Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth and ...€¦ · to constrain tumor progression,...
Transcript of Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth and ...€¦ · to constrain tumor progression,...
AUGUST 2014�CANCER DISCOVERY | 905
RESEARCH BRIEF
Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth and Progression in Tumors with p53 Alterations Annan Yang 1 , N.V. Rajeshkumar 3 , Xiaoxu Wang 1 , Shinichi Yabuuchi 3 , 7 , Brian M. Alexander 1 , Gerald C. Chu 2 , Daniel D. Von Hoff 4 , Anirban Maitra 3 , 5 , 6 , and Alec C. Kimmelman 1
ABSTRACT Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is refractory to available therapies. We have
previously shown that these tumors have elevated autophagy and that inhibition
of autophagy leads to decreased tumor growth. Using an autochthonous model of pancreatic cancer
driven by oncogenic Kras and the stochastic LOH of Trp53 , we demonstrate that although genetic abla-
tion of autophagy in the pancreas leads to increased tumor initiation, these premalignant lesions are
impaired in their ability to progress to invasive cancer, leading to prolonged survival. In addition, mouse
pancreatic cancer cell lines with differing p53 status are all sensitive to pharmacologic and genetic inhi-
bition of autophagy. Finally, a mouse preclinical trial using cohorts of genetically characterized patient-
derived xenografts treated with hydroxychloroquine showed responses across the collection of tumors.
Together, our data support the critical role of autophagy in pancreatic cancer and show that inhibition of
autophagy may have clinical utility in the treatment of these cancers, independent of p53 status.
SIGNIFICANCE: Recently, a mouse model with embryonic homozygous Trp53 deletion showed paradoxi-
cal effects of autophagy inhibition. We used a mouse model with Trp53 LOH (similar to human tumors),
tumor cell lines, and patient-derived xenografts to show that p53 status does not affect response
to autophagy inhibition. These fi ndings have important implications on ongoing clinical trials. Cancer
Discov; 4(8); 905–13. ©2014 AACR.
See related commentary by Amaravadi and Debnath, p. 873.
Authors’ Affi liations: 1 Division of Genomic Stability and DNA Repair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; 2 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mas-sachusetts; 3 Department of Oncology and Pathology, Johns Hopkins Uni-versity School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 4 Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona; Departments of 5 Pathology and 6 Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and 7 Department of Surgery, Tohoku Uni-versity Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Discovery Online (http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/).
A. Yang and N.V. Rajeshkumar contributed equally to this article.
Corresponding Author: Alec C. Kimmelman, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. Phone: 617-632-5195; Fax: 617-249-0371; E-mail: [email protected]
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.
INTRODUCTION
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for
95% of pancreatic cancers and is one of the most lethal
cancers, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 6% ( 1 ).
More than 80% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced
stage, and treatment is very limited. Previously, we identi-
fi ed that human PDACs have elevated basal autophagy, and
either genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of autophagy
[the latter with chloroquine (CQ) treatment] showed robust
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
906 | CANCER DISCOVERY�AUGUST 2014 www.aacrjournals.org
Yang et al.RESEARCH BRIEF
responses in human and mouse PDAC cell lines and tumor
models ( 2 ). Because of its extensive use in human patients
for other indications, multiple clinical trials have opened
using the CQ derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to
inhibit autophagy in patients with pancreatic cancer ( www.
clinicaltrials.gov ).
Autophagy is a catabolic mechanism that recycles cellular
components, and the level is dynamically controlled to main-
tain cell function. When cells are under stress such as starva-
tion, autophagy is elevated to redistribute energy to sustain
cell survival; however, it could also lead to cell death when
the attempts to sustain viability have failed ( 3 ). The dual role
of autophagy also applies to tumorigenesis as it can both
serve as a barrier to cancer initiation and promote cancer
growth by providing energy for advanced malignancies ( 4 ).
This dynamic role of autophagy in cancer has been supported
using various mouse models. Mosaic deletion of Atg5 predis-
poses mice to benign liver adenomas that do not progress to
malignant tumors ( 5 ). Previous data have also shown that
autophagy may play a particularly important role in cancers
driven by oncogenic Kras ( 2 , 6 , 7 ). Indeed, mice engineered to
express oncogenic Kras in the lung with concurrent Atg5 or
Atg7 loss develop increased benign lesions (adenomas), but
fail to progress to malignancy ( 8, 9 ).
Sequence analysis of PDAC has shown that more than 90%
of tumors possess KRAS mutations ( 10 ), and mouse models
have validated the critical role of this oncogene in driving
PDAC formation ( 11, 12 ) and in tumor maintenance ( 13 ). In
addition, PDACs demonstrate a mixture of tumor-suppressor
gene mutations at varying frequencies that have been shown
to constrain tumor progression, including TP53 , CDKN2A ,
and SMAD4 ( 14 ). TP53 is one of the most commonly altered
genes in all of human cancer, and it is found mutated or lost
in the majority (∼75%) of PDAC ( 15 ). In most cases, these
genetic mutations, including in the tumor suppressor gene
TP53 , are acquired via LOH during tumor development ( 15 ).
As a result, a conditional Trp53 deletion allele or a Trp53
mutant allele is often crossed to an activated Kras allele
to accelerate tumorigenesis in PDAC genetically engineered
mouse models (GEMM). This is typically done as a single
copy, as mice with homozygous Trp53 deletion have rapidly
progressive disease that is nonmetastatic ( 16 ), and for these
reasons most treatment studies using PDAC GEMMs have
focused on heterozygous Trp53 models ( 17 ). The hetero-
zygous Trp53 mice develop tumors dependent on the stochas-
tic LOH at the Trp53 locus, analogous to human PDAC ( 18 ).
Recently, the role of autophagy in PDAC progression was
explored using a GEMM ( 19 ). Although loss of Atg5 or Atg7
in the pancreas with an activating Kras mutation completely
inhibited progression of premalignant lesions to invasive can-
cer, in the context of an embryonic homozygous Trp53 dele-
tion in the pancreas, autophagy loss seemed to accelerate the
progression to invasive cancer ( 19 ). However, because of the
nature of the Trp53 homozygous model used, the conclusion
generated from this model might not be fully representative
of human tumors where Tp53 alterations occur by LOH. In
this study, we used a Trp53 heterozygous PDAC GEMM to
study how loss of autophagy affects tumor development in
a situation where p53 is present before tumor initiation and
lost in fully developed tumors, mimicking human PDAC
development. We also explored how tumor cell lines with
TP53 deletions or mutations responded to autophagy inhi-
bition. Finally, we determined how human patient–derived
xenografts responded to autophagy inhibition using HCQ
treatment to assess the clinical signifi cance of TP53 genotypes
on human tumor response.
RESULTS To study the function of autophagy in pancreatic can-
cer development, we generated pancreatic conditional Atg5
knockout mice using a Pdx1 promoter–driven Cre recom-
binase ( Fig. 1A ; ref. 20 ). We fi rst assessed the impact of
homozygous deletion of Atg5 ( Atg5 L/L ) in the pancreas. Pan-
creatic deletion of Atg5 was not embryonic lethal and did not
cause signs of malignant transformation; however, it caused
a cellular disruption in endocrine tissues starting at 12 weeks,
leading to a reduction in insulin-producing β-cells, as had
been shown previously with Atg7 deletion in that compart-
ment (ref. 21 ; Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B). Thus, Atg5 L/L
mice had a reduced long-term survival that was consistent
with previous reports ( Fig. 1B ; ref. 19 ). Given the relatively
restricted phenotype of the Atg5 L/L mice and the long sur-
vival of this cohort, we crossed Atg5 L/L mice into the PDAC
GEMM ( Pdx1Cre + ; lslKras G12D/+ ; Trp53 L/+ ) to assess the role of
autophagy in PDAC development. To this end, we generated
three cohorts with differing Atg5 allelic status: Atg5 +/+ , Atg5 L/+ ,
and Atg5 L/L . This GEMM recapitulates the human condition
beginning from premalignant pancreatic intraepithelial neo-
plasia (PanIN) to invasive and malignant PDAC ( 16 , 18 ). We
fi rst compared the overall survival between the groups and
found that the Atg5 L/L cohort had the longest median survival
( Fig. 1C ). Indeed, there were signifi cantly more long-term
survivors (>30 weeks of age) in this group compared with
either the Atg5 L/+ or Atg5 +/+ cohorts ( P < 0.0005). Interestingly,
we observed that approximately 20% of the Atg5 L/L mice died
before 6 weeks of age, which was not seen in the Atg5 +/+ cohort
(0%) and infrequently (4%) in the Atg5 L/+ group. Analysis of
this small population of Atg5 L/L mice revealed that they did
not die of PDAC but due to acinar destruction as shown by
massive acinar to ductal metaplasia, which led to the disrup-
tion of most of the exocrine pancreas and left on average
less than 10% normal pancreas (Supplementary Fig. S2A and
S2B). The majority of the Atg5 L/L cohort survived past this
early insult and when death due to PDAC was assessed, the
Atg5 L/L mice had a signifi cantly prolonged survival compared
with the Atg5 +/+ and Atg5 L/+ cohorts ( P = 0.0032; Fig. 1D ). To
investigate the mechanism behind the prolonged survival in
the Atg5 L/L mice, we performed a detailed histologic assess-
ment of pancreata at an early time point (6 weeks) and a
later time point (15 weeks) to determine how Atg5 loss affects
both tumor initiation and progression. At 6 weeks, there was
a marked difference in formation of noninvasive precursor
lesions, PanIN, between the cohorts, with the Atg5 L/L group
having on average more than 50 PanINs per mouse compared
with the Atg5 L/+ group, which showed only 2 to 5 PanINs per
mouse ( Fig. 1E ). The difference in PanIN formation was fur-
ther quantifi ed by comparing the fraction of normal pancreas
remaining with that containing PanIN and surrounding
infl ammation ( 22 ). The Atg5 L/L cohort showed 41.7% normal
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
AUGUST 2014�CANCER DISCOVERY | 907
Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth RESEARCH BRIEF
Figure 1. Loss of autophagy extends PDAC survival. A, pancreatic sections stained by IHC for ATG5 expression, showing Pdx1 -driven Cre-mediated deletion of Atg5 . Scale bar, 50 μm. B, Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing overall survival of Pdx1Cre + Atg5 L/+ (blue) and Atg5 L/L (red) mice. Representative sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), illustrating the β-islet disruption in the Atg5 L/L mice. Atg5 L/+ mice are shown as controls. Scale bar, 100 μm. C, Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing overall survival of Trp53 L/+ lslKras G12D/+ Pdx1Cre + mice with Atg5 +/+ (black), Atg5 L/+ (blue), and Atg5 L/L (red). There are signifi cantly more Atg5 L/L mice with long-term survival (>30 weeks) than in the Atg5 +/+ or Atg5 L/+ cohorts ( P < 0.0005, Fisher exact test). H&E staining of representative Trp53 L/+ lslKras G12D/+ Pdx1Cre + Atg5 L/L mice that died before 6 weeks of each due to pancreatic disruption . Scale bar, 100 μM. D, Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing PDAC-specifi c survival of Atg5 +/+ (black), Atg5 L/+ (blue), and Atg5 L/L (red) mice with Trp53 L/+ lslKras G12D/+ Pdx1Cre + . The survival of the Atg5 L/L cohort was signifi cantly longer than that of the Atg5 +/+ cohort (*, P = 0.003, log-rank test). E, quantifi cation of the normal pancreas area of Atg5 L/+ and Atg5 L/L mice at 6 weeks. H&E staining of representative Atg5 L/+ and Atg5 L/L pancreata at 6 and 15 weeks. Proportion of mice that developed PDAC (vs. only PanIN) at 15 weeks in Atg5 L/+ ( n = 10) and Atg5 L/L ( n = 8) mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. F, pancreatic tumors from indicated genotypes stained with cleaved caspase-3, γH2AX, and Ki67 antibody. The number of cleaved caspase-3 or γH2AX-positive cells per fi eld was counted from fi ve random fi elds per mouse. Scale bar, 50 μm. *, P < 0.05 by t test. G, growth curve comparing proliferation of Atg5 +/+ (black, n = 4) and Atg5 L/L (red, n = 4) tumor cell lines at both high- and low-serum conditions. Error bars, SD of the results from four cell lines of each genotype. *, P < 0.05 by t test.
Atg5L/+Atg5L/+
Atg5L/+
Atg5L/+
Atg5L/+
Atg5L/+
Atg5L/+
Atg5L/+
Atg5 +/+
Atg5 +/+Atg5+/+
Atg5+/+
Atg5L/LAtg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/+Atg5+/+ Atg5L/L
Atg5L/+Atg5+/+ Atg5L/L
Atg5L/+Atg5+/+ Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/L
Atg5L/+
Atg5+/+
Atg5L/L
A B C
D E
F G
100
60
60
60
60
40
6 wk6 wk
15 wk
Time (wk)Time (wk)
KrasG12D/+ Trp53L/+
KrasG12D/+ Trp53L/+
Time (wk)
*
*
*
*
*
*
No
rma
l a
rea
(%
)
PD
AC
su
rviv
al (%
)
60
80 100
100100%
75%
50%
25%
100
10
10
10
10
10
12
15 wk
8
10
20
20
20
20
120
20
25
5
5
6 65
3 55
15
30
30
30
40
40
40
50
5040
20
100
60
20
20 200
0
0
59
0
0
01
High serum
PanlN
PDAC
Cle
aved
caspase-3
+
cell
per
field
Rela
tive g
row
thR
ela
tive g
row
th
Ove
rall
su
rviv
al (%
)
Ove
rall
su
rviv
al (%
)
Cleaved
caspase-3
γH2AX γH2A
X+
cell
per
field
Ki6
7+
cell
per
field
Low serum
Day
Day
N
N
N
NN
32 40
1 2 3 4 50
0
0
0
Ki67
pancreatic parenchyma versus 98.6% in the Atg5 L/+ group
( P = 0.0015; Fig. 1E ). At 15 weeks, the normal pancreatic
parenchyma in the Atg5 L/L group further decreased to 31.7%,
but interestingly only 25% of the mice (2 of 8) had invasive
PDAC, whereas 60% of the Atg5 L/+ mice (6 of 10) developed
PDAC ( Fig. 1E ). Together, these data indicate that although
autophagy defi ciency increased PanIN development (tumor
initiation), it inhibits PanIN progression to PDAC. IHC for
ATG5 and LC3 confi rmed that all tumors developed in Atg5 L/L
mice lacked ATG5 expression and had absent autophagy
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
908 | CANCER DISCOVERY�AUGUST 2014 www.aacrjournals.org
Yang et al.RESEARCH BRIEF
(Supplementary Fig. S3A and S3B). Interestingly, cell lines
derived from two of the deleted tumors reestablished Atg5
expression after a few passages, indicating that rare subclones
escaped Pdx1-cre–mediated excision and can grow out in a
small fraction of the tumors (Supplementary Fig. S4A). As
expected, tumors from all three genotypes showed LOH of the
remaining Trp53 allele and did not express p53 protein (Sup-
plementary Fig. S4B). We also assessed tumors from the three
groups for the expression of cleaved caspase-3, γH2AX, and
Ki67 ( Fig. 1F ) to measure apoptosis, DNA damage, and prolif-
eration, respectively, and found that there was elevation of both
apoptosis and DNA damage as well as a decrease in prolifera-
tion in the Atg5 L/L group compared with the Atg5 +/+ or Atg5 L/+
cohorts ( Fig. 1F ). Therefore, in the tumors that were able to
form in the setting of autophagy loss, there was increased DNA
damage and cell death. This is consistent with the fact that
cell lines derived from these autophagy-incompetent tumors
proliferate at a signifi cantly slower rate than Atg5 +/+ tumors
under both high-serum and low-serum conditions ( Fig. 1G ).
Together, our data suggest that autophagy is required for
proper progression of premalignant lesions to invasive PDAC,
and those tumors that do progress are less robust.
Previously, we reported that human PDAC cell lines and
tumors have elevated basal autophagy, and CQ treatment, as
well as suppression of autophagy using RNAi against critical
autophagy genes, could inhibit cell growth in vitro as well as in
xenografts. In addition, CQ treatment signifi cantly prolonged
survival in the lsl Kras G12D ; Trp53 L/+ PDAC GEMM ( 2 ). A recent
study using a Kras -driven PDAC GEMM with an embryonic
Trp53 homozygous deletion showed that either Atg5 or Atg7
deletion promoted tumor progression, thus reducing mouse
survival. In their model, CQ treatment seemed to have a mod-
est reduction in lifespan as well. Given the differences between
our prior and current data using the Trp53 L/+ PDAC GEMM,
and that reported by Rosenfeldt and colleagues ( 19 ) using
the Trp53 L/L GEMM, we examined the impact of autophagy
inhibition in a panel of murine PDAC cell lines with vary-
ing Trp53 genotypes ( Trp53 L/+ , Trp53 L/L , and p53 R172H/+ ). As
the majority of the human clinical trials are using CQ or its
derivative, HCQ, we focused on response to CQ given its clini-
cal relevance. As has been reported in the past ( 18 ), the wild-
type (WT) allele of Trp53 was lost in Trp53 L/+ , Trp53 L/L , and
the Trp53 R172H/+ lines, as confi rmed by PCR (Supplementary
Fig. S5A). Western blot analysis showed loss of p53 expression
in the Trp53 L/+ and Trp53 L/L lines, whereas Trp53 mutations
were detected in the Trp53 R172H/+ lines (DNA point mutation
confi rmed by sequencing; Supplementary Fig. S5B and S5C).
All PDAC lines, independent of the Trp53 genotype, showed a
signifi cant, dose-dependent reduction in clonogenic growth
when treated with CQ ( Fig. 2A ). We had previously shown that
one of the consequences of autophagy inhibition in human
PDAC cells was a decrease in oxidative phosphorylation
(measured by oxygen consumption; ref. 2 ). Consistent with
these fi ndings, all cell lines, independent of TP53 status, had a
signifi cantly reduced baseline oxygen consumption rate (OCR;
Fig. 2B ). To validate the CQ data, we repeated the clonogenic
assays using shRNAs to either ATG5 or ATG7 . Suppression of
expression of both ATG genes and autophagy inhibition was
confi rmed by Western blot analysis (Supplementary Fig. S6).
Similar to the CQ data, suppression of autophagy via RNAi
signifi cantly attenuated clonogenic growth independent of
the TP53 genotype ( Fig. 2C ).
Finally, to model the therapeutic situation that is occur-
ring in ongoing human clinical trials, we performed effi cacy
trials using 12 individual human patient–derived pancreatic
cancer xenografts (PDX) treated with HCQ or saline control.
Mice with established pancreatic tumors were treated with
HCQ, and tumor growth was compared with the vehicle-
treated mice. The overwhelming majority of the PDX lines
showed a reduction in tumor volume compared with controls
( P < 0.05), with a third of the PDX lines showing more than
20% inhibition of tumor growth compared with the tumors
in the vehicle-treated mice ( Fig. 3B ). All tumors had KRAS
mutations (except P410) and TP53 mutations (except JH024;
Supplementary Table S1). Interestingly, consistent with pre-
vious fi ndings of the role of autophagy in KRAS -mutant can-
cers ( 2 , 8 ), the KRAS WT tumor did not seem to have elevated
autophagy by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and
did not respond to HCQ treatment ( Fig. 3A and B ). IHC for
LC3 in the treated tumors showed that HCQ increased the
LC3 punctate staining in the HCQ-treated samples, consist-
ent with effective autophagy inhibition. In line with the TEM
data, the KRAS WT tumor had the lowest amount of basal
puncta that did show an increase upon HCQ treatment ( Fig.
3C ). In addition, the fact that all the TP53 -mutant tumors
showed varying degrees of response further supports the fact
that disruption of the p53 axis does not affect response to
antiautophagy therapies. Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3 stain-
ing of the three best responders versus the KRAS WT non-
responder was consistent with its effect on tumor volume:
HCQ treatment signifi cantly inhibited tumor cell prolifera-
tion and increased apoptosis in the responders but had mini-
mal impact on the nonresponder ( Fig. 3D and E ).
DISCUSSION In this study, we have used multiple orthogonal approaches
(autochthonous models, cell lines, and human tumor
xenografts) to demonstrate that disruption of the p53 axis
(a fi nding observed in 75% of PDAC) has no impact on the
effi cacy of autophagy inhibition. We used a PDAC GEMM
( Pdx1Cre + ; lslKras G12D/+ ; Trp53 L/+ ) in which Trp53 is lost by
stochastic LOH as seen in human tumors and determined
the role of autophagy in PDAC progression using a condi-
tional Atg5 allele. We found that deletion of Atg5 predisposed
mice to premalignant pancreatic lesions as evidenced by the
increased occurrence of PanINs. On the other hand, mice
with Atg5 deletion were signifi cantly less likely to develop
PDAC and therefore had improved survival.
The role of autophagy in tumorigenesis is controversial
because there are studies supporting both its being a sup-
pressor and a promoter. Evidence to support autophagy as
a tumor suppressor comes from studies in which autophagy
genes were deleted in mice. With the exception of Becn1, in
which the heterozygote was used and autophagy was only
partially attenuated, these studies have shown that loss of
autophagy predisposes mice to benign tumors ( 4 , 23 , 24 ). In
contrast, evidence to support autophagy as a tumor promoter
comes from studies of advanced tumors, in which blocking
autophagy inhibits tumor growth and can synergize with
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
AUGUST 2014�CANCER DISCOVERY | 909
Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth RESEARCH BRIEF
Figure 2. Autophagy inhibition reduces colony formation and reduces baseline OCR independent of p53 status. A, CQ reduces clonogenic growth (blank bar, 0 μmol/L CQ; 10% dotted bar, 7.5 μmol/L CQ; 25% dotted bar, 15 μmol/L CQ). Error bars, SD of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. *, P < 0.005 by t test. B, CQ reduces baseline OCR in tumor cell lines. A representative OCR plot is shown for one cell line of each genotype. Error bars, SD of triplicate wells. *, P < 0.05 by t test. Bottom, quantifi cation of the reduction in baseline OCRs from cell lines of each indicated Trp53 genotype. Error bars, SD from three experiments. C, clonogenic assay shows that knocking down autophagy reduces colony formation independent of Trp53 genotype. Blank bar, shGFP; 10% dotted bar, shAtg5; 25% dotted bar, shAtg7. Error bars, SD of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. *, P < 0.05 by t test.
1.0
* *
*
*
* **
*
*
* **
*
**
** * * *
* *
*
*
* *
**
* *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
A
B
C
0.5
Ratio o
f colo
nie
s
0
#1 #2 #3
#3
#1
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12
0
–25
–50
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
#2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12
#8CtrlCQ
Ctrl
CQ
250
150
50
300 200 Ctrl
CQ
100
0 21 42
Time (min)
63 84
200
100
OC
R (
pm
ol/m
in)
OC
R (
pm
ol/m
in)
OC
R (
pm
ol/m
in)
0 21 42
Time (min)
OC
R b
aselin
e r
eduction (
%)
Ratio o
f colo
nie
s
Time (min)
63 84 0 21 42 63 84
#4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12
#12
Trp53 +/−
Trp53 −/−
Trp53R172H/+
Trp53+/−
Trp53 −/−
Trp53R172H/+
Trp53+/−
Trp53−/−
Trp53R172H/+
chemotherapy in mouse models ( 2 , 25 ). Our data suggest
a dual role for autophagy in PDAC development, whereby
autophagy loss increases the initiation of tumors, but abro-
gates the effi cient progression to invasive cancer.
Several prior studies have shown that autophagy deletion
attenuates malignant tumor formation in lslKras G12D/+ tumor
models ( 8, 9 ). However, the role of p53 in this process is com-
plex, with studies reporting results that differ in terms of how
tumorigenesis affects autophagy loss with concurrent Trp53
deletion ( 9 , 19 ). A recent study using a PDAC GEMM showed
that the impact of autophagy inhibition differed depending
on whether Trp53 was concurrently deleted or not ( 19 ). Some
of these differences could be due to the models used, or, alter-
natively, that particular ATG genes may have nonoverlapping
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
910 | CANCER DISCOVERY�AUGUST 2014 www.aacrjournals.org
Yang et al.RESEARCH BRIEF
Figure 3. HCQ treatment selectively suppressed tumor growth and proliferation in PDXs with active baseline autophagy. A, representative TEM pho-tomicrographs of autophagy in PDXs. Arrows, autophagosomes. B, effi cacy of HCQ in a panel of 12 individual patient-derived PDXs ( n = 8–10 tumors per PDX). C, LC3 staining of PDX tumors treated with vehicle or HCQ. Small black squared area is enlarged in the left corner. Scale bar, 20 μm. Numbers of LC3 puncta per fi eld were quantifi ed (*, P < 0.05, t test). D, representative photomicrographs of Ki67-stained tumor sections in PDXs sensitive or resistant to HCQ treatment. The number of Ki67 + cells was quantifi ed for each line. Five fi elds were counted from two tumors for each PDX (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, t test). Scale bar, 50 μm. E, cleaved caspase-3 staining of PDX tumors and positive cells per fi eld were quantifi ed (*, P < 0.05). Scale bar, 50 μm.
A P198
P265
P198Vehicle
Vehicle
60 P198 P410
40
LC
3 p
uncta
per
field
LC
3 p
uncta
per
field
Ki6
7+ c
ells
10
2 p
er
fie
ldK
i67
+ c
ells
10
2 p
er
fie
ld
Ki6
7+ c
ells
10
2 p
er
fie
ldK
i67
+ c
ells
10
2 p
er
fie
ld
Cl.
ca
sp.-
3+ c
ells
pe
r fie
ldC
l. ca
sp.-
3+ c
ells
pe
r fie
ld
Cl.
ca
sp.-
3+ c
ells
pe
r fie
ldC
l. ca
sp.-
3+ c
ells
pe
r fie
ld
20
0
60
40
LC
3 p
uncta
per
field
20
0
60
40
LC
3 p
uncta
per
field
20
0
60 4 4 15 4
2
30
20
10
10
5
30
20
10
3
2
1
4
5
3
2
1
P198P198 P410
**
*
*
*
*
***
*
*
P410
Vehicle
3
2
1
4
3
2
1
40
20
0
HCQ
Vehicle
JH015P265
JH015 P265 JH015 P265
HCQ
Vehicle HCQ Vehicle HCQ Vehicle HCQ Vehicle HCQ Vehicle HCQ Vehicle HCQ
Vehicle HCQ HCQ Vehicle HCQ Vehicle HCQ Vehicle HCQ
HCQ
P410
P198Vehicle
Vehicle HCQ
HCQP198
Vehicle HCQ
P410 Vehicle HCQP410
JH015
40
30
KrasMut20
Tum
or
gro
wth
co
mp
are
d w
ith
co
ntr
ol (%
)
10
0P198 JH015 P265 JH010 P374 P194 P281 P253 P185 P215 JH024
P410
KrasWT−10
−20
−30
−40
P410
C D E
B
functions that are independent of autophagy. In addition,
there are likely differences regarding whether Trp53 is deleted
homozygously in the germline, or if one copy is lost by
somatic LOH (mimicking the cognate human phenomenon).
Our data are consistent with prior reports showing that loss
of autophagy can promote the initiation of tumorigenesis in
the pancreas, and prevent the progression to cancer in the
setting of oncogenic Kras mutations ( 19 ). However, unlike
the data from Rosenfeldt and colleagues ( 19 ), our work shows
that Atg5 deletion impairs the progression of premalignant
PanIN to invasive PDAC in the setting of Trp53 loss. We
believe that this difference stems from the fact that in their
study, Trp53 was homozygously deleted during embryogen-
esis. Therefore, in the physiologic setting of Trp53 loss during
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
AUGUST 2014�CANCER DISCOVERY | 911
Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth RESEARCH BRIEF
tumor progression, autophagy seems to be required for opti-
mal PDAC development. The intricate and complex relation-
ship of autophagy and p53 is of great importance and awaits
further study ( 26 ).
Perhaps most relevant to cancer treatment, we showed that
acute inhibition of autophagy by CQ treatment or RNAi
inhibited growth of murine PDAC cell lines with various Trp53
alterations, and is consistent with our prior data using human
PDAC cell lines, which almost all harbor TP53 mutations
( 2 ). Finally, we used a large panel of patient-derived PDAC
xenografts and performed treatment studies using HCQ. HCQ
treatment attenuated the growth of the majority of primary
patient-derived PDAC xenografts that harbor TP53 mutations.
Together, our data continue to support the integration of
antiautophagy therapies into the treatment of PDAC. Ongo-
ing human clinical trials in PDAC will determine whether this
approach is feasible and effective in patients.
METHODS Genetically Engineered Mice
Atg5 L/L mice were kindly provided by Dr. Noboru Mizushima
( The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; ref. 27 ). Trp53 L/L mice were
obtained from Anton Berns ( Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amster-
dam, The Netherlands; ref. 28 ). Pdx1 -Cre was obtained from Doug
Melton ( Harvard University, Boston, MA; ref. 20 ). All animal experi-
ments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Com-
mittee under protocol 10-055 at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
(Boston, MA). Mice were maintained on a mixed background. Survival
was determined by humane endpoints as specifi ed by the protocol,
including showing signs of being moribund, signifi cant weight loss,
skin ulceration, or in rare cases being found dead. All mice with
PDAC-specifi c death were histologically confi rmed.
Histology All tissues were fi xed in 10% formalin overnight and embedded
in paraffi n. For IHC, tumors were deparaffi nized and rehydrated.
After antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH, 6.0), tumors were
labeled with primary antibody overnight and then detected using
the VECTASTAIN Elite ABC Kit (pk-6100; Vector Labs) and DAB
(sk-4100; Vector labs). Antibodies used for immunohistology are
ATG5 (1:200; NB110-53818; Novus Biologicals), cleaved caspase-3
(1:200; D175; Cell Signaling Technology), γH2AX (1:100; clone
JBW301; Millipore), and LC3 (1:100, NBP1-19167; Novus Bio-
logicals). Ki67 staining was performed using an anti–MIB-1 (Ki67)
antibody (Ventana Medical Systems; clone K2; 1:100 dilutions) as
previously described ( 29 ). Sections from two tumors per treatment
group were examined microscopically, and more than fi ve repre-
sentative fi elds from each slide were photographed under ×200
magnifi cations (except LC3, which was taken at ×1,000 magnifi ca-
tion; ref. 30 ).
Cell Culture All cell lines were derived from mouse primary tumors and grown
in DMEM (11965; Invitrogen) with 10% FBS and 1% Penstrep. The
Trp53 L/L and Trp53 R172H lines were obtained from Dr. H. Ying (The
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)
and Dr. D. Tuveson (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring
Harbor, New York). Cells were regenotyped to verify p53 status, and
Western blot analyses were used to confi rm p53 protein expression.
Trp53 -mutant cell lines were sequenced to verify the presence of the
mutation. Atg5 L/L lines were harvested from an approximately 5-mm 2
chunk of tumor, minced, and digested in 4% collagenase/dispase
for 1 hour. Cell lines were routinely tested and all were negative for
mycoplasma infection.
Clonogenic Assay Cells were plated in 6-cm dishes at 500 cells per dish in growth
medium with 10% FBS and treated with CQ the day after seeding.
After 7 days, cells were fi xed in 80% methanol and stained with 0.2%
crystal violet, and colonies were counted. The surviving fraction was
calculated using the plating effi ciency.
Growth Curves Cells were plated in 24-well plates at 3,000 cells per well in 1 mL of
media. Media were not changed throughout the course of the experi-
ment. At the indicated time points, cells were fi xed in 10% formalin
and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Dye was extracted with 10% ace-
tic acid, and the relative proliferation was determined by attenuance
(D) at 595 nm.
OCR Oxygen consumption measurements: 1.5 × 10 4 cells were seeded
in a 96-well Seahorse plate, and OCRs were measured using the Sea-
horse XF96 Instrument (Seahorse Biosciences). Basal mitochondrial
respiration (3 mmol/L glucose) and ATP production (2 mmol/L
oligomycin) were measured. Maximal respiration was obtained by
carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifl uoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP;
0.5 mmol/L), and non-mitochondrial OCRs were obtained by adding
2 mmol/L antimycin A. Values were normalized by protein concen-
tration to account for cell number.
Western Blot Analysis Proteins were extracted by RIPA buffer and separated on 4% to 12%
stacking SDS–PAGE gel. Proteins were then transferred to polyvinyli-
dene difl uoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked
with 5% nonfat dry milk and then incubated with the primary antibody
overnight at 4°C. Following Tris Buffered Saline with Tween 20 (TBST)
washing, membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated sec-
ondary antibody for 1 hour and exposed on fi lm using the Enhanced
Chemiluminescence (ECL) Detection System (Thermo Scientifi c).
Antibodies used were as follows: ATG5 (1:500; NB110-53818; Novus
Biologicals), ATG7 (1:300; A2856; Sigma), LC3B (1:500; NB600-1384;
Novus Biologicals), p53 (1:1,000; FL-393; Santa Cruz Biotechnology),
and β-actin (1:3,000; A2066; Sigma).
Lentivirus-Mediated shRNAs All shRNA vectors were obtained from the RNA Interfer-
ence Screening Facility of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Atg5
(TRCN0000375819) and Atg7 (TRCN0000092163) shGFP: forward 5′, CCGGCGCAAGCTGACCCTGAGTTCATTCAAGAGATGAACTTCA
GGGTCAGCTTGCTTTTT; reverse 5′, AATTAAAAAGCAAGCTGAC
CCTGAAGTTCATCTCTTGAATGAACTCAGGGTCAGCTTGCG ( 31 ).
Lentivirus was produced using 293T cells, as previously described ( 2 ).
Electron Microscopy Freshly harvested subcutaneous tumors from mice were fi xed
immediately with 3% paraformaldehyde, 1.5% glutaraldehyde, and
2.5% sucrose in 0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate and cut into 1-mm 3
squares. After postfi xation in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 hour on ice
and dehydration, the samples were embedded in a mixture of Epon–
araldite. Thin sections from four blocks were collected on uncoated
grids, stained with uranil and lead citrate. Samples were sectioned
and examined using an FEI Tecnai 12 Transmission Electron Micro-
scope equipped with a 16-bit 2K × 2K FEI Eagle bottom-mount
camera and an SIS MegaView III wide-angle camera. Images were
captured at ×12,000 magnifi cation ( 32 ).
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
912 | CANCER DISCOVERY�AUGUST 2014 www.aacrjournals.org
Yang et al.RESEARCH BRIEF
In Vivo Effi cacy of HCQ in Human PDXs Animal experiments were conducted following approval and in
accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
guidelines of the Johns Hopkins University under protocol
MO06M385. A total of 12 human PDXs established from the pri-
mary tumors, resected from patients with pancreatic cancer at
the Johns Hopkins Hospital, were used for the study ( 33 ). The
mutational status of these tumors was previously reported ( 14 )
and is shown as Supplementary Table S1. Fresh tumors resected
from mice were cut into cubes of 2 mm 3 , and were subcutaneously
implanted on both fl anks of 6-week-old female nu/nu athymic mice
(Harlan). When cohorts of tumors reached approximately 150 mm 3 ,
animals (5 mice per group, each group with 8–10 tumors) were ran-
domly assigned to receive vehicle or HCQ (60 mg/kg, i.p., once daily
for 4 weeks) treatments ( 2 ). Tumors were measured twice per week,
and tumor volumes were calculated using the following formula:
V = ( a × b 2) /2, where a is the largest dimension and b the smallest.
Tumor growth in HCQ-treated animals was compared with that in
vehicle-treated mice.
Statistical Analysis Overall survival events included death as defi ned by the protocol
with censoring for alive at last follow-up. Events for PDAC-specifi c
survival included deaths attributable to PDAC with uninformative
censoring for deaths related to other causes or at last follow-up. Sur-
vival plots were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-
rank test was used to compare survival distributions between groups.
The proportion of mice alive at 30 weeks or longer in the Atg5 L/L
group was compared with the other two groups using a Fisher exact
test. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.0.2 ( 34 ).
Disclosure of Potential Confl icts of Interest A.C. Kimmelman has received honoraria from the speakers’ bureau
of US Oncology and is a consultant/advisory board member for
Forma Therapeutics and Gilead. No potential confl icts of interest
were disclosed by the other authors.
Authors’ Contributions Conception and design: A. Yang, N.V. Rajeshkumar, B.M. Alexan-
der, A. Maitra, A.C. Kimmelman
Development of methodology: A. Yang, N.V. Rajeshkumar,
B.M. Alexander, A. Maitra
Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed
patients, provided facilities, etc.): A. Yang, S. Yabuuchi, A. Maitra
Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis,
biostatistics, computational analysis): A. Yang, N.V. Rajeshkumar,
X. Wang, S. Yabuuchi, B.M. Alexander, G.C. Chu, A.C. Kimmelman
Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: A. Yang,
N.V. Rajeshkumar, B.M. Alexander, D.D. Von Hoff, A. Maitra,
A.C. Kimmelman
Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting
or organizing data, constructing databases): A. Yang, X. Wang,
B.M. Alexander, D.D. Von Hoff
Study supervision: A. Maitra, A.C. Kimmelman
Acknowledgments The authors thank David Tuveson and Haoqiang Ying for provid-
ing mouse PDAC lines and Noboru Mizushima for the conditional
Atg5 -null mice.
Grant Support This work was supported by National Cancer Institute grant
R01CA157490, American Cancer Society (ACS) Research Scholar
grant RSG-13-298-01-TBG, and the Lustgarten Foundation
(to A.C. Kimmelman), and an SU2C–AACR Translational Research
Dream Team SU2C–AACR-DT0509 grant (to A. Maitra, N.V. Rajesh-
kumar, and D.D. Von Hoff).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by
the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby
marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734
solely to indicate this fact.
Received April 4, 2014; revised May 19, 2014; accepted May 21,
2014; published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014.
REFERENCES
1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts & Figures 2013 . Atlanta:
American Cancer Society; 2013 .
2. Yang S , Wang X , Contino G , Liesa M , Sahin E , Ying H , et al. Pancreatic
cancers require autophagy for tumor growth . Genes Dev 2011 ; 25 :
717 – 29 .
3. Levine B , Kroemer G . Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease . Cell
2008 ; 132 : 27 – 42 .
4. Kimmelman AC . The dynamic nature of autophagy in cancer . Genes
Dev 2011 ; 25 : 1999 – 2010 .
5. Takamura A , Komatsu M , Hara T , Sakamoto A , Kishi C , Waguri S ,
et al. Autophagy-defi cient mice develop multiple liver tumors . Genes
Dev 2011 ; 25 : 795 – 800 .
6. Guo JY , Chen HY , Mathew R , Fan J , Strohecker AM , Karsli-Uzunbas
G , et al. Activated Ras requires autophagy to maintain oxidative
metabolism and tumorigenesis . Genes Dev 2011 ; 25 : 460 – 70 .
7. Lock R , Roy S , Kenifi c CM , Su JS , Salas E , Ronen SM , et al. Autophagy
facilitates glycolysis during Ras-mediated oncogenic transformation .
Mol Biol Cell 2011 ; 22 : 165 – 78 .
8. Guo JY , Karsli-Uzunbas G , Mathew R , Aisner SC , Kamphorst JJ , Stro-
hecker AM , et al. Autophagy suppresses progression of K-ras-induced
lung tumors to oncocytomas and maintains lipid homeostasis . Genes
Dev 2013 ; 27 : 1447 – 61 .
9. Rao S , Tortola L , Perlot T , Wirnsberger G , Novatchkova M , Nitsch R ,
et al. A dual role for autophagy in a murine model of lung cancer . Nat
Commun 2014 ; 5 : 3056 .
10. Almoguera C , Shibata D , Forrester K , Martin J , Arnheim N , Perucho
M . Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant
c-K-ras genes . Cell 1988 ; 53 : 549 – 54 .
11. Aguirre AJ , Bardeesy N , Sinha M , Lopez L , Tuveson DA , Horner J ,
et al. Activated Kras and Ink4a/Arf defi ciency cooperate to produce
metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma . Genes Dev 2003 ; 17 :
3112 – 26 .
12. Hingorani SR , Petricoin EF , Maitra A , Rajapakse V , King C , Jacobetz
MA , et al. Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its
early detection in the mouse . Cancer Cell 2003 ; 4 : 437 – 50 .
13. Ying H , Kimmelman AC , Lyssiotis CA , Hua S , Chu GC , Fletcher-
Sananikone E , et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors
through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism . Cell 2012 ; 149 :
656 – 70 .
14. Jones S , Zhang X , Parsons DW , Lin JC , Leary RJ , Angenendt P , et al.
Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by
global genomic analyses . Science 2008 ; 321 : 1801 – 6 .
15. Nigro JM , Baker SJ , Preisinger AC , Jessup JM , Hostetter R , Cleary
K , et al. Mutations in the p53 gene occur in diverse human tumour
types . Nature 1989 ; 342 : 705 – 8 .
16. Bardeesy N , Aguirre AJ , Chu GC , Cheng KH , Lopez LV , Hezel AF , et al.
Both p16(Ink4a) and the p19(Arf)-p53 pathway constrain progres-
sion of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the mouse . Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A 2006 ; 103 : 5947 – 52 .
17. Westphalen CB , Olive KP . Genetically engineered mouse models of
pancreatic cancer . Cancer J 2012 ; 18 : 502 – 10 .
18. Hingorani SR , Wang L , Multani AS , Combs C , Deramaudt TB ,
Hruban RH , et al. Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote
chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma in mice . Cancer Cell 2005 ; 7 : 469 – 83 .
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
AUGUST 2014�CANCER DISCOVERY | 913
Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth RESEARCH BRIEF
19. Rosenfeldt MT , O’Prey J , Morton JP , Nixon C , MacKay G , Mrowinska
A , et al. p53 status determines the role of autophagy in pancreatic
tumour development . Nature 2013 ; 504 : 296 – 300 .
20. Gu G , Dubauskaite J , Melton DA . Direct evidence for the pancreatic
lineage: NGN3+ cells are islet progenitors and are distinct from duct
progenitors . Development 2002 ; 129 : 2447 – 57 .
21. Ebato C , Uchida T , Arakawa M , Komatsu M , Ueno T , Komiya K ,
et al. Autophagy is important in islet homeostasis and compensatory
increase of beta cell mass in response to high-fat diet . Cell Metab
2008 ; 8 : 325 – 32 .
22. von Figura G , Wagner M , Nalapareddy K , Hartmann D , Kleger A ,
Guachalla LM , et al. Regeneration of the exocrine pancreas is delayed
in telomere-dysfunctional mice . PLoS ONE 2011 ; 6 : e17122 .
23. Qu X , Yu J , Bhagat G , Furuya N , Hibshoosh H , Troxel A , et al. Pro-
motion of tumorigenesis by heterozygous disruption of the beclin 1
autophagy gene . J Clin Invest 2003 ; 112 : 1809 – 20 .
24. Yue Z , Jin S , Yang C , Levine AJ , Heintz N . Beclin 1, an autophagy gene
essential for early embryonic development, is a haploinsuffi cient
tumor suppressor . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003 ; 100 : 15077 – 82 .
25. Amaravadi RK , Yu D , Lum JJ , Bui T , Christophorou MA , Evan GI ,
et al. Autophagy inhibition enhances therapy-induced apoptosis in a
Myc-induced model of lymphoma . J Clin Invest 2007 ; 117 : 326 – 36 .
26. Maiuri MC , Galluzzi L , Morselli E , Kepp O , Malik SA , Kroemer
G . Autophagy regulation by p53 . Curr Opin Cell Biol 2010 ; 22 : 181 – 5 .
27. Hara T , Nakamura K , Matsui M , Yamamoto A , Nakahara Y , Suzuki-
Migishima R , et al. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural
cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice . Nature 2006 ; 441 :
885 – 9 .
28. Marino S , Vooijs M , van Der Gulden H , Jonkers J , Berns A . Induction
of medulloblastomas in p53-null mutant mice by somatic inactiva-
tion of Rb in the external granular layer cells of the cerebellum . Genes
Dev 2000 ; 14 : 994 – 1004 .
29. Yabuuchi S , Pai SG , Campbell NR , de Wilde RF , De Oliveira E , Kor-
angath P , et al. Notch signaling pathway targeted therapy suppresses
tumor progression and metastatic spread in pancreatic cancer .
Cancer Lett 2013 ; 335 : 41 – 51 .
30. Mizuma M , Rasheed ZA , Yabuuchi S , Omura N , Campbell NR , de Wilde
RF , et al. The gamma secretase inhibitor MRK-003 attenuates pancre-
atic cancer growth in preclinical models . Mol Cancer Ther 2012 ; 11 :
1999 – 2009 .
31. Stewart SA , Dykxhoorn DM , Palliser D , Mizuno H , Yu EY , An DS ,
et al. Lentivirus-delivered stable gene silencing by RNAi in primary
cells . RNA 2003 ; 9 : 493 – 501 .
32. McCaffery JM , Farquhar MG . Localization of GTPases by indirect
immunofl uorescence and immunoelectron microscopy . Methods
Enzymol 1995 ; 257 : 259 – 79 .
33. Hidalgo M , Bruckheimer E , Rajeshkumar NV , Garrido-Laguna I , De
Oliveira E , Rubio-Viqueira B , et al. A pilot clinical study of treatment
guided by personalized tumorgrafts in patients with advanced cancer .
Mol Cancer Ther 2011 ; 10 : 1311 – 6 .
34. Team RDC , editor . R: A language and environment for statistical com-
puting . Vienna, Austria : R Foundation for Statistical Computing ; 2008 .
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362
2014;4:905-913. Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014.Cancer Discovery Annan Yang, N.V. Rajeshkumar, Xiaoxu Wang, et al. Progression in Tumors with p53 AlterationsAutophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth and
Updated version
10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362doi:
Access the most recent version of this article at:
Material
Supplementary
http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2014/06/03/2159-8290.CD-14-0362.DC1
Access the most recent supplemental material at:
Cited articles
http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/4/8/905.full#ref-list-1
This article cites 32 articles, 14 of which you can access for free at:
Citing articles
http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/4/8/905.full#related-urls
This article has been cited by 34 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at:
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/4/8/905To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
Research. on September 14, 2020. © 2014 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst May 29, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362