BABA Thesisevaluationform

2
8/11/2019 BABA Thesisevaluationform http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/baba-thesisevaluationform 1/2 UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS Faculty of Business Economics Business Degee Pogammes in Englis! Bac!elo of "ts #onos in Business "$ministation THESIS REPORT Candidate’s name: Title of thesis: Examiner's name: Type of thesis: a) mostly theoretical b) mostly empirical Criteria for Evaluation Scale of points Points given 1.Topic qualit !originalit and relevance:" #$1% points a. Does not address a problem at all 0 point b. Topic only marginally relevant, aims and objectives not addressed at all 1-4 points c. elevant topic b!t not addressed properly "-# points d. elevant topic, aims and objectives addressed properly $-1% points %. &iterature surve #$ points a. &o literat!re s!rvey, no theoretical basis 0 point b. 'ome literat!re s!rvey b!t relevant literat!re missing, poor interpretation 1-( points c. easonable literat!re s!rvey b!t some relevant literat!re missing, partially inappropriate interpretation 4- points d. Thoro!gh and e*tensive literat!re s!rvey +ith appropriate interpretation, a range of vie+s presented -# points (. Theoretical aspect Empirical aspect (.a. Choice and description of research method: (.). *ethod of data collection+ validit of sample: #$1% points a. &o clear description of research method a. &o clear description of method of data collection 0 point b. Description only partially correct, important aspects missing b . Data collection not clearly organised, no clear sampling 1-4 points c. lear description b!t some aspects are missing c. 'ampling and data collection only partly acceptable "-# points d. lear and thoro!gh description +ith all important aspects incl!ded d. 'ystematic data collection, sampling acceptable $-1% points ,.a. -pplication of research method: ,. ). epth of data analsi s: #$ points a. ne-sided !se of research method, relevant literat!re missing a. /asic methods !sed only: percentage calc!lation, fre!ency, etc. 0-4 points b. lternative +ays sho+n, b!t some aspects missing b. range of methods !sed: correlation and hypothesis analysis, etc. "-# points

Transcript of BABA Thesisevaluationform

Page 1: BABA Thesisevaluationform

8/11/2019 BABA Thesisevaluationform

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/baba-thesisevaluationform 1/2

UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS

Faculty of Business EconomicsBusiness Deg ee P og ammes in Englis!

Bac!elo of " ts #ono s in Business "$minist ation

THESIS REPORT

Candidate’s name:

Title of thesis:

Examiner's name:

Type of thesis: a) mostly theoretical b) mostly empirical

Criteria for Evaluation Scale ofpoints

Points given

1.Topic qualit !originalit and relevance:" #$1% points

a. Does not address a problem at all 0 point b. Topic only marginally relevant, aims and objectives notaddressed at all

1-4 points

c. elevant topic b!t not addressed properly "-# pointsd. elevant topic, aims and objectives addressed properly $-1% points%. &iterature surve #$ pointsa. &o literat!re s!rvey, no theoretical basis 0 point

b. 'ome literat!re s!rvey b!t relevant literat!re missing, poorinterpretation

1-( points

c. easonable literat!re s!rvey b!t some relevant literat!re missing, partially inappropriate interpretation

4- points

d. Thoro!gh and e*tensive literat!re s!rvey +ith appropriateinterpretation, a range of vie+s presented

-# points

(. Theoretical aspect Empirical aspect(.a. Choice and description of research method:

(.). *ethod of data collection+validit of sample:

#$1% points

a. &o clear description of research method

a. &o clear description of methodof data collection

0 point

b. Description only partiallycorrect, important aspectsmissing

b. Data collection not clearlyorganised, no clear sampling

1-4 points

c. lear description b!t someaspects are missing c. 'ampling and data collectiononly partly acceptable "-# points

d. lear and thoro!ghdescription +ith all importantaspects incl!ded

d. 'ystematic data collection,sampling acceptable

$-1% points

,.a. -pplication of researchmethod:

,.). epth of data anal sis: #$ points

a. ne-sided !se of researchmethod, relevant literat!remissing

a. /asic methods !sed only: percentage calc!lation,fre !ency, etc.

0-4 points

b. lternative +ays sho+n, b!tsome aspects missing

b. range of methods !sed:correlation and hypothesisanalysis, etc.

"-# points

Page 2: BABA Thesisevaluationform

8/11/2019 BABA Thesisevaluationform

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/baba-thesisevaluationform 2/2

c. ritical overvie+ given in acoherent +ay

c. 2ore sophisticated methodsare also !tilised: correlation andhypotheses analysis, etc.

-# points

/. Presentation and discussion of research findings and practicalimplementations

#$1 points

a. 3oor presentation and disc!ssion, no practical relevance and orrecommended implementation plan

0 point

b. 'ome evidence of presentation or disc!ssion s5ills b!t eval!ationlac5s depth, some practical relevance and or implementation plan

1- points

c. 6ood presentation and disc!ssion , practical relevance andimplementation plan offered b!t some points missing

-1% points

d. 7igh level of presentation and disc!ssion, clear practicalrelevance, detailed and +ell-gro!nded implementation plan

1(-1# points

0. Structure of thesis #$1% pointsa. 8nclear and +ea5 str!ct!re 0 point

b. 'ome parts clear b!t thesis lac5s overall coherency 1-4 pointsc. de !ate str!ct!re b!t some parts not coherent "-# points

d. lear and coherent thro!gho!t $-1% points. 2ualit and st le of 3riting #$1# pointsa. 3oor !se of 9nglish, fre !ent grammatical mista5es, inade !ategrasp of style

0 point

b. 6enerally correct !se of vocab!lary b!t cl!msy +ording, severalgrammatical mista5es reasonable grasp of style

1-( points

c. 2ostly acc!rate 9nglish, correct choice of vocab!lary, gooda+areness of style

4- points

d. 9*cellent command of 9nglish, correct !se of register andvocab!lary

-10 points

. 4ormat+ citation and referencing+ )i)liograph and

appendix 5 appendices

#$1# points

a. ne or all of the follo+ing missing: citations and references inthe te*t, bibliography: 6thesis has to )e re7ected 3ith grade 1

;0

b. /ibliography present b!t not all references indicated in it appendi* appendices inappropriate or even inade !ate

1-4 points

c. /ibliography present, incl!des all references b!t appendi* appendices not clear or even partially inacc!rate

"-# points

b. ll references in the te*t appear in the bibliography, +ell-str!ct!red and +ell-presented appendi* appendices

$-10 points

8. 9verall opinion #$1# points3lease indicate yo!r overall opinion of thesis on a 10-point scale,+here 10 means <e*cellent= and 1 means <very poor=.Total points #$1##

points

rading scale : 0-"0 fail >1), "1- ( pass >%), 4- 4 fair >(), "-# good >4), ##-100 e*cellent>")

;emar<s !if the grade is fair or )elo3 remar<s are compulsor ":

2uestions for oral defence of thesis :1.

%.

3?cs, @@@@@@@@@@@@.. 9*aminerAs signat!re