• Jerry Tuskan• Stan Wullschleger• Tim Tschaplinski• Bob Hettich• Ed Uberbacher• Tris West

• Neal Stewart (UT)• Gary Sayler (UT)• Al Darvill (UGA)• Deborah Mohnen (UGA)• Art Ragauskas (GaTech)• Rick Dixon (Noble Foundation)• Lee Lynd (Dartmouth)• Mike Himmel (NREL)• Charles Wyman (UC-Riverside)• Percival Zhang (VaTech)• Mike Brady (Cornell)• Jae Edmonds (PNNL, JGCRI)

3

Stabilization of COStabilization of CO22 concentrations means concentrations means fundamental change to the global energy fundamental change to the global energy

systemsystem

Oil Oil + CCSNatural Gas Natural Gas + CCSCoal Coal + CCSBiomass Energy Nuclear EnergyNon-Biomass Renewable Energy End-use Energy

History and Reference Case

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

Glo

bal P

rimar

y E

nerg

y 18

50-2

100

(Exa

joul

es)

FutureHistory

Stabilization of CO2 at 550 ppm

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

Glo

bal P

rimar

y E

nerg

y 18

50-2

100

(Exa

joul

es)

.

FutureHistory

Preindustrial280ppm

Preindustrial280ppm

Source: Jae Edmonds

4

Concern relating to threat of climate change

Con

cern

ove

r fut

ure

avai

labi

lity

of o

il an

d ga

s

High

HighLow

Low

Biofuels

Carbon-free H2 for

transport

GTL

Heavy Oil

EnhancedRecoveryArctic

Capture and storage (C&S)

C&S

Transport sector

CNG

Hybrids

C&S

Vehicle efficiency(e.g., light-weighting)

Diesel-ization

Technology options for transportationTechnology options for transportation

Source: Steve Koonin, BP

Supply side optionsDemand side options

CTL

Ultra Deep Water

Decreasing U.S.Decreasing U.S.petroleum consumptionpetroleum consumptionCongress:The “30 by 30” goal

World Ethanol and Biodiesel Annual Production

(Petroleum use @ 1150 B g/yr)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Fuel

(bill

ion

annu

al g

allo

ns)

EthanolBiodiesel

State of the Union 2007:The “20 in 10” goal

• Replace 30% of gas and diesel consumption with biofuelsby 2030

• Requires approximately 1B dry tons of biomass for 60B gal using current technology

• “Billion Ton Study” – there is enough biomass in the US

• Decrease consumption by 20%in 10 years

• Grow production of renewable fuels to 35B gal/year by 2017

4359 4288

528251 79 79 40 32

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Mill

ion

Ann

ual G

allo

ns

Brazil US

China EU

IndiaCan

adaColumbia

OthersAnnual Ethanol Production by

Country in 2005

Upper limit of corn ethanol is around 18 billion gal per year (National Corn Growers Association)

With capacity being built we will reach this limit within two years

We must add cellulosicbiofuels in order to meet our national goals

6

Potential biomass resource and refinery Potential biomass resource and refinery capacity in 2030capacity in 2030Forest residues (all), crop residues, Forest residues (all), crop residues, switchgrassswitchgrass

Source: Perlack et al., ORNLBioenergy Resource & Engineering Systems

Data do not include pulp & paper assets in the SoutheastThe Southeast and Midwest will be the sources for US biomass

7

BillionBillion--ton followton follow--upup

• Developed new fine-scaled estimates of potential switchgrass productivity− Extend to woody crops

(with USDA Forest Service)

Multiplicative model estimates yield as the product of estimated maximum yield, Ymax and the fractional reduction due to each limiting variable, temperature (T) and precipitation (P)

)()(

)()(

PYPY

TYTYYYield

maxmaxmax=

Source: Bob Perlack et al, ORNLBioenergy Resource & Engineering Systems

8

Combining National Land Cover Data with the Cropland Data Layer

Source: Tris West et al, ORNLEcosystem Simulation Science

9

Source: Carlo N. Hamelinck, “Outlook for Advanced Biofuels,” PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 2004

Lignocellulosicbiomass

Sugar/starchcrops

Oil plants

Gasification

Anaerobicdigestion

Flash pyrolysis

Hydrothermalliquefaction

Hydrolysis

Milling andhydrolysis

Pressing orextraction

Syngas

Biogas

Bio oil

Sugar

Vegetable oil

Water gas shift+ separation

Catalyzedsynthesis

Purification

Hydro treatingand refining

Fermentation

Esterification

Hydrogen(H2)

Methanol(CH3OH)

DME(CH3OCH3)

FT Diesel(CxHy)

SNG(CH4)

Biodiesel(CxHy)

Ethanol(CH3CH2OH)

Biodiesel(alkyl esters)

Bio oil (vegetable oil)

Conversion routes to Conversion routes to biofuelsbiofuelsMany feedstocks, many conversion options, many products,different economics, energy balances

10

ORNL leads one of three DOE ORNL leads one of three DOE BioenergyBioenergy Research CentersResearch Centers

• Funded for $125M over 5 years− Awarded June 26

• Start September 07• Interface with

Tennessee BiofuelsInitiative

• Two other centers at− U Wisconsin− www.wisconsinbioenergy.com

− LBNL− jbei.lbl.gov

http://www.bioenergycenter.org

11

• Oak Ridge National Laboratory• University of Georgia• University of Tennessee• National Renewable Energy Laboratory• Georgia Tech• Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation • Dartmouth• ArborGen• Verenium (formerly Diversa)• Mascoma• Individuals from U California-Riverside,

Cornell, Washington State, U Minnesota, NCSU, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Virginia Tech

• Oak Ridge National Laboratory• University of Georgia• University of Tennessee• National Renewable Energy Laboratory• Georgia Tech• Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation • Dartmouth• ArborGen• Verenium (formerly Diversa)• Mascoma• Individuals from U California-Riverside,

Cornell, Washington State, U Minnesota, NCSU, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Virginia Tech

Complex CarbohydrateResearch Center

Alternative Fuels User Facility

The BESC team has been assembledThe BESC team has been assembledto overcome biomass recalcitranceto overcome biomass recalcitranceJoint Institute forBiological Sciences

12

Overcoming recalcitrance is the

single coherent overarching theme

for the BESC

The fundamental scienceThe fundamental scienceof biomass recalcitranceof biomass recalcitranceis poorly understoodis poorly understood

• A large-scale, integrated, interdisciplinary approach is neededto overcome this problem

– Current research efforts are limited in scope– BESC will launch a broad and comprehensive

attack on a scale well beyond any efforts to date

• Without advances, a cellulosic biofuels industry is unlikely to emerge• Knowledge gained will benefit other

biofuels and biofeedstocks

Sugars

Cellulosicbiomass

Fuel(s)Recalcitrance:Resistance to

breakdowninto sugars

13

BESC will revolutionize how biomass is BESC will revolutionize how biomass is processed within five years processed within five years

14

BESC has wellBESC has well--defined objectivesdefined objectivesRevolutionize theprocessing of biomass within 5 years

Apply a systems biology approach and new higher-throughput pipelines

• Improve overall yields

• Simplify operationsthrough consolidatedbioprocessing (CBP)

• Decrease (or eliminate)the need for costlychemical pretreatment

• Reduce recalcitranceby targeted modification of plant cell wall compositionand structures

• Develop and understand single microbes or microbial consortia and their enzymes to enable CBP for low-cost cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation

• Provide a synergistic combination of modified plants and CBP for even morecost-effective biofuelproduction

15

Three linked scientific focus areas will enable Three linked scientific focus areas will enable BESC to understand and overcomeBESC to understand and overcomebiomass recalcitrancebiomass recalcitrance

16

Biomass formationand modification

• What gene productscontrol cell wallstructure, composition,and recalcitrance?

• How will changesin cell wall structure and composition affect plant productivity, pest resistance, and/or sustainability?

Challenge:Identify genes that control biomass productionand cell wall synthesis

BESC integrates three key BESC integrates three key science focus areasscience focus areas

Characterizationand modeling

• What structural and compositional elements contribute to recalcitrance?

• Can new analytical methods, systems biology data, and computational models enable predictive simulation of lignocellulose formation and deconstruction?

Challenge:Understand the complexity of plant cell wall structure and its relationship to recalcitrance

Biomass deconstructionand conversion

• What limits the rate of biomass deconstruction, and how can these limits be overcome by altered biocatalysts?

• Will the combination of altered cell walls with better conversion offer a breakthrough?

Challenge:Improve deconstruction ratesand understand how microbesand enzymes attackbiomass substrates

17

Computational BiologyComputational Biology• Annotation, DNA sequence analysis, gene finding,

regulatory regions, comparative analyses - plants and microbes

• Systems analysis of mRNA and protein expression patterns

• Metabolic and regulatory network reconstruction in plants and microbes

• Image analysis and reconstruction software for 3-D tomography or confocal, cryo-EM

• Protein structure prediction and docking calculation

• Protein complex molecular dynamicsyeast

IBM SP3

18

Exocellulase on crystalline cellulose based on explicit water model by Brady (Cornell) and provided by Himmel (NREL).The 1,000,000 atom simulation ran for 50 nsecusing LAMMPS code on Jaguar 1024 processors by Uberbacher, Agarwal, Locascio, and Ghattyvenkatakrishna (ORNL).

UltraUltra--scale modeling and scale modeling and simulation of simulation of biological systemsbiological systems

19

UltraUltra--scale modelingscale modelingchallenges in BESCchallenges in BESCLarger scale (e.g. cellulosomes) - Increase in scale to 10’s of millions of atoms

Millisecond timeframes

Multiscale simulation methods and force fields for systems of 100 million atoms scale – microbial and plant cell wall structures and cellulosomes

New force fields based on neutron dynamical measurements integrated with computational molecular simulation

20

Data ManagementData Managementand Integrationand Integration

Laboratory Information Management System for tracking samples, procedures, data, IP, models

Lab instrument / user input interfaces to LIMS for data input and tracking

Systems knowledge base with data and information about key plants and microbes in the Center, metabolic, regulatory and signaling maps, with links to primary genome sequence annotation and underlying experimental data.

Integrated Analysis

Experiment Description

Project

User

Reference

Mutant

Experiment Run

Proteome

Computational Analysis

Experiment Run

Microarray

Computational Analysis

Experiment Run

Cell Culture

Experiment Run

BESC BESC –– a highly integrated cuttinga highly integrated cutting--edge research teamedge research team

A functional management structure A functional management structure integrates BESC activities and objectives integrates BESC activities and objectives with clear lines of authoritywith clear lines of authority

23

BESC leverages substantial firm BESC leverages substantial firm commitments and investmentscommitments and investments• State of Tennessee,

through UT: >$24.6M− JIBS construction: $11.6M − Research equipment: $3M − Joint UT-ORNL research: $10M− 3 Governor’s Chairs: $3M–$5M

• State of Tennessee: $48M− $40M for 5M-gal/year pilot

switchgrass-to-ethanol facility, located <40 miles from ORNL,to be operational in 2009

− $8M in agricultural price supports

• Georgia Research Alliance: $6M− $3M for equipment, − $1.5M for two Eminent Scholar

hires (matched by $1.5Mfrom UGa and Georgia Tech)

• Virginia Tech: $0.5Min cost share support

• Oklahoma Bioenergy Center − Update to Governor Henry’s letter− >$10M at the Noble Foundation

as part of this $40M centerwith University of Oklahomaand Oklahoma State

Total:Total:More than More than $90M$90M

BESCBESC’’ss distinctive strengthsdistinctive strengths• One coherent focused theme:

Biomass recalcitrance• Positioned to attack the most important

current barrier to the emergenceof a cellulosic biofuels industry

• The best team and managementfor revolutionary advancesto overcome recalcitrance

25

BESC larger contextBESC larger context

BESCS&T core

team

Scientific Impact

Visiting Scientists

Graduate studentsPost-docs

Use-inspired drivers, licensing $$

IP, tools,processes,platforms

Technology maturationCommercialization

Pilots VC investments

Industry partnerships

Science Board

Science Translation and Application

Biofuelsindustry growth

Benefit tofarmers

States supportDirect -TN, GA, NC, others

Benefit toconsumers

SunGrantR&D other

R&D