B Production and Decay at D Ø

29
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3

description

B Production and Decay at D Ø. Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3. B physics at D Ø. Will be presenting latest results on: D** B** B s  m + m -  (1S) production X(3872) Keys to D Ø B physics program Muon system and trigger - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of B Production and Decay at D Ø

Page 1: B Production and Decay at D Ø

B Production and Decay at DØ

Brad Abbott

University of Oklahoma

BEACH 2004

June 28-July 3

Page 2: B Production and Decay at D Ø

B physics at DØ• Will be presenting latest results on:

– D**

– B**

– Bs

(1S) production

– X(3872)

• Keys to DØ B physics program– Muon system and trigger

– Silicon vertex detector and fiber tracker

L= 115 – 250 pb-1

Page 3: B Production and Decay at D Ø

SMTSMT

SMT

Muon System and Tracker • New forward muon system with ||<2 and good shielding • 4-layer Silicon and 8 doublet-layer Fiber Trackers in 2 T

magnetic field

Page 4: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Observation of B D** X

• D** are orbitally excited D meson states

• In heavy quark limit– Two narrow states (D-wave)

– Two broad states(S-wave)

• Search for narrow states via– D0

1(2420) D*+ -

– D*02(2460) D*+ -

Page 5: B Production and Decay at D Ø

D0 sample

• D10 and D2*0 observed in

several experiments, most recently by BaBar/Belle in B- D**0 -

• DØ is studying D10 and

D2*0 in B semileptonic

decays

• Start with B D0 X (D0 K)

Page 6: B Production and Decay at D Ø

D* sample

• Add a pion (charge correlated with the muon) with PT>0.18 GeV

Page 7: B Production and Decay at D Ø

D**

• Measure invariant mass of D*- + system

• See merged D10(2420)

and D2*0 (2460)

Wrong sign combinations

Page 8: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Interference effectsTwo interfering Breit-Wigner D** states with mass/width as measured by Belle (no resolution effects included)

Work in progress to extract separate amplitude for eachstate and relative phase of interference.

Page 9: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Branching ratio• Take experimentally measured number of D1

0 and D2*0 : N(D1)+N(D2*)=523 40

• Measure branching ratio of B D**(narrow) X, normalizing to known branching ratio (B D*+ X)

• Br(B {D10,D2*0} X • Br({D1

0,D2*0} D*+ -) = 0.280 0.021(stat) ± 0.088 (sys) %

• Compare to LEP measurement of total D** Br (B D*+ X) = (0.48 0.10)%

• ~ half the rate through narrow states

Page 10: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Future measurements

= 0.4-0.7 predicted by HQET

World average =0.4 ± 0.15

DØ can measure:• R• Br(B D1X )• Br(B D*2 X)• Interference effects• Helicity

Page 11: B Production and Decay at D Ø

B**

• Heavy quark symmetry predicts 4 B*J states JP = 0+, 1+ , 1+ , 2+

• Parity and angular momentum require B*J to decay to B* or B

• B** provide a good test of heavy quark symmetry• Many properties of the B** unknown• Large B cross section at Tevatron allows for

precise measurements with large statistics

Page 12: B Production and Decay at D Ø

B**

• Search for B**d B+ -

B+ J/ K+ • Allows one to charge

correlate the pion and the B to reduce combinatoric background

115 pb-1

PDG Average 5.698 0.008 GeV

Page 13: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Additional Channels

• Are adding in more decays to increase statistics

• B**+ Bd

– Bd J/ K*

– Bd J/ KS

• With increased statistics should be able to resolve the narrow B** states.

Page 14: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Bd,s

• Forbidden at

Tree Level in SM

BR(Bd l+l-) BR(Bs l+l-)

e (3.4 ± 2.3) 10-15 (8.0 ± 3.5) 10-14

(1.5 ± 0.9) 10-10 (3.4 ± 0.5) 10-9

(3.1 ± 1.9) 10-8 (7.4 ± 1.9) 10-7

Theoretical predictions

Experimental limits at 90% CL

BR(Bd l+l-) BR(Bs l+l-)

e < 5.9 10-6 < 5.4 10-5

< 1.5 10-7 < 5.8 10-7

< 2.5 % < 5.0%

Page 15: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Bs in SUSY(Two Higgs-Doublet Model)

• BR depends only on charged Higgs mass and tan

• BR increases as tan4 (tan6) in 2HDM (MSSM)

• R parity violating models can give tree level contributions

Page 16: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Dimuon Data sample

Page 17: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Cut optimization

• Signal box is blinded

• Use a random grid search optimizing the ratio

Ba 2/

= reconstruction efficiency of signal MCB= expected background extrapolated from sidebandsa = number of sigmas corresponding to confidence level (set to 2 for this analysis, corresponding to ~ 95% CL

(Following proposal fromG. Punzi physics/0308063 Test of hypothesis and limits)

Page 18: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Discriminating variables• Isolation of the muon pair

• Opening angle between momentum vector of pair and vector pointing from primary vertex to vertex

• Decay lengthBox not opened yet180 pb-1

Page 19: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Expected upper limit

• Since box not opened, calculate expected upper limit

• Expected signal normalized to B+J/K+

• Expect 7.3 ± 1.8 background events in signal region

• Current expected limit using Feldman-Cousins:

Br(Bs ) < 1.0 10-6 @ 95% CL (stat + sys) Reoptimization still in progress.

Further improvements expected

Page 20: B Production and Decay at D Ø

(1S) Production• Measuring the (1S) production cross section

provides a test of our understanding of the production mechanism of heavy quarks

• Extend measurement of (1S) cross section to rapidities of 1.8

• Color octet model predicts an increase in transverse polarization with increasing PT

(Measurements so far are inconclusive)

Page 21: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Analysis• Measure the (1S) cross-section as a function

of PT in three rapidity regions

0< |y| <0.6 0.6<|y|<1.2 1.2<|y|<1.8

Signal fit to 3 Gaussians (1S), (2S), (3S) Background: 3rd order polynomial

m((2/3S) = m((1S) + mpdg((2/3S)- (1S))((2/3S) = ((1S) + m (2/3S)/m((1S))* ((1S))

5 parameters: m, (1S)Number of (1S), (2S), (3S)

Page 22: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Normalized cross section

159 pb-1

Page 23: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Normalized Cross section

Page 24: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Normalized cross section

• Normalized cross section shows little dependence on rapidity

• Good agreement with published results

• Absolute cross section nearly ready

• Next: Polarization measurement

Page 25: B Production and Decay at D Ø

X(3872) J/ + -

• First observed by Belle B+ K+ X(3872) decays• Signal confirmed by CDF, DØ and BaBar• Nature of X(3872) unknown• Theories include:

– Another charmonium state– D D* molecular state

• Since the X(3872) lies very close in mass to the Ψ(2S) charmonium state, and has a common decay mode (X J/, we compare production and decay properties of these two states through this decay mode

Page 26: B Production and Decay at D Ø

X(3872)

M=774.9 ± 3.1 (stat) 3.0 (sys) MeV

522 ± 100 X candidates

Significance = 5.2

230 pb-1

Page 27: B Production and Decay at D Ø

• Separate data into different regions

• Compare (2S) yield to X yield in different regions

• Study production and decay characteristics

Page 28: B Production and Decay at D Ø

• a) PT > 15 GeV• b) |y| <1• c) |cos()| < 0.4• d) decay length < 0.01 cm• e) isolation=1• f) |cos ()| < 0.4

(: boost one of the pions and the X(3872) into dipion rest frame.

is the angle between them)

• To within uncertainties, production of X(3872) found to be consistent with the production of the Y(2S) I.e producted both directy and via B decays,

• Future: look for radiative decays and charge analog of X

Compare2||))3872((

1||))3872((

yXN

yXN

2||))2((

1||))2((

ySN

ySN

Submitted to PRL: hep-ex/0405004

Page 29: B Production and Decay at D Ø

Summary

• Observation of B D** X

• Observation of B**

• Sensitivity to Bs

• Normalized Upsilon(1S) Cross section

• Observation of X(3872)

• Many new analyses on the way