Basics of capital budgeting.ppt

26
11 - 1 Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Should we build this plant? CHAPTER 11 The Basics of Capital Budgeting

description

capital budgeting

Transcript of Basics of capital budgeting.ppt

11 - 1

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Should we build thisplant?

CHAPTER 11The Basics of Capital Budgeting

11 - 2

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

What is capital budgeting?

Analysis of potential additions to fixed assets.

Long-term decisions; involve large expenditures.

Very important to firm’s future.

11 - 3

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Steps

1. Estimate CFs (inflows & outflows).

2. Assess riskiness of CFs.

3. Determine k = WACC.

4. Find NPV and/or IRR.

5. Accept if NPV > 0 and/or IRR > WACC.

11 - 4

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive

projects?

Projects are:

independent, if the cash flows of one are unaffected by the acceptance of the other.

mutually exclusive, if the cash flows of one can be adversely impacted by the acceptance of the other.

11 - 5

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

An Example of Mutually Exclusive Projects

BRIDGE vs. BOAT to get products across a river.

11 - 6

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Normal Cash Flow Project:

Cost (negative CF) followed by aseries of positive cash inflows. One change of signs.

Two or more changes of signs.Most common: Cost (negativeCF), then string of positive CFs,then cost to close project.Nuclear power plant, strip mine.

Normal Cash Flow Project

Nonnormal Cash Flow Project

11 - 7

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Inflow (+) or Outflow (-) in Year

0 1 2 3 4 5 N NN

- + + + + + N

- + + + + - NN

- - - + + + N

+ + + - - - N

- + + - + - NN

11 - 8

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

.

k1CF

NPV tt

n

0t

NPV: Sum of the PVs of inflows and outflows.

11 - 9

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

What is Project L’s NPV?

10 8060

0 1 2 310%

Project L:

-100.00

9.09

49.59

60.1118.79 = NPVL

11 - 10

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Calculator Solution

Enter in CFLO for L:

-100

10

60

80

10

CF0

CF1

NPV

CF2

CF3

I = 18.78 = NPVL

11 - 11

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

What is Project S’s NPV?

70 2050

0 1 2 310%

Project S:

-100.00

63.64

41.32

15.0319.99 = NPVS

11 - 12

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Calculator Solution

Enter in CFLO for S:

-100

70

50

20

10

CF0

CF1

NPV

CF2

CF3

I = 19.98 = NPVS

11 - 13

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Rationale for the NPV Method

NPV = PV inflows – Cost= Net gain in wealth.

Accept project if NPV > 0.

Choose between mutually exclusive projects on basis ofhigher NPV. Adds most value.

11 - 14

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Using NPV method, which project(s) should be accepted?

If Projects S and L are mutually exclusive, accept S because NPVs > NPVL .

If S & L are independent, accept both; NPV > 0.

11 - 15

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Internal Rate of Return: IRR

0 1 2 3

CF0 CF1 CF2 CF3

Cost Inflows

IRR is the discount rate that forcesPV inflows = cost. This is the sameas forcing NPV = 0.

11 - 16

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

.NPV

k1CF

tt

n

0t

.0

IRR1CF

tt

n

0t

NPV: Enter k, solve for NPV.

IRR: Enter NPV = 0, solve for IRR.

11 - 17

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

What’s Project L’s IRR?

10 8060

0 1 2 3IRR = ?

-100.00

PV3

PV2

PV1

0 = NPV

Enter CFs in CFLO, then press IRR:IRRL = 18.13%.

11 - 18

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Finding IRR Without a Financial Calculator

Find the NPV first. If the NPV is positive, then try an IRR > WACC.

Project L, Try 20%:

100 =(10*1/1.2)+(60*1/(1.2)2) +(80*1/(1.2)3)

100=96.30 Need higher PV, so lower IRR

Answer 10%<IRR<20%, accept (WACC = 10%)

11 - 19

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

What’s Project S’s IRR?

70 2050

0 1 2 3IRR = ?

-100.00

PV3

PV2

PV1

0 = NPV

Enter CFs in CFLO, then press IRR:IRRS = 23.56%.

11 - 20

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Finding IRR Without a Financial Calculator

Find the NPV first. If the NPV is positive, then try an IRR > WACC.

Project S, Try 12%:

100 =(70*1/1.12)+(50*1/(1.12)2) +(20*1/(1.12)3)

100=116.60 Need lower PV, so higher IRR

Answer IRR>12%, accept (WACC = 10%)

11 - 21

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

90 109090

0 1 2 10IRR = ?

Q. How is a project’s IRRrelated to a bond’s YTM?

A. They are the same thing.A bond’s YTM is the IRRif you invest in the bond.

-1134.2

IRR = 7.08% (use TVM or CFLO).

...

11 - 22

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Rationale for the IRR Method

If IRR > WACC, then the project’s rate of return is greater than its cost--some return is left over to boost stockholders’ returns.

Example: WACC = 10%, IRR = 15%. Profitable.

11 - 23

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

IRR Acceptance Criteria

If IRR > k, accept project.

If IRR < k, reject project.

11 - 24

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Decisions on Projects S and L per IRR

If S and L are independent, accept both. IRRs > k = 10%.

If S and L are mutually exclusive, accept S because IRRS > IRRL .

11 - 25

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Prefer NPV to IRR

Can have multiple IRR’s if you have non-normal cash flows.

Can get different results depending on the WACC used when ranking projects using NPV and IRR.

Reinvestment rate assumption makes more sense with NPV than with IRR.

11 - 26

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reinvestment Rate Assumptions

NPV assumes reinvest at k (opportunity cost of capital).

IRR assumes reinvest at IRR.

Reinvest at opportunity cost, k, is more realistic, so NPV method is best. NPV should be used to choose between mutually exclusive projects.