Independence factors influencing audit expectation gap in ...
AUDIT EXPECTATION GAP IN GHANA (CASE STUDY OF SENIOR ...
Transcript of AUDIT EXPECTATION GAP IN GHANA (CASE STUDY OF SENIOR ...
AUDIT EXPECTATION GAP IN GHANA
(CASE STUDY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN KUMASI METROPOLITAN
ASSEMBLY, ASHANTI REGION)
By
Ahmed Iddrisu, BBA (Hons.)
A thesis Submitted to the Department of Accounting and Finance, Kwame
Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), in partial fulfillment
of the requirement for the degree of
MASTERS OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (ACCOUNTING- OPTION)
COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
AUGUST, 2015
ii
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this piece is my own work towards the Master of Business
Administration and that, to the best of my knowledge, it contains no material
previously published by another person or material which has been accepted for the
award of any other degree of the university except where due acknowledgement has
been made in the text.
Ahmed Iddrisu ………………..……… ….………………
PG 9606213 Signature Date
Certified by:
Dr. Daniel Sakyi ………………..……… ….………………
(Supervisor) Signature Date
Certified by:
Dr. K.O Appiah ………………..……… ….………………
(Head of Department) Signature Date
iii
ABSTRACT
This study investigates audit expectation gap in public senior high schools in the
Ashanti Region of Ghana. This follows a number of observation differences between
the public‟s expectation of the auditors‟ roles and what the auditors actually do. Using
a sample of 120 persons from 22 public senior high schools within the Kumasi
metropolis and Cross Tabulation, it was discovered that there is a difference between
the opinion of auditors and general public with respect to the statutory role of external
auditors, duty of auditors, reliability on audit reports for decision making, and
independence factors. The audit expectation gap is multi-faceted but consists mainly
of misunderstanding of the external auditor‟s responsibilities by the users of audited
financial statements. It is recommended that the public should be educated on the
responsibilities of auditors, the extent to which they can rely on auditor‟s report and
nature of audit services.
iv
ACKNOWLEGEMENT
I express my profound gratitude to the Almighty Allah for his grace and mercies
without which this work would not have been completed. I also wish to thank the
following persons:
The first goes to Dr. Daniel Sakyi, the supervisor of this thesis, with whose guidance,
constructive criticisms, and suggestions this work has become successful.
The contributions of Mr. Eric Opoku and Mr. Mustapha Immurana in designing the
research are gratefully acknowledged..
Another appreciation goes to all my respondents. It is their contributions that provided
the results of this work. I am very grateful for the entire field assistants of the
Regional and Metro Staff of Ghana Education Service, Kumasi.
Also, the contribution of my siblings who supported my studies on uncountable ways
cannot be forgotten.
Last but not the least, the diverse support my family my and friends gave in doing this
study is fully acknowledged and gratified.
v
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to my parents; Late Alhaji Iddrisu and Hajia Lawratu Abdul
Rahman Ciecey. And to my lovely wife; Sa‟ada Muntari (Sacute).
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTENT PAGE
DECLARATION.......................................................................................................... ii
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................iii
ACKNOWLEGEMENT............................................................................................. iv
DEDICATION.............................................................................................................. v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... vi
LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................viii
CHAPER ONE ............................................................................................................. 1
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Background of the Study .........................................................................................1
1.2 Statement of the Problem .........................................................................................3
1.3 Research Objectives .................................................................................................4
1.4 The Research Questions ...........................................................................................4
1.5 Significance of the Study. ........................................................................................4
1.6 Scope of the Study. ..................................................................................................5
1.7 Limitation of the Study ............................................................................................5
1.8 Organization of Research .........................................................................................5
CHAPTERTWO .......................................................................................................... 6
LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................... 6
2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................6
2.2 Development of Auditing ........................................................................................6
2.2.1 Historical Background and the Ancient Auditor. ................................................. 6
2.2.2 Emerging Trends in the Auditing Environment.................................................... 8
2.3 Audit in Ghana .......................................................................................................10
2.4 The Concept of Audit Expectation Gap (AEG) .....................................................11
2.5 Theoretical Framework ..........................................................................................12
2.6 Auditors‟ Responsibility for Fraud and Errors Detection and Prevention in
Public Sector Organizations ................................................................................13
2.7 Perception of the Public about the Auditor‟s Role in the Detection and
Prevention of Fraud and Errors in Public Sector Organizations .........................16
vii
2.8 Duty to Prevent Fraud and Errors in an Organization ...........................................16
2.9 Empirical Review...................................................................................................18
CHAPTER THREE. .................................................................................................. 25
METHODOLOGY. ................................................................................................... 25
3.1 Introduction. ...........................................................................................................25
3.2 Research Design.....................................................................................................25
3.3 Population ..............................................................................................................25
3.4 Sample and sampling technique.............................................................................26
3.6 Data Analysis. ........................................................................................................26
3.7 Organizational Profile ............................................................................................27
3.7.1 Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly ......................................................................... 27
CHAPTER FOUR ...................................................................................................... 32
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS ..... 32
4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................32
4.2 Data Presentation (Using Tables) ..........................................................................32
CHAPTER FIVE ....................................................................................................... 55
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .. 55
5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................55
5.2 Summary of major findings ...................................................................................55
5.4 Conclusion .............................................................................................................56
5.5 Recommendations ..................................................................................................57
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 59
APPENDIX ................................................................................................................. 67
viii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
Table 4.1.1 Highest Academic Qualification of Respondents. .................................... 32
Table 4.1.2 Auditor‟s duty for preparing financial statement ...................................... 33
Table 4.1.3 Auditor‟s Duty for Expressing an Independent Opinion on the
Financial Statements based on their Audit. .............................................. 34
Table 4.1.4 Auditor‟s Duty to Verify Every Accounting transaction .......................... 35
Table 4.1.5 Auditor‟s Duty for detecting all fraud in an organization ........................ 36
Table 4.1.6 Auditor‟s Duty for an Effective System of Internal Control. ................... 37
Table 4.1.7 Auditor‟s Exercise of Judgment in Selection of Audit Procedures .......... 38
Table 4.1.8 Auditors‟ Additional Duty for Evaluating whether an organization is a
Going Concern ......................................................................................... 39
Table 4.1.9 Auditor‟s duty for Disclosing whether any Theft occurred
during the Financial Year. ........................................................................ 40
Table 4.1.10 Auditors are Responsible for Organizational Failure ............................. 41
Table 4.1.11 Auditors should be Financially Liable when they do not
Exercise Diligence in Handling the Accounts of an organization. ........... 42
Table 4.1.12 An Auditor is Responsible for Maintaining Public Confidence in an
Organization. ............................................................................................ 44
Table 4.1.13 Auditors are meant to Forecast Financial Profile ................................... 45
Table 4.1.14 The Audited Financial Statements are Useful in Monitoring an
Organization‟s Financial Performance ..................................................... 46
Table 4.1.15 Audit Reports Should Contain More Information About Financial
Forecast .................................................................................................... 47
Table 4.1.16 The Extent Of Assurance Given By An Auditor Is Clearly
Indicated In Audit Reports ....................................................................... 48
Table 4.1.17 Auditor Independence Can Influence The Performance Of Audit
Services .................................................................................................... 49
Table 4.1.18 When an Auditor Engages In The Provision Of Non-Audit And
Audit Services At The Same Time, Objectivity May Be Impaired .......... 50
Table 4.1.19 Provision of Audit Services Consistently For A Long Period Of
Time May Lead To Familiarity Threat ..................................................... 51
ix
Table 4.1.20 Auditors Are More Concerned With Pleasing Management .................. 52
Table 4.1.21 The Quality Of Audit Has Improved In The Recent Years .................... 53
1
CHAPER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
The controversy as to who has the mandate to discover as well as possibly prevent
fraudulent activities and errors in organizations still continue in the minds of the
general public. These controversies are as a result of differences in perception
between the general public and professionals in the auditing industry in relation to the
duty of the auditor with regards to the detection and prevention of fraudulent practices
and errors. There is an assertion that the increasing trend in the judicial proceeding
and criticism against auditing professionals can be attributable to the „audit
expectation gap‟ (Porter et al, 2001). The audit expectation gap indicates the
difference between the actual standard performance of the auditor and the various
expectations of the public concerning the auditor‟s performance to the anticipated
performance measure (Ojo, 2006). This therefore implies that the expectation gap
exist with auditors on one hand and the general public on the other hand, with respect
to the detection and prevention of fraud, errors and other irregularities.
An auditor is an independent person whose duty is to report on the accounts of an
organization. The main task of the auditor is to examine the accounts and the
underlying records giving rise to entries therein and report whether in his opinion they
properly reflect the activities of the organization, during the period under
consideration. However, the general public on the other hand sees the auditor‟s duty
to be fraud and errors detections and possible prevention. This perception regarding
fraud and errors detection and prevention and the auditor has some historical
2
background. In the 1960s for instance, many textbooks classified the main objectives
of the audit work into three folds namely:
i) to report on fairly and adequately on the financial statements, ii) to detect
fraudulent activities and errors, and iii) to preclude fraudulent activities and errors by
the deterrent and moral effect of an audit (Champ, 1993).
Martinis (1995) states that more contemporary studies have increasingly considered
inadequate performance of the audit functions as a significant cause of expectation
gap in the light of self-regulated practices of the accounting profession and very
minimal intervention stance of government. The responsibilities of the auditor in
respect of irregularities and errors are limited to the planning and performance of his
work. This happens so that he has the expectation of identifying those errors which
might impair the „truth and fairness‟ of the view given by the accounts. When
reporting on accounts, the auditor has a duty to act with the skills and care that
reasonably be expected in the circumstance having regards to Approved Auditing
Standards and Auditing Guidelines. There is always some risk that the irregularities
including fraud and errors may not be detected by the auditor.
The Internal Audit Agency Act (2003) (Act 658) reveals that in Ghana however, the
problem of detecting and preventing fraudulent activities and errors were given
greater boost with the introduction of the Act. It should be indicated that Section 2 of
the Internal Audit Act states the functions of the auditor to include setting of required
procedures and standards towards the conduct of internal audit activities in
government organizations. The Agency shall thus ensure accurate, timely and reliable
managerial, financial and operating information which are reported both internally
and externally. This implies that the Agency shall see to the facilitation in the
3
detection and prevention of fraudulent activities and errors (Internal Audit Agency
Act, 2003).
It has become very normal that the internal auditor has a great duty in the detection
and prevention of fraud and errors in public organizations and hence it has become a
norm to many organizations that if fraud should occur in the organization, it is the
irresponsibility of the internal auditor.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
There seems to be widespread claims among people especially in Ghana that most
auditors do not perform their duties well. These have created the impression that there
could be a possible audit expectation gap. Thus there could be differences between
what auditors are legally mandated to do and what the general public think they
should do as in their duty. Based on this, several studies have been done in other
countries on audit expectation gap since it could undermine the integrity of the audit
profession (examples : Gay et al. (1997) in Australia; Innes et al. (1997) in the UK;
Hojskov (1998) in Denmark; Frank et al. (2001) in the US and Best et al. (2001) in
Singapore). However, it is very surprising that, to the best of the knowledge of the
author, only one empirical study (Agyei et al. 2013) has been done on Ghana.
However given the importance of audit expectation gap to the audit profession, it is
imperative that such a topic is extensively studied empirically. Aside the above, this
study departs from Agyei et al. (2013), which sampled only auditors and stockbrokers
in Accra by looking at auditors, accountants, headmasters, storekeepers and teachers
in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana in order to investigate the existence of an audit
expectation gap in the Educational Sector.
4
1.3 Research Objectives
The study is aimed at exploring the expectation gap existing between auditors and the
general public in senior high schools in the Kumasi Metropolitan Assemble.
1. To find out whether there exists an audit expectation gap.
2. To examine the influence of reliability and duty factors on audit expectation
gap in senior high schools in the Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly.
3. To find whether independent factors influence the audit expectation gap in
senior high schools in the Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly.
1.4 The Research Questions
The questions this study is concerned with are:
1. Is there any audit expectation gap?
2. Are there any contributory effects of reliability and duty factors on expectation
gap?
3. Are there any influential effects of independent factors on expectation gap?
1.5 Significance of the Study.
Since Auditing is very important to the functioning of institutions, study on the
existence of an audit expectation gap would be helpful in the following ways,
Firstly, it will bring to bare whether there exists an audit expectation gap and if so the
extent of it.
In addition, it will bring to bare the sources or forms of audit expectation gap and
serve as a signal to policy makers on measures that can be instituted to tackle it.
Last but not the least it could serve as an important source of literature for future
studies on audit expectation gap.
5
1.6 Scope of the Study.
The main focus of the study is to identify the existence of an audit expectation gap in
Kumasi. The determinants of the gap are numerous. The study adapts the factors
looked into by Best et al. (2001) when they researched into this topic in Singapore,
considering the duty factor (the external auditor‟s duties) and reliability factor”.
Schelluch and Gay (2006) found that the trait and meaning of the „audit report
messages‟ also contribute to an audit expectation gap. This factor will be looked into
in the Ghanaian context. An additional factor called independence threat will be
looked into. The population for the study cover all public senior high schools in the
Kumasi metropolis. However, it has been limited to a sample size of 110 participants
drawn from 22 public senior high schools in the metropolis and 10 auditors.
1.7 Limitation of the Study
The major challenge was inability of the study to cover all schools in the regions and
particularly the Kumasi Metropolis.
1.8 Organization of Research
The study is structured in five different chapters. Chapter one comprises the general
background of the study, statement of the problem, the research objectives, questions,
the relevance of the study, limitation of the research, the scope and finally the
organization of the study. Chapter two reviews both theoretical and empirical
literature on the subject. Chapter three covers the research methodology that was used
to attain the research objectives. The fourth chapter covers presentation and
discussion of the findings of the study. Chapter five concludes the study and gives
some recommendations.
6
CHAPTERTWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This section of the report involves reviewing relevant concepts on the variables that
contribute to an audit expectation gap. Following this introductory section, a
development of auditing is established. Based on the review of the relevant concepts
on the audit expectation gap, hence both conceptual and theoretical frameworks were
derived. The chapter further reviewed scholarly work on the historical background of
auditing, duties of the auditor, aims and objectives for auditing in Ghana.
2.2 Development of Auditing
2.2.1 Historical Background and the Ancient Auditor.
According to Flint (1998), the phenomenon of auditing dates back to the medieval
ages. There was the essence of managing affairs of organizations or individuals at the
early stages of civilization by putting in place measures to oversee the financial
aspect of their businesses to propel businesses to have total dominion over the „where
from‟ and how spent‟ aspects of funds in the business (Association of Accountancy
Bodies in West Africa (ABWA), 2012).
Scholarly works revealed that people in ancient Egypt and Rome, were tasked to
review works carried out by tax collectors and estate managers. It is further
researched that during the era of medieval Britain, independent people were employed
to ensure that the returns from tenant farmers accurately reflected revenues received
from the estate. In that era, there was much attention on detecting fraud and other
irregular acts (Gul et al, 1994).
7
To this end the financial statements prepared by the businesses were entrusted to
independent trusted individual(s) who undertook a thorough check of the „accounts‟ –
The checking procedure involved the attendance of the accounting party at a hearing
before the independent arbitrator appointed by the interested parties for the accounts
to be „‟heard‟‟ by him, and he, in turn, gave his opinion by issuing an oral report for
the information of the interested parties.
This historical background of auditing spells out the inherent qualities of an auditor
(i.e. honesty, integrity, respectability, independent of mind, among others), which the
accountancy profession still upholds today. According to Brown (1962), the word
„audit‟ is a coined word from the Latin word „audire‟ meaning simply „to hear‟ in line
with the historical practice of „hearing‟‟ accounts. The first auditors only had means
of listening to oral reports of mandated professionals or individuals and confirmed or
denied the accuracy of the reports.
Also, other developments about the auditing profession have transformed the mode
and nature of auditing. This has made the discipline highly demanding and perverted.
Furthermore, the role of auditors over the centuries, as the verifiers of formal reports
developed to include that of verifying written records. Double entry bookkeeping
particularly in the sixteenth century had evolved to the point where Luca Pacioli had it
written in the first known book on „bookkeeping‟. He further recommended the
records of accounting to be verified by other auditors.
Thus auditors were appointed as independent professionals to specifically investigate,
detect and report on organizations‟ failures as well as providing measures to address
them. This occurred in the early nineteenth century.
8
According to Teck-Heang and Ali (2008), modern means of auditing started in mid
1800s in the United Kingdom when the Joint Stock Companies Act was enacted. With
this, mandated directors of companies reported to shareholders through the balance
sheet. Auditors were not required to be accountants nor independent. In 1900
however, a new Companies Act was put in place to give mandate to organizations to
appoint independent auditors. The discussion thus reveals that, the issue of having
independent auditors has been in existence over a century.
2.2.2 Emerging Trends in the Auditing Environment
Having seen the rapid changes in the economic environment (as well as business),
auditing and accounting activities ought to catch up with these changes so as to
address any challenges that would emerge as a result of the changes. Thus, there have
been various activities that have defined the auditing and accounting profession in
these years. For instance, due to the expansion of statutory provisions, the avenues for
having in place auditing practices have also grown largely. This phenomenon has
informed market regulatory bodies to improve upon their duty in the auditing and
accounting practices. This also requires financial auditors to formally enroll
companies on recognized platforms.
Also, these changes in the discipline have led to improvement in activities of audit
markets and their functions. Their activities have significantly expanded and led to the
growth of international security markets to monitor and regulate the activities of
organisations or businesses.
Further, the advancement in information technology has directly impacted on the
auditing and accounting environment, as well as their practices. Thus the auditing and
9
accounting environment and scope have been influenced greatly by these recent
developments in technologies.
Turley and Cooper (2005) indicate that there is the need to meet the demands of the
public when it comes to variations in information and communication technologies,
stock and financial markets in the auditing profession. Therefore, professionals ought
to learn more, update themselves and be in tune with evolving needs of the market,
statutory regulations, and the forms of services to be rendered to clients, and meeting
set auditing and accounting standards among others.
There were however measures to address some of the emerged challenges during the
early part of the century, particularly in the United States. Prominent among the
challenges were the emergence of corporate financial standards, irregular and wrong
report practices in the 1929 stock market which led to the Great Depression and crash
of the stock market in the United States.
There were then enactments to mandate companies that were then on the United
States stock market to accommodate both balance sheet statements and profit/loss
statements.
There were also efforts to address the challenge by requiring the formation of auditing
committees, which was to be made up of no-executive directors and other appointees
(auditors) who were to be accepted by stakeholders.
There was also a major challenge when the States witnessed numerous failures in
businesses as well as failures in auditing practices. The United States thus regulated
the formation a Commission (Cohen) and subsequently followed the stated
recommendations of the Commission. The recommendations was implemented and
10
instituted until the period when there were criticisms about the auditing practices of
professionals, which included the autonomy of the auditor. This led to the collapse of
the then major accounting firm; Enron, and its auditor, Arthur Anderson.
2.3 Audit in Ghana
In Ghana, the company‟s code, 1963, Act 179 introduced compulsory audit
requirement. In accordance with Section 124(1c) of the Ghana‟s Company Act, 1963,
Act179, the auditors‟ report should be part of every organization‟s account before it
can be distributed to the relevant stakeholders. The implication is that, every
organization is mandated to have an auditor.
The appointed auditor is also anticipated to have a view on the truthfulness as well as
fairness of the income statement and the statement of financial position. These are to
be made available by the directors of the organisations and made available to all
stakeholders during annual general meetings.
The companies code,1963,Act 179 states who qualifies to be appointed as auditor for
private companies (Sec 270) or public companies (Sec 296).The modern auditor
therefore should have qualification and skill in the use of the principles of book-
keeping as well as expert knowledge of general business affairs to be able to cope
with his new responsibilities.
To be qualified to be appointed as an auditor in Ghana in accordance with the
company‟s code, 1963, Act 179, one must have adequate accountancy training which
normally involves passing the qualifying examinations of ICAG as a first step,
followed by specified number of years‟ of practical experience in accountancy to be
able to gain admission into membership of the body. The next hurdle to be cleared
which will give the individual the authority to practice as an accountant, and for that
11
matter as auditor, is the completion of a specified period of training under a qualified
and experienced practicing accountant. Even after this, a qualified accountant is still
required to undertake a continuing professional development (CPD) and training so as
to keep to the high professional standards of accountants and to keep abreast with
current developments.
2.4 The Concept of Audit Expectation Gap (AEG)
Audit Expectation Gap according to Liggio (1974) and Lee et al (2010) has played
important role particularly in the 1970s and still continues to be very important in the
field of auditing and accounting. During the early parts of the 19th
century, there came
up heated criticism and unfavorable judgment from the public about the accounting
profession, due to unanticipated failures in the corporate world. This has made the
audit expectation gap an emerging topic in recent times. There have thus been such
research works by authors in most developed countries, such as Frank et al (2001) in
the United States, Innes et al (2007) in the United Kingdom, Hojskov(1998) in
Denmark, Gay et al (1997) in Australia, Porter (1993) in New Zealand and Best et
(2001) in Singapore. These studies were done in the respective countries as a result of
the happenings in issues of corporate, financial and audit failures, and subsequently,
the influence of the challenges on the profession.
Lee (1970) and Beck (1974) established the core objectives for academic and
professional research on audit expectation gaps. They did this by identifying and
critically assessing the responsibilities that are expected from auditors. The survey
instrument used (questionnaire) was aimed at capturing the perception and awareness
of people on the core mandates of auditors in general. It was Liggio who envisioned
12
the changing responsibilities of the auditors and championed or established the
theoretical backing of the audit expectation gap concept.
McEnroe and Martens (2001) indicates that, audit expectation gap is the difference
between the perceptions of people, particularly financial statement clients, about the
roles or duties of the auditor and the roles and duties from the point of view of
auditors. Beelde et al. (2005) asserts that professionals within the accounting and
auditing profession have varied views of the term external auditing.
The negative thoughts of the general society about the roles of the auditors in
promoting fair and truthfulness in financial statement preparations, lead to what
Maccarone (1993) term, „the legal liability crisis facing the accounting profession.
Expectation gap is popularly used to denote a state where there exist difference(s) in
the expectation or perception about the work of an auditor (Adeyemi and Uadiale,
2011).
Thus, the perception of the general public of the roles of the auditor is different from
that if the professional. This is what authors refer to as the expectation gap. The term
according to Trauth et al (1993) is often used to explain the perceptions of the
information systems industry relating to the academic preparation of graduates.
2.5 Theoretical Framework
The theoretical description on whether there exists an audit expectation gap or not is
best explained by the role theory. According to the theory, the professional (auditor)
is regarded to occupy a position of professional status within the social system.
Auditors as a result of their status are mandated to abide by the ethical considerations
which are defined by the societal system. Davidosn (1975) posits that, failure of
13
auditors to abide by the stipulated or given responsibilities or meet the expected duties
generate risks of social action to enforce conformity and to penalize nonconformity‟.
Davidson(1975), further argues that the duty of the auditor is dependent on the
interactions of the normative expectations of the various interest clusters in the
society, which have either direct or indirect relationship to the position of the
auditor.
Lastly, Davidson (1975) indicated that the various clusters of users in a way have
different expectations about auditors and that they (expectations) are likely to change
over time. This change is subject to the re-specification of their own role
requirements and also the interaction of other factors within the society. Thus,
the auditors are placed in multi-role and multi expectation positions.
2.6 Auditors’ Responsibility for Fraud and Errors Detection and Prevention in
Public Sector Organizations
The question of whose duty it is to detect and prevent fraud and errors in the public
sector organization is one of the most debated issues in our field of study today,
especially in the eye of the public and other stakeholders. One school of thought,
especially the business community and the general public are of the opinion that
auditors should occupy positions to better detect and prevent fraud and errors. They
argue that the issue at stake has been one of the main purposes of an audit until
recently. They are of the opinion that the shift in emphases has only been in recent
time, that fraud detection has been abandoned as the major objective (Martins, 1995).
As a result, it is not surprising that many persons in the public would still believe that
an audit in the public sector is concerned with the detection and prevention of fraud
and errors in particular. In this vain, there does not appear to be both realistic and
14
legal basis for the profession or stands having moved from the position of accepting
duty for the detection of fraud to one where it is primarily concerned with satisfying
itself that the entity‟s internal control is effective (Martins, 1995).
On the other hand, the emphasis of the auditing profession responsibilities do not
necessitate the auditor to specifically identify fraud and errors unless required by
status or the specific terms in his letter of engagement. The primary aim of an audit is
to allow the auditor to form and express an independent and expert view on financial
statements. The opinion expressed is usually as to whether or not the auditor believes
that the statements of finance truly depict the opinion and financial position of an
enterprise. However, the likelihood of fraud that until otherwise revealed distorted the
results showed by the financial statements. This call for the need to ensure that the
auditor puts in practical measures to enable him detect any irregularities with regards
to the financial statements, so as to address them positively and have a better
outcome.
With the introduction of Statement on Auditing Standard No. 99 (SAS no.99) by
auditing standard board, auditors would have to go through diverse and detailed steps
for the detection of fraud as and when they are implemented. This is to enable the
professional take into consideration fraudulent activities, so as to blend that into the
auditing procedures and update it periodically until completion. The Statement on
Auditing Standard No. 99 explains the procedure for the auditor to go through. These
are outlined as: to gather relevant information to reveal the associated risks of
misstatement that come as a result of fraud; to ascertain the foretasted risks when he
has taken notice of the necessary evaluation acts of the entity‟s programs and control;
and lastly to have adequate response to the findings to be revealed.
15
It should be noted that the professional (auditor) under the SAS has to collect and pay
attention to wider information in order to assess the fraud risks in detail, than what
existed in the earlier periods.
It further requires auditors to have in mind the essence to subdue tendencies that
would affect their profession; relying so much on the biases and views of clients,
which make them, have a skeptical perception about the auditing profession. The
professional must however not have the presumptions that, his clients will treat him
and the profession honestly. This is to enable the auditor render his services
professionally to the satisfaction of everyone.
The Statement on Auditing Standard No. 99 provides the avenue to enable
professionals in the auditing and accounting discipline to carry out their
responsibilities positively and efficiently. It seeks to explore into other areas of the
auditing profession, so as to streamline activities of auditors in a better way. This is to
help do away with the “checklist mentality” but rather introduce and improve upon
effective auditing and accounting practice.
According to the Journal of Accountancy (2003), the recent standard for addressing
fraud, is a major component of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA‟s) comprehensive antifraud and corporate duty program. Some fraud-related
measures were first clearly spelt out in the speech of the AICPA President and CEO
Barry C. Mel ancon delivered to the Yale Club in New York. He indicated that
AICPA was committed to strengthening the confidence of investors. This was to be
done through improving upon the good quality of the profession as well as reinforce
the core values of the discipline. These measures bring up a practice where the
detection and prevention of fraudulent activities are the duty of every organization,
16
auditing and accounting professionals, as well as corporate America and the financial
reporting community (Journal of Accountancy 2003).
2.7 Perception of the Public about the Auditor’s Role in the Detection and
Prevention of Fraud and Errors in Public Sector Organizations
There is the assertion that audit expectation gap comes about as result of a rise in the
litigation and criticism against the duties of the auditors. This is significant to the
discipline due to the fact that when the expectation of society and clients are not met,
the credibility, honor and potential earnings associated with the profession are
lowered. Sadly, these differences in perception of the general public about the
accounting and auditing profession with reference to the duty of the auditor regarding
fraud and other irregularities still persist. The public expects the auditor to prevent
and detect fraud and other irregularities in the financial statements on which opinion
has been issued to be true and fair.
When reporting on accounts, the auditor has a duty to act with skill and care that
would reasonably be expected in the circumstances having regarded to approve
Auditing Standard and General Guidelines. There is always some risk that
irregularities including fraud and errors may not be detected by the auditor. For
instance, a connived fraud by the employees may go undetected by the auditor.
2.8 Duty to Prevent Fraud and Errors in an Organization
One of the considerable advantages arising from an audit is the detection and
prevention of fraud and errors. Without correcting errors, the account will not depict a
true and fair view. At times what one imagines or thinks to be an error may be due to
fraudulent manipulation of figures, books and documents. It is therefore very
necessary that the auditor examines carefully the cause of genuine errors and other
17
irregularities. This does however not mean that the sole duty towards detecting and
preventing errors laid in the bosom of the auditors.
The elemental obligation for detecting and preventing, errors and other irregularities
rest with relevant managerial bodies or agencies. Management in this context is
defined as any person other than the shareholder who acts on behalf of the
organization. In addition to their business responsibilities, the management have the
(a) duty to safeguard the organization‟s assets because they are reckoned by law as
performing in a stewardship capacity of the property under their control. The
management is also required under the company‟s code to keep proper books of
accounts and prepare accounts which give a vivid position of the organization‟s
activities within a given period of time.
Management should exercise their duty primarily by the institution and operating of
an effective system of internal control which may include internal accounting control,
management control and internal audit unit. The trait and effectiveness of systems of
internal control within the organization can help improve the efficiency of the
financial system and any other system or otherwise of the organization. The presence
of substantial internal control mechanisms reduce the probability of errors and
fraudulent activities in the organization.
The duty of the auditor in respect to fraud and other irregularities are limited to the
planning and performing of his work so that he has a fair anticipation in the detection
of the errors that have the tendency of inhibiting the fairness of the activities of the
profession. To discharge this duty, the auditor should seek a reasonable assurance that
such fraud and errors or irregularities have not occurred or that if they have occurred,
they have been either corrected or properly reflected in the accounts (Salehi, 2007).
18
When reporting on accounts, the auditor has a duty to undertake the activity with the
skill that would be reasonably expected in the circumstance having regard to
Approved Auditing Standards and Guidelines. There is always some risk that
irregularities including fraud and errors may not be detected by the auditor. Whether
the auditor has adhered to such standard and guidelines is determined by the adequacy
of the process which is adopted in the context and the suitability of the audit report
based on the laid down processes (Sokchea, 2015; SAS, 2004).
Most text books made it clear that the purpose of an audit is the expression of an
independent view on the financial statement of an entity. According to Accounting
Standard Board SAS No. 1 (1998), the auditor has the mandate to plan and undertake
auditing of accounts to obtaining a fair confidence on whether the financial statements
are devoid of misstatements. However, people still have the misconception that this
has to do with detection and prevention of fraud and other irregularities. There is also
a wrong perception among the public that auditors should be able to „fish out‟ any
fraudulent dealings in the financial statements they audit. Very few believe that it is
management that is responsible for the prevention of fraud and errors, others suggests
that the auditor has more responsibility as far as fraud and errors detection are
concerned in public organizations. The duty of detecting and preventing fraud and
errors is thus the duty of everyone, the accounting and auditing professionals, Ghana
and the entire financial community.
2.9 Empirical Review
Baron et al (1977) analyzed the distinctions in observations with respect to auditor‟s
fraud finding obligations in the middle of auditors and clients of bookkeeping data in
USA. The study uncovered critical contrast between such discernments.
19
Low et al (1988) demonstrated a study on the audit expectation gap in Singapore.
Noteworthy contrasts were found in the territories of fraud counteractive action,
guaranteeing the precision of the financial statements, successful utilization of
government grants and administration productivity.
Humphrey and Turley (1992) contemplated the audit expectation gap in UK with
respect to the role of auditors through a progression of unstructured interviews,
questionnaire and small scale contextual analyses. The studies uncovered a
unimportant level of contrasts in regards to impression of the audit functions however
critical distinction between auditors and respondents with respect to their perceptions
on the part of auditors, showing the vicinity of an expectation gap.
Schelluch (1996) found that clients were for the most part despondent with the
pretended by the auditing profession, especially with respect to audit autonomy. There
was wide expectation gap in Singapore.
Dana, (2011) likewise directed a study in the general population part in Romania with
students as the respondents. The study found that there exist audit expectation gap in
Romania.
Saeidi, (2012) researched the presence of audit expectation gap desires among
auditors, monetary supervisors and financial specialists in Iran. The outcomes show
there is proof of an audit expectation gap in connection to fraud definition and
auditors‟ obligations in detecting and prevention fraud between auditors and money
related directors, and auditors and financial specialist.
Nasreen (2006) likewise led a study on students of Bangladesh. She considered two
clusters of students, first cluster did not do audit course and second cluster did one
20
audit course. Discoveries uncovered that students who finished one audit course still
had unthinkable expectation in regards to auditor‟s obligation regarding
distinguishing and forestalling misrepresentation and audit assurance. Significant
contrasts were likewise found in choice helpfulness of audited information zone.
Salehi and Azary (2008) set up that there is profound expectation gap between
auditors and bankers. This is as a consequence of bankers' unawareness of auditing
functions. They likewise found that the bankers have sensibility expectation from
auditors.
Bogdanoviciute (2011) led an exact study in the Lithuania; it was found that there
exist audit expectation gap among auditors in connection to parts and obligations of
auditors particularly on fraud counteractive action and detection, assurance and value
of the audited financial statements. The study likewise found that there is broad audit
expectation gap in Lithuania, basically because of diverse expectations with respect to
fraud recognition and lawful liabilities towards outsiders included.
Adeyemi and Uadiale in 2011 directed an overview in Nigeria to analyze the degree
of audit expectation gap in Nigeria. The study uncovered that there exist audit
expectation gap in Nigeria as respondents demonstrated that the current obligations
and obligations of auditors are not obviously characterized and are lacking and the
expectation gap was observed to be wide especially on the issues of the auditors'
obligations on fraud discovery as huge number of the respondents trusted that
auditors' obligations ought to be broadened.
Best, Buckby and Tan in 2001 discovered an expectation gap which was wide
especially in connection to the level and nature of auditor's obligations. They
observed the gap to be especially wide on the issues of the auditor's obligations
21
regarding fraud counteractive action and discovery, and the auditor's obligations
regarding support of accounting records and exercise of judgment in the
determination of audit processes.
Hudaib and Haniffa (2002) explored the vicinity of a "perception gap" in Saudi
Arabia. It was found that uniqueness in sentiments on the official and expected roles
of auditig and issues identified with audit environment in the middle of the different
clusters were obvious. The part of training in influencing the audit expectation gap
was researched by various studies.
There exist diverse literature and research works on the audit expectation gap
particularly in the developed regions around the globe. Studies by Hojskov (1998),
Gay et al. (1997), Innes et al. (1997), and Best et al (2001), among others made
dominant use of the questionnaire as the research instrument to gather empirical data.
The studies focused on examining the forms of audit expectation gaps, where they are
found and their nature, as well as the effects of the gaps on businesses and
professionals and lastly, lasting solutions to address the identified gaps.
Varied categories of respondents were covered by the aforementioned studies. For
instance, respondents like lawyers, auditors, judges were covered during Lowe‟s
(1994) study, investors by Epestein and Gregor (1994), whereas Beck (1994)
considered stakeholders, Humphrey et al., (1993) and Porter (1993) covered financial
directors, chartered accountants, investment analysts, and bankers, and lastly
financial directors and users of corporate financial statement by Benau et al.
(1993).
A research work done by Low in 1980 in Australia revealed the following results:
Lowe‟s work was aimed at examining the duties of the auditor in detecting and
22
preventing irregularities and other non-statutory acts. This was done to have a fair
idea of the capacity of the auditor to identify these risks and address the perceptions
people have about both auditing and non-auditing professionals. The study revealed a
significant relationship of the perceptions to the degree at which auditors played their
roles in detecting irregularities. Thus, the study identified an expectation gap among
the clusters; auditors and non-auditor clusters.
Another similar work was undertaken through the use of research questionnaires to
assess the gap via having a cursory look at peoples‟ opinions of the core duties and
what they expect from auditors in their day-to-day activities. This was carried out by
Humphrey et al. in 1993. The survey instrument comprises series of mini-case. The
categories of people covered by his survey were directors of companies, bankers,
accounting professionals in public sector, and investment analysts. Having undertaken
the survey, findings from it showed a significant difference between auditors and the
respondents with regards to their perceptions on the nature of the accounting and
auditing profession. The findings supported the existence of an audit expectation gap,
particularly in areas of the nature of the audit function and the perception of people on
the performance of auditors.
Similarly, Mohammed and Muhammad-Sori (2002) found the existence of audit
expectation gap in Malaysia arising from doubtfulness in the responsibilities of
auditors, the level of satisfaction with respect to the services rendered by the
professionals, and the non-autonomous nature of the professionals.
Findings from their studies were revealed to confirm studies by scholars like
Boonyanet and Ongthammakul (2006) in Thailand. These and many more works
23
were carried out by researchers to examine whether there exist expectation gaps and if
they do, the causes, nature and ways of addressing them.
Premised on the discussions above, it is deemed relevant to examine the audit
expectation gap in Ghana, taking particular cognizance of Senior High School in the
Kumasi Metropolis. The subsequent section thus presents the profile of the Kumasi
Metropolis
In 1991, the Ireland Institute of Chartered Accountants set up an ancillary
autonomous commission to study the expectation gap. The Commission‟s report
submitted in 1992 settled that there was evidence of an expectation gap which should
be addressed as matter of priority. Porter (1993) found out that the credibility of
external auditor is being highly questioned by scholars and businesses, as wide spread
criticism and litigation against auditors increase.
Some of these perceptions were revealed to be as a result of ignorance or lack of
adequate knowledge of society on issues of company laws and the standards of the
auditing profession as well as misunderstanding of the important duties of the
professionals.
Porter (1993) went further to suggest that a major way of minimizing the expectation
gap is to improve the knowledge base and understanding of the auditors‟ duties
through the provision of auditing education.
Furthermore, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Canada set up the MacDonald
Commission to study the public‟s expectation of auditing practices. The final draft of
the commission‟s report was submitted in 1988 with the conclusion that the public is
mainly ignorant of the extent of the responsibilities entrusted to auditors and this
24
made some of the most knowledgeable segment felt that their expectation were not
been fulfilled. This thus calls for the need to take efficient and effective measures to
address this gap.
Similarly, Innes et al. (1991) in his study came up with the conclusion that there
should be the provision of information on the scope of operations of auditors to
meeting the demands of their clients. Therefore, the provision of audit education has
also been recommended as a likely strategy to address this expectation gap.
According to Sikka et al (1992), the initial strategy at eliminating the expectation gap
calls for steps to ensure that the objectives of the auditing practice be streamlined
effectively and made open, accountable, democratic and autonomous.
A study was led in Ghana by Agyei A, Aye K. B, Owusu-Yeboah E (2013), the study
found that there exist audit expectation gap in Ghana, especially concerning auditor
obligation identifying with fraud discovery and deterrence, and soundness of internal
control structure of the audited entity. The analysts suggest that the audit calling and
controllers ought to detail such benchmarks, standards and regulations that might
enough guide the auditors to satisfy the sensible expectation of different client
bunches.
This study departs from Agyei et al. (2013), which sampled only auditors and
stockbrokers in Accra by looking at auditors, accountants, headmasters, storekeepers
and teachers in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana in order to investigate the existence
of an audit expectation gap in the Educational Sector.
25
CHAPTER THREE.
METHODOLOGY.
3.1 Introduction.
This chapter frameworks the particular research methodology and provides details of
procedures that were employed to achieve the objectives of the study. The chapter
looked at the research design, the population for the research, sample and sampling
technique, the instrument for the study, as well as method of data analysis.
3.2 Research Design
The type of research design employed in this research work was a survey. A survey
design here is a fact-finding type of research design with the aid of questionnaire and
it describes the prevailing conditions that are in existence at a particular point in a
certain time period. Two methods of collecting information were used for the research
design. The primary data information was collected from the field by using
questionnaire. In this case, a cross sectional survey questionnaire design was used in
providing answers to the main research questions. Interviews were an addition used
by the researcher in collecting data for the research work.
3.3 Population
For the purpose of this research work, the population was confined to the staff of
public senior high schools and auditors within the Kumasi Metropolis. The staff in
this context refers to the management of various public senior high schools, the
accountants, administrators, other non-teaching staff as well as teachers. The total
population for the purpose of this study was 2643, thus the entire staff of the 22 public
senior high schools in the Kumasi metropolis.
26
3.4 Sample and sampling technique
For the sake of convenience, the researcher took a sample of 120 participants. Each
school was represented by 5 participants. The selection of the 5 participants was
conveniently done by stratified sampling as follows: The Headmaster, the accountant,
the storekeeper, and two teachers, in addition 10 external auditors were selected to
make the total sample size of 120
There sample size is represented mathematically as follows:
SS= (SS1*N) +A
Where SS=Sample size
SS1= Number of participants per school
A= Number of auditors that participated
N= Number of senior high schools
(5*22)+10 = SS
110+10 = SS
SS= 120
Out of 120 sampled respondents, the author could not retrieve 5 questionnaires from
outfit of Headmasters and hence making the sample size 115.
3.6 Data Analysis.
The data was entered into computer and analysed with the Statistical Package for
Services and Solutions (SPSS) using cross tabulations.
27
3.7 Organizational Profile
3.7.1 Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly
Location
The Kumasi Metropolis is about 270km north from Accra, the nation‟s capital.
Kumasi lies amid latitudes 6.35o and 6.40
o and longitudes 1.30
o and 1.35
o. It has
elevation range between 250 and 300 meters above sea level. Kumasi Metropolis has
a land area of approximately 254sq/km and ten (10) kilometers in radius with a
population mass of 9434 individuals per sq. km. The Metropolis has about 119
communities (Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly, 2013).
Demography
Kumasi is regarded the most populous city in Ashanti Region. According to GSS
(2012), the Metropolis in the year 2010 had a population of 2,035,064 people and a
rate of growth of 4.8% p.a. In 2013, the population of Kumasi was estimated at
2,396,458.
Sex Structure
There are more females (52.22%) in the Metropolis than male (47.78%). Majority of
the population (52.7%) are below 15 years while the remaining 47.3% are above 15
years.
Household Sizes/Characteristics
According to the Ghana Statistical Service (GSS, 2012), Kumasi Metropolis has an
average household size of 5.1. This high average household size is attributable to the
larger number of people in the Metropolis.
28
Rural Urban Split
Kumasi Metropolis has 46%, 48%, and 6% of its towns being peri-urban, urban, and
rural respectively. It is regarded the most populous among all Metropolitan,
Municipal and District Assemblies in Ghana.
The Local Economy
(a) Main Economic Activities
It is estimated that about 86% of residents, particularly active age cluster in the
Metropolis is economically active. Service, Agriculture and Industry are the major
economic activities that proved source of livelihood to people in the Metropolis.
The Service Sector
The sector is regarded as the major economic development avenue of the Kumasi
Metropolis. Approximately 72 percent of the economically active age cluster are
found in or employed by the sector. The Service sector has positioned Kumasi to be
an important center for diverse commercial activities in Ghana; basically wholesale
and retail businesses. The commercial activities are indicated to entail the sale of
various types of goods like office and educational stationeries, clothing, food stuffs,
and building materials. The need for adjunct services to complement the existing
economic activities in the Kumasi Metropolis has called for investments from
other significant service providers. Thus, the banking and insurance sectors in line
with other significant outfits have enabled significantly the creation of sound
economic environment for the development and growth of the Metropolis. Other
telecommunication and transport services are also revealed to be contributing greatly
to the development through revenue generation and creation of employment.
29
The Industrial Sector
The Kumasi Metropolis is noted to have wide range of industrial activities, mostly
small-scale in nature. The industrial sector has contributed enormously to the creation
of gainful employment to about 23percent of the active age cluster and revenue
generation. The Suame Magazine is regarded the largest mechanical garage in the
West African Region. This and Asafo mechanical garages have contributed positively
in the creation of employment and generation of revenue to the Assembly.
There are also other industries that have been noted to contribute positively to the
economic development of the Metropolis, through creation of jobs and providing
sources of income and livelihood for the labour force. These include the beverage
industries.
There exist also, other wood processing and manufacturing industries in the
Metropolis. These are largely in micro, small, medium and large scale in nature and
size. These provide sustainable sources of livelihood to the employees and employers
in the Metropolis.
The Agricultural Sector
The agricultural sector comprises food and livestock farming. Food farming is mostly
small scale staple food crops. Large volumes of the foodstuffs are imported from
other adjoining districts and as well as distant areas.
Major Infrastructure
The major infrastructure comprises the economic infrastructure notably the marketing
facilities, energy, telecommunications and transport infrastructure.
30
The marketing facilities are the major commercial centers within the Metropolis. The
large commercial areas are notably the “Kumasi Central Market, Bantama market,
Kejetia Terminal, Adum Shopping Centre, Suame and Asafo Magazine, Kaase
/Asokwa Industrial Enclave, Sokoban Wood Village among others” (KMA, 2013).
The dominant energy forms and sources of fuel are electricity, biofuels, LPG, and
kerosene.
Transportation
There exist varied travel modes in the Metropolis. There thus exists three major modal
means of travel to various parts of the Metropolis. These include air, rail and road
travel. With respect to road transport, Kumasi Metropolis presently has a total length
of road network of 1,921 km, which links almost all parts of the country. The road
networks are broadly collectors, arterials and local roads which link various
communities to others.
The Metropolis has eight major arterials which take care of movement in and out of
the Metropolis. The arterials are Barekase, Buokrom, Bosomtwe, Ejisu, Obuais,
Sunyani, Mampong, and Offinso routes. These arteries further have quite a number of
collectors which takes traffic volume from the local roads to primary roads.
Health Care and Educational Infrastructure
The Kumasi Metropolis has Metropolitan Health Services which has about 5 Sub
Metro-Health Services.
The educational infrastructure in the Metropolis have both public and private
providers who have stake in developing the educational infrastructure. The private
providers consist of individual and other religious bodies.
31
Structure of the Assembly
Act 462 & LI 1614 of 1989 established KMA to manage the city. The General
Assembly consists of 145 members made up of 92 elected, 43 appointed, 10 Members
of Parliament and a Chief Executive. The Assembly has 9 Sub-Metros, 21 and 92
town councils and Unit Committees respectively.
32
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the findings and analysis of data on the five participants based
on their responses on duty factors, reliability factors as well as independence factor
with respect to expectation gap in the work of auditors.
4.2 Data Presentation (Using Tables)
The following tables are the results of data collected from the field survey. The
responses of the auditors are compared with that of accountants, storekeepers,
headmasters and teachers.
Table 4.1.1 Highest Academic Qualification of Respondents.
Occupation.
Highest
Level of
Education
Auditors. Headmasters Accountants. Storekeepers Teachers Total.
WASSCE 0 0 0 0 0 0
HND 3 0 0 15 0 18
BSc. 2 5 5 4 24 40
BA 1 4 7 3 12 26
MBA 4 2 8 0 4 20
MSc. 0 6 2 0 4 12
PhD. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
33
From the table above, out of the 10 auditors who responded, 3 were HND holders, 2
had their BSc. 1 was BA holder and 4 were MBA holders. Concerning the 17
headmasters who responded, 5 were BSc. holders, 4 persons had BA and 2 had MBA
degrees, 6 persons had MSc. Concerning the 22 storekeepers 15 are HND holders, 4
had BSc, and 3 had BA degree. Concerning the 22 accountants 5 had BSc. Degree, 7
had BA, 8 had MBA degree and 2 had MSc. Degree. With regards to the 44 teachers
who responded, 24 had BSc. 12 had BA, 4 had MBA and 4 others had MSc. degree.
Table 4.1.2 Auditor’s duty for preparing financial statement
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
7 3 13 14 16 53
Disagree 1 1 1 2 1 6
Agree 1 7 2 3 1 14
Strongly
Agree
1 6 6 3 26 42
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.2, concerning the auditors with regards to the preparation of financial
statements as their duty, 7 strongly disagreed that they prepare financial statements, 1
disagreed, 1 agreed and 1 said he strongly agrees. Thus from the above, majority of
the auditors strongly disagreed that it is their duty to prepare financial statements. On
the part of the headmasters concerning the preparation of financial statements as the
duty of auditors, 3 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 7 agreed and 6 strongly agreed. On
the part of the accountants, 13 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 2 agreed, and 6
34
strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 14 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 3
agreed, and 3 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 16 strongly
disagreed, 1 disagreed, 1 agreed, and 26 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the preparation of financial statement as a duty of auditors, it was
found that there was no expectation gap between auditors on one hand and
headmasters and accountants on another hand but an expectation gap was found
between auditors on one hand and storekeepers and teachers on another hand.
Table 4.1.3 Auditor’s Duty for Expressing an Independent Opinion on the
Financial Statements based on their Audit.
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
0 0 0 0 0 0
Disagree 0 2 0 1 0 3
Agree 1 3 5 5 5 19
Strongly
Agree
9 12 17 16 39 93
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.3, concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty for
expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements based on their audit,
none strongly disagreed that is the auditor‟s duty to express an independent opinion
on financial statements, none also disagreed, 1 agreed and 9 said they strongly agree.
Thus from the above, majority of the auditors strongly agreed that is the auditor‟s
duty to express an independent opinion on financial statements. On the part of the
headmasters concerning the auditor‟s duty for expressing an independent opinion on
35
financial statements as the duty of auditors, none strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 3
agreed and 12 strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants, none strongly
disagreed, none also disagreed, 5 agreed, and 17 strongly agreed. On the part of the
storekeepers, none strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 5 agreed, and 16 strongly agreed.
Finally on the part of the teachers, none strongly disagreed, none also disagreed, 5
agreed, and 39 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning expressing an independent opinion on financial statements as the
duty of the auditor, it was found that there was no expectation gap between auditors
on one hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on another
hand.
Table 4.1.4 Auditor’s Duty to Verify Every Accounting transaction
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
4 0 1 3 1 9
Disagree 4 3 2 2 2 13
Agree 1 6 10 9 11 37
Strongly
Agree
1 8 9 8 30 56
Total 10 17 22 22 22 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.4, concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty to verify
every accounting transaction, 4 strongly disagreed that it is the auditor‟s duty to verify
every accounting transaction, 4 disagreed, 1 agreed and 1 said he strongly agrees.
Thus from the above, majority of the auditors strongly disagreed or disagreed that it is
36
their duty to verify every accounting transaction. On the part of the headmasters
concerning the auditor‟s duty to verify every accounting transaction, none strongly
disagreed, 3 disagreed, 6 agreed and 8 strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants,
1 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 10 agreed, and 9 strongly agreed. On the part of the
storekeepers, 3 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 8 strongly agreed.
Finally on the part of the teachers, 1 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 11 agreed, and
30 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty to verify every
accounting transaction, it was found that there was an expectation gap between
auditors on one hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on
another hand.
Table 4.1.5 Auditor’s Duty for detecting all fraud in an organization
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
6 2 3 3 1 15
Disagree 3 3 4 3 7 20
Agree 1 4 10 9 23 47
Strongly
Agree
0 8 5 7 13 33
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.5, concerning the auditors with regards to auditor‟s duty of detecting
all fraud in an organization, 6 strongly disagreed that it is auditor‟s duty for detecting
all fraud in an organization, 3 disagreed, 1 agreed and none strongly agreed. Thus
37
from the above, majority of the auditors strongly disagreed that it is the auditor‟s duty
for detecting all fraud in an organization. On the part of the headmasters concerning
the auditor‟s duty for detecting all fraud in an organization as the duty of auditors, 2
strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 4 agreed and 8 strongly agreed. On the part of the
accountants, 3 strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed, 10 agreed, and 5 strongly agreed. On
the part of the storekeepers, 3 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 7
strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 1 strongly disagreed, 7 disagreed,
23 agreed, and 13 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to auditor‟s duty for detecting all fraud in
an organization, it was found that there was an expectation gap between auditors on
one hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on another hand.
Table 4.1.6 Auditor’s Duty for an Effective System of Internal Control.
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
5 1 2 3 3 14
Disagree 3 1 5 3 2 14
Agree 1 7 9 9 20 46
Strongly
Agree
1 8 6 7 19 41
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.6, concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty for an
effective system of internal control, 5 strongly disagreed that it is the auditor‟s duty to
ensure an effective system of internal control, 3 disagreed, 1 agreed and 1 strongly
38
agreed. Thus from the above, majority of the auditors strongly disagreed that it is the
auditor‟s duty for an effective system of internal control to be established. On the part
of the headmasters concerning the auditor‟s duty for an effective system of internal
control, 1 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 7 agreed and 8 strongly agreed. On the part
of the accountants, 2 strongly disagreed, 5 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 6 strongly agreed.
On the part of the storekeepers, 3 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 7
strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 3 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed,
20 agreed, and 19 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty for an effective system
of internal control, it was found that there was an expectation gap between auditors on
one hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on another hand.
Table 4.1.7 Auditor’s Exercise of Judgment in Selection of Audit Procedures
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
1 2 2 2 2 9
Disagree 1 1 1 3 4 10
Agree 3 8 11 9 18 49
Strongly
Agree
5 6 8 8 20 47
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.7, concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty in the
exercise of judgment in selecting audit procedures, 1 strongly disagreed that it is
auditor‟s duty to exercise judgment in selecting of audit procedures, 1 disagreed, 3
39
agreed and 5 said they strongly agreed. Thus from the above, majority of the auditors
agreed that it is their duty to exercise judgment in selecting audit procedures. On the
part of the headmasters concerning the auditor‟s duty to exercise judgment in
selecting audit procedures, 2 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 8 agreed and 8 strongly
agreed. On the part of the accountants, 2 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 11 agreed,
and 8 strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 2 strongly disagreed, 3
disagreed, 9 agreed, and 8 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 2
strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed, 18 agreed, and 20 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty in exercising judgment
in selecting audit procedures, it was found that there was no expectation gap between
auditors on one hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on
another hand.
Table 4.1.8 Auditors’ Additional Duty for Evaluating whether an organization is
a Going Concern
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly Disagree 0 1 5 2 0 8
Disagree 1 3 2 2 5 12
Agree 4 8 8 11 21 52
Strongly Agree 5 5 7 7 18 42
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.8, concerning the auditors with regards to auditors‟ additional duty for
evaluating whether an organization is a going concern, none strongly disagreed that it
is auditors‟ additional duty for evaluating whether an organization is a going concern,
40
1 disagreed, 4 agreed and 5 said they strongly agreed. Thus from the above, majority
of the auditors strongly agreed that it is auditors‟ additional duty for evaluating
whether an organization is a going concern. On the part of the headmasters
concerning auditors‟ additional duty for evaluating whether an organization is a going
concern, 1 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 8 agreed and 5 strongly agreed. On the
part of the accountants, 5 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 8 agreed, and 7 strongly
agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 2 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 11 agreed,
and 7 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, none strongly disagreed, 5
disagreed, 21 agreed, and 18 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to auditors‟ additional duty for evaluating
whether an organization is a going concern, it was found that there was no expectation
gap between auditors on one hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and
storekeepers on another hand.
Table 4.1.9 Auditor’s duty for Disclosing whether any Theft occurred during the
Financial Year.
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly Disagree 7 2 3 0 2 8
Disagree 1 0 4 2 8 18
Agree 1 6 5 7 18 40
Strongly Agree 1 9 10 13 16 49
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.9, concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty for
disclosing whether any theft occurred during the financial year, 7 strongly disagreed,
41
1 disagreed, 1 agreed and 1 said he strongly agrees. Thus from the above, majority of
the auditors strongly disagreed that it is auditor‟s duty to disclose whether any theft
occurred during the financial year. On the part of the headmasters concerning the
auditor‟s duty for disclosing whether any theft occurred during the financial year, 2
strongly disagreed, none disagreed, 6 agreed and 9 strongly agreed. On the part of the
accountants, 3 strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed, 5 agreed, and 10 strongly agreed. On
the part of the storekeepers, none strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 7 agreed, and 13
strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 2 strongly disagreed, 8 disagreed,
18 agreed, and 16 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to the auditor‟s duty for disclosing whether
any theft occurred during the financial year, it was found that there was an
expectation gap between auditors on one hand and the non-auditor group
(headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers) on another hand..
Table 4.1.10 Auditors are Responsible for Organizational Failure
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
8 1 3 6 11 29
Disagree 1 3 8 8 15 35
Agree 0 5 4 5 10 24
Strongly
Agree
1 8 7 3 8 27
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
42
From Table 4.1.10, concerning the auditors with regards to whether auditors are
responsible for business failure, 8 strongly disagreed that auditors are responsible for
business failure, 1 disagreed, none agreed and 1 strongly agreed. Thus from the
above, majority of the auditors strongly disagreed that auditors are responsible for
business failure. On the part of the headmasters concerning whether auditors are
responsible for business failure, 1 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 5 agreed and 8
strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants, 3 strongly disagreed, 8 disagreed, 4
agreed, and 7 strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 6 strongly disagreed, 8
disagreed, 5 agreed, and 3 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 11
strongly disagreed, 15 disagreed, 10 agreed, and 8 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to whether auditors are responsible for
business failure, it was found that there was no expectation gap between auditors on
one hand and the non-auditors (storekeepers, accountants, and teachers) on another
hand but an expectation gap was found between auditors and headmasters on auditors
being responsible for business failure.
Table 4.1.11 Auditors should be Financially Liable when they do not Exercise
Diligence in Handling the Accounts of an organization.
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
1 2 2 3 2 10
Disagree 3 5 2 1 2 13
Agree 6 7 8 10 16 47
Strongly
Agree
0 3 10 8 24 45
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
43
From Table 4.1.1, concerning the auditors with regards to auditors should be
financially liable when they do not exercise diligence in handling the accounts of an
organization, 1 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 6 agreed and none strongly agreed.
Thus from the above, majority of the auditors agreed that auditors should be
financially liable when they do not exercise diligence in handling the accounts of an
organization. On the part of the headmasters concerning whether auditors should be
financially liable when they do not exercise diligence in handling the accounts of an
organization, 2 strongly disagreed, 5 disagreed, 7 agreed and 3 strongly agreed. On
the part of the accountants, 2 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 8 agreed, and 10
strongly disagreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 3 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed,
10 agreed, and 10 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 2 strongly
disagreed, 2 disagreed, 16 agreed, and 24 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to auditors should be financially liable
when they do not exercise diligence in handling the accounts of an organization, it
was found that there was no expectation gap between auditors on one hand and the
headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on another hand..
44
Table 4.1.12 An Auditor is Responsible for Maintaining Public Confidence in an
Organization.
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
0 1 4 6 1 12
Disagree 1 1 3 2 2 9
Agree 8 8 8 6 16 45
Strongly
Agree
1 7 7 8 26 49
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.12, concerning the auditors with regards to auditor being responsible
for maintaining public confidence in an organization, none strongly disagreed, 1
disagreed, 8 agreed and 1 said he strongly agrees. Thus from the above, majority of
the auditors agreed that they are responsible for maintaining public confidence in an
organization. On the part of the headmasters concerning whether the auditor is
responsible for maintaining public confidence in an organization, 1 strongly
disagreed, 1 disagreed, 8 agreed and 7 strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants,
4 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 8 agreed, and 7 strongly agreed. On the part of the
storekeepers, 6 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 6 agreed, and 8 strongly agreed.
Finally on the part of the teachers, 1 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 16 agreed, and
26 strongly agreed.
Thus with regards to auditor being responsible for maintaining public confidence in
an organization, it was found that there was no expectation gap between auditors on
45
one hand and the non-auditor group (headmasters, accountants, teachers and
storekeepers) on another hand.
Table 4.1.13 Auditors are meant to Forecast Financial Profile
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
6 3 6 5 4 24
Disagree 2 4 4 4 9 23
Agree 2 8 10 9 19 48
Strongly
Agree
0 2 2 4 12 20
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.13, concerning the auditors with regards to whether auditors are
meant to forecast financial profile, 6 strongly disagreed that auditors are meant to
forecast financial profile, 2 disagreed, 2 agreed and none strongly agreed. Thus from
the above, majority of the auditors strongly disagreed that auditors are meant to
forecast financial profile. On the part of the headmasters concerning whether auditors
are meant to forecast financial profile, 3 strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed, 8 agreed and
2 strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants, 6 strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed,
10 agreed, and 2 strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 5 strongly
disagreed, 4 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 4 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the
teachers, 4 strongly disagreed, 9 disagreed, 19 agreed, and 12 strongly agreed.
46
Thus concerning whether auditors are meant to forecast financial profile, it was found
that there was an expectation gap between auditors on one hand and the non-auditor
group (headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers) on the other hand.
Table 4.1.14 The Audited Financial Statements are Useful in Monitoring an
Organization’s Financial Performance
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
2 1 2 1 1 7
Disagree 1 2 4 3 1 11
Agree 6 6 9 11 6 38
Strongly
Agree
1 8 7 7 36 59
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.14, concerning the auditors with regards to whether audited financial
statements are useful in monitoring an organization‟s financial performance, 2
strongly disagreed that audited financial statements are useful in monitoring an
organization‟s financial performance, 1 disagreed, 6 agreed and 1 strongly agreed.
Thus from the above, majority of the auditors agreed that audited financial statements
are useful in monitoring an organization‟s financial performance. On the part of the
headmasters concerning whether audited financial statements are useful in monitoring
an organization‟s financial performance, 1 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 6 agreed
and 8 strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants, 2 strongly disagreed, 4
disagreed, 9 agreed, and 7 strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 1 strongly
47
disagreed, 3 disagreed, 11 agreed, and 7 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the
teachers, 1 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 6 agreed, and 36 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning whether audited financial statements are useful in monitoring an
organization‟s financial performance, it was found that there was no expectation gap
between auditors on one hand and the non-auditor group ( headmasters, accountants,
teacher and storekeepers) on another hand..
Table 4.1.15 Audit Reports Should Contain More Information About Financial
Forecast
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
1 1 1 1 3 7
Disagree 5 2 4 1 10 22
Agree 3 6 11 10 20 50
Strongly
Agree
1 8 6 10 11 36
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.15 With regards to the auditors on whether audit reports should
contain more information about financial forecast, 1 strongly disagreed that audit
reports should contain more information about financial forecast, 5 disagreed, 3
agreed and 1 strongly agreed. Thus from the above, majority of the auditors disagreed
that audit reports should contain more information about financial forecast. On the
part of the headmasters concerning whether audit reports should contain more
information about financial forecast, 1 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 6 agreed and 8
strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants, 1 strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed, 11
48
agreed, and 6 strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 1 strongly disagreed, 1
disagreed, 10 agreed, and 10 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 3
strongly disagreed, 10 disagreed, 20 agreed, and 11 strongly agreed.
Thus on whether audit reports should contain more information about financial
forecast, it was found that there was an expectation gap between auditors on one hand
and headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on another hand.
Table 4.1.16 The Extent Of Assurance Given By An Auditor Is Clearly Indicated
In Audit Reports
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
0 2 0 1 3 6
Disagree 1 0 5 4 5 15
Agree 6 8 10 9 28 61
Strongly
Agree
3 7 7 8 8 33
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.16, concerning the auditors with regards to whether the extent of
assurance given by an auditor is clearly indicated in audit report, none strongly
disagreed, 1 disagreed, 6 agreed and 3 said strongly agrees. Thus from the above,
majority of the auditors agreed that the extent of assurance given by an auditor is
clearly indicated in audit reports. On the part of the headmasters concerning whether
the extent of assurance given by an auditor is clearly indicated in audit reports, 2
strongly disagreed, none disagreed, 8 agreed and 7 strongly agreed. On the part of the
accountants, none strongly disagreed, 5 disagreed, 10 agreed, and 7 strongly agreed.
49
On the part of the storekeepers, 1 strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 8
strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 3 strongly disagreed, 5 disagreed,
28 agreed, and 8 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning whether the extent of assurance given by an auditor is clearly
indicated in audit reports, it was found that there was no expectation gap between
auditors on one hand and the non-auditor group on another hand.
Table 4.1.17 Auditor Independence Can Influence The Performance Of Audit
Services
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
0 1 1 2 3 7
Disagree 1 2 3 3 6 15
Agree 3 10 6 7 15 41
Strongly
Agree
6 4 12 10 20 52
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.17, concerning the auditors with regards to whether auditor‟s
independence can influence the performance of audit services, none strongly
disagreed that auditor‟s independence can influence the performance of audit services,
1 disagreed, 3 agreed and 6 said they strongly agreed. Thus from the above, majority
of the auditors strongly agreed that auditor‟s independence can influence the
performance of audit services. On the part of the headmasters concerning whether
auditor‟s independence can influence the performance of audit services, 1 strongly
disagreed, 2 disagreed, 10 agreed and 4 strongly agreed. On the part of the
50
accountants, 1 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 6 agreed, and 12 strongly disagreed.
On the part of the storekeepers, 2 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 7 agreed, and 10
strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 3 strongly disagreed, 6 disagreed,
15 agreed, and 20 strongly agreed.
Thus there was no expectation gap between auditors on one hand and headmasters,
accountants, teachers and storekeepers on another hand with regards to auditor
independence influencing the performance of audit services.
Table 4.1.18 When an Auditor Engages In The Provision Of Non-Audit And
Audit Services At The Same Time, Objectivity May Be Impaired
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
0 1 1 1 1 4
Disagree 0 2 1 2 5 10
Agree 4 14 12 12 23 65
Strongly
Agree
6 0 8 7 15 36
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.18, concerning the auditors with regards to when an auditor engages
in the provision of non-audit and audit services at the same time, objectivity may be
impaired, none strongly disagreed, none also disagreed, 4 agreed and 6 said they
strongly agreed. Thus from the above, majority of the auditors strongly agreed that
when an auditor engages in the provision of non-audit and audit services at the same
time, objectivity may be impaired. On the part of the headmasters concerning when an
auditor engages in the provision of non-audit and audit services at the same time,
51
objectivity may be impaired, 1 strongly disagreed, 2 disagreed, 14 agreed and none
strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants, 1 strongly disagreed, 1 disagreed, 12
agreed, and 8 strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 1 strongly disagreed, 2
disagreed, 12 agreed, and 7 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 1
strongly disagreed, 5 disagreed, 23 agreed, and 15 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning auditors engaging in the provision of non-audit and audit services at
the same time, it was found that there was no expectation gap between auditors on one
hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and storekeepers on another hand.
Table 4.1.19 Provision of Audit Services Consistently For A Long Period Of
Time May Lead To Familiarity Threat
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
0 1 1 0 0 2
Disagree 9 3 0 3 0 15
Agree 1 8 10 9 14 42
Strongly
Agree
0 5 11 10 30 56
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.19, concerning the auditors with regards to the provision of audit
services consistently for a long period of time may lead to familiarity threat, none
strongly disagreed, 9 disagreed, 1 agreed and none strongly agreed. Thus from the
above, majority of the auditors disagreed that provision of audit services consistently
for a long period of time may lead to familiarity threat. On the part of the headmasters
concerning the provision of audit services consistently for a long period of time may
52
lead to familiarity threat, 1 strongly disagreed, 3 disagreed, 8 agreed and 5 strongly
agreed. On the part of the accountants, 1 strongly disagreed, none disagreed, 10
agreed, and 11 strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, none strongly
disagreed, 3 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 10 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the
teachers, none strongly disagreed, none also disagreed, 14 agreed, and 30 strongly
agreed.
Thus with regards to the provision of audit services consistently for a long period of
time leading to familiarity threat, it was found that there was an expectation gap
between auditors on one hand and headmasters, accountants, teachers and
storekeepers on another hand.
Table 4.1.20 Auditors Are More Concerned With Pleasing Management
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
8 1 2 3 4 18
Disagree 1 4 8 8 16 37
Agree 1 9 10 9 18 47
Strongly
Agree
0 3 2 2 6 13
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.20, concerning the auditors with regards to whether auditors are more
concerned with pleasing management, 8 strongly disagreed that auditors are more
concerned with pleasing management, 1 disagreed, 1 agreed and none strongly
agreed. Thus from the above, majority of the auditors strongly disagreed that auditors
are more concerned with pleasing management. On the part of the headmasters
53
concerning whether auditors are more concerned with pleasing management, 1
strongly disagreed, 4 disagreed, 9 agreed and 3 strongly agreed. On the part of the
accountants, 2 strongly disagreed, 8 disagreed, 10 agreed, and 2 strongly agreed. On
the part of the storekeepers, 3 strongly disagreed, 8 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 2
strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the teachers, 4 strongly disagreed, 16 disagreed,
18 agreed, and 6 strongly agreed.
Thus with regards to whether auditors are more concerned with pleasing management,
it was found that there was an expectation gap between auditors on one hand and
headmasters, accountants and teachers on another hand.
Table 4.1.21 The Quality Of Audit Has Improved In The Recent Years
Occupation
Response Auditors Headmasters Accountants Storekeepers Teachers Total
Strongly
Disagree
0 1 1 2 2 6
Disagree 1 6 13 8 20 48
Agree 3 6 8 9 16 42
Strongly
Agree
6 4 0 3 6 19
Total 10 17 22 22 44 115
Source: Author‟s Field Survey (2015)
From Table 4.1.21, concerning the auditors with regards to whether quality of audit
has improved in the recent years, none strongly disagreed that quality of audit has
improved in the recent years, 1 disagreed, 3 agreed and 6 strongly agreed. Thus from
the above, majority of the auditors strongly agreed that quality of audit has improved
in the recent years. On the part of the headmasters concerning whether quality of audit
54
has improved in the recent years, 1 strongly disagreed, 6 disagreed, 6 agreed and 4
strongly agreed. On the part of the accountants, 1 strongly disagreed, 13 disagreed, 8
agreed, and none strongly agreed. On the part of the storekeepers, 2 strongly
disagreed, 8 disagreed, 9 agreed, and 3 strongly agreed. Finally on the part of the
teachers, 2 strongly disagreed, 20 disagreed, 16 agreed, and 6 strongly agreed.
Thus concerning the auditors with regards to whether quality of audit has improved in
the recent years, it was found that there was an expectation gap between auditors on
one hand and accountants, but no expectation gap was found between the auditors on
one hand and headmasters and storekeepers on another hand. The responses of
teachers showed some indifference. .
55
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the summary of the findings from the survey, the general
conclusion to the study and the possible recommendations to address the findings
from the study.
5.2 Summary of major findings
This study was conducted to study audit expectation gap in the educational sector of
the Kumasi Metropolis, using a sample of 22 public senior high schools through the
administration of questionnaires to headmasters, accountants, storekeepers, teachers
and external auditors.
Concerning the existence of an audit expectation gap, it was found that there existed
an audit expectation gap between auditors and the public (Headmasters, Accountants,
Storekeepers, Teachers and External Auditors).
Specifically on the responsibility factors contributing to an audit expectation gap, it
was found that concerning the preparation of financial statements, verification of
every accounting transaction, detecting all fraud in an organization, effective system
of internal control, disclosing whether any theft occurred during the financial year and
being responsible for organizational failure as duties of auditors, there was an audit
expectation gap. However on responsibility factors such as expressing an independent
opinion on the financial statements, exercise of judgment in selecting of audit
procedures, additional duty for evaluating whether an organization is a going concern,
responsible for organizational failure, financially liable when they do not exercise
56
diligence in handling the accounts of an organization and responsible for maintaining
public confidence in an organization as duties of auditors, there was no audit
expectation gap.
With regards to reliability factors contributing to audit expectation gap, it was found
that there was an audit expectation gap with regards to auditors being responsible for
forecasting financial profile and audit reports should contain more information about
financial forecast. Whilst there was no audit expectation gap in audited financial
statements being useful in monitoring an organization‟s financial performance and the
extent of assurance given by an auditor being clearly indicated in audit reports.
Last but not the least, an independence factors contributing to an audit expectation
gap, it was found that there existed audit expectation gap with regards to Provision of
audit services consistently for a long period of time leading to familiarity threat,
auditors being more concerned with pleasing management and whether the quality of
audit has improved in the recent years. However, with regards to auditor
independence influencing the performance of audit services and when an auditor
engages in the provision of non-audit and audit services at the same time, objectivity
may be impaired, there was no audit expectation gap.
5.4 Conclusion
Findings from the research show that though auditors are tasked to maintain the
confidence of the public in an organization; there exist expectations from the society
about the audit function, which society see as unreasonable.
Thus specifically it can be concluded that, responsibility factors, reliability factors and
independence factors contributed towards the audit expectation gap in the educational
sector of the Kumasi Metropolis.
57
The different perceptions among the user respondents and auditors could be attributed
to the inadequate sensitization of clients of the auditor‟s roles. The call however for
other duties of users may be a channel to move away from the „traditional audit
objective and move to the risk based auditing‟. The presence of an „expectation gap‟
in auditing means that perhaps, as put forward by other researchers, more standards
should be made to enhance the performance of auditors. Also, some previous
researchers have concluded that it is expedient for the audit profession to respond to
public criticism by improving the quality of work done by auditors. The analysis of
the audit expectation gap in this study will help the accounting profession to bridge
the gap.
5.5 Recommendations
The study recommends that clients or users should be adequately sensitized on the
duties of the auditor and the nature of the services rendered by the auditor. This is to
help address the challenge of the existence of the audit expectation gap that has come
about as a result of users‟ ignorance on the major duties in the auditing profession
such as the preparation of financial statements, verifying account transactions,
ensuring effective internal control mechanisms, detecting and preventing fraudulent
activities, among other responsibilities.
Secondly, there should be means of reducing the duration, specifically the number of
years, an accounting professional, should render services to a client. This is due to the
reason that the autonomy of the professional will be hampered or threatened when he
or she engages in rendering services to the same client over a longer period of time.
58
Thirdly, audit firms should be discouraged from rendering both audit and non-audit
services to the same client. This will increase the independence of the auditor when
carrying out audit assignments.
Lastly, auditor independence must be encouraged among auditors which will go a
long way in boosting public confidence in the auditing profession.
59
REFERENCES
Adams, C.A. and Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, Completeness, Credibility and the
Audit Expectations Gap. JCC, 14, 97-115. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://
web .ebscohost. com/ehost/pdf?vid=8&hid=101&sid=59a19124-c8d2-4dfe-
a554 - fb6c809ec262% 40sessionmgr107
Adeyemi, S.B. and Uadiale, O.M. (2011). An empirical investigation of the audit
expectation gap in Nigeria. African Journal of Business Management Vol.
5(19), pp. 7964-7971, 9 September, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.
Academic journals .org/article/article1 380548204_Adeyemi% 20and% 20
Uadiale. pdf on 2/03/2015
Agyei, A., Aye, K. B. and Owusu-Yeboah, E. (2013) An Assessment of Audit
Expectation Gap In Ghana. International Journal of Academic Research in
Accounting, Finance and Management Science. Vol. 3 (4) pp. 112-118.
AICPA (1978). Commission on auditors‟ responsibilities: Report, conclusions, and
recommendations (The Cohen Commission). New York: American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants.
Ali, A.M., Yusof, N.Z.M., Mohamad, R. and Lee, T. H. (2007). Practical Training and
Audit Expectation Gap: The Case of Accounting Undergraduates of
University Utara Malaysia Retrieved 09/06/2008, from http://www.c
enterforpbbefr .rutgers.edu/ 2007 /Papers/042-Internship%20%20% 20
2007.doc.
Association of Accountancy Bodies in West Africa (ABWA) (2012). Accounting
Technicians Scheme of West Africa (ATSWA). Study Pack for Principles OF
Auditing. Retrieved from http://icanig.org/documents/ATSWA_ Principles_
of_Auditing.pdf
60
Baron, C.D., Johnson, D.A., Searfoss, D.G. and Smith, C.H. (1977), “Uncovering
corporate irregularities: are we closing the expectation gap?”, Journal of
Accountancy, Vol. 144, October, pp. 243-50.
Beck, G.W. (1974). Pubic Accountants in Australia –Their Social Role, Melbourne:
Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
Beelde, D. I., Cooper, S. and Leydens, H. (2005). Expectations of users Of Financial
Information With Regard To The task Carried Out By Auditor.
Benau, M.A.G., Humphrey, C., Moizer, P. and Turley, S. (1993). Auditing
Expectations and Performance in Spain and Britain: A Comparative Analysis.
Int. J. Account., 28: 281-307.
Best, P.J., Buckby, S. and Tan, C. (2001). Evidence of the Audit Expectation Gap in
Singapore. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(3), 134-144. Retrieved 09/06 /
2008, from http://www.eprints.qut.edu.au
Bologna, G. J. and Lindquist, R. J. (1995). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting:
New Tools and Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Boonyanet, C. and Ongthammakul, S. (2006). Expectation gap in Thai accounting
society: changes and comparison of its neighbours. Paper presented at the
Asian Pacific Conference on International Accounting Issues. Hawaii, USA,
pp. 15-18.
Bostick, L.N. and Luehfing, M.S. (2004). Minimizing the Expectation Gap. Academy
of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 8(1), 51-61. Retrieved 11/09/
2008, from http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/Research/allied/ 2004/financial Studies/
pdf/06.pdf
61
Boyd, D.T., Boyd, S. C. and Boyd, W. L. (2001). The Audit Report: A
“Misunderstanding Gap” Between Users and Preparers. National Public
Accountant, 56-60. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://web.ebscohost.com/
ehost/ pdf?vid=9&hid= 101&sid= 59a19124- c8d2-4dfe-a554-
Boyle, D. and Canning, M. (2005). The Impact of Audit Education on Perceptions of
Deficient auditor Performance. The Irish Accounting Review, 12(1), 15-37.
Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://web.ebscohost.com/ ehost/pdf?vid=7 &hid=
101&sid=59a 19124 -c8d2-4dfe-a554-fb6c809ec262%40sessionmgr107
Brandon, D. M. (2003). Three Studies of Auditor Independence. Retrieved
11/09/2008, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08102003-103
059 /unrestricted/ Brandon-ETD.pdf
Bricker, R. and Chandar, N. (1998). On Applying Agency Theory in Historical
Research. Business and Economic History, 27(2), 486-499. Retrieved 10/10/
2008, from http://www.h net.msu.edu/~business/bhcweb/ publications/ BEH
print/ v027n2/ p0486- p0499.pdf
Brown, R. (1962). Changing audit objectives and techniques. The Accounting
Review, 37(4), 696-703.
Church, B.K., Davis, S.M. and McCracken, S.A. (2008). The Auditor‟s Reporting
Model: A Literature Overview and Research Synthesis. Accounting Horizons,
22(1), 69-90. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://web.ebscohost.com /ehost /pdf
?vid= 4&hid=101& sid=59a19124-c8d2-4dfe-a554 fb6c809ec262 %40
session mgr107
Colley, J.L., Doyle, J.L., Logan, G.W. and Stettinius, W. (2003). Corporate
Governance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dana, G. (2011). Audit expectation gap in the public sector in Romania. Annals of the
University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 20(2), 510-516
62
Davidson, L. (1975). The Role and Responsibilities of the auditor: perspective,
expectations and analysis. Unpublished Background Paper for the
Commission on Auditors‟ Responsibilities.
Eden, Y., Ovadia, A. and Zuckerman, B.A. (2003). Rethinking Sarbanes- Oxley: Why
the Act Doesn‟t Serve the Interest of the Industry or the Markets. CMA.
Management, 32-35. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://web.ebscohost .com/
ehost/pd f?vid=8&hid =101& sid= 59a19124-c8d2-4dfe- a554- fb6c809ec 262
% 40sessionmgr107
Edun, L. (1999). Auditing: Beyond Professional Ethics. The Nigerian Accountant,
32(3), 41-44.
Flint, D. (1988). Philosophy and principles of auditing. Hampshire: Macmillan
Education Ltd.
Frank, K.E., Lowe, D.J. and Smith, J.K. (2001). The expectation gap: perceptual
differences between auditors, jurors and students. Managerial Auditing
Journal, 16 (3):45-150.
Gay, G, Schelluch, P. and Reid, I. (1997). Users' Perceptions of the Auditing
Responsibilities for the Prevention, Detection and Reporting of Fraud, Other
Illegal Acts and Error. Aust. Account. Rev., 7(13): 51-61.
Ghana Statistical Service, (2012). 2010 Population and Housing Census of Ghana:
Summary Report of Final Results, Accra, Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
Gloeck, J. D. (1993). The Audit Expectation Gap in the Republic of South Africa.
Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf ?vid=13&hid
= 101 & sid= 59a 19124- c8d2- 4dfe-a554 fb6c809ec262%40sessionmgr107
Gloeck, J. D. (1998). A Public Interest Perspective of the Auditing Standard Setting
Process in South Africa. Southern African Journal of Accountability and
63
Auditing Research, Vol. 1, 9-19. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://www.up
.ac.za/ dspace/bitstream /2263/ 4040/1/Gloeck_Public(1998).pdf
Gul, F., Teoh. H., Andrew, B. and Schelluch, P. (1994). Theory and practice of
Australian auditing (3rd ed.). Nelson, An International Thomson Publishing
Company. Australia.
Haniffa, R. and Hudaib, M. (2007). Locating Audit Expectations Gap within a
Cultural Context: The Case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of International
Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16(2), 179-206. Retrieved 11/09/2008,
from http://www.sobe.ex. ac.uk/ accounting/papers/0203.pdf
Hojskov, L.(1998). The Expectation Gap between Users' and Auditors' Materiality
Judgements in Denmark. Paper presented at the Second Asian Pacific
Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference 4-6 August, Japan.
Hronsky, J.J.F. (1998). Signs, Codes and Communication: The Semiotics of Audit
Reports. Retrieved 10/09/2008, from http://www3.bus.osaka-cu.ac.jp/apira98/
archives/ pdfs/56.pdf
http://www.Feb.ugent.be/fac/research/WP/Paper/WP_99_75. pdf-22No2005.
Hudaib, M. and Haniffa, R. (2003). An Empirical Investigation of Audit Perceptions
Gap in Saudi Arabia. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://www. sobe.
ex.ac.uk/accounting /papers/0203.pdf
Humphrey, C., Moizer, P. and Turley, S. (1993). The Audit Expectations Gap in
Britain: An Empirical Investigation. Accounting and Business Research.
23(91A), 395-411. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://web.ebscohost.com/
ehost/pdf?vid=14& hid=101& sid=59a19124-c8d2-4dfe- a554-fb6c809 ec262
%40 sessionmgr107
Innes, J., Brown, T. and Hatherly, D. (1997), “The Expanded Audit Report- A
Research Study Within the Development of SAS 600; Accounting, Auditing
and Accountability Journal, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp 702-717.
64
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (2005). Agency Theory and
the Role of Audit. Retrieved 02/04/2008, from www.icaew.co.uk/auditquality
International Standard on Auditing 240 (Redrafted). The Auditor‟s Responsibilities
Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. Retrieved 11/09/2008,
from www.paab .co.za/documents/doc_00761.pdf
Kirk, N. (2006). Perceptions of the True and Fair View Concept: An Empirical
Investigation. ABACUS, 42(2), 205-235. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from
http://web.ebscohost. com/ehost/ pdf?vid=6&hid=101&sid=59a19124-c8d2-
4dfe-a554- fb6c809ec262% 40sessionmgr107
Koh, H.C. and Woo, E. (1998). The Expectation Gap in Auditing. Managerial
Auditing Journal, 13(3), 147-154. Retrieved 09/06/2008 from http://www.
Emeraldinsight .com/10.1108/02686909810208038
Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (2013). The Composite Budget of the Kumasi
Metropolitan Assembly for the 2013 Fiscal Year. Available www.mofep.
gov.gh or www.ghana districts.com
Lee, T.H. and Ali, A.M. (2008). The Evolving Role of Auditors: Where Do We Go
From Here? Accountants Today, 20-24. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://
202.46.125.36 /at/at/200803/06.pdf
Lee, T.H., Gloeck, J.D. and Palaniappan, A.K. (2007). The Audit Expectation Gap:
An Empirical Study in Malaysia. South African Journal of Accountability and
Auditing Research, 7, 1-15. Retrieved 09/06/2008, from https://www .up.ac.
za/ dspace/bitstream /2263/4043/1/Lee_Audit(2007).pdf
Liggio, C. (1974). The expectation gap: the accountant‟s Waterloo. J. Contemp. Bus.,
3: 27-44.
Low, A. M. (1980). The auditor‟s detection responsibility: is there an „expectation
gap‟? J. Account., 150(10): 65-70.
65
Maccarrone E (1993). Using the expectation gap to close the legal gap. CPA J. 63: 10-
16.
Mc, Enroe, J.E. and Martens, S.C. (2001). Auditor‟s And Investor‟s Perception of
the Expectation Gap. Account. Horiz., 15(4): 345-358.
Nasreen, T. (2006). Audit expectation gap in Bangladesh: The role of auditing
education in narrowing the gap. DU Journal of marketing, Vol. No. 9.
Porter, B. (1993). An empirical study of the audit expectation-performance gap.
Account. Bus. Res., 24: 49-68.
Saeidi, F. (2012). Audit expectations gap and corporate fraud: Empirical evidence
from Iran. African Journal of Business Management, 6(23), 7031-7041. doi:
10.5897/AJBM12.382
Saha, A. and Baruah, S. D. (2008). Audit Expectations Gap in India: An Empirical
Survey. The Icfai Journal of Audit Practice, V (2), 67-83. Retrieved
11/09/2008, from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=4 &hid=101&
sid=59a19124-c8d2-4dfe- a554- fb6c809ec262%40sessionmgr107
Salehi, M. (2007). An empirical study of corporate audit expectation gap in Iran.
(Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Mysore, India)
Salehi, M. and Azary, Z. (2008). Fraud detection and audit expectation gap: Empirical
evidence from Iranian bankers. International Journal of Business and
Management, 3(10), 65-73.
Schelluch, P. (1996). Long-form audit report messages: Further implications for the
audit expectation gap. Account. Res. J., 9, 48-55.
66
Schelluch, P. and Gay, G. (2006). Assurance Provided by Auditors‟ Reports on
Prospective Financial Information: Implications for the Expectation Gap.
Accounting and Finance, Vol. 46, 653-676. Retrieved 11/09/2008, from
http://web. ebscohost.com/ ehost /pdf? vid=4&hid=101&sid=59a19124- c8d2-
4dfe- a554-fb6c809ec262%4 0 sessionmgr107
Siddiqui, J. and Nasren, T. (2004). Audit Expectations Gap in Bangladesh: Perceptual
Differences between Accounting Professionals and Students. Retrieved
09/06/2008, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=557542
Sikka, P., Puxty, A., Willmott, H. and Cooper, C. (1998). The Impossibility of
Eliminating the Expectations Gap: Some Theory and Evidence. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, 9(3). Retrieved 11/09/2008, from http://www.
sciencedirect. com/science ?_ob=ArticleURL &_udi=B6WD4- 45 K 1649-
Sokchea (2015). Accounting And Auditing. Accessed on 12/2/2015 at http://we-
ana.blogspot. com/2008/10/csa-240-fraud-and-error.html
Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS, 2004). The Auditors' Responsibility to
Consider Fraud and Error in an Audit of financial statements, SAS 110
(October 04). Retrieved from http://www.hkicpa.org.hk/file /media/section6
_standards /standards/sas110.pdf
Teck-Heang, L. and Ali, A. (2008). The evolution of auditing: An analysis of the
historical development. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing,
ISSN1548-6583, USA. Dec. 2008, Vol.4, No.12 (Serial No.43)
Trauth, E.M., Farwell, D.W. and Lee, D. (1993). The IS Expectation Gap: Industry
Expectations versus Academic Preparation. MIS Q., 17(3): 47-72.
Turley, S. and Cooper, M. (2005). Auditing in the United Kingdom. Prentice-Hall
International/ICAEW. Englewood Cliffs.
Woolf, E. (1997). Auditing Today. England: Pearson Education Limited.
67
APPENDIX
QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A- PERSONAL BIODATA
1. Name of Organization……………………………………………….
2. Highest Academic Qualification:
WASSCE HND B Sc. BA MBA M Sc. PhD
3. Professional Qualification
4. Do you have auditing experience?
5. If yes, for how long: Below 1 year 1-10 years above 10 years
6. Occupation: Teaching Staff Management Auditor Accountant
Instruction: The following statements use a four (4) point likert scale. On the scale,
four (4) is the highest construct. The likert scale is given as follows: 4-strongly agree,
3- agree, 2- disagree, and 1- strongly disagree.
SECTION B- RESPONSIBILITY FACTOR SA A D SD
1.Auditors are responsible for the preparation of financial statements. 4 3 2 1
2.The auditor is responsible for expressing an independent opinion on the
financial statements based on their audit.
4 3 2 1
3.The auditor is responsible for verifying every accounting transaction
undertaken by an organization.
4 3 2 1
4.The auditor is responsible for detecting all fraud in an organization. 4 3 2 1
5.The auditor is responsible for an effective internal control in an organization. 4 3 2 1
6.The auditor exercises judgment in selection of audit procedures 4 3 2 1
7.The auditor should take on additional responsibility for evaluating whether an
organization is a going concern.
4 3 2 1
8.The auditor is responsible for disclosing whether any theft occurred during the
financial year.
4 3 2 1
9.Auditors are responsible for organizational failure 4 3 2 1
10. Auditors should be made to pay a fine when they do not exercise diligence
in handling the accounts of an organization
4 3 2 1
11. An auditor is responsible for maintaining public confidence in an
organization.
4 3 2 1
68
SECTION C- RELIABILITY FACTOR SA A D SD
12. Auditors are meant to forecast financial profile 4 3 2 1
13. The audited financial statements are useful in monitoring an
organization‟s performance.
4 3 2 1
14. Audit reports should contain more information about
financial forecast
4 3 2 1
15. The extent of assurance given by an auditor is clearly
indicated in audit reports.
4 3 2 1
SECTION E- INDEPENDENCE FACTOR SA A D SD
16. Auditor independence can influence the performance of audit
services.
4 3 2 1
17. When an auditor engages in provision of non-audit and audit
services at the same time, objectivity may be impaired.
4 3 2 1
18. Provision of audit services consistently for a long period of
time may lead to familiarity threat.
4 3 2 1
19. Auditors are more concerned with pleasing management 4 3 2 1
20. The quality of audit has improved in the recent years 4 3 2 1