Best Practices In Investor Presentations · 3 PRESENTATION BACKGROUND •Survey conducted to gain...
Transcript of Best Practices In Investor Presentations · 3 PRESENTATION BACKGROUND •Survey conducted to gain...
PRESENTERS
2
Yvette LokkerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
CIRI
Rebecca CorbinFounder and Managing Partner
Corbin Perception
3
PRESENTATION BACKGROUND
• Survey conducted to gain better understanding of IR and
investor alignment and disconnects
‒ “IR Survey” conducted by CIRI | n = 57, IR professionals
‒ “Investor Survey” conducted by Corbin | n = 271,
investment professionals globally (ongoing research)
• Research serves to affirm best practices and uncover high-
impact areas for further capturing investor/analyst
mindshare
• Selected examples of best-in-class slides on leading topics
of interest to the investment community provided
6
Which of the following components do you include in your presentation?
IR SURVEY FINDINGS
Top 5
Bottom 5
7
*not financial guidance
For what timeframe do you provide
quantitative targets?*
IR SURVEY FINDINGS
What quantitative targets do you
provide?
10
IR SURVEY FINDINGS
80% feel the deck is
understandable
as a stand-
alone
document
without the
benefit of
commentary
6% incorporate
videos into
the deck
89% develop the
deck internally
with the
remainder
collaborating
with external
consultants
Not for distribution 12
The Investor Deck Is One Of The Most Important Sources Of Information
LEADING SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Investors rank deck
as important as
meeting with
management
91% indicate it is
THE leading driver to
the IR website
Not for distribution 13
Communicate The What, The How, The Why & Most Importantly….The “So What”
MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENTS IN THE INVESTOR DECK
Not for distribution 14
Educate To Elevate Your Investment Story
EX-FUNDAMENTALS, MOST IMPORTANT INVESTMENT DRIVERS
Not for distribution 21
Operational Excellence/Leading Innovation Growing Focus For Investors
MOST IMPORTANT SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
Not for distribution 22
VERY CLEAR ABOUT HOW THEY ARE DIFFERENTIATED
Specific
about
what they
do not do
Not for distribution 27
A Best-in-Class Trait That Is Generally Not Well Articulated By Companies
An analysis of companies thateffectively position operational
excellence reveals:
• Business system is defined
and tangible objectives
provided
• Positioned as a sustainable
competitive differentiator
and core competency; it often
defines the culture
• Financial impact is tied to
business system
SUSTAINABLE ADVANTAGE: OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
PROOF POINTS
Improved working capital
turns
FCF generation, conversion
Margin outperformance
Ability to pass on cost
Top-line, organic growth
Superior M&A integration
Market share gains
Customer experience
Leadership/employee
engagement
Shareholder value delivery,
leading TSR
Not for distribution 33
Must Link Innovation To Financial Impact
SUSTAINABLE ADVANTAGES: LEADING INNOVATION
Not for distribution 37
CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT: BEST IN CLASS ANALYSIS1
The Benefit of Transparency
• Investors appreciate details
• Increases management
credibility by enhancing
information flow with metrics
largely under management’s
control
• Demonstrates execution
track record
• Proactively addresses issues
that would otherwise create
an opening for “financial
investors” or activists
Disclosure In Action
• 72% | “Disciplined” acquisitions
• 68% | “Opportunistic” share repurchase
• 56% | “High ROI” capital expenditures
• 56% | Dividend growth
• 28% | Internal R&D
• 28% | Investment grade balance sheet
1Based on internal research on 50 of companies and selection of 25 that detailed capital allocation
Not for distribution 41
M&A: BEST IN CLASS ANALYSIS1
• Deployment of best
practices
• Cost synergies
• Sales synergies
• Leverage distribution
channel
• Leverage supply base
50% address benefits
Communicated Rationale
• 68% | Strategic fit: “Within the realm
of what we do”
• 55% | Technologies, products and
services
• 36% | Adjacent Markets
• 18% | “Good” industries
• 18% | Hold leading market share
• 14% | Where scale would add value
• 9% | Geographic expansion
1Based on internal research on 50 of companies and selection of 22 detailed M&A expectations
Not for distribution 42
M&A: BEST IN CLASS ANALYSIS1
1Based on internal research on 50 of companies and selection of 22 detailed M&A expectations
Communicated Metrics
• 41% |Accretive in Year One on:
‒ EPS
‒ EBITDA
‒ ROIC
• 18% | IRR > WACC
• 18% |Double-digit ROI
• 9% |At corporate OM or better
• Number of acquisitions over a
period(s)
• Amount allocated toward
acquisitions over a period(s)
and tied to sales growth
41% highlight track record
Not for distribution 49
Encourages Investors To Focus On Where You Are Going
LONG-TERM METRICS MOST IMPORTANT TO INVESTORS
58% prefer
3-year targets
Not for distribution 53
FINAL THOUGHTS: INVESTOR DECK BEST PRACTICES
Ensure one-click
access on IR
website
Some Pictures Are
Worth 1,000 Words
BUT Content Is
King
Content should be
robust enough so that
investor can follow
without the benefit of
speaker’s commentary
Send a proactive email
when important
updates are made;
point out whether they
are material or not
53% of investors report
update email prompts review
(almost immediately) – send
updates!