Bethany Case Study

download Bethany Case Study

of 25

Transcript of Bethany Case Study

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    1/25

    Lara Albano, Patricia Gelling,Gretchen Kempf, Dominique

    Keogh, Laura Mammato, Megan

    McCarthy, Laura Van

    Volkenburg and Christina Weiss

    May 7, 2013

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    2/25

    Diagnosis: astrocytoma; s/p craniotomy at NYU Date of onset: 12/24/13

    Date of treatment: 2/4/13

    Rehab diagnosis: brain tumor with right internal

    capsule strokeaftersurgery Precautions: falls, diplopia, and foot drop

    Prior level of function: independent in all dailyactivities

    Pt. stated goal: To be a normal person againTo playpiano, swim, and bowl.

    Chief complaint of symptoms: weakness in both UEs,vision difficulties, and difficulty getting aroundoutside and at home.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    3/25

    History of present illness: Pt. underwent a craniotomy at NYU 12/24/12 secondary

    to an aggressive brain tumor

    Pt. suffered a right internal capsule stroke with left

    progressive lower extremity spasticity Brain tumor was diagnosed after MRI secondary to falls,

    rapid onset of upper extremity weakness, and double

    vision

    Tumor was not removed and requires monitoring forincrease growth

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    4/25

    Hand dominance: Right

    Area of pain: posterior shoulder capsule on left and left sideof vertebral border of scapula since the surgery was

    performed

    Nature: dull and achy

    Duration: intermittent Intensity on average: 5-6 out of 10

    PMH: Unremarkable

    Social and Work history: Resides in a two-story home with

    parents and two sisters. Pt. is homeschooled. Mother is homeduring the day. Pt. enjoys swimming, shopping, outdoors,

    playing the piano, and scrapbooking. Pt. has chores she is

    responsible for but unable to do at present time.

    Driving status: non-driver at present time

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    5/25

    PROM in left and right UE is WNL AROM in right UE is WNL for everything except shoulder

    abduction and flexion

    Fair plus L forearm supination/pronation, L wrist radial/ulnardeviation, R shoulder extension, internal rotation and

    external rotation, and R elbow flexion/extension

    Good minus in R forearm pronation/supination, R wristflexion/extension, and R wrist radial/ulnar deviation

    Tone is normal in trunk and left and right UE, and Bethanyhas isolated joint movement with near normal coordination

    Good control of head position in midline

    Sensation is fully intact

    Bethany is independent in: feeding, grooming, clothingmanagement, bed mobility, and toileting.

    Bethany is modified independent in dressing and bathing

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    6/25

    Precautions: Falls; Diplopia; Foot Drop

    Pain: Left posterior shoulder capsule and left side vertebralborder of scapula. Described as dull and achy intermittently

    with an average of 5-6 on the pain scale.

    Movement Analysis: Bilateral weakness in upper extremities

    (left more affected)

    Slight ataxia and delayed fine and gross movement patterns

    Scapular Position: Left-side depressed, protracted,

    downwardly rotated

    Trunk Position: Posterior pelvic tilt. Increased weight bearing

    on right side with elongation there, shortening on left Vision difficulties: diplopia (corrective lenses assist);

    decreased depth perception

    Grasp: Decreased in left hand

    Most affected IADLs: Homemaking tasks and functional

    mobility/transfers

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    7/25

    Shoulder

    Abduction: 0-75 (norm 0-180)

    Flexion: 0-60 (norm 0-180)

    Extension: 0-40 (norm 0-60)

    Internal Rotation: 0-20 (norm0-70)

    External Rotation: 0-35 (norm0-90)

    Elbow

    Flexion/extension: 0-120(norm 0-150)

    Forearm

    Pronation: WFL (norm 0-80)

    Supination: 0-35 (norm 0-80)

    Wrist

    Extension: 0-15 (norm 0-80)

    Flexion: 0-50 (norm 0-80)

    Radial deviation: 0-10 (norm

    0-20) Ulnar deviation: 0-20 (norm 0-

    30)

    Thumb

    Palmar abduction: 0-45

    Radial abduction: 0-35

    MCP: 0-40 (norm 0-50)

    IP: 0-50 (norm 0-80)

    Digits: WFL

    Left UE (involved side) AROM (PROM is WNL)

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    8/25

    Right UE (PROM is WNL)

    Shoulder

    Abduction: 0-145 (norm 0-180)

    Flexion: 0-140 (norm 0-180)

    *Rest of R UE AROM is WNL* Distal Palmar crease measurement and finger opposition

    are WNL

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    9/25

    Left UE Strength (involved side) Right UE Strength

    Fair plus : forearm

    pronation/supination,

    wrist radial/ulnar

    deviation

    Fair: elbowflexion/extension, wrist

    flexion/extension

    Poor minus: shoulder

    flexion/extension,

    shoulder abduction,shoulder internal/external

    rotation

    Good minus : wrist

    flexion/extension, wrist

    radial/ulnar deviation,

    forearm

    pronation/supination Fair plus : elbow

    flexion/extension,

    shoulder extension,

    shoulder internal/external

    rotation Fair: shoulder abduction,

    shoulder flexion

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    10/25

    Fatigue noted throughout ADL evaluation

    ADLs

    Feeding = Independent

    Grooming = Independent UE & LE Dressing = Modified Independence

    Bathing = Modified Independence

    Clothing Management = Independent

    Toileting = Independent

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    11/25

    ADL

    -Functional Mobility = Minimal Assist/Contact

    Guard

    -Bed Transfer = Contact Guard

    -Toilet Transfer = Contact Guard

    -Tub Transfer = Contact Guard

    -Bed Mobility = Independent

    IADLs

    All homemaking tasks (cooking, cleaning,

    laundry, shopping, and financial management)

    required Max Assistance.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    12/25

    Pain Analog Scale

    ROM/MMT

    Trunk and UE Neurological Assessment

    normal tone on right and left sideModified Ashworth Scale for Grading

    Spasticity No increase in muscle tone

    UE Neurological Assessment Head in midline with good control, scapular

    depression, downward rotation and protraction,posterior pelvic tilt and elongation on the rightside.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    13/25

    9 hole peg test Right-45 secs.

    Left-2 min. 10 sec.

    Minnesota Placement Right-2 min. 15 sec.

    Left-5 min. 14 sec.

    FIM

    Visual Screening Has corrective lenses,

    but diplopia is presentwith decreased depthperception

    Hand strength

    gross grasp:

    Right-50 lbs.

    Left-25 lbs.lateral pinch:

    Right-12 lbs.

    Left-4 lbs.

    3 jaw chuck:

    Right-14 lbs.Left-6 lbs.

    tip to tip pinch:

    Right-8 lbs.

    Left-3 lbs.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    14/25

    Berg Functional Balance Scale

    To evaluate Bethanys sitting and standingbalance.

    Beck Depression Inventory 21-question multiple choice self-report inventory

    widely used for measuring depression. This can

    assess Bethanys level of depression and

    psychosocial status after her brain tumor,craniotomy and stroke.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    15/25

    Patient will increase her endurance, requiring less than 3 restbreaks during a therapeutic activity to assist with leisure

    activities.

    Patient will increase tip-to-tip pinch in her L hand by 3-5lbs to

    assist with putting her contacts in.

    Increase bilateral shoulder strength by a half grade to assist with

    UE and LE dressing and transfers.

    Decrease pain from 5/10 to 2/10 to allow more independence in

    overhead dressing and transfers.

    Patient will improve gross grasp of her L hand by 10-15 lbs toincrease from maximum assistance to moderate assistance with

    home chores. Increase AROM in proximal L UE by at least 10-15 degrees to assist

    with engagement in shopping activities.

    Patient will maintain sitting in midline for 2 minutes to increase

    trunk control for playing the piano.

    Increase lateral pinch by 2-3 lbs to assist with scrapbooking.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    16/25

    Patient will increase AROM of her proximal L

    shoulder to WFL to participate in shopping

    activities.

    Patient will be able to independently don and doff

    her bra. Patient will increase functional mobility (bed,

    toilet, tub transfers) from CG to independence.

    Patient will improve from mod to CG in

    homemaking tasks.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    17/25

    Wii bowling.

    Upgrade: Pt will stand for the entirety ofactivity.

    Downgrade: Pt will sit on firm exercise ball.

    Rationale: Pt will engage in Wii bowlinggame as she has previously expressedinterest in the sport Trunk Control

    Posterior pelvic tilt

    Grip strength

    Fatigue

    Increase L UE ROM

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    18/25

    Pt and therapist will go on a shopping outing topts favorite store. Pt will have to try on a shirt,bra, and her choice of bottoms to purchase for abirthday outfit.

    Upgrade: Pt may try on multiple outfits as wellas accessorize (i.e. earrings).

    Downgrade: Pt will only need to try on a bra toavoid fatigue.

    Rationale: Work on pinches (tip to tip & lateral) for jewelry and

    buttons, snaps etc. UE strength and ROM

    UE & LE dressing

    Endurance

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    19/25

    Pt. will participate in a scrapbooking activity, (squeezing

    the glue, holding paper, removing/placing stickers). She willmake a collage of photos and decorate to place in herscrapbook.

    Upgrade: Doing scrapbooking while sitting on the firm

    exercise ball, (instead of chair), to work on posture andposterior pelvic tilt. Using thinner writing materials (pensinstead of markers).

    Downgrade: Use thicker stickers, (foam, etc.), or rub on.Use glue stick instead of squeeze tube glue.

    Rationale: decrease hand weakness

    increase fine motor skills (pinch strengths)

    posterior pelvic tilt/trunk control

    endurance

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    20/25

    Pt. will participate in aquatic therapythrough swimming and using water weights.

    Upgrade: Increase the weight resistance,increase number of repetitions for each

    exercise, exercise in a deeper depth of poolDowngrade: Decrease weight resistance,

    decrease number of repetitions for eachexercise, participate in shallower end of pool

    Rationale: improve left UE ROM

    Endurance

    UE strength

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    21/25

    Pt will make meal of grilled cheese and tomatosoup. She will need to manipulate a triangle canopener and demonstrate kitchen safety whenworking with the stove.

    Upgrade: Therapist will not provide any physicalassistance (i.e. opening cupboards, supplies,etc.)

    Downgrade: Therapist will assist in activity bylaying out the ingredients, loosening jar, andstarting can opening process.

    Rationale: Increase grip strength

    Moving from max assist to min assist incooking/homemaking skills

    Increase AROM of shoulder

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    22/25

    Pt will use an arm bike as well as work withtheraputty.

    Upgrade: Pt will need to increase amount oftime on arm bike and use a higher resistive

    theraputty. Downgrade: Pt will decrease amount of time on

    arm bike and use a lower resistive theraputty.

    Rationale:

    Increase trunk control Increase fine motor skills

    Increase arm strength

    These are needed to increase her participation in theleisure activity of being able to play a 3 minute song onthe piano.

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    23/25

    Activity: Patient will sit upright on an exercise ball while

    reaching only with her left hand for differently weighted

    canned goods on a low-level shelving unit and placing them

    on a countertop.

    Upgrade: Shelves placed at various heights/reaching for

    objects placed in multiple locations (i.e. fridge,

    cupboard)/patient completes activity in standing.

    Downgrade: Patient can be seated on a stationary chair,

    decreasing the number of shelves, decreasing the number

    of objects patient must reach, decreasing the distance

    between the objects on the shelves

    Rationale: Increasing L UE AROM, strength, coordination,grip strength, trunk control and balance, depth perception

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    24/25

    Biomechanical Model: focus on balance,

    strength, ROM, endurance

    Model Of Human Occupation: volition-values,

    interests; habituation-habits, roles (daughter,

    student, sister); performance capacity(occupational participation, performance, and

    skills)

    Motor Control Model: to determine ways for pt to

    create optimal performance in activitiesLifestyle Performance Model: examines

    relationships of the pt to activity patterns to

    reach needs and fulfillment

  • 7/30/2019 Bethany Case Study

    25/25

    American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). The referencemanual of the official documents of the occupational therapyassociation.(14th ed.). Bethesda, MD: The American Occupational TherapyAssociation.

    Becks Depression Inventory. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cawt.com/Site/11/Documents/Members/Evaluation/BeckDe

    pressionInventory1.pdf Berg Balance Test. Retrieved from

    http://www.fallpreventiontaskforce.org/pdf/BergBalanceScale.pdf

    Internet Stroke Center. Berg Balance Scale. Retrieved fromhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/berg.pdf

    Internet Stroke Center. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Retrievedfrom http://www.strokecenter.org/wp-

    content/uploads/2011/08/hamilton.pdf

    Kielhofner, G. (2009). Conceptual Foundations of occupational therapypractice. (4th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company

    Radomski, M.V, Trombly, C.A. (2008). Occupational therapy for physicaldysfunction. 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    http://www.cawt.com/Site/11/Documents/Members/Evaluation/BeckDepressionInventory1.pdfhttp://www.cawt.com/Site/11/Documents/Members/Evaluation/BeckDepressionInventory1.pdfhttp://www.fallpreventiontaskforce.org/pdf/BergBalanceScale.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/berg.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hamilton.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hamilton.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hamilton.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hamilton.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hamilton.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/berg.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/berg.pdfhttp://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/berg.pdfhttp://www.fallpreventiontaskforce.org/pdf/BergBalanceScale.pdfhttp://www.cawt.com/Site/11/Documents/Members/Evaluation/BeckDepressionInventory1.pdfhttp://www.cawt.com/Site/11/Documents/Members/Evaluation/BeckDepressionInventory1.pdf