Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

73
Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University

Transcript of Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Page 1: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Beef Grading

J. Brad MorganOklahoma State University

Page 2: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Inspection Wholesomeness USDA

Food Safety Inspection Service

Veterinarian Mandatory Taxpayer funded

Grading Value – Quality and

Yield USDA

Agricultural Marketing Service

Grader Voluntary Packer pays per hour

Page 3: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Grading

The process of dividing a commodity into groups which differ in the marketing process

Grades: Must be based on factors that are

important to buyers and sellers Should reflect the final use of the product Should be practical and conform, as

closely as possible, to existing trade practices

Page 4: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Beef Grading

Segregating of cattle and beef carcasses based on expected value

1923 use of tentative standards 1926 USDA promulgated official

standards

Page 5: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Gender Determination

Bull Steer Bullock Heifer Cow

Page 6: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Gender Examples

Page 7: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Dressing Percentage

HCW/LW * 100 Steers & Heifers = 61 – 66% Cows = 48% (very variable) Affected by:

Fill Finish (fat) Muscling Mud, Horns, Etc.

Page 8: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Yield Grading USDA YG 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 To predict CUTABILITY Percent boneless, closely

trimmed retail cuts from the round, loin, rib, and chuck

1 = highest cutability (more muscle; less fat)

5 = lowest cutability (less muscle; more fat)

Page 9: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Yield Grading Factors

Fat Thickness = Preliminary Yield Grade (PYG)

Hot Carcass Weight (HCW) Ribeye Area (REA) Kidney, Pelvic & Heart Fat % (KPH)

Page 10: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Ribbing Between the 12th

& 13th Rib Bloom Time =

approx. 15 min for oxygenation of the ribeye

Page 11: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Fat Thickness (PYG)

¾ Distance opposite the ribeye

Can measure as fat thickness or PYG

Must convert if use fat thickness

Also, make adjustments based on fat of entire carcass

Page 12: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Fat Thickness to PYG 0.0” fat = 2.0 PYG For every 0.1” increase in fat

increase PYG 0.25 0.1” = 2.25 PYG 0.2” = 2.5 PYG 0.3” = 2.75 PYG 0.4” = 3.0 PYG 0.6” = 3.5 PYG 0.8” = 4.0 PYG 1.2” = 5.0 PYG

Page 13: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

PYG 2.0

Page 14: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

PYG 2.5

Page 15: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

PYG 3.0

Page 16: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

PYG 3.5

Page 17: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

PYG 4.0

Page 18: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

PYG 4.5

Page 19: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

PYG 5.0

Page 20: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Hot Carcass Weight & Ribeye Relationship

600 lbs carcass requires an 11.0 sq. in. ribeye

Each 100 lbs increase in carcass weight requires an additional 1.2 sq. in. REA 700 lbs carcass requires 12.2 800 lbs carcass requires 13.4 500 lbs carcass only requires 9.8

Page 21: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

HCW/REA ScheduleHCW REA HCW REA500500 09.809.8 700700 12.212.2525525 10.110.1 725725 12.512.5550550 10.410.4 750750 12.812.8575575 10.710.7 775775 13.113.1600600 11.011.0 800800 13.413.4625625 11.311.3 825825 13.713.7650650 11.611.6 850850 14.014.0675675 11.911.9 875875 14.314.3

Page 22: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

HCW/REA adjustment If larger than needed, subtract from

PYG If smaller than needed, add to PYG For every 0.3 difference from needed

size add or subtract 0.1 to PYG Examples:

600 lbs/11.0; measures 12.2; -0.4 to PYG 800 lbs/13.4; measures 12.5; +0.3 to PYG 750 lbs/12.8; measures 16.8; -1.3 to PYG

Page 23: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

REA Measurement

Page 24: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Kidney, Pelvic & Heart Fat Percentage

Based on percentage of HCW 3.5% = 0.0 adjustment For every 0.5% deviation from 3.5

+/- 0.1 adjustment to PYG If more than 3.5%, add to PYG If less than 3.5%, subtract from

PYG

Page 25: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

KPH 5.0% = +0.3 4.5% = +0.2 4.0% = +0.1 3.5% = 0.0 3.0% = -0.1 2.5% = -0.2 2.0% = -0.3 1.5% = -0.4

Page 26: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

KPH

Page 27: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

KPH examples

Page 28: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Determining USDA YG

Determine PYG Make Adjustments to PYG

HCW REA KPH

Examples!!!

Page 29: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

HCW = 700

PYG = 2.7/2.8

REA = 15.5

KPH = 2.0%

YG = 1.5

Page 30: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

HCW = 784

PYG = 3.0/3.2

REA = 14.4

KPH = 2.5%

YG = 2.6

Page 31: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

HCW = 636

PYG = 3.1/3.4

REA = 10.8

KPH = 3.0%

YG = 3.5

Page 32: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

HCW = 801

PYG = 4.3/4.5

REA = 13.1

KPH = 3.0%

YG = 4.5

Page 33: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

HCW = 738

PYG = 4.8/5.2

REA = 12.0

KPH = 4.0%

YG = 5.5

Page 34: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

USDA Yield Grade

USDA YG %BCTRC

1

2

3

4

5

52.3 % or more

52.3 - 50.0%

50.0 - 47.7%

47.7 - 45.4%

45.4% or less

Page 35: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Instrument Grading

Page 36: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Ribeye picture

Page 37: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Quality Grading Estimates palatability

Tenderness, Juiciness & Flavor Based:

Maturity (Physiological) Marbling Score

Page 38: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

USDA Quality Grades

“Young” – cattle < 42 mos. Prime Choice Select Standard

“Old” (Hardbone) – cattle > 42 mos. Commercial Utility Cutter Canner

Page 39: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

USDA Quality Grade Factors

Maturity – A, B, C, D, E Lean Maturity

Lean Color Lean Texture

Skeletal Maturity Bone Ossification Shape & Color of Ribs

Marbling Amount & Distribution of Intramuscular

Fat

Page 40: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Lean Maturity

Page 41: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Thoracic Buttons

Page 42: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Ossification of Thoracic Buttons

Maturity Thoracic Sacral Lumbar Ribs

A0 0% Distinct Separation

None Red & Round

B0 10% Complete Nearly Complete

Slightly Wide & Flat

C0 35-75% Complete Complete

D0 75-95% Complete Complete Moderately Wide & Flat

E0 95-100% Complete Complete Wide & Flat (White)

Page 43: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

A Maturity Thoracic Buttons

Page 44: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

B Maturity Thoracic Buttons

Page 45: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

C Maturity Thoracic Buttons

Page 46: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

D Maturity Thoracic Buttons

Page 47: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

E Maturity Thoracic Buttons

Page 48: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Marbling Scores Abundant Moderately Abundant

(Mab) Slightly Abundant (Slab) Moderate (Md) Modest (Mt) Small (Sm) Slight (Sl) Traces (Tr) Practically Devoid (Pd) Devoid (D)

Page 49: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Marbling

Slight Modest

Moderate Moderately AbundantSlightly Abundant

Small

Page 50: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Quality Grading Chart

Page 51: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Determining the Quality Grade

Determine Lean & Skeletal Maturity

Balance Maturities Determine Marbling Score Determine Final Quality Grade

Page 52: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

A Maturity Ab = Pr+ Mab = Prº Slab = Pr- Md = Ch+ Mt = Chº Sm = Ch-

Sl50 & up = Se+ Sl49 & down = Se- Tr = St+ Pd = St-

Page 53: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

B Maturity

Must have enough marbling to make up for degree of maturity B30 maturity would need Slab30 to be

Pr- B30 & Slab20 = Ch+

If B maturity overall & Small or Slight marbling then USDA Standard!!!!!

Page 54: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

C, D, E Maturity

Must have enough marbling to make up for degree of maturity

Can only be Commercial, Utility, Cutter or Canner

Remember C0 needs Sm0 to be Cm-

Page 55: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

C, D & E ChartQuality Grade C D E

Cm+ Md Slab Mab

Cmº Mt Md Slab

Cm- Sm Mt Md

Ut+ Sl Sm Mt

Utº Tr Sl Sm

Ut- Pd Tr Sl

Page 56: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Prime+ (Ab)

Page 57: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Primeº (Mab)

Page 58: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Prime- (Slab)

Page 59: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Choice+ (Md)

Page 60: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Choiceº (Mt)

Page 61: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Choice- (Sm)

Page 62: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Select+ (Sl+)

Page 63: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Select- (Sl-)

Page 64: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Standard+ (Tr)

Page 65: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Standard- (Pd)

Page 66: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Some Carcass Defects

Page 67: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

In the Cooler of a Beef Plant Ribbing Bloom USDA applies grade

Yield Grade, Prime, Choice, Select Marked if “Old”

In-house grader (tagger) sorts; identifies regrades

Sorts based on weight, yield grade, quality grade, dark cutter, program “NO ROLL”

Page 68: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

USDA Certified Programs

Plants have many programs Specified with G CAB is G1

After plant personnel specify “G” program, USDA must accept

Page 69: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Branded Meat ProgramsCurrent 43

Page 70: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

“Cow” Grades

Packers who slaughter “cull cows” NEVER use official USDA grades

Use their own terminology Premium White Cow Breaker Boning Utility (Ute) Cutter/Canner (C and C)

Page 71: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

“Cow” Grades

Cow grades of the current USDA system provide little usefulness to the “cull cow” industry

Do not accurately reflect the market

Each packer has its “own” system – makes market reporting virtually impossible

Page 72: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

USDA Live and Carcass Grades

LiveGrade

Dress%

Fat Thick

BCS CarcassGrade

Breaker 51-55 >.3 -1.2 7-9 Commercial

Boner 50-51 .2 -.3 5.5 - 6 Utility

Lean 48 -49 .02-.19 3 – 5.5 CannerCutter

Lite <48 Same 1 – 4 Cannercutter

Page 73: Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.

Questions?