Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts 2007

Разом до Здоров’я фінансується Агенством США з Міжнародного Розвитку та впроваджується корпорацією Інститут Дослідництва та Тренінгів JSI у співробітництві з Академією Сприяння Освіті та Школою Громадського Здоров’я Гарвардського Університету

Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts

2007

Tymoshevska Viktoriya,M&E Coordinator,

“Together for Health” project

Baseline Assessment (BL) Objectives

• To document the initial status of family planning/reproductive health (FP/RH) in five oblasts – Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn - specifically regarding:– Attitudes of women of reproductive age (WRA) and

health providers toward FP methods;– Practices of WRA (use of services and

contraceptives);– Practices of providers (counseling on FP/RH), as

reported by WRA and by providers;– Availability of IEC materials and contraceptives in

health facilities and pharmacies;

• To identify areas that need improvement.

Baseline Assessment Methodology

• Timeline: Dnipropetrovsk – July 2007 Odessa - November 2007 Poltava – May 2007 Volyn oblast – April 2007 Vinnytsa – June 2007 Randomly selected health facilities that provide FP/RH services

• Healthcare facilities: inpatient and outpatient;

• Clients (WRA) not being treated for infertility or infertile;

• Pharmacies: private and public;

• Health providers: ob-gyns, nurses and midwives who work in health facilities that provide FP/RH services.

Baseline Sample Characteristics

Dnipro Odessa

Poltava

Vinnytsa Volyn Overall

Clients interviewed

337 332 327 320 330 1,646

Health Facilities Assessed

22 22 21 21 22 108

Pharmacies Assessed

67 64 67 62 67 327

Providersinterviewed

95 100 90 94 101 480

Respondents’ (WRA) Characteristics

Oblast Mean age

Marital Status

Married or in union

Single Divorced or widowed

Dnipropetrovsk 29 76.8% 11.6% 9.5%

Odessa 28 80.7% 10.5% 7.2%

Poltava 29 77.1% 12.5% 7.3%

Vinnytsa 28 84.4% 9.4% 5.0%

Volyn 27 79.1% 14.2% 3.0%

Purpose of Visit to Health Facility

Oblast Consul-tation

Annual check-

up

F/U visit

FP services

Abortion Delivery Antenatal care

Dnipro-petrovsk

25% 29% 11% 7% 9% 6% 14%

Odessa 30% 15% 12% 10% 10% 7% 17%

Poltava 27% 20% 6% 10% 7% 8% 22%

Vinnytsa 30% 10% 4% 6% 2% 24% 23%

Volyn 27% 21% 9% 5% 1% 14% 23%

Attitudes of Clients & Providers to

Contraception

WRA with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception: Condoms, IUDs, COCs

56% 58%59%

70% 69%

61%

65%61%

52% 51%56%

61%

54%52%

44%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Condoms IUD COC

DneproOdessaPoltavaVinnitsaVolyn

WRA with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception: Injectables, LAM, EC

12%

14%

10%

12%

7%

16%

24%

17%17%

20% 20%

23%

15%15%

14%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Injectables LAM Emergency contr

Dnepro

Odessa

Poltava

Vinnitsa

Volyn

Health Providers with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception:

Condoms, IUDs, COCs

64%

73%

67%72%

83%

95%

82%

89%

71%78%

98%94%

91%

99%

85%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Condoms IUD COC


Health Providers with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception:

Injectables, LAM, EC

39%

30%31%36%

31%

46%

64%

27%

55% 54%

26%23%

20%

31%26%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Injectables LAM Emergency contr

Dnepro

Odessa

Poltava

Vinnitsa

Volyn

Clients’ Practices:Use of Contraception

Contraceptive Use among Respondents

WRA leaving health facilities

50%

42%

33%28% 30%

7% 7%7%4%

8%

43%

52%

60%

68%62%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Total, Modern Methods Total, Traditional Methods Not Using


Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast


COCs, 12%

IUD, 11%

Condoms, 26%

LAM, 0% Natural FP, 7%Emergency contr,

1%

Spermicides, 3%

Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Odessa Oblast


Condoms, 20%

COCs, 13%

IUD, 6%

Spermicides, 3%

Emergency contr, 1%

Natural FP, 7%

Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Poltava Oblast


Condoms, 14%

COCs, 10%

IUD, 10%

Spermicides, 3%LAM, 1%

Natural FP, 7%

Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Vinnytsa Oblast


Condoms, 16%

COCs, 9%

IUD, 5%

Spermicides, 3%

Natural FP, 4%

Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Volyn Oblast


Condoms, 19%

COCs, 8%

IUD, 6%

Spermicides, 2%

Emergency contr, 2%

Natural FP, 8%

Providers’ Practices:FP/RH

Counseling and Services

WRA Reporting Receiving Key Information during FP Counseling

78%74%

71%

74%

61%

73%70%

67%65%

51%

69%70%66%

63%

50%

71% 71%

67%67%

50%

70%

58%61%

64%

51%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Differentmethods

Advant/Disadvant

Side effects How to use When to return


WRA Reporting Receiving Counseling on 3 out of 5 Key FP Topics

72% 71% 67% 68%

54%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

FP/RH Counseling on 3 out of 5 topics


WRA Reporting Receiving Counseling on Key STI Topics

75%

64%

75% 75%

53%

75%72%72% 72%

56%

85%81%

77% 76%

63%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Symptoms of STIs Prevention of STIs Condoms


WRA Reporting Receiving Counseling on 2 out of 3 Key STI Topics

79%

71%74%

73%

55%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

STIs counseling on 2 out of 3 topics


WRA Assessments of Health Providers’ Practices

95%96%

95%95%93%

32%

89%91%90%

86%

92%95%

91%93%

86%

94%95% 93%93%

89%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Was Respectful Spoke clearly Listened attentively Permittedquestions


WRA Perceptions of Services atHealth Facilities

69% 70%

51%57%

35%

77% 78%

69%

78%

69%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Good services Recommend this facility to friends


Health Providers’ Self-Reported FP Counseling Practices

91%

84%78%

69%

84%87%

79%

70%70%69%

86%86%

74%

69%68%

96%

86%

81%84%

89%91%

84%

77%

86%

72%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Different methods Advant/ Disadvant Side effects How to use When to return


Health Providers’ Self-Reported Counseling on 3 out of 5 Key FP Topics

96%

90%

81%79% 82%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

FP/RH Counseling on 3 out of 5 topics


Health Providers Self-Reported STI Counseling Practices

78%80%

62%

68%64%

75%

87%

72%77%

69%

79%

85%

76%

85%

62%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Symptoms of STIs Prevention of STIs Condoms


Health Providers’ Self-Reported Counseling on 2 out of 3 Key STI Topics

78%84%

72%79%

65%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

STIs counseling on 2 out of 3 topics


Availability of Contraceptive Methods/

Brands in Health Facilities and Pharmacies

Availability of any Free FP Method in Health Facilities

64%

27%

14%

36%

14%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Dnepro Odessa Poltava Vinnytsa Volyn

Availability of Free COCs in Health Facilities

0%

5%

32%

5%

0%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%


Availability of Free Condoms in Health Facilities

9%

14% 14%

0%

32%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%


Availability of Free IUDs in Health Facilities

50%

32%

14%

10%

27%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


Availability of Selected COC Brands in Pharmacies at Average Price BELOW 30 UAH

9%

43%

70%

14%

53%55%

39%

67%

0%

61%

39%

87%

60%64%

61%

66%

45%

12%

65%

55%

74%

48%

10%

45%46%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cilest23.29

Lindinette27.60

Rigevidon9.25

Novinette19.49

Regulon16.94

DneproOdessaPoltavaVinnytsaVolyn

Product average prices in UAH are indicated under the brand names.

61%

70%

42%

54%

48%

75%78%

47%

23%

56% 64%

59%62%

69%67%

64%60%

73%

9%

71%74% 74%

84%

23%

46%

58%

67% 69%

46%

9%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Mercilon44.61

Marvelon47.88

Yarina68.11

Jeanine54.44

Logest38.96

Diane-3546.67


Availability of Selected COC Brands in Pharmacies at Average Price ABOVE 30 UAH

Availability of other Hormonal Contraceptive Brands in Pharmacies

90%

3% 3% 3% 4%

19%

9%

22%2%

84%

27%30%

16%

25%

81%

7%7%

15%

81%

11%15%

6%

66%

4%

13%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Novaring76.13

Exluton46.75

Depo-Provera40.38

Evra patch89.02

Postinor27.28


Availability of IUDs and Condoms in Pharmacies

28%31%

36%

76%

9%

31% 30%

22%

81%

19%22%

27%30%

85%

8%

29% 29%

19%

81%

0%

25% 27%31%

90%

7%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Pregna24.22

Multiload185.21

Nova T52.30

Junona31.80

Condoms3.13


Availabilityof Informational/Educational

(IEC) Materials in Health Facilities and Pharmacies

Availability of non-TfH IEC Materials on FP/RHin Health Facilities

82%

73% 76% 76%

59%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Total


Posters on FP Brochures about FP

82%

59%

81% 81%

59%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Total

Almost all IEC materials

promote specific brands

Availability of (non-TfH) IEC Materials on FP/RH in Pharmacies

31%

14%

42%

24%21%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Total


40%

31% 30%27%

13%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Total


Posters on FP Brochures on FP

Conclusions & Implications

About the Study• Sample sizes and characteristics of the respondents were very

similar across all five oblasts.

Clients (WRA)

• Average age was 27-29;

• Marital status – either married or in union (>75% of all respondents);

• Main reasons for visiting the health facility were:

– Consultation

– Annual check-up

– Antenatal care;

• Abortion and FP services comprised almost equal proportions of the reasons women visited health facilities—and was around 7%

About the Study

Health Facilities:

• Approximately 50% of all health facilities surveyed in all oblasts were in-patient (e.g. maternities, ob/gyn departments) and the rest were outpatient (e.g. women consultations, FP centers);

• On average each health facility had 5-8 ob-gyns, 7-10 midwives, 2 feldshers;

Health Providers:

• The majority of respondents where either ob-gyns or midwives; in a few cases they were nurses and feldshers;

• On average, 3-5 health providers per health facility were asked to fill in the self-administered questionnaire;

Pharmacies:

• Over 70% of all assessed pharmacies were privately-owned and belonged to a chain;

• One-third of pharmacies were located in the health facility that was assessed; the rest were located 500-1000 meters from the health facility;

• Each pharmacy had 1-2 provisors, 2 pharmacists and 1 sales person;

Attitudes toward FP Methods

• The attitudes of WRA toward modern contraceptive methods were similar across all five oblasts: over 60% had a positive attitude toward condoms, IUDs and COCs (the three most widely used modern FP methods)—but there is still much work to be done;

• Attitudes toward injectables and emergency contraception (EC) are quite negative: on average only 17% of WRA have positive attitudes toward EC and about 12% towards injectables;

• Health providers have more positive attitudes to FP methods than WRA and, by providing quality FP counseling, have an opportunity to change attitudes of WRA and break existing barriers;

Contraceptive Use (I)

Contraceptive use varied across oblasts:

• Use of modern methods differed substantially between the oblasts:

– Highest use rate was in Dnipropetrovsk - 50% of respondents;

– Lowest use rate was in Vinnytsa – 28%;

– Odessa, Poltava and Volyn ranged from 30 to 40%;

• Use of traditional methods was similar across oblasts – 7-8% (except Vinnytsa 4%);

• The percentage of non-users ranged from 43% in Dnipropetrovsk to 68% in Vinnytsa;

Contraceptive Use (II)

• The method mix was very similar across all oblasts:

– Condom use was around 20% (from 26% in Dnipropetrovsk to 14% in Poltava);

– Use of COCs ranged from 8% in Volyn to 13% in Odessa;

– Lowest IUD use was in Odessa, Vinnytsa and Volyn--5%-6%; highest was in Dnipropetrovsk and Poltava--10%-11%;

– EC and spermicides were rarely used, according to respondents:• Only 3% of respondents across all oblasts used

spermicides;

• Only 1% used EC in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa and Volyn;

Contraceptive Use (III)

• It is unclear why modern contraceptive use patterns are so different across the oblasts;

• WRA still rely on only a few modern contraceptive methods: IUDs, condoms and COCs;

• Women need more information about the range of modern methods, their risks and benefits so they can make informed decision about which method they will be using.

• Women reported that about 70% of health providers in all oblasts cover at least 3 out of 5 key topics during FP counseling (except Volyn – 54%);

• Women reported that two thirds of health providers across the oblasts cover 2 out of 3 key topics in STI counseling (except Volyn – 55%);

• Some oblasts need to improve the quality of FP/RH and STI counseling;

FP and STI Counseling (I)

FP and STI Counseling (II)

• Health providers state that they provide more information than is reported by the women:

– On average 85% of health providers across the oblasts state that they always mention at least 3 out of 5 key FP topics;

– And 75% of health providers in all oblasts state that they always mention at least 2 out of 3 key STI topics;

• Overall, availability of free FP methods was low:

– Highest in Dnipropetrovsk - 64% of health facilities;

– Lowest in Poltava and Vinnytsa - 14% of health facilities;

• Free COCs were available in 32% of health facilities in Dnipropetrovsk but only 5% in Odessa and Poltava;

• Free IUDs were available in all oblasts, ranging from Dnipropetrovsk – 50% to Poltava - 10%;

• Male condoms were available in 32% of health facilities in Volyn, 14% in Odessa and Vinnytsa, and 9% in Dnipropetrovsk;

• More efforts should be made to improve availability of free contraceptives for eligible clients.

Availability of Free FP Methods in Health Facilities

• Availability of COCs costing under 30 UAH in pharmacies varied considerably across the oblasts:

– Cilest was available on average in 12% of surveyed pharmacies (except Volyn - 0%);

– Regulon and Rigevidon were the most widely available affordable brands: about 65% of pharmacies across all oblasts;

• Availability of COCs costing above 30 UAH was similar for most of the brands (except Yarina and Mercilon)

• Availability of Depo-Provera ranged from 25% of pharmacies in Odessa to 6% in Vinnytsa;

• Availability of the progestin-only pill Exluton was highest in Dnipropetrovsk – 16% and very low in Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn – 3%;

Availability of FP Methods in Pharmacies (I)

Availability of FP Methods in Pharmacies (II)

• Availability of IUDs ranged from 10% for Pregna to 30% for Multiload, Junona and Nova- T across the oblasts;

• Results of assessments suggest further efforts are needed to:

– Improve the availability of affordable brands of COCs;

– Improve the availability of an expanded range of methods (injectable and progestin-only pill).

• Availability of IEC materials on FP methods (not TfH materials) in health facilities was satisfactory in all oblasts:

– Over 70% of health facilities had posters about FP (except Volyn--59%);

– Over 80% of health facilities in Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava and Vinnytsa had brochures about FP methods; and about 60% in Odessa and Volyn Oblasts;

• Availability of IEC materials (not TfH materials) in pharmacies was low in all oblasts:

– Less than 30% had a poster on FP methods (except Poltava--42%);

– Less than 30% had a brochure on FP methods (except Dnipropetrovsk – 40%);

• IEC materials almost always promoted specific brands, pointing to the need for unbiased information about a broad range of FP methods.

Availability of IEC materials

THANK YOU!

This presentation is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.

Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts 2007

Documents

Transcript of Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts 2007