Battery Failure and the 787 Dreamliner
-
Upload
ananya-agrawal -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Battery Failure and the 787 Dreamliner
-
7/29/2019 Battery Failure and the 787 Dreamliner
1/4
Battery Failure and the 787 Dreamliner
Boeing's 787 Dreamliner is an ambitious feat of engineering that eschews many
age-old conventions of airliner construction. For instance, the body of the plane
is made of a lightweight composite material instead of the traditional aluminum,
it uses technologically advanced and efficient engines, and (most controversially)uses fire-prone Li-ion battery pack in place of hydraulically controlled systems
like the brakes and the engine starter.
Is this a modern Icarus story of being too ambitious, or can the grounded 787 get
its wings back after flying too close to the sun?
-
7/29/2019 Battery Failure and the 787 Dreamliner
2/4
(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRa
SZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-
BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwH)
Previous aircraft have had other types of batteries on board, such as the 777
with nickel cadmium batteries, but this battery chemistry wasn't good enough
for what Boeing wanted to do with the 787. NiCd batteries have a low energy
density, so they end up weighing a lot, which is antithetical to the 787's
lightweight designs. What's more, after many charging cycles, NiCd batteries
suffer from the memory effect that effectively reduces the energy capacity.
Perhaps most importantly, NiCd batteries also can't deliver electricity very
quickly, so applications like starting a jet engine aren't practical. Li-ion batteries
are more energy-dense, have better power delivery, and don't suffer from the
memory effect, so they offer many tangible advantages over NiCd that enable
them to be used in new, interesting ways on the 787.
There is one downside for Li-ion batteries, however. They have been known to
occasionally burst into flames, seemingly at random. But we live in a physical
world where batteries don't just spontaneously combust without a reason; these
failures happen because something has gone awry in the battery or its design. To
understand what's happening, first we need to talk a little bit about how
batteries work. The specific type of Li-ion battery in the 787 is pretty similar to
the one in your phone or your laptop. When discharging, lithium ions travel from
the the anode to the cathode, releasing electrical energy. The anode is made of
graphite, and the cathode material for these batteries is lithium cobalt oxide(LiCoO2).
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwHhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwHhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwHhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwHhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwHhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwHhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwHhttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/5fDmsUr3vp3BdZ4RhTymPnplppgeiQSZRaSZm6beHCmracDqe73o7EHRL41ASGpOl0IanvrEPj4hm2iyZ3Xz7OxO-BQ28JaB5aARWhOVnkUX8qsJkymP8qwH -
7/29/2019 Battery Failure and the 787 Dreamliner
3/4
If the battery is overcharged, a problem can arise with the graphite anode. The
lithium atoms sometimes won't stay in the graphite but will start to crystallize as
lithium metal instead. The metal grows into a pointy crystal called a dendrite.
These long, thin crystals can grow across the battery and cause a short, releasing
a bunch of energy all at once. This energy is released as heat in the cell, and theincrease in heat can cause cause other unwanted reactions to start happening.
These reactions also release heat, reinforcing the earlier reactions, causing a
phenomenon known as "thermal runaway" in the battery. This is the point where
the flight attendant checks the lavatory for any rebellious smokers, but alas, it's
no cigarette, the battery is on fire. The Wall Street Journal has reported that this
type of dendrite formation is being heavily investigated by the NTSB as the cause
of the fires, although the Bureau cautions in comments to Reuters that "we are
still considering several potential causes for the short circuiting" in addition to
the dendritic formation.
So thermal runaway and flaming batteries are obviously undesirable. What can
be done to prevent this type of failure? The trouble really lies with the dendrite.
If Boeing and its battery supplier could prevent the dendrite from forming, there
would be no electrical short, no thermal runaway, no fire, and no problem. One
way to prevent the dendritic destruction is to make lithium really "want" to be in
the anode instead of forming a lithium metal. There are other anode materials
that bind lithium atoms more strongly, which will prevent the formation of
metal.
Another potential problem is the LiCoO2 cathode. Ji-Guang Zhang, a researcher
at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, tells the Seattle Times that a saferalternative for the cathode is lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4). LiFePO4 has a
few advantages over it's cobalt-containing counterpart. LiCoO2 is not
particularly cheap and cobalt is potentially carcinogenic. In contrast, LiFePO4
could be cheaper (if these types of batteries are built to the same scale as current
Li-ion batteries) and are less likely to give you cancer if you are exposed to its
innards. And importantly for this discussion, LiFePO4 is more chemically stable
than LiCoO2 and is less likely to cause nasty reactions. But there's one major
downside: capacity.
LiFePO4 is higher in energy than LiCoO2, and because the energy gleaned from a
battery is related to the energy difference of lithium in the anode and the
cathode, LiFePO4 batteries are less energy dense. Currently, one of the LiCoO2-
containing batteries weighs about 60 pounds, and to store the same amount of
energy, a LiFePO4-containing battery would have to weigh even more.
Considering the maximum takeoff weight of the 787 is north of 500,000 lbs, a
heavier battery wouldn't be a deal breaker. However, it will also take up more
space, it might be tricky to make room for it. Also, because of the reduced
voltage, the power is also reduced.
Another possibility is that the battery was just designed poorly (Tesla's ElonMusk certainly thinks so). Part of the problem is that the 787's battery puts the
-
7/29/2019 Battery Failure and the 787 Dreamliner
4/4
individual cells in close contact, making it difficult to dissipate heat and more
likely that failure in one cell would be difficult to isolate. The close proximity
could cause all of the cells to fail instead of just one.
The root cause of the battery failures could be due to any of these individual
problems or some combination of them, and the investigation to get to thebottom of the matter could take years. But Boeing is determined to return its
planes to the air and has been hard at work on a fix. Bloomberg reports that
Boeing has submitted a proposal for a redesigned battery to the FAA that
includes several modifications. The new battery is said to have a glass case to
contain fires, increased spacing between battery cells to prevent multiple cells
failing, and adding a ventilation system that would prevent a buildup of fumes
within the battery. These new batteries are being designed so that they can
easily be swapped with the old ones. Notably, Airbus is heading in the opposite
direction, scrapping plans for the Li-ion batteries in its next-gen A350 and
instead opting for NiCd ones.
Boeing had hoped that they could get the 787 off the ground by March, but
United Airlines seems to be slightly more pessimistic, scrubbing the aircraft from
its flight schedule until June. Until then, expect to fly the old-fashioned way -
NiCd batteries, hydraulics, aluminum, and all.