Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
-
Upload
parents-coalition-of-montgomery-county-maryland -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
1/172
1
1
2 THE BALTIMORE CITY
3 BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS
4 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
5
6 200 EAST NORTH AVENUE FIRST
7 FLOOR BOARD ROOM
8 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21202
9
10 SPECIAL BUSINESS MEETING
11
12 July 24, 2012
13 6:00 P.M.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 REPORTED BY:
21 D. Brown
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
2/172
2
1 BOARD MEMBERS:
2 NEIL DUKE - BOARD CHAIR
3 ANDRS ALONSO - CEO
4 STUDENT COMM.
5 TINA HIKE HUBBARD
6 JERRELLE FRANCOIS
7 MAXINE J. WOOD
8 ROBERT W. HECK
9 SHANAYSHA SAULS - Not Present
10 DAVID STONE
11 LISA AKCHIN
12 MARNELL COOPER - Not Present
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
3/172
3
1 I N D E X
2 Call to Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3 Moment of Silence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4 Pledge of Allegiance. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5 Consent Agenda. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6 Chairman's Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7 Ethics Panel Introductions . . . . . . .10
8 CEO's Comments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
9 PEP Announcement . . . . . . . . . . . .24
10 MSA Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
11 Public Comment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56
12 Kim Truhardt . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57
13 Action Items. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60
14 Appeals and Hearings . . . . . . . . . .60
15 Procurement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62
16 Information and Discussion. . . . . . . . . 111
17 School Effectiveness Review. . . . . . 111
18 Code of Ethics Policy 2nd Reader. . . .139
19 Charter School Renewal . . . . . . . . 144
20 Delayed Openings 2nd Reader . . . . . .163
21 Announcement of Meetings. . . . . . . . . . 172
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
4/172
4
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
2 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Good evening,
3 everyone. We're going to get started with
4 tonight's Board meeting. Before we do so, I
5 should note a few facts.
6 First, thank you for being patient with
7 us. We have a number of you who are here happily
8 awaiting appointments for this evening, I
9 suspect, given the large size of the room.
10 COMMISSIONER FRANCOIS: And they can
11 stay to the end of the meeting.
12 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Yes, we can only
13 hope so based on Commissioner Francois'
14 suggestion. We do not have the presentation of
15 colors this evening.
16 But, I would like to start off on a
17 more somber note. That would be this. As the
18 nation mourns the passing of a number of lives in
19 Colorado based on a senseless act of random
20 violence, we're also reminded of the preciousness
21 of life here in Baltimore City and we do have the
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
5/172
5
1 occasion to mourn the passing of several members
2 of our school community. I would ask you to bear
3 with me as I note these particular passings.
4 First, with respect to Dr. Evelyn
5 Valentine, a nationally known educator and
6 business woman. During her career, she had the
7 pleasure of serving as a teacher, a department
8 head, an assistant principal, principal at Lake
9 Clifton High School, and Central Office
10 administrator in Baltimore City Public Schools.
11 Also, in the memory of Beatrice Dorsey
12 who was a retired school teacher. She served
13 some 29 years of dedicated service to city
14 schools. At the time of separation, she was a
15 Master Teacher at City Springs Elementary.
16 Camilla Russell was a retired office
17 assistant at Belmont Elementary. She had 39
18 years of dedicated service to city schools. At
19 the time of separation, she was working at
20 Belmont Elementary School.
21 Willie Battle, a life that never
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
6/172
6
1 reached the fullness of its blossom. He was an
2 11th grader at Baltimore Liberation Diploma Plus
3 High School. Finally, also another life cut
4 short. Deshawn Satchell was a 9th grader at
5 Baltimore Community School.
6 With respect to each of their passings,
7 I would ask that you engage with us as a Board in
8 this moment of brief silence.
9
10 (Moment of Silence)
11
12 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Thank you for your
13 indulgence. If you could all rise with the Board
14 for the Pledge of Allegiance.
15
16 (Pledge of Allegiance)
17
18 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Thank you. Please
19 be seated. Now, on to tonight's agenda. With
20 respect to our Consent Agenda, Consent Agenda
21 meaning items that have been removed from action
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
7/172
7
1 item status tonight because they have been
2 resolved and may or may not bear further
3 commentary or presentation of the Board.
4 The following items have not been
5 approved by way of the Consent Agenda. They are
6 as follows. Procurement items 7.1, 8.1, 8.6,
7 8.8, 9.3, 9.5, 11.1 and 11.2, 11.3, and also
8 pulled from tonight's agenda is 14.1, in the
9 event that it's reflected on the agenda for this
10 evening.
11 So, those are the items that have been
12 removed from the action items for the evening. I
13 believe there was also one appeals and hearings
14 matter that was also pulled or perhaps it's being
15 tabled for tonight. Or pulled in completion? It
16 is 6.11. We'll also note that 6.11 is being
17 pulled from the Consent Agenda as well.
18 According to my notes, that reflects
19 the extent of the items that are being pulled
20 from the Consent Agenda. To the extent that a
21 prior Boarddocs or internet site references third
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
8/172
8
1 reader for the BLA, BLB and BLC series, those
2 actions that would have been scheduled for third
3 reader are also being deferred for tonight.
4 So, with that recap, unless there is
5 anything else that I have missed, I will
6 entertain a motion for the approval of tonight's
7 Consent Agenda.
8 COMMISSIONER HECK: So moved.
9 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: By Commissioner
10 Heck.
11 COMMISSIONER FRANCOIS: Second.
12 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Second by
13 Commissioner Francois. All those in favor of the
14 Consent Agenda, signify by saying aye.
15 SPEAKERS: Aye.
16 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: All those opposed?
17 Abstentions or recusals? Consent Agenda thus
18 passes.
19 Next on tap would be Chairman's
20 Comments. I am going to have, indeed, the great
21 privilege of introducing some very fine members
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
9/172
9
1 of our audience tonight. To include our very own
2 state Senator, Catherine Pugh. (Applause.) I am
3 very much aware of the fact that it is not often
4 that we have both a celebrity as well as a
5 locally elected official in our presence. So,
6 your presence is deeply appreciated. We know
7 that you are very much in tune with what goes on
8 in city schools. You've been very supportive of
9 all of our efforts in Annapolis since you've been
10 elected to office. You are a valuable member of
11 what we consider to be our team. Especially now
12 that you have a little bit of a rooting interest
13 in a certain aspect of city schools. So, we'll
14 get on to that in short order.
15 So, let me give you a little bit more
16 of a backdrop. As part of our duties as a Board,
17 we need to make sure that we make all of our
18 decisions in the most open and honest way
19 possible. We need to ensure that the integrity
20 of the process is always item one on our agenda.
21 We know that there are going to be
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
10/172
10
1 times, because of complications or complexities
2 of issues, that we're going to have questions.
3 We're not a perfect Board and we don't pretend to
4 be. But, we need that layer of additional
5 support.
6 I'm very proud to introduce what that
7 layer of additional support is going to be this
8 evening. Those would be the members of the
9 Baltimore Public Schools' Ethics Panel.
10 We have five members of our Ethics
11 Panel. They, like us as a Board, serving in a
12 non-compensated fashion because they truly care
13 and are deeply committed to city schools and our
14 progress. And, also, ensuring that we, again,
15 make our decisions in the light of day and that
16 we are diligent to our efforts to give fair and
17 impartial and reasonable analysis to everything
18 we do as city schools' Board members.
19 I'd like to introduce the four members
20 that are present and also read their bio's, in
21 addition to the one members who was not able to
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
11/172
11
1 be with us this evening.
2 Before doing that, I want to make one
3 other commentary about our Ethics Panelists.
4 You'll find out in a few short seconds that these
5 folks are super talented and I like to think of
6 them as our better angels. These are folks that
7 we would like to aspire to be based on what
8 they've done in their professional lives and what
9 they're going to bring to bear as our Ethics
10 Panelists.
11 These folks are super impressive and
12 we're very glad to have them. I don't think
13 there's a finer Ethics Panel in all of the state.
14 Now that I've built them up, I think
15 it's time to introduce them to you as the school
16 community. The first introduction will be the
17 one member of the Ethics Panel who is not
18 present. So, she will not stand and accept her
19 acknowledgment. Her name is Letina Green,
20 Esquire. Yes, she is an attorney. Ms. Green is
21 currently employed with the Social Security
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
12/172
12
1 Administration. She was appointed a member of
2 the Senior Executive Service in September of
3 2007. She has held Executive leadership
4 positions in Human Resources, Operations and
5 Retirement and Disability Policy, and served as
6 Special Assistant to the Chief of Staff.
7 Prior to the SES, Ms. Green assumed
8 increasing levels of responsibility in the area
9 of labor and employee relations. Ms. Green
10 served as Chairman of Baltimore City's Board of
11 Municipal and Zoning Appeals from August of 2005
12 to September of 2006, as well as a Board member
13 for three years prior. She has also served as a
14 Hearing Officer for the Baltimore Civil Service
15 Commission from April of 2005 to May of 2006.
16 Ms. Green received her Bachelor's
17 Degree, Magna Cum Laude, from the University of
18 Baltimore and obtained a JD with Honors from the
19 University of Baltimore School of Law. I can
20 attest to that fact because she was my study
21 partner for the Bar examination. Were it not for
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
13/172
13
1 her, who knows what I'd be doing right now. But,
2 I'm certain it would have been probably studying
3 for the Bar examination yet again and again and
4 again.
5 She presently lives in Mount Washington
6 with her husband, Aaron, and her daughter, Layla.
7 She is a fine addition to our Ethics Panel. She
8 is not able to be present tonight. Actually,
9 she's doing an all-nighter in her office
10 preparing for testimony before Congress tomorrow.
11 So, that goes to show her level of involvement in
12 Social Security and the bigger picture as well.
13 The folks who are here, we'll start off
14 with Mr. Paris Lee. Mr. Lee is a resident of
15 West Baltimore. He has worked in a number of
16 state and local government offices such as the
17 Mayor's Office of Baltimore City and the Maryland
18 Department of Transportation.
19 The father of three boys, he has
20 studied in the central Mexican town of Taxico and
21 is open to learning about different cultures. He
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
14/172
14
1 is new to the experience to participating on a
2 Board, but hopes that his presence will not only
3 be an opportunity for himself but for others to
4 identify other ways to help in the city in which
5 they live. Mr. Lee, I attended his interview to
6 be on the Ethics Panel personally. I say he is
7 truly going to be an asset to the Ethics Panel.
8 I introduce to the audience at large, Mr. Paris
9 Lee. (Applause.)
10 Next, Ms. Nicole Leonard. Also a JD
11 and also possesses an MBA. She is the Deputy
12 Director of the Johns Hopkins University's School
13 of Medicine, Office of Research Administration.
14 Ms. Leonard earned her law degree from North
15 Carolina Central University in 2000 and is a
16 member of the Maryland Bar. She earned her MBA
17 from Johns Hopkins University's Carey Business
18 School in 2012.
19 Ms. Leonard began her career as a
20 licensing professional in academic technology and
21 transferred to Duke University in 1998 which was
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
15/172
15
1 followed by a short tenure at the National Heart,
2 Lung and Blood Institute at the National
3 Institutes of Health before joining Johns Hopkins
4 University.
5 In 2006, she shifted gears and became a
6 research administrator. She has served on many
7 academic committees including the Johns Hopkins
8 University School of Medicine's Committee on
9 Outside Interests and the Carey Business School
10 Honor Council.
11 I can say this with respect to Ms.
12 Leonard, as you can tell, she's not only
13 brilliant but she takes a mean set of minutes. I
14 reviewed the minutes from the first Ethics Panel
15 meetings, or one of the back-up Ethics Panel
16 meetings and it is really a prototype of what I
17 would hope anyone's committee meetings look like.
18 They are flawless and I was deeply impressed. I
19 don't get impressed by written work too often.
20 But, kudos to Ms. Leonard. They've obviously
21 selected the right person to serve, at least on a
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
16/172
16
1 temporary basis, as secretary. I introduce Ms.
2 Leonard. (Applause.)
3 Next would be Aaron Murkey, Esquire.
4 I'm sensing a general trend in our Ethics Panel.
5 Mr. Murkey is a graduate of the University of
6 Maryland, Baltimore County, Magna Cum Laude, and
7 the University of Maryland, School of Law, Cum
8 Laude. Mr. Murkey has had an avid involvement in
9 the Maryland educational community through his
10 service as a student member for the Maryland
11 State Board of Education and, this summer, with
12 the Maryland State Department of Education as the
13 Maryland Governor's intern. Furthermore, he is
14 clerk for the United State's District Court for
15 the Honorable Susan Garvey. Mr. Murkey has also
16 served as the President and Vice President of the
17 Board of Directors for the Free State Legal
18 Project, Inc.
19 Mr. Murkey recently left Venable, one
20 of the largest law firms in the State of Maryland
21 and, indeed, the mid-Atlantic, to become the
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
17/172
17
1 Executive Director of the Free State Legal
2 Project which provides pro bono legal services to
3 low-income LGBT individuals and families.
4 Mr. Murkey is going to be a wonderful
5 addition to our Ethics Panel. He brings a very
6 sharp, analytical mind and the willingness,
7 obviously, from his prior participation as a
8 student member, to be part of our educational
9 process. So, Mr. Murkey, I introduce you to our
10 wider audience. (Applause.)
11 Wasn't it Shakespeare who uttered the
12 quote about attorneys and doing away with them?
13 Ignore. Shakespeare was vastly overrated, I
14 believe.
15 Last but certainly not least in our
16 introductions is Mr. Benjamin A. Neal, Esquire.
17 Mr. Neal is a full professor of legal studies at
18 Towson University. He has published numerous
19 academic journal articles on various legal
20 topics, as well as presenting at a number of
21 academic conferences, both nationally and
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
18/172
18
1 internationally.
2 Previously, he served as the Chair of
3 the Board of Municipal and Zoning Appeals for
4 Baltimore City under both Mayor Schmoke and Mayor
5 O'Malley. He is admitted to practice in
6 Maryland, as well as the U.S. District Court for
7 the District of Columbia, the U.S. District Court
8 for the State of Maryland, as well as the Third,
9 Fourth and Fifth Circuits of Appeals and the
10 United States Supreme Court.
11 I can share this with you, the wider
12 audience, of Mr. Neal. Whenever there is
13 discussion regarding the short list of viable
14 candidates to be elevated to the bench here in
15 the State of Maryland, Mr. Neal is certainly part
16 of that conversation.
17 Also, I should note, Mr. Neal, based on
18 his acumen, his confidence and just being an all
19 around good guy, has been selected as the present
20 Chair of our Ethics Panel. So, with that said, I
21 would introduce you to Mr. Benjamin A. Neal,
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
19/172
19
1 Esquire. Kudos, sir. (Applause.)
2 So, those are the members of our Ethics
3 Panel. They will be getting a lot of work out of
4 this particular Board. We're looking forward to
5 the product that they will provide for us. As
6 you can tell, these folks are very highly
7 competent and qualified.
8 Commissioner Francois has reminded me
9 to remind all of us what the Ethics Panel will be
10 doing. That is, basically, determining and
11 fielding questions, not only from the Board, but
12 from the school district regarding questions of
13 potential conflicts, potential matters that
14 require resolution as to the, I don't want to use
15 too many college words. The efficacy of our
16 processes.
17 As so eloquently said by Commissioner
18 Francois, to make sure that we're doing what
19 we're supposed to be doing in an ethical and
20 sound manner.
21 Again, these are highly qualified folks
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
20/172
20
1 and we're truly looking forward to their presence
2 and their contribution to city schools. With
3 that said, I'll conclude Chair comments and we'll
4 next turn to CEO comments for tonight.
5 MR. ALONSO: Good evening. I have
6 three main comments. Then, I'm going to
7 introduce lots of folks who were named on June
8 26th but couldn't be here to be recognized since
9 it was a special Board hearing. Then, some
10 wonderful folks who are here today because today
11 they are being named to new positions in the
12 school system. I'm going to close with some
13 comments and some presentation on the MSA to
14 frame some of the work that remains for us in the
15 district.
16 First of all, we want to thank all the
17 funders throughout Baltimore, as well as the
18 Mayor's Office and the Family League who help
19 support summer learning enrichment to supplement
20 the Read to Succeed summer learning program.
21 Summer learning loss is real. It is
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
21/172
21
1 important for all families to encourage their
2 students to read all summer long. There are
3 reading lists available on the city schools'
4 website and at the Pratt libraries. Please go
5 online. Please visit your local library. The
6 kids should be reading all the time.
7 Secondly, this is one of my favorite
8 events of the year. The Summer Robotics Olympiad
9 will be held on Wednesday, August 1st at the
10 Timonium Fairgrounds. Have you ever been to a
11 robotics olympiad? It's like the NCAA finals but
12 with future engineers. The level of craziness
13 and enthusiasm.
14 This event is the culmination of weeks
15 of hard work for our middle grades summer
16 robotics students. More than 150 teams are
17 expected to compete. Families and community
18 members are welcome to attend and volunteers are
19 needed to support the event and serve as judges.
20 Please visit. More information can be found,
21 again, on the city schools' website.
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
22/172
22
1 Thirdly, hundreds of teachers have
2 already completed professional development for
3 achievement unit credit so far this summer.
4 There's still some openings left for some
5 sessions. Teachers interested in enrolling in
6 summer professional development sessions should
7 check the professional growth page for more
8 information. Please sign up, take advantage of
9 the opportunities that we try to provide for you.
10 I'm going to turn to the reason why
11 many of you are here today. I want to start with
12 the June 26th PEP Report. As you know, it was a
13 special Board meeting simply to make sure that we
14 had as many people on board as possible for the
15 beginning of the new school year. Some of you
16 were not here to be recognized as you start your
17 new roles in city schools.
18 So, let me introduce you and feel free
19 to applaud, whistle, cheer. Whatever you feel
20 like doing. And, if you don't hear anybody
21 cheering, then cheer. (Laughter.) We don't want
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
23/172
23
1 anybody to feel unappreciated.
2 I'm happy to start with this person
3 because this person has come before me before.
4 Now she's going to be a managing assistant
5 principal at Bluford Drew Jemison Academy.
6 Audrey Freeman. (Applause.)
7 The new principal at Matthew A. Henson
8 Elementary School, David Guzman. (Applause.)
9 Student Support Liaison in the Student Support
10 Team, Christine Hudson. (Applause.) The new
11 principal at Afya Public Charter, Katie Marts.
12 (Applause.) I should say founding member of
13 Afya.
14 Assistant principal at Digital Harbor
15 High, Shannon Mobley. (Applause.) Educational
16 specialist in the Transportation Office, Roberta
17 Neal. You guys are so important. The kids have
18 to get to school on time.
19 Academic Content Liaison for the
20 Teaching and Learning School Team, Dan Oliver.
21 (Applause.) Academic Content Liaison for the
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
24/172
24
1 Teaching and Learning School Team, Valerie
2 Stamper. (Applause.) The new principal at
3 Francis Scott Key Elementary/Middle School, Mary
4 Boswell McComas. (Applause.)
5 The new principal at Johnston Square
6 Elementary/Middle, Raymond Braxton. (Applause.)
7 Assistant principal at Baltimore Liberation
8 Diploma Plus Academy, Michael Brown. (Applause.)
9 The new principal at the Baltimore Design School,
10 Nathan Burns. (Applause.) The new principal at
11 Curtis Bay Elementary/Middle School, Benia
12 Cartage. (Applause.)
13 The new managing assistant principal at
14 Roland Park Elementary/Middle, Nicolas Dambrosio.
15 (Applause.) While I'm at it, let me recognize
16 the former principal of Roland Park
17 Elementary/Middle who told us very late in the
18 game that she was retiring, Caroline Cole.
19 (Applause.)
20 The new principal at East Baltimore
21 Community School, Katrina Foster. (Applause.)
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
25/172
25
1 Educational Specialist in the Office of School
2 Counseling, Jasmine Graham. (Applause.) New
3 principal, former teacher at Green Street
4 Academy, Crystal Harden Lindsay. (Applause.)
5 New assistant principal at Roland Park
6 Elementary/Middle, Daniel Herrbach. (Applause.)
7 Academic Content Liaison in the
8 Teaching and Learning School Team, Melissa
9 Loftus. (Applause.) The new principal at City
10 Neighbors, Obidimma Okobi. (Applause.) The new
11 assistant principal at Mergenthaler Vocational
12 Technical High, Larry Ward. (Applause.) The new
13 principal, and this gives me joy. Not because of
14 the retiring of an exceptional principal, but I
15 think this person did a great job closing out NAF
16 at the end of last year, Tammatha Woodhouse, new
17 principal at Excel Academy. (Applause.)
18 Final person on the list, but just as
19 exceptional closing out another school, principal
20 at James McHenry Elementary School, Grace Yador.
21 (Applause.) That's a pretty outstanding group of
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
26/172
26
1 people, leaders. Congratulations to all.
2 Tremendous luck. We are here to serve you
3 because we cannot possibly succeed without you.
4 (Applause.)
5 I also want to thank the members of
6 school communities who participated in the search
7 processes in the work that went into identifying
8 finalists. I, personally, interviewed at least
9 the final two people for every single search and
10 what was remarkable was how hard it was to make
11 decisions and how much talent and good faith is
12 out there.
13 So, I want to thank the parents, the
14 teachers, the community partners who worked in
15 the School-Family Council conversations because
16 this is all about a partnership with the schools
17 and the communities. The people that are here
18 today are the result of a lot of hard work.
19 I didn't see this person before but I
20 just saw her. I also want to recognize my new
21 Executive Assistant, Rashi Jawade. (Applause.)
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
27/172
27
1 She is doing a double job until we get somebody
2 to do the work that she used to do and the work
3 that she is now doing.
4 Let me turn to the question of our
5 recent Maryland School Assessment scores. I'm
6 willing to frame my comments in the context of
7 the present and also in the context of what has
8 happened in the district over time. I think I
9 will wait for everybody who is going to leave, to
10 leave. (Laughter.)
11 So, in trying to place the results in
12 the context of what has happened over time and
13 what needs to happen in the future. We are in an
14 interesting point in our evolution as a school
15 system. For many years, the system was making
16 incremental progress. Incremental progress with
17 points along that progress where certain things
18 were not moving. For example, our middle grades
19 scores.
20 Then, five years ago, the progress
21 accelerated and accelerated quite remarkably. In
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
28/172
28
1 the past two years, what we are seeing is our
2 pushing with huge concerns around how we're going
3 to now take the next leap in the work. That work
4 is happening in a context where we know that our
5 standards are changing, we know that there are
6 new assessments that are coming that are actually
7 going to be far more rigorous than the
8 assessments that we are taking right now, where
9 what our kids need to know and be able to do is
10 going to be different.
11 The game is being raised and we're
12 struggling to push forward in some areas. At the
13 same time, we're making enormous progress in
14 certain other areas. For example, graduation.
15 The cutting of the drop-out rate.
16 Part of what I'm going to highlight in
17 these comments is some of the things that I think
18 are contributing to our pause, some of the things
19 that are going to help us move forward, some of
20 the things that I feel matter tremendously. I
21 have to say, one of my friends in the work told
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
29/172
29
1 me that this is an opportunity to articulate that
2 we should not necessarily define ourselves by how
3 we do on MSA tests.
4 But, I have to say that these results
5 are incredibly important. Even if the tests are
6 not the best tests, even if they do not define
7 everything that our kids should know, if we are
8 struggling to make progress in any way, then
9 that's an opportunity to really reflect on our
10 work. It's work that we own as a school system.
11 I really push back on the notion that it is about
12 any sector of schools, that it is about a
13 superintendent. It is about a community coming
14 together to try to figure out how to work for
15 every single child. If the theory of action
16 continues to be that the schools are the center
17 of the world, that there is huge capacity in
18 schools, then there is huge opportunity for an
19 ongoing conversation about what we're missing,
20 what we can do in response and really about
21 ownership and responsibility in every single
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
30/172
30
1 school. It's too easy to point the finger at a
2 program, a component of the work. It's about all
3 of us. Including parents in this conversation.
4 So, I'm going to start by summarizing
5 where we are. Where we are is, in math, the
6 scores went up by two points. In reading, the
7 scores went down by roughly one and a half
8 points.
9 Where we've come from, and we need to
10 keep sight of this in the context of the district
11 and its history, that we have made extraordinary
12 progress in the past five years. To not
13 highlight that progress is to rob our schools and
14 our kids of the enormous success that they have
15 had.
16 Since 2007, for example, the percentage
17 of students and proficient and advanced grew by
18 53 percent. This is huge. This is in math. In
19 reading, that growth was roughly 20 percent. We
20 were higher in reading than in math going back.
21 What has happened over the past five years is
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
31/172
31
1 there has been an acceleration in math and, in
2 reading, a stagnation in the elementary schools
3 and huge growth in the middle grades.
4 What you see over time is, in the past
5 five years, a huge jump in the middle grades
6 while the elementary grades have remained mainly
7 flat.
8 The next set of information really,
9 this is math, by the way, talks about certain
10 things that get hidden by the data. For example,
11 over the past five years, the number of students
12 at advanced has doubled. So, 100 percent
13 increase in the number of kids performing at
14 advanced. That matters tremendously because part
15 of what we want to see is not simply a movement
16 of non- performing kids to a standard of
17 performance, we want to see every child improve
18 in the school system. We want to be a school
19 system for all kids.
20 The growth of kids from proficient to
21 advanced is a huge signal that something
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
32/172
32
1 different is being done in the school system.
2 At the same time, a huge decline in the
3 number of kids at basic. This is math. In
4 reading, almost exactly the same picture. The
5 growth in the number of kids in advanced in
6 reading over the past five years in 80 percent.
7 What is quite remarkable, again, is the shift in
8 middle grades in reading.
9 What is also interesting, and I've
10 alluded to this, is what is happening in the
11 grade bands. In math, if you look at grades
12 three to five, you see a jump from 2004 to 2007,
13 then another smaller jump from 2007 to 2012.
14 In the middle grades in math, however,
15 what was happening in 2004 to 2007 was progress
16 but, on average, in the middle grades in 2007,
17 only 30 percent of the kids were proficient and
18 advanced in math in the middle grades. In 8th
19 grade, the number was down to 23 percent.
20 So, while the system was improving, you
21 had the improvement in the elementary grades
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
33/172
33
1 masking a huge retrenchment in the middle grades.
2 What's happened in the last five years
3 is a huge jump, a 70 percent jump in terms of
4 math achievement in the middle grades, that I
5 think it's absolutely necessary if we're going to
6 give our high schools a chance. It's part of
7 what was problematic in the conversation about
8 achievement in the district five years ago and
9 before is that we were blaming high schools for
10 the drop-outs, but 77 percent of the kids going
11 into high school were starting high school at
12 basic.
13 One of the things we're learning from
14 the data, and I'm going to allude to a couple of
15 those slides, is that once kids are basic in 7th
16 and 8th grade, it is almost impossible to move
17 them to proficient and advanced. What our data
18 tells us is that we need to get to the kids by
19 the 6th grade because the pattern is once they're
20 in basic in math in 7th and 8th, it becomes
21 incredibly difficult to move them up.
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
34/172
34
1 Same pattern in reading but, again,
2 more pronounced in the middle grades. Again, in
3 reading, what you're seeing is progress since
4 2007. But, in the middle grades from 2004 to
5 2007, hardly any movement. Then, since 2007, a
6 31 percent increase in the number of kids at
7 proficient and advanced.
8 All this information is on the website.
9 So, if you're taking notes, all you need to do is
10 download it and print it. You're going to see
11 information about what happened at the grade
12 level in math by grade. What happened in reading
13 at the grade level. What happened by school
14 type.
15 Something very interesting is happening
16 in schools with contradictory results for math
17 and reading. Part of what is interesting this
18 year is whatever you saw happen, happened across
19 everything. As in, it happened across types of
20 principal experience, it happened across school
21 sectors, it happened across different groups of
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
35/172
35
1 kids.
2 So, in math, there was improvement.
3 For the first time ever, and this is a
4 conversation about what is happening in
5 individual schools, the traditional schools
6 outperformed charters in three to 8 math. Now,
7 that's three to 8. Part of what we now need to
8 do is disentangle it because maybe something
9 different happened in terms of elementary and
10 middle grades.
11 In reading, a reversal of that. As in,
12 charters outperformed the traditional schools.
13 But, across every single sector, you saw a
14 decline. Because the sectors are so different,
15 then part of the question that I have in terms of
16 our conversations with schools is what was going
17 on underneath? If regardless of the governance
18 structure or regardless of the academic program
19 at work, what we were seeing on average across
20 the system was a decline in reading. You would
21 have expected, even though it was a small decline
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
36/172
36
1 with some schools improving and some schools
2 declining, what you saw was that the type of
3 governance structure and the type of program did
4 not seem to predict the final results in reading.
5 It cut across the system. So, the question then
6 becomes if it's not about the program, then what
7 is it?
8 The other interesting thing which is,
9 of course, incredibly important for us is, last
10 year, when we had a decline, the decline had huge
11 variability. As in, you had many schools losing
12 20, 25, 30 points. Very few schools gaining more
13 than five points.
14 This year, the scores were very tightly
15 bunched. As in, the range, from the schools
16 losing the most to the schools gaining the most
17 was very tight. A range of roughly 20 points
18 from minus 10 to plus 10 with only a couple of
19 outliers. Which is quite significant, again, in
20 the context of something happening across the
21 entire system as opposed to last year, clearly
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
37/172
37
1 something happening that was very much tied to
2 what was happening in individual schools. The
3 number of schools losing 20 to 25 points
4 challenge any notion of statistical probability.
5 One of the things that we found was
6 that, and this is our hypothesis early and I feel
7 that it is very true, time on task matters
8 tremendously. So, after the decline of math
9 scores last year with a long history of
10 struggling with math, we found resources through
11 savings and cuts throughout the year and opened
12 83 Saturday academies in the 83 schools that had
13 the greatest challenges in the work.
14 What we see across the system is that
15 the schools that had the Saturday school gained
16 more than the schools that had no Saturday
17 school. In actuality, the schools that had no
18 Saturday school dropped almost a point from last
19 year.
20 The gains in the schools that had the
21 Saturday school masked what had happened in the
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
38/172
38
1 schools that had not received the additional
2 investment of Saturday school.
3 The notion of the meaning of time in
4 school is really supported by some of the
5 analysis that we have done on what happens with
6 kids who are chronically absent or who have been
7 suspended once or multiple times.
8 What this slide tells you is that the
9 achievement gap between kids who have never been
10 suspended and kids who have been suspended one
11 time is roughly 20 odd points in math and roughly
12 17 points in reading. The achievement gap
13 between kids who have never been suspended and
14 kids who have been suspended more than once, it's
15 almost flabbergasting. It's 33 points in math
16 and 25 points in reading. So, to my schools, and
17 this is very important to me, when we talk about
18 why the school system has been making progress or
19 not been making progress, five years ago, we drew
20 a line in the sand about suspensions and we saw a
21 huge decline in the number of suspensions. Right
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
39/172
39
1 away, we began to see huge progress. Especially
2 in the grades where the suspensions had
3 concentrated before the middle grades.
4 What has happened in the past two years
5 is a slight incremental increase in the number of
6 suspensions in the school system. We're still
7 way below where we were 7 years ago, five years
8 ago. But, we are not making progress on this
9 metric which is a proxy for achievement.
10 So, if we are sliding back into old
11 practices, why should anybody not predict that we
12 would be sliding back into old outcomes. So, the
13 question of suspension is often framed around the
14 issue of school climate. The question of
15 suspension has to be framed around a learning
16 problem for students. When kids get suspended,
17 they miss school, the root cause of why they've
18 been suspended is not addressed. This is an
19 ongoing challenge for the system.
20 We have now had two consecutive years
21 with slight upticks. If we don't start bringing
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
40/172
40
1 that number way down again, we should not be
2 expecting a different result. The definition of
3 insanity is to do the same thing and to expect
4 something different. If we go back to what
5 didn't work 10 years ago, we will get the
6 outcomes that we got five years ago.
7 What we find with suspensions is
8 completely, completely triangulated with what we
9 find with attendance. The achievement gap
10 between children who are not chronically absent
11 and children who are chronically absent is 25
12 points in math and 16 points in reading. It is
13 not a marginal number of kids. It is not about
14 what happens with somebody else's kids. We had
15 almost 4,000 students that were chronically
16 absent in both tests. We only tested roughly
17 33,000 kids. So, we're talking about 12, 13, 14
18 percent of the number of kids tested.
19 Once again, five or so years ago, we
20 made a huge dent in middle grade attendance.
21 Attendance for the middle grades improved by 10
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
41/172
41
1 percentage points in the first two years of my
2 tenure. We're incredibly glad that middle grade
3 attendance caught up to elementary attendance.
4 But, if we're not addressing the problems of
5 those kids at the margin who are not marginal,
6 they are 14 percent of the population. If those
7 numbers are not improving then the work of
8 schools becomes incredibly harder. You will see
9 some of what this means when we look at some of
10 the slides about what happens with kids who have
11 been tested on two consecutive years.
12 In the midst of these scores, then
13 there are some schools that are having
14 extraordinary success. I think that in the
15 aftermath of scores, as we try to do a kind of
16 analysis of what it meant, we forget that we need
17 to celebrate and recognize the people who are
18 doing exceptional things. So many people are
19 doing exceptional things. These schools are
20 doing quite remarkable things.
21 There are schools that have 80 percent
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
42/172
42
1 free and reduced meal populations. By the way,
2 if we had lowered that 80 percentage to 70
3 percent or 60 percent, which is the kinds of
4 schools that, in other districts, are perceived
5 to be schools with great challenges, this number
6 of schools would be much larger.
7 But, because we have been playing with
8 the words 80/80 and that comes from being a
9 baseball fan. I've been a 30/30 and 40/40 man
10 all my life. So, we picked 80/80 four years ago.
11 Then, we're stuck with a methodology so nobody
12 accuses me of padding the numbers.
13 But, some of these schools, Mary Ann
14 Winterling, Cecil, Wolfe Street Academy,
15 Armistead, Hilton, Liberty, Gardenville, Gwynns
16 Falls, Northwood, Morrell Park, Govans, Northwood
17 Appold, NACA, Thomas Jefferson, KIPP Ujima,
18 Hamden Elementary, Leithwalk, William Paca,
19 George Washington, Dallas F. Nicholas, Calvin
20 Rodwell, Hampstead Hill, these are schools that
21 have figured out a way to do something
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
43/172
43
1 exceptional. I think it's a combination of
2 community, professionals, parents, kids,
3 believing in something and making it work.
4 Every single one of these schools is a
5 potential master in the work for us. So, I just
6 want to recognize these exceptional places.
7 One of the things that I wanted to
8 highlight, and I'm not going to go over all the
9 numbers because some of my Board members would
10 kill me in the process. I know.
11 In order to truly understand what's
12 going on, you cannot simply look at test results
13 that tell you that so many kids passed the bar.
14 You want to be able to see what's going on with
15 all kids.
16 So, some of the things that I asked
17 people to do is to look at what was happening
18 with the average scale score. Meaning, the
19 average score. Not percentage of proficient and
20 advanced. How did kids do?
21 Then, I said, well, let me look at the
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
44/172
44
1 kids that are at basic. If the district is
2 improving, then you should be able to see an
3 improvement in how the kids at basic are
4 performing. That means that they're coming
5 closer to the line.
6 What you see, and this is math, is,
7 again, look how consistent the analysis is. Look
8 at what's happening in the middle grades in math
9 since 2007. Huge jumps, 11 points in 6th grade,
10 10 points in 7th grade, four points in the 8th
11 grade. One or two scale score points is enough
12 to push you over the edge. To put you over the
13 score threshold. However, if kids are starting
14 from below, then the progress has to be higher.
15 Then, I said, well, then if we're
16 concentrating on the kids below basic, then what
17 does that mean? You also want to see progress
18 for the kids who are above basic. You want to
19 see kids who have already met the threshold. Are
20 they stuck or are they improving as well?
21 When you see the average performance of
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
45/172
45
1 kids in the system, for kids who are at
2 proficient and advanced, you see exactly the same
3 picture. That is, in the 6th grade, you see a 9
4 point improvement. In the 7th grade, a 9 point
5 improvement. In the 5th grade, a five point
6 improvement.
7 This means that it's not simply about
8 getting kids over the bar. It's about are we
9 moving kids within the bands. That's part of the
10 reason why you see so many more kids moving to
11 advanced over time.
12 So, lots of slides that show you what
13 happened. In reading, the same types of
14 analysis. What we're seeing in reading is that
15 if you look at the kids in basic, in the
16 elementary schools, you still see growth in the
17 4th grade, in the 5th grade, in the 6th grade, in
18 the 7th grade, in the 8th grade. When you see
19 the kids in advanced, you see much higher jumps.
20 Part of what that suggests is that
21 we're getting a heightened level of performance
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
46/172
46
1 in terms of the kids who are already at
2 proficient and advanced. We're not seeing the
3 same level of jump in reading for the kids who
4 are at basic. Which is the reason why those
5 proficiency numbers are not jumping in reading.
6 So, you see the system improving. But,
7 the number that everybody pays attention to in
8 terms of the kids who are jumping over a certain
9 threshold, we're not making the same kind of leap
10 for the kids in basic that we're doing for the
11 kids who are at advanced.
12 So, I'm going to explain what this is
13 and what is happening because it's so powerful.
14 This shows you what happens for kids who have
15 been tested in consecutive years. For the 4th
16 grade, the top line across tells you that last
17 year in the 3rd grade, there were 73.4 percent of
18 the kids at proficient and advanced.
19 We followed those kids who got tested a
20 second time in a row in the 4th grade. Of them,
21 91 percent held at proficient and advanced. We,
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
47/172
47
1 then, followed the kids who, the year before, had
2 tested at basic in the 3rd grade and followed
3 them for one more year. Of the kids in basic, 41
4 percent jumped up into proficient and advanced.
5 So, if I'm in a school and I'm talking
6 about performance, and this is the average in the
7 system for math, you would need to say that the
8 4th grade did an amazing job because most of the
9 kids who were already proficient, remained
10 proficient. Many of the kids that were in basic
11 jumped into proficient.
12 Then, you had a bunch of kids in the
13 middle who came into the system for the first
14 time and had not been assessed. Part of what
15 shapes the numbers is what is happening in the
16 middle in terms of how kids are coming into the
17 system for the first time.
18 Part of what we see is that the numbers
19 are quite remarkable. One you get to the 7th and
20 8th grade in math, and this is a conversation at
21 the school level in terms of what is happening.
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
48/172
48
1 What you are seeing is that, on a whole, schools
2 are still pretty good at holding kids at
3 proficient and advanced.
4 This is what they're not doing, then.
5 They're not able, at this point in time, to lift
6 the kids in basic to proficient and advanced.
7 Then, and this is also highly significant, we're
8 getting huge numbers of kids coming in for the
9 first time, and this is a systemic lens, so in
10 individual schools it works very differently and
11 for many fewer kids. But, it aggregates at the
12 system level.
13 At the system level, most of the kids
14 coming into the 7th and 8th grade are already
15 coming in at basic. These kids are very
16 difficult to move.
17 So, part of the question is, well, what
18 do we do? That is the work in terms of figuring
19 out how to add time on task. How to create
20 systemic elements where we identify kids as they
21 come in and we know we have to do something
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
49/172
49
1 different with them. We cannot simply assume
2 that they can do exactly the same thing as kids
3 who have been there before.
4 So, that kind of work is there for
5 reading and for math for every single grade.
6 The final piece that I was going to
7 talk to, and it's significant in the context of
8 my announcing principals, there is a myth that
9 experience means capacity. In the best systems,
10 experience means capacity because there are good
11 results. But, when you have systems that have
12 not succeeded over time, experience doesn't
13 necessarily mean capacity. People mean capacity
14 and people need to be looked at individually in
15 the context of their work.
16 So, because I got very tired of people
17 telling me that principal turnover was part of
18 the reason why this course has slowed down, we
19 looked at the data. Guess what? If you look at
20 shifts over time, you see the data is
21 astonishingly consistent. As in, we went up in
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
50/172
50
1 math. That means that we went up in math for
2 principals no matter what their level of
3 experience was. We went down in reading. That
4 means that we went down in reading no matter the
5 level of experience of principals.
6 So, if we're going down across sectors,
7 and it's the same conversation for charters and
8 traditional schools, then you need to change the
9 conversation. If principals lose ground across
10 experience, then it cannot be about experience.
11 It's about something else.
12 If principals gain ground across
13 experience, then it cannot be about experience as
14 it is about something else. What is most
15 interesting is, in some areas of the work, it is
16 the first-year principals who have the highest
17 levels of gain in the entire system.
18 So, what does it mean when, for grades
19 6 to 8, the average gain for first-year
20 principals is 2.9 in math but the average gain
21 for the most experienced principals is 0.8. As
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
51/172
51
1 in, then stop talking to me about the experience
2 of principals and let's talk about what's going
3 on in individual schools. Because, I'm going to
4 make the decisions on the basis of how a school
5 is performing. Not on the basis of whether
6 someone has been around for 10 years, five years,
7 or three years.
8 Same with reading. As in, across, you
9 see losses in reading, you see losses in reading.
10 This is all at two years. We took it back
11 another year in order to account for any
12 variability over time.
13 Exactly the same story. If you look at
14 grades 6 to 8 in math, you have almost double the
15 loss from the most experienced principals than in
16 the first-year principals. Mind you, I have no
17 horse in this race. I am not looking to find
18 validation for first-year principals. What I am
19 doing is looking at the data, looking at
20 performance, and I want to end the myth of people
21 who are not looking at the data and come to the
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
52/172
52
1 table with the, you know, the reason something
2 happened is because of X.
3 Well, the system, over time, has had
4 huge growth. Those people who have been around
5 from the beginning of the work deserve enormous
6 respect. I recognize Caroline Kohls today
7 because she is definitely responsible for the
8 gains at Roland Park over time.
9 But, the work is about what's going on
10 with individual communities and individual
11 people. It is not about the simple answers that
12 some people bring to the table.
13 There is an enormous amount of data
14 that is available to you. The key in terms of
15 making that data available is that now we go into
16 conversations with schools. The conversations
17 are not punitive. It is about how are we going
18 to support you in this work. What do we need to
19 know together? What is it that you know that we
20 don't know? What is it that we can support you
21 with because you are struggling with how to do
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
53/172
53
1 certain things? How do we, together, address
2 this issue of kids coming in in midstream? How
3 do we tackle the issue of some grades that have
4 continued to accelerate and other grades that
5 have slowed down? That's the work.
6 In a context, by the way, that has
7 enormous integrity which we can say with greater
8 assurance than any other district in Maryland.
9 So, that's the work. The results were
10 disappointing for me because I was expecting a
11 huge bump. But, in the context of the work that
12 we've done, I think that we're doing enormous
13 good work and the people in the schools are
14 working so hard. They need so much support and
15 recognition. Every conversation should be about
16 how we are going to push our schools forward and
17 how we are going to continue to celebrate our
18 kids. That's the conversation for me. I thank
19 you.
20 I love this kind of thing. I could go
21 on for the next two hours. I know you all know
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
54/172
54
1 that. But, you get to hear me in Executive
2 Session. The public doesn't necessarily get to
3 hear me in the same way. So, I think that this
4 is the only conversation that, I shouldn't say it
5 is the only conversation that matters because
6 that would be unfair to many aspects of our work.
7 I think it's a conversation that matters so much
8 that everything has to connect to it. Even when
9 we think it makes no sense or even when we don't
10 have the answers, we need to connect it somehow.
11 So, thank you. (Applause.)
12 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Thank you, Dr.
13 Alonso. Thus concludes our CEO remarks for the
14 evening. We wanted to pull that particular
15 presentation, that was an informational
16 presentation on the MSA's, toward the front end
17 of the meeting to benefit from the larger
18 audience and also to inform the public. Cleared
19 the room. Happens every time.
20 Are there any questions regarding the
21 informational presentation by the Board? I know
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
55/172
55
1 we've dived into this information before.
2 Commissioner Stone?
3 COMMISSIONER STONE: Thank you very
4 much for a very thorough presentation. I did
5 have a question about subgroups and whether or
6 not we would be receiving information, for
7 example, about students with disabilities and
8 things like that?
9 MR. ALONSO: You have that already.
10 COMMISSIONER STONE: We do?
11 MR. ALONSO: Yes. It was part of the
12 first deck that was sent to the Board.
13 COMMISSIONER STONE: Okay. Thank you.
14 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: We'll next move from
15 our CEO remarks to public comment for the
16 evening. We do not have any organizational
17 public comments but we do have a singular general
18 public comment and that would be from Ms.
19 Truhardt.
20 Again, public comment being for the
21 purpose of providing testimony before this Board
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
56/172
56
1 with an allotment of three minutes for
2 presentation. Whenever you are set.
3 MS. TRUHARDT: Thank you. I love
4 having the opportunity to address my government
5 because I have a lot of questions. Thank you for
6 the presentation, Dr. Alonso. I think that was
7 important.
8 But, what you didn't tell us is how
9 those outcomes are going to translate into
10 changes within the business model that you have
11 here. I think that part of the conversation is
12 important as well. So, I look forward to that.
13 In terms of the 4,000 chronic absent
14 students that we have, I think that is really a
15 challenge. As you said. I hope to be hearing
16 how we get them back into the classroom.
17 The other point you made about
18 suspensions is critically important. Children
19 have to be in the classroom to learn and we've
20 said that on numerous occasions. So, if that has
21 not filtered down throughout your organization, I
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
57/172
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
58/172
58
1 the scientific world. So, for you to decide to
2 award a contract to Cricket to put cell
3 technology on top of a school building, I think,
4 is a bad choice.
5 So, I'm asking you to vote not to award
6 that contract. The $29,000 that you get from
7 that is not worth risking our children's
8 opportunities and their future.
9 As far as I'm concerned, it's a really
10 easy choice. Those three schools where those
11 cell towers are about to be installed are in the
12 bottom fifth of achievement. So, I expect you
13 are going to do everything to eliminate any
14 barriers or problems that could be hindering the
15 learning. So, putting a cell tower on a school,
16 and it's already there so I don't understand
17 this. Take it down. If I've got to go take it
18 down, I'll go take it down. Right now, at this
19 point, it's wrong. Thank you.
20 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Thank you, Ms.
21 Truhardt. Questions, comments or observations
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
59/172
59
1 from the Board regarding the testimony? If not,
2 thank you. You'll obviously be here for
3 deliberation for that particular Procurement
4 item. In fact, we now turn to the action items
5 for the evening.
6 First, we'll start off with appeals and
7 hearings. One item that was pulled from the
8 Consent Agenda was 6.11, I believe. Case number
9 1112-158066.
10 MS. TURNER: Good evening, Mr. Chair
11 and Dr. Alonso and members of the Board. In case
12 matter referenced as 6.11, it is the
13 recommendation of the Hearing Officer to modify
14 the discipline to a 30-day suspension and
15 assessment for needs for services as set forth in
16 the report.
17 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Questions that would
18 be permissible without getting into the substance
19 or the confidentiality of the individual?
20 Questions? No?
21 With that said, we'll entertain a
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
60/172
60
1 motion for the approval of the Hearing Examiner's
2 recommendation for modification of the expulsion
3 to a 30-day school suspension. Is there support
4 for such a motion? Hearing none, we'll entertain
5 a motion for modification of the recommendation.
6 COMMISSIONER STONE: I'd like to move
7 that we reject the Hearing Officer's
8 recommendation and accept the decision of the
9 CEO.
10 MS. TURNER: That would be correct with
11 the caveat that the Board has discussed the
12 reasons for the rejection of the Hearing
13 Officer's recommendation pursuant to its quasi-
14 judicial role in closed session. And, that is
15 reflected in the minutes.
16 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Fair enough. We
17 have a motion. Is there a second in support of
18 the motion?
19 VOICE: (Inaudible. Speaking away from
20 microphone.)
21 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Okay. With that
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
61/172
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
62/172
62
1 7.1. I'll ask my fellow Board members to remind
2 me. We'll remove that and circle back around.
3 Oh, nevermind. We're back on track.
4 Item 7.01. Narrative, Cornerstone, A
5 Bright Idea and Media II, print design and
6 interactive media services requirements contract.
7 To approve a competitively solicited requirements
8 contract with three firms, Cornerstone, A Bright
9 Idea and Media II. The estimated annual amount
10 is $1 million. The contract is to provide print
11 design and interactive media services vetted
12 through the Engagement Office. Each job
13 requested within the contract is priced
14 individually. The three-year contract period is
15 July 25, 2012 through July 24, 2015. Questions?
16 COMMISSIONER HECK: Thank you. Define
17 for me the contract. Providing print design and
18 interactive media services for whom? For the
19 system? For the community? And, how does that
20 supplement or add onto systems that we already
21 have and that we're paying a lot of money for?
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
63/172
63
1 MR. SARBANES: This requirements
2 contract gets largely to the printed materials
3 that we do. All the back-to-school materials and
4 those kinds of things. We've had this in place,
5 this is the second time we've done the
6 requirements contract. It's for really
7 departments, sometimes schools, but departments
8 throughout the district. This is mostly focused
9 on publications. This isn't like the phone
10 service or other things like that.
11 COMMISSIONER HECK: Are these new
12 vendors or continued vendors for requirements?
13 MR. SARBANES: Two are continued, one
14 is a new one.
15 COMMISSIONER HECK: All right. So,
16 it's many of the publications that go to parents?
17 MR. SARBANES: Yes. That's the bulk of
18 it.
19 COMMISSIONER HECK: Okay. I appreciate
20 the clarification because it really wasn't clear,
21 from the description I read, exactly what it was
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
64/172
64
1 for. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The
2 calendars that go home at the beginning of the
3 year. The handbooks that go home. The
4 publications around the FARMS campaign.
5 Attendance things. There's a whole range of
6 publications that go home that are included in
7 there.
8 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Other questions,
9 comments or otherwise? If not, we can call for a
10 motion with respect to item 7.01. Is there a
11 motion for approval?
12 COMMISSIONER HECK: So moved.
13 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: By Commissioner
14 Heck.
15 COMMISSIONER FRANCOIS: Second.
16 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: By Commissioner
17 Francois. All those in favor, signify by saying
18 aye.
19 SPEAKERS: Aye.
20 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: All those opposed?
21 Abstentions or recusals? Motion carries with
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
65/172
65
1 respect to item 7.01. Item 8.01. The narrative,
2 the Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and
3 Learning at the University of Virginia. A
4 contract with the Center for Advanced Study of
5 Teaching and Learning at the University of
6 Virginia, this group will provide services to
7 city schools for the purposes of consultation,
8 support, implementation and evaluation of
9 Capturing Your Classroom, A Learning Experience.
10 The project cycle is an innovative
11 video capture and coaching process that will
12 allow teachers to receive structured feedback and
13 view their classroom instruction. Contract term
14 is July 25, 2012 through July 24, 2015.
15 Questions? Commissioner Heck?
16 COMMISSIONER HECK: Thank you. I'm not
17 clear from the information I received. Is there
18 a monetary value to this? Is this a grant? I
19 don't see any monetary value to it. The contract
20 term is one year but for how much?
21 MR. PARKER: The contract amount is
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
66/172
66
1 $100,000. It's funded by a Race to the Top
2 grant.
3 COMMISSIONER HECK: Okay. That was not
4 clear. So, it's an RTT grant of $100,000. Okay.
5 Dr. Santelisas, fo you feel that this kind of
6 video technique will help in terms of the
7 professional development of teachers?
8 MS. SANTELISAS: One of the early
9 trails of feedback that we've been receiving from
10 teachers is that it is providing them with an
11 opportunity to view their instruction in ways
12 they haven't before. One of the things that
13 we're doing is linking this work with a lot of
14 work that has gone on with the project with Gates
15 that has been national work around teacher
16 evaluation and improving teacher practice.
17 So, the University of Virginia has done
18 similar work that actually has a fairly extensive
19 research base with it which is what is included
20 in the procurement.
21 COMMISSIONER HECK: Do we have any
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
67/172
67
1 idea, even as a ballpark figure, how many
2 teachers this might be able to help? Is there
3 any way to know that?
4 VOICE: At this point, 14 schools have
5 opted into the project and are going to be
6 participating. At any given school, we're really
7 only looking at teachers who are in 4th through
8 8th grade math and English language arts. So, in
9 a ballpark, depending on how many teachers are
10 randomly selected from that pool of all that are
11 eligible, we're looking maybe between 50 to 70
12 teachers and about 15 to 20 mentors from those 14
13 schools. So, this is sort of a small pilot
14 implementation to see how this goes.
15 COMMISSIONER HECK: Can those videos,
16 are they proprietarily owned by the vendor? Or,
17 do we get to keep them and use them and use them
18 moving forward? So, you're spreading out the
19 cost as you are using it for PD.
20 VOICE: Yes. They will be owned by
21 Baltimore City Public Schools. Initially, when
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
68/172
68
1 they are captured, they'll be owned by the
2 teacher so that we have some protection over
3 sharing. But, they would be us and not the
4 University of Virginia.
5 COMMISSIONER HECK: I appreciate the
6 detail. Thank you.
7 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Any other questions
8 or comments? If not -
9 COMMISSIONER HECK: So moved.
10 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: By Commissioner
11 Heck.
12 COMMISSIONER FRANCOIS: Second.
13 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: A second by
14 Commissioner Francois. A question from
15 Commissioner Stone?
16 COMMISSIONER STONE: So, while I have
17 no real issue with the camera piece, is it
18 inextricably linked with the MET Project?
19 MS. SANTELISAS: No.
20 COMMISSIONER STONE: In other words, we
21 can do whatever we wanted with it but we've
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
69/172
69
1 chosen the MET Project.
2 MS. SANTELISAS: Well, no. I should
3 publicly clarify. I referenced the MET Project
4 because, nationally, they've been doing work with
5 a number of districts particularly linked to
6 teacher evaluation.
7 We went with the University of Virginia
8 because a lot of theirs has been related to
9 teacher development. So, my reference point to
10 the MET Project was more to give the Board a
11 national context.
12 COMMISSIONER STONE: So, there is no
13 relationship between this?
14 MS. SANTELISAS: No.
15 COMMISSIONER STONE: Well, that
16 certainly strengthens my support of it.
17 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: With that said, we
18 have a motion by Commissioner Heck and a second
19 by Commissioner Francois. Are there other
20 questions? If not, all those in favor of the
21 approval of the motion, signify by saying aye.
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
70/172
70
1 SPEAKERS: Aye.
2 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: All those opposed?
3 Abstentions or recusals? Item 8.01 thus passes.
4 Next on the Procurement action item list will be
5 8.06, International Baccalaureate Organization.
6 To increase the estimated annual amount of the
7 IBO contract by $100,000 in order to accommodate
8 participation in the IB middle years program.
9 The annual fee for middle school can be as much
10 as $20,000 depending on the number of subjects
11 and the number of students involved in the
12 program. On January 10, 2012, the Board approved
13 a three-year contract with the IBO to provide
14 services solely to City College. Contract term
15 is September 1, 2011 through August 31, 2014.
16 Year One of the contract was $65,000. Questions?
17 Commissioner Heck?
18 COMMISSIONER HECK: Thank you. Okay.
19 We're going to accommodate participation in the
20 middle year program with this procurement. Is
21 that correct?
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
71/172
71
1 MS. SANTELISAS: Yes.
2 COMMISSIONER HECK: Do we know what
3 schools it will be?
4 MS. SANTELISAS: Yes. We have a
5 process whereby we will identify up to two
6 schools a year. The district will support those
7 schools for a particular number of years in the
8 early stages. A great example, I guess the most
9 recent example is Mount Washington
10 Elementary/Middle submitted their proposal to
11 become an IB middle years program and we are
12 supporting them currently. Thomas Jefferson
13 Elementary/Middle who had an elementary IB
14 program also applied internal to the district and
15 is expanding their IB program from elementary to
16 middle grades.
17 This coming school year, by January, we
18 will have identified what additional two schools
19 will be selected for the middle years program.
20 COMMISSIONER HECK: So, does this mean,
21 like in the high school IB program, the middle
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
72/172
72
1 schooler, when they are promoted to the 9th
2 grade, do they get a certificate? An IB middle
3 school certificate?
4 MS. SANTELISAS: No. Actually, the IB
5 program varies significantly within the middle
6 grades years to what's more commonly known as the
7 program that occurs in high school.
8 So, that middle years programming, the
9 reason why there are a number of middle schools
10 that are interested in it is it's a way to have
11 all students, unlike the diploma program where
12 students self-select which track, either
13 certificate or diploma. The middle years
14 programming is designed to target the entire
15 middle school population.
16 COMMISSIONER HECK: Really. Okay.
17 That was my interest. Because, there are some
18 questions about the effectiveness of the IB
19 program on the high school level. Is that a fair
20 statement?
21 MS. SANTELISAS: Well, I won't say and
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
73/172
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
74/172
74
1 MS. SANTELISAS: Yes.
2 COMMISSIONER HECK: A six-fold
3 increase. See, I studied math because I sit next
4 to Commissioner Francois. So, I did not hear
5 about that. That is very encouraging.
6 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Hence our slight
7 bump in math this year.
8 COMMISSIONER STONE: Thank you. I
9 recall in January when we had this discussion,
10 that was the concern and that's most of my
11 question.
12 I don't understand, and I think that's
13 great, by the way. That we were able to do that.
14 That was something that the Board had discussed.
15 So, thank you.
16 The other thing is, when you came to us
17 in January, that money was for school year?
18 MS. SANTELISAS: It was to cover, I
19 believe, September 1, 2011 to 2014. But, what
20 we're asking for now is an increase to cover the
21 additional middle years expenses.
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
75/172
75
1 COMMISSIONER STONE: So, we are
2 expanding the number of students?
3 MS. SANTELISAS: Yes. And, the number
4 of schools.
5 COMMISSIONER STONE: I mean the number
6 of schools, as opposed to we underestimated what
7 it would cost.
8 MS. SANTELISAS: That's right.
9 COMMISSIONER STONE: Okay. Great.
10 Thank you.
11 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Commissioner Hike-
12 Hubbard?
13 COMMISSIONER HUBBARD: Just a
14 clarification point. When you started speaking,
15 you said that we are sort of helping schools
16 pilot this in their first year, will we continue
17 to fund this? I know with City College, we are
18 continuing to fund that year after year and it's
19 a commitment that the Board has made to support
20 an IB program as an offering of a big portfolio
21 of options for our students.
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
76/172
76
1 So, I'm just asking what is the
2 continued support for middle schools that we're
3 going to be asked to do or is it more about
4 expanding to the other schools?
5 MS. SANTELISAS: That's a great
6 question. The way we've designed the funding
7 moving forward is that we'll provide accepted
8 middle grades schools that want to implement IB
9 middle years programming and we'll support them
10 on a gradually decreasing basis over a three-year
11 period. We were very committed to that during
12 the discussions with the CEO. We wanted to
13 support schools in getting them started because
14 we believe in International Baccalaureate. But,
15 the schools would have to plan accordingly for
16 that expense as part of their ongoing commitment
17 and support of the program.
18 COMMISSIONER HUBBARD: Just to clarify,
19 that means that schools are actually paying for
20 the continued support themselves? Or, is it
21 after three years, they have the capacity to
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
77/172
77
1 operate the program without the extra support?
2 MS. SANTELISAS: A combination of both.
3 For example, a part of why we're continuing the
4 support at the high school level is because of
5 the expense of exams at the high school level
6 even after initial professional development for
7 teachers is completed and initial curriculum
8 alignment has happened.
9 One of the heaviest ongoing costs for
10 IB is actual scoring of assessments because they
11 are all hand-scored by two to three individuals.
12 So, on that note, we will continue our support of
13 IB at the high school level. But, what we have
14 said to all schools is that you have to plan for
15 how to support this effort ongoing knowing that
16 the district will support initial investments in
17 teacher professional development and initial
18 application to become IB certified.
19 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Commissioner Stone?
20 COMMISSIONER STONE: I'm glad you asked
21 that question because, although that's not a
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
78/172
78
1 discussion for right now, that's under the
2 current way that we fund schools. That it would
3 be a diminishing tier.
4 However, we could choose, if we decided
5 to centrally fund programs like that, just like
6 we do for many alternative programs throughout
7 the system that don't have diminishing revenues,
8 whether it be legally mandated or otherwise, so
9 it doesn't have to be that way. It's just how it
10 is. I hope that we will have that discussion as
11 the budget approaches.
12 MS. SANTELISAS: Certainly.
13 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Other questions or
14 comments? If not, we can entertain a motion with
15 respect to 8.06.
16 COMMISSIONER HUBBARD: So moved.
17 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: By Commissioner
18 Hike-Hubbard.
19 COMMISSIONER STONE: Second.
20 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: A second by
21 Commissioner Stone. All those in favor, signify
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
79/172
79
1 by saying aye.
2 SPEAKERS: Aye.
3 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: All those opposed?
4 Abstentions or recusals? Item 8.06 thus passes.
5 Next is 8.08, the Success For All Foundation.
6 The contract with Success For All in the total
7 amount of $60,000 per participating school to
8 provide the Success For All reading intervention
9 program. Contract term is August 1, 2012 to July
10 30, 2015. This was removed from Consent by
11 necessity of a recusal. For the sake of full
12 disclosure, they were a client of my firm at
13 least as recently as 2004. They may still be on
14 the books. My necessity of a recusal takes this
15 out of Consent.
16 Are there questions? If not, we'll
17 entertain a motion for approval.
18 COMMISSIONER HECK: So moved.
19 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: By Commissioner
20 Heck.
21 COMMISSIONER HUBBARD: Second.
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
80/172
80
1 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: A second by
2 Commissioner Hike-Hubbard. All those in favor,
3 signify by saying aye.
4 SPEAKERS: Aye.
5 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: All those opposed?
6 Abstentions? Recusals? Two recusals, one
7 opposition, that takes three out of the picture.
8 So, do we have four? Just in polling, the poll
9 was in favor of approval. Commissioner Hike-
10 Hubbard, Commissioner Akchin, Commissioner
11 Francois and Commissioner Heck. There was one
12 opposition, Commissioner Stone. There were two
13 recusals, myself and Commissioner Wood. So, we
14 haven't gotten to five yet.
15 MR. ALONSO: So, we'll have to re-
16 approach it with Marnell here.
17 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: We've re-polled for
18 the sake of new math. We are at the requisite
19 five. Just for the sake of the record, the five
20 would be Commissioners Heck, Francois, Stone,
21 Akchin and Hike-Hubbard. There are two recusals,
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
81/172
81
1 myself and Commissioner Wood. Item 8.08 thus
2 passes.
3 Next on Procurement is 9.03, Notables
4 LLC, Breakfast Packs for School. To approve a
5 competitively bid requirements contract with
6 Notables LLC to provide breakfast packs to city
7 schools in the estimated annual amount of
8 $600,000. The period of performance is July 1,
9 2012 through June 30, 2015. Questions?
10 Commissioner Heck.
11 COMMISSIONER HECK: Thank you. Just so
12 that the public understands, the breakfast packs
13 for schools, are these the pre-packaged, in a
14 box, nutritious breakfasts containing cereals, a
15 health bar and a fruit juice?
16 MR. PARKER: Yes, sir.
17 COMMISSIONER HECK: The concept was
18 originally brought by Tony Geraci?
19 MR. PARKER: Correct.
20 COMMISSIONER HECK: So, I just want to
21 make sure that's what that is. The kids can
-
7/31/2019 Baltimore City Board of Education 7 24 2012 Board Minutes
82/172
82
1 actually eat these in their classroom while
2 instruction is taking place.
3 MR. PARKER: Exactly.
4 COMMISSIONER HECK: Thank you for the
5 clarification. That's all I needed to know.
6 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: Questions? Now we
7 can entertain a motion with respect to approval
8 of 9.03.
9 COMMISSIONER HECK: So moved.
10 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: By Commissioner
11 Heck.
12 COMMISSIONER FRANCOIS: Second.
13 BOARD CHAIR DUKE: A second by
14 Commission