Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

download Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

of 13

Transcript of Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    1/13

    Strategies in,around & after LTE When a lot

    enough!

    Bill Payne CTO Motorola Networks

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    2/13

    CDMA: Meeting Challenges 2020 1990 2010 2000 Networks Build-out

    Capacity Evolution

    Data Explosion Challenges Beyond Bearer Traffic

    Crunch

    Global mobile data usage growthestimates range from 20% to 40%year on year until at least 2014Sources: ABI and Cisco Visual Networking Index Forecast

    Todays 2G/3G networks mustevolve to meet data growth

    & Expansion

    5-10x Signaling Traffic

    30% Session Capacity

    12x Backhaul

    10% Forward Link UseSource: Motorola & Morgan Stanley Research Source: Motorola and Industry Sources

    StandardHandsets

    D a

    t a p e r D

    e v

    i c e

    ( M B )

    C a

    l l A t t e m p

    t s p e r

    D e v

    i c e

    PDADeviceD

    a t a C ar d

    s

    T o d a y s

    S m ar t ph

    on

    e s

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    3/13

    3

    )

    LTELa to s

    80%+ of Data TrafficConsumption still comes from

    Early LTE Deployment. Following the Traffic

    0

    1

    2

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

    S u

    b s c r i

    b e r s

    (

    3 GB45%

    LTEMobiles

    HSPA Mobiles

    HSPALaptops

    4.6 GB81%

    5.4 GB95%

    GB / MonthPenetration

    0.9 GB12%

    Early LTE can help free up 3G/HSPAcapacity for smartphones onslaught Limit cell splitting and legacy CAPEX Better user experience across the board

    Offload 3G/HSPA Laptop Traffic to LTE Early availability of LTE dongles Cheaper to swap Bigger off-load

    * Mobiles include Smartphones and Dongles

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    4/13

    Clear Biz Case for LTECapacity Upgrade Cost on HSPA

    => Very Costly Cell Splitting

    15MHz HSPA R6

    Cell Sites

    4,000HPSA+ 64QAM

    Capacity upgrade cost on LTE=> LTE overlay in existing sitesInitial LTE deployment in every other HSPA

    Sites (Lower ISD in Urban Areas)+LTE 10 MHz

    HSPA R6

    +LTE 20 MHz

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    Maximise HSPA without additional CAPEX and Deploy LTE to address Capacity Crunch

    Cell Site Model for 3GB/month in 2011(50% penetration) &

    5.5GB/month in 2015 (90% penetration)

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    5/13

    2Tx/2RxAdvanced ReceiverProcessing + Intelligent

    4Tx/8Rx

    EUTRAN Most Advanced SolutionsIRC &2Tx/4RxBaseline

    Prevent Future Cell Split

    20% Higher Capacity15% Higher CoverageAverage

    2X2

    200% HigherCapacity40% HigherCoverage

    40% HigherCapacity30% HigherCoverage

    20% lower TCO than averageLTE eNodeB

    30% lower TCO thanaverage LTE eNodeB

    Standardsolution2Tx/2RX

    Cellsplitting

    Cellsplitting

    Cellsplitting

    Cellsplitting

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    6/13

    LTE Every MHz CountsMaximizes Sector Throughput with LTE

    LTE in 2.5MHz 1 HSPA 5MHz CarrierDual Spectrum Deployment Advantage

    Capacity and User Experience

    5 102.5

    3.8 7.85

    Carrier BW (MHz)

    3.7

    L T E

    H S P A +

    16.7

    Provide Spectrum Capacity ReliefOffload indoor users to 2 nd carrier

    Better indoor penetration means reduced RFresource impact

    Improved Sector Throughput andCoverage (Scheduler Algorithm and Receiver

    Quality impact)Dual Carrier / Multi- spectrum BTS is KEY

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    7/13

    Operators require acost-effective

    Todays Network Challenges

    strategy to address CAPACITY

    &

    COVERAGE

    HETEROGENEOUS NETWORK

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    8/13

    Identical Coverage to LTE FDDCommon resource block size transmitting the same

    power over the same time

    TD-LTE adaptable ratio Advantage (10MHz FDD and 20MHZ TDD)

    30

    35

    40

    TD-LTE AlternativeSignificant Additional

    Throughput

    Performance - Spectral Efficiency

    Adaptable Traffic RatioTDD better suited to handle REAL LIFE traffic imbalance

    Less than 2-3% impact difference between FDD andTDD experience, due to DL/UL signalling requirement

    Seamless Hand-over to LTE FDDCapacity Relieve and Overlay

    Coverage Indoor and Hot Spots

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    50/50 60/40 70/30 80/20 90/10DL/UL Ratio

    T h r o u g h p u t s M b p s

    FDD Downlink FDD Uplink Total FDD Throughput

    TDD Downlink TDD Uplink Total TDD Throughput

    Capacity Arsenal in Operator Portfolio

    Uplink

    Downlink

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    9/13

    Future - HeterogeneousToday Traditional

    Coverage Macro Pico Metro

    Wireless Topology Evolution

    Dense Urban

    Urban/SuburbanRural

    3G/LTENetwork

    LegacyNetworkTransport PoP Street Level

    Cost effective capacity augmentationStreet Level

    Cost effective capacity augmentation

    CapacityMacro Macro Wi-Fi

    In BuildingCompetitive and alternativeIn Building

    Competitive and alternative

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    10/13

    Self OrganisingSmall Cell ChallengesManaging Heterogeneous Networks

    Key to addressing challenges

    Higher Volume of Nodes will require newManagement Paradigm to providefavorable business case vs. Macro

    Collaboration to Maximize SpectralEfficiencies will be key (ICIC)

    Backhaul Connection

    Quality of Service

    Traffic Re-Transmissions

    Multiple Air-Interface Management

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    11/13

    UplinkDownlink

    Femto Cell

    Femto UE

    Femto Cell

    UplinkDownlink

    Relay#2

    Relay

    Managing Interference in Multiple Networks

    Macro ellacro e

    Desired Signal

    Interference Signal

    Macro UE

    Macro CellMacro Cell

    Desired Signal

    Interference Signal

    Macro UE #1

    Low Power Node Expansion Advanced Receivers Acquisition structures need to be modified

    Heterogeneous Deployments Strong Interference scenarios Operation in low geometry environments Interference Co-ordination Techniques (ICIC) tomitigate Interference

    ICIC for Maximum GainControl Carrier Aggregation and Beam Forming Macro and Pico cell transmit on two different carrier frequency, with

    Macro also supporting two different power levelsData Resource partitioning Frequency domain: Carrier Aggregation techniques, RB silencing Time Domain: MBSFN sub frames Semi-static vs. Dynamic

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    12/13

    Tomorrows Networks

    Early LTE DeploymentAvoid HSPA Cell Splitting CAPEX and relieve capacity crunch

    Every MHz and EUTRAN feature counts for coverage and capacity

    Exploding Data Demand

    Bearer and Control Traffic Challenges

    Capacity growth demands new solutions

    Self Organising NetworkCritical for End-to-End Heterogeneous Networks Management

    Simple and Optimized Network Management Solution

    Heterogeneous networksThe Ultimate solution - augmenting existing capacity and coverage

    Maximizing network assets and enabling new revenues with smaller cells

    Growing Global Momentum and cheaper $/MHz Spectrum

    Similar Performance, Roaming, and Flexible UL:DL ProvisioningTD-LTE Alternative

  • 7/31/2019 Bill Payne- Motorola- LTE Strategy

    13/13

    THANK YOU THANK YOU