B e p u b l t t of tfje ^ In ltp p tn i'S

departm ent of CbucattonRegion VI -Western Visayas

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOILO CITY

July 30, 2021

DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. S '! S. 202(1

SUBMISSION OF RESEARCH PROPOSALS FOR SY 2021-2022 (REGIONAL LEVEL CATEGORY)

To: Chief Education Supervisors (CID/SGOD)Education Program Supervisors (CID/SGOD)Public School District Supervisors Elementary/Seconc|ary School Principals/Heads/OICs Unit Heads All Others Concerned

1. Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017 entitled “Research Management G uidelines” this Office, through the School Division Research Committee (SDRC) is accepting Basic and Action research proposals for SY 2021-2022 until A u g u st 23, 2021.

2. The research proposal should follow the attached prescribed template and research topic/area sh o u ld be anchored on the research agenda stipulated in the following issuances:

a. Regional Memoradum No. 141, s. 2020“Regional Research Priority Topics in the New Normal”

b. DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2016“Adoption of the Basic Education Research Agenda”

3. The attached Division Memorandum No. 6, s. 2021 entitled “Guidelines of the Submission of Research Proposals and Completed Research Reports” should be followed in the submission of the research proposals. This memorandum and its inclosures can be downloaded from these links: 1) http://deDediloilocity.net and 2) http://tinyurl.com/ ResearchFiles2020.

4. In addition, the School Research Committee (SRC) are advised to properly review the completeness and accuracy of data of the required documents. The District Research Committee (DRC) will evaluate the research proposal based on the attached Guide for Appraising Basic/Applied and Action Research Proposals. Proposals with scores 70% will be submitted to the Division Office together with the accomplished District and School Evaluation Results Summary Form (Inclosure No. U).

5. Research proposal and the title should vary from the researches already conducted based on the List of Approved BERF Researches 2016 - 2020 which can be viewed and downloaded from the links stated above.

6. The data gathering procedures and the implementation of intervention/innovation/ strategy should strictly adhere to the public health standard and policies set by the Department of Health, the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Disease (AITF-MEID), LGU and DepEd.

7. Research proposal and the required documents will be submitted to the School Governance and Operations Division (SGOD), do Planning and Research Section, in hard copies (4 sets) and soft copies to be sent to this email address divplanninci. sdoiloilocitv& gm ail.com following the sequence as listed below:

Hard Copy Soft Copy12 Research Proposal Evaluation and

Review Sheet(Signed by the District and School Research Committees)

1 1 st File (for manuscript)Filename format: (pdf & doc file)

Last name. First name. School. ManuscriDt (e g. Cruz, Juan, Iloilo Central ES, Manuscript)

Contents:a. Research Proposalb. Certification of Validity and Reliability of

the researcher made instrument/tool (scanned copy)

c. Research Intrument/Tool

3 Application Form (new)(Must be properly accomplished with Research Agenda & Topic and signed by the proponent/s and Immediate Supervisor)

4 Declaration of Anti-Plagiarism Form(Signed by the proponent/s)

5 Declaration of Absence of Conflict of Interest Form(signed by the proponent/s)

2 2nd File (for Attachment)Filename format: (pdf & doc file)

Last name. First name. School, Attachments (e.g. Cruz, Juan, Iloilo Central ES, Attachments)

Contents (scanned copy):a. Application Formb. Declaration of Anti-Plagiarism Formc. Declaration of Absence of Conflict of

Interest Formd. Data Privacy Consent Forme.

6 Research Proposal(followed the prescribed format with separate title page)

7 Data Privacy Consent Form(signed by the proponent/s)

8 Certification of Validity and Reliability of the researcher made instrument/tool (Signed by validators)

9 Research Instrument/Tool 3 3rd Filea. Research Proposal Evaluation and Review

Sheetb. District and School Evaluation Results

Summary Form

8. The Schools Division Research Committee (SDRC) will evaluate the research proposals based on the Guide for Appraising Basic/Applied and Action Research Proposals. Proposals with scores 70% and above will be submitted to the DepEd Regional Office for evaluation by the Regional Research Committee (RRC) and possible funding under the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF).

9. All DepEd issuances stipulated in this memorandum, the required documents and other references relative to researches can be downloaded from the following links:

a) http://deped. in/ResearchFiles2020b) https://tinyuri. com/ResearchFiles2020c) http://DDrddeDedreciion6.info/research/

References: DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017Regional Memorandum No. 142, s. 2020 Division Memorandum No. 6, s. 2021

Allotment: 1-2-3-4-5 (D ivision M em orandum No. 157, s. 2019)To be indicated in the Perpetual Index

Under the following subjects:

RESEARCH BASIC EDUCATION SCHOOLS

SGOD/JMG/eig

Address: Gen. Luna - Mabini Sts., Iloilo City W ebsite: http://depediloilocity.net Em ail: infodepaJiloilocity@gmail.com Tel. Nos.: (OSDS) 336 9273 / 3336 4745 (SGOD) 336 2751

___________ (C IP) 335 0140 (AO) 321 3277_________________

Republic of tlic i)l]ilippiurs

department of CbucattonRegion VI —Western Visavas

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOILO CITY

February 5, 2021

DIVISION MEMORANDUM No. fo s. 2021

G U ID E LIN ES ON TH E SUBM ISSION OF R E S E A R C H P R O P O S A LS AND C O M P LETED R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S

To: Chief Education Supervisors - CID/SGODEducation Program Supervisors- CID/SGOD Public School District Supervisors Elementary/Secondary School Principals/Heads/OICs Heads of Units/Services District Research Committees (DRC)School Research Committees (SRC)BERF Qualifiers/Researchers All Others Concerned

1. In order to facilitate the submission of researches in the Schools Division Office for evaluation and approval, the research proposals and completed researches should be coursed through the School Research Committee (SRC) and the District Research Committee (DRC) for screening, evaluation, editing and review.

2. The research topic/area should anchor with Basic Education Research Agenda (DepEd Order 39, s. 2016) and the Regional Research Priority Topics in the New Normal (Regional Memorandum No. 141, s 2020) and that will be reflected in the Application Form.

3. The research proposal should follow the prescribed outlines/templates (Inclosure No. 1) and the evaluation should be based on the Guide for Appraising the Action and Basic Research Proposals (Inclosures Nos. 5 & 6)

4. Along with the research proposal, the following reviewed required documents are to be included in the submission to the Division Office:

a) Application Form with Endorsement of Immediate Supervisor (Inclosure No. 2);b) Declaration of Anti-Plagiarism Form (inclosure No 3),c) Declaration of Absence of Conflict of interest Form (Inclosure No 4);d) Certification of Validity and Reliability of the researcher made instrument/tool;e) Research Instrument/lool;f) Data Privacy Consent Form (Inclosure No. 11); andg) Research Proposal Evaluation and Review Sheet signed by

The School and District Research Committees (Inclosure No. 9)

5. Moreover, the completed research report (manuscript) should follow the prescribed completed research report template (inclosures Nos 7 & 8) It should be edited and reviewed by the School and District Research Committees and the signed Completed Research Review Sheet (Inclosure No. 10) is attached before submission to the Division Office.

6. The composition of the School and District Research Committees are as follows:

School Research Committee (SRC) Chairperson : Principal School Research

Coordinator:Members : (at least 4 members)

7. Furthermore, the Research Proposal Research Review Sheet shall be signed t District/School Research Coordinators and an

District Research Committee (PRC) Chairperson : Public School District

SupervisorDistrict Research

Coordinator :Members : (at least 4 members)

Evaluation and Review Sheet and Completed / Public School District Supervisor, Principal, f one (1) of the members of SRC and DRC.

8. The proponent/researcher shall refrain from signing the Research Proposal Evaluation and Review Sheet and Completed Research Review Sheet if he/she is a member, research coordinator or chairperson of the School and District Research Committees.

9. DepEd issuances, the required documents and other references relative to researches can be downloaded from the following links.

a) http://deped.in/ResearchFiles2020b) h tips ://tinyur1. com/ResearchFiles2020c) http:pprddepedregion6.info/research/

10. Immediate dissemination and compliance of this Memorandum is desired.

Enclosures: As Stated, References: As Stated

MA<-Schools Division/

E Y E S , C E S O Vuperintendent|u

Allotment 1 -2-3-4-5 (Division Memorandum No 157, s 2019) To be indicated in the Perpetual Index

Under the following subjects:

RESEARCH EVALUATION BASIC EDUCATION SCHOOLS

SGOD/JMG/eig

Address : Gen. Luna - Mabini Sts., Iloilo City Website : http://depediloilocity.net Email : infodepediloilocity@gmail.com Tel. Nos. : (O SD S) 336 9273 / 3336 4745 (SG O D ) 500 1176

(C1D) 335 0140 (A O ) 321 3277

Inclosure No. _1_to Division Memorandum No. 51 s. 2021

A. ACTIO N R E S E A R C H P R O P O S A L TEM P LA TE

I. Context and RationaleII. Action Research QuestionsIII. Proposed Innovation, Intervention and StrategyIV. Action Research Methods

a. Participants and/or other Sourcesof Data and Information

b. Data Gathering Methodsc. Ethical Issuesd. Data Analysis Plan

V. Action Research Work Plan and Timeline (please refer to Inclosure No. 2 of this Memorandum)

VI. Cost Estimates(only eligible expenses as stipulated in the DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017)

VII. Plans for Dissemination and AdvocacyVIII. ReferencesIX. Appendices

a) Certification of Validity and Reliability of the researcher made Instrument

b) Research Instrument/Tool

B. B A S IC /A P P LIE P R E S E A R C H P R O P O S A L T EM P LA TE

I. Introduction and RationaleII. Literature ReviewIII. Research QuestionsIV. Score and LimitationV. Research Methodology

e. Sampling (from at least 2 schools)(Participants and/or other sources of Data and Information)

f. Data Collection Methodsg. Ethical Issuesh. Data Analysis Plan

VI. Timetable/Gantt Chart (Workplan and Timeline)(please refer to Inclosure No. 3 of this Memorandum)

VII. Cost Estimates(only eligible expenses as stipulated in the DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017

VIII. Plans for Dissemination and AdvocacyIX. ReferencesX. Appendices

a) Certification of Validity and Reliability of the researcher made instrument

b) Research Instrument/Tool

Enclosure No. 2 to Division Memorandum No. £7 s, 2021

ACTION RESEARCH WORKPLAN AND TIMELINE

Research Procedures/ Activities

PersonsInvolved

Time Frame/ Duration

InclusiveDates

SuccessIndicator

a) Pre-Intervention Stage

b) Intervention/lmplementation Stage- includes the implementation of innovation/intervention or strategy that will start

in December 2021 and the statement below:- ‘‘the submission of liquidation report which is 30 days after the release of fund’’

c) Post-Intervention Stage(ends in April to May 2022)

Date :

Proponent 1(Signature over Printed Name)

Proponent 2(Signature over Printed Name)

Proponent 3(Signature over Printed Name)

Enclosure No. 3 to Division Memorandum No. S> y s, 2021

BASIC RESEARCH TIM ETABLE

Research Procedures/ Activities

PersonsInvolved

TimeFrame/

DurationInclusive

DatesSuccessIndicator

a) Pre-Implementation Stage

b) Implementation Stage- include pilot testing and the conduct of data gathering procedures/activities that

will start in December 2021 and the statement below:“the submission of liquidation report which is 30 days after the release of fund’’

c) Post-Implementation Stage(ends within October 2022)

Date :

Proponent 1(Signature over Printed Name)

Proponent 2(Signature over Printed Name)

Proponent 3(Signature over Printed Name)

Page 1

Enclosure No. 4 to Division Memorandum No. CJ s, 2021

3Republit of the ^Ijilippinesdepartment of Ctmcatton

Region VI -Western Visayas SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOILO CITYDISTRICT :________________________

SCHOOL: __________________________

DISTRICT AND SCHOOL EVALUATION RESULTS SUMMARY FORM

(This Form w ill be submitted to Division Office -please fill-up completely)

TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE SCHOOL RESEARCH COMMITTEE RATINGS BY THE DISTRICT RESEARCH COMMITTEE (indicate names)

TOTALScore

AVERAGE

REMARKS(should indicate

findings o f the

CONTENT o f proposal

during evaluation)

INFORMATION Research Agenda Funding Format(to be sl

attachment Submittedbm itted to the Division Office1

No.Name of

Proponent/sTitle of

Research

Type o f Research (Action

or Basic/ Applied)

Level(National

orRegional)

ThemeResearchAgenda/

Topic

A m ountRequest

ed

Is the proposal

com pliant w ith

Regional Format?

Applica­tionForm

Declara­tion of

Anti Plagia­

rism Form

Absenceo f

Conflicto f

InterestDeclara­

tionForm

Data Privac y Con­sent Form

ResearchInstru­m en t/Tool

Certificate o f Valid ity

andReliability

o f the Research

Instrum ent /Tool

Date: Date :

SCHOOL RESEARCH COMMITTEE DISTRICT RESEARCH COMMITTEE

Member School Research Coordinator School Principal Member District Research Coordinator District Supervisor

Inclosure No. _5_to Division Memorandum No. g~7 . s. 2021

Guide fo r Appraising A c tio n Research Proposals

Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions Score

1

notdescribed (no points)

The action research proposal presents a general description of the problem or issue as its

focus of inquiry.(8 points)

A

The educational relevance and timeliness of the problem or issue are shown. The need to conduct action reseorch as a

way to address or improve the situation is explained.

(12 points)

The nature, extent and salience of the identified problem or issue are

comprehensively discussed. Different aspects of the action

research setting are elaborated showing in depth and critical

analysis of the situation.(15 points)

i

'

notpresented (no points)

The action research proposal mentions an intervention,

innovation or strategy to be tried out to address the

problem or issue.(8 points)

The proposal outlines when and where the intervention,

innovation or strategy will be undertaken, and who will be

involved. Activities to be undertaken are stated.

(12 points)

The rationale, extent and limitation of the intervention, innovation or

strategy are explained in detail. Its plausibility as a way to address the problem or issue is given support.

(15 points)

K .V -: . - . - • i a ; , v

w $ ■ ■

. . . _

' Question^' '

30 points

r ; • ■ ' . ■ : **;'*• - • • ••• . " •••;;• • ;•

not stated (no points)

The action research proposal has a stated aim, objective, or general research question(s).

(15 points)

The research question(s) specifies the action research

variable(s) or the focus of inquiry. Key elements of the

research question(s) are reflected in the title of the

proposal.(25 points)

The research question(s) logically proceeds from the context of the

inquiry. It clearly relates to the identified problem or issue, and conveys the desired change or

improvement.(30 points)

" 1

j

i

i

i

i ...............

not stated (no points)

notdescribed (no points)

not stated (no points)

lowIncreasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions

^ high

M M f '

The action research proposal states the target participants and/or other sources of data and

information (ex; learners, teachers, documents, realia, learners' products, others)

(5 points)

Details are provided about the target participants (ex: number, characteristics, sampling procedure,

if any) and/or other sources of data and information. Clear rationale for their inclusion in

the study is given.(10 points)

The action research proposal presents a general description

of the method(s) to be employed for gathering data.

(5 points)

Details of the data gathering method(s) are provided. the

specific kinds of data, how and when they will be collected (ex:

pretest and posttest scores). Research instruments, if any, are described (ex: test, scale, survey

questionnaire, checklist, interview guide, others).

(8 points)

The proposal explains why the selected data gathering method(s) is suited to the nature and purpose

of the action research. The data gathering method(s) is aligned with the research questions). Research

instruments, if any, are appropriate for obtaining the desired kind of

data / information.(10 points)

!

The action research proposal presents a general description

o f how the gathered data / information will be analyzed.

(5 points)

Details of the method(s) of data analysis are given. Techniques

(ex: quantitative/statistical, qualitative, or both methods), as well as tools (ex: software) to be

employed are specified.(8 points)

The selected method of data analysis is shown to be appropriate

to the nature of the data/ information to be gathered and for

addressing the research question(s).(10 points)

•>

MainIncreasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions

Score

Action

•:' S T - '^

<v , ; .

not included (no points)

The action research proposal includes a list of major activities and their timelines.

(3 points)

A detailed work plan is provided covering start to completion of the action research.

Timelines are realistic and show concretely how the action research will

unfold over the allowed period. The overall plan reflects the proponent's

capacity to concretize ideas into clear and sequential steps to be undertaken.

(5 points)

not included The action research proposal includes a A detailed breakdown of items with their(no points) list of major items and their estimated corresponding costs is furnished. The

s’'’ costs. The total cost is shown. items and costs reasonably reflect the.C o s t? ; ; (3 points) funding needs of the action research, and

Estimatestsumaies adhere to the BERF guidelines. The overallplan reflects the proponent's capacity to

5 P0,ntS project specific expenses that she or he beaccountable for.

:''. •!-•• ‘K ' - V.SicSS: ■,

(5 points)

Total Score

Iriclosure No. 6 to Division Memorandum No. , s. 2021

A N N EX 4 .a: GUIDE FOR APPRAISING BASIC RESEARCH PROPOSALS

MainCriteria

Increasing Levels o f Quality and their Descriptions Score

Rationale of the

Research

10 points

no rdescribed

(no points)

The research proposal presents a general description o f the topic or

focus of inquiry.(5 points)

The educational relevance and timeliness of the research topic are

shown. It explains the need to conduct research to understand a phenomenon, advance or validate knowledge, improve a situation, or

oddress on issue / problem.(8 points)

The nature, extent and salience of the research topic are comprehensively discussed. Different aspects of the

reseorch setting ore elaborated showing in depth ond critical analysis of the situation. Policy implications, benefits and limitations of the study

ore stoted.(10 points)

ResearchQuestions

20 points

not stated (no points)

The research proposal has a stated aim, objective, or general research

questions.(10 points)

The research questions specify the variables or the focus of inquiry. Key elements of the research questions

ore reflected in the title of the proposal.

( IS points)

The reseorch questions logically proceed from the context of the

study. They are formulated to clearly show the extent ond different angles of inquiry (ex: different variables of interest, relationships to be probed, geogrophtcol and temporol scope).

(20 points)

Use of Related

Literature and Proper

Citation

10 points

notprovided

(no points)

The research proposal cites theories and/or previous studies related to the present research. Sources are

properly acknowledged.(5 points)

Viewpoints and issues underlying the present research ore discussed ond synthesized. They are critically evaluated to

identify inconsistencies or gaps in current knowledge or educational policy that the study intends to address. Constructs ore defined and presented in a conceptual

framework. Citation of literature sources is consistent (10 points)

^ 2 p f m u4 *

MainCriteria

Sut>-Criteria Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions Score

ResearchMethods

40 points

Participants and/or other

Sources of Oata and

Information (10)

oof stated (no points)

The research proposal states the study's target Details are provided about the torQet participants participants ond/or other sources o f data and (ex number, characteristics, sampling procedure,

information (ex: divisions, districts, offices, if any) and/or other sources of data and schools, learners, teachers, parents, documents, information. Cieor rotionale fo r their inclusion m

secondary data, others) the study is given.(S points) ! (10 points)

l

OataGatheringMethod(s)

andResearch

Instruments(20)

notdescribed

(no points)

The research proposal presents o general description of the

methods to be employed for gathering doto.

(10 points)

Details of data gathering methods are provided: the

specific kinds of data, how and when they will be collected it

describes any research instruments (ex: test, scale,

survey questionnaire, checklist, interview guide) to be developed

or adopted.(15 points)

The proposal explains why the data gathering methods are

suited to the nature and purpose o f the study. The data gathering

methods ore aligned with the research questions. Details

about research instruments are presented such os their sources or how they will be developed

and by whom, and their appropriateness for obtaining

the desired kind of data / information.(20 points)

DataAnalysis

Plan(10)

not stated (no points)

The research proposal presents a general description o f how the

gathered data / information will be analyzed.

(5 points)

Details o f the methods of data analysis are given. Techniques

(ex. quantitative/statisticol, qualitative, or both methods), os well as tools (ex: software) fo be

employed are specified.(8 points)

The selected me rhods of data onolysis are shown to be

appropriate to the noture of the data / information to be

gathered and fo r addressing the research questions.

(10 points)

MainCriteria

increasing levels of Quality and their Descriptions Score

Wort Plan and

Timelinesi

10 posnts

nof included

(no points)

The research proposal includes o lis t o f

m ojor activities and their timelines

(S points)

A deta iled work plon is p rovided covering

s ta rt to com pletion o f the research.

Timelines are realistic and show

concretely how the research w ill unfo ld

over the allow ed period. The overall p lan

reflects the proponent's capacity to

concretize ideas in to dear and sequential

steps to be undertaken.

(10 points)

CostEstimates

10 points

not included

(no points)

The research proposal includes a lis t o f

m ojo r items and their estim oted costs. The

to ta l cost is shown.

(5 points)

A deta iled breakdown o f items w ith the ir

corresponding costs is furnished, the

items and costs reasonably reflect the

fund ing needs o f the research, and adhere

to BCRF guidelines. The overall p lon

reflects the proponent's cooooty to

project specific expenses tha t she or he

w ill be accountable for.

(10 points)

Total Score