Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm - SSE...
-
Upload
truongdung -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
3
Transcript of Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm - SSE...
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Page 3 of 58
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
[Page intentionally left blank]
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 4 of 58
Table of Contents
Abbreviations and Definitions............................................................................................ 6
1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 9
1.1 Background .................................................................................................. 9
1.2 Consent Conditions ..................................................................................... 9
1.3 Structure of this DP .................................................................................... 10
2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 11
3 Background Information ....................................................................................... 15
3.1 The Development ....................................................................................... 15
3.2 Physical Environment ................................................................................ 17
3.3 Biological Environment ............................................................................. 19
3.4 Human Environment .................................................................................. 20
3.5 Nature Conservation Designations ........................................................... 22
4 Description of Items to be Decommissioned ....................................................... 26
4.1 Layout of the Development ....................................................................... 26
4.2 Development Elements to be Decommissioned ...................................... 28
5 Description of Proposed Decommissioning Measures....................................... 34
5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 34
5.2 Decommissioning Options ........................................................................ 34
5.3 Guiding Principles ...................................................................................... 35
5.4 Proposed Decommissioning Process ...................................................... 37
5.5 Waste Management and Residual Value of Recovered Materials ........... 43
5.6 Lighting and Marking ................................................................................. 44
6 Environmental Impact Assessment...................................................................... 45
7 Consultation with Interested Parties .................................................................... 46
8 Costs ...................................................................................................................... 47
9 Financial Security .................................................................................................. 48
10 Schedule ................................................................................................................ 49
11 Project Management and Verification .................................................................. 50
12 Seabed Clearance .................................................................................................. 51
13 Restoration of the Site .......................................................................................... 52
14 Post-decommissioning Monitoring, Maintenance and Management of the Site 53
15 Supporting Studies ................................................................................................ 54
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 5 of 58
16 References ............................................................................................................. 55
Appendix A - Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm ES and SEIS .............................................. 57
Appendix B (confidential) - Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Financial Security
Information ........................................................................................................................ 58
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 6 of 58
Abbreviations and Definitions
Term Description
AC Alternating Current.
BATNEEC Best Available Technology Not entailing Excessive Economical Costs.
BOWL Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Limited (Company Number SC350248) and
having its registered office at Inveralmond House, 200 Dunkeld Road,
Perth, PH1 3AQ.
BMAPA British Marine Aggregate Producers Association.
BPEO Best Practicable Environmental Option.
CCC Climate Change Capital Ltd.
CD Chart Datum.
CDM Construction (Design and Management).
S36 Consent The written consent granted by the Scottish Ministers under Section 36
of the Electricity Act 1989, on 19 March 2014.
Consent
Conditions
The terms that are imposed on BOWL under the S36 or Marine Licence
Consent that must be fulfilled throughout the period that the Consent is
valid.
CoS Chamber of Shipping.
DECC Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Development The Wind Farm and the OfTW.
DP The decommissioning programme; to be submitted by the Company to
the Secretary of State under section 105(2) of the Energy Act 2004 (as
amended).
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment.
EC Birds
Directive
Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds
EC Habitats
Directive
Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural
habitats and of wild fauna and flora
ES The Environmental Statement submitted to the Scottish Ministers by the
Company on 23 April 2012 as part of the Application as defined above.
GRE Glass-fibre Reinforced Epoxy.
HMR Helicopter Main Route.
HSE Health, Safety and Environment.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 7 of 58
Term Description
IMO International Maritime Organisation.
JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Marine Licences The written consents granted by the Scottish Ministers under Section
20(1) of the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010, dated 2 September 2014.
MCA Maritime and Coastguard Agency.
MoD Ministry of Defence.
MS-LOT Marine Scotland Licensing Operations Team.
MW Megawatt.
NERL NATS (En Route) plc.
NLB Northern Lighthouse Board.
NM Nautical Mile.
NtM Notices to Mariners.
O&M Operation and Maintenance.
OfTW The Offshore Transmission Works. The OfTW includes the transmission
cable required to connect the Wind Farm to the Onshore Transmission
Works. This covers the OTMs and the cable route from the OTMs to
the landfall west of Portgordon on the Moray coast.
OfTW corridor The area within which the OfTW cable is to be located as presented in
the ES and SEIS.
OfTW cable The cable connecting the OTMs to the landfall site.
OnTW The onshore transmission works from landfall, consisting of onshore
buried export cables to the onshore substation and connection to the
National Grid network.
OSPAR
(Convention)
The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the
North-East Atlantic.
OTM Offshore Transformer Module means an alternating current (AC)
offshore substation platform which is a standalone modular unit that
utilises the same substructure and foundation design as a wind turbine
generator.
PEXA Practice and Exercise Areas.
PMF Priority Marine Feature.
ppt Parts per thousand.
PSR Primary Surveillance Radar.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 8 of 58
Term Description
RAF Royal Air Force.
RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.
RYA Royal Yachting Association.
SAC Special Area of Conservation, protected sites classified in accordance
with the EC Habitats Directive.
SEIS Supplementary Environmental Information Statement submitted to the
Scottish Ministers by the Company on 29 May 2013 as part of the
Application as defined above.
SEPA Scottish Environment Protection Agency.
SFF Scottish Fishermen’s Federation.
SFPA Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency.
SHE-T Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Limited.
SNH Scottish Natural Heritage.
SoS Secretary of State.
SPA Special Protection Area, protected sites classified in accordance with
the EC Birds Directive.
TCE The Crown Estate.
The Wind Farm The offshore array development as assessed in the ES including wind
turbines, their foundations, inter-array cabling and meteorological
masts.
UKHO United Kingdom Hydrographic Office.
UNCLOS United Nations Convention of Law on the Sea.
WDC Whale and Dolphin Conservation.
WMP Waste Management Plan.
WTG Wind Turbine Generator.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 9 of 58
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
1.1.1 The Development received consent under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 from
the Scottish Ministers on 19 March 2014 (the S36 Consent) and was issued two Marine
Licences from the Scottish Ministers, for the Wind Farm and associated Offshore
Transmission Works (OfTW), on 2 September 2014 (the Marine Licences). The
Development is scheduled to commence construction in 2017.
1.1.2 The purpose of this Decommissioning Programme (DP) is to satisfy the requirement
for a programme for decommissioning to be submitted to the Secretary of State (SoS)
for the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) for approval, in consultation
with the Scottish Ministers, prior to the start of construction.
1.1.3 Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Limited (BOWL) is the partnership formed between SSE
Renewables (50%), Repsol Nuevas Energias UK (25%) and Copenhagen
Infrastructure Partners (25%).
1.2 Consent Conditions
1.2.1 On 15 October 2014 a notice was issued to BOWL on behalf of the SoS for DECC in
exercise of his powers under Section 105(2) of the Energy Act 2004 requiring, prior to
the commencement of construction, the submission of a programme for
decommissioning the relevant objects specified in Schedule 1 of the notice, namely:
Renewable energy installation, including foundations, pipelines, any electric
lines and cables (including those between the installation and the Mean Low
Water Mark), installed specifically for use with or connected to use with the
Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm electricity generating station.
1.2.2 This DP has been produced in accordance with the Section 105(2) notice.
1.2.3 Submission of this DP for approval by the SoS for DECC will also satisfy the
requirements of Condition 3 of the S36 Consent and Condition 3.2.2.2 of the OfTW
Marine Licence, as set out in Table 1.1 below.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 10 of 58
Table 1.1 – Relevant S36 Consent and OfTW Marine Licence consent conditions
Consent Document
Condition Reference
Condition Text
Section 36 Consent
Condition 3
“Where the Secretary of State has, following consultation with the Scottish Ministers, given notice requiring the Company to submit to the Secretary of State a Decommissioning Programme, pursuant to section 105(2) and (5) of the Energy Act 2004, then construction may not begin on the site of the Development until after the Company has submitted to the Secretary of State a Decommissioning Programme in compliance with that notice.
Reason: To ensure that a decommissioning plan is submitted to the Secretary of State where the Secretary of State has, following consultation with the Scottish Ministers, so required before any construction commences.”
OfTW Marine Licence
Condition 3.2.2.2
“Where the Secretary of State has, following consultation with the Licensing Authority, given notice requiring the Licensee to submit to the Secretary of State a DP, pursuant to section 105(2) and (5) of the Energy Act 2004, then construction may not begin on the Site of the Works until after the Licensee has submitted to the Secretary of State a DP in compliance with that notice.”
1.3 Structure of this DP
1.3.1 This document is divided into the sections summarised in Table 1.2 and follows the
structure set out in the DECC guidance (DECC, 2011).
Table 1.2 – Summary of DP contents
Section Summary of Content
1 Introduction Background to the Development including the companies that are party to the programme and their ownership status, and consent requirements relevant to this DP.
2 Executive summary A summary highlighting the essential features of the proposed DP.
3 Background information Relevant background information including the layout of the Development and confirmation of items to be decommissioned; and, a summary of environmental conditions across the site.
4 Description of items to be decommissioned
A full description of all items associated with the generating station to be decommissioned.
5 Description of proposed decommissioning measures
An overview of the proposed approach to decommissioning the Development, including: an overview of the process; details of items to be left in situ; and, waste management.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 11 of 58
Section Summary of Content
6 Environmental Impact Assessment
Details of the EIA that was prepared for the Development and its consideration of decommissioning activities.
7 Consultations with interested parties
The consultation process undertaken to support development and finalisation of the DP.
8 Costs An overall cost estimate of the proposed decommissioning measures.
9 Financial security Details of the financial security which the companies that are party to the programme propose to provide.
10 Schedule Details of the proposed decommissioning time-scale.
11 Project management and verification
Information on how BOWL will manage the implementation of the DP.
12 Sea-bed clearance Information relating to BOWL's proposals confirming that, following decommissioning, the site has been cleared, including information on site surveys and schedules.
13 Restoration of the site Description of how BOWL intends to restore the site as far as reasonably practicable, to the condition that it was in prior to construction of the installation.
14 Post-decommissioning monitoring, maintenance and management of the site
Details of the post decommissioning monitoring/activities that will be required, given that BOWL is not proposing to fully remove all infrastructure.
15 Supporting studies Details of supporting studies that have been used to inform the DP.
2 Executive Summary
2.1.1 The Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm is a joint venture project between SSE Renewables,
Repsol Nuevas Energias UK and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners. Together they
form the partnership Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Limited (BOWL).
2.1.2 The Development received consent under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 from
the Scottish Ministers on 19 March 2014 (the S36 Consent) and was issued two Marine
Licences from the Scottish Ministers, for the Wind Farm and associated Offshore
Transmission Works (OfTW), on 2 September 2014 (the Marine Licences). The
Development is scheduled to commence construction in 2017.
2.1.3 The project is seeking to develop the Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm, located in the
Outer Moray Firth on the north-western point of the Smith Bank, approximately 13.5
km from the Caithness coastline. The Development is comprised of 84 wind turbine
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 12 of 58
generators (WTGs), with a rated generating capacity of 7 Megawatts (MW) each, and
will therefore generate a maximum capacity of 588 MW. Two alternating current (AC)
Offshore Transformer Modules (OTMs) (offshore substation platforms) will collect the
generated electricity and convert the electricity from 33kV to 220kV for transmission to
shore by two subsea export cables, totalling approximately 130 km in length. Inter-
array cables will connect the wind turbines in strings, the strings of wind turbines to the
OTMs, and inter-connect the OTMs.
2.1.4 Following consent a notice was issued by the Secretary of State (SoS) on 15 October
2014, following consultation with the Scottish Ministers, giving notice requiring BOWL
to submit to the SoS a Decommissioning Programme (DP), pursuant to section 105(2)
and (5) of the Energy Act 2004, prior to construction of the Development being allowed
to commence.
2.1.5 The proposed measures set out in this draft DP adhere to the existing UK and
international legislation and guidance notes and have regard to decommissioning best
practice. Methods outlined are presented based on currently available technology. It is
expected that by the time of decommissioning, significant technological changes may
result in different approaches to decommissioning activities and such changes will be
reflected in future revisions of the draft DP.
2.1.6 The DP details the methods associated with the future end of life decommissioning of
the Development. It has been prepared on the basis of known site characteristics and
consent conditions. The DP is informed and supported by the Environmental
Statement (ES) and Supplementary Environmental Information Statement (SEIS)
prepared for the Development. These documents were submitted as part of the
applications for consent in April 2012 (ES) and May 2013 (SEIS). The ES and SEIS
provide detailed analysis of the baseline physical, biological and human environment,
and present an assessment of the likely significant effects of the Development on the
receiving environment, taking into account decommissioning provisions that are
consistent with those presented in this document. Electronic copies of the ES and
SEIS can be accessed online, via the link given in Appendix A to this document.
2.1.7 In advance of decommissioning, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will be
reviewed to assess the potential impacts that may arise and are not covered in the
initial EIA process and subsequent reviews. At this point, a decision will be made by
BOWL, in consultation with the statutory authorities, as to whether a more detailed
assessment of the likely significant effects of decommissioning is required.
2.1.8 A summary of the proposals for decommissioning the offshore components of the
Development are outlined below:
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 13 of 58
Development Component Proposed Decommissioning Measure
Wind Turbines Complete removal from site.
Wind Turbine Support Structures
Entire jacket structure removed; pin pile foundations cut off at or below the seabed and cut sections removed from site.
OTMs (topsides) Complete removal from site.
OTM Support Structures Entire jacket structure removed; pin pile foundations cut off at or below the seabed and cut sections removed from site.
Cables (marine export) Cut off and left in situ buried in the seabed.
Cables (inter-array) Cut off and left in situ buried in the seabed.
2.1.9 In considering appropriate decommissioning provisions BOWL has sought to adhere
to the following key principles as set out in DECC guidance (DECC, 2011) on
decommissioning offshore renewable energy installations under the Energy Act 2004,
namely:
Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO), which is the option with the
most benefit or least damage to the environment as a whole at an acceptable
cost. This involves balancing the reduction in environmental risk with
practicality and cost of reducing the risk;
Consideration of the rights and needs of legitimate users of the sea;
Safety of surface and subsurface navigation; and
Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) considerations.
2.1.10 This document also provides a strategy for dealing with the decommissioned
components. This will include recovered steel, copper and glass fibre composites. The
proposed strategy will be to re-use and recycle as much material as possible.
2.1.11 The Development has an anticipated operational period of 25 years following final
commissioning, and in the absence of re-powering, decommissioning would be
required at the end of the operational period. The final schedule of decommissioning
works will be determined once the DP has been reviewed by BOWL two years prior to
the end of the operational period (approximately year 23 of operation). The timing of
the review ensures that the project is sufficiently close to the commencement of
decommissioning for the information, methods and legislation to be up to date at the
point of decommissioning. It also allows sufficient time for any necessary assessments
to be undertaken or consents to be obtained.
2.1.12 BOWL’s approach to consultation on this DP follows the guidance set out in the DECC
guidance (DECC, 2011) and is in accordance with the requirements of the Energy Act
2004.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 14 of 58
2.1.13 A cost estimate for the DP has been derived based on the equipment and personnel
requirements and the duration of the works. Financial security has been carefully
considered to ensure that the liability will be met and an approach to this has been set
out for DECC approval.
2.1.14 This DP is considered sufficient to meet the requirements set out under Section 105 of
the Energy Act 2004; the submission of this DP for formal approval by DECC is also
considered sufficient to satisfy the S36 Consent Condition 3 and Condition 3.2.2.2 of
the OfTW Marine Licence.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 15 of 58
3 Background Information
3.1 The Development
3.1.1 The Development comprises the Wind Farm and the OfTW.
3.1.2 The site is located in the Outer Moray Firth on the north-western point of the Smith
Bank, approximately 13.5 km from the Caithness coastline. The Wind Farm site is
approximately 19 km in length and 9 km in width at the maximum extents, covering an
area of approximately 131.5 km2.
3.1.3 The export cable route corridor within which the two export cables will be installed is
approximately 65 km in length and varies between 575 m and 1054 m in width running
between the Wind Farm site and Mean High Water Spring (MHWS) at the landfall point.
It leaves the south of the Wind Farm site and follows the northern boundary of the
Moray Firth Round 3 Zone, passing through the Western Development Area of the
Moray Firth Round 3 Zone towards the landfall at Portgordon on the Moray coastline.
3.1.4 Figure 3.1 shows the site location, boundaries and cable route to shore.
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Page 16 of 58
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Fig
ure
3.1
– W
ind
Fa
rm lo
cati
on
, b
ou
nd
ari
es a
nd
OfT
W c
ab
le r
ou
te
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Page 17 of 58
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
3.1.5 The Development comprises 84 wind turbines, each with a rated generating capacity
of 7 Megawatts (MW), and will therefore generate a maximum capacity of 588 MW.
3.1.6 The substructure for the wind turbines will comprise a jacket made up of a tubular steel
lattice structure with 4 legs. Each substructure will be fixed to the sea bed using four
pin piled foundations.
3.1.7 Two alternating current (AC) substation platforms, referred to as offshore transformer
modules (OTMs), a form of offshore substation platform, will collect the generated
electricity and convert the electricity from 33kV to 220kV for transmission to shore via
two subsea export cables, totalling approximately 130 km in length. The support
structures for the OTMs will be identical to those used for the wind turbines.
3.1.8 A network of circa 170 to 190 km 33 kV inter-array buried, subsea cables will connect
strings of wind turbines together and will connect the wind turbines to the OTMs; an
interconnector cable will connect the two OTMs.
3.1.9 No meteorological monitoring masts (met masts) will be installed, although metocean
buoys may be deployed within the site.
3.2 Physical Environment
3.2.1 A range of surveys have been completed by BOWL to establish the physical
characteristics of the Development site. These studies informed the EIA for the
Development, are reported as part of the ES and SEIS, and form the basis for this
section of the DP. The following sections provide sufficient information to inform
consideration of the decommissioning provisions.
Metocean Characteristics
3.2.2 The Wind Farm site has the following metocean characteristics, as summarised in
Table 3.1 below.
Table 3.1 - Metocean Characteristics of the Wind Farm site
Estimated Average Mean Wind Speed Approximately 10 metres per second (m/s) at 110 m above LAT
Water Depth Range 35 – 68 m Chart Datum (CD)
Mean Surface Temperature 11°C (summer)
6°C (winter)
Surface Salinity Range 34.5-35 parts per thousand (ppt)
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 18 of 58
Topography and Bathymetry
3.2.3 The Wind Farm site is located on the Smith Bank, a submerged bathymetric high in
the Outer Moray Firth. Water depths across the Wind Farm site range between 35 and
55 metres below chart datum.
3.2.4 From the Wind Farm, the middle section of the OfTW cable route also passes through
central parts of the Outer Moray Firth with water depths varying from 50 m below Chart
Datum (CD) at the edge of Smith Bank to 100 m CD in a deepwater channel that runs
parallel to the southern Moray Firth coastline. Water depths then shoal gradually to the
shoreline and cable landfall in Spey Bay.
Geological Characteristics
3.2.5 The main body of Smith Bank is relict and stable, comprising bedrock overlain by
poorly sorted stiff clay till sediments, with a variably thick veneer of (occasionally shelly)
marine sands and gravels. Sidescan sonar data indicate a predominance of granular
surface sediments across the Development site, except in the shallowest parts near
the crest of Smith Bank, where the underlying till is largely exposed with little sediment
veneer.
3.2.6 Seabed sediments in the Outer Moray Firth area are broadly characterised as sandy
or gravelly sandy material. The grain size of the sand fractions is generally finer than
on Smith Bank.
Tidal Processes
3.2.7 Smith Bank is exposed to semi-diurnal tidal forcing. The mean neap tidal range is 1.4
m, the mean spring tidal range is 2.8 m, and the maximum (astronomical) tidal range
is 4 m. The tidal current axis is aligned approximately north by north east (ebb) by
south by south west (flood). Peak tidal current speeds over Smith Bank are generally
0.25 ms-1 during mean neap tides and 0.50 ms-1 during mean spring tides. Spatial
gradients in tidal current speed result in a weak residual transport directed south west
or south, into the Moray Firth.
3.2.8 Non-tidal surges are known to occur in the Moray Firth, caused by the influence of
strong winds and atmospheric pressure gradients associated with storms over the
North Sea. Non-tidal surges can cause instantaneous water levels to be up to 1 m
above or below the predicted value. Tidal surges also induce a surge current, which
will be directed into the Moray Firth. The magnitude of this current will vary depending
upon the scale and timing of the surge, but an extreme event may modify normal tidal
currents by the order of 1 ms-1. In this area the magnitude of surge currents is
predicted to decrease rapidly with distance into the Moray Firth and so the north
eastern end of the Wind Farm site will experience the greatest effects.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 19 of 58
Wave Regime
3.2.9 Smith Bank is exposed to wave action on a regular basis. Winds blowing from
directions from south by southeast, clockwise through to north, are only able to act
upon the water surface over a relatively limited distance within the confines of the
Moray Firth. Hence waves from these directions are typically more limited in height
and period. Winds and hence waves (but of a limited height) most frequently occur
from the south west.
3.2.10 Much larger waves are observed to come from other directions that have much longer
fetches into the North Sea. Over such long distances, distant storms can also drive
long period swell waves into the Moray Firth that do not necessarily rely on further local
wind input.
3.3 Biological Environment
Benthic Environment
3.3.1 The seabed at the Wind Farm site is dominated by sands and gravels. The most
extensive benthic community occurs in medium sands with low gravel content. A range
of biotopes exists across the Development Site, the SS.SCS.ICS.MoeVen1 (hereafter
referred to as MoeVen) biotope, a Scottish Priority Marine Feature (PMF) was located
within the Wind Farm site. As identified within the ES, this was a new record of this
biotope in deeper waters2 (i.e., waters of up to 50 m).
Fish and Shellfish Ecology
3.3.2 The principal shellfish species caught within the area in which the Wind Farm site is
located are king scallop, Nephrops, edible crab and squid. Haddock, herring, monkfish
and whiting account for the majority of the fish landings. Spawning and nursery
grounds have been defined for a number of species, including cod, herring, lemon sole,
Nephrops, plaice, sandeel, sprat and whiting, within and in the vicinity of the
Development. Elasmobranch and diadromous fish species potentially use areas within
or in the vicinity of the Development.
Marine Mammals
3.3.3 A range of marine mammal species are present within the Moray Firth, with harbour
porpoise, harbour seal, and grey seal being the most numerous and widespread
recorded across the Wind Farm site during baseline surveys for the EIA. Minke whale
were also recorded regularly within the Wind Farm site but in much lower abundance
and only during the summer months. Distribution maps for bottlenose dolphin, a year-
round resident, showed that individuals mainly occurred within the inner reaches of the
Moray Firth and along the south coast, including near the Portgordon landfall location
1 Moerella spp. with venerid bivalves in infralittoral gravelly sand. 2 The MoeVen biotope is more typically found in waters depths of less than 20 m.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 20 of 58
in Spey Bay. The most abundant species found within this southern area were
bottlenose dolphin, harbour porpoise, and minke whale.
Ornithology
3.3.4 The seabird breeding colonies around the Moray Firth are host to internationally
important populations of several species. Thirteen species of seabird and four species
of wildfowl were identified from survey data as potential sensitive receptors, namely:
Fulmar, Sooty shearwater, Shag, Gannet, Arctic skua, Great skua, Kittiwake, Great
black backed gull, Herring gull, Arctic tern, Guillemot, Razorbill, Puffin, Pink footed
goose, Greylag goose, Barnacle goose and Whooper Swan.
3.4 Human Environment
Marine Archaeology
3.4.1 The Wind Farm site itself is known to have been largely restricted in the past to glacial
and marine conditions; therefore never becoming terrestrialised within the last 12,000
years. Relative sea level change in the area, combined with glacial isostatic uplift, has
meant that the Outer Moray Firth has remained either under ice sheets or submerged
by the North Sea since the last glacial period. This means that there have been no
opportunities for terrestrial deposits of palaeo-environmental interest, such as peats,
to develop.
3.4.2 There are no recorded wrecks or features identified within the Wind Farm site, but
several recorded wreck locations were identified within the export cable corridor and
the Outer Study Area (1 km buffer from the transmission corridor boundary), with a
number of potential targets of cultural heritage interest identified from the geophysical
data.
Offshore Wind Farms
3.4.3 The Moray Firth Round 3 Zone is located adjacent to the east of the Wind Farm site.
To the southwest, at a distance of approximately 11 km, lie the two existing Beatrice
demonstrator turbines. The Beatrice complex is linked to the mainland via a 132/33
kV seabed power cable making landfall at Dunbeath.
Oil and Gas Exploration and Related Activities
3.4.4 There are two producing oil fields, named ‘Beatrice’ and ‘Jacky’, located to the
southwest of the Wind Farm Site. The key structures within these areas include the
Beatrice Alpha, Bravo and Charlie platforms and the Jacky platform. Oil is exported via
a 66 km long 16 inch (0.4 m) pipeline from the Beatrice Alpha complex to a shore
terminal at Nigg in the Cromarty Firth.
Subsea Cables
3.4.5 The SHEFA-2 fibre-optic telecommunications cable runs from the Faroe Islands to
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 21 of 58
Banff in Moray. It runs north to south, to the east of the Wind Farm site.
3.4.6 The route of the transmission cable proposed by Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission
Limited (SHE-T) for a Caithness-Moray link will pass to the east of the Wind Farm
site. This SHE-T cable makes landfall directly to the east of the BOWL cable having
run parallel with BOWL for approximately 5km prior to reaching the shore.
Ports and Harbours
3.4.7 There are a number of ports and harbours located within the Moray Firth and
surrounding area. These include the important fishing ports of Wick off the north east
coast and Buckie Harbour on the south coast and the sheltered deepwater commercial
ports and harbours of Inverness and the Cromarty Firth located at the head of the
Moray Firth.
3.4.8 There are also a number of smaller, former fishing harbours, that have been
redeveloped as small marinas and these include Banff, Whitehills, Lossiemouth and
Findhorn on the south coast of the Moray Firth and Helmsdale on the north coast. The
area has direct links with the Caledonian Canal (Inverness).
Shipping Activities
3.4.9 Shipping in the vicinity of the Development includes commercial shipping, fishing and
recreational yachting.
3.4.10 The Wind Farm site is located in an area of low commercial ship density, with the
nearest main ship route passing 5 nautical miles (NM) north by northeast of the Wind
Farm site boundary - the route used by ships heading to and from the Pentland Firth.
3.4.11 The export cable route is also located in area of low commercial ship density with the
nearest main shipping route crossing the cable route approximately 3.5 NM north of
the Moray coast (associated with Inverness and Cromarty Firth). Vessels are known
to anchor in the Moray Firth during adverse sea and weather conditions.
Commercial Fishing
3.4.12 Scallop dredging is recorded throughout the Moray Firth, including on the Smith Bank
and in inshore areas along the Caithness and Moray coasts but there is limited activity
recorded within the Wind Farm site. There is additionally whitefish and squid fishing
activity in the vicinity of the Wind Farm site, although the majority of activity by vessels
targeting these fisheries occurs outwith the Wind Farm site.
3.4.13 The export cable route transects fisheries for Nephrops in the southern Moray Firth,
scallop grounds in both the offshore and inshore areas, seasonal squid grounds and
creel grounds for lobster and crab in the inshore section of the cable route.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 22 of 58
Aviation
3.4.14 The Wind Farm is visible to the primary surveillance radar (PSR) at RAF Lossiemouth
and the NATS (En Route) plc (NERL) PSR at Allanshill. The Wind Farm is located in
the vicinity of and directly beneath helicopter main route (HMR) X-RAY which routes
between Aberdeen and Wick, and the helicopter approaches to helidecks on platforms
in the Beatrice and Jacky oil fields.
Military Interests
3.4.15 Military Practice and Exercise Area (PEXA) charts, produced by the UK Hydrographic
Office, identify the military activity zones within the Moray Firth area. PEXAs are used
for various military practice activities by the Royal Navy, the Army, the Royal Air Force
(RAF) and the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Firing Practice Areas D807 and D809 are
the closest areas (1 NM east and 2.6 NM south of the Wind Farm site) and the
proposed OfTW corridor passes through Firing Practice Area D807. Tain RAF
Bombing Range is located approximately 19 NM southwest.
3.5 Nature Conservation Designations
3.5.1 The closest European designations to the Wind Farm are located at a distance of 16.5
km and 37 km respectively, and are the Caithness Cliffs Special Protection Area (SPA)
and the Moray Firth Special Area of Conservation (SAC), which are designated for the
conservation of breeding bird interests, and for sub tidal sandbanks and the bottlenose
dolphin respectively.
3.5.2 Information on European designated sites considered in the Appropriate Assessment
undertaken during the consenting of the Development is provided in Table 3.2. The
location of those sites in closest proximity to the Wind Farm are shown in Figure 3.2.
Table 3.2 – European designated sites considered in Appropriate Assessment
Site Qualifying Features
Moray Firth SAC Bottlenose dolphin
Subtidal sandbanks
Dornoch Firth and Morrich More SAC
Common (harbour) seal
Otter
Atlantic salt meadows
Coastal dune heathland*
Dune grassland*
Dunes with juniper thickets*
Estuaries
Glasswort and other annuals colonising mud and sand
Humid dune slacks
Intertidal mudflats and sandflats
Lime-deficient dune heathland with crowberry*
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 23 of 58
Site Qualifying Features
Reefs
Shifting dunes
Shifting dunes with marram
Subtidal sandbanks
(* indicates priority habitat)
Berriedale and Langwell Waters SAC
Atlantic salmon
River Evelix SAC Freshwater pearl mussel
River Moriston SAC Atlantic salmon
Freshwater pearl mussel
River Oykel SAC
Atlantic salmon
Freshwater pearl mussel
River Spey SAC
Atlantic salmon
Sea lamprey
Freshwater pearl mussel
Otter
River Thurso SAC Atlantic salmon
River Borgie SAC Atlantic salmon
Freshwater pearl mussel
Otter
River Dee SAC
Atlantic salmon
Freshwater pearl mussel
Otter
River Naver SAC
Atlantic salmon
Freshwater pearl mussel
East Caithness Cliffs SPA Cormorant (breeding)
Fulmar (breeding)
Great black-backed gull (breeding)
Guillemot (breeding)
Herring gull (breeding)
Kittiwake (breeding)
Peregrine (breeding)
Puffin (breeding)
Razorbill (breeding)
Shag (breeding)
Seabird assemblage (breeding)
North Caithness Cliffs SPA Fulmar (breeding)
Guillemot (breeding)
Kittiwake (breeding)
Peregrine (breeding)
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 24 of 58
Site Qualifying Features
Puffin (breeding)
Razorbill (breeding)
Seabird assemblage (breeding)
Hoy SPA Arctic skua (breeding)
Fulmar (breeding)
Great black-backed gull (breeding)
Great skua (breeding)
Guillemot (breeding)
Kittiwake (breeding)
Peregrine (breeding)
Puffin (breeding)
Red-throated diver (breeding)
Seabird assemblage (breeding)
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Page 25 of 58
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Fig
ure
3.2
– E
uro
pe
an
de
sig
nate
d s
ite
s in
th
e v
icin
ity o
f th
e W
ind
Fa
rm
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Page 26 of 58
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
4 Description of Items to be Decommissioned
4.1 Layout of the Development
4.1.1 Figure 4.1 shows the layout of the Development wind turbines and OTMs (the export
cable route corridor is shown in Figure 3.1 above).
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 27 of 58
Fig
ure
4.1
– B
eatr
ice W
ind
Fa
rm w
ind
tu
rbin
e a
nd
OT
M l
ayo
ut
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Page 28 of 58
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
4.2 Development Elements to be Decommissioned
4.2.1 The following elements of the Development will be decommissioned. Further details of
the decommissioning process, including the decommissioning method for each of the
major components, are set out in Section 5.
Wind Turbines
4.2.2 Horizontal axis wind turbines will be used which are made up of three main external
components as follows.
Rotor – comprised of the blades, hub, spinner and spinner bracket;
Nacelle - housing the electrical generator, the control electronics and gearbox,
adjustable speed drive or continuously variable transmission; and
Structural support - includes the tower and rotor yaw mechanism which allows the
wind turbine rotor to turn against the wind.
4.2.3 The main components to be decommissioned are summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Summary of wind turbine components to be decommissioned
Component Number Key dimensions
Wind turbine tower sections
84 towers in 3 sections Hub height:110 m above Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT)
Total tower height: 85 m (approx.)
Tower diameter (base): 6 m
Tower diameter (top): 4.145 m
Wind turbine nacelles
84 Siemens 7MW nacelles
Size: 20.6 m (l) x 9 m (h) x 9.1 m (w)
Wind turbine blades
84 x 3 rotor blades Blade length: 75 m (154 m rotor diameter)
Wind Turbine Support Structures (Foundations and Substructures)
4.2.4 The wind turbine foundations will be comprised of four steel pin piles per structure,
which will be attached by grouted connection to a jacket substructure.
4.2.5 The jacket substructures and pin piles will vary in length depending on seabed
conditions and water depth. The pin piles will have a diameter of 2.2 m and have a
length of circa 35 - 60 m.
4.2.6 The jacket substructure will be of tubular steel lattice design with four legs. Transition
pieces will be mounted on the jacket substructures during fabrication and will form the
point of connection between the wind turbine tower to the support structure.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 29 of 58
4.2.7 The main components to be decommissioned are summarised in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 - Summary of support structure components to be decommissioned
Component Number Key dimensions
Foundation piles 86 x 4 piles
(84 wind turbine foundations plus 2 OTM foundations)
Pile diameter: 2.2 m
Pile length: variable estimated 35 to 60 m
Jacket Substructure (including flanged wind turbine/jacket transition piece connection)
86 four leg jacket structures
(84 wind turbine foundations plus 2 OTM foundations)
Height: variable circa 57 to 77 m
Size at seabed (pile centre to pile centre): 24 m x 24 m
Grouted pile connection
86 x 4 jacket leg connections
-
4.2.8 An illustration of a tubular jacket substructure is provided in Figure 4.2.
Figure 4.2 – Wind turbine and OTM support structure – example of a tubular jacket
substructure
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 30 of 58
Offshore Transformer Modules and Foundations
4.2.9 Two OTMs will be installed to collect the generated electricity and convert the electricity
from 33kV to 220kV for transmission to shore by the two export cables.
4.2.10 The OTMs comprise two elements: the topside and the support structure. The main
components to be decommissioned are summarised in Table 4.3. The OTM support
structure will be as described for the wind turbines above and summarised in Table
4.2.
4.2.11 An illustration of a typical indicative OTM is provided in Figure 4.3.
Table 4.3 – Summary of OTM components to be decommissioned
Component Description Key dimensions
OTM Two OTMs comprising:
Two jacket substructures; and
Two OTM topside modules
Jacket substructures: see Table 4.2
OTM topside size: 33 m (l) x 19.2 m (w) x 9 m (h)
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 31 of 58
Figure 4.3 - Example of an OTM top-side layout installed on a jacket structure and arrangements
of topsides and cable deck
Inter-array Cables
4.2.12 The inter-array cables are the cables which connect the wind turbines to each other
and to the OTMs. The main components to be decommissioned are summarised in
Table 4.4.
4.2.13 It is BOWL’s preferred option to bury the inter-array cables. It is therefore not currently
anticipated that cable protection material will be needed. Only close fitting mechanical
protection between the seabed and J-tubes is anticipated. The exception to this would
be where the intended depth of cover (i.e. the thickness of material on top of the cable
after installation) is not achieved during installation.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 32 of 58
Table 4.4 – Summary of inter-array cabling to be decommissioned
Component Description Image Key dimensions
Inter-array cabling 3-core 33kV armoured submarine cable consisting of:
42 No. Type 1 (indicative cross-sectional area of 630mm2);
48 No. Type 2 (indicative cross-sectional area of 400mm2).
Example 3 core cable
Up to 170 - 190km in total length
Offshore Transmission Works - Export Cables
4.2.14 Two HVAC export power cables will connect to the OTMs and will run to the cable
landfall point west of Portgordon where they will connect with the onshore transmission
works. The main components to be decommissioned are summarised in Table 4.5.
Table 4.5 – Summary of inter-array cabling to be decommissioned
Component Description Image Key
dimensions
Export cables From offshore array to landfall (approx. 65 km length):
One armoured submarine 3-core 220kV cable per circuit (two circuits) consisting of aluminium conductors with a cross-sectional area of 1200mm2.
At landfall, under beach (approx. 1 km length):
One armoured submarine 3-core 220kV cable per circuit (two circuits) consisting of copper conductors with a cross-sectional area of 1600mm2.
Example 3 core cable
Up to130km in total length (for two cables combined)
Metocean Buoys
4.2.15 Up to three metocean buoys may be anchored to the seabed within the Wind Farm
area to gather data on the wave and tidal regime throughout the lifetime of the
Development.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 33 of 58
Scour Protection
4.2.16 No scour or cable protection measures are proposed for use within the Wind Farm site
to protect the Wind Farm structures or the inter-array cables (noting the possible need
for some mechanical protection where cables approach the jacket J-tubes or where
burial is not achieved).
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 34 of 58
5 Description of Proposed Decommissioning Measures
5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 This section provides an overview of the decommissioning options available and sets
out the proposed approach to the decommissioning of the Development as described
in Section 4 above.
5.2 Decommissioning Options
5.2.1 BOWL have considered alternative options for the decommissioning of the
Development; a brief summary of the options is set out below. When making a final
decision on the approach to decommissioning towards the end of the lifetime of the
Development, BOWL will take into consideration the Best Practicable Environmental
Option (BPEO), commercial viability and HSE risks.
5.2.2 The current option for the decommissioning is set out in Section 5.4. However a
number of other options may be considered as set out immediately below.
Decommissioning and construction of a new wind farm
5.2.3 For this scenario the assumption has been made that wind energy is still economically
attractive in 2044 and the technical integrity of the Wind Farm is declining. If this were
the case, installing new and better technology may be more profitable than increasing
the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) effort for a few extra years of running time on
the existing Wind Farm. Under such a scenario, the existing Wind Farm would be
decommissioned (following the process set out under Section 5.4 below) and a new
wind farm erected (with all appropriate consents having been obtained beforehand).
Re-powering
5.2.4 In this scenario it is assumed that wind energy is still economically attractive in 2044,
the technical integrity of the wind turbines is declining but the electrical infrastructure
and possibly the foundations remain sound. If electrical infrastructure is installed
properly its lifetime could be up to 50 years, whilst experience from the oil and gas
industry indicates that the lifetime of foundations can also be extended outside the
design specifications.
5.2.5 By closely monitoring the structural integrity of the asset, it could be possible to re-use
these parts of the system in a re-powering of the Wind Farm – that is fitting new wind
turbines to the existing foundation and electrical systems.
Step-down
5.2.6 This scenario assumes it is not profitable to invest in new technology but that most
wind turbines will continue to perform sufficiently beyond the design lifetime of 25
years. Under this scenario, the Wind Farm would be decommissioned through a
controlled step-down. In this case wind turbines would be gradually shut down as their
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 35 of 58
technical integrity declined. A decommissioning campaign would most likely be
undertaken when the complete Wind Farm was shut down, but could also be done
stepwise if this was found to be more cost effective or if the prevailing regulatory regime
required this approach.
5.3 Guiding Principles
5.3.1 Whatever the alternative chosen, the decommissioning process will be in line with the
following principles:
BPEO, which is the option with the most benefit or least damage to the
environment as a whole at an acceptable cost. This involves balancing
the reduction in environmental risk with practicality and cost of reducing
the risk;
Consideration of the rights and needs of legitimate users of the sea;
Safety of surface and subsurface navigation; and
HSE considerations.
5.3.2 In accordance with DECC Guidance the choice of BPEO should be informed by an
EIA. The EIA used to inform this DP is the one prepared in support of application for
consent, which is reported in the ES and SEIS dated 2012 and 2013 respectively. The
information relating to decommissioning in the ES and SEIS will be reviewed if the final
decommissioning methods and programme are substantially different from those
detailed within this DP. If necessary, more detailed assessment will be undertaken to
accompany the application(s) for Marine Licence(s) which will be required for
decommissioning of the Development.
5.3.3 In considering the proposed DP for the Development, BOWL will seek solutions for
each offshore element of the Wind Farm that seek to follow the principles described in
Table 5.1.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 36 of 58
Table 5.1 - Guiding principles in considering the proposed decommissioning programme for
the Wind Farm
Guiding Principle Comments
No harm to people BOWL is committed to adhering to the highest standards for
health and safety throughout the lifecycle of the project. BOWL
seek to promote safe practices and minimise risk in the
development and implementation of decommissioning solutions.
Consider the rights
and needs of
legitimate users of
the sea
BOWL respects the rights and needs of other users of the
sea. Decommissioning activities will seek to minimise the impact
on stakeholders and emphasis will be placed on clear, open
communication.
Minimise
environmental impact
The BPEO, at the time of considering the precise
decommissioning procedure, will be chosen in order to minimise
impact on the environment at an acceptable cost.
Promote sustainable
development
In decommissioning, BOWL will seek to ensure that, as far as is
reasonably practicable, future generations do not suffer from a
diminished environment or from a compromised ability to make
use of marine resources.
Adhere to the
Polluter Pays
Principle
BOWL's decommissioning and waste management provisions
acknowledge our responsibility to incur the costs associated with
our impact on the environment.
Maximise re-use of
m aterials
BOWL is committed to maximising the re-use of waste materials
and pays full regard to the 'waste hierarchy'.
Ensure commercial
viability
In order that commercial viability is maintained, the BATNEEC
(Best Available Technique not Entailing Excessive Cost)
decommissioning solutions will be sought.
Ensure practical
integrity
Solutions that are necessary to achieve one or more of the above
objectives must be practicable.
5.3.4 Taking into account the UK’s commitments under the United Nations Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS); International Maritime Organisation (IMO) standards and the work of the
Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic
(OSPAR), BOWL’s starting assumption in establishing the decommissioning
requirements has been complete removal of all offshore components to shore for re-
use, recycling or incineration with energy recovery or disposal at a licensed site. This
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 37 of 58
assumption has been assessed for all components against the key principles
presented above. In some instances this option has not been considered to be
appropriate and alternative options have been considered. These alternatives have
also been assessed according to the above principles and the optimum solution
selected.
5.3.5 The DECC guidance (DECC, 2011) notes there are some cases where it may be
possible to consider solutions other than complete removal. This includes where
foundations or structures are located below the level of the sea bed:-
Where an installation’s foundations extend some distance below the level of
the sea-bed, removing the whole of the foundations may not be the best
decommissioning option, given the potential impact of removal on the marine
environment, as well as the financial costs and technical challenges involved. In
these cases, the best solution might be for foundations to be cut below the
natural sea-bed level at such a depth to ensure that any remains are unlikely to
become uncovered. The appropriate depth would depend upon the prevailing
sea-bed conditions and currents. Contingency plans should be included in the
decommissioning programme, to describe the action proposed if the foundations
do become exposed.
5.3.6 The following sections on the approach to decommissioning identify those parts of the
Beatrice Development where BOWL propose that the infrastructure will therefore be
left in situ and provides an assessment of the decommissioning options in relation to
the guiding principles set out in Table 5.1, specifically in relation to:
Wind turbine and OTM foundations; and
Inter-array and export cables.
5.3.7 All work will follow the recommendations and requirements of the Construction (Design
and Management) (CDM) Regulations 2015 (or applicable regulations at the time the
work starts).
5.4 Proposed Decommissioning Process
Wind Turbines Generators
5.4.1 The wind turbines will be decommissioned in full. The removal of turbine components
including blades, nacelle, and tower and will be a reversal of the installation process.
5.4.2 The general methodology for carrying out wind turbine decommissioning will be:
De-energise wind turbines and isolate from the grid;
Mobilise suitable heavy lift vessels to site;
Remove turbine blades;
Removal of all tower/nacelle internal cables that connect the generator and transformer as well as related control and communication cables;
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 38 of 58
Remove nacelle including the gearbox and generator;
Dismantle and remove turbine tower; and
Transportation of all components to an onshore facility for processing.
5.4.3 Once onshore, components are likely to be processed as follows:
All hazardous substances and fluids will be removed from the wind turbines (such as oil reservoirs and any hazardous materials and components). All such materials will then be disposed of in accordance with relevant regulations at the time of disposal;
All steel components will be sold for scrap to be recycled. This forms the bulk of the wind turbine structures; and
The wind turbine blades (fibreglass) will be disposed of in accordance with the relevant regulations in force at the time of decommissioning.
5.4.4 Table 5.2 provides an assessment of the wind turbine decommissioning process
against the guiding principles outlined in Table 5.1.
Table 5.2 - Assessment of proposed wind turbine decommissioning process against guiding
principles
Guiding Principle Comments
No harm to people Safest option, involving standard procedures and minimal work
offshore.
Consider the rights
and needs of
legitimate users of the
sea
Complete removal of wind turbines considered best long term
solution. Appropriate notification and consultation prior to
temporary works to minimise disruption.
Minimise environmental
impact
Risk of spillage minimal as a result of all potential pollutants being
fully contained within the nacelle and nacelle being removed in a
single lift. All subsequent dismantling takes place onshore
thereby minimising potential for pollution incidents.
Promote sustainable
development
Wind turbines and support structures completely removed from
site ensures no ongoing environmental impacts and no restriction
on future use of marine resources.
Adhere to the
Polluter Pays
Principle
Entirely consistent with this principle – full removal and disposal.
Maximise re-use of
m aterials
All dismantling of individual major components (i.e. nacelle) to
take place onshore. Maximum potential for re-use or recycling.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 39 of 58
Guiding Principle Comments
Ensure commercial
viability
Most commercially viable solution – minimal works offshore and
maximum potential for re-sale/re-use value from turbine
components with minimum residual risk.
Ensure practical
integrity
Known/tried and tested procedures and reduced risks due to
minimising of offshore activity.
Support Structures - Foundations and Substructures
5.4.5 The following sections set out the proposed decommissioning approach for the support
structures - piled foundation and jacket substructures.
Jackets (including transition pieces)
5.4.6 Decommissioning of a jacket structure will be the reverse of the installation process.
Following the separation of the jacket from the piles, the jacket will be lifted off the piles
by a heavy lift vessel and recovered and taken ashore for re-use or scrap recycling.
5.4.7 Table 5.3 provides an assessment of the jacket substructure decommissioning
process against the guiding principles outlined in Table 5.1.
Table 5.3 - Assessment of proposed jacket substructure decommissioning process against
guiding principles
Guiding Principle Comments
No harm to people Heavy lift and removal to shore for disassembly minimises work
offshore.
Consider the rights
and needs of
legitimate users of
the sea
Complete removal of structure considered best long term solution.
Appropriate notification and consultation prior to temporary works to
minimise disruption.
Minimise
environmental
impact
Minimal risk of environmental impact arising from jacket lifting and
removal; subsequent dismantling or cutting would take place onshore
thereby minimising potential for environmental impacts at sea.
Promote
sustainable
development
Jacket substructures completely removed from site and ensures that
no ongoing environmental impacts and no restriction on future use of
marine resources.
Adhere to the
Polluter Pays
Principle
Entirely consistent with this principle – full removal and disposal.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 40 of 58
Guiding Principle Comments
Maximise re-use of
m aterials
Any dismantling to take place onshore. Maximum potential for re-use
or recycling.
Ensure commercial
viability
Most commercially viable solution – minimal works offshore and
maximum potential for re-sale/re-use value with minimum residual risk.
Ensure practical
integrity
Known/tried and tested procedures and reduced risks due to
minimising of offshore activity.
Pin Pile Foundations
5.4.8 The proposed approach to the decommissioning of the pin pile foundations (wind
turbines and OTMs) is to cut off the piles at or below sea bed level. Currently, abrasive
diamond wire cutting is considered likely to be the preferred method for the cutting of
the piled foundations, but other methods may be preferred at the time of
decommissioning. The material cut off from the pin piles will be recovered and taken
ashore for scrap recycling.
5.4.1 Table 5.4 provides an assessment of the piled foundation decommissioning options
against the guiding principles outlined in Table 5.1.
Table 5.4 – Assessment of piled foundation decommissioning options against guiding
principles
Criterion Complete removal of piled foundations
Cutting of piled foundations at or below seabed level
No harm to
people
Significant excavation required to
remove seabed material prior to pile
recovery. Excavation would need to
be undertaken by divers and hazards
to dive teams would be significant
due to the nature of the work involved
and duration of operations.
Fewer activities to be undertaken
over a shorter time period offshore,
minimising risk to personnel. Post
decommissioning site monitoring will
identify any unlikely exposure with
the result that safety risk is
insignificant (see Section 14).
Consider the
rights and
needs of
legitimate
users of the
sea
Disadvantages to other users of the
marine environment include
disruption over a longer time period
whilst the works are undertaken and
remaining scour holes associated
with excavation.
Negligible risk presented providing
adequate consultation and
notification, cutting is to a sufficient
depth, site is monitored post
decommissioning and any unlikely
exposure identified.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 41 of 58
Criterion Complete removal of piled foundations
Cutting of piled foundations at or below seabed level
Minimise
environmental
impact
Excavation pits over a wide area
causing potentially significant impact
to marine environment. Associated
dumping of excessive volume of
excavated waste material may be
required. Disturbance would take
place over long time period.
Considerably reduced works
footprint relative to complete
removal. Works would take place
over reduced time period and
involve less equipment. Seabed
recovery time shorter than complete
removal scenario.
Promote
sustainable
development
In the long term complete removal
affords maximum flexibility over use
of seabed, though considerable
impacts are likely over the whole site
in short to medium term
Providing remaining structures do
not become exposed most future
activities will not be affected.
Seabed recovery is considered
highly likely.
Adhere to
the Polluter
Pays Principle
Consistent in principle, assuming a
suitable disposal solution can be
found for the excavated waste
material and that the seabed can be
restored.
Consistent as far as is reasonably
practicable, all remains of piled
foundations to be suitably buried.
Maximise re-
use of
m aterials
Maximum amount of piled
foundations potentially available for
re-use.
Less foundation material available
for re-use relative to complete
removal.
Ensure
commercial
viability
Not considered commercially viable -
excavation and extreme lifting
involves major equipment
requirements over longer periods of
time.
Less expensive alternative to
complete removal, involving minimal
excavation and minimising
environmental impacts.
Ensure
practical
integrity
Not a practical solution: Extreme risk
associated with heavy lift,
considerable excavation needed with
associated storage or disposal of
large volume of waste.
Standard procedures and
equipment.
Offshore Transformer Modules
5.4.2 The decommissioning of the OTMs will follow a similar method as described for the
wind turbines and turbine foundations.
5.4.3 The complete OTM topside structure will be removed in a single lift, taken by suitable
vessel to an onshore facility where the equipment and structure will be dismantled and
the constituent parts processed for re-use, recycling and/ or disposal.
5.4.4 Following the separation of the piles and the jacket, the jacket will be lifted off the piles
and recovered to land for re-use or recycling as scrap.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 42 of 58
5.4.5 Decommissioning of pin piles will involve cutting off the substructure below sea bed
level. The material cut off from the pin piles will be recovered to land for recycling as
scrap.
Inter-array and Export Cables
5.4.6 The proposed approach to the decommissioning of the buried, subsea inter-array and
export cables is to leave the cables in-situ having cut and sealed the ends of the cables
and ensured that the cut ends are securely buried below the seabed. Loose ends of
cable that remain from where the main cables are cut at the wind turbines and OTMs
will be recovered to shore for subsequent recycling.
5.4.7 Table 5.5 provides an assessment of the subsea cable decommissioning options
against the guiding principles outlined in Table 5.1.
Table 5.5 – Assessment of buried subsea cable decommissioning options against guiding
principles
Criterion Complete removal Cutting below seabed
No harm to
people
Risk to personnel not considered
excessive.
Burial within the seabed does not
pose safety risks to marine users.
Post decommissioning site monitoring
will identify any unlikely exposure with
the result that safety risk is
insignificant (see Section 14).
Consider the
rights and needs
of legitimate
users of the sea
Removal affords maximum
flexibility over use of seabed.
No risk presented from leaving buried
cables in situ. Potential for extraction
activities limited only within a limited
corridor. Site is monitored post
decommissioning and any unlikely
exposure identified.
Minimise
environmental
impact
Given the considerable length of
cable and the need for jetting
techniques, removal would
cause disruption to the seabed
and benthic habitats.
Benign - no environmental impact
associated leaving buried cables in
situ.
Promote
sustainable
development
Disturbance of the seabed in the
short-medium term, although
complete removal would allow
flexibility over use of seabed in
the longer term.
Some future activities, e.g. extraction,
may be limited but only in a limited
corridor.
Adhere to the
Polluter Pays
Principle
Consistent, assuming suitable
disposal option is found for
surplus cable components.
Benign, no pollution risk from leaving
cables in-situ.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 43 of 58
Criterion Complete removal Cutting below seabed
Maximise re-use
of m aterials
Maximum material, e.g. copper,
potentially available for re-use.
No re-use possible if left in situ.
Ensure
commercial
viability
Extensive cost of removal. Limited cost involved with re- burial of
cable 'ends'.
Ensure practical
integrity
Possible to undertake but would
result in impacts on the seabed
environment.
N/A
5.5 Waste Management and Residual Value of Recovered Materials
5.5.1 BOWL is committed to maximising the re-use of waste materials and will give full
regard to the ‘waste hierarchy’ which suggests that re-use should be considered first,
followed by recycling, incineration with energy recovery and, lastly, disposal. In any
event, waste management will be carried out in accordance with all relevant legislation
and with any necessary disposal taking place at licensed facilities.
5.5.2 The proposed approach to disposal of the main components of the Wind Farm is set
out in Table 5.6 but is subject to evolution of technology, change in regulations and
demand for materials over the lifetime of the Development.
Table 5.6 – Proposed disposal route for main Wind Farm components
Waste Material Pre-treatment Re-use/ Recycle/ Disposal
Wind turbine support
structures (jacket
substructures and pin
piled foundations)
Establish available design life
at end of 25 years.
Re-use by repowering with
new/superior wind turbines or
other renewable generation
technology or dismantle and
recycle the recovered
material as much as
possible.
Steel from wind
turbine tower and
nacelle removed to
shore
Break down into
transportable size.
Recycle.
Copper from power
cables and
transformers
Strip cable from power
cables and transformers.
Recycle.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 44 of 58
Waste Material Pre-treatment Re-use/ Recycle/ Disposal
Glass-fibre Reinforced
Epoxy (GRE) from
wind turbine blades
Break down into
transportable size.
Disposal or recycle where
facilities exist.
Used lubricants from
wind turbine
Filter. Recycle.
Non-recyclable
materials and fluids
None. Incineration with energy
recovery or disposal via
landfill.
5.5.3 The final details of the DP will be confirmed prior to decommissioning to accommodate
changes in legislation, guidance and technology. As part of this process, appropriate
waste management regulations and guidelines will be reviewed. A Waste Management
Plan (WMP) will be prepared in advance of the commencement of decommissioning
to ensure that adequate time is allowed for the necessary provisions to be made with
regards to waste management.
5.6 Lighting and Marking
5.6.1 In accordance with the requirements of the Development S36 Consent and Marine
Licences, the appropriate marks and lights shall be exhibited during the
decommissioning of the Wind Farm.
5.6.2 In relation to aviation safety, the shape, colour and character of the lighting will be
compliant with the Air Navigation Order 2009 (or then current regulation or as
otherwise directed by the Civil Aviation Authority).
5.6.3 In relation to navigational safety, lights and markings will be discussed with the
Northern Lighthouse Board (NLB), in consultation with the Maritime and Coastguard
Agency (MCA). In particular, the NLB will be consulted prior to decommissioning to
specify any obstruction marking that may be required during the removal operations.
In the event that any obstruction is left on site that may be considered to present a
hazard to navigation the necessary marking specified by NLB shall be displayed.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 45 of 58
6 Environmental Impact Assessment
6.1.1 In support of the consent applications BOWL prepared an EIA for the Development as
reported in the ES dated April 2012, with further information provided via the SEIS
dated May 2013.
6.1.2 In complying with the requirements of the EIA Directive, a lifecycle approach was taken
in assessing the impacts of the Development and in seeking to mitigate and minimise
the effect of the works. In all instances a ‘worst case’, Rochdale Envelope approach
was taken to the assessment. The assessment of the impacts included the process of
decommissioning so far as it could be predicted at the time.
6.1.3 In consultation with MS-LOT, the information relating to decommissioning in the ES
and SEIS will be reviewed when the final details of the DP are confirmed prior to
decommissioning activities taking place. Subject to the results of this consultation, and
provided that there have not been substantial changes to the baseline environment
beyond those predicted in the ES/SEIS, to the legislative process or to the methods
proposed for decommissioning, it is not currently proposed to undertake a new EIA for
decommissioning.
6.1.4 Key criteria that will inform the decision as to the need for a new or updated EIA include
consideration of:
The understanding of the baseline environment at the time just prior to decommissioning, informed by the findings of the environmental monitoring of the development and engineering/ asset surveys such as cable burial monitoring;
A review of other marine use (fishing, navigation, etc.) with potential to be affected by decommissioning;
Amenities, the activities of communities and on future uses of the environment; and
Historic environment interests.
6.1.5 If required, then the decommissioning EIA would fill any information gaps in relation to
these issues and would also describe the measures envisaged to avoid, reduce and,
if possible, remedy any likely significant adverse impacts arising from the
decommissioning process.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 46 of 58
7 Consultation with Interested Parties
7.1.1 BOWL regards effective and open communication and consultation as essential
elements to the successful development of the Beatrice project. These principles have
been adopted during the development of the project and will be applied during the life
of the Development including the decommissioning phase of the project.
7.1.2 Section 105(7) of the Energy Act 2004 provides that a notice given under Section 105
may require the recipient of the notice to carry out consultation specified in the notice
before submitting a decommissioning programme.
7.1.3 The Section 105 notice issued to BOWL by DECC sets out those bodies to be
consulted on this draft DP. These are as follows:
Marine Scotland;
British Marine Aggregate Producers Association (BMAPA);
Chamber of Shipping (CoS);
Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC);
Highland Council;
Historic Scotland;
Maritime and Coastguard Agency;
Moray Council;
Northern Lighthouse Board;
Royal Yachting Association (Scotland) (RYA);
Relevant harbour authorities (Aberdeen, Wick, Invergordon, Nigg, and
Buckie);
Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA);
Scottish Fisherman’s Federation (SFF);
Marine Scotland Compliance (responsible for the duties formerly undertaken by the Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency (SFPA)); and
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH).
7.1.4 In addition, and in line with the requirements of the Section 105 notice, BOWL will
make the DP available by publishing the draft on the Project website.
7.1.5 At the time of decommissioning, BOWL will issue timely and efficient Notices to
Mariners (NtMs) and other navigational warnings of the position and nature of the
decommissioning activities taking place. Efforts will be made to ensure that this
information reaches mariners in the shipping and fishing industry as well as
recreational mariners. The UK Hydrographic Office will be notified as appropriate on
the progress and completion of the works.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 47 of 58
8 Costs
8.1.1 All required decommissioning cost information has been provided in confidence in
Appendix B (confidential) - Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Financial Security
Information.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 48 of 58
9 Financial Security
9.1.1 All required financial security information has been provided in confidence in Appendix
B (confidential) - Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Financial Security Information.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 49 of 58
10 Schedule
10.1.1 A full decommissioning schedule will be provided closer to the point of
decommissioning setting out the detailed programme of the proposed
decommissioning works for consultation with the relevant authorities.
10.1.2 At this stage it is proposed that decommissioning would commence at year 25 after
final commissioning of the Development, coinciding with the end of the design life of
the wind turbines (but noting the options set out in Section 5.2).
10.1.3 It is proposed that the full decommissioning of Development will take approximately 12
months to complete. Offshore decommissioning and onshore dismantling of the
decommissioned infrastructure would run in parallel.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 50 of 58
11 Project Management and Verification
11.1.1 BOWL intends to undertake internal reviews of the DP throughout the lifetime of the
project. Once the Development is nearing the end of its agreed 25 year consent
period, BOWL will initiate a final review of the DP and finalise the detail of the
decommissioning provisions. This will include project management arrangements, the
schedule, costs and the verification processes to ensure decommissioning is
completed. It is anticipated that the development of the final DP will occur in
approximately Year 23 after final commissioning of the Development.
11.1.2 Following completion of the decommissioning works, it is anticipated that a
Decommissioning Report will be submitted to the appropriate regulatory authorities. In
accordance with the DECC guidance (DECC, 2011) the decommissioning report will
include:
Confirmation that decommissioning has been carried out in accordance with the approved decommissioning programme or an explanation of any major variances from the programme;
Information on the outcome of decommissioning, including confirmation of sea-bed clearance;
Confirmation that appropriate bodies have been notified of removal and of any remains;
Confirmation that appropriate aids to navigation have been installed, where required, for any remains of installations which protrude above the sea-bed and are considered to be a danger to navigation; and
Information on the actual costs of decommissioning and an explanation of any major variances from forecast costs.
11.1.3 Once the report has been submitted to DECC, BOWL will endeavour to make it
publically available.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 51 of 58
12 Seabed Clearance
12.1.1 In line with the details provided above, BOWL is committed to covering the costs
required to decommission the Development and ensuring the seabed has been
cleared. Where necessary, upon completion of the decommissioning works a survey
will be undertaken to ensure that all debris has been removed. The survey will enable
identification and recovery of any debris located on the seabed which may have arisen
from activities related to the decommissioning process and which may pose a risk to
navigation. The process of collecting and presenting evidence that the site is cleared
is required to be independent of BOWL. BOWL proposes that an independent survey
company complete the surveys and that they report in parallel to both BOWL and
DECC. The results of these surveys will be issued to DECC for review and comment
and a copy of the results will be sent to MS-LOT.
12.1.2 The required survey area would be determined during the decommissioning phase of
the project, taking into account good practice at the time and the views of stakeholders.
It is anticipated that the survey area would focus around the renewable energy
installations i.e. the jacket substructure locations, as it is assumed that inter-array and
export cables will be left in-situ. BOWL is aware of the current 500 m survey radius
around any oil and gas installation as set out in best practice guidance for post-
decommissioning surveys. However, due to the smaller footprint of the Beatrice
installations BOWL proposes a smaller radius could be used, for example, 100 m
(based on the area within which decommissioning of each structure would occur and
within which jack up vessel would operate).
12.1.3 Analysis of any survey data gathered will also ensure that items for removal and
disposal relate only to the Development. Consultation with relevant stakeholders will
be conducted in the event that other anomalies of archaeological interest are identified
during sea bed clearance.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 52 of 58
13 Restoration of the Site
13.1.1 BOWL is committed to restoring the Development area, as far as is reasonably
practicable, to the condition that it was in prior to construction of the Wind Farm.
Consistent with the decommissioning provisions detailed above, the key restoration
work will relate to:
Ensuring that foundations are cut below seabed (wind turbines and OTMs) and are made safe and adequately covered; and
Ensuring that cable ends are adequately buried, or otherwise protected.
13.1.2 Further details on how the site will be restored will be provided in the updated DP
towards the end of the project’s life.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 53 of 58
14 Post-decommissioning Monitoring, Maintenance and Management of the
Site
14.1.1 Given that BOWL are not proposing to fully remove all of the Development
infrastructure, some post-decommissioning activities may be required to identify and
mitigate any unexpected risks to navigation or other users of the sea. This could be,
for example, as a result of foundations or cables becoming exposed through natural
sediment movement. The requirement for monitoring and the extent and approach
taken will be determined based on the scale of the remaining infrastructure, the risk of
exposure and the risk to marine users.
14.1.2 Where considered necessary, post-decommissioning monitoring surveys of the
seabed will be carried out following the completion of the decommissioning works.
Surveys are expected to comprise geophysical survey (such as swath bathymetry,
sidescan sonar and magnetometer). The results of these surveys will be issued to
DECC for review and comment and a copy of the results will be sent to MS-LOT.
14.1.3 If an obstruction appears above the seabed following decommissioning which is
attributable to the Development, it will be marked so as not to present a hazard to other
sea users. The navigational marking will remain in place until such time as the
obstruction is removed or no longer considered a hazard. The monitoring of the
obstruction will be built into any monitoring and maintenance programme.
14.1.4 Details of the post-decommissioning monitoring, maintenance and management will
be discussed with stakeholders close to the point of decommissioning.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 54 of 58
15 Supporting Studies
15.1.1 A link to electronic copies of the Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm ES and SEIS is provided
in Appendix A.
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 55 of 58
16 References
Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Statement, April 2012.
Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Supplementary Environmental Information Statement,
May 2013.
Construction (Design and Management) (CDM) Regulations 2015; Available online
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/51/contents/made [Accessed 21/08/2015]
Decommissioning of Offshore Renewable Energy Installations under the Energy Act
2004: Guidance notes for Industry, DECC, January 2011 (revised); Available online
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/80786/ore
i_guide.pdf [Accessed 21/08/2015]
Guidelines and Standards for the Removal of Offshore Installations and Structures on
the Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive Economic Zone, International Maritime
Organisation (IMO), 19th October 1989; Available online
http://www.imo.org/blast/blastDataHelper.asp?data_id=22503&filename=A672(16)E.pdf
[Accessed 21/08/2015]
Marine (Scotland) Act 2010; Available online
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2010/5/contents [Accessed 21/08/2015]
Marine Scotland. Appropriate Assessment for the Beatrice Offshore Windfarm.
Available online http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0044/00446505.pdf
OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North East
Atlantic; Available online
http://www.ospar.org/html_documents/ospar/html/ospar_convention_e_updated_text_20
07.pdf [Accessed 21/08/2015]
The Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994 (as amended); Available
online http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1994/2716/contents/made [Accessed
21/08/2015]
The Energy Act 2004 (as amended); Available online
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/20/contents [Accessed 21/08/2015]
The Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2012; Available online
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/sdsi/2012/9780111018408/contents [Accessed
21/08/2015]
The Special Waste Regulations 1996 (as amended); Available online
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/972/made [Accessed 21/08/2015]
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 1982; Available online
http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
[Accessed 21/08/2015]
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 56 of 58
[Page intentionally left blank]
LF000005-PLN-146
Beatrice Decommissioning Programme
Document Reference
LF000005-PLN-146
Page 57 of 58
Appendix A - Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm ES and SEIS
The ES and SEIS can be accessed online, under the ‘More Information’ menu on the
Beatrice project website at:
www.sse.com/beatrice