Austria - OECD.org · Notes Fisca l balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA)...

4
Government at a Glance 2017 Country Fact Sheet www.oecd.org/gov/govataglance.htm The fiscal deficit in Austria has decreased below the OECD average After experiencing a 5.4% deficit in 2009, fiscal consolidation has brought the deficit to 1.1% of GDP in 2015, while the OECD average deficit reached 2.8% of the GDP. This is also reflected by the state of the primary balance, which measures the overall balance excluding net interest payments on government debt, as it reached a surplus of 0.8% of GDP in 2015. In 2016, the deficit increased slightly to 1.6% of GDP and the primary balance fell to a surplus of 0.1% of GDP. However, the structural primary balance is expected to remain positive in 2017 and 2018. Chapter 2. Public finance and economics General government fiscal balance as a percentage of GDP General government primary balance and net interest spending as a percentage of GDP General government structural primary balance as a percentage of potential GDP General government projected structural primary balance as a percentage of potential GDP Austria has one of the most comprehensive performance budgeting frameworks among OECD countries The framework was introduced as part of far reaching budget reforms in 2013 which sought to improve budgetary decision-making. In particular, the reforms focussed on designing the federal budget as a compre- hensive steering instrument for resources, outputs and outcomes. These reforms are one of the reasons why, between 2011 and 2016 Austria improved the most on the OECD performance budgeting indicator among all OECD countries. Chapter 5. Budgeting practices and procedures Features of performance budgeting framework Use of performance budgeting practices at the central level of government The share of women occupying cabinet positions fell below OECD average Between 2015 and 2017 the share of women ministers in Austria decreased from 31% to 23%, while the av- erage among all OECD countries remained around 28%. During this period, the share of women parliamen- tarians in Austria remained above the OECD average, reaching 31% in 2017 while the OECD average was 29%. At the same time in the federal civil service 29% of senior civil servants are women, slightly below the OECD average of 33%. Chapter 3. Public employment and pay Share of women ministers Share of women parliamentarians and legislated gender quotas Share of public sector employment filled by women Austria

Transcript of Austria - OECD.org · Notes Fisca l balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA)...

Page 1: Austria - OECD.org · Notes Fisca l balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA) framework, also referred to as net lending (+) or net borrowing (-) of government,

Government at a Glance 2017

Country Fact Sheetwww.oecd.org/gov/govataglance.htm

The fiscal deficit in Austria has decreased below the OECD average

After experiencing a 5.4% deficit in 2009, fiscal consolidation has brought the deficit to 1.1% of GDP in 2015, while the OECD average deficit reached 2.8% of the GDP. This is also reflected by the state of the primary balance, which measures the overall balance excluding net interest payments on government debt, as it reached a surplus of 0.8% of GDP in 2015. In 2016, the deficit increased slightly to 1.6% of GDP and the primary balance fell to a surplus of 0.1% of GDP. However, the structural primary balance is expected to remain positive in 2017 and 2018.

Chapter 2. Public finance and economics

General government fiscal balance as a percentage of GDPGeneral government primary balance and net interest spending as a percentage of GDPGeneral government structural primary balance as a percentage of potential GDPGeneral government projected structural primary balance as a percentage of potential GDP

Austria has one of the most comprehensive performance budgeting frameworksamong OECD countries

The framework was introduced as part of far reaching budget reforms in 2013 which sought to improve budgetary decision-making. In particular, the reforms focussed on designing the federal budget as a compre-hensive steering instrument for resources, outputs and outcomes. These reforms are one of the reasons why, between 2011 and 2016 Austria improved the most on the OECD performance budgeting indicator among all OECD countries.

Chapter 5. Budgeting practices and procedures

Features of performance budgeting frameworkUse of performance budgeting practices at the central level of government

The share of women occupying cabinet positions fell below OECD average

Between 2015 and 2017 the share of women ministers in Austria decreased from 31% to 23%, while the av-erage among all OECD countries remained around 28%. During this period, the share of women parliamen-tarians in Austria remained above the OECD average, reaching 31% in 2017 while the OECD average was 29%. At the same time in the federal civil service 29% of senior civil servants are women, slightly below the OECD average of 33%.

Chapter 3. Public employment and pay

Share of women ministersShare of women parliamentarians and legislated gender quotasShare of public sector employment filled by women

Austria

Page 2: Austria - OECD.org · Notes Fisca l balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA) framework, also referred to as net lending (+) or net borrowing (-) of government,

Fiscal balance*(2015, 2016)

Government expenditures(2015, 2016)

Government gross debt*(2015)

% of GDP % of GDP % of GDP

Source: OECD National Accounts Source: OECD National Accounts

G@G /dataG@G /data

26134,500

88,70052,700

Middle Managers(D3 positions)

Senior Managers(D1 positions)

SeniorProfessionals

SecretarialPositions

2015USD PPP

150,000

300,000

450,000

231,500

50,400

Austria

94,600 121,200201,200

Annual compensation across central government positions (2015)

Government investment(2015, 2016)

How to read the figures:

Austria

Country value in blue (not represented if not available)

Average of OECD countries in red

Range of OECD country values in grey

Public Finance and Economics

10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

24.9%26.1%

Austria

20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

2015

40.9%

51.1%2016

51.7%2015

Austria

2015

3.2%

3.0%2016

3.0%2015

0% 2% 4% 6% 8%

Austria101.1% 100%

0%

100%

0%

Austria

112%

100% 150% 200% 250%50%0%

Values have been rounded. n.a. refers to

data not available

% of GDP

Public Employment

Source: OECD (2016) Survey on the Composition of the workforce in Central/federal Governments

Source: OECD (2016) Survey on the compensation of employees in central / federal governments

... and in senior positions (2015)

Source: OECD* SNA definition, see Notes National Accounts

Source: OECD* See Notes National Accounts

Public Sector Compensation

53.0%44.9%Austria

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

32.4%28.8%Austria

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Women in the civil service ...

Source: OECD (2016) Survey on the Composition of the workforce in Central/federal Governments

Percentage of central government employees aged 55 years or older

(2015)

General government employmentas % of total employment (2015)

18.1%

15.9%Austria

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Source: OECD National Accounts

-10% 0%-5% +5% +10%

-2.8%

Austria2016

-1.6% -1.1%

2015

2015

Page 3: Austria - OECD.org · Notes Fisca l balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA) framework, also referred to as net lending (+) or net borrowing (-) of government,

Budgeting

Women in Government

Extent of delegationof HRM practicesin line ministries

0.62 0.64

Extent of the useof performance

assessmentsin HR decisions

0.49

0.64

Extent of the useof performance

related pay

0.68

0.66

Use of separateHRM practices

for seniorcivil servants

0.65

0.55

Collectionof administrative

data

0.70 0.68

Composite indexfrom 0 lowest to 1 highest

0

0.25

0.50

0.75

1

Austria

G@G /data

Source: OECD (2016) Strategic Human Resources Management Survey

Composite indicators on HRM practices in central government (2016)

Human Resource Management

Composite indices on regulatory governance for primary laws*(2014)

G@G /data

Regulatory governance

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

29.1%

50%

26.1%

Austria

Source: OECD National Accounts

General governmentprocurement expenditures

(2015)% of government expenditures

* See Notes Source: OECD Indicators of Regulatory Policy and Governance (iREG)

Public Procurement

Support for greenpublic procurement

Some procuring entities have developed an internal strategy/policy

A strategy/policy has been developed at a central level

Support forSMEs

Support for innovativegoods and services

A strategy/policy has been rescinded

There has never been a strategy/policy in place

11 25 1 0 8 24 0 1 9 19 0 6

Austria

Strategic public procurement - Objectives(2016)

Source: OECD (2016) Survey on Public Procurement

0.41

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0.58Austria

Composite indexfrom 0 lowest to 1 highest

Performance budgetingpractices at the central level

of government (2016)

Source: OECD (2016) Survey of Performance Budgeting

Stakeholderengagement in

developing regulations

1.36

2.09

Regulatory ImpactAssessment for

developing regulations

2.50

2.05

Ex post evaluationof regulations

1.88

1.54

Composite indexfrom 0 lowest to 4 highest

0

1

2

3

4

Austria

Page 4: Austria - OECD.org · Notes Fisca l balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA) framework, also referred to as net lending (+) or net borrowing (-) of government,

Notes Fiscal balance as reported in the System of National Accounts (SNA) framework, also referred to as net lending (+) or net borrowing (-) of government, is calculated as total government revenues minus total government expenditures. Regulatory governance indicators: The results for stakeholder engagement and Regulatory Impact Assessment apply exclusively to processes for developing primary laws initiated by the executive. Data is not applicable to the United States, where all primary laws are initiated by Congress. In the majority of countries, most primary laws are initiated by the executive, except for Mexico and Korea, where a higher share of primary laws are initiated by parliament/congress (respectively 90.6% and 84%). Government gross debt is reported according to the SNA definition, which dif fers from the definition applied under the Maastricht Treaty. It is defined as all liabilities that require payment or payments of interest or principal by the debtor to the creditor at a date or dates in the future. All debt instruments are liabilities, but some liabilities such as shares, equity and financial derivatives are not debt.

Open Data Digital Government

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

35.6%33.0%

Austria

Individuals using the Internet for sending filled forms via public authorities websites

in the past 12 months (2016)

Source: OECD, ICT database; and Eurostat, Information Society database

OURdata Index:Open, Useful, Reusable Government Data

(2017)Composite index: from 0 lowest to 1 highest

Source: OECD (2017) Survey on Open Government Data

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.68

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.55

Austria

Dataavailability

Dataaccessibility

Governmentsupportto re-use

Differences in income inequality pre and post-taxand government transfers (2013)

Austria

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6Higher

inequality

Lowerinequality

Before After

0.50

0.28taxes and transfers

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Before After

0.47

0.32taxes and transfers

Higherinequality

Lowerinequality

Source: OECD Income Distribution Database

Limited government powers (2016)

0.75

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0.86Austria

Source: The World Justice Project

Core Government ResultsSatisfaction and confidence across public services

(2016)

70%

Judicial system Education system

88%20

40

60

80

100

Health care

67%72%55%68%

National government42%43%

Austria

Average

Range

Police77%86%

Source: Gallup World Poll

% of citizens expressing confidence/satisfaction

Government at a Glance 2017Government at a Glance provides readers with a dashboard of key indicators assembled with the goal of contributing to the analysis and international

comparison of public sector productivity and performance. Indicators on government revenues, expenditures, and employment are presented,

alongside key output and outcome data for education, health and justice. Information on key enablers to increase productivity including on digital

government, budget procedures, strategic human resource management, open government data and innovative practices are also included. In

a context of tight budget constraints in many member countries, good indicators are needed more than ever, in order to help governments make

informed decisions regarding resource allocation and to help restore confidence in government institutions.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2017-en

The Excel spreadsheets used to create the tables and figures in Government at a Glance 2017 are available via the StatLinks provided throughout the publication:

For more information on the data (including full methodology and figure notes)and to consult all other Country Fact Sheets: www.oecd.org/gov/govataglance.htm