Australian Government - data.daff.gov.audata.daff.gov.au/data/...mapping-workshop_proc_11.pdf ·...
Transcript of Australian Government - data.daff.gov.audata.daff.gov.au/data/...mapping-workshop_proc_11.pdf ·...
Workshop proceedings Canberra 23–24 November 2009
Jane Stewart, Jasmine Rickards, Vivienne Bordas, Lucy Randall and Richard Thackway
March 2011
Ground cover monitoring for Australia – establishing a
nationally coordinated approach to ground
cover mapping
Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Australian Government
www. aba r e s . g ov. a u
S c i e n c e a n d e c o n o m i c s f o r d e c i s i o n - m a k e r s
ii
© Commonwealth of Australia 2011
This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts or the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Executive Director, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES).
The Australian Government acting through ABARES has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, ABARES, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.
ISBN 978-1-921448-89-8
Stewart, JB, Rickards, JE, Bordas, VM, Randall LA and Thackway, RM 2011, Ground cover monitoring for Australia – establishing a coordinated approach to ground cover mapping: Workshop proceedings Canberra 23–24 November 2009, ABARES, Canberra, March.
Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences Postal address GPO Box 1563 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Switchboard +61 2 6272 2010 Facsimile +61 2 6272 2001 Email [email protected] Web abares.gov.au
ABARES project 43093
The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) was formed following the merger of the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) and the Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS) in 2010–11.
AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank all participants who presented and/or attended the Canberra workshop (23–24 November 2009), particularly for their support for a nationally coordinated approach to ground cover monitoring. This group has continued to contribute its expertise through on-line discussions, teleconferences and, now, project delivery. The activities established as a result of the workshop recommendations reflect the collaboration between State, Territory and Australian Government agencies undertaking ground cover monitoring. The authors thank John Leys and Michele Barson for their contribution to Appendix C and Tim McVicar for his contribution to Appendix D. The workshop and this report were funded by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.
Cover image: Chenopod shrublands, southern rangelands, South Australia (Rob Lesslie, ABARES).
iii
ContentsSummary 1
Acronyms and initialisms 2
1 Introduction 3
2 Options for monitoring ground cover using remote sensing 6
3 Methods to calibrate and validate remotely sensed ground cover 10
4 A coordinated approach for ground cover mapping 12
5 Working group objectives 13
Working group 1: Fractional cover mapping operational for the nation 13Working group 2: Upscaling 13Working group 3: Field data collection 14Working group 4: Monitoring land management practices with remote sensing 14
6 Workshop recommendations 15
Working group 1: Fractional cover mapping operational for the nation 15Working group 2: Upscaling 15Working group 3: Field data collection 17Working group 4: Monitoring land management practices with remote sensing 19
7 Implementing the workshop recommendations 21
Appendixes A Workshop presentations 26
B Workshop participants 27
C Remote sensing specifications for monitoring ground cover nationally 29
D Remotely sensed examples of upscaling 34
E SLATS generic site data form 36
References 42
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
iv
Tables1 Key tasks to deliver an operational remotely sensed fractional cover nationally
(2010–2013) 22
2 Key tasks in the validation of remotely sensed fractional cover (2010–2013) 24
Figures1 The importance of ground cover in minimising (a) water erosion and (b) wind erosion 4
2 Theoretical basis of the Guerschman et al. (2009) algorithm considers the spectral characteristics of photosynthetic vegetation (chlorophyll at 600–800 nanometres), non-photosynthetic vegetation (cellulose and lignin at 2000–2200 nanometres) and bare soil quantified by the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the cellulose absorption index (CAI). 7
3 The four working groups and their relationship to each other for delivery of nationally coordinated ground cover mapping 12
4 Layout of transects used in Queensland’s Statewide Landcover and Trees Study (SLATS) modified discrete point sampling method for measuring fractional cover in (a) pastoral environments and (b) agricultural crops sown in lines 17
5 A remotely sensed upscaling method to spatially extend data beyond the isolated field measurement sites 34
Boxes1 Cover and remote sensing 5
2 Characterisation of satellite remote sensing systems 6
3 Upscaling 14
4 Calibration and validation of remotely sensed data 18
Maps1 Results from the 2007–08 ARM Survey showing graziers with a minimum ground
cover target 4
2 Mean fractional vegetation cover for 2000–2009 8
3 Dry season ground cover and foliage projective cover (FPC) for the Fox Creek sub-catchment within the Burdekin catchment, Queensland, in 2002 using Landsat and MODIS imagery 9
4 Frequency of flag classes for 2000–2008 in the MODIS-based fractional cover of Guerschman et al. (2009) indicating algorithm performance 16
5 Existing monitoring sites indicating those that have measured ground cover using the SLATS method 20
6 Agricultural non-woody areas of the rangelands are where the MODIS-based fractional cover of Guerschman et al. (2009) is required first for monitoring 21
1
SummaryGround cover is the vegetation, biological crusts and stones in contact with the soil surface. It has a significant impact on the amount of soil redistributed or lost through wind and water erosion, on the biomass which contributes to soil carbon levels and the ability of vegetation to respond to rain after drought. Ground cover can be monitored directly through remote sensing.
A workshop was held in Canberra (23–24 November 2009) to reach consensus on a nationally coordinated approach to ground cover mapping. Different approaches were presented for estimating ground cover using remote sensing. The issues surrounding validation of such remotely sensed products were also discussed. Discussions were guided by the user specifications for this product.
A first step in this coordinated approach was the establishment of four working groups from the workshop participants. The working groups are:
1 fractional cover mapping operational for the nation—using the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) at 500-metre spatial resolution as a 16-day composite
2 upscaling—from field data to high/medium resolution, small extent imagery to low resolution, large area imagery
3 field data collection—for validation of fractional cover derived from remote sensing
4 monitoring land management practices with remote sensing.
Collectively, the four working groups will advise on the delivery of a validated fractional cover product for Australia. This product will be used:
• to monitor ground cover levels• as a key input to wind and water erosion modelling to predict rates of soil loss• to monitor the impact of different management practices on ground cover levels and soil
erosion risk.
The method of Guerschman et al. (2009) has been selected as the approach to implement nationally, with initial focus on making this MODIS-based fractional cover product operational. Essential to the use of this product is the accuracy of its ground cover estimates. The collection of field measurements and the use of upscaling techniques will underpin the validation and improvement of this fractional cover product.
The working groups documented the workshop discussion and have recommended a way forward. The effort required to implement the suggested tasks has been estimated and will be used to inform the development of a project plan. Progress on the project is available on the Caring for our Country website: http://www.nrm.gov.au/publications/factsheets/ground-cover-factsheet.html.
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
2
Acronyms and initialisms
ABARES Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics
ACLUMP Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program
ACRIS Australian Collaborative Rangeland Information System
ALUM Australian Land Use and Management (Classification)
ARM Agricultural Resource Management (Survey)
AVHRR Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer
BG / BS Bare ground / bare soil
BRDF Bidirectional reflectance distribution function
BRS Bureau of Rural Sciences
CAI Cellulose absorption index
CEMSYS Computational Environmental Management System
CEOS Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
CMIS CSIRO Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics
CLW CSIRO Land and Water
CMA Catchment Management Authority
CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
DAFF Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Australian Government)
DECCW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (New South Wales)
DERM Department of Environment and Resource Management (Queensland)
EVI Enhanced vegetation index
GCI Ground cover index
GA Geoscience Australia
GRDC Grains Research and Development Corporation
IDL Interactive Data Language
LAI Leaf area index
LUMIS Land Use and Management Information System
MCAS-S Multi-Criteria Analysis Shell for Spatial decision support
MODIS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
NBAR Nadir (directly below sensor) BRDF-Adjusted Reflectance
NCLUMI National Committee for Land Use and Management Information
NCST National Committee on Soil and Terrain
NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
NRM Natural resource management
NLWRA National Land and Water Resources Audit
NPV Non-photosynthetic vegetation
PV Photosynthetic vegetation
RUSLE Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation
SLATS Statewide Landcover And Trees Study (Queensland)
TERN Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
USGS United States Geological Survey
1
3
A target of the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country program is to improve the condition of the soil resource through adoption of better land management practices. Ground cover is a good indicator of management and its impact on soil condition (figure 1). Through the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ Agricultural Resource Management (ARM) Survey, data are collected on ground cover management such as tillage and stubble practices, how ground cover levels are monitored and minimum ground cover level targets for grazed paddocks (for example, map 1). These data are used for intermediate outcome reporting for Caring for our Country on sustainable practices. A suitable remotely sensed product of ground cover would enable ground cover levels to be directly monitored consistently for Australia over months, seasons and years. Such a product would give trends in ground cover levels complementing the ARM Survey and as an input to wind and water erosion, soil carbon and acidification models enabling forecasting. Ideally, this remotely sensed product would distinguish between the living and dry/dead vegetation and bare soil—a fractional ground cover product.
A workshop was held in Canberra (23–24 November 2009) to reach consensus on a nationally coordinated approach to ground cover mapping. Appendix A lists the presentations given to inform discussion on different methods and validation of such remotely sensed products. Workshop participants represented potential collaborators and users of a remotely sensed ground cover product (Appendix B). With limited resourcing, a collaborative approach will be important for achieving success. The adopted approach and delivered national product must thus seek to meet partners’ needs—those of the Australian Government, state and territory governments and others.
Specifications of a remotely sensed product for monitoring ground cover nationally were provided to workshop participants to focus discussions. These specifications are given in Appendix C. In summary, a national fractional cover product is required at monthly intervals (at 500 to 1000-metre resolution) supported by a yearly woody layer and a yearly or seasonal medium (30-metre) resolution layer. A high priority to validate the selected remotely sensed product/s is a network of reference sites where the method used to measure fractional cover is sensor-independent. A staged approach is required to deliver a national remotely sensed ground cover product, considering user needs, image acquisition and storage costs and availability of existing suitable or adaptable methodologies.
Introduction
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
4
The importance of ground cover in minimising (a) water erosion and (b) wind erosion
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
20 40 60 80 100
(a) water erosion (b) wind erosion
ground cover (%)ground cover (%)
aver
age
annu
al s
oil l
oss
(t/h
a)
soil
tran
spor
t rat
e (g
/m/s
)
1
0 20 40 60 80 100
Note: Threshold levels are indicated as green for low risk, orange for medium risk and red for high risk of soil erosion.Source: Barson and Leys, workshop presentation.
Results from the 2007–08 ARM Survey showing graziers with a minimumground cover targetm
ap
1
yes – have a target
graziers with a minimum ground cover target (%)
no – do not have a targetnumber of graziers reported in an NRM region1,123
Note: Sixty-nine per cent of graziers monitored ground cover in 2007–08. Fifty-seven per cent of these graziers had a minimum ground cover target of 40 per cent to more than 80 per cent (ABS 2009).Source: Barson and Leys, workshop presentation.
5
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
box 1 Cover and remote sensing
Land cover is the physical surface of the earth, including various combinations of vegetation types, soils, exposed rocks and water bodies. Land cover classes may be discriminated by characteristic patterns using remote sensing. Land cover is distinct from land use. Land use is how humans use the land, for example for urban and agricultural land uses.
Fractional cover is the fraction of an area (usually a pixel for the purposes of remote sensing) that is covered by a specific cover type such as green or photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation (that is, stubble, senescent herbage and leaf litter) or bare soil/rock. Areas that have been burnt resulting in ash/blackened soil are considered as a bare soil cover type.
Ground cover is the vegetation (living and dead), biological crusts and stone that is in contact with the soil surface. Non-woody ground cover such as crops, grass, forbs and chenopod-type shrubs may change monthly, making this component a good indicator of land management performance (Leys et al. 2009). Ground cover is a sub-component of land cover and, from a remote sensing perspective, is the fractional cover of the non-woody understorey.
6
2Box 1 defines ground cover and fractional cover in terms of remote sensing. A remotely sensed fractional cover product considers all vegetative cover—woody and non-woody at the different strata—ground, mid, upper and emergent (as defined in NCST 2009). To achieve a ground cover product, the fractional cover for non-woody vegetation within the ground strata (usually less than 2 metres tall) is of interest only. This requires a woody cover layer to mask the fractional cover product in those areas under woodlands and forests where it is difficult to extract ground cover. Such a woody layer is produced annually by some states for reporting of tree clearing and nationally for the National Carbon Accounting System by the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) has recently tried unmixing Landsat pixels to provide cover estimates under canopies; however, this requires validation and further research.
box 2 Characterisation of satellite remote sensing systems
Different remote sensing satellite systems have diverse spatial, temporal and spectral resolutions.
Spatial resolution specifies the pixel size of satellite images covering the earth’s surface.
• High spatial resolution: 0.6–4 metres
• Medium spatial resolution: 4–30 metres (for example, Landsat)
• Low spatial resolution: 30 – >1000 metres (for example, MODIS)
Temporal resolution specifies the revisiting frequency of a satellite sensor for a specific location.
• High temporal resolution: < 24 hours – 3 days (for example, MODIS)
• Medium temporal resolution: 4–16 days (for example, Landsat)
• Low spatial resolution: > 16 days
Spectral resolution specifies the number of spectral bands in which the sensor can collect reflected radiance. Another important aspect of spectral resolution is the position of the bands in the electromagnetic spectrum.
• High spectral resolution: 16–220 bands
• Medium spectral resolution: 3–15 bands (for example, Landsat and MODIS for bands related to land properties)
• Low spectral resolution: < 3 bands
Owing to technical constraints, satellite remote sensing systems can only offer a high spatial resolution with a medium or low spectral resolution, and vice versa. For different applications it is necessary to find compromises between the different resolutions or to use alternative methods of data acquisition.Source: Satellite Imaging Corporation, http://www.satimagingcorp.com/characterization-of-satellite-remote-sensing-systems.html.
Options for monitoring ground cover using remote sensing
7
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil have different spectral responses. These spectral responses can be used to select these components using remote sensing. Figure 2 illustrates how the algorithm of Guerschman et al. (2009) can extract the different fractional components. The ratio of MODIS band 7 to band 6 correlates negatively with the cellulose absorption index (CAI) and can be used with the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to resolve the vegetation fractional cover with MODIS. The University of Adelaide also uses MODIS bands 6 and 7 to predict the cover rating from South Australia’s windscreen surveys. Both methods require independent field-based fractional cover data for calibration and validation of the derived MODIS-based products.
The algorithm of Guerschman et al. (2009) was developed for the northern savannas of Australia and applied nationally. The data are available as a 16-day composite on an 8-day phased production at 500-metre spatial resolution from 2000 onward (http://www- data.wron.csiro.au/remotesensing/MODIS/products/Guerschman_etal_RSE2009/; map 2).
The University of Adelaide’s index has been developed for South Australia’s agricultural lands and is not currently available nationally or publicly. Future developments include the use of fractional cover indices from relative spectral mixture analysis (Clarke et al. 2010).
Geoscience Australia (GA) and ABARES have developed a 250-metre Dynamic Land Cover Map (Lymburner et al. 2010) for Australia, which is due for public release in early 2011. This characterises the enhanced vegetation index time series to obtain statistics, phenology and seasonality factors on photosynthetic vegetation. GA aims to link the fractional vegetation cover product of Guerschman et al. (2009) to the Dynamic Land Cover Map to enable interpretation of trends in vegetative cover (separating photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic vegetation) under different land cover types.
DERM uses Landsat (and MODIS) to provide an annual ground cover index for all of Queensland (map 3). A Landsat-based (30-metre) woody vegetation cover product is also produced annually. DERM is moving toward a Landsat ground cover product which separates
Theoretical basis of the Guerschman et al. (2009)algorithm considers the spectral characteristics ofphotosynthetic vegetation (chlorophyll at 600–800nanometres), non-photosynthetic vegetation(cellulose and lignin at 2000–2200 nanometres)and bare soil quanti�ed by the Normalised Di�erenceVegetation Index (NDVI) and the celluloseabsorption index (CAI)
non-photosynthetic vegetation
photosyntheticvegetation
bare soil
CA
I
NDVI
2
Source: Guerschman, workshop presentation.
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
8
the three fractional components (photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil), and is currently considering the accuracy and operational efficiencies of three approaches: (i) a regression-based bare ground prediction, (ii) multiple logistic regression algorithms and (iii) a spectral unmixing approach (Schmidt et al. 2010a). With free access to the United States Geological Survey Landsat image archive back to 2000, Queensland is acquiring imagery to enable time series analysis (for example, Scarth et al. 2010) within years (of up to 20 images per year) as well as their current annual end of dry season time series back to before 2000.
Airborne hyperspectral data are useful for mapping non-photosynthetic vegetation and the types of bare soil/rock, as they are not influenced by variation in soil moisture as multispectral sensors such as Landsat and MODIS are. Airborne hyperspectral data are available now but at a cost of approximately $15 million for a 15-metre baseline map of Australia. From 2013, hyperspectral soil products will become routinely accessible to Australia. CSIRO Exploration & Mining’s 10-year vision is web-accessible hyperspectral mineral maps of the Australian continent for baseline mapping and monitoring.
Mean fractional vegetation cover for 2000–2009
map
2
100%NPV
100%BS
100%PV
Note: PV = photosynthetic vegetation, NPV = non-photosynthetic vegetation, BS = bare soil.Source: Guerschman, workshop presentation.
9
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Points to consider for monitoring ground cover using remote sensing are:
• climate is a major cover driver• the spatial arrangement of cover—often linked to management factors— is lost with
increasing pixel size• soil moisture has an effect on remotely sensed ground cover estimates—particularly
multispectral (that is, Landsat and MODIS) estimates of non-photosynthetic vegetation versus bare soil
• atmospheric correction is essential for time series remotely sensed data• remotely sensed estimates need to be validated with accurate on-ground measurement.
Box 2 summarises how different remote sensing systems are characterised by their spatial, temporal and spectral resolutions, and indicates where the current options (Landsat and MODIS) used for large extent monitoring of ground cover align.
Dry season ground cover and foliage projective cover (FPC) for the FoxCreek sub-catchment within the Burdekin catchment, Queensland,in 2002 using Landsat and MODIS imagery
map
3Fox CreekCatchment 2002– Landsat
Fox CreekCatchment 2002– MODIS
property boundarieshigh ground cover %low ground cover %above 20% FPC
Note: At low (< 40 per cent) ground cover levels information is lost at the 500-metre spatial resolution of MODIS.Source: Schmidt, workshop presentation.
10
3A remotely sensed fractional ground cover product requires field data to validate the reliability of the product. Various methods are available to collect fractional cover in the field and the accuracy of these methods can and should be assessed. For example, the methods used for grassland curing assessments (that is, the non-photosynthetic vegetation fraction) by the Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre have an accuracy of +/– 10 per cent for the Levy Rod method and +/– 20 per cent for visual estimates. DERM uses a modified discrete point transect sampling method in their SLATS program (Scarth et al. 2006; Schmidt et al. 2010b) (see figure 4). Automated in situ sensors are also another option for collecting multi-spectral data that can be converted to the three fractional ground cover components.
The Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) is currently establishing a national network of sites for calibration and validation of remotely sensed products supported by its AusCover nodes. Measurements proposed for these sites are:
• canopy multispectral reflectance (nadir or bidirectional)• leaf spectra (reflectance and transmittance)• background nadir spectral reflectance (soil and litter)• fraction of areal vegetation cover• vegetation crown allometry (height, width, gap)• phenology (green-up, mature, and senescent stages)• vegetation composition (either by species or structural type)• moisture status• fraction of non-photosynthesising vegetation• meteorological data.
Collaboration with the TERN initiative will provide access to high spectral reflectance measurements at known sites and, potentially, the required measurements for validating the selected remotely sensed ground cover product. Agreement on standards for measurements at sites will be important for effective linkage between the TERN and this national ground cover project.
TERN will draw on lessons learnt from international validation programs and encourage the use of:
• representative sites• homogenous or constantly mixed and large (preferably at least 5 kilometres by 5 kilometres)
sites
Methods to calibrate and validate remotely sensed ground cover
11
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Methods to calibrate and validate remotely sensed ground cover • a hierarchy from highly instrumented supersites to networks of spatially extensive higher
order plots • high spatial resolution images to bridge to coarser resolution images• autonomous highly instrumented supersites for calibration and validation.
Box 4 provides internationally recognised definitions for calibration and validation.
Some initial validation of the Guerschman et al. (2010) MODIS-based fractional cover product have been undertaken by Schmidt et al. (2010b) and G Bastin ([CSIRO] 2009, pers. comm., September). Analysis of the algorithm’s performance using the flag classes (see map 4) also indicates where the product is currently working and where improvement is required. These types of analyses can assist with establishing sites for calibrating, validating and ultimately improving the selected remotely sensed product to provide ground cover estimates of known reliability.
12
4To coordinate national delivery of ground cover mapping, four working groups were established from the workshop participants. The working groups are:
1 fractional cover mapping operational for the nation—initially using MODIS
2 upscaling—from field data to high/medium resolution, small extent imagery to low resolution, large area imagery
3 field data collection—for validation of fractional cover derived from remote sensing
4 monitoring land management practices with remote sensing.
Collectively, the four working groups will advise on the delivery of a validated fractional cover product for Australia. Figure 3 illustrates the interconnections between the four working groups. Appendix B shows the membership to each of the working groups by workshop participants.
The four working groups and their relationship to each other for delivery of nationally coordinatedground cover mapping
1
2
3 4
MODIS-based fractionalcover mapping
operational nationally
upscaling
field data collection monitoring landmanagement practices
3
A coordinated approach for ground cover mapping
13
5The overarching objectives of the working groups are:
1 validation of an operational fractional cover product
2 ongoing improvement of this product
3 analysis of ground cover estimates from this product.
Each working group’s strategy will have as its priority an operational product available in 2010, with ongoing validation and improvement of that product over the term of Caring for our Country (2010–2013). The data collected for the current product validation ideally should be non-sensor specific to allow for production of a finer resolution product when feasible. This should also apply to the algorithms used in upscaling and production of the fractional cover.
The working groups will seek to be actively involved in the progress of related activities under the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) AusCover (that is, related to calibration and validation of their land products) and identify potential opportunities for co-investment.
Working group 1: Fractional cover mapping operational for the nationThe purpose of working group 1 is to make remotely sensed fractional cover products for Australia operational. The initial focus will be the MODIS-based fractional cover product of Guerschman et al. (2009). This working group will seek to improve the existing product by:
• establishing where the existing algorithm does and does not work to inform stratification for locating sites to obtain field data
• using field data to further train the algorithm and validate the product• revising the Interactive Data Language (IDL) algorithm.
Working group 2: UpscalingThe purpose of working group 2 is to develop a strategy for upscaling (box 3) from field data to remotely sensed imagery to produce a MODIS-based fractional cover product.
This involves:
• determining the technical details of the optimal upscaling algorithm• advising on the sampling framework for location of field sites• advising on the timing of field data collection to be sufficiently co-incident with sensor/s
overpass.
Working group objectives
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
14
box 3 Upscaling
Upscaling is a way of taking information based in observations that have a small spatial (or temporal) domain and extending that domain to a larger geographic area (or time period). Crossing a resolution (or scale) boundary is a key feature of upscaling and is what distinguishes upscaling from aggregation (which is the process of combining data from smaller sub-regions). The dates of field work and image acquisition cannot be too far apart or else the characteristic being measured and estimated remotely may have changed (T McVicar [CSIRO] 2009, pers. comm., December).
Examples of upscaling techniques of vegetation characteristics relevant to this project include McVicar et al. (1996a,b), Milne et al. (2007) and Guerschman et al. (2009). These techniques are outlined in Appendix D.
Working group 3: Field data collectionThe purpose of working group 3 is to validate remotely sensed fractional cover products for the purpose of monitoring ground cover levels.
This involves:
• agreeing on field methods for measuring ground cover (national standard)• prioritising where to locate sites to measure ground cover• agreeing on the timing and frequency of measurement at a site• coordinating parties collecting field data, managing data and providing feedback.
Working group 4: Monitoring land management practices with remote sensingThe purpose of working group 4 is to develop a monitoring framework for ground cover management practices using remotely sensed fractional cover. In the mixed farming or cropping zone, this includes:
• advising on the sampling framework for location of field sites so key management practices (and land uses) are considered
• advising on the frequency and timing of field data collection of ground cover levels to capture the sequence of management practices for a site
• developing the metrics to interpret fractional cover time series for selected management practices (for example, timing and length of cultivated fallow, removal or retention of crop residues, timing and number of tillage passes, grazing pressure and practice, perennial pasture content, and conversion of continuously low productivity areas to perennial vegetation).
This working group will build on and seek to implement the recommendations of Stewart and Rickards (2010), focusing on selected sites in the cropping/mixed farming zone to complement the data collected through the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ Agricultural Resource Management Survey.
15
6Workshop recommendations
The key recommendations from the workshop are listed below, under the four working groups.
Working group 1: Fractional cover mapping operational for the nation• Use the method of Guerschman et al. (2009) to produce a fractional cover product
for Australia as 500-metre 16-day composites of bare soil, photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic vegetative cover derived from MODIS imagery.
• Automate the delivery of this fractional cover product to allow updating every four days.• Provide caveats on the use and limitations of the dataset.• Seek to improve the dataset with further validation using:
– flag analysis to identify areas where validation data are required (for example, map 4)– existing suitable site data available from state agencies (in particular the Queensland
Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) and NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW))
– new site data collected by state agencies, Geoscience Australia (GA), CSIRO and others (for example, the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC)).
• Upscale from site data to Landsat and then to MODIS imagery. This is a more cost-effective and feasible way to collect field data and allows development of two ground cover products in tandem.
• Determine product accuracy (aiming for ±10–20 per cent error). Need to consider:
– improving discrimination of low ground cover levels—those less than 50 per cent– estimating area at risk—whether overestimation or underestimation is better when
targeting regions.
Working group 2: UpscalingA successful upscaling strategy should be ensured through implementing the following protocols.
• Ensure field sites are accurately located using differential GPS technology.• Ensure field data are collected using Queensland’s Statewide Landcover And Trees Study
(SLATS) modified discrete point sampling method along 100-metre transects:
– for pastoral environments using the star-shaped transect approach of Scarth et al. (2006)– for intensive agricultural environments with linearly sowed crops using the cross-transect
method of Schmidt et al. (2010b) (figure 4).• Ensure field crews are trained by DERM in the use of the SLATS modified discrete point
sampling method—this is the agreed minimum national specifications for field data.
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
16
• Ensure field data are stored in a spatially enabled relational database that is compatible with the current Queensland PostGIS database (http://postgis.refractions.net/) to quickly generate a national database.
• Locate field sites in both homogenous herbaceous land covers and in more heterogeneous tree-shrub-grass mixed systems. Within a field site the land cover needs to be fairly homogenous and representative of wider conditions.
• Design the field work strategy to cover a wide range of soil colours (for example, white kaolinite clays, black cracking clays, red desert sands and yellow earths). Focus on collecting data for the various natural and agricultural systems in jurisdictions other than Queensland (because of their extensive SLATS field sites), with the exception of the black clays of central-western Queensland.
• Assess the impact of soil colour to improve the MODIS fractional cover product based on Guerschman et al. (2009) by having coincident at selected sites:
– field collection using the SLATS modified discrete point sampling method– field level spectral radiometric observations—using a portable spectroradiometer
(available from Analytical Spectral Devices Inc.)– Hyperion imagery—with the exact location specified before tasking this pointable
hyperspectral sensor.
Frequency of �ag classes for 2000–2008 in the MODIS-based fractional cover of Guerschman et al. (2009) indicating algorithm performance
map
4
class 0 class 1
class 2 class 255
less than 20%20% – 40%40% – 60%60% – 80%more than 80%
Note: Class 0: pixel processed normally, unmixing unconstrained; Class 1: unmixing partially constrained, fractional coverestimated; Class 2: unmixing constrained and fractional cover not estimated; Class 255: MODIS NBAR data not available.Source: Randall, workshop presentation.
17
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Working group 3: Field data collectionIn addition to the recommendations of the upscaling working group:• Adopt the definitions of the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Working
Group on Calibration and Validation for validation and their validation hierarchy (box 4).• Establish the relationship between monitoring ground cover obliquely and from overhead.
This may allow use of existing obliquely viewed field measurements of ground cover (that is, windscreen surveys). Forward (2009) indicates there are more than 8130 sites from windscreen surveys in cropping and rangelands environments representing most jurisdictions that potentially could be used, also providing historical data (for example, South Australian data back to 1999–2000, and Victorian Mallee and Western Australian data back to 2007).
• Undertake a review of ‘human variability’ and its effect on the measurement of ground cover in the field for both rangelands and cropping. There is significant literature addressing this issue, particularly for the rangelands. This should underpin the adoption of the selected field method/s and its accuracy.
• Make minor modification to the SLATS generic site data form (Appendix E) to align with national standards for soil and land surveys (NCST 2009).
• Develop a statistically robust sampling framework that is representative of land uses and soil colours/types. The MCAS-S software tool (BRS 2009) could be used to prioritise where to collect ground cover measurements within this sampling framework.
Layout of transects used in Queensland’s Statewide Landcover and Trees Study (SLATS) modi�ed discrete point sampling method for measuring fractional coverin (a) pastoral environments and (b) agricultural crops sown in lines
60°
100m 100m
N
4(a) star-shaped transect (b) cross-shaped transect
45°
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
18
• Adopt a stratified approach for the sampling framework. Determine whether one approach is suitable nationally or different approaches can be accommodated considering existing approaches. Examples include:
– soil condition monitoring that is based on monitoring regions (broad landscape divisions based on physiographic regions), monitoring units (a combination of major soil types and land uses) and monitoring sites (locations within units where repeat sampling occurs using a 25-metre grid approach)
– the Victorian primary production landscapes– stratification for the rangelands (under TERN).
• Establish a central registry of monitoring sites from all disciplines. This would require a champion organisation to bring together the disciplines and activities. The initial focus of this registry would be the sites identified in existing state monitoring programs that are relevant to ground cover and in particular aligned with the SLATS methodology (such an assessment has been undertaken by NCLUMI through the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP)—map 5).
box 4 Calibration and validation of remotely sensed data
Calibration is the process of quantitatively defining the system responses to known, controlled signal outputs (that is, sensor radiometric and geometric performance, and stability).
Vicarious calibration refers to techniques that make use of natural or artificial sites on the earth’s surface for the post-launch calibration of sensors.
Training refers to the process of developing and refining an algorithm designed to produce a specific data product from the system outputs.
Validation is the process of assessing, by independent means, the quality of the data products derived from the system outputs (that is, comparison and scaling of remotely sensed derived biophysical products versus in situ measurements). Validation is undertaken in four stages:
• Stage 1 validation: Product accuracy is assessed from a small (typically less than 30) set of locations and time periods by comparison with in situ or other suitable reference data.
• Stage 2 validation: Product accuracy is estimated over a significant set of locations and time periods by comparison with reference in situ or other suitable reference data. Spatial and temporal consistency of the product and consistency with similar products has been evaluated over globally representative locations and time periods. Results are published in the peer-reviewed literature.
• Stage 3 validation: Uncertainties in the product and its associated structure are well quantified from comparison with reference in situ or other suitable reference data. Uncertainties are characterised in a statistically robust way over multiple locations and time periods representing global conditions. Spatial and temporal consistency of the product and consistency with similar products has been evaluated over globally representative locations and periods. Results are published in the peer-reviewed literature.
• Stage 4 validation: Validation results for stage 3 are systematically updated when new product versions are released and as the time series expands.
The definitions for calibration, vicarious calibration and validation are adopted from the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Working Group on Calibration and Validation (www.ceos.org/wgcv). The validation stages are from the guidelines for the CEOS Hierarchy of Validation (updated October 2009, available at http://lpvs.gsfc.nasa.gov/).
19
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
• Ensure that the field campaign implemented considers the seasons and overpasses of the satellite. Field measurements should at a minimum be twice per year, at the end of the wet and dry seasons, to correspond with maximum and minimum levels of cover.
Working group 4: Monitoring land management practices with remote sensing• Modify the Queensland SLATS generic site data form (Appendix E) to include land
management practices. • Seek to standardise practice terminology for consistency with other monitoring programs
(for example, windscreen/roadside surveys for erosion risk). Ideally this should align with the activities under the National Committee for Land Use and Management Information (NCLUMI)—namely the Australian Land Use and Management (ALUM) Classification and categories of the Land Use and Management Information System (LUMIS).
• Gather information required on the timing of land management practices throughout the year to assist in the interpretation of remotely sensed fractional cover time series. This could be achieved by:
– providing a confidence estimate for the area represented by generalised ‘calendars of operations’ collected for natural resource management regions by the NCLUMI through ACLUMP
– coordinating with other monitoring programs which collect information on land management practices multiple times per year (for example, windscreen surveys (SA, NSW, WA), Victorian Mallee survey) at known locations to be coincident with sensor overpass
– compiling ‘paddock diaries’ of field operations (including stocking rates and weather events) at sites with the assistance of land managers using standardised terminology
– visiting field sites at key changes in ground cover levels because of management practices to measure ground cover.
• Align management practices collected with those of the ABS Agricultural Resource Management Survey, with a focus on ground cover related practices.
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
20
Existing monitoring sites indicating those that have measured groundcover using the SLATS methodm
ap
5
ground cover measured using SLATS methodsite suitability characteristics
ground cover measured using other quantitative methodground cover not measured but possible
Source: Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program from data supplied by state and territory agencies.
21
7 Implementing the workshop recommendations
Tables 1 and 2 outline the steps and estimates of the effort required to implement the recom-mendations of the working groups for a nationally coordinated approach to ground cover mapping using remote sensing. With a limited budget, the Department of Agriculture, Fisher-ies and Forestry (DAFF) has identified the extensive grazing systems of the rangelands (Bastin et al. 2008) as the focus for initial monitoring (map 6). The rangelands contain most of the areas where wind erosion is widespread (see http://www.nrm.gov.au/business-plan/10-11/priorities/sustainable/pubs/map-2-4-2.pdf) and where data is required to improve estimates of hillslope erosion by water (see http://www.nrm.gov.au/business-plan/10-11/priorities/sustainable/pubs/map-2-4-4.pdf). Priority will be given to those tasks that will most improve the MODIS-based fractional cover product for monitoring within the rangelands. The mixed farming or intensive land use zone will be considered for limited sites only to assist in national validation of the frac-tional cover product. The Caring for our Country website (http://www.nrm.gov.au) will provide progress on the implementation of these recommendations, within the available resources.
Agricultural non-woody areas of the rangelands are where theMODIS-based fractional cover of Guerschman et al. (2009) is required �rst for monitoring
map
6
rangeland boundary
NRM regions
forests, woodlands and plantations
agricultural land uses
non-agricultural land uses
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
22
1 Ke
y ta
sks
to d
eliv
er a
n op
erat
iona
l rem
otel
y se
nsed
frac
tiona
l cov
er n
atio
nally
(201
0–20
13)
le
ad o
rgan
isat
ion
estim
ate
ofta
sk
and
part
ners
tim
efra
me
effor
t req
uire
d co
mm
ents
1. A
utom
ate
del
iver
y of
CSI
RO’s
MO
DIS
-bas
ed
GA
, CSI
RO (C
LW)
4–5
mon
ths
afte
r G
A 0
.5 F
TE
Exp
erim
enta
l pro
duc
t
frac
tion
al c
over
pro
duc
t (v
ersi
on 0
) a
p
roje
ct in
itia
tion
a
CSI
RO 0
.5 F
TE
Lim
ited
val
idat
ion
• usi
ng G
A’s
NBA
R d
ata
and
the
alg
orit
hm o
f
Del
iver
ed t
hrou
gh
GA
’s w
ebsi
te a
nd/
G
uers
chm
an e
t al
. (20
09)
or
TER
N/A
usC
over
• p
rod
uct
is u
pd
ated
eve
ry fo
ur d
ays
on 1
6-d
ay
U
sers
exp
erie
nces
and
cav
eats
to
be
500
-met
re c
omp
osit
es
p
rovi
ded
• pro
duc
t d
isti
ngui
shes
bar
e so
il, n
on-p
hoto
synt
heti
c
A
sses
smen
t of
GA
’s an
d C
SIRO
’s a
nd p
hoto
synt
heti
c ve
get
atio
n
q
ualit
y co
ntro
l of N
BAR
pro
duc
t an
d• i
nclu
des
flag
dat
a (in
dic
atio
n of
relia
bili
ty o
f cov
er
p
roce
ssin
g e
stim
ate)
• inc
lud
es m
etad
ata
and
doc
umen
tati
on
2. U
nder
take
ass
essm
ent
of C
SIRO
’s M
OD
IS-b
ased
G
A, C
SIRO
(CLW
) O
ngoi
ng
GA
0.2
5 FT
E C
onti
nuou
s im
pro
vem
ent
of M
OD
IS
fr
acti
onal
cov
er p
rod
uct
cons
ider
ing
: D
ERM
and
oth
er s
tate
(TER
N fu
nded
) fr
acti
onal
cov
er p
rod
uct
• rob
ustn
ess
of t
he a
lgor
ithm
– is
it a
pp
rop
riat
e to
ag
enci
es t
o p
rovi
de
C
SIRO
?
Stat
e ag
enci
es t
o p
rovi
de
exis
ting
ap
ply
nat
iona
lly o
r ar
e m
odifi
cati
ons
req
uire
d fo
r
field
dat
a
fie
ld d
ata
diff
eren
t la
ndsc
apes
?
DER
M t
o p
rovi
de
thei
r G
CI a
lgor
ithm
• sp
ectr
al c
hara
cter
isti
cs –
sou
ndne
ss o
f con
tras
t of
for
MO
DIS
imag
ery
ban
ds
6 an
d 7
(aff
ecte
d b
y so
il m
oist
ure
and
soi
l
Coo
rdin
atio
n ro
le fo
r A
CRI
S w
ith
col
our)
rang
elan
d ju
risd
icti
ons
• oth
er u
nmix
ing
mod
els
e.g.
DER
M’s
grou
nd c
over
ind
ex (G
CI)
• exi
stin
g d
atas
ets
avai
lab
le t
o te
st a
lgor
ithm
e.g.
GC
I and
SLA
TS d
ata
3. R
elea
se a
n im
pro
ved
ver
sion
of C
SIRO
’s
CSI
RO (C
LW),
GA
To
be
advi
sed
G
A 0
.25
FTE
M
inim
ise
unce
rtai
nty
in t
he 4
0–60
MO
DIS
-bas
ed fr
acti
onal
cov
er p
rod
uct
(ver
sion
1)
(d
epen
ds
on fi
eld
C
SIRO
?
per
cen
t gr
ound
cov
er le
vels
• usi
ng a
revi
sed
IDL
alg
orit
hm b
ased
on
the
resu
lts
dat
a co
llect
ion
U
se e
xist
ing
and
new
fiel
d d
ata
fr
om: –
cal
ibra
tion
sit
es
ca
mp
aign
in t
able
2)
co
llect
ed b
y th
e st
ate
agen
cies
,
– hi
gh/
med
ium
-res
olut
ion
dat
a w
ith
upsc
alin
g
C
SIRO
and
GA
–
valid
atio
n si
tes
• w
ith
doc
umen
tati
on t
o in
dic
ate
diff
eren
ces
bet
wee
n ve
rsio
ns
cont
inue
d....
23
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
1 Ke
y ta
sks
to d
eliv
er a
n op
erat
iona
l rem
otel
y se
nsed
frac
tiona
l cov
er n
atio
nally
(201
0–20
13)
cont
inue
d
le
ad o
rgan
isat
ion
estim
ate
ofta
sk
and
part
ners
tim
efra
me
effor
t req
uire
d co
mm
ents
4. P
rod
uce
a La
ndsa
t-b
ased
(30
m) f
ract
iona
l cov
er
DER
M, D
ECC
W, G
A,
To b
e ad
vise
d
To b
e ad
vise
d
TERN
look
ing
to
stan
dar
dis
e
pro
duc
t
CSI
RO (C
LW)
pro
cess
ing
of L
and
sat
imag
ery
to• u
nder
take
an
asse
ssm
ent
of a
pp
roac
hes,
incl
udin
g:
av
oid
dup
licat
ion
of e
ffor
t (F
ebru
ary
–
linea
r un
mix
ing
(DER
M/D
ECC
W)
20
10 w
orks
hop
)
– m
ulti
ple
line
ar re
gres
sion
(DER
M/D
ECC
W)
Ex
tens
ive
field
dat
a av
aila
ble
for
–
imag
e cl
assi
fied
unm
ixin
g (G
A)
Q
ueen
slan
d u
nder
pas
tora
l lan
d u
ses
• for
sel
ecte
d s
ites
Req
uire
s lo
ts o
f val
idat
ion
dat
a• f
or U
psc
alin
g t
o M
OD
IS-b
ased
frac
tion
al c
over
(6
00 s
ites
ava
ilab
le fo
r Q
ueen
slan
d
wit
h p
lans
for
200–
300
site
s fo
r N
SW)
Use
ful f
or t
arg
eted
regi
ons
rath
er
than
wal
l-to
-wal
l map
pin
g
a Ta
sk 1
cou
ld b
e d
efer
red
to la
ter i
n th
e p
roje
ct a
fter
dev
elop
men
t of v
ersi
on 1
of t
he M
OD
IS-b
ased
frac
tiona
l cov
er.
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
24
2 Ke
y ta
sks
in th
e va
lidat
ion
of re
mot
ely
sens
ed fr
actio
nal c
over
(201
0–20
13)
le
ad o
rgan
isat
ion
estim
ate
ofta
sk
and
part
ners
tim
efra
me
effor
t req
uire
d co
mm
ents
1. P
erso
nnel
tra
inin
g in
fiel
d d
ata
colle
ctio
n
DER
M/D
ECC
W
Man
ual –
dra
ft fo
r
To b
e ad
vise
d
Cur
rent
SLA
TS g
ener
ic s
ite
dat
a fo
rm• u
nder
pin
ned
by
a fie
ld m
anua
l whi
ch
and
all
stat
e ag
ency
co
mm
ence
men
t of
to b
e im
pro
ved
/mod
ified
(e.g
. to
inc
lud
es a
sit
e fo
rm
par
tner
s tr
aini
ng; f
inal
dra
ft
in
clud
e ex
isti
ng n
atio
nal s
tand
ard
s• m
easu
rem
ent
of v
eget
atio
n fr
acti
ons
whi
ch u
ses
the:
at c
omp
leti
on o
f
for
soil
and
land
sur
veys
(NC
ST 2
009)
– s
tar-
tran
sect
met
hod
for
pas
tora
l env
ironm
ents
trai
ning
for
surf
ace
cond
itio
n an
d la
nd –
cro
ss-t
rans
ect
met
hod
for
linea
rly
sow
n cr
ops
Tr
aini
ng t
o oc
cur
m
anag
emen
t p
ract
ices
(nee
d fo
r• m
easu
rem
ent
of s
oil s
pec
tral
refle
ctan
ce
ov
er 6
–12
mon
ths
st
and
ard
ter
min
olog
y))
afte
r p
roje
ct in
itia
tion
Pers
onne
l tra
inin
g t
o oc
cur
in
diff
eren
t en
viro
nmen
ts t
hrou
gho
ut
Aus
tral
ia (a
t le
ast
one
rang
elan
d s
ite
an
d o
ne c
rop
pin
g s
ite
per
sta
te).
This
tr
aini
ng e
xerc
ise
can
be
used
to
co
mp
are
the
SLAT
S m
etho
dol
ogy
w
ith
exis
ting
sta
te-b
ased
pro
gram
s
Fi
eld
dat
a to
be
colle
cted
for
a
100
met
re x
100
met
re s
ite
(sui
tab
le
for
Land
sat
and
up
scal
ing
to
MO
DIS
)
2. S
amp
ling
fram
ewor
k A
BARE
S an
d C
SIRO
2–
3 m
onth
s fo
llow
ing
To
be
advi
sed
C
onsi
der
leve
l of a
ccur
acy
req
uire
d• s
tati
stic
ally
rob
ust
(C
MIS
) an
exp
erts
wor
ksho
p
an
d t
he im
age
sens
or p
rod
uct
bei
ng• c
onsi
der
s se
ason
alit
y, la
nd u
ses,
soi
l col
our
afte
r p
roje
ct in
itia
tion
valid
ated
(e.g
. MO
DIS
ver
sus
Land
sat)
• aim
s to
tim
e sa
mp
ling
to
coin
cid
e w
ith
Con
sid
er e
xist
ing
str
atifi
cati
ons
used
s
atel
lite
over
pas
s
for
mon
itor
ing
nat
iona
lly a
nd w
ithi
n• s
eeks
a s
tag
ed a
pp
roac
h to
val
idat
ion
of t
he
st
ates
(e.g
. soi
l con
dit
ion
mon
itor
ing,
f
ract
iona
l cov
er p
rod
uct
Vi
ctor
ia’s
pri
mar
y p
rod
ucti
on• u
ses
MC
AS-
S to
pri
orit
ise
site
loca
tion
s b
ased
land
scap
es)
on
fact
ors
such
as
eros
ion
risk
, fla
g a
naly
sis
etc
cont
inue
d....
25
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
2 Ke
y ta
sks
in th
e va
lidat
ion
of re
mot
ely
sens
ed fr
actio
nal c
over
(201
0–20
13)
cont
inue
d
le
ad o
rgan
isat
ion
estim
ate
ofta
sk
and
part
ners
tim
efra
me
effor
t req
uire
d co
mm
ents
3. S
pat
ially
ena
ble
d re
lati
onal
dat
abas
e fo
r fie
ld d
ata
ABA
RES
Ong
oing
com
men
cing
To
be
advi
sed
Ex
plo
re o
pti
ons
for
elec
tron
ic e
ntry
• com
pat
ible
wit
h cu
rren
t d
atab
ase
whi
ch u
ses
once
dat
a is
rece
ived
of d
ata
wit
hin
the
field
POST
GIS
from
tra
inin
g (
Task
1)
4. F
ield
dat
a co
llect
ion
cam
pai
gn
All
stat
e ag
ency
To
com
men
ce
0.01
FTE
per
day
2–
3 p
eop
le re
qui
red
for
each
sit
e vi
sit
• und
erp
inne
d b
y sa
mp
ling
fram
ewor
k p
artn
ers
fo
llow
ing
tra
inin
g
in t
he fi
eld
Ti
me
at e
ach
site
usi
ng D
ERM
’s SL
ATS
• sta
ged
ap
pro
ach
an
d t
o co
ntin
ue
(thi
s eq
uate
s to
m
etho
d:
• dat
a co
llect
ed t
wic
e ye
arly
as
a m
inim
um
to
May
201
3 ap
pro
xim
atel
y • ~
90 m
inut
es fo
r w
ood
land
s (
wet
and
dry
sea
son)
$1
000
per
sit
e
• ~40
min
utes
for
rang
elan
ds
(no
p
er v
isit
incl
udin
g
tr
ees)
tr
avel
exp
ense
s)
• ~30
min
utes
for
crop
pin
g
Alig
n ca
mp
aign
wit
h in
tere
sted
ot
hers
(e.g
. GA
, CSI
RO, G
RDC
, CM
As)
.
5. E
stab
lishm
ent
of s
uper
site
s
ABA
RES/
CSI
RO
Sele
ct s
ites
to
cove
r ra
nge
of• s
elec
ted
tar
get
ed s
ites
whe
re d
etai
led
fiel
d
(CLW
) wit
h st
ate
en
viro
nmen
ts, p
arti
cula
rly
thos
e m
easu
rem
ents
are
mad
e of
gro
und
cov
er,
agen
cy p
artn
ers
w
here
the
frac
tion
al c
over
pro
duc
t s
pec
tral
refle
ctan
ce, l
and
man
agem
ent
pra
ctic
es
ne
eds
mos
t im
pro
vem
ent
• tri
al U
psc
alin
g t
echn
ique
s• t
rial
met
rics
for
det
ecti
on o
f sel
ecte
d la
nd
man
agem
ent
pra
ctic
es in
mix
ed fa
rmin
g/c
rop
pin
g
26
Aappendix
26
presentation title presenter
Ground cover monitoring for soil condition reporting
Mr Ian ThompsonExecutive Manager, Sustainable Resources Management, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
Ground cover inputs for wind and water monitoring and modelling
Dr Michele Barson1 and Dr John Leys2
1Science Advisor, Australian Government Land & Coasts, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry2Principal Research Scientist, Scientific Services Division, NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
Fractional cover for Australia: scaling from the field to MODIS
Dr Juan GuerschmanResearch Scientist, Environmental Earth Observation Research Group, CSIRO Land and Water
Towards image-based monitoring of soil erosion risk in South Australian agricultural land
Dr Ken ClarkeSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide
A national dynamic land cover capability Dr Leo LymburnerRemote Sensing Applications Specialist, National Earth Observation Group, Geospatial and Earth Monitoring Division, Geoscience Australia
Ground cover in cropping environments using Landsat and MODIS
Dr Michael SchmidtScientist, Remote Sensing Centre, Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management
Mapping and monitoring of the soil surface using remote hyperspectral imaging
Dr Thomas CudahyGroup Leader, Minerals and Environmental Sensing, CSIRO Exploration & Mining
Bushfire CRC project: improved methods for assessment of grassland curing
Dr Ian GrantSpace Based Observation Section, Bureau of Meteorology
Calibration and validation – analysis of CSIRO fractional cover product
Dr Lucy RandallSenior Scientist, Land and Forest Sciences, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
A very brief update on ground cover mapping in NSW
Mr Tim DanaherRemote Sensing Section, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
Wireless sensor networks for monitoring ground cover change – a case study
Dr Andre ZergerCSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems
Wrap-up and options Dr John LeysPrincipal Research Scientist, Scientific Services Division, NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
Calibration and validation for remotely sensed ground cover: what is required?
Dr Tim MalthusResearch Group Leader, Environmental Earth Observation, CSIRO Land and Water
Note: These presentations are available to workshop participants and interested others via the ground cover monitoring GovDex site. Alternatively, contact the authors for access to the above presentations.
Workshop presentations
27
appe
ndix
27
Bname state organisation
Jason Barnetson e4 NTDepartment of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sports
Simon Barry Aus CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences
Michele Barson a Aus Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
Gary Bastin e1 Aus CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems
Mark Berman Aus CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences
Vivienne Bordas AusAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Dan Carter e2 WA Department of Agriculture and Food
Greg Chapman e2 NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
Rob Clark e2,4 Vic Department of Primary Industries
Ken Clarke ae1 SA University of Adelaide
Lex Cogle c Aus Murray–Darling Basin Authority
Tom Cudahy a Aus CSIRO Exploration & Mining
Tim Danaher ae2,3 NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
Anna Dutkiewicz e2 SA Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Forghani d Aus Murray–Darling Basin Authority
Giles Forward e4 SA Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ian Grant a Aus Bureau of Meteorology
Juan Guerschman ae1,3 Aus CSIRO Land and Water
Peter Hairsine bc Aus CSIRO Land and Water
Brian Harrild d Aus Australian Bureau of Statistics
Alex Held b Aus CSIRO Office of Space Science & Applications
Bob Karfs e2 QldDepartment of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation
Stuart Kearns e4 RDC Grains Research and Development Corporation
Darren Kidd e2,4 Tas Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment
Paul Lawrence bc Qld Department of Environment and Resource Management
Adam Lewis Aus Geoscience Australia
John Leys ae1,4 NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
Leo Lymburner ae1,3 Aus Geoscience Australia
Tim Malthus ae2 Aus CSIRO Land and Water
Elizabeth McDonald Aus Bureau of Meteorology
Tim McVicar be3,4 Aus CSIRO Land and Water
Simon Oliver AusDepartment of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
Annette Philippa e2 AusDepartment of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
Lucy Randall ae1,3 AusAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Workshop participants
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
28
name state organisation
Jasmine Rickards e2,4 AusAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Michael Schmidt ae3 Qld Department of Environment and Resource Management
Jane Stewart e2,4 AusAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Glenn Stone Aus CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences
Richard Thackway e2 AusAustralian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Medhavy Thankappan Aus Geoscience Australia
Stephen Thomas RDC Grains Research and Development Corporation
Ian Thompson ac Aus Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
Alys Wall Aus Murray–Darling Basin Authority
Peter Wilson e2,4 Aus CSIRO Land and Water
Christian Witte e4 Qld Department of Environment and Resource Management
Andre Zerger a Aus CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems
a Workshop presenter. b Workshop chair. c Attended first day of workshop only. d Attended second day of workshop onlye Working group member. 1 Implementing MODIS-based fractional cover mapping operationally for the nation. 2 Field data collection. 3 Upscaling. 4 Monitoring land management practices with remote sensing.
29
appe
ndix
29
CIntroduction The sustainable practices target for Caring for our Country focuses on improving the condition of the soil resource through the adoption of better land management practices. Four indicators of resource condition, identified through the work of the National Land and Water Resources Audit (and endorsed by the Audit Advisory Council)—wind erosion, water erosion, soil acidification and soil carbon—will be used to help report on the condition of Australia’s soil resources and the longer term effect of land management practices on condition.
Caring for our Country, working in collaboration with state agencies, CSIRO and other research organisations, has invested in a series of projects aimed at improving Australia’s capacity to monitor wind erosion (Forward 2009; Leys et al. 2009, 2010; McTainsh et al. 2010; Mitchell et al. 2010), water erosion (Leys et al. 2009; Bui et al. 2010), soil acidification and soil carbon (Baldock et al. 2009; Ringrose-Voase in preparation). These projects have recommended bringing together data from a number of sources to monitor soil condition indicators by combining ground-based sampling, remote sensing and spatially explicit modelling. A number of the data inputs required for this monitoring will need to be developed or improved—proposals for this work are currently being considered.
High frequency (monthly) spatially explicit ground cover (vegetation, biological crusts and stone that is in contact with the soil surface) data are needed to improve wind and water erosion modelling and monitoring. Most methods used to estimate cover values have not been able to account for dead and dry vegetation, which has frequently been classified as bare ground, leading to overestimates of the rates of erosion (Hairsine et al. 2009).
Spatially explicit ground cover data has also been identified as an input needed to improve soil carbon and pH modelling proposed under the national soil condition modelling project. Additionally, monthly ground cover data will contribute to understanding the impact of climate variability on pasture condition, particularly in the rangelands.
Wind erosion modelling for resource condition reportingThe CEMSYS (Computational Environmental Management System; Shao et al. 2007) model is recommended (Leys et al. 2009) for evaluating the frequency and intensity of wind erosion across Australia, and has been used by Caring for our Country to identify where improving soil and land management practices to reduce soil loss from wind erosion will provide the biggest benefits (Smith and Leys 2009). CEMSYS estimates the onsite soil loss and the offsite dust concentration at national, state and (some) regional scales and provides monthly maps of wind erosion rates at 50-kilometre resolution for the Australian continent and 10-kilometre resolution for New South Wales. The spatial resolution for wind erosion modelling is limited by the resolution of the GIS data (soil texture, soil type, vegetation, roughness) and that of
Remote sensing specifications for monitoring ground cover nationally
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
30
the atmospheric model (currently 10-kilometre resolution) (Leys et al. 2009, pp. 114–119). A number of improvements to CEMSYS are proposed to enable its use in modelling trends in wind erosion. These include improving the reliability of the cover estimates by incorporating fractional cover data.
Spatial and temporal scalesFor ground cover (woody and non-woody), the following specifications are required of data layers for use in modelling wind erosion (using CEMSYS) at the national scale (with applicability at the state and regional scale):
• spatial resolution: 500 to 1000-metre resolution• temporal resolution: monthly• domain would be: Australia-wide (lower left corner 112 east to 45 south, upper right corner
155 east to 10 south)• preferred file format would be ARC-ACSII format.
Non-woody coverIdeally fractional non-woody cover estimates would be classed as follows:
• physical soil crusts• disturbed/loose soil• cryptogamic soil crusts• live (that is, photosynthesising)• dead vegetation cover (that is, non-photosynthesising vegetation)• litter• rock.
Interim non-woody fractional cover estimates could be classed as follows:
• photosynthetic vegetation (PV)• non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV)• bare ground (BG).
Woody coverFractional woody cover (proportion of photosynthetic vegetation contributing to the overstorey) is also required for:
• spatial resolution: 500 to 1000-metre resolution• temporal resolution: annual• domain would be: Australia-wide (lower left corner 112 east to 45 south, upper right corner
155 east to 10 south)• preferred file format would be ARC-ACSII format.
31
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Water erosion modelling for resource condition monitoringCurrently SedNet (Sediment and nutrient budget model (Wilkinson et al. 2004)), which includes the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), is recommended for modelling water erosion nationally down to the regional scale (Leys et al. 2009). WaterCAST, being developed at the eWater Cooperative Research Centre, is viewed as having the potential to replace SedNet in the future for assessment at catchment level and possibly state and national level (Leys et al. 2009) but at present data are inadequate for model parameterisation.
SedNet models sediment loads from hillslope, gully and streambank erosion and models nutrient loads providing long-term annual average estimates at 5-kilometre resolution. Improved differentiation of bare ground and dead or bleached vegetation in the satellite image interpretation used as measures of cover in the RUSLE calculations would improve model outputs (Hairsine et al. 2009). Higher resolution inputs such as for land use and vegetation, the introduction of a land management term in addition to a cover term and improved soils data have also been identified as priority improvements needed in the assessment of soil erosion by water (following NLWRA program of 2001–2003) (see Leys et al. 2009, p. 43). Some of these issues have been addressed for case studies but have yet to be applied nationwide.
Spatial and temporal scalesFor ground cover, the following specifications are required of data layers for use in modelling water erosion (using SedNet) at the national to regional scale:
• spatial resolution: 500 to 1000-metre resolution• temporal resolution: monthly• domain would be: Australia-wide (lower left corner 112 east to 45 south, upper right corner
155 east to 10 south)• preferred file format would be ARC-ACSII format.
Non-woody coverFractional non-woody cover estimates are required for:
• photosynthetic vegetation (PV)• non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) • bare ground (BG)• rock.
Interpretation of fractional cover into management practice classes (such as crop versus fallow) would improve cover estimate in RUSLE.
Monitoring agricultural land management practicesCaring for our Country sustainable practices funding is focused on improving the uptake of practices which will reduce soil loss through wind and water erosion, manage the soil
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
32
acidification risk and increase soil carbon storage. Practices of particular interest include those which increase the proportion of ground cover present year round.
The biennial ABS Agricultural Resource Management Survey provides information reported by farmers on the uptake of land management practices at NRM region level for Caring for our Country reporting. There may be opportunities for providing an additional line of evidence on the impact of certain management practices on ground cover at a small number of sites within the intensively used agricultural zone.
Spatial and temporal scalesFor national, state and regional assessment of ground cover levels to support Caring for our Country reporting, the following are required:
• spatial resolution: generally 30-metre but up to 500-metre resolution (influenced by paddock size—resolution less if want to assess within paddock variation)
• temporal resolution: annually (at minimum cover or at time of most risk) to monthly— time-series required
• coverage: rangelands and intensive land use zones of Australia.
Non-woody coverFractional non-woody cover estimates are required for:
• photosynthetic vegetation (PV)• non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV)• bare ground (BG).
Within the intensively used agricultural zone, methods to measure fractional cover and to interpret remotely sensed fractional cover estimates into key management practices related to ground cover maintenance should be trialled at selected sites. Such management practices include:
• cultivated fallow (bare soil, timing and length)• crop residue (left or removed; timing and length)• grazing pressure (ground cover (PV+NPV) > 50 per cent).
Stewart and Rickards (2010) indicate potential options for monitoring land management practices using remote sensing in the intensively managed agricultural zone.
Calibration and validation of remotely sensed ground cover productsA remotely sensed ground cover product is underpinned by on-ground measurement of the features being estimated. To implement production nationally, agreement must be reached
33
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
on the location of ground control sites and what is measured at each site. A separate issue is agreement on the processing steps to produce the remotely sensed ground cover product.
To establish a national network of control sites for remote sensing of ground cover, the following steps are suggested:
1 Develop and evaluate a core set of attributes for describing and mapping ground control sites.
2 Review and test methods needed for field-based collection of new ground control sites to ensure suitability of use in all jurisdictions for all agricultural systems (including the rangelands).
3 Review existing sites against the agreed core set of attributes.
4 Undertake a statistical analysis to identify the numbers and likely locations of sites needed to adequately represent spatial variability of all agricultural systems.
5 Compare existing sites with sites needed according to the statistical analysis to identify gaps in the national ground reference sites database.
6 Develop an investment plan (taking into account available budget) to collect the data needed for additional ground control sites.
7 Agree arrangements, methods, costings and timelines with agencies participating in the on-ground collection.
8 Collate ground control site data.
9 Make ground control site dataset publicly available via the web.
Methods for on-ground measurement of ground cover fractions should be assessed on the usefulness of the information to inform reporting, capacity to migrate methods across environments, and suitability for multiple sensors (for example, MODIS and Landsat). These control sites will need to meet the needs of image-based ground cover mapping at national, state and regional scales. Establishment of new control sites to improve the reliability of the remotely sensed outputs must be prioritised.
34
appe
ndix
34
DExample 1: Leaf area indexFigure 5 shows how an upscaling methodology can be used to extend the spatial domain of measurements initially made over a much smaller area than the final relationships are used for. In this example, 1 m2 field observations of leaf area index (LAI) in homogeneous herbaceous (that is, cropping and grazing) fields were destructively sampled, and step one (McVicar et al. 1996a) involved relating this site data to Landsat TM data, enabling production of a Landsat TM based LAI image. Step two (McVicar et al. 1996b) involved developing relationships between the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data and the Landsat TM based LAI image. The AVHRR LAI estimate was then estimated for the entire Murray–Darling Basin.
Example 2: Ground cover and biomassMilne at al. (2007) evaluated MODIS for estimating ground cover and biomass/feed availability in mixed tree-grass grazing systems (for example, tropical savannah). Foliage projective cover and biomass was collected at 100 by 100-metre field sites. Field measurements were related to the 1-kilometre MODIS cells in which they reside by weighting an observation based on a ratio between the scaled up Landsat TM (30-metre cells) bare ground data at 100 by 100-metre
Remotely sensed examples of upscaling
+G G+
G++D
+D
+G G+
G++D
+D
A remotely sensed upscaling method to spatially extend data beyond the isolated �eld measurement sites
1000 km
1000 km
180 km
5AVHRR data for 1 000 000 km2
at 1 km resolution
ground measurements fromalready existing �eld stationsof soil and water parameters
Landsat TM data for 32400 km2
at 30 m2 resolution+G G+
G++D
+D180 km
35
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
(the field site area) and the scaled up Landsat TM bare ground at the MODIS 1-kilometre pixel resolution. The project centred on Charters Towers and the Brisbane Valley but the methodology (or upscaling technique) could be equally applied across all of Queensland.
Example 3: Fractional coverGuerschman et al. (2009) linked field-level spectral radiometric observations (made with a portable spectroradiometer from Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc) to Hyperion (30-metre resolution) hyperspectral satellite data. End-members relating to the pure components of photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic (senescent) vegetation and bare soil could be distinguished in both sets of hyperspectral data. To upscale to the MODIS resolution (a broadband instrument, like Landsat, which does not have all the hyperspectral bands of the spectroradiometer and Hyperion), they developed spectral surrogates using an optimally selected set of MODIS bands to capture the information content in the hyperspectral imagery. This enabled the unmixing of two MODIS indices to map the fraction of photosynthetic vegetation, senescent vegetation and bare soil at the MODIS resolution.
36
appe
ndix
36
EGeneric_Site_20060221_RCH
- 1 -6
Site Description
Site Number:_______________ Date:___________
Zone:____ Datum:_______ Easting:____________ Northing:____________
Bearing (to GPS):_______ Distance (to GPS):_______
Film No:_____ Photo Nos:________________________________
Description:__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Landform (Crest; Upper; Mid; Lower; Flat; Closed; Open):__________
Slope %:_____ Aspect:_____
Soil Colour:
Crust Dry Dist. Dry Adtnl. Dry Crust Wet Dist. Wet Adtnl. Wet Soil Hue Soil Value SoilChroma
Cryptogam %:_____ Cryptogam colour:__________
Rock/Lag Colour:
1st Dominant 2nd Dominant 3rd Dominant 4th Dominant 5th Dominant Rock Hue Rock Value RockChroma
Rock/Lag % est.:______ Biomass est. (kg/ha):___________
Grass height (cm):_____ Fire:___________
Faunal activity:_____ Faunal type (Cattle; Sheep; Macropod; Termites; Ants; Locust):_____
Crust Brokenness (Extensively broken; Moderately broken; Slightly broken; Intact):_____
Erosion Features (Rills; Terracettes; Sheeting; Scalding; Hummocking; Pedestalling):_____
Deposited Material (Extensive; Moderate; Slight; Insignificant):_____
Soil Microtopography (Smooth; Shallow depressions; Deeper depressions; Deep formations; Very deep and extensive):_____
Surface Nature (Non-brittle; Very hard; Moderately hard; Easily broken; Loose-sandy):_____
SLATS generic site data form
37
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Generic_Site_20060221_RCH
- 2 -6
Vegetation description:
1st Dom by biomass % 2nd Dom by biomass % 3rd Dom by biomass %
Overstorey
Understorey
Grasses/Forb
Overstory height: Observer:________ % Slope at 20m:________
TBA:
Prism factor Observer Live Dead Killed by fire Converted
Centre 1
North 2
NE 3
SE 4
South 5
SW 6
NW 7
Total Live TBA (Sum Converted TBA / 7):______m2/ha
Weights: No. Q’s:_____ Total Wet Weight :__________g Sub Sample Wet Weight :__________g
Sub Sample Dry Weight :___________g TSDM :___________kg/ha
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
38
Generic_Site_20060221_RCH
- 3 -6
Site TransectSite Number:_______________ Sheet Number:_____ Date:__________ Bearing:_______
Zone:_____ Datum:__________ Easting:__________ Northing:__________
CRUST DIST ROCKGREEN
LF DEAD
LF LITTER CRYPT MIDGR
MIDDE
MIDBR
INCRWN
OVER GR
OVER DE
OVER BR CRUST DIST ROCK
GREEN LF
DEAD LF LITTER CRYPT
MIDGR
MIDDE
MIDBR
INCRWN
OVER GR
OVER DE
OVER BR
1 51
2 52
3 53
4 54
5 55
6 56
7 57
8 58
9 59
10 60
11 61
12 62
13 63
14 64
15 65
16 66
17 67
18 68
19 69
20 70
21 71
22 72
23 73
24 74
25 75
26 76
27 77
28 78
29 79
30 80
31 81
32 82
33 83
34 84
35 85
36 86
37 87
38 88
39 89
40 90
41 91
42 92
43 93
44 94
45 95
46 96
47 97
48 98
49 99
50 100
SUB
TTL
39
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings Generic_Site_20060221_RCH
- 4 -6
Site Number:_______________ Sheet Number:_____ Date:__________ Bearing:_______
Zone:_____ Datum:__________ Easting:__________ Northing:__________
CRUST DIST ROCKGREEN
LF DEAD
LF LITTER CRYPT MIDGR
MIDDE
MIDBR
INCRWN
OVER GR
OVER DE
OVER BR CRUST DIST ROCK
GREEN LF
DEAD LF LITTER CRYPT
MIDGR
MIDDE
MIDBR
INCRWN
OVER GR
OVER DE
OVER BR
1 51
2 52
3 53
4 54
5 55
6 56
7 57
8 58
9 59
10 60
11 61
12 62
13 63
14 64
15 65
16 66
17 67
18 68
19 69
20 70
21 71
22 72
23 73
24 74
25 75
26 76
27 77
28 78
29 79
30 80
31 81
32 82
33 83
34 84
35 85
36 86
37 87
38 88
39 89
40 90
41 91
42 92
43 93
44 94
45 95
46 96
47 97
48 98
49 99
50 100
SUB
TTL
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
40
Generic_Site_20060221_RCH
- 5 -6
Site Number:_______________ Sheet Number:_____ Date:__________ Bearing:_______
Zone:_____ Datum:__________ Easting:__________ Northing:__________
CRUST DIST ROCKGREEN
LF DEAD
LF LITTER CRYPT MIDGR
MIDDE
MIDBR
INCRWN
OVER GR
OVER DE
OVER BR CRUST DIST ROCK
GREEN LF
DEAD LF LITTER CRYPT
MIDGR
MIDDE
MIDBR
INCRWN
OVER GR
OVER DE
OVER BR
1 51
2 52
3 53
4 54
5 55
6 56
7 57
8 58
9 59
10 60
11 61
12 62
13 63
14 64
15 65
16 66
17 67
18 68
19 69
20 70
21 71
22 72
23 73
24 74
25 75
26 76
27 77
28 78
29 79
30 80
31 81
32 82
33 83
34 84
35 85
36 86
37 87
38 88
39 89
40 90
41 91
42 92
43 93
44 94
45 95
46 96
47 97
48 98
49 99
50 100
SUB
TTL
41
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Generic_Site_20060221_RCH
- 6 -6
Site selection criteria
• Sample the full range of cover from 0 to 100%. • Sample a range of soil colours and textures. • Sample a range of TBA from 0 to approx 10m2/ha (although upper limit yet to be determined) • Sample a range of understorey cover amounts. • Ideally locate paired sites across fence lines sampling a contrasting cover on either side. • Locate in areas of uniform density and species mix for a minimum patch size of 300 x 300m if possible (larger if non DGPS). • Locate a minimum of 100 metres from roads or other features not characteristic of the vegetation being measured (from the edge of site). • Locate away from water run-on areas if possible. • On level or near level ground. • If a sloped site is necessary, avoid western and southern slopes (these are affected by shadow due to winter and morning sun angles).
Transect recording
• Minimum 300 sample points (100m transect tape x 3). • Transect tapes laid strictly in a 0, 60 and 120 deg star pattern. The site centre is located at the intersection of the star. • Measure in order of 0 – 180 deg, 60 – 240 deg and 120 – 300 deg for consistency. • Averaged DGPS or GPS position at site centre (minimum 3-5min averaging for DGPS, longer for non DGPS). Recorded as UTM (Easting and
Northing) with associated Zone and using default Datum WGS84. (Use UTM, Datum GDA94, Spheroid GRS1980 if available on GPS). • Care should be taken to lay the tape out in a straight line - not dodging trees or shrubs. • Care should be taken when placing the pole at each metre mark - read the ground cover first by looking vertically (or using a thin steel wire rod) above
the tape thus avoiding crushing or moving a prospective grass/litter attribute. A laser pointer taped to the pole is more useful in areas with significant understorey e.g. heath.
• Before recording make sure both the observer and recorder are clear as to the classes being measured. Call in order of ground layer, mid layer, overstorey e.g. crust; mid (storey) green (leaf); crown; over (storey) branch.
• If recording hard copy sheets, care must be taken when reducing the measurements - have someone check the adding up and also the logic.• If using a GRS Densitometer, both spirit levels must be centred and the recording spot centred in target circle.• If using a gimballed sighting tube, the tube MUST BE FREE to ROTATE on the gimbal, otherwise operator bias WILL BE INTRODUCED.
Optical Wedges/Prisms
• When two people first go into the field they should both take BA wedge measurements at several sites to check if one or the other is systematically measuring more or less than the other [strict blind testing procedure advised].
• The possible reasons for bias are: o instead of counting every second "split" tree as “in”, the operator leaves all “out” or puts all “in”...(error = 0.5xthe number of "split" trees) o not keeping the wedge at the site centre – i.e. rotating the wedge around the body at arms length (error is most significant where site
position is amongst bushes that may be counted as solid trunks if the wedge is close enough)o not looking behind large trees near the observer – can move off centre to check, keeping perpendicular...(error nil to quite large)o using the wrong thickness wedge relative to the tree/bush trunk thicknesses (error can vary depending upon site and or the operator) o poor eyesight - not being able to clearly see distant trees - thus leading to a preference for using a wedge that has a shorter
measurement range (error generally in reading less trees than exist at the site) o not measuring/looking at the tree trunk at breast height – 1.3 m (error depends on tree thickness but if looking low the counts will be
higher than they should be)
The following table should be used to help select a suitable prism for a basal area measurement. Try to choose a prism which will give a plot radius of 15-20m. If the plot radius is larger make sure that its in a uniform area.
Plot radii (metres) as a function of prism factor and tree diameter
Tree Diameter (m)
Prism Factor 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.5
0.2 11 34 56 78 112 168 0.25 10 30 50 70 100 150 0.7 6 18 30 42 60 90 0.8 6 17 28 39 56 84 0.9 5 16 26 37 53 79 1.0 5 15 25 35 50 75 2.0 4 11 18 25 35 53 2.25 3 10 17 23 33 50 2.5 3 10 16 22 32 47
Optical Wedge Calibration
1. Set up a target such as a white board or wall at least 5 metres from where the wedge is held. Use up to 10 metres if you can see well as a greater distance is better.
2. Place a vertical line on the target using a marker pen. Hold the wedge at the measured distance (d) from the target and look through it at the line. Get a second person to draw another line, marking the displacement seen through the wedge.
3. Measure this distance (w) in the same units as (d).
4. Calculate the basal area factor as follows: Basal Area Factor (BAF) = 1000/ (1+4*(d/w)2)
where d = distance to target; w = displacement width e.g. d = 5m, w = 0.1m; BAF = 1.0
Groundcover
Tree & G. C.
42
ReferencesABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) 2009, Land management and farming in Australia 2007–08
(4627.0), viewed 29 December 2010, www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/7CAF008176640264CA2575C40017E313/$File/46270_2007-08.pdf.
Baldock, JA, Grundy, MJ, Griffin, EA, Webb, MJ, Wong, MTF and Broos, K 2009, Building a foundation for soil condition assessment, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, CSIRO Land and Water Science Report, viewed 29 December 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/pubs/foundation-soil-condition.pdf.
Bastin, G and the ACRIS (Australian Collaborative Rangelands Information System) Management Committee 2008, Rangelands 2008 – Taking the pulse, National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra.
Bui, EN, Hancock, GJ, Chappell, A and Gregory, LJ 2010, Evaluation of tolerable erosion rates and time to critical topsoil loss in Australia, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, CSIRO National Research Flagships Sustainable Agriculture, viewed 29 December 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/pubs/tolerable-erosion.pdf.
BRS (Bureau of Rural Sciences) 2009, MCAS-S: Multi-Criteria Analysis Shell for Spatial Decision Support Version 2.1, User Guide, Commonwealth of Australia, viewed 4 January 2011, www.adl.brs.gov.au/mcass/docs/User_Guide.pdf.
Clarke, K, Lewis, M, Ostendorf, B and Dutkiewicz, A 2010, ‘Towards broadscale monitoring of soil erosion risk in southern Australia through relative spectral mixture analysis of MODIS imagery’, Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Remote Sensing & Photogrammetry Conference, viewed 4 January 2011, www.scribd.com/doc/37527339/15arspc-Submission-6.
Forward, G 2009, Manual of proposed national minimum standards for roadside erosion survey, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, DWLBC Report 2009/24, Government of South Australia, through the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Adelaide, viewed 29 December 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/pubs/standards-roadside-erosion.pdf.
Guerschman, JP, Hill, MJ, Renzullo, LJ, Barrett, DJ, Marks, AS and Botha, EJ 2009, ‘Estimating fractional cover of photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil in the Australian tropical savanna region upscaling the EO-1 Hyperion and MODIS sensors’, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 113, pp. 928–45, viewed 9 June 2010, www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V6V-4VPV8TF-1-1M&_cdi=5824&_user=768459&_pii=S0034425709000121&_orig=search&_coverDate=05%2F15%2F2009&_sk=998869994&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzz-zSkzS&md5=6f54f3d34442f91457bd6140e1d9876c&ie=/sdarticle.pdf.
Hairsine, PB, Barson, M, Randall, L and Wilkinson, SN 2009, The 2009 expert panel process in support of the spatial targeting of the Caring for our Country investment concerning hillslope erosion by water, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, CSIRO Land and Water Science Report 45/09, viewed 15 January 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/business-plan/10-11/priorities/sustainable/pubs/report2-wind-erosion.pdf.
Lymburner, L, Tan, P, Mueller, N, Thackway, R, Thankappan, M, Islam, A, Randall, L and Lewis, A 2010, ‘Australia’s first dynamic land cover map’, Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Remote Sensing & Photogrammetry Conference, 13–17 September 2010, Alice Springs, viewed 5 January 2010, www.scribd.com/doc/37457498/15arspc-Submission-96.
43
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
Leys, J, Butler, H, Yang, X and Heidenreich, S 2010, CEMSYS modelled wind erosion, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, viewed 29 December 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/pubs/cemsys-wind-erosion.pdf.
Leys, J, Smith, J, MacRae, C, Rickards, J, Yang, X, Randall, L, Hairsine, P, Dixon, J and McTainsh, G 2009, Improving the Capacity to Monitor Wind and Water Erosion: A Review, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Commonwealth of Australia, viewed 15 January 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/pubs/wind-water-erosion.pdf.
McTainsh, G, Strong, C and Leys, J 2010, Wind erosion histories, model input data and community DustWatch, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, Atmospheric Environment Research Centre, Griffith University, Brisbane, viewed 29 December 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/pubs/wind-erosion-histories.pdf.
McVicar, TR, Jupp, DLB, Reece, PH and Williams, NA 1996a, Relating LANDSAT TM vegetation indices to in situ leaf area index measurements, Technical Memorandum 96.14, CSIRO Division of Water Resources, Canberra, ACT, viewed 15 January 2010, www.clw.csiro.au/publications/technical96/DWR_TR96-14.pdf.
McVicar, TR, Jupp, DLB and Williams, NA 1996b, Relating AVHRR vegetation indices to LANDSAT TM leaf area index estimates, Technical Memorandum 96.15, CSIRO Division of Water Resources, Canberra, ACT, viewed 15 January 2010, www.clw.csiro.au/publications/technical96/DWR_TR-96-15.pdf.
Milne, J, Danaher, TJ, Scarth, P, Carter, JO, Armston, J, Henry, B, Cronin, N, Hassett, R, Stone, G, Williams, P, Denham, R, Byrne, M and Gillingham, S 2007, Evaluation of MODIS for groundcover and biomass/feed availability estimates in tropical savannah systems, final report to Meat & Livestock Australia (Project Code NBP.330), Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water, Climate Impacts and Natural Resource Systems, Indooroopilly, Brisbane.
Mitchell, RM, Qin, Y and Campbell, SK 2010, Dust sentinel pilot: capacity of three polar orbiting satellite instruments to map dust aerosol over the Australian continent, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, viewed 29 December 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/pubs/dust-sentinal-pilot.pdf.
NCST (The National Committee on Soil and Terrain) 2009, Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook, 3rd edn, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria.
Ringrose-Voase, A in preparation, Establishing the coordinated national soil condition monitoring project, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country.
Scarth, P, Byrne, M, Danaher, T, Hasset, R, Carter, J and Timmers, P 2006, State of the Paddock: Monitoring condition and trend in groundcover across Queensland, Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Indooroopilly, Brisbane.
Scarth, P, Roder, A and Schmidt, M 2010, ‘Tracking grazing pressure and climate interaction – the role of Landsat fractional cover in time series analysis’, Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Remote Sensing & Photogrammetry Conference, viewed 4 January 2011, www.scribd.com/doc/37455672/15arspc-Submission-140.
Schmidt, M, Denham, R and Scarth, P 2010a, ‘Fractional ground cover monitoring of pastures and agricultural areas in Queensland’, Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Remote Sensing & Photogrammetry Conference, viewed 4 January 2011, www.scribd.com/doc/37455826/15arspc-Submission-119.
Ground cover monitoring for Australia ABARES Workshop proceedings
44
Schmidt, M, Tindall, D, Speller, K, Scarth, P and Dougall, C 2010b, Ground cover monitoring with satellite imagery in agricultural areas and improved pastures, final report to the Bureau of Rural Sciences, State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management).
Shao, Y, Leys, J, McTainsh, G and Tews, K 2007, ‘Numerical simulation of the October 2002 dust event in Australia’, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 112, pp. 1–12.
Smith, J and Leys, J 2009, Wind erosion priority areas for Caring for our Country expert panel prioritisation process, report to the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, viewed 15 January 2010, www.nrm.gov.au/business-plan/10-11/priorities/sustainable/pubs/report2-wind-erosion.pdf.
Stewart, JB and Rickards, JE 2010, Developing national protocols to map ground cover management practices in cropping and grazing systems: Report on an Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program workshop, 12–13 May 2009, Brisbane, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, viewed 29 December 2010, http://adl.brs.gov.au/data/warehouse/pe_brs90000004194/ACLUMP_workshopReport_20100301_ap14.pdf.
Wilkinson, S, Henderson, A, Chen, Y and Sherman, B 2004, SedNet user guide, client report to the Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, viewed 15 January 2010, www.toolkit.net.au/Tools/SedNet/documentation.