Bilateral Listening Skills Profile
description
Transcript of Bilateral Listening Skills Profile
![Page 1: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Bilateral Listening Skills ProfileUK National Paediatric Bilateral Audit.
Devyanee Bele11 April 2013
![Page 2: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Aims
• Background
• Audit data
• Analysis
• Take home message
![Page 3: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Background
• Developed by Ear Foundation
• Questions taken from Infant Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (Zimmerman-Philips et al) and paediatric version of Speech Spatial Qualities (Reeder & Firszt 2006)
• Assesses listening skills mostly in adverse listening conditions
![Page 4: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background cont
![Page 5: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Audit data0 pre CI 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr
SIM not applicable
√ √ √
SEQ √ √ √ √
![Page 6: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Analysis
• Themes extracted after factor analysis
Speech
Quality
Localisation
![Page 7: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Analysis
• Comparison of SIM and SEQ group across test intervals
• Comparison of unilateral and bilateral group against ‘time in sound’
![Page 9: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
n= 308 186 263 81 137 22 32
![Page 10: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
n= 293 165 244 75 127 19 32
![Page 11: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
n= 292 171 246 74 130 20 30
![Page 12: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
n= 165 8 75 16 19 37
![Page 13: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
n= 186 8 81 19 22 37
![Page 14: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
n= 171 8 74 18 20 34
![Page 15: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Take Home Message
(1) Comparison of SIM vs SEQ across test intervals : no difference between SIM and SEQ group
(2) Comparison of bilaterals vs unilaterals across ‘time in sound’ : bilateral group is significantly better than unilateral group
![Page 16: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Parent Outcome Profile questionnaireUK National Paediatric Bilateral
Audit.
Devyanee Bele11 April 2013
![Page 17: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Acknowledgement
Robin Gransier, Erasmus student
University of Leuven
![Page 18: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Aims
• Background
• Audit data
• Analysis
• Take home message
![Page 19: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Background
• Developed by Archbold et al (2002)
• 74 questions and different themes (e.g. communication, process of implantation etc )
• Issues important for parents rather than what professionals feel is important
• High test-retest reliability
![Page 20: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Background cont
![Page 21: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Audit data0 pre CI 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr
SIM not applicable
√ limited data (<30)
not applicable
SEQ √ √ limited data(<30)
not applicable
Consortium decided to stop use of POP/POP2
in April 2011
POP2- allowed parents to compare outcome of 1CI to
both CIs
![Page 22: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Analysis
• Themes extracted after factor analysis
education and social adjustment
communication
family relationships
![Page 23: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Analysis cont
• Effect of 2nd CI (i.e. improvement attributed to 2nd CI)
• Relationship between this improvement and the age of implantation for 2nd CI
![Page 25: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
My child received benefit from the 2nd CI
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N=115
![Page 26: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Relationship of benefit & age at implantation of 2nd CI
Subjects : included seq children who had 1st CI < 5yrs of age
Divided into 3 groups based on age at 2nd CI
1. children who had 2nd CI < 5yrs
2. children had 2nd CI between 5-10 yrs of age
3. children who had 2nd CI between 10-15 yrs of age
![Page 27: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
My child received benefit from the 2nd CI
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N 33 68 27
![Page 28: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
My child received benefit from the 2nd CI
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N 33 68 27
![Page 29: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
My child received benefit from the 2nd CI
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N 33 68 27
![Page 30: Bilateral Listening Skills Profile](https://reader037.fdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110103/56814354550346895dafd02f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Take Home Message• For all themes of POP (communication, family
relationships and education & social adjustment)
(1)Children show significant improvement with two CIs compared to one CI
(2)Children who receive 2nd CI before 5 yrs of age do significantly better compared to children who received 2nd CI at 5-10 yrs and 10-15 yrs of age