Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and...

32
Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011

Transcript of Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and...

Page 1: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Automated Bridge Scour Inspection

FSU/FAMU College of EngineeringTeam 7

Detailed Design Review and Test Plan2/8/2011

Page 2: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.
Page 3: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

-Vertical DC motor-Motor Controller-2 SLA Batteries

-MicroController-Sonar-NiMH Battery-Tilt Servo-Circular DC Motor

Vertical Guide Rail

Circular Rail

Page 4: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Vertical Motion Drive

Design Updates:

• Revised gearhead selection

• Previously a 28:1 Ratio

• Now a 26:1 Ratio

• Trade-off: Availability vs. Over-specification

• Comparable Performance:

• Slightly slower ascent

• Moderately higher percentage of motor output ability

Page 5: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Vertical Motion Drive

Design Updates:

• Revised encoder selection

• Previously using Magneto-Resistant (MR)

• Now using Optical

• Trade-off: Availability vs. Cost

• Comparable Performance:

• 500 CPR vs. 512 CPR

Page 6: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Vertical Motion Drive

Mechanical Test Plan:

• Part One:

• Confirm rated no-load output velocity

• Measure angular velocity with tachymeter

• Part Two:

• Prior to full integration, simulated mass lift

• Confirm loaded output torque ability

• Protect components prior to integrated test

Page 7: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Circular Motion Drive

Design Updates:

• Unchanged Motor/Encoder/Gearhead

• Revised drive-surface interaction

• Previously: Geared drive-surface on guiderail

• Now: High-friction contact drive

• Trade-off: Manufacturability vs. Precision

Page 8: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Circular Motion Drive

Mechanical Test Plan:

• Part One:

• Confirm rated no-load output velocity

• Measure angular velocity with tachymeter

• Part Two:

• Prior to full integration, full-speed revolution

• Confirm loaded output torque and velocity

• Protect components prior to integrated test

Page 9: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

SONAR Tilt Servo Drive

Design Updates:

• Unchanged Servo Motor selection

• Low risk of failure under load

• Focus on adequate positioning

Page 10: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

SONAR Tilt Servo Drive

Mechanical Test Plan:

• Prior to SONAR integration

• Simulate moment arm to represent transducer

• Demonstrate loaded angular range of motion

• Confirm inspection range capability

Page 11: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Vertical Motion Updates

•Material

•Aluminum vs Stainless

•Rollers

•Drivers

•Idlers

•Bearings

•Size Constraint

Page 12: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Bearings and Rollers

Page 13: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Circumferential Motion Updates

•Material

•Design

•Driver

•Idlers

•Expectations

Page 14: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Circular Guide Rail

• Changes

• Size and Shape

• Material

• Connection

• Manufacturing

• Ideas

• Simplify

Page 15: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Testing

•Vertical and Circumferential Motion

• Degrees of Freedom

•Waterproofing

•Step by Step

Page 16: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Electrical Design

Updated Plan- Use two Battery sources Higher-Power →Motor Controller,DC motors Lower-Power →Microcontroller,servo,

sonar

Page 17: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Higher-Power Design

• Battery →Sealed Lead Acid Battery (SLA)

- Most likely will be 12 Volt, 3 Ahr SLAs

- Will need 2 of these to make 24V in series

Fuse and Switch on positive battery wire to motor controller

Page 18: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

High-Power Design

Why use 2 -12 Volt 3Ahr Battery? The Vert. DC motor → 24V ~3A continous

Running for < 3 minutes for a final test run. The Circular motor → 12V ~300mA cont.

Running for < 10 minutes for a final test run.

Page 19: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

# of Test Runs

Amps Drawn by Vert. motor Amps drawn by circ. motor Total Ahr

1 <3 min... 3/60 * 3A= .15Ahr <10min...10/60 *0.3A= .05 Ahr 0.2

2 0.3 0.1 0.4

3 0.45 0.15 0.6

4 0.6 0.2 0.8

5 0.75 0.25 1

6 0.9 0.3 1.2

7 1.05 0.35 1.4

8 1.2 0.4 1.6

9 1.35 0.45 1.8

10 1.5 0.5 2

Estimate Current Draw per Test

Page 20: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Lower-Power Design

• Battery → NiMH

• MicroController needs 5V ~500mA ..Max 2A

• Voltage regulator to get constant 5V

• May need heat sink

• Power to servo and sonar sensor as well

• Battery size depends on final servo, sonar choice. Neither should be current demanding components

Page 21: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

The Beaglejuice

$88

4500 mAh battery

5V output

1.5A current delivery

powers a BeagleBoard for at least 6.5 hrs

on/off switch

Possible option for battery source, mounts below the microcontroller, space saver

Page 22: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Microcontroller

Version: Xm Version: rev. C4

1 GHz ARM Cortex A8

600MHz ARM Cortex A8

512MB LPDDR 256MB LPDDR

4 USB 1 USB

RS-232 Serial & I2C RS-232 Serial & I2C

Page 23: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Expansion Board

Zippy2

• I2C 1.8v to 5v

• 2nd RS-232 port

• 2nd SD slot

• Ethernet

Page 24: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Programming – Autonomous Movement

Motor Controller & Motors Coding

• Sabertooth: In simplified Serial Mode

• RS-232 port

• Using single 8byte commands to control speed & direction of motors

• Each motor 7bits of Resolution

• Motor1: 1-127

• Motor2: 128-255

Page 25: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Programming – Autonomous Movement

Encoders & Servo Coding

• I2C interface

• Encoders: Counting the leading & falling edge to determine distances

• Servo: PWM (Pulse Width Modulation)

Page 26: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Testing

Autonomous Movement Program

• Program Simulations: I/O Signals

• MCU & Oscilloscope: PWM - Pulse Widths approx.: 1ms to 2ms - Period: 10ms to 2ms

• MCU & Signal Generator: Simulate encoder input (Square Waves)

Page 27: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

SONAR – Control Test

• Humminbird HDR 650• Transducer/Display combo• 2ft. – 600ft.• Verify data accuracy from

other transducers• ~ 1.2in. Resolution• 200kHz• Strictly handheld; will not

be connected to MCU

Page 28: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

SONAR Transducer

• Furuno USA• 235 kHz• 7 degrees• 0.04m – 100m• NMEA 0183 – ASCII serial

communications • Sentence structure: DDBT, DDPT

Page 29: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

NMEA 0183 Sentence Structure

•8 bits•4800bps•Checksum = hexadecimal; XOR of all char between $ and *

Page 30: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.

Microcontroller 1 $170.00 $170.00

Motor Control Unit 1 $137.00 $137.00

12V DC Motor/encoder 1 $40.00 $40.00

SONAR 3 $200.00 $600.00

SLA Battery 12V 3.2Ahr 2 $12.00 $24.00

24V DC Motor/encoder 1 $431.05 $431.05

Beagle Juice (Battery) 1 $88.00 $88.00

Mounting Materials $100.00

Circular Ring 1 $300.00 $300.00

High-Friction Rollers 3 $1.20 $3.60

Ball Bearings 4 $12.00 $48.00

Shaft 1 $5.00 $5.00

Square Vertical Rail 1 $10.00 $10.00

Servo 1 $20.00 $20.00

Wires, fuses. i.e N/A N/A $5.00

Software Licenses $100.00

Test Supplies $120.00

Soldering Kit 1 $15.00 $15.00

Robot casing and fittings

$50.00

Total Cost= $2266.60

Page 31: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.
Page 32: Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Detailed Design Review and Test Plan 2/8/2011.