Beyond Negativity

2
 George Smith September 26, 2012 Beyond Negativity Do you remember the days of elementary school when you and Timmy the oversized fourth grader use to go back and forth calling each other silly names? Politicians in today s society practically do the same thing which is known as incivility. Incivility hinders our electoral  process, which we as citizens observe from time to time during political elections, by means of drifting the electorate off course of politics in order to be disrespectful and show the other candidate out. The main e yebrow raising question this issue draws is, how does it affect us as citizens that vote how we interpret information from politicians and make cognitive decisions?  Research conducted by numerous ex perts in the field attempts to capture desire data to hold up to the theory that incivility indeed effects the public. The research that took place contained three different scenarios (Negative vs. Positive, Issue vs. Trait, and Civil Negative vs. Uncivil Negative) which analyzed the issue basically from every angle. The experiment entailed the respondent to read three statements randomly assigned to them from one of the six categories and then answer three questions regarding what they read. From the researcher ’s perspective, the hypothesis that if the manipulations worked then differences should be present among respondents from different scenarios is th e main objective to actually prove. Results in some cases es sentially showed positive correlati on toward the hypothesis by a slightly significant amount. In entirety, the combination of result proved the hypothesis neither true nor false as across the boa rd the variation in differences between categories was nearly concurrent. This data in turn makes it seem as if citizens do not care whether the candidates insult each other or not. In reality the citizens do actually care about what is being said to a certain ex tent and at the present time of o bservation, but do not tend to cling on to it for long. With the research conducted, there is still mystery to whether or not in civility actually affects citizens in regards to political involvement. No matter what the talk is, citizens are pretty resilient despite the harsh comments politicians hurl back and forth and will not alter their trust or efficacy in a candidate. It is greatly possible that the negativity can impose an effect on interest in politics and also the chances of someone voting, which is currently an issue in today s American society. So ultimately, are we as citizens to blame for the negativity in po litics since we merely observe it and shrug it off as a peck of dirt on the table cloth instead of appealing to it and frowning upon such behavior and tactics?

description

My insight to how political negativity impacts voter's decisions in today's superficial society.

Transcript of Beyond Negativity

  • George Smith

    September 26, 2012

    Beyond Negativity

    Do you remember the days of elementary school when you and Timmy the oversized

    fourth grader use to go back and forth calling each other silly names? Politicians in todays

    society practically do the same thing which is known as incivility. Incivility hinders our electoral

    process, which we as citizens observe from time to time during political elections, by means of

    drifting the electorate off course of politics in order to be disrespectful and show the other

    candidate out. The main eyebrow raising question this issue draws is, how does it affect us as

    citizens that vote how we interpret information from politicians and make cognitive decisions?

    Research conducted by numerous experts in the field attempts to capture desire data to hold up to

    the theory that incivility indeed effects the public.

    The research that took place contained three different scenarios (Negative vs. Positive,

    Issue vs. Trait, and Civil Negative vs. Uncivil Negative) which analyzed the issue basically from

    every angle. The experiment entailed the respondent to read three statements randomly assigned

    to them from one of the six categories and then answer three questions regarding what they read.

    From the researchers perspective, the hypothesis that if the manipulations worked then

    differences should be present among respondents from different scenarios is the main objective

    to actually prove. Results in some cases essentially showed positive correlation toward the

    hypothesis by a slightly significant amount. In entirety, the combination of result proved the

    hypothesis neither true nor false as across the board the variation in differences between

    categories was nearly concurrent. This data in turn makes it seem as if citizens do not care

    whether the candidates insult each other or not. In reality the citizens do actually care about what

    is being said to a certain extent and at the present time of observation, but do not tend to cling on

    to it for long.

    With the research conducted, there is still mystery to whether or not incivility actually

    affects citizens in regards to political involvement. No matter what the talk is, citizens are pretty

    resilient despite the harsh comments politicians hurl back and forth and will not alter their trust

    or efficacy in a candidate. It is greatly possible that the negativity can impose an effect on

    interest in politics and also the chances of someone voting, which is currently an issue in todays

    American society. So ultimately, are we as citizens to blame for the negativity in politics since

    we merely observe it and shrug it off as a peck of dirt on the table cloth instead of appealing to it

    and frowning upon such behavior and tactics?