B Factory Results and Prospects
description
Transcript of B Factory Results and Prospects
B Factory Results and B Factory Results and ProspectsProspectsJames D. Olsen
Princeton University(on behalf of BaBar and Belle)
Workshop on the Interplay Between Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavo(u)r PhysicsCollider and Flavo(u)r Physics
CERN, December 3-4, 2007
Outline:
• a few words on CKM
• b → s(g, , l+l-)
• b → d(g, )
• rare decays and D mixing
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 2James D. Olsen
Status of the B FactoriesStatus of the B Factories
1fb477
1752fb
Expected by summer 2008:L(Belle) = 1ab-1, L(BaBar) = 0.750ab-1
Most analyses use ~490fb-1(Belle) or ~350fb-1(BaBar), so expect effective doubling of total dataset by next summer
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 3James D. Olsen
Impact of the B Factories and Impact of the B Factories and TevatronTevatron
1998
Enormous progress in the past decade has led to a paradigm change: Use precision CKM measurements to search for New
Physics (NP)
20072007
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 4James D. Olsen
Over-constraining CP ViolationOver-constraining CP Violation
Angles only
No Angles
026.0365.0
037.0172.0
021.0332.0
038.0120.0
Errors dominated by statistics
Errors dominated by systematics (thy+exp)
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 5James D. Olsen
Status and Prospects for Status and Prospects for
891 687
BaBarPreliminary
@68%CL
B0 → (0
2.09.04.0
2.09.05.0
05.014.070.0
10)17.029.084.0(
00
00
6
L
L
L
C
S
f
B
First time-dependent CPV measurment in B0 →
Final B Factory errors: S ~ 0.50
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 6James D. Olsen
Measuring Measuring
*cbcdVV
*tbtdVV*
ubudVV
nsuppressiocolor 3 uA3cA
)()(
)()(
DKBDKB
DKBDKBACP
For illustration only
Combine all Combine all measurements!measurements!
Method Modes Adv. Disadv.
GLW D0(CP±) Constraints
Low stats, small interf.
ADS D0(K) Large interf.
Low stats
GGSZD0(Kshh)
Dalitz
Large stats,
Dalitz info
Dalitz model
sinsinBrCLEO-c can help!
Can also measure sin(2) in tdcpv B0 → DX decays
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 7James D. Olsen
Status and Prospects for Status and Prospects for
)( 20.002.0
)( 14.0
1211 41 92
*KDr
DKr
B
B
Belle data using B → DK, D*K, and D*K* with 357fb-1:
)( 56.0
)( 12.018.0
)( 07.016.0
93 53
**24.018.0
*
1518
KD
KD
DKrB
Depending on rB, can get to stat ~ 8o – 14o with full dataset
208fb-1
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 8James D. Olsen
Searching for New Physics in b → s:
b → sg, b → s, b → sl+l-
Constraints from Bs mixing
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 9James D. Olsen
eff2sin
CP Violation in b CP Violation in b → sg→ sgSummer 2008
qsqbS allfor 2sin
: ModelStandard theIn
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
2sin2sin eff
assuming same central value →
Interpretation limited by hadronic
uncertainties
Assuming no change in central values by
summer 2008, still two modes with > 3
discrepancy
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 10James D. Olsen
BR and ABR and Acpcp in b in b →→ ss
I) Fully inclusive (hadronic or leptonic tag)II) semi-inclusive (sum of exclusive modes)
Analysis techniques:
dsbBF 3 s.f. exp2435510)( 910
6
9.15.8140
81
81
L(fb-1)
Updated analyses from BaBar using > 300fb-1 are coming!
%7.34.0)( sbACP
• BF is systematics limited, fighting to < 5% difficult but not impossible• Acp (too! statistics limited (“forever”), should scale with lumi
after subtraction
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 11James D. Olsen
CP Violation in BCP Violation in B00 →→ (K(KSS00))
L, R interference!
)cos()sin(
])([])([
])([])([0000
0000
tmCtmS
KBKB
KBKBA
SS
SSCP
SM spin-flip penalty: S ms/mb*sin2
Ball and Zwicky Phys.Lett.B642:478-486,2006
• measurements statistics dominated (forever); expected final B Factory error ~0.17
• alternative analysis measuring photon helicity directly in B → K possible, but VERY difficult
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 12James D. Olsen
NP in FCNC: B NP in FCNC: B → K→ K(*)(*)llllHistorical example of interference and a new particle (Z0):
Modern opportunity in B → K(*)l+l- :
Observation of Z0 in UA1
(July 1983)-Z0 interference in e+e-
with s = 34.6GeV at DESY
(June 1982)
+?
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 13James D. Olsen
Results and Prospects for Results and Prospects for BBKK(*)(*)llllM. Nakao LP07
M. Nakao LP07
• BFs consistent with predictions
• AFB inconsistent with C9/C10 sign flip
• some “tension” (2) with SM @ low-q2
350fb-1
208fb-1
B Factory dataset will triple in these modes by summer 2008(more data → more bins!)
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 14James D. Olsen
Searching for New Physics in b → d:
b → dg, b → d
Constraints from Bd mixing
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 15James D. Olsen
CP Violation in BCP Violation in B0 0 → → KK00KK00
K0
K0
s
s
d
Final error from the B Factories ~ 0.36
15.0)SM(17.0
13.0)SM(02.0
KK
KK
C
S
Weak phases from mixing and decay cancel if top dominates:
Fleischer and Recksiegel, Eur.Phys.J.C38:251-259,2004
SM
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 16James D. Olsen
CP Violation in B CP Violation in B → →
Weak phase ~cancels plus spin-flip penalty (md/mb) → we really expect ~0!
Ball, Jones, and Zwicky Phys.Rev.D75:054004,2007
Measured by Belle (600fb-1):19.049.044.0
18.065.083.0
AC
S
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 17James D. Olsen
VVtdtd/V/Vts ts from b from b (s,d) (s,d)
/K* → |Vtd/Vts| = 0.200 ± 0.021 (exp) ± 0.015 (thy)mixing → |Vtd/Vts| = 0.2060 ± 0.0007 (exp) ± 0.0081 (thy)
Observation of B by Belle and BaBar allows a complementary
constraint on Vtd/Vts
BF x 106 Belle (386MBB) BaBar (347MBB)
B → ( (5.9) (6.4)0.110.20 13.1 0.08 25.1 25.024.0
*cbcdVV
*tbtdVV*
ubudVV
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 18James D. Olsen
New Physics in Rare Decays
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 19James D. Olsen
Searching for NP in B Searching for NP in B → →
Analysis techniques:
hadronic or leptonic tag
4104.06.1~ :SM
Difficult analysis:
• leptonic or hadronic tag (low )
• at least two neutrinos
• bkgs in Eextra difficult to model
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 20James D. Olsen
Results and Prospects for B Results and Prospects for B → →
4104.06.1~ :SM BaBar (350fb-1):
4
41.00.9-
4
102.03.04.02.1
102.04.0 8.1)(
101.06.09.0)(
BBF
BBF
BBF
446.0 56.051.0 49.0 1022.079.1)(
BBF
Belle hadronic tag (414fb-
1):
(leptonic)
(hadronic)
(combined)
World Average:
443.042.0 10 41.1)(
BBF
Final B Factory error ~ 0.28, but could do better with new tracking improvements from BaBar and leptonic tag analysis from Belle
M. Nakao LP07
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 21James D. Olsen
Observation of Not-Rare B Observation of Not-Rare B → → DD(*)(*)
H
Sensitive to NP as in B → (small e,masses could hide NP)
C. Chen and C. Geng, hep-ph/0608166A. Falk et al., PLB 326 145 (1994)
B0 → D*+
Accurate SM predictions:
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 22James D. Olsen
NP Prospects in B NP Prospects in B → D→ D(*)(*)
B → D sensitivity to NP
BaBar measurement
M. Tanaka hep-ph/9411405
(210fb-1)
(485fb-1)
Final B Factory error
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 23James D. Olsen
Lepton Flavor Violation in Lepton Flavor Violation in decaysdecays
-
mode
Belle BaBar
Br, 10-8 Lum. fb-
1
Br, 10-
8Lum. fb-1
<4.5 535 <6.8 232
e- <12 535 <11 232
e+ <2.4 535 <5.6 376
e+e- <2.8 535 <8.0 376
<3.4 535 <5.3 376
e- <4.3 535 <3.7 376
+ee <2.1 535 <5.8 376
e-ee <3.6 535 <4.3 376
Highly suppressed in SM!
Expected asymptotic limits:
• →< 2-3 x 10-8
• → < 2-3 x 10-8
(competitive with LHC @ 30fb-1)
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 24James D. Olsen
Status of DStatus of D00 Mixing MixingSensitivity to NP:
New @ Lepton-Photon 2007:
• BaBar lifetime ratio (3.0)
• BaBar Dalitz K0 (~2)
• CDF D → K analysis (3.2)
• still no sign of CP violation!
~5
CDF not yet included
BaBar 2007 %13.039.024.1 CPy
Workshop on the Interplay Between Collider and Flavour Physics 25James D. Olsen
Summary and OutlookSummary and Outlook The last ~decade has seen enormous progress in
the understanding of flavor physics Precision measurements of CKM parameters have
established KM as the dominant source CPV Null searches for rare/forbidden decays has significantly
reduced the phase space for NPMFV is the most likely NP scenario
B Factories will end operations in 2008 Total integrated luminosity ~ 1.7ab-1
Approximately double the current datasetMajor effort to repeat measurements on the final
datasets as soon as possible (major updates at ICHEP08) “Interplay” will continue into the LHC era
Once NP is discovered at LHC, we’ll know exactly where to look for it at Belle and Babar
The far-future belongs to LHCb and SuperB!