Binder9 - Greenville County Redevelopment Authority · 2017 CAPER Greenville County Consolidated...
Transcript of Binder9 - Greenville County Redevelopment Authority · 2017 CAPER Greenville County Consolidated...
2017 CAPER
Greenville County
Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report
Program Year 2017
July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018
Prepared by Greenville County Redevelopment Authority
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year.
As the administrator of HUD entitlements for the Greenville County, the Greenville County Redevelopment Authority (GCRA) expended a total
of $ 4,430,648.17 of its CDBG, HOME and ESG funds to implement fiscal year 2017 programs and projects in the County’s unincorporated areas
and five participating municipalities: Greer, Simpsonville, Mauldin, Travelers Rest, and Fountain Inn . The funding expenditure breakdown
consists of $ 2,904,403.69 in CDBG; $1,336,416.59 in HOME and $ 189,827.89 in ESG fund. The FY 2017 Community Development Financial
Summary (PR-26) report indicates that a total 95.97 % of the Greenville County’s CDBG fund was used to directly benefit low and moderate
income households in the County for the reporting year, of which 8.40 % of the fund was used for public service activities and 18.51 % was used
on planning and administrative actives. The County's CDBG expenditure are in in compliance with the statutory requirement for fund.
Additionally, the County’s HOME and ESG funds were used to benefit low and moderate income households and individuals. Approximately
forty-four (47%) of the ESG fund was used to address shelter and outreach activities and 7.5% was expended on administration. All of the ESG
subreipients' funds were matched at a ratio of 1:1 with Private and Greenville County general fund dollars.
The following are highlights of priority area accomplishments and progress towards planned goals:
The County accomplished 72% of its annual housing goal by completing 142 of 196 units projected. The affordable housing units are provided
via new construction of homeownership and rental units, rehabilitation for homeownership and rental opportunities, owner-occupied
rehabilitation, home repairs for seniors or persons living with disabilities, direct financial assistance as downpayment or closing cost for First
Time Homebuyers towards the purchase of their homes and tenant rental assistance for families or individuals at risk of homelessness or
literally homeless. The County continues to far exceed the required HOME Match obligation. The County’s HOME Match liability for FY 2017
is $209,462.58. However, the County’s HOME match contribution reported for FY 2017 is $463,165. This exceeds FY 2017 obligation by
$253,702.42
The County in coordination with its CoC partners assisted a total of 2,827 persons with its ESG program for shelter, outreach, HMIS and HPRP. A
total of 54 households were assisted with Prevention and Rehousing (HPRP), consisting of a total of 124 persons.
Special Needs: The County assisted 38 seniors and persons living with disabilities with emergency home repairs. The Engineering and permitting
has been completed for infrastructure projects in Simpsonville (Woodside area), Fountain Inn (Rosemary Street in Sanctified Hill in Fountain Inn
and facility improvement project - ADA Facility improvement project for the Mauldin Senior Center.
1
Economic Development: Two Business loans were provided to 2 small businesses owners in the City of Greer and City of Fountain Inn.
Additionally, three businesses were provided with façade funding.
Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and
explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual
outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.
-See attached Table---
Goal Category Source /
Amount
Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected –
Strategic
Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected –
Program
Year
Actual –
Program
Year
Percent
Complete
Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date
2
Goal Category Source / Amount Indicator
Unit of
Measure
Expected – Strategic Plan
Actual-
Strategic Plan combined
Combined
2015 - 2017 Years
Percent completed
2015 Annual
Percent
Complete
Expected
2016
Actual
2016
2016 Annual
Percent
Complete Expected 2017 Actual 2017
2017 Annual
Percentage
Complete
DH-1 Homeownership Affordable Housing
CDBG: $ 412,814
HOME: $481,435
MLF - $300,000
Homeowner
Housing Added
Household
Housing Unit 55 29 44 80 53% 20 10 50 24 15 63
DH-1 Homeownership Affordable Housing
CDBG:$239,169/
HOME:$322,963
Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated
Household
Housing Unit 30 2 6 20 7% 6 0 0 7 4 57
DH-1 Homeownership Affordable Housing
CDBG:$239,169/
HOME:$322,963 Home Repair Housing unit 233 0 38 16 0% 0 0 0 76 38 50
DH-2 Rentals Affordable Housing
CDBG: $260,020/
HOME: $214,170
Rental units
constructed
Household
Housing Unit 73 16 17 23 22% 18 0 0 18 1 6
DH-2 Rentals Affordable Housing
CDBG: $260,020/
HOME: $214,170 Other - Repair Housing unit 55 7 10 18 13% 3 2 67 3 3 100
DH-3 Homebuyers Affordable Housing
HOME: $656,768/
CDBG $316,855
Direct Financial
Assistance - First
Time Homebuyers
Households
Assisted 120 55 80 67 46% 30 27 90 25 25 100
DH-3 Homebuyers Affordable Housing MLF: $150,000
End Mortgages -
Direct Financial
Assistance Other 13 5 7 54 4% 3 1 33 3 2 67
DH-4 Special Needs -
Housing
Non-Homeless Special
Needs
CDBG: $320,000/
HOME: $50,000
Rental units
constructed
Household
Housing Unit 5 0 0 0 0% 6 0 0 0 0 0
DH-4 Special Needs -
Housing
Non-Homeless Special
Needs
CDBG: $320,000/
HOME: $50,000
Rental units
rehabilitated
Household
Housing Unit 30124 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
DH-4 Special Needs -
Housing
Non-Homeless Special
Needs
CDBG: $320,000/
HOME: $50,000
Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated
Household
Housing Unit 250 128 166 66 0% 60 67 112 76 38 50
DH-4 Special Needs -
Housing
Non-Homeless Special
Needs
CDBG: $320,000/
HOME: $50,000 Other Other 20 3 3 15 15% 0 0 0 0 0 0
DH-5 Homelessness -
At Risk Homeless ESG: $25,459.98
Homelessness
Prevention Persons Assisted 250 158 209 84 63% 40 92 230 50 51 102
DH-6 Homelessness -
Rehousing Homeless ESG: $25,459.38
Tenant-based
rental assistance /
Rapid Rehousing
Households
Assisted/Persons
Assisted 300 153 228 76 51% 60 43/84 #VALUE! 50 75 150
DH-7 Homelessness -
Transitional/shelter homeless needs ESG: $82,943
Homelessness
needs Persons Assisted 4430 3558 4632 105 80% 600 637 106 650 1074 165
Outreach Homeless ESG: $15,000 people 0 1629 #DIV/0! 0% 30 0 0 1700 1629 96
ED-1 Job Training Homeless
Jobs
created/retained Jobs 133 0 0 0 0% 10 0 0 0 0 0
ED-2 Business
Establishment
Non-Housing
Community
Development CDBG:$25,000 Businesses assisted
Businesses
Assisted 9 1 3 33 11% 5 0 0 2 2 100
ED-3 Mortgages -
Homebuyers Affordable Housing MLF: $150,000
Direct Financial
Assistance to
Homebuyers
Households
Assisted 13 5 7 54 38% 3 1 33 2 2 100
ED-4 Facade
Improvement
Non-Housing
Community
Development CDBG - $35,000 Businesses assisted
Businesses
Assisted 22 10 13 59 45% 5 4 80 8 3 38
3
Goal Category Source / Amount Indicator
Unit of
Measure
Expected – Strategic Plan
Actual-
Strategic Plan combined
Combined
2015 - 2017 Years
Percent completed
2015 Annual
Percent
Complete
Expected
2016
Actual
2016
2016 Annual
Percent
Complete Expected 2017 Actual 2017
2017 Annual
Percentage
Complete
NR-1 Neighborhood
planning
Non-Housing
Community
Development Other Other 8 5 7 88 63% 3 3 100 2 2 100
NR-2 Neighborhood
GAP
Non-Housing
Community
Development CDBG - $6,655.06 Other Other 49 11 16 33 22% 5 6 120 5 5 100
PA-1 Project
Management Affordable Housing
CDBG/MLF:
$642,233
HOME:$138,541
ESG: $16,430.40 Other Other 5 2 3 60 40% 1 1 100 1 1 100
SL-1 Blight
Elimination Affordable Housing $210,000
Buildings
Demolished Buildings 175 23 23 13 13% 13 13 100 16 0
SL-10 Fair Housing Affordable Housing CDBG: $35,000 Other Other 886 3596 4854 548 406% 1000 3402 340 1574 1258 80
SL-11 Housing
Counseling Affordable Housing 0 Other Other 886 1361 2426 274 154% 500 1234 247 800 1065 133
SL-2 Public Safety
Non-Housing
Community
Development Other Other 20 2 2 10 10% 20 0 0 0 0 0
SL-3 Public Facilities
Non-Housing
Community
Development Other Other 1 0 1 100 0% 2 0 0 2 1 50
SL-4 Public Services
Non-Housing
Community
Development CDBG- $310,500
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit Persons Assisted 20000 19929 31753 159 100% 12000 12558 105 9,640 11824 123
SL-5 Infrastructure
Improvements
Non-Housing
Community
Development CDBG: $924,689
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit Persons Assisted 3000 2520 5495 183 0% 5000 0 0 2975 2975 100
SL-6 Homelessness
Services Homeless ESG: $25,000
Services -
Homelessness
Prevention & Rapid
Rehousing Persons Assisted 2200 2120 2245 102 96% 1700 1956 115 100 125 125
SL-7 Relocation Affordable Housing Other Other 5 0 0 0 0% 2 0 0 0 0 0
SL-8 Brownfield
Assessment and
Cleanup
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Brownfield acres
remediated Acre 2 11 12 600 550% 1 0 0 1 1 100
SL-9 Tree Planting
Non-Housing
Community
Development Other Other 600 135 135 23 23% 500 24 5 0 0 0
4
Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan,
giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.
Provide Decent Affordable Housing: One of the needs identified in the Greenville County Housing Study prepared in 2017 is the extremely high
housing cost burden on families making less than $25,000 per year for low to very low income families. This is also consistent with the County
priority objective to provide assistance to households with annual income of 50% or below of the Area Median Income (AMI) and for
particularly seniors or persons living with disability to have access to affordable housing, opportunities to age in place, or suitable living by
addressing handicap accessible means to the house. The County completed a total of 88 housing units with HOME and CDBG funds, of which 48
of the units were HOME funded and 40 units were CDBG funded. Fifty one (51%) percent of the housing units assisted with CDBG and HOME
funds are occupied by households with income 50 percent and below of the AMI. Ten of the HOME assisted homeownership units are occupied
by families with income of 50% and below of the AMI. These units are all occupied by low and moderate income households.
Promote Suitable Living Environment: A total of 6 substandard properties were demolished, eliminating blight and creating redevelopment
opportunities in Greer, Brutontown and Fountain Inn. The infrastructure improvement for Miller Place Court, an 18 unit (duplex style) mixed
income development in Mauldin was completed. Used $482,500 for infrastructure improvements on Spring Street in Needmore community in
Greer. The Greenville Legislative Delegation Transportation Committee (GLDTC) will match 1:1 of CDBG funds. The completion is targeted for
early 2019. The engineering design, permitting fees and right of way acquisition for the sidewalk and drainage Improvement in Simpsonville
(Woodside community) and Fountain Inn (Sanctified Hill neighborhood) and for the Mauldin Senior Center facility improvement addressing ADA
requirements are completed. A total of $310,500 in CDBG fund, consisting of 8.4% of total CDBG expended funds was used to provide public
services activities for youth/senior recreation and enrichment activities, medical prescriptions for uninsured seniors, fair housing services,
weekend meals for the homebound and mentally challenged, and a myriad of relief and referral services for low income households and
veterans benefitting 11,824 persons.
Expand Economic Development Opportunities: The exterior of three commercial buildings were renovated with façade fund and 2 small
business owners received business loans. These businesses created and or retained low and moderate income jobs.
Address Homelessness: 54 households or 124 individuals were assisted with rental assistance to prevent homelessness via the homelessness
prevention and rapid rehousing program and casemangement services. Additionally, a total of 2,703 homeless persons were assisted via
Continuum of Care Partners with shelters, and outreach opportunities.
Promote Neighborhood Revitalization: Provided Grant Assistance Program funds to five low and moderate neighborhoods in the County with a
total of $6,665 for capacity building initiatives in their communities.
5
CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted
Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).
91.520(a) Table 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds
Narrative
In fiscal year 2017, the County assisted 10,191 families with CDBG and families with HOME programs
that address priority goals such as affordable housing, a suitable living environment and special
needs. The majority of beneficiaries were served by the CDBG program. The CDBG program benefited
10,143 people and the HOME program 48. Whites represent the largest percentage of families assisted
by CDBG & HOME programs. A total of 6,859 white families were assisted representing 67 percent of all
beneficiaries. African American families at 29 percent follow whites as the second largest racial group
benefitting from CDBG & HOME programs with a total of 3,008 persons served. Asians and other multi-
racial groups represent the smallest share at .07 and 2 percent respectively for a combined total of 432
beneficiaries.
While 67 percent of whites make up the largest beneficiary group for CDBG, African American families
represent the largest beneficiary group for the HOME program. 58 percent of families assisted by the
HOME program were African Americans. Whites and Asians make up the remaining share of HOME
beneficiaries at 37 percent and .04 percent respectively. Hispanic families represent .08 percent of all
families served with CDBG and HOME programs.
CDBG HOME ESG
White 6841 18 797
Black 2980 28 1922
Asian 73 3
Other 249 2 38
Mult i 67
Hispanic 855 n/ a
Non-Hispanic 9288
6
CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program Year
CDBG CDBG 5,669,400 2,907,404
HOME HOME 3,082,242 1,336,417
HOPWA HOPWA
ESG ESG 219,072 189,828
Other Other 789,404 423,909
Table 3 - Resources Made Available
Narrative
The County expended a total of $4,857,558 during FY 2017, of which $4,433,649 is from the County's
entitlement funds (CDBG, HOME and ESG) and $423,909 from various private financing (bank loans) and
public funds to achieve the proposed outcomes enumerated on the goals and outcome table.
Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
Target Area Planned
Percentage of
Allocation
Actual Percentage
of Allocation
Narrative
Description
Belle Meade
BRANDON
BRANDON/FREETOWN
COMMUNITY
BRUTONTOWN COMMUNITY 12 9.64
Strategic
Neighborhood
Conestee
Dunean
FOUNTAIN INN 5 2.96 MUNICIPALITY
FOUNTAIN INN SANCTIFIED HILL
GREENVILLE COUNTY -
UNINCORPORATED 35 43.02 COUNTYWIDE
GREER 18 28.99 MUNICIPALITY
GREER NEEDMORE
JUDSON COMMUNITY
MAULDIN 13 11.94 MUNICIPALITY
MONAGHAN
NEW WASHINGTON HEIGHTS
POE
7
Simpsonville 13 1.87 Municipality
STERLING
Travelers Rest 4 1.59 Municipality
VICTOR
WEST BRANDON
Table 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
Narrative
Brutontown continues to be GCRA’s current Strategy neighborhood. Tremendous amount of work has
been completed in a phased schedule in order to implement the Community’s Master Plan.
Approximately 80 percent of the proposed housing units has been completed and occupied. Three new
housing units consisting of 2 homeownership and one rental were completed and occupied. The City of
Greer has two active neighborhoods being redeveloped, namely ‘Creekside and Needmore’. Three new
homeownership units were completed and sold. Additional units are in progress and under various
stages of construction. A major Street improvement (Spring Street project) in the Needmore community,
involving new road pavement, storm drains, electric pole relocations, curbs and gutters is in progress.
Completion is anticipated at the end of the year or early 2019.
Miller Place development in the City of Mauldin, an 18 unit rental development, a partnership project
between the City of Mauldin and GCRA is currently in the vertical building stage. The project is a mixed
income development, consisting of 9 duplex buildings of approximately 1400 square feet (3 bedrooms
and 2 baths). All infrastructure work has been completed. The project is anticipated to be completed by
end of 2019. Engineering designs and permitting phases of infrastructure and facility improvement
projects in Simpsonville (Woodside – sidewalk/storm drains), Fountain Inn (Rosemary Street – sidewalk
and storm drain) and Mauldin Senior Center - ADA improvement have been completed. Bid processes
are also completed for the Simpsonville and Mauldin projects. These projects are anticipated to start in
the fall of 2018. The completion of the Brownfield remediation process for the Poe Mill Site is in process.
GCRA received $100,000 from the Appalachian Regional Commision (ARC) to leverage CDBG fund.
8
Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds),
including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any
publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the
needs identified in the plan.
All funding provided to housing partners or non-profit agencies in support of affordable housing and
public services are provided as gap funds. Additionally all Subrecipients awarded ESG funds are required
to provide a 1:1 match for their grants awards. As part of the underwriting criteria, the GCRA evaluates
project feasibility and recommends funding considering the amount of funds leveraged using other
public and or private funds. For fiscal year 2017, GCRA expended a total of $4,430,648 of CDBG, ESG
and HOME funds and leveraged approximately $6,019,449 dollars from various partners, private
funding and public agencies towards the implementation of the FY 2017 Annual Action Plan, providing
affordable housing and improving the quality of life of Greenville County Citizens.
A listing of some of the projects leveraged with other funding sources is as follows:
Housing: Total leverage amount $4,799,165
• · Habitat for Humanities – Leveraged CHDO funds of $128,000 with $463,165 from private
donations.
• · Community Works Carolina – First Time Home Buyers Program ($115,000), leveraged with
$2,500,000 from various lending or banking institutions providing end – mortgages.
• · Miller Place Project (9 duplexes- 18 units total) leveraged with $1,836,000 construction
loan from County Bank
Infrastructure/Public Facilities Improvement: Total leverage amount: $997,500
• · Spring Street road improvement project in Needmore, (Greer) leveraged with $572,500
from Greenville Legislative Delegation Transportation Committee
• · Poe Mill Brownfield Clean-up – leveraged with $100,000 from the Appalachian Regional
Commission
• · Mauldin ADA Facility Improvement – Leveraged with $325,000 from SC Governor’s Office
of Aging – PIP grant awarded to the City of Mauldin
Homelessness: Total leverage amount: 197,784: The five ESG Subrecipients, United Ministries, Step by
Step Ministries, United Housing Connections, Greenville County Human Relations Commission and
Greenville County Redevelopment Authority leverage the ESG fund with a total of $197,784 from private
donation, County General fund and private investments fund.
Other: The Greenville County Administration annually provides a total of $25,000 to the Greenville
County Redevelopment Authority for administrative support.
9
Fiscal Year Summary – HOME Match
1. Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 7,551,162
2. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year 463,165
3. Total match available for current Federal fiscal year (Line 1 plus Line 2) 8,014,327
4. Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 209,463
5. Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (Line 3 minus Line 4) 7,804,864
Table 5 – Fiscal Year Summary - HOME Match Report
10
Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year
Project No. or
Other ID
Date of
Contribution
Cash
(non-Federal
sources)
Foregone
Taxes, Fees,
Charges
Appraised
Land/Real
Property
Required
Infrastructure
Site
Preparation,
Construction
Materials,
Donated labor
Bond
Financing
Total Match
IDIS 2579 06/30/2017 463,165 0 0 0 0 0 463,165
Table 6 – Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year
HOME MBE/WBE report
Program Income – Enter the program amounts for the reporting period
Balance on hand at begin-
ning of reporting period
$
Amount received during
reporting period
$
Total amount expended
during reporting period
$
Amount expended for
TBRA
$
Balance on hand at end of
reporting period
$
0 827,632 566,722 0 0
Table 7 – Program Income
11
Minority Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises – Indicate the number and dollar value
of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period
Total Minority Business Enterprises White Non-
Hispanic Alaskan
Native or
American
Indian
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Black Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Contracts
Dollar
Amount 1,261,920 0 0 375,300 0 886,620
Number 28 0 0 5 0 23
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Women
Business
Enterprises
Male
Contracts
Dollar
Amount 1,261,920 335,000 926,920
Number 28 7 21
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0
Table 8 - Minority Business and Women Business Enterprises
Minority Owners of Rental Property – Indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners
and the total amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted
Total Minority Property Owners White Non-
Hispanic Alaskan
Native or
American
Indian
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Black Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 9 – Minority Owners of Rental Property
12
Relocation and Real Property Acquisition – Indicate the number of persons displaced, the cost of
relocation payments, the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisition
Parcels Acquired 0 0
Businesses Displaced 0 0
Nonprofit Organizations
Displaced 0 0
Households Temporarily
Relocated, not Displaced 0 0
Households
Displaced
Total Minority Property Enterprises White Non-
Hispanic Alaskan
Native or
American
Indian
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Black Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 10 – Relocation and Real Property Acquisition
13
CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the
number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income,
moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 40 54
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 80 50
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units 76 38
Total 196 142
Table 11 – Number of Households
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance 40 54
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units 47 16
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 84 46
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 5 26
Total 176 142
Table 12 – Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.
The County accomplished 72% of its annual housing goal by completing 142 of 196 units projected. The
affordable housing units served homeless families, provided with permanent housing units,
seniors/disabled persons through minor home repairs, homebuyers via down payment assistance and
home sales and renters via rehab and new construction. All of the homeownership units - new
production units were sold to households with annual income of 60 percent and below of the
AMI. Approximately 65 percent of all units served low income families earning 50% or below AMI. The
remaining units benefitted low and moderate income families earning up to 80% AMI.
14
The 54 unit shortfall was reflected in the performance of the County’s Minor and Major Home Repair
program, new construction sales and rental units developed by GCRA and its housing partners. In
recent years, the Major HRP program has experienced a decline in homeowners interested in home
repair debt and qualified applicants. The Housing Partner Projects such as Greenville Housing Futures (6
units) and Nehemiah (6 units) encountered funding delays from the State and private bank. Habitat for
Humanity constructed 4 of 5 proposed homeownership units with two closings expected in the Fall
2018. The infrastructure improvement in GCRA’s 18 unit rental duplex project known as Miller Place
Court in Mauldin was completed in 2017 and housing construction has just started. The housing
construction portion was bid twice, due to the extentive construction cost increase received from
bidders. Major development budget adjustment was necessary in order to accommodate the increased
construction cost. However, vertical construction is finally in progress.
Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.
GCRA and Housing Partner Projects that experienced delays in their project will be reflected in future
annual action plans. Future annual action plans may also reflect more partnerships to address housing
repair needs of low income homeowners, seniors and persons living with disabilities. Additionally,
potential changes and increased marketing for the owner-ocuupied and repair program is being
inititiated for the future.
Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.
Table 13 – Number of Households Served
Narrative Information
15
CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c)
Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending
homelessness through:
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their
individual needs
The County assisted 124 homeless individuals or households with permanent housing and case
management through Human Relations Commission to find affordable housing and various assistance
offered, including rental and utility deposits/payments. Through the United Ministries, the County
sponsored street outreach by engaging and providing critical services to 1629 homeless persons. United
Ministries offers a day shelter that provides showers, lockers, phones, mail boxes, case management
and one-on-one counseling. The agency also provides emergency assistance for food, rent, utilities,
prescriptions, food stamp assistance and employment readiness training etc.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
The Continuum of Care (CoC) agencies assist each other by coordination of their programs and support
services. The CoC agencies provide emergency shelters and transitional housing with support services
such as: job training, employment readiness, housekeeping, financial literacy and other services to help
clients reach the goal of independent living. The County supports CoC members by providing ESG
funding for street outreach, case management, maintenance, rehabilitation and operating cost for
emergency shelter and transitional housing and data collection via the HMIS system. Through the
County’s 2017 ESG Subrecipients: SHARE, United Housing Connections, Human Relations Commission,
and United Ministries and Step by Step women’s ministry; the County was able to aid 1074 homeless
persons with transitional and emergency shelter, 1629 via street outreach and 124 homeless individuals
or households with direct financial assistance for permanent housing.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely
low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after
being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care
facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections
programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that
address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs
The Greenville County Human Relations Commission administers the County’s Fair Housing and
Employment activities which involves investigating housing discrimination complaints, housing solution
referrals, and conducting educational programs on landlord tenant-relations, financial literacy, and
substandard housing. These activities, in addition to the case management provided for the Homeless
Prevention and Rapid Rehousing program, help individuals and families avoid homelessness and obtain
permanent housing.
16
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families
with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to
permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that
individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals
and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were
recently homeless from becoming homeless again
Our partners SHARE, Step By Step, and United Ministries assist those that have been incarcerated and
other chronically homeless persons that have health care issues and mental health problems. SHARE
and United Housing Connections focus primarily on individuals, many of which are veterans and some
are unaccompanied youth. United Ministries through its partnership with local congregations provides
emergency shelter and essential services for families. These organizations help with education and
employment as a means for preventing future homelessness. Additionally, through the Homeless
Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program, we assist homeless individuals and families, from seniors and
those with disabilities, to veterans, single parent families, and victims of domestic violence with case
management and permanent housing.
17
CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
The most notable accolades include:
• Preservation and Creation of 407 Affordable Housing Units. Comprehensive Renovation & New
Construction totaling $40 Million (94% private dollars). Projects included Manor at West
Greenville, Heritage at Sliding Rock, Harbor & Gallery of West Greenville and single family units.
• Portfolio Increase of 173 Units to include the acquisition of 48 units and the new construction of
115 units
• Successfully Conducted Temporary Relocation of 249 Families
• $16.9 Million in Rental Assistance paid directly to private landlords throughout Greenville
County
• Ending Homelessness for 139 Veteran Families through the HUD-VASH program
• Awarded the following Project Based Voucher (PBV) Contracts to the following developments
Project Based Voucher (PBV) & Rental Assistance
Stratham Place Apartments 19 (PBV) 55(RAD-PBV) 74 total
Valley Creek 23 (PBV) 25 (RAD-PBV) 55 Total
Reedy Place II 8 (PBV) 0 8 Total
Forest View 21 (PBV) 29 (RAD-PBV) 50 Total
Total 187
Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in
management and participate in homeownership
The Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program provides opportunities to residents of the Public Housing and
Housing Choice Voucher Programs to become financially independent. In 2017, the FSS graduated 12
participants and holds $153,000 in an escrow account which is made available to graduates for
purchasing a home, starting a business or paying for college tuition.
TGHA also has a Section Eight Housing Choice Voucher Program. Currently, there are 8 individuals who
have purchased homes using their voucher.
18
TGHA partners with Greenville County Human Relations Commission to provide Homebuyer Education
Course to families interested in becoming a homeowners.
Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
• Allowing other PHAS to piggy-back on existing TGHA contracts
• Sharing forms of solicitations with other PHAS
• Assisting and training staff of other PHAS as needed
• Available for oversight and management of other PHAs during the transitional stage.
19
CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as
barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning
ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the
return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i)
The Greenville County, GCRA and Hollingsworth foundation partnered to hire a consultant CZB, LLC to
conduct Affordable Housing Study for the County of Greenville. According to the Study, approximately
45,000 households in the County have income of less than $25,000 per year and 34,502 households earn
less than $20,000 per year. These target population experience an extremely high cost burden on
housing and in the future will find it hard pressed to find affordable, safe and decent rental units. As a
result the following goals were recommendations were as established in the report: (1) Preservation and
Improvement of existing housing stocks. (2) Helping qualified low and moderate income working
households employed in Greenville County become home owners in the County. (3) Add to supply of
affordable rental housing through new rental housing development.
The following barriers are identified:
• Cost burden on affordable housing development relating to impact fees assessed on projects.
• Lack of suitable or non-existence of infrastructure to support affordable housing development.
• Large lot zoning requirements in urban areas with historically small lot sizes.
• High cost of property and land:
• Relax zoning requirement to allow for smaller lots in LMA neighborhoods for affordable housing
development.
• The County to relax zoning to allow for attached housing on smaller lots for homeownership
units.
• Excessive frontage and setback requirements in urban areas with historically small lot sizes.
• Lack of funding sources to help with the development of affordable housing units. Inability to
compete with investors on over-priced property costs. This concern continues to increase, as
land & property cost have substantially increased.
• High cost of utility connections and permit fees.
• Specific actions are recommended by GCRA to County Council to address barriers to
affordable housing as a result of the Housing Study report.
• Continue to work with County Council and the Planning Department to establish overlay districts
that encourage investment and relax non-essential zoning and subdivision requirements that
impede affordable housing development.
• Continue to coordinate and work with public utility agencies to reduce infrastructure
improvement costs related to affordable housing development.
• County to assist with infrastructure improvement for affordable housing developments.
• The County to establish alternative funding source to support the development of affordable
housing or acquisition of properties.
20
• Continue to work with public utility agencies to waive impact fees for affordable housing
• Continue to find alternative funding sources to help gap fund affordable housing projects and
substantial supplement the entitlement funds in the County
• Partner and seek funding from several large companies (Manufacturing, Hospitals, hotels,
Financial Institutions, Schools, Corporate offices etc. in the Greenville) to investment and
support programs that will promote affordable or workforce housing productions for their
employees.
Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
· The GCRA administers an emergency rehab program that provides grant funds to seniors and
persons living with disabilities. This program provides up to $10,000 to address code issues and/or
improve handicap accessibility allowing residents to age in place. This program particularly assist our
clients that are below 30 percent of AMI and on fixed and limited income to address these code issues
and help them to remain in their homes.
· The GCRA partners with the Continuum of Care agencies to address homelessness in the County.
The ESG fund is used to help families at risk of homeless or literally homeless with permanent housing
by providing deposits to their rentals, pay off delinquent or outstanding utility bills that would prevent
families from obtaining future housing and pay their rents. Some of the measures are identified in the
Homeless White paper prepared in March 2015 are being implemented via a coordination with the
continuum care agencies. Individuals or families assisted are very low income families (30% or below of
AMI).
· Additionally, addressing barriers to affordable housing must continue to be a comprehensive
approach and commitment from public officials, private donors, and the public and as well coordinated
efforts of various county and city agencies. Education on affordable housing needs and gentrification
should continue to discussed and addressed. Providing opportunities such as donated
properties/developable lands with improved infrastructure are extremely helpful to the attainment of
affordable housing. Private foundations/donors providing grant funds towards affordable housing
development also helps to reduce the burden/dependency on Federal funds.
· Since, the completion of the Housing study, a coordinated effort by GCRA, Greenville County
departments, the City of Greenville, Greenville Housing Authority and Housing providers and partners
have joined together, and presented these recommendations to both City of Greenville and Greenville
County Council members for consideration and approval of various recommendations and initiatives to
assist in achieving the much need affordable housing in Greenville County.
Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The GCRA reduces lead-based paint hazards through its home repair policy which consist of risk
education for rehab program clients and varying levels of lead assessment and abatement based on the
extent of repair work. Policy guidelines to reduce lead-based paint hazards are as follows:
• All home repair participants with homes constructed before 1978 receive a brochure about the
hazards of lead based paint and must sign acknowledging receipt of the brochure. Safe work
21
practices are used on all repair jobs of less than $5,000. For roof jobs regardless of cost, a lead
paint clearance test is performed by a lead risk assessment firm after the roof is replaced. For all
jobs exceeding $5000, a lead risk assessment is performed and the results of the test are
incorporated into the scope of work for the job. A lead clearance test is performed by a risk
assessment firm upon the job’s completion. For jobs exceeding $25,000, abatement of lead
paint would occur.
Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
Assets such as savings and homeownership are essential to a family’s economic security. The County’s
downpayment assistance program helps low-income families build assets that are otherwise difficult to
attain due to limited resources and inability to save. GCRA also provides end mortgages,
using Mortgage Loan Fund to help households that are experiencing difficulty obtaining affordable
mortgage from traditional banks, due to no credit history or higher interest rate offered by bankers but
are however creditworthy to purchase their home. All participants are required to attend Financial
literacy, budgeting and pre-purchase and post homeownership classes with Greenville County Human
Relations Commission.
Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
• GCRA partnered with various development partners (non-profit and for profit agencies) and as
well as other public agencies, leveraging funds and resources to successfully accomplish the
Consolidated and Annual Action.
• GCRA provided technical assistance to the five cooperating municipalities participating in the
Greenville County urban county program.
Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service
agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The Greenville County Planning Department administers the County’s zoning and subdivision
regulations, and is responsible for comprehensive and specialized planning efforts, including the County
General Development Plan. The Planning Department Commission staff also administers zoning
ordinances and prepares plans for the Cities of Greenville, Fountain Inn, Greer, Mauldin, Simpsonville
and Travelers Rest, including elements related to land use and housing. The County Priority Investment
Area (PIA) 3 consists of majority of the County’s Redevelopment Area. The PIA promotes and
encourages coordination of public services and resources. The County’s Planning Department completes
master plans for the County’s Redevelopment Areas. Additionally, the GCRA coordinates with Code
Enforcement to demolish substandard properties in County redevelopment areas. The combination of
these coordinated efforts creates opportunities for the implementation of neighborhood master plans
by GCRA and its housing partners. The Greenville County Planning is in the process of a Comprehensive
Master Plan, which will include a comprehensive approach to the housing element compoenet. The
recommendations identified in the Greenville Housing study report will be an execellent resource to the
comprehensive master plan.
22
Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the
jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a)
The Greenville County Human Relations Commission (GCHRC) provides Fair Housing counseling and
education to low income and minority populations. However, minorities in Greenville County and the
City of Greenville continue to be targeted by discriminatory and predatory practices. GCHRC promotes
fair housing choice for all persons, regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status
or handicap. Fair housing education and outreach, however, is targeted towards those who are most
likely to be discriminated against, including African-Americans, Hispanics, the elderly, and the disabled.
The GCHRC provided assistance to 2046 clients, consisting of 800 households with landlord-tenant
issues. A total of 409 clients were assisted with homeless prevention issues, 306 clients with pre-rental
counseling housing placement, and 409 clients received eviction process/prevention, 307 clients
received emergency assistance to prevent disconnect/deposits, and 260 served in outreach/educational
serves. This number includes claims of discrimination cases. Claims of discrimination were forwarded to
SC Human Affairs Commission.
Workshops
The GCHRC held or participated in workshops and events targeting racial and ethnic minorities,
specifically the Hispanic and African-American populations. The organization held twenty Hispanic
community outreach events focusing on fair housing, ESL, literacy, homeownership, and employment
opportunities. This includes 72 financial stability and pre-purchase homebuyer education
workshops. During this period GCHRC also conducted 38 community workshops. Topics covered at
these events focused on fair housing, the South Carolina Landlord/Tenant Act, “buyers beware”
consumer education, identity thief prevention and affordable housing opportunities. GCHRC celebrated
the April Fair Housing month with 95 people in attendance.
ESG Program
The ESG program has assisted 124 households and or (71 adults & 53 children) persons. Four families
were victims of domestic violence. Fifteen elderly clients were served. Twelve clients were
disabled. Five veteran’s households were assisted. All ESG qualifying families received case
management. All families are now stable as they have moved into permanent housing. There were 100
families that received rapid rehousing assistance and 24 families received prevention funds.
23
CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance
of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs
involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning
requirements
GCRA is responsible for monitoring the performance of each grantee under the terms of its contract and
Memorandum of Understanding. Each project is reviewed for its compliance with applicable CDBG,
HOME and ESG program regulations. Monitoring procedures for applicable programs are described
below.
Economic Development Business Loan
During the application process, each business/project is evaluated to ensure that it meets the CDBG
National Objective of low and moderate income job creation or retention. GCRA staff prepares an
environmental review record per the National Environmental Protection Act, conducts a site visit and
compiles loan file with all the credit, financial, and underwriting information needed to verify program
eligibility. A bi-annual monitoring review and site visit is also conducted for all funded projects funded
which includes
• Employment Income Verification Forms completed for all employees hired or retained
• Proof of payment for all jobs created or maintained
• Balance sheet
• Cash flow statement and 1-year projection
• Certificate of liability insurance for the business
• Summary of loan expenditures and receipts.
CDBG-Public Service & ESG Partners
Subrecipients for CDBG and ESG are monitored continuously throughout the year. All federal
regulations and laws listed in their contracts are monitored including but not limited to Davis
Bacon, Hatch Act, conflict of interest, and procurement guidelines. Additionally, all reimbursement
documentation is carefully reviewed and projects environmentally reviewed before work begins on a
project. Throughout the year, staff attends various events or visit projects to monitor progress and
evaluate contract compliance. During each application cycle, applicants are scored on past history,
capacity, project feasibility, and matching funds etc. Staff maintains a file of each applicants score
card. Inspections also occur for any rehabilitation or maintenance related projects. There is also desk
monitoring and on-site monitoring that occurs annually toward the end of the fiscal year. This ensures
that on site procedures for security and organization are being met. Files and equipment/goods
24
procured are reviewed and documented. Staff also captures intake forms and procedural processes for
client assistance.
Housing Partners:
All housing development projects funded with HOME funds are ‘gap financing’ to ensure that the
projects have sufficient funding to be implemented. The proposals submitted to GCRA for approval
contain total development project, proforma (rental), sources and uses of fund, All construction projects
are inspected by GCRA construction officials to ensure compliance and consistent with contract and
payment request. GCRA staff conducted desk audit and site visit to partners. Annual performance
reports are obtained from partners on all HOME assisted projects. Staff conducts monitoring visits to
review partners' files on projects/programs management and beneficiaries’ data to ensure compliance
with program regulations.
Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to
comment on performance reports.
On September 8, 2018, staff posted a public notice for the draft CAPER in the Greenville News. The draft
of the CAPER summary was published on GCRA’s website on September 14, 2018. A public hearing was
held on September 18, 2018 in GCRA office Board Room and no one attendance. GCRA did not receive
any comments during the public review period from September 14, 2018 through September 28, 2018.
25
CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives
and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its
experiences.
During the Fiscal year 2017, the County did not make any changes its program objectives for
CDBG. However, in August 2018, an amendment was made to expand the boundary jurisdiction for the
Façade improvement program for the unincorporated area to include Woodside, alongside the existing
Poinsett Corridor. Furthermore, marketing plans are being initiated to strategically market the following
programs to increase participation – Owner-occupied Rehabilitation and the Business Loan programs.
GCRA is considering having an investor’s program that will specifically target land lord to rehab and rent
to low and moderate income families – County wide.
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI)
grants?
No
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.
26
CR-50 - HOME 91.520(d)
Include the results of on-site inspections of affordable rental housing assisted under the
program to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations
Please list those projects that should have been inspected on-site this program year based upon
the schedule in §92.504(d). Indicate which of these were inspected and a summary of issues
that were detected during the inspection. For those that were not inspected, please indicate
the reason and how you will remedy the situation.
The GCRA staff has taken in the oversight and management of its rental properties in house. The
addresses listed below reflect rental units that are complete and inspected annually. Any deficiencies
are noted using the International Property Maintenance Code, repaired and reinspected. Inspectors are
either licensed homebuilders or certified ICC housing inspectors. Parker at Cone, a 64 unit apartment
building, is inspected every two years and is scheduled for inspection in October 2018.
Single Family Detached Rental Units
• 7 Saco Street
• 6 Bryant Street
• 130 Marie Street
• 106 2nd Street
• 107 Alice Avenue
• 111 Arnold
• 7 Malone Street
• 3 14th Street
• 324 E. Arlington Avenue
• 6 Hardin Street
• 108 Harris Street
• 106 Lanford
• 511 Trade Street
• 125 Will Street
• 133 Will Street
• 137 Will Street
• 6 D Street
• 105 Goodrich Street
• 106 Heatherly Drive
• 279 Moore
• 321 Tremont Avenue
• 31 Norwood Street
• 15 Speed Street
• 114 Westwood Drive
• 105 Hodgens
27
Single Family Attached Units (Brutontown, 5 Duplex Buildings)
• 10 Marie Street
• 12 Marie Street
• 18 Marie Street
• 20 Marie Street
• 110 Marie Street
• 112 Marie Street
• 114 Marie Street
• 116 Marie Street
• 120 Marie Street
• 122 Marie Street
Provide an assessment of the jurisdiction's affirmative marketing actions for HOME units.
92.351(b)
GCRA sells its homes built with HOME funds by listing them with local realtors who specialize in working
with first time homebuyers that are within the low to moderate income range. In addition to the
information on GCRA’s website, we also sell homes as a result of receiving referrals from GCRA
homeowners and also from housing partners including Homes of Hope, United Housing Connection, The
Greenville Housing Authority, and Greenville County Human Relations Commission.
GCRA manages all of its rental units. Tenants are referred to us from area shelters, United Way, and
other local organizations. Our units are also placed on the GCRA website. We keep a list of individuals
and families requesting rental units and as units become available, we place the tenants accordingly.
As there is a high demand for both our homeownership and rental units, they are filled as soon as they
become available.
Refer to IDIS reports to describe the amount and use of program income for projects,
including the number of projects and owner and tenant characteristics
During Fiscal 2017, GCRA expended approximately $460,138 in HOME program income. These Program
Income funds were used in combination with the HOME grant fund to provide a total of 19 housing
units . HOME program income was not used for the Habitat – CHDO funded project and the First Time
Home buyers program.
28
Describe other actions taken to foster and maintain affordable housing. 91.220(k) (STATES
ONLY: Including the coordination of LIHTC with the development of affordable housing).
91.320(j)
• Gap financing to affordable housing providers and developers for new housing construction and
rehabilitation projects for low and moderate income households. All subsidy agreements include
a period of affordability clause based on program affordability requirements.
• Homeowner grants under the Minor Home Repair program for minor repairs to single family
dwellings not exceeding $10,000 in expenses related to prolonging the structure’s useful life
and/or improving handicap accessibility.
• Rehab loans to improve the substandard housing stock of low and moderate income
homeowners in Greenville County.
CR-60 - ESG 91.520(g) (ESG Recipients only)
ESG Supplement to the CAPER in e-snaps
For Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Recipient Information—All Recipients Complete Basic Grant Information
Recipient Name GREENVILLE COUNTY
Organizational DUNS Number 077991206
EIN/TIN Number 576000356
Indentify the Field Office COLUMBIA
Identify CoC(s) in which the recipient or
subrecipient(s) will provide ESG assistance
Greenville/Anderson/Spartanburg Upstate CoC
ESG Contact Name
Prefix Mr
First Name Douglas
Middle Name 0
Last Name Dent
Suffix 0
Title Interim Executive Director
ESG Contact Address
Street Address 1 301 University Ridge
Street Address 2 Suite 2500
City Greenville
State SC
ZIP Code -
29
Phone Number 8642429801
Extension 114
Fax Number 0
Email Address [email protected]
ESG Secondary Contact
Prefix Mrs
First Name Imma
Last Name Nwobodu
Suffix 0
Title Program Manager
Phone Number 8642429801
Extension 115
Email Address [email protected]
2. Reporting Period—All Recipients Complete
Program Year Start Date 07/01/2017
Program Year End Date 06/30/2018
3a. Subrecipient Form – Complete one form for each subrecipient
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: GREENVILLE COUNTY
City: Greenville
State: SC
Zip Code: 29601, 3636
DUNS Number: 077991206
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Unit of Government
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 63043
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: GREENVILLE COUNTY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
City: Greenville
State: SC
Zip Code: 29601, 3613
DUNS Number:
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Unit of Government
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 25000
30
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: United Ministries
City: Greenville
State: SC
Zip Code: 29601, 3320
DUNS Number: 163028392
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Faith-Based Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 60000
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: SHARE
City: Greenville
State: SC
Zip Code: 29603, 0204
DUNS Number: 039283668
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 11657
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Step by Step Ministry Hope Project
City: Greenville
State: SC
Zip Code: 29609, 4256
DUNS Number: 969428130
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 30916
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: United Housing Connections
City: Greenville
State: SC
Zip Code: 29607,
DUNS Number:
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 14525
31
CR-65 - Persons Assisted
4. Persons Served
4a. Complete for Homelessness Prevention Activities
Number of Persons in
Households
Total
Adults 11
Children 13
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
Total 24
Table 16 – Household Information for Homeless Prevention Activities
4b. Complete for Rapid Re-Housing Activities
Number of Persons in
Households
Total
Adults 60
Children 40
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
Total 100
Table 17 – Household Information for Rapid Re-Housing Activities
4c. Complete for Shelter
Number of Persons in
Households
Total
Adults 795
Children 257
Don't Know/Refused/Other 22
Missing Information 0
Total 1,074
Table 18 – Shelter Information
32
4d. Street Outreach
Number of Persons in
Households
Total
Adults 1,626
Children 3
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
Total 1,629
Table 19 – Household Information for Street Outreach
4e. Totals for all Persons Served with ESG
Number of Persons in
Households
Total
Adults 2,492
Children 313
Don't Know/Refused/Other 22
Missing Information 0
Total 2,827
Table 20 – Household Information for Persons Served with ESG
5. Gender—Complete for All Activities
Total
Male 1,752
Female 1,064
Transgender 4
Don't Know/Refused/Other 7
Missing Information 0
Total 2,827
Table 21 – Gender Information
33
6. Age—Complete for All Activities
Total
Under 18 311
18-24 78
25 and over 2,415
Don't Know/Refused/Other 23
Missing Information 0
Total 2,827
Table 22 – Age Information
7. Special Populations Served—Complete for All Activities
Number of Persons in Households
Subpopulation Total Total Persons
Served –
Prevention
Total Persons
Served – RRH
Total
Persons
Served in
Emergency
Shelters
Veterans 28 1 4 23
Victims of Domestic
Violence 150 0 4 146
Elderly 50 3 12 35
HIV/AIDS 8 0 0 8
Chronically Homeless 70 0 0 70
Persons with Disabilities:
Severely Mentally
Ill 126 0 0 126
Chronic Substance
Abuse 55 0 0 55
Other Disability 164 0 0 164
Total
(Unduplicated if
possible) 651 4 20 627
Table 23 – Special Population Served
34
CR-70 – ESG 91.520(g) - Assistance Provided and Outcomes
10. Shelter Utilization
Number of New Units - Rehabbed 0
Number of New Units - Conversion 0
Total Number of bed-nights available 14,934
Total Number of bed-nights provided 12,800
Capacity Utilization 85.71%
Table 24 – Shelter Capacity
11. Project Outcomes Data measured under the performance standards developed in
consultation with the CoC(s)
All of our subrecipients are also members of COC. All COC members meet monthly to discuss the
homeless needs such as outreach activities, housing/shelter needs and support services. Efforts are
coordinated between the members.
A Place of Hope – United Ministries received $60,000. This agency provided day shelter, shelter for
families and street outreach for homeless people, of which 2090 persons were assisted with basic
services including, food, shelter, clothing assistance and also case management services. Interfaith
Hospitality Network provided both emergency and interim housing for families with children, 38 families
were assisted. Their matching private funding sources were Outreach activities for $15,000 and Shelter
for $45,000.
United Housing Connections (UHC) provides shelter services to individuals. The UHC utilized a total
of $9,525 ESG funding allocation to provide intake and referral for housing. They completed 320 VI-
SPDAT assessments serving 553 persons with intake and referral services to facilitate the allocation of
housing opportunities to those who are most vulnerable. UHC's matching funds were $9,525 for shelter
essential services.
SHARE leveraged its $11,657 allocation to provide assistant 29 clients. SHARE provided shelter facility
support by replacing the washer and dryer, and flooring in 2 units, and replacing the kitchen sink
cabinets in 4 units. Additional assistance to clients included food vouchers, bus tickets to work,
transportation to doctor's appointments. Furthermore 4 homeless families moved into permanent
housing. Private funding sources matched their ESG funds with $8,000 for essential services and $3,657
for operations.
35
Step by Step Ministry Hope Project, expended $18,761 for their group home residence. The program
assisted 31 women coming out of prison and would be homeless without assistance. Step by Step
Ministry matching total was $28,559.
Greenville County Human Relations (GCHR) provides casemangement and HPRP services. They
conducted the intake of the clients to establish eligibility for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing
activities. The GCHR was provided a total of $25,000 for the services and as a result assisted a total
of 124 individuals. Greenville County General Fund was used to match their ESG of $25,000
for Prevention and Rapid Rehousing case management services.
Greenville County Redevelopment Authority provided to third party agencies direct assistance
for housing deposits, rent assistance or utilities for a total of $63,043. Greenville County General Fund
was the matching fund.
36
CR-75 – Expenditures
11. Expenditures
11a. ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2015 2016 2017
Expenditures for Rental Assistance 0 0 0
Expenditures for Housing Relocation and
Stabilization Services - Financial Assistance 20,003 43,250 20,460
Expenditures for Housing Relocation &
Stabilization Services - Services 10,000 12,500 12,500
Expenditures for Homeless Prevention under
Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0
Subtotal Homelessness Prevention 30,003 55,750 32,960
Table 25 – ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention
11b. ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2015 2016 2017
Expenditures for Rental Assistance 0 0 0
Expenditures for Housing Relocation and
Stabilization Services - Financial Assistance 30,115 33,960 25,495
Expenditures for Housing Relocation &
Stabilization Services - Services 10,000 12,500 12,500
Expenditures for Homeless Assistance under
Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0
Subtotal Rapid Re-Housing 40,115 46,460 37,995
Table 26 – ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing
11c. ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2015 2016 2017
Essential Services 42,330 5,981 36,286
Operations 42,978 56,519 37,052
Renovation 15,918 7,100 11,605
37
Major Rehab 8,964 11,900 0
Conversion 0 0 0
Subtotal 110,190 81,500 84,943
Table 27 – ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter
11d. Other Grant Expenditures
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2015 2016 2017
Street Outreach 16,238 13,500 15,000
HMIS 3,077 2,500 2,500
Administration 16,181 16,223 16,430
Table 28 - Other Grant Expenditures
11e. Total ESG Grant Funds
Total ESG Funds Expended 2015 2016 2017
621,565 215,804 215,933 189,828
Table 29 - Total ESG Funds Expended
11f. Match Source
2015 2016 2017
Other Non-ESG HUD Funds 182,400 0 142,906
Other Federal Funds 734,308 186,684 186,864
State Government 0 143,500 0
Local Government 0 25,000 0
Private Funds 154,094 215,280 358,807
Other 80,878 206,118 215,985
Fees 51,103 32,623 92,044
Program Income 0 0 0
Total Match Amount 1,202,783 809,205 996,606
Table 30 - Other Funds Expended on Eligible ESG Activities
38
11g. Total
Total Amount of Funds
Expended on ESG
Activities
2015 2016 2017
3,630,159 1,418,587 1,025,138 1,186,434
Table 31 - Total Amount of Funds Expended on ESG Activities
ESG Sub Recipient ESG Amount Match Amount Source of Match
SHARE 11,657 11,657 private donations
Step By Step 18,761 28,559 private
UHC 60,0000 9,525 private
United Ministries 25,000 60,000 private donations
Human Relations 25,000 25,000 Greenville county general fund
GCRA 63,043 63,043 Greenville county general match fund
Table 14 - ESG Sub recipient Match Source Funds
39
Attachment
Greenville County CAPER Cover page
40
41
PR- 26 CDBG Financial Summary Report
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
PHIHCPDHousing
Grant/Project Number or HUD Case Number or other
identification of property, subdivision, dwelling unit, etc.
7a.
Amount of Contract or Subcontact
7b.
Type of Trade Code
(See below) 7c.
Contractor or Subcontractor
Business Racial/Ethnic (See below)
7d.
Woman Owned Business (Yes or No)
7e.
Prime Contractor Identification (ID) Number
7f.Sec. 3
7g.
Subcontractor Identification (ID)
Number 7h
Sec. 3 7i.
State ZipM17-UC-45-0205 103,400 1 1 No 57-1039633 No SC 29687M17-UC-45-0205 17,450 1 1 No 57-1039633 No
B17-UC-45-0001 10,000 4 1 No 57-1059164 No SC 29681
B17-UC-45-0001 15,000 4 1 Yes 57-0931840 No SC 29603
M17-UC-45-0205 115,000 4 2 Yes 26-0421563 No SC 29607
B17-UC-45-0001 82,535 5 1 No 57-0535108 No SC 29601
B17-UC-45-0001 10,000 4 2 No 58-2061227 No SC 29652
B17-UC-45-0001 48,300 0 1 No 56-0897274 No SC 29171
M17-UC-45-0205 105,800 1 2 No 26-0729140 Yes SC 29615M17-UC-45-0205 104,500 1 2 No 26-0729140 Yes
B17-UC-45-0001 80,000 4 1 Yes 57-0855205 No SC 29604
CPD:1 = New Construction 6 = Professional
2 = Education/Training 7 = Tenant Services3 = Other 8 = Education/Training
0 = Other
Greenville, SC 29601
Douglas Dent
Greenville Free Medical Clinic PO Box 8993 Greenville
864-242-9801 Oct. 1 - Sept. 30 (Annual -FY)
Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j.
Name Street CityApostolic Construction, Inc 306 Wood River Way Taylors
Greenville County Redevelopment Authority Suite 2500
Contract and Subcontract Activity U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No.: 2577-0088 OMB Approval No.: 2502-0355
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The Information is voluntary. HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
Executive Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities against the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development. If the information is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals.
Privacy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or relesed outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or permitted by Law.
Check if:301 University Ridge
GreenvilleCommunities in Schools PO Box 10308
Center for Community Service 1102 Howard Dr Simpsonville
Craig, Gaulden & Davis, Inc 19 Washington Park Greenville
Creative Advancement Centers PO Box 2474 Greer
Greenville
7c: Type of Trade Codes: 7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes: 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only):
DH Griffen PO Box 3046 West Columbia
Durham Home Services, Inc 110A Darrell Dr
5 = Section 2021 = New Construction 2 = Black Americans 2= Flexible Subsidy 6 = HUD-Held (Management)
2 = Substantial Rehab. 3 = Native Americans 3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Non-HFDA 7 = Public/India Housing
Community Works Carolina 107 W Atrum Greenville
Previous editions are obsolete. form HUD-2516 (8/98)
4 = Service 9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans5 = Project Mangt. 6 = Hasidic Jews
3 = Repair 4 = Hispanic Americans 4 = Insured (Management) 8 = Section 811
Housing/Public Housing: 1 = White Americans 1 = All Insured, including Section8
1. Grantee/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency
3a. Name of Contact Person 3b. Phone Number (Including Area Code) 4. Reporting Period 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See explanation of Codes at bottom of Page Use a separate sheet for each program code.
6. Date Submitted to Field Office
2. Location (City, State Zip Code)
52
PHIHCPDHousing
Grant/Project Number or HUD Case Number or other
identification of property, subdivision, dwelling unit, etc.
7a.
Amount of Contract or Subcontact
7b.
Type of Trade Code
(See below) 7c.
Contractor or Subcontractor
Business Racial/Ethnic (See below)
7d.
Woman Owned Business (Yes or No)
7e.
Prime Contractor Identification (ID) Number
7f.Sec. 3
7g.
Subcontractor Identification (ID)
Number 7h
Sec. 3 7i.
State ZipB17-UC-45-0001 15,000 4 1 Yes 23-7279894 No SC 29652
M17-UC-45-0205 128,648 1 1 No 57-0827063 No SC 29602
M17-UC-45-0205 16,185 3 1 No 57-0987402 Yes SC 29605B17-UC-45-0001 23,585 3 1 No YesB17-UC-45-0001 13,430 3 1 No YesB17-UC-45-0001 21,925 3 1 No YesB17-UC-45-0001 24,315 3 1 No YesM17-UC-45-0205 24,980 3 1 No Yes
B17-UC-45-0001 35,000 4 2 Yes 57-6000356 No SC 29601
B17-UC-45-0001 36,092 0 1 No 46-3353592 No SC 29644
B17-UC-45-0001 45,355 5 1 No 57-0621794 No SC 29606
B17-UC-45-0001 10,500 4 1 No 57-0944841 No SC 29662
B17-UC-45-0001 60,000 4 1 Yes 57-0531378 Yes SC 29605
CPD:1 = New Construction 6 = Professional
2 = Education/Training 7 = Tenant Services3 = Other 8 = Education/Training
0 = Other
Hellams and Assoc Builders 7 Horseshoe Cir Greenville
Greenville Human Relations 301 University Ridge, ste 1600 Greenville
5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only):
MauldinMauldin Foundation
7c: Type of Trade Codes:
Greenville15 Oregon StMeals on Wheels
Industrial Power Corporation 503 N Weston St Fountain Inn
Contract and Subcontract Activity
Greenville County Redevelopment Authority
Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j.
Name Street City
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Check if:
OMB Approval No.: 2577-0088 OMB Approval No.: 2502-0355
Executive Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities against the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development. If the information is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The Information is voluntary. HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
864-242-9801 Oct. 1 - Sept. 30 (Annual -FY)Douglas Dent
PO Box 249
Privacy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or relesed outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or permitted by Law.
Previous editions are obsolete. form HUD-2516 (8/98)
Suite 2500
PO Box 1373
Habitat for Humanity PO Box 1206 Greenville
Housing/Public Housing:2= Flexible Subsidy1 = All Insured, including Section8 5 = Section 202
6 = HUD-Held (Management)2 = Black Americans1 = New Construction
GreerGreer Community Ministries
301 University Ridge
Greenville, SC 29601
JL Rogers & Colcott PO Box 5655 Greenville
7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes:
1 = White Americans
5 = Project Mangt.4 = Service
6 = Hasidic Jews
2 = Substantial Rehab.3 = Repair
3 = Native Americans4 = Hispanic Americans
9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans8 = Section 8114 = Insured (Management)
3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Non-HFDA 7 = Public/India Housing
1. Grantee/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency
3a. Name of Contact Person 3b. Phone Number (Including Area Code) 4. Reporting Period 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See explanation of Codes at bottom of Page Use a separate sheet for each program code.
6. Date Submitted to Field Office
2. Location (City, State Zip Code)
53
PHIHCPDHousing
Grant/Project Number or HUD Case Number or other
identification of property, subdivision, dwelling unit, etc.
7a.
Amount of Contract or Subcontact
7b.
Type of Trade Code
(See below) 7c.
Contractor or Subcontractor
Business Racial/Ethnic (See below)
7d.
Woman Owned Business (Yes or No)
7e.
Prime Contractor Identification (ID) Number
7f.Sec. 3
7g.
Subcontractor Identification (ID)
Number 7h
Sec. 3 7i.
State ZipB17-UC-45-0001 14,920 2 1 No 42-1606557 No SC 29301
B17-UC-45-0001 55,000 3 1 No 20-8296408 Yes SC 29601B17-UC-45-0001 30,000 3 1 No Yes
B17-UC-45-0001 15,000 4 2 Yes 20-4593516 Yes SC 29605
CPD:1 = New Construction 6 = Professional
2 = Education/Training 7 = Tenant Services3 = Other 8 = Education/Training
0 = Other
Upstae Circle of Friends 29 Ridgeway Dr Greenville
MP Services 400 Kent St Spartanburg
Rebuild Upstate 601 Green Ave Greenville
5 = Project Mangt. 6 = Hasidic Jews
Previous editions are obsolete. form HUD-2516 (8/98)
3 = Repair 4 = Hispanic Americans 4 = Insured (Management) 8 = Section 8114 = Service 9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans
1 = New Construction 2 = Black Americans 2= Flexible Subsidy 6 = HUD-Held (Management)
2 = Substantial Rehab. 3 = Native Americans 3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Non-HFDA 7 = Public/India Housing
7c: Type of Trade Codes: 7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes: 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only):Housing/Public Housing: 1 = White Americans 1 = All Insured, including Section8 5 = Section 202
Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j.
Name Street City
Greenville, SC 29601
Stanley Wilson 864-242-9801 Oct. 1 - Sept. 30 (Annual -FY)
Greenville County Redevelopment Authority Suite 2500
Contract and Subcontract Activity U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No.: 2577-0088 OMB Approval No.: 2502-0355
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The Information is voluntary. HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
Executive Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities against the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development. If the information is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals.
Privacy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or relesed outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or permitted by Law.
Check if:301 University Ridge
1. Grantee/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency
3a. Name of Contact Person 3b. Phone Number (Including Area Code) 4. Reporting Period 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See explanation of Codes at bottom of Page Use a separate sheet for each program code.
6. Date Submitted to Field Office
2. Location (City, State Zip Code)
54