Audience Feedback

Concerning Helen Blyth’s Music Video and Digipak

Audience Used for Music Video

• The final version of our music video was show to a group of nineteen 16 – 18 year olds (9 male and 10 female), who had never viewed it before.

• This age group is one that our music video was intended to target, so the feedback should be very useful, although the participants may not be our true target audience, due to their preferences in music genre.

• However the participants are all media studies students which may affect the result due to consumer habits that differ from that of non-media studies students.

Evaluation of Answers

33%

22%

44%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest). The extent to which Males enjoyed our

music video

12345

20%

10%

50%

20%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest).The extent to which Females enjoyed our

music video

12345

As can be seen here our music video was better received by the female audience rather than the male. This is unusual considering more females (3 females and no males) said they found the narrative hard to follow.

Overall these results are quite encouraging, bearing in mind the evaluation was not undertaken by our target audience. The ratings are all 2 or above and the majority of which are rated as an enjoyment of 4 out of 5, this is good news as it means that they enjoyed watching our music video, but there are obviously things that could be improved.

11%

33%

44%

11%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest).How well our music video held the male

participants attention

12345

20%

20%

40%

20%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest).How well our music video held the female

participants attention

12345

There is very little difference in the way the music video kept the attention of both genders of the participants. Females were marginally more captivated than the males with 60% of females and 56% of males voting for 4 and five.

This is good because it means that we have not alienated any audience members with any gender offensive aspects of the music video.

Quite a large proportion of the participants, 33% of males and 20% of females, voted for the middle value 3 which is not so good as it means that our music video is forgettable, however the aspects that the participants said could be improved; like the number of cross fades and the confusing ambiguity in the narrative, others said these were the best aspects of the music video, thus showing the division in the participants that singles out the target audience.

5%

63%

32%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest). How the participants rate the camera work and

editing

12345

The camera work and editing was voted as very good which I am exceedingly pleased with, considering the hard work that went into this part of production. All of the participants appreciated the camera work and editing and 17 out of 19 people said that the camera work and editing were the best parts of the production, one male even saying that “the editing holds the viewers attention” , which is very good feedback to hear.

11%

26%

47%

16%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest).How the participants rate the standard of mise-en-

scene

12345

The overall ratings on the standard of mise-en-scene used in our music video is also positive feedback with 63% of the feedback audience voting for 4 and 5. One female participant who said the mise-en-scene was a standard of 4 said that the music video could be improved by “using more locations”, even though we used about 6 different places in which we filmed. Another comment was that the use of the red coat in the female characters costume as it was very “striking” against the natural, country background. The use of the red coat had more connotations but these do not seem to have been picked up on by the audience.

33%

56%

11%

How the male participants rate the length of our music video

too shortjust righttoo longdon't know

10%

80%

10%

How the female participants rate the length of our music video

too shortjust righttoo longdon't know

These results are a little strange compared to earlier results as 33o was too short, however over half of males (55%) said that they didn’t really enjoy the music video voting only 2 and 3. So it would be thought that as they did not enjoy it they would not think it was too short.

On the other hand, the majority of the participants voted that the length of the music video was just right.When we made that music video it did not fill the entirety of the song but we faded out the music at the right time with the visuals to make it look like it was the correct length. By the looks of these results it seems to have worked effectively.

33%

33%

33%

How many of the males in the test group would watch the music video

again

yesnodon't know

70%

10%

20%

How many of the females in the test group would watch the music video

again

yesnodon't know

These results are very different depending on the sex of the audience. The majority of female participants (over 2/3) said they would watch our music video again but only 1/3 of males said they would. This could reflect the way in which our music video is more appealing to the females in our target audience.

It is still positive feedback that 10 out of 19 participants would watch the video again and only 4 would not (with 5 undecided). This means that our music video was well accepted and still has interest enough to watch it more than once.

100%

How many of the participants believe the video reflects the style of music

yesnodon't know

37%

32%

32%

How many of the participants believe the music video successfully pro-

motes the band

yesnodon't know

The top graph shows how many of the evaluation participants thought that the video reflects the style of music. As can be seen this is extremely good news as everyone believed that it did reflect the style of music.

This second graph shows less straight forward results as only 37% of participants believe that the music video successfully promotes the band. This could be due to the fact that our music video has no live footage of the band and only has two characters. although combined with my digipak it can be seen that Tamas is the lead singer, the results of this question could be improved by adding live footage of the band to the music video.

11%

22%

56%

11%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest).The overall ratings of our music video by

males

12345

20%

60%

20%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest).The overall ratings of our music video by

females

12345

These results again are quite encouraging as 80% of females and 67% males rated our music video as a level 4 or 5, which is very good.

The results from the females is especially good as no one voted below a level 3 which is exceedingly good.

So overall our music video was very well received by the participating audience.

What can improve the appeal?• Suggestions for what could improve the appeal of the music video were quite interesting:• One person suggested “less cross fades” and another suggested “less roundabout scenes”

could improve the appeal, but the use of both of these aspects were used to create a montage of flashbacks, using cross fades which are generic in love song music videos.

• Three people suggested adjustments to the narrative to improve the appeal of the music video:

1. The first said we needed to “add more depth to the story”, but to add more depth means to explain why the couple are in the position they are in and we purposely did not do this to create a sense of ambiguity.

2. The second of which suggested creating a “clearer narrative” which also would erase the ambiguous element of the music video and would mean a whole new music video.

3. The third suggestion was to make the “narrative faster” which would be interesting to achieve but the narrative is not linear so we decided the speed at which we delivered the narrative was fast enough with the added interest of the flashbacks.

Conclusion

• Overall the audience feedback has been quite pleasing, although some suggestions don’t seem to have been fully thought through.

• However some suggestions have been taken into account and if I ever undertake a task like this again I shall keep them in mind. For example:

1. The suggestions about the pace of the shots.2. The over ambiguity of our narrative, that appears to

confuse some audiences.3. The representation of the band and whether it fully

promotes them.

Audience used for Digipak Feedback

• My final print productions were shown to a group of 5 anonymous lower sixth students aged 16 – 18, (3 male and 2 female).

• Again this fits into the target audience but does not account for the participants fitting directly into our target audience as they may not enjoy the rock indie genre.

• The evaluation has not been undertaken by many people so the results may not be representative of the wider audience.

Evaluation of Answers

On this question concerning the music video we did very well with 100% of people thinking the video reflected the genre of music, however my digipak has not achieved so highly, however it is not all bad as no one has voted below 3 and 40% of people voted 4. Which is a very good result considering the participants of the evaluation have only heard one of the songs from the album I created.

40%

40%

20%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest)How successfully the digipak reflects the genre of music

12345

40%

40%

20%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest)How effectively the magazine advert successfully reflect

the genre of music

12345

These are the same results as the slide before and they show that the test group thought the magazine advert did the same as the digipak and reflects quite well the genre of music it was designed for. 60% thought that the generic reflection was very good, so I am happy with these results, although they could be marginally better, the test group was very small and had not heard all of the songs.

The results of this question are not so pleasing, as 60% of participants thought the overall graphics were of low levels 2 and 3 out of 5. This is not a very good result, but may have something to do with the comment a participant made that “the print on the bottom of the advert is hard to read”. The print is concerning copyright issues and is of little importance but in hindsight should have been a little bigger as although I found it perfectly easy to read others may not.

It is unusual though that 4 out of 5 of the test group commented that the colours and photography used was the best aspect of the print productions, so it is quite strange that most did not like the graphics.

On the plus side 40% of the test group voted that the graphics were of a level 4 standard which is very good.

20%

40%

40%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest)Overall rating of the graphics in the entire print

package

12345

20%

40%

40%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest)Overall rating of the graphics and print in the album

12345

Again the results for the album are the same as for the advert package, perhaps due to the fact that I used the same sort of design adjusted for the use of both the print productions.

These results are not quite what I hoped and I am a little disappointed because I specifically created a bold simple design so the graphics would look good and I believed I had achieved this.

40%

20%

20%

20%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest)How successfully the Britishness of the band is estab-

lished

12345

These results are not great but it was what I expected as I created y design for the print productions without thinking about showing the Britishness of the band, however the reviews added to the advert and the album cover show the Britishness of the band. Apart from adding another picture of a British emblem like the union jack or a cathedral, there is very little I can do to change this result.

Some of the test group have noticed the British references in the reviews as 40% have voted a level of 4 and 5. But I know that the Britishness of the band has not been communicated to a thorough level.

60%20%

20%

Would the magazine advert encourage the par-ticipants to buy the digipak

yesno undecided

This is an encouraging result considering the test group is not my definitive target audience and 3 out of 5 people saying that the advertisement is effective, is very good feedback, because if it worked on 3 out of 5 of the public who see it the result would be good record sales.

20%

60%

20%

On a scale of 1 (lowest) - 5 (highest)Overall rating of the print productions

12345

I am extremely pleased with this result because no one voted below a level 3, and 4 out of the 5 participants voted for a level 4 and 5 which is a very good result, meaning that the print productions together are effective.

Some comments made about the best aspects of the productions say that there is “good use of colour and photography and font” 4 people thought that the use of colour was the best part of the production and the other participant said the font “with the backwards N’s” was their favourite part. So the design of the print productions seems to have been very well received.

Comments

Some comments were made about the best aspects of the productions:

• “good use of colour and photography and font” 4 people thought that the use of colour was the best part of the production.

• The other participant said the font “with the backwards N’s” was their favourite part.

• So overall the design of the print productions seems to have been very well received.

Conclusion

• I am very happy with the results received from the feedback.

• However if I was to change my print productions I would make sure the print concerning the copyright is legible to everyone and not just me.

• I would not however change my design at all even to add Britishness because that would ruin its simplicity and charm.