Austerity in Ontario May 2012

21
“The major economic problem faced by Canadians is a very slow recovery and weak job market, not government deficits or rising debt. But public spending cuts at the federal and provincial level will make the real problem even worse.” -- Andrew Jackson, Chief Economist, Canadian Labour Congress

description

This new OPSEU PowerPoint presentation provides basic facts about Dalton McGuinty’s “austerity” campaign to cut public services, jobs and wages. Complete with speaker’s notes, anyone can deliver it to local meetings, bargaining team caucuses, area councils, or any other group

Transcript of Austerity in Ontario May 2012

Page 1: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

“The major economic problem faced by Canadians is a very slow recovery and weak job market, not government deficits or rising debt. But public spending cuts at the federal and provincial level will make the real problem even worse.”

-- Andrew Jackson, Chief Economist, Canadian Labour Congress

Page 2: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Attacks on jobs, wages and services in a time of rising profits

Summer 2012

Page 3: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

People who depend on public services – which is everybody – are seeing many of those services weakened or wiped out entirelyThe 2012 Ontario Budget will cut $17.7 billion from public services over the next three years

Page 4: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Public employees are facing direct attacks on their jobs and wagesThe government is cutting jobs and demanding a wage “freeze” (really a wage cut equal to the rate of inflation) for all provincial workersPrivate sector wages are not keeping up either. In Ontario, overall wages went up just 0.7 per cent from Feb. 2011 to Feb. 2012. But inflation was 2.9 per cent. In other words, real wages (after inflation) fell by 2.2 per cent

Page 5: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Premier Dalton McGuinty is making these big problems worseMcGuinty says more deep cuts to public services, wages, and jobs are needed to get the deficit to zero by 2017-18

Page 6: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012
Page 7: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

The government has exaggerated how bad the deficit is In the early 1990s there were five yearswhen the deficit was worse than it is nowThe deficit is manageable

Page 8: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Taking advice from banker Don Drummond, McGuinty wants cuts that are deeper and last longer than those of the 1990sDrummond was happy to ignore options for raising revenues because it helped “keep the screws on” spendingBased on this, you might think the deficit was caused by public spending. It wasn’t

Page 9: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Ontario’s deficit was caused by the recession, which cut tax revenues to governments everywhereOntario had balanced budgets for three years before the recessionOntario has the lowest spending per person of any province in Canada

Page 10: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Ontario’s program spending is 11 per cent lower than the average of the other provincesSpending is not the problem

Page 11: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Spending cuts will hurt the economy and reduce government revenues The Centre for Spatial Economics, a mainstream forecasting firm, estimates that the 2012 Budget will cost 7,000 jobs in 2012But by 2015, Ontario will have 105,000 fewer jobs In 2015, the unemployment rate will be 0.9 per cent higher as a result of the Budget

Page 12: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Of the 105,000 jobs missing in 2015, 65,000 will be public sector jobs and 40,000 will be private sector jobs

Page 13: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Cutting spending on public services hurts the economy more than an equivalent increase in taxes:

“Raising taxes rather than cutting spending imposes lower costs on society in terms of reduced jobs and GDP while achieving the government’s objective of reducing the deficit.”

- Centre for Spatial Economics, April 2012

Page 14: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Cuts and privatization will cut wages and jobs for workers while creating more profit opportunities for investors. They won’t help struggling households – in the public sector orthe private sector

Page 15: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Consumers and governments have been propping up corporate profits for close to three decades – by going into debtMeanwhile, corporations in Canada are sitting on $527 billion in cashthat they are not spending or investing

Page 16: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012
Page 17: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

The global economy is like a Monopoly game in which one player has all the money and the others are brokeIt’s time to start a new game. That can only happen by redistributing money from corporations and high-incomeindividuals to workers and governments to get the economy rolling again

Page 18: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Around the world, citizens are fighting back, demanding solutions that don’tmean lower wages and higher profits, or fewer public services and more private ones

Page 19: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

In the last two years, OPSEU has:promoted fair taxation at the G-20 campaigned to reveal the link between the

McGuinty wage freeze and corporate tax cutslaunched the satirical “People for Corporate Tax

Cuts” campaignSupported the Occupy movement and its

opposition to growing inequalitysponsored the Commission on Quality Public

Services and Tax Fairness

Page 20: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

The 2012 provincial Budget deal that raised taxes on those earning more than $500,000 a year will raise around $500 million a year for public servicesMore needs to be done to support jobs, wages, and public servicesIn 2012, we are fighting “austerity” in our communities and at the bargaining tableWorking people did not cause Ontario’s problems….

Page 21: Austerity in Ontario  May 2012

Phot

o: Ja

ckso

n C

hui