Best Practices in Nonprofit Impact Measurement , CNM
-
Upload
greenlights -
Category
Business
-
view
1.902 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Best Practices in Nonprofit Impact Measurement , CNM
Best Practices inNP Impact Measurement
Presented by Charlotte Keany, Director of Consulting, and Mary Jones, Consultant
Workshop Objectives
Introduction to an outcomes based program evaluation process
Learn how to develop a logic model
Learn how logic models can be used in program planning and evaluation
Outcomes Based EvaluationWhat is it?
A systematic process to obtain
information on an organization’s activities, its
impacts and the effectiveness of its work, so that it can improve its activities and
describe its accomplishments.Paul W. Mattessich, The Manager’s Guide to Program Evaluation.
Outcomes Based EvaluationWhy is it important?
Determine whether program goals have been met
Refine programs to improve overall effectiveness
Enhance ability to communicate results
Enhance promotion and marketing of a program to the public
Allocate dollars more efficiently
“If you don’t know where you are going, how are you gonna
know when you get there?
Yogi Berra
Outcomes Based Evaluation Steps
Continuous Process
Program Improvement
What is a Logic Model?
A logic model is a framework that helps you design results-based programs.
It is a visual representation of how your program works.
It includes what you put into your program, what you do and what you plan to achieve.
Tells your story and the difference you are making in
the community
Strengthens your case for program investment
Demonstrates accountability to stakeholders
Builds understanding and promotes consensus about what the program is and how it works
Helps with planning, evaluation, implementation and
communications
Why use a Logic Model?
Logic Model Components
Inputs
Activities Outputs Outcomes
Your Planned Work Your Intended Results
INPUTS are materials and resources a program uses in its activities or processes to serve clients.
Elements of a Logic Model
Logic Model Components
Inputs
•Staff
•Volunteers
•Facilities
•Equipment
•Curricula
•Money
Activities Outputs Outcomes
Inputs are resources a program uses to achieve program objectives.
ACTIVITIES are what you do with your resources. The programs and services are designed to meet your clients’ needs and fulfill your mission and vision.
Elements of a Logic Model
Logic Model Components
Inputs
•Staff
•Volunteers
•Facilities
•Equipment
•Curricula
•Money
Activities
•Feed & shelter homeless families
•Provide job training
•Mentor youth
Outputs Outcomes
Inputs are resources a programuses to achieve program objectives.
Activities are what you do with your resources. The programs and services are designed to meet your clients’ needs
and fulfill your mission and vision.
OUTPUTS are units of service regarding your program.
Elements of a Logic Model
Logic Model Components
Inputs
•Staff
•Volunteers
•Facilities
•Equipment
•Curricula
•Money
Activities
•Feed & shelter homeless families
•Provide job training
•Mentor youth
Outputs
•Number of meals served
•Number of counseling sessions conducted
•Number of youth mentored
Outcomes
Inputs are resources a program uses to achieve program objectives.
Activities are what a program does with its inputs; the services it provides to fulfill its mission
Outputs are products of a program’s activities
OUTCOMES are the actual impact benefits for participants during or after their involvement with a program
Elements of a Logic Model
Logic Model Components
Inputs
•Staff
•Volunteers
•Facilities
•Equipment
•Curricula
•Money
Activities
•Feed & sheltering homeless families
•Provide job training
•Mentor youth
Outputs
•Number of meals served
•Number of counseling sessions conducted
•Number of youth mentored
Outcomes
•New Knowledge
•Increased skills
•Changed attitudes or values
•Altered status
Levels of Outcomes
Short-term outcomes – The most immediate benefits or changes participants experience
Intermediate outcomes – Links initial outcomes to the longer-term desired outcomes
Long-term Impact– The ultimate impact a participant will enjoy as a result of participating in a program or services of an organization.
Teen Mother Parenting Education Program
Teen Mother Parenting Education
Inputs
•Pregnant teens
•MSW Program Manager
•RN Instructor
•Education Manuals
•Videos
•Money
Activities
•Parenting classes; two times a week for one hour
•Content: infant nutrition, develop-ment, safety, caretaking
Outputs
•# pregnant teens served
•# high schools partici-pating
•# manuals distributed
Initial Outcomes
•Teen mothers are knowledge-able about prenatal nutrition and health guidelines
Intermediate
Outcomes
•Teen mother follow proper nutrition and health guidelines
•Teen mothers deliver healthy babies
Long-Term Outcomes
•Babies achieve 12 month milestones for physical, motor, verbal, and social development
Follow the Chain of Reasoning
To have a successful, sustainable program . . .
Certain resources/inputs are needed to operate your program.
If you have access to them, then you accomplish your planned activities.
If you accomplish your planned activities, then, you will deliver the products and/or services you intended (outputs).
If you accomplish your planned activities to the extent intended, then your participants will benefit in specific, measurable ways (outcomes).
If these benefits to participants are achieved, then changes in organizations, communities, or systems will occur with positive impact.
The Conceptual Chain
Inputs
•Staff
•Volunteers
•Facilities
•Equipment
•Curricula
•Money
Activities
•Feed & shelter homeless families
•Provide job training
•Mentor youth
Outputs
•Number of meals served
•Number of counseling sessions conducted
•Number of youth mentored
Initial Outcomes
Changes in:•New Knowledge
•Increased skills
•Changed attitudes or values
Intermediate
Outcomes
Changes in behavior resulting from:•New Knowledge
•Increased skills
•Changed attitudes or values
Long-Term Outcomes
Changes resulting in:•Altered status
Teen Smoking Reduction Program
Inputs
•Staff
•Instruction Modules
•Volunteers
•Training of Volunteers
Activities
•One Session Lecture
•Match with volunteer mentor for counseling
Outputs
•Number of youth in lecture
•Number of youth matched with mentors
Initial Outcomes
•Increased knowledge of risks about smoking
•Increased support from mentor to quit smoking
Intermediate
Outcomes
•Youth quit smoking
Long-Term Outcomes
•Youth quit smoking for more than one year
•Less illness
•Longer life expectancy
•Lowered health cost
Outcomes Based Evaluation Steps
Program Improvement
Continuous Process
Step 2: Develop Outcome Indicators
Indicators are specific, observable, measurable characteristics or changes that will represent achievement of the outcome
Indicators are specific statistics (e.g., number/percent) the program will calculate to summarize its level of achievement
Identify Outcome Indicators
Indicators should be: Direct Meaningful Useful Practical to collect Quantitative
Multiple Indicators
Teen Mother Parenting Education Outcome Indicators
Outcomes Indicators Initial Outcome: Teens are knowledgeable of prenatal nutrition and health guidelines
85% of teen mothers are able to identify food items that are a good source of major dietary requirements
Intermediate outcomes: Teens follow proper nutrition and health guidelines
70% of teen mothers are within the proper ranges for prenatal weight gain
95% of teen mothers do not smoke
95% of teen mother eat at least 4 calcium servings and one of each of the other nutritional groups each day
85% of teen mothers take a prenatal vitamin each day
Long Term Outcome: Teens deliver healthy babies
80% of newborns weigh at least 5.5 pounds and score 7 or above on the Apgar scale
Outcomes Based Evaluation Steps
Continuous Process
Program Improvement
Step 3: Collect Data
Identify data sources for your indicators
Design data collection methods
Pretest your data collection instruments and proceduresDocument your procedure
Data Collection Procedures
What data is collected?
How will they collect it? Who collects it? When will they collect it? What do they do with it?
Data Collection Methods:
Interviews Focus Groups Surveys Observation Document review Others (?)
Keep in Mind
20% of the effort
generates
80% of the results
Outcome Measurement Framework
Program Name:
Outcomes Indicators Data Source Data Collection Method
Teen Mother Parenting EducationMeasurement Framework
Program Name: Teen Mother Parenting Education Outcomes Indicators Data Source Data Collection Method
Teens are knowledgeable of prenatal nutrition and health guidelines
85% of teen mothers are able to identify food items that are a good source of major dietary requirements
Participants Self-administered survey after second week in the program
Teens follow proper nutrition and health guidelines
70% of teen mothers are within the proper range for prenatal weight gain
School scales Weekly weigh-ins
95% of teen mothers do not smoke
Participants
Self-report on daily checklist
Teachers Observation reported on weekly record
95% of teen mothers eat at least 4 calcium servings and one of each of the other nutritional groups each day
Participants "Healthy Baby" checklist for recording daily food intake
85% of teen mothers take a prenatal vitamin each day
Participants "Healthy Baby" checklist for recording daily food intake
Teens deliver healthy babies
80% of newborns weigh at least 5.5 pounds and score 7 or above on the Apgar scale
Hospital Records Contact hospital for birth records
Outcomes Based Evaluation Steps
Continuous Process
Program Improvement
Step 4: Analyze Results
Document and summarize data Tabulate results Analyze data
Outcome of Delivering Healthy Babiesby Age of Mother
Age All Participants
Newborn weighed above 5.5 pounds, scored 7 or above on Apgar scale <17 17+ Total Percent of
All
YesNumber 8 5
13 72%% of age group 67% 83%
NoNumber 4 1
5 28%% of age group 33% 17%
Totals 12 6 18 100
Outcomes Based Evaluation Steps
Continuous Process
Program Improvement
Step 5: Communicate Findings
Present data in clear and understandable format
Provide explanatory information related to your findings
Outcome Data Table:Teen Mother Parenting Education Program
Total AGE
12-14 15-16 17+ Number of babies born in reporting period
18 4 8 6
Newborns weighing above 5.5 pounds and scoring 7 or above on Apgar Scale
Number Percent
13 72%
2 50%
6 75%
5 83%
Data Presentation
Pie Chart: Bar Chart:
Trial-run Outcome Findings
Do the findings seem reasonable?
Is the information presented clearly? Are explanations of problem areas and
proposed remedies satisfactory?
Does anything seem to be missing?
What other charts or tables would be helpful?
Outcomes Based Evaluation Steps
Continuous Process
Program Improvement
Measure & Monitor Outcomesfor Continuous Improvement
Review your process and data; make any necessary adjustments to your program
Monitor and review your programs periodically
Outcomes Based Evaluation Steps
Continuous Process
Program Improvement
Myth Busters
It’s an event to get over with and then move on!Evaluation is a whole set of new activities –
“We don’t have the resources!”There’s a “right” way to do outcomes evaluation.
“What if I don’t get it right?”Funders will accept or reject my outcomes plan.I always know what my clients need – “I don’t need
outcomes evaluation to tell me if I’m really meeting the needs of my clients or not.”
Provide direction for Staff
Identify Staff and Volunteer training
Identify technical assistance needs
Identify program improvement needs
Support annual and long range planning
Guide budget and justify resource allocation
Focus Board members on programmatic issues
Use your Findings
Resulting in…… Meeting your Mission
Resources
Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach. United Way of America. To order, call 800-772-0008
Logic Model Development Guide. Clear and concise discussion of the use of logic models. W. K. Kellogg Foundation (www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf)
Information Gold Mine; Innovative uses of Evaluation. Paul W. Mattessich and Shelly Hendricks (Amherst H. Wilder Foundation 2007)
Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach. United Way of America 1996
www.managementhelp.org/evaluatn/lgc_mdl.htm The Manager’s Guide to Program Evaluation,
Paul W. Mattessich, (Fieldstone Alliance 2003)
Questions