Auxetic structures for marine safety applications …...• Auxetic – enhanced mechanical...
Transcript of Auxetic structures for marine safety applications …...• Auxetic – enhanced mechanical...
28th March 2018 The Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology (IMarEST)
Auxetic structures for marine safety applications(rope, sandwich panel)
Nadimul Faisal, Abbi McLeod, Findlay Booth, Lindsay Scott, Scott Duncan, Ghazi Droubi
School of Engineering, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
Contents
1. Introduction (condition monitoring research group)
2. Background (recent examples & motivations)
3. Safety in marine structures
4. Safety practices
5. Auxetic structure design (three examples: anchor, panel)
6. Summary
© School of Engineering, Robert Gordon UniversityAuxetic structures for marine safety applications 2
Condition Monitoring Research Group (CMRG)
The research at the Condition Monitoring (CM)covers a wide range of field, including:• Condition monitoring of engines, corrosion,
vibration, thermal spraying, fracture, crack propagation
• Computational fluid dynamics approach for particle monitoring (multi-phase flow)
• Sensor based instrumented mechanical testing• Micromechanics of materials, thermal spray
coatings, thin films, bonded joints, etc. • Neutron diffraction residual strain analysis
(coatings, rocks)• Fracture mechanics (mode-I, II, mixed-mode)• Auxetic structures• Analytical/numerical modelling
Iain Steel Ghazi Droubi Sha Jihan Nadimul Faisal
Academic Staff
• Dr Nadimul Faisal [Acoustic Emission,
Micromechanics, Instrumented Mechanical
Testing, Corrosion, Neutron] [group lead]
• Dr Ghazi Droubi [Acoustic Emission, Erosion and
Corrosion Management, Multiphase Modelling ]
• Prof John Steel [Acoustic Emission, Condition
Monitoring, Vibration]
• Dr Sha Jihan [Acoustic Emission, Ultrasonic
Testing]
Acoustic Emission
Laser VibrometerUltrasonic
Eddy Current
Accelerometer
Corrosion (EIS)
Main Facilities (Condition Monitoring)
Others:
Strain gauge
Force transducer
Displacement transducer
5
Background (recent examples & motivations)
• https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/16/us-navy-destroyer-collides-ship-japan
• http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-40310563
• http://abcnews.go.com/US/navy-destroyers-deadly-collision-container-ship-japan/story?id=48131357
• https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/18/world/asia/path-ship-hit-uss-fitzgerald.html
On the 17th of June 2017, a 9,000 tonne American Naval
Destroyer, the “USS Fitzgerald”, was struck in the side by a
29,000 tonnes freight carrier. The damage was severe and
resulted in several fatalities.
Recent examples (Collision)Marine Accident Investigation Branch reports; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports
• Failure of mooring line on board LNG carrier Zarga with 1 person injured; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/failure-of-mooring-line-on-board-lng-carrier-zarga-with-1-person-injured
• Collision between rigid inflatable boats Osprey and Osprey II resulting in serious injuries to 1 passenger; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-rigid-inflatable-boats-osprey-and-osprey-ii-resulting-in-serious-injuries-to-1-passenger
• Contact made by passenger ferry Uriah Heep with Hythe Pier; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/contact-made-by-passenger-ferry-uriah-heep-with-hythe-pier
• Collision between ro-ro freight ferry Petunia Seaways and historic motor launch Peggotty; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-ro-ro-freight-ferry-petunia-seaways-and-historic-motor-launch-peggotty
• Collision between pure car carrier City of Rotterdam and ro-ro freight ferry Primula Seaways; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-pure-car-carrier-city-of-rotterdam-and-ro-ro-freight-ferry-primula-seaways
• Collision between general cargo vessel Daroja and oil bunker barge Erin Wood; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-general-cargo-vessel-daroja-and-oil-bunker-barge-erin-wood
• Collision between the stern trawler Karen and a dived Royal Navy submarine; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-the-stern-trawler-karen-and-a-dived-royal-navy-submarine
• Collision between stern trawlers Good Intent and Silver Dee resulting in Silver Dee sinking; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-stern-trawlers-good-intent-and-silver-dee-resulting-in-silver-dee-sinking
• Collision between container vessel Ever Smart and oil tanker Alexandra 1; https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/collision-between-container-vessel-ever-smart-and-oil-tanker-alexandra-1 6
Recent examples (Collision, as on 31 Aug 2017)
7
Mooring system failure
• The primary objective of amooring system is to maintainvessel position, protect therisers, and prevent collision withnearby infrastructure.
• Failure types: single line failure,two line failure, or at the pointof collision or riser failure, etc.
8
Safety in marine structures
• As human errors and technical failures cannot be prevented easily,measures can be taken to reduce the probability of risk of severeharm if an accident does occur.
• By attaching highly energy absorbent sandwich structures to theoutside of the ship, it is thought that this will help prevent criticaldamage to a vessel and therefore prevent any future fatalities orexpensive structural damage to marine structures.
9
Incidents are categorised in the Port Operations Manual as follows: • Groundings
• Ships collision
• Ship contact
• Quay contact
• Rope parting
• Touching bottom
• Equipment failure
• Near miss
• Contact with port installation
• Miscellaneous
10Ref: Port Marine Safety Code\Fowey PMSC Sept 2017
Some practices (marine safety)
• Passive mountings between items of machinery and a flexible supportstructure such as rubber mounts and wire rope isolators.
• Passive mountings provides adequate isolation at high frequencies, thepassive solution loses its effectiveness at lower frequencies due to its ownnatural frequency.
• In the case of submarines, the advanced performance is required so far athigh frequencies in order to retain the stealth function. The use of activecontrol techniques can effectively cope with these problems.
• Hybrid mount (rubber mount and piezo-stack actuators) combined passive mounting devices with active technology represents a new alternative for naval ships.
11
Auxetic structures
12
• Greek terms ‘auxetikos’ and ‘auxesis’which mean “that which tends toincrease” and “increase” respectively,
• Auxetic – enhanced mechanicalproperties, negative Poisson’s ratio.
• Due to the high energy absorbingproperties they have been used forshock and sound absorbers, bodyarmour, elbow pads, and packingmaterials.
• Auxetic fibres can be used to reinforcecomposites as they resist being pulledout due to the expansion upon applyinga tensile load.
Enhanced Indentation Resistance
Conventional
Material
Auxetic
Material
Applications of materials with NPR
13
Acknowledgement: Andrew Fowlie, Joe Connell, Sean Mackenzie, Ryan Noble, Jennifer McConnachie
Example 1: Helical auxetic yarn (HAYS) – Analytical & Simulation
14
Figs. HAY model showing deformation (straight core with
helically wound wrap)
Ref: J. McAfee, N. H. Faisal, Parametric sensitivity analysis to maximise auxetic effect of polymeric
fibre based helical yarn, Composite Structures, 162, 2017, p. 1–12
15
Input parameters for models
Example 1: Helical auxetic yarn (HAYS) – Analytical & Simulation
16
Example 2: Helical auxetic yarn (HAYS) – Experimental & Analytical
17
Fig. Maximum negative instantaneous Poisson’s ratio when
varying initial wrap angle.
Fig. Experimental set-up: (a) Scotch-Weld™ epoxy structural DP190 adhesive
bonding between the rubber and the nitinol, (b) cross-section of chuck with the
bolt tightened onto the wrap, (c) tensile loading experimental layout, and (d)
using ImageJ to measure extension and lateral expansion of HAY.
Acknowledgement: Andrew Fowlie, Joe Connell, Sean Mackenzie, Ryan Noble, Jennifer McConnachie
Example 2: Helical auxetic yarn (HAYS) – Experimental & Analytical
18
Fig. Pictures with the corresponding
axial strains (experiment 1) shown here
in sequential order (a) to (l).
VIDEO
Example 2: Helical auxetic yarn (HAYS) – Experimental & Analytical
19
Fig. Set 2/Analytical
configuration: (a) predicted
effective diameter of model
1 (core: rubber, wrap:
nitinol) against HAY axial
tensile strain, and (b)
predicted Poisson's ratio for
of model 1 (core: rubber,
wrap: nitinol) throughout
the tensile process.
Fig. Set 1/Analytical configurations: (a) predicted effective
diameter of model 1 (core: rubber, wrap: nitinol) against HAY
axial strain, (b) predicted Poisson's ratio for each HAY model
throughout the tensile process, and (c) maximum NPR as the
Poisson's ratio of the core is varied.
Example 2: Helical auxetic yarn (HAYS) –Experimental & Analytical
20
Fig. Comparison of the experiments 1, 2 and 3 (three tensile
testing on HAYs), as per Set 2 analytical configuration with
rubber as core and nitinol as wrap materials: (a) load-extension
profile, and (b) calculated Poisson's ratio plotted against axial
strain throughout the tensile process.
Fig. 8. Comparison between the analytical prediction (as per Set 2 analytical
configuration with rubber as core and nitinol as wrap materials) and the average
from the three tensile experiments of HAYs.
Example 2: Helical auxetic yarn (HAYS) –Experimental & Analytical
21
(a)
Fig. (a) All three tensile tested HAYs, (b) frictional forces after the
epoxy resin failed, and (c) failure of epoxy resin from experiment 3 –
(A) area subjected to stress from the bolt in the chuck (B) remaining
part of the nitinol wire after failure.
HAY with graphene coated wrap
Potential materials (Core, Wrap) for HAY design
22
Auxetic Panels
Design and Analysis of Sandwich Auxetic StructureFor Marine Safety Applications
23
Aim & Objectives
• Modify an auxetic cell to reduce the stress concentrations within the structure.
• To fill the modified auxetic structure to achieve a greater energy absorbance to enhance safety applications.
Aims and Objectives
Introduction
• What is an Auxetic?• Negative Poisson’s Ratio (NPR)
• Expands when tensile force applied
• Contracts when compressed
Enhanced Indentation Resistance
Conventional
Material
Auxetic
Material
• Marine Accidental
Investigations (MAI)
Use of Auxetics
• Footwear – sole can expand, increasing flexibility
• Biomedical – smart bandages, dilators for opening arteries
• Impact resistance – bulletproof vests, blast curtains, armoured vehicles, IED containment
• Shock and vibration absorption properties
Use of Auxetics
• The dimensions chosen for the modified strut design were:
• θ = 60°
• t = 1mm
• l = 3.75mm
• h = 9.80mm
• S = 4.80mm
Design Parameters
Design Methodology
• Cell Optimisation:
• Cell modifications
• Analytical study
�� �
ℎ�
� �� ��
���
Calculations
• m=5,500 tonne
• V=2m/s
Force Equation(full size)
! �"
#
! �11 ∗ 10'
5
)* � +. + -.
Force Equation(scale model size)
!1
!2
�31
32
)4 � 55 6.
Energy Equation (full size)
" �1
2:;
< � 55 -=
29Basic model with steel base-plates
Finite Element Analysis (Elastic, Perfect Bonding)
Initial Simulations (MK0)
Yield Strength of Steel
Yield Strength of PP
MK1
MK2
MK3 Filling of cell rows (probes)
Basic Model – Path Analysis (Path 1)
Basic Model Elevation with Stress Paths and Row Numbers
Basic Model – Path Analysis (Path 1)
Basic Model – Path Analysis (Path 4)Basic Model - Path Analysis (Path 4)
Basic Model – Path Analysis (Path 3)Basic Model – Path Analysis (Path 3)
Filling Patterns (No Fill)Filling Patterns (No Fill)
Filling Patterns (Silly Putty Fill)Filling Patterns (Silly Putty)
Filling Patterns (PVC Fill w/ Silly Putty Row 5)Filling Patterns (PVC Rows 1-4, Silly Putty Row 5)
Filling Patterns (PVC Fill)Filling Patterns (PVC Fill)
Enhanced Model – Path Analysis (Path 1)Enhanced Model – Path Analysis (Path 4)Enhanced Model – Path Analysis (Path 3)
Energy Absorption
42
Conclusion
• Filling and filleting the auxetic structure: reduced stress concentrations and decreased energy absorption.
• Decreased stress concentration increased the structures penetration resistance.
Summary
• Possible applications for HAYs made of light-weight materials such as PEEK orPTFE could replace conventional structures have been identified.
• A maximum NPR of -12.04 was achieved by lowering the wrap starting angle. Thefindings show that a starting wrap angle of 7° will produce the highest NPR. Thisshould be the design angle for optimised performance of the yarn.
• The use of a nitinol wrap is expected to increase the maximum NPR of a HAYcompared with conventional materials such as stainless steel or carbon fibre.Materials with low coefficients of friction such as PTFE or acetal would enhancethe auxetic behaviour if used as for the core material.
• While filling the model with material reduced the stress concentration, it led to areduction in the energy absorbance. The energy absorbed by an impact is of highimportance to the structural integrity of the vessel.
44
45
Robert Gordon University
Any Questions, Comments or
Suggestions!!!
Nadimul Haque FaisalPhD, FHEA, CEng MIMechE, MIMMM
School of Engineering, Robert Gordon University
+44-1224-262438
Thank you