Auburn University Image Survey 2001 University Image Survey 2001 ... Auburn University Image Survey...

326
Auburn University Image Survey 2001 Full Version Survey Research Laboratory November 2001

Transcript of Auburn University Image Survey 2001 University Image Survey 2001 ... Auburn University Image Survey...

Auburn University Image Survey 2001 Full Version

Survey Research Laboratory November 2001

Auburn University Image Survey November 2001 Center for Governmental Services

Table of Contents (Full Version)

Executive Summary I. Project Overview 1 II. Methodology 2 III. Findings 5

A. Summary 5 B. Importance of Auburn University to the State 5 C. Educational Contribution of Auburn University 7 D. Public Sources of Information Alabama Universities 10 E. Awareness and Support for AU Research Activities 11 F. Awareness and Support for AU Outreach Activities 11 G. Issues Important to Alabamians 13

IV. Appendices

APPENDIX A: Auburn University Image Survey Questionnaire APPENDIX B: Frequency Distributions of Survey Results APPENDIX C: Verbatim Responses of Open-Ended Questions APPENDIX D: Survey Responses Controlled by Education Level APPENDIX E: Survey Responses Controlled by Income Level APPENDIX F: Survey Responses Controlled by Gender APPENDIX G: Survey Responses Controlled by Alumni Status APPENDIX H: Survey Responses Controlled by Race

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 1 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

I. Project Overview

In July 2001, the Auburn University Office of the Vice President for Outreach and the Office of University Relations contracted with the Center for Governmental Services to conduct an opinion survey of Alabama citizens. The primary purpose was to appraise and measure the awareness, opinions, and attitudes held by Alabama residents regarding Auburn University. The specific objectives were to assess:

The familiarity of the Alabama public with Auburn University; The perceived importance of Auburn University’s activities to the

welfare of the State; The awareness and to evaluate the educational quality, research

benefits, and outreach activities conducted at Auburn University The viewership and awareness of service announcements

sponsored by Auburn University.

From July 12 through July 17, the Center for Governmental Services contacted 1,814 randomly selected Alabama residents by telephone and completed 529 interviews. The profile of respondents reasonably matched the State demographic profile with respect to education level, income, and race. There was somewhat higher response rate from the elderly and women.

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 2 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

II. Methodology

A. Questionnaire Development

The Center for Governmental Services (CGS) met with senior leadership from the Auburn University Office of University Relations and the Office of the Vice President for Outreach to determine modifications to be made to the survey conducted by CGS in 1999. Each of the offices reviewed the format and approved the survey instrument protocol prior to distribution. Appendix A contains the codebook used in this survey. Prior to the survey, CGS staff reviewed and tested the survey instrument, corrections were made to clarify vague or misleading questions, and the survey was pre-tested.

B. Sample Selection and Survey Procedures

The proper selection of a survey sample is vital to ensure that the survey

results can be generalized to the total population from which the sample is selected. The goal is to produce results from the sample that would be the same as if the entire population was interviewed, within a reasonable margin of error. Consequently, using a random number generator, CGS selected a random sample of approximately 3,600 telephone numbers in Alabama. During July 12 – 17 2001, CGS placed calls to all numbers in the sample. This resulted in 529 completed interviews with adult Alabama residents. Of the 1,814 telephone numbers completed, 900 Alabamians responded, with 549 (61%) agreeing to participate in the survey.

C. Interviewing and Data Analysis Procedures

Prior to the initiation of data collection, all interviewers were trained on

proper interviewing techniques; including, building rapport with respondents, avoiding biases, administering questions properly, and probing for complete answers. Each interviewer was required to complete the training session successfully before participating in this study. During the interviewing sessions, all of the interviewers were supervised, monitored, and evaluated to maintain interviewing standards.

The Center used a Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI)

system to assure data accuracy and to facilitate the transference of data to the SPSS statistical analysis program. The data are reliable within a 96% confidence interval, indicating that the results of this survey are accurate within plus or minus 4%. This confidence level is standard for survey research and provides a balance between accuracy and efficiency.

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 3 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

D. Sample Demographic Profile

The sample profile is a reasonable approximation of the population of the State. With respect to age, approximately 37% of those interviewed are under 40 years of age. The very elderly, however, are slightly more represented in the sample than in the general population. About 9% of the sample is over 71 years of age, reflecting the fact that the elderly tend to be more place-bound than those who are younger, and tend to be more willing to participate in a telephone survey (See Table 1).

Table 1: Age Profile of the AU Image Survey Sample

96 18.1 19.2 19.290 17.0 18.0 37.3

126 23.8 25.3 62.586 16.3 17.2 79.854 10.2 10.8 90.647 8.9 9.4 100.0

499 94.3 100.07 1.3

23 4.330 5.7

529 100.0

Under 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071+Total

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

The income, education, and race profiles of the sample are all reasonably close to the social demographic profile in Alabama. Forty-eight percent of the sample earns less than $40,000 per year (See Table 2). Approximately 40% of the sample have a high school education or less (See Table 3), and about 77% of the reporting sample respondents are Caucasian, and 21% African-American (See Table 4).

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 4 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

Table 2: Income Profile of the AU Image Survey Sample

84 15.9 19.0 19.0129 24.4 29.3 48.3155 29.3 35.1 83.446 8.7 10.4 93.927 5.1 6.1 100.0

441 83.4 100.065 12.323 4.388 16.6

529 100.0

Less than $20,000$20 - 39,000$40 - 74,000$75 - 99,000$100,000 and overTotal

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Table 3: AU Image Survey Sample by Education

47 8.9 9.4 9.4

151 28.5 30.1 39.4

158 29.9 31.5 70.988 16.6 17.5 88.458 11.0 11.6 100.0

502 94.9 100.04 .8

23 4.327 5.1

529 100.0

Less that High SchoolHigh Schooldiploma/GEDSome collegeBachelor's degreeGraduate/ProfessionalTotal

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Table 4: AU Image Survey Sample by Race

104 19.7 20.8 20.82 .4 .4 21.27 1.3 1.4 22.6

384 72.6 76.8 99.43 .6 .6 100.0

500 94.5 100.06 1.1

23 4.329 5.5

529 100.0

African-AmericanAsian-AmericanNative-AmericanWhiteOtherTotal

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 5 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

III. Findings

A. Summary

Overall, the public values highly, the contributions made by Auburn University. An overwhelming majority of Alabama residents believe that Auburn University has an important effect on the quality of life in the State as well as in their individual communities. Alabamians are aware of and appreciate the role that Auburn University plays in attracting and supporting jobs in their community. Many Alabama residents agree that Auburn University and its quality of higher education have a direct and positive impact on their families. Many Alabamians also believe that Auburn University is among the best universities in the South and in the Nation. Over 90% agree that the State of Alabama receives a good return on its investment in Auburn University.

Many of the respondents are familiar with Auburn Outreach and the Alabama

Cooperative Extension System. Although less than half of respondents report having used the Cooperative Extension’s or Outreach’s services in recent months, nearly all of the respondents agree that these programs are beneficial to their families. Education, community and economic development, family and youth, environment, and agriculture are the service areas covered by Auburn University Outreach and Extension, which were considered to be the most important to the quality of life in Alabama. Almost three fourths of respondents are aware of Auburn’s continuing education programs. Ninety-nine percent agreed that Auburn University’s partnerships with local schools are important and should be continued. Most Alabama residents believe that Auburn University needs to expand continuing education and local school partnerships while offering more classes and degree programs via distance learning.

Nearly all Alabama residents strongly support and approve of the research conducted at Auburn University and believe that it is significant and should be continued. Relatively few are aware of the specific research activities, and less than half of the respondents have seen the Auburn University television announcements on these initiatives. However, nearly all of the respondents who have seen the commercials believe that the information is valuable and should continue to be presented to the public.

B. Importance of Auburn University

A large majority of Alabama residents agree that Auburn University plays an important role in Alabama as well as in their community. Almost 93% of respondents recognize that Auburn University positively and significantly affects the quality of life in the State (Table 5), and over three fourths assert that Auburn University is important to the quality of life in their local community (Table 6).

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 6 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

Table 5: Importance of Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Alabama

9 1.7 1.7 1.727 5.1 5.2 6.92 .4 .4 7.3

207 39.1 40.0 47.3273 51.6 52.7 100.0518 97.9 100.0

11 2.1529 100.0

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery importantTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Table 6: Importance of Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Your Local Community

17 3.2 3.4 3.492 17.4 18.3 21.77 1.3 1.4 23.1

218 41.2 43.3 66.4169 31.9 33.6 100.0503 95.1 100.0

26 4.9529 100.0

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery importantTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Auburn University is also acknowledged to provide strong positive economic and labor force contributions to the State. Nearly 94% of respondents believe that Auburn University is important in creating jobs within the State (Table 7).

Table 7: Does Auburn University Help Create Jobs in the Alabama

10 1.9 2.0 2.021 4.0 4.1 6.11 .2 .2 6.3

240 45.4 47.0 53.2239 45.2 46.8 100.0511 96.6 100.018 3.4

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 7 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

Auburn University’s contributions to the economy are also recognized on the local level. Eighty-four percent of Alabamians polled believe that Auburn University’s research efforts are important in attracting and keeping jobs in the local community (Table 8).

Table 8: How Important is Auburn University’s Research for Jobs in Your Local

Community?

9 1.7 1.9 1.960 11.3 12.7 14.66 1.1 1.3 15.9

191 36.1 40.6 56.5205 38.8 43.5 100.0471 89.0 100.058 11.0

529 100.0

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery importantTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

C. Auburn University’s Educational Contribution

The majority of respondents (59%) have some degree of familiarity with Auburn University. This level of familiarity with Auburn University is higher for respondents with a higher education (79%), income over $40,000 (75%), white respondents (64%), male respondents (68%), and respondents who are alumnus or have family that are alumnus (92%). The educational contribution of Auburn University is also significant and recognized by most Alabamians. Eighty-eight percent of the respondents agree that Auburn graduates perform important roles in their community with 45% strongly agreeing with this sentiment (Table 9).

Table 9: Auburn Graduates Play an Important Role in Your Local Community

17 3.2 3.4 3.436 6.8 7.2 10.68 1.5 1.6 12.2

217 41.0 43.2 55.4224 42.3 44.6 100.0502 94.9 100.027 5.1

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 8 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

When exploring the role of Auburn graduates, race has a statistically significant impact on the level of agreement. Nearly 92% of white respondents agree that AU graduates possess important community roles, but less than 78% of African-American respondents share this perception (Table 10).

Table 10: Auburn University Graduates Play an Important Role in Your Local Community Controlled by Race Category

% within Race by Category

5.9% 1.9% 2.8%15.7% 4.4% 6.9%1.0% 1.9% 1.7%

43.1% 43.5% 43.4%34.3% 48.2% 45.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn graduatesplay importantroles in localcommunity

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Among Alabamians, the perception regarding the quality of Auburn University is overwhelmingly positive. More than 8 out of 10 respondents (85%) believe Auburn is one of the best universities in the South (Table 11), while 73% of respondents believe Auburn to be one of the best universities in the Nation. Higher rates of approval are given by white respondents (95% South; 76% Nation) and respondents with connections to Auburn alumni (95% South; 84% Nation).

Table 11: Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the South

18 3.4 3.5 3.544 8.3 8.7 12.216 3.0 3.1 15.4

225 42.5 44.3 59.6205 38.8 40.4 100.0508 96.0 100.021 4.0

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Relatively few respondents (20%) perceive that Auburn University is under-funded compared to other universities in the Southeast (Table 12), and almost an equal percentage (19%) perceive that Auburn University receives more support than other Southeastern universities. Twenty-six percent of respondents with a Bachelor’s degree education agree that Auburn University’s

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 9 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

funding compares poorly to other universities in the South, and even among those closely connected to Auburn University alumni, only 27% perceive that the University is poorly funded in comparison to other universities in the South.

Table 12: How Does Auburn University Funding Compare to Other Universities in the Southeast?

74 14.0 20.0 20.0227 42.9 61.4 81.4

69 13.0 18.6 100.0370 69.9 100.0159 30.1529 100.0

LessAbout the sameMoreTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Despite the lack of groundswell support for additional funding for the University, nearly all Alabamians (94%) believe that funds currently spent on Auburn University are a good investment for Alabama. Significantly, almost 90% of Alabamians believe that the quality of higher education personally affects them, and 60% of respondents strongly believe that they are impacted by the quality of higher education within Alabama (Table 13).

Table 13: The Quality of Higher Education in Alabama Affects Me

21 4.0 4.1 4.128 5.3 5.4 9.58 1.5 1.6 11.1

154 29.1 29.9 41.0304 57.5 59.0 100.0515 97.4 100.011 2.13 .6

14 2.6529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

One of the more controversial aspects of funding and support for higher education at Auburn University concerns the priority placed on athletics in comparison to educational programs. Alabamians are evenly split on whether Auburn focuses more on athletics than on education. Less than 6% of respondents do not have an opinion regarding the balance between athletics and academics. Forty-seven percent of Alabamians perceive that Auburn University

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 10 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

concentrates on athletics to the detriment of academic programs, while 47% disagree (Table 14).

Table 14: Auburn University Concentrates on Athletics Rather Than Academic Programs

83 15.7 16.8 16.8151 28.5 30.5 47.327 5.1 5.5 52.7

136 25.7 27.5 80.298 18.5 19.8 100.0

495 93.6 100.034 6.4

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Higher income respondents (i.e. over $40,000 annually) and those with Bachelor degrees or higher are more likely to disagree with the statement, “AU concentrates on athletics rather than academic programs” (56% and 61% disagreement respectively). Among those with a family connection to Auburn University alumni, the level of disagreement is 52%. Among all demographic categories, however, there are significant proportions that believe that the University’s priorities are more heavily place on athletics than on its educational programs.

D. Public’s Sources of Information About Universities in

Alabama

Alabamians receive information about universities in Alabama from a variety of sources; including newspapers, radio, television, students, alumni, co-workers and the Internet. Newspapers and television, however, are the primary sources of information regarding universities in Alabama. Sixty-four percent of respondents identify newspapers as their primary source for information about Alabama universities, while 57% are informed by television and 36% by current students. Less than a third of the respondents identify any other media or contacts as a source of information regarding universities in Alabama (See Appendix B, Questions 14-22).

Despite television being one of the three primary sources of information, less

than half of respondents (48.2%) report seeing any of Auburn University’s television service announcements about AU’s research activities. Regarding specific television spots, 11% remember viewing the AU spot on bulletproof vest research, 9% recall viewing the spot on airbag research, and 26% saw one of the television announcements on Auburn University’s economic impact.

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 11 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

Despite a relatively low audience, those respondents that report viewing the

commercials overwhelmingly approve of the commercials and believe they should continue to be produced and shown. Over 90% of those who remember seeing one or more of the television spots on Auburn University during the past year agree that the messages on Auburn University’s impact are valuable and should continue to be broadcast (See Appendix B, Questions 23, 26, 30, and 33).

E. Awareness and Support for Auburn University’s Research Activities

Public awareness about Auburn University’s public oriented research

initiatives varies by the research activity. Over 60% of Alabamians are aware of the University’s involvement in fisheries research. Thirty-six percent and thirty-two percent, respectively, are aware of the engagement of Auburn University with highway construction and West Alabama low-income housing construction. Twenty-six percent are aware that the University is involved in conducting research on improving the bulletproof vest, and 21% know that the University is helping to improve the airbag systems in motor vehicles.

Nearly all Alabamians strongly support Auburn University’s research

activities, particularly those with immediate applied applications. Every Auburn University research initiative receives over ninety percent approval ratings by the respondents. For example, over 98% of Alabamians believe that the University’s research on fisheries is significant. Ninety-seven percent of respondents consider the University’s research on highway construction and on West Alabama low income housing to be significant; and 96% agree that research on airbags and bulletproof vests are significant activities (See Appendix B, Questions 24 – 40).

F. Awareness and Support for Auburn University’s Outreach Activities

Auburn University Outreach and the Cooperative Extension System are

important sources of assistance for many Alabamians. Eight-three percent of respondents, for example, agree that it is significant for their community to have access to outreach programs (Table 15).

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 12 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

Table 15: How Significant is the Availability of Outreach Programs to Your Local Community

22 4.2 4.3 4.325 4.7 4.9 9.231 5.9 6.1 15.310 1.9 2.0 17.2

172 32.5 33.7 50.9251 47.4 49.1 100.0511 96.6 100.018 3.4

529 100.0

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significantTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Usage of outreach and extension service services by Alabamians varies by the type of service offered. For example, 53% of the respondents are aware of the Cooperative Extension System, 24% use the Extension System services, and nearly all those who use the services (98%) believe that the programs are beneficial (See Appendix B, Questions 46 - 48). Familiarity with the System varies by population group. For example, 46% of those with less than a high school education are familiar with Extension services, compared to over 71% of those with a bachelor’s degree or more.

Public awareness regarding the University’s involvement with Continuing Education is very high, but participation in the continuing education program is more limited and varies by population group. Over 70% of Alabamians are aware that Auburn University is involved in providing continuing education, but only 14% of those aware of the offerings have availed themselves of these services (See Appendix B, Questions 41 - 42).

The usage rate of AU continuing education services also varies among the different population control groups. Nineteen percent of respondents that are aware of AU continuing education programs with household incomes in excess of $40,000 have availed themselves of these programs. This compares to 11% with lower household incomes. Twenty-six percent of those with an alumnus connection to AU and who are also aware of AU’s continuing education have attended a class offered by Auburn University. This figure compares to 11% with no alumnus connection to the University. Finally, the participation rate in continuing education programs at Auburn University nearly doubles between those with less than a bachelor’s degree education (12%) to those with a graduate or professional degree (21%) (Table 16).

AU Image Survey 2001 Page 13 Center for Governmental Services, Auburn University

Table 16: Participation in a Continuing Education Program at Auburn University Controlled by Education Category

% within Education by Category

88.3% 11.7% 100.0%

79.5% 20.5% 100.0%

85.4% 14.6% 100.0%

Less thanBachelor's DegreeBachelor's degreeor Higher

Educationby Category

Total

No Yes

Have taken anycontinuing education

programsTotal

Two of Outreach’s current major endeavors, namely, the University’s partnerships with local schools and distance learning classes, are heavily supported by Alabamians. Respondents are virtually unanimous (99.4%) in their support of the AU School Partnership program, and 86% believe that their local school district would benefit from such a partnership (See Appendix B, Questions 43 - 45). With respect to distance learning, nearly 88% of respondents state a preference that Auburn University should offer more programs through this medium (See Appendix B, Question 49).

G. Issues Important to Alabamians The survey queried Alabamians about issues that they perceive to be

important. Issue areas included: Education, Community and Economic Development, Agriculture, Family and Youth, and the Environment. In each case, more than eight out of ten Alabamians report that the issue is important. Ninety-seven percent state that education is an important issue; 95% view community and economic development as important; and 94% report that family and youth are important issues. Finally, the environment is important for 92% of respondents, while agriculture garners 90% support (See Appendix B, Questions 50 – 55).

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 1

Appendix A: 2001 Auburn University Image Survey Questionnaire

1. How familiar are you with Auburn University? Would you say that you are

very familiar, familiar, not very familiar, or not at all familiar? Very familiar Familiar Neutral Not very familiar Not at all familiar Don’t know

2. How important is Auburn University to the overall quality of life in

Alabama? Very important Important Neutral Not very important Unimportant Don’t know

3. How important is Auburn University to the overall quality of life in your

local community? Very important Important Neutral Not very important Unimportant Don’t know

4. How important is the research conducted at Auburn University to attracting

and keeping jobs in your local community? Very important Important Neutral Not very important Unimportant Don’t know

5. During the past year, have you or your family directly benefited from

Auburn University? Yes No

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 2

6. Do you think Auburn University receives more, less, or about the same dollar amount of State support as compared to other universities in the Southeast?

More About the same Less Don’t know

7. Auburn University helps to create jobs in Alabama.

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neutral Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

8. Auburn graduates play an important role in my community.

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neutral Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

9. Auburn University concentrates on developing strong athletic programs

rather than quality educational programs. Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neutral Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

10. Auburn is one of the best public universities in the South.

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neutral Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 3

11. Auburn is one of the best public universities in the nation. Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neutral Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

12. The State of Alabama receives a good return for its investment in Auburn

University. Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neutral Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

13. The quality of higher education in Alabama affects my family and me.

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neutral Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know

14. – 22. Where do you get information regarding State universities and

colleges? (check all that apply) Newspapers Radio Magazines T.V. Internet/ websites Alumni Students Co-workers Other No response

23. During the past year, did you see any TV or other media about Auburn

University research? Yes No

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 4

24. Are you aware of Auburn University’s research contributions to the development of a lighter, less bulky bulletproof vest for police officers?

Yes No

25. If yes, do you think this research is significant and should be continued?

Yes No

26. If yes, have you seen the TV announcement about this research?

Yes No

27. If yes, do you think Auburn University should continue to provide this

announcement? Yes No

28. Are you aware Auburn University’s research contributed to the next

generation of automobile airbags? Yes No

29. If yes, do you think this research is significant and should be continued?

Yes No

30. If yes, have you seen the TV announcement about this research?

Yes No

31. If yes, do you think Auburn University should continue to provide this

announcement? Yes No

32. Are you aware of the positive impact Auburn University has on Alabama’s

economy? Yes No

33. If yes, have you seen TV announcement about these positive impacts?

Yes No

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 5

34. If yes, do you think Auburn University should continue to provide this announcement?

Yes No

35. Are you aware Auburn University’s research contributed to highway safety

by developing new road surface materials and construction techniques? Yes No

36. If yes, do you think this research is significant and should be continued?

Yes No

37. Are you aware that Auburn University’s research in fisheries and

aquacultures sustains one of the world’s leading food sources? Yes No

38. If yes, do you think this research is significant and should be continued?

Yes No

39. Are you aware that Auburn University architecture students design low

cost housing in West Alabama? Yes No

40. If yes, should Auburn continue to invest in this kind of program?

Yes No

41. Are you aware of Auburn’s continuing education programs available for

professionals such as teachers, architects, engineers, pharmacist, veterinarians, and others?

Yes No

42. If yes, have you taken any continuing education programs offered by

Auburn University? Yes No

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 6

43. Did you know that Auburn University partners with local school districts by

providing professional training and development services to teachers? Yes No

44. If yes, should Auburn continue to invest in these partnerships?

Yes No

45. Would your local school district benefit from a university partnership?

Yes No

46. Are you familiar with the Alabama Cooperative Extension System?

Yes No

47. If yes, have you used any services available through your local county

agent of the Extension system? Yes No

48. If yes, are these programs beneficial to you and your family?

Yes No

49. Distance learning allows students to take college classes at any time or

any location off campus by using computers, videotapes, and other methods. Should Auburn offer more of its classes and degree programs through distance learning?

Yes No

50.- 55. Auburn University’s outreach services help people and communities

address significant local and statewide issues. Please respond “yes” to the issues that are important to you. Education Community and Economic Development Agriculture Family and Youth Environment Any other issue that is important to you ________ No response

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 7

56. How significant is it to you to have Auburn University outreach programs in your community?

Very significant Significant Neutral Insignificant Very insignificant No opinion

57. How significant is it to you to have access to Auburn University information

through the Internet? Very significant Significant Neutral Insignificant Very insignificant No opinion

58. Have you, your spouse, or your children ever attended Auburn University?

Yes No

59. Are you currently employed…..?

Full-time Part-time Retired Unemployed Other No answer

60. How many people live in your house?

61. How many children under 18 years of age currently live in your

household?

62. – 63. In which age group would you include yourself? Under 30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71+ No answer

64. What is your highest educational level?

Less than High School

Appendix A: 2001 AU Image Survey Questionnaire Page A - 8

High School diploma/GED Some college Bachelor’s degree Graduate/Professional No answer

65. – 66. Which category best describes your annual household income?

Less than $20,000 $20- 39,000 $40- 74,000 $75- 99,000 $100,000 and over No answer

67. – 68. What race do you identify with?

African-American Asian-American Hispanic Native-American White Other No answer

69. What is your gender?

Male Female No answer

Appendix B: 2001 Auburn University Image SurveyFrequency Distributions of Responses

1. How Familiar Are You With Auburn University?

69 13.0 13.1 13.1142 26.8 26.9 40.0

5 .9 .9 40.9185 35.0 35.0 75.9127 24.0 24.1 100.0528 99.8 100.0

1 .2529 100.0

Not at all familiarNot very familiarNeutralFamiliarVery familiarTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

2. How Important is Auburn to the Quality of Life in Alabama

9 1.7 1.7 1.727 5.1 5.2 6.92 .4 .4 7.3

207 39.1 40.0 47.3273 51.6 52.7 100.0518 97.9 100.011 2.1

529 100.0

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery importantTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

3. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Your Local Community?

17 3.2 3.4 3.492 17.4 18.3 21.77 1.3 1.4 23.1

218 41.2 43.3 66.4169 31.9 33.6 100.0503 95.1 100.026 4.9

529 100.0

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery importantTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 1

4. How Important is Auburn University Rresearch to Jobs in Your Local Community?

9 1.7 1.9 1.960 11.3 12.7 14.66 1.1 1.3 15.9

191 36.1 40.6 56.5205 38.8 43.5 100.0471 89.0 100.058 11.0

529 100.0

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery importantTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

5. Have You or Your Family Benefited From Auburn University?

373 70.5 70.5 70.5156 29.5 29.5 100.0529 100.0 100.0

NoYesTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

6. How does Auburn University Funding Compare to Other Universities in the Southeas?

74 14.0 20.0 20.0227 42.9 61.4 81.469 13.0 18.6 100.0

370 69.9 100.0159 30.1529 100.0

LessAbout the sameMoreTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

7. Auburn University Helps to Create Jobs in Alabama

10 1.9 2.0 2.021 4.0 4.1 6.11 .2 .2 6.3

240 45.4 47.0 53.2239 45.2 46.8 100.0511 96.6 100.018 3.4

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 2

8. Auburn University Graduates Play an Important Role in Your Local Community

17 3.2 3.4 3.436 6.8 7.2 10.68 1.5 1.6 12.2

217 41.0 43.2 55.4224 42.3 44.6 100.0502 94.9 100.027 5.1

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

9. Auburn University Concentrates on Athletics Rather Than Academic Programs

83 15.7 16.8 16.8151 28.5 30.5 47.327 5.1 5.5 52.7

136 25.7 27.5 80.298 18.5 19.8 100.0

495 93.6 100.034 6.4

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

10. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the South

18 3.4 3.5 3.544 8.3 8.7 12.216 3.0 3.1 15.4

225 42.5 44.3 59.6205 38.8 40.4 100.0508 96.0 100.021 4.0

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 3

11. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the Nation

42 7.9 8.6 8.673 13.8 14.9 23.519 3.6 3.9 27.4

216 40.8 44.2 71.6139 26.3 28.4 100.0489 92.4 100.040 7.6

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

12. Alabama Receives a Good Return on its Investment From Auburn University

4 .8 .8 .818 3.4 3.8 4.79 1.7 1.9 6.6

208 39.3 44.2 50.7232 43.9 49.3 100.0471 89.0 100.058 11.0

529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

13. The Quality of Higher Education in Alabama Affects Me.

21 4.0 4.1 4.128 5.3 5.4 9.58 1.5 1.6 11.1

154 29.1 29.9 41.0304 57.5 59.0 100.0515 97.4 100.011 2.13 .6

14 2.6529 100.0

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal

Valid

Don't knowSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 4

14. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Newspapers.

186 35.2 35.6 35.6336 63.5 64.4 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

15. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Radio.

371 70.1 71.1 71.1151 28.5 28.9 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

16. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Magazines.

361 68.2 69.2 69.2161 30.4 30.8 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

17. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Television.

223 42.2 42.7 42.7299 56.5 57.3 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 5

18. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Internet.

345 65.2 66.1 66.1177 33.5 33.9 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

19. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Alumni.

355 67.1 68.0 68.0167 31.6 32.0 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

20. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Students.

333 62.9 63.8 63.8189 35.7 36.2 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

21. I Learn About Alabama Universities From My Co-workers.

368 69.6 70.5 70.5154 29.1 29.5 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 6

22. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Other Sources.

439 83.0 84.1 84.183 15.7 15.9 100.0

522 98.7 100.07 1.3

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

23. I Saw a Television Announcement About Auburn University's Research.

267 50.5 51.1 51.1255 48.2 48.9 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

24. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed a New Bulletproof Vest.

389 73.5 74.5 74.5133 25.1 25.5 100.0522 98.7 100.0

7 1.3529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

25. The Bulletproof Vest Research is Significant.

6 1.1 4.5 4.5127 24.0 95.5 100.0133 25.1 100.0396 74.9529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 7

26. I Saw a Television Announcement About the Bulletproof Vest.

73 13.8 54.9 54.960 11.3 45.1 100.0

133 25.1 100.0396 74.9529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

27. The Bulletproof Vest Announcement Should be Continued.

4 .8 6.7 6.756 10.6 93.3 100.060 11.3 100.0

469 88.7529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

28. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed New Airbags.

410 77.5 78.7 78.7111 21.0 21.3 100.0521 98.5 100.0

8 1.5529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

29. The Airbag Research is Significant.

4 .8 3.6 3.6107 20.2 96.4 100.0111 21.0 100.0418 79.0529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 8

30. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's Airbags.

63 11.9 56.8 56.848 9.1 43.2 100.0

111 21.0 100.0418 79.0529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

31. The Airbag Announcement Should Be Continued.

4 .8 8.3 8.344 8.3 91.7 100.048 9.1 100.0

481 90.9529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

32. I Am Aware That Auburn University Impacts the Economy.

188 35.5 36.2 36.2331 62.6 63.8 100.0519 98.1 100.010 1.9

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

33. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's Impact on the Economy.

191 36.1 57.9 57.9139 26.3 42.1 100.0330 62.4 100.0199 37.6529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 9

34. The Impact Announcements Should Be Continued.

3 .6 2.2 2.2136 25.7 97.8 100.0139 26.3 100.0390 73.7529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

35. I Am Aware That Auburn University Improves Highway Construction.

330 62.4 63.8 63.8187 35.3 36.2 100.0517 97.7 100.012 2.3

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

36. The Highway Construction Research is Significant.

5 .9 2.7 2.7182 34.4 97.3 100.0187 35.3 100.0342 64.7529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

37. I Am Aware That Auburn University Fisheries Sustains One of the World's Leading Food Sources.

205 38.8 39.9 39.9309 58.4 60.1 100.0514 97.2 100.015 2.8

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 10

38. The Fisheries Research is Significant.

5 .9 1.6 1.6304 57.5 98.4 100.0309 58.4 100.0220 41.6529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

39. I Am Aware That Auburn University Architecture Students Build Housing in West Alabama.

349 66.0 67.9 67.9165 31.2 32.1 100.0514 97.2 100.015 2.8

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

40. The Housing Program Should Be Continued.

5 .9 3.0 3.0160 30.2 97.0 100.0165 31.2 100.0364 68.8529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

41. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Continuing Education Programs.

152 28.7 29.6 29.6362 68.4 70.4 100.0514 97.2 100.015 2.8

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 11

42. I Have Participated in a Continuing Education Program at Auburn University.

310 58.6 85.6 85.652 9.8 14.4 100.0

362 68.4 100.0167 31.6529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

43 I Am Aware of Auburn University's Partnerships With Local Schools.

343 64.8 66.7 66.7171 32.3 33.3 100.0514 97.2 100.015 2.8

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

44. The Partnerships Should Be Continued.

1 .2 .6 .6170 32.1 99.4 100.0171 32.3 100.0358 67.7529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

45. My Local School District Would Benefit From a Partnership.

72 13.6 14.0 14.0442 83.6 86.0 100.0514 97.2 100.015 2.8

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 12

46. I Am Familiar With the Cooperative Extension System.

243 45.9 47.3 47.3271 51.2 52.7 100.0514 97.2 100.015 2.8

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

47. I Have Used Services From the Extension System.

143 27.0 52.8 52.8128 24.2 47.2 100.0271 51.2 100.0258 48.8529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

48. The Cooperative Extension Programs Are Beneficial.

2 .4 1.6 1.6126 23.8 98.4 100.0128 24.2 100.0401 75.8529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

49. Auburn University Should Offer More Distance Learning Programs.

62 11.7 12.1 12.1452 85.4 87.9 100.0514 97.2 100.015 2.8

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 13

50. Is Education an Important Issue for You?

14 2.6 2.7 2.7498 94.1 97.3 100.0512 96.8 100.017 3.2

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

51. Is Community and Economic Development an Important Issue for You?

27 5.1 5.3 5.3485 91.7 94.7 100.0512 96.8 100.017 3.2

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

52. Is Agriculture an Important Issue for You?

53 10.0 10.4 10.4459 86.8 89.6 100.0512 96.8 100.017 3.2

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

53. Are Family and Youth Important Issues for You?

32 6.0 6.3 6.3480 90.7 93.8 100.0512 96.8 100.017 3.2

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 14

54. Is the Environment an Important Issue for You?

39 7.4 7.6 7.6473 89.4 92.4 100.0512 96.8 100.017 3.2

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

55. Are There Any Other Important Issues for You?

445 84.1 86.9 86.967 12.7 13.1 100.0

512 96.8 100.017 3.2

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

56. How Significant is it to Have Outreach Programs in Your Community?

22 4.2 4.3 4.325 4.7 4.9 9.231 5.9 6.1 15.310 1.9 2.0 17.2

172 32.5 33.7 50.9251 47.4 49.1 100.0511 96.6 100.018 3.4

529 100.0

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significantTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 15

57. How Significant is it to Have Access to Information Over the Internet?

33 6.2 6.5 6.554 10.2 10.6 17.078 14.7 15.3 32.38 1.5 1.6 33.9

111 21.0 21.7 55.6227 42.9 44.4 100.0511 96.6 100.018 3.4

529 100.0

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significantTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

58. Have You, Your Spouse, or Your Children Attended Auburn University?

405 76.6 80.0 80.0101 19.1 20.0 100.0506 95.7 100.023 4.3

529 100.0

NoYesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

59. Are You Currently Employed?

67 12.7 13.4 13.492 17.4 18.4 31.834 6.4 6.8 38.6

285 53.9 57.0 95.622 4.2 4.4 100.0

500 94.5 100.06 1.1

23 4.329 5.5

529 100.0

UnemployedRetiredPart-timeFull-timeOtherTotal

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 16

60. Number of People in Your Household?

27 5.1 5.1 5.11 .2 .2 5.3

84 15.9 15.9 21.2172 32.5 32.5 53.9108 20.4 20.4 74.385 16.1 16.1 90.433 6.2 6.2 96.615 2.8 2.8 99.43 .6 .6 100.0

529 100.0 100.0

01234567Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

61. What is the Number of Children (Under 18) in Your Household?

33 6.2 6.2 6.2302 57.1 57.1 63.384 15.9 15.9 79.270 13.2 13.2 92.428 5.3 5.3 97.710 1.9 1.9 99.61 .2 .2 99.81 .2 .2 100.0

529 100.0 100.0

0123458Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

62. Age of the Respondent.

96 18.1 19.2 19.290 17.0 18.0 37.3

126 23.8 25.3 62.586 16.3 17.2 79.854 10.2 10.8 90.647 8.9 9.4 100.0

499 94.3 100.07 1.3

23 4.330 5.7

529 100.0

Under 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071+Total

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 17

63. Age by Category

186 35.2 37.3 37.3313 59.2 62.7 100.0499 94.3 100.0

7 1.323 4.330 5.7

529 100.0

Under 4041 and OverTotal

Valid

No AnswerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

64. Highest Level of Education of the Respondent.

47 8.9 9.4 9.4

151 28.5 30.1 39.4

158 29.9 31.5 70.988 16.6 17.5 88.458 11.0 11.6 100.0

502 94.9 100.04 .8

23 4.327 5.1

529 100.0

Less that High SchoolHigh SchoolDiploma/GEDSome CollegeBachelor's DegreeGraduate/ProfessionalTotal

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

65. What is Your Approximate Annual Household Income?

84 15.9 19.0 19.0129 24.4 29.3 48.3155 29.3 35.1 83.446 8.7 10.4 93.927 5.1 6.1 100.0

441 83.4 100.065 12.323 4.388 16.6

529 100.0

Less than $20,000$20 - 39,000$40 - 74,000$75 - 99,000$100,000 and overTotal

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 18

66. Income by Category

213 40.3 48.3 48.3228 43.1 51.7 100.0441 83.4 100.065 12.323 4.388 16.6

529 100.0

Under $40,000Over $40,000Total

Valid

No AnswerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

67. Race

104 19.7 20.8 20.82 .4 .4 21.27 1.3 1.4 22.6

384 72.6 76.8 99.43 .6 .6 100.0

500 94.5 100.06 1.1

23 4.329 5.5

529 100.0

African-AmericanAsian-AmericanNative-AmericanWhiteOtherTotal

Valid

No answerSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

68. Race by Category

104 19.7 21.3 21.3384 72.6 78.7 100.0488 92.2 100.018 3.423 4.341 7.8

529 100.0

Africian-AmericanWhiteTotal

Valid

All othersSystemTotal

Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 19

69. Gender

313 59.2 61.9 61.9193 36.5 38.1 100.0506 95.7 100.023 4.3

529 100.0

FemaleMaleTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Appendix B: 2001 AU Image Survey Frequency ResponsesPage B - 20

Appendix C: 2001 AU Image Survey Verbatim Responses Page C - 1

Appendix C: 2001 AU Image Survey Verbatim Responses

Open-Ended / Responses Q22: Where do you get information regarding State universities and colleges? Friends and Family

o Family members (17) o Friends (7) o Other people (5)

Ads, Brochures, Flyers, and Mailers o Ads, flyers, and mailers (5) o College materials (3) o Public information/news (2)

Schools and Teachers o Universities (11) o High Schools (8) o Schoolteachers (2)

Word of Mouth and Experience o Word of mouth (10) o Personal experience (3)

Other o Affiliation with the school (3) o Sport affiliations (2) o Community meetings (2) o Visiting campus (2) o Agriculture (1)

Q55: Auburn University's Outreach services help people and communities

address significant local and statewide issues. What issues are important to you?

Wildlife and Nature Issues

o Wildlife (7) o Pest control (1) o Water conservation (2)

Youth Issues

Appendix C: 2001 AU Image Survey Verbatim Responses Page C - 2

o Child care and development (3)

Healthcare Issues

o Health care (5) o Medical research (1) o Sexually transmitted diseases (1)

Religious and Moral Issues o Religion (6) o Morality (3)

Political Issues o Politics (3)

Racial Issues

o Promoting racial issues (1) o Insufficient minorities among faculty (1)

Athletic Issues o Sports/football (3)

Other Issues o Specialized programs (3) o Board of trustees (2) o Road building and engineering (2) o Anything that refers to community (1) o Architecture (1) o Employment (1) o Handicaps (1) o Justice system (1) o Living standards (1) o Other locations (1) o Public Relations (1)

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey ResponsesControlled by Education Level Category

1. How Familiar Are You With Auburn University? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

16.3% 3.4% 12.6%30.1% 15.1% 25.7%

1.1% .7% 1.0%32.7% 43.2% 35.7%19.7% 37.7% 25.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Not at all familiarNot very familiarNeutralFamiliarVery familiar

How familiarare you withAuburn

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

39.590a 4 .00043.150 4 .000

39.421 1 .000

501

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.46.a.

Symmetric Measures

.281 .038 6.535 .000c

.277 .040 6.443 .000c

501

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 1

2. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Alabama?(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

.9% 2.1% 1.2%4.9% 4.1% 4.7%.3% .7% .4%

39.4% 41.8% 40.1%54.5% 51.4% 53.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How importantis Auburn tothe quality oflife in Alabama

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.048a 4 .7271.915 4 .751

.448 1 .503

491

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .59.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.030 .046 -.669 .504c

-.030 .045 -.658 .511c

491

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 2

3. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Your LocalCommunity? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

2.4% 4.2% 2.9%18.6% 16.8% 18.0%

1.5% 1.4% 1.5%41.6% 46.2% 43.0%35.9% 31.5% 34.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn to thequality of life inlocal community

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.344a 4 .6732.281 4 .684

.289 1 .591

477

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.10.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.025 .046 -.537 .592c

-.032 .045 -.705 .481c

477

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 3

4. How Important is Auburn University Research for Jobs in Your LocalCommunity? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

1.9% 2.2% 2.0%8.9% 18.7% 11.9%1.9% 1.3%

39.9% 41.0% 40.3%47.3% 38.1% 44.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn researchfor jobs in localcommunity

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

11.902a 4 .01813.089 4 .011

6.552 1 .010

447

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.80.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.121 .049 -2.576 .010c

-.109 .048 -2.302 .022c

447

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 4

5. Have You or Your Family Benefited from Auburn University?(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

73.3% 58.9% 69.1%26.7% 41.1% 30.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Have you or your familybenefited from AuburnTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.074b 1 .0029.410 1 .0029.803 1 .002

.002 .001

10.054 1 .002

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 45.08.b.

Symmetric Measures

.142 .046 3.200 .001c

.142 .046 3.200 .001c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 5

6. How Does Auburn University Funding Compare to Other Universitiesin the Southeast? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

17.7% 26.9% 20.5%63.4% 54.6% 60.7%18.9% 18.5% 18.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

LessAbout the sameMore

How does Auburnfunding compare toother universities inthe Southeast

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.005a 2 .1353.880 2 .144

1.737 1 .187

351

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.31.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.070 .055 -1.319 .188c

-.071 .055 -1.332 .184c

351

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 6

7. Auburn University Helps to Create Jobs in Alabama.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

1.5% 1.4% 1.4%4.1% 4.2% 4.1%.3% .2%

48.7% 40.3% 46.2%45.5% 54.2% 48.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn helpscreate jobs inAlabama

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.570a 4 .4673.857 4 .426

1.262 1 .261

487

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .30.a.

Symmetric Measures

.051 .046 1.124 .262c

.074 .045 1.633 .103c

487

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 7

8. Auburn University Graduates Play an Important Role in Your LocalCommunity. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

2.4% 5.0% 3.1%7.4% 6.4% 7.1%2.1% 1.5%

41.1% 46.4% 42.7%47.0% 42.1% 45.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn graduatesplay importantroles in localcommunity

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.391a 4 .1728.165 4 .086

.767 1 .381

478

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.05.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.040 .047 -.875 .382c

-.040 .046 -.863 .389c

478

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 8

9. Auburn University Concentrates on Athletics Instead of AcademicPrograms (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

15.0% 20.4% 16.6%26.7% 40.1% 30.6%

5.7% 5.1% 5.5%28.8% 24.1% 27.4%23.7% 10.2% 19.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn concentrateson athletic instead ofacademic programs

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

17.229a 4 .00218.114 4 .001

14.934 1 .000

470

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.58.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.178 .044 -3.923 .000c

-.177 .043 -3.889 .000c

470

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 9

10. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the South.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

4.1% 2.1% 3.5%7.4% 9.2% 7.9%4.1% .7% 3.1%

42.9% 45.8% 43.8%41.5% 42.3% 41.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is one ofthe bestuniversities inthe South

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.503a 4 .2396.727 4 .151

.409 1 .522

482

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.42.a.

Symmetric Measures

.029 .044 .639 .523c

.022 .045 .493 .622c

482

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 10

11. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the Nation.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

8.0% 7.9% 8.0%12.9% 15.0% 13.5%

4.3% 2.1% 3.7%44.6% 46.4% 45.2%30.2% 28.6% 29.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is oneof the bestuniversities inthe nation

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.722a 4 .7871.851 4 .763

.063 1 .802

465

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.12.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.012 .046 -.251 .802c

-.012 .046 -.251 .802c

465

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 11

12. Alabama Receives a Good Return on Its Investment from AuburnUniversity.

(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

.3% .7% .4%3.6% 3.6% 3.6%2.3% 1.6%

44.7% 40.7% 43.4%49.2% 55.0% 51.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

State receives agood return on itsinvestment fromAuburn

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.485a 4 .3446.515 4 .164

.842 1 .359

449

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

5 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .62.a.

Symmetric Measures

.043 .048 .917 .359c

.057 .047 1.205 .229c

449

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 12

13. The Quality of Higher Education in Alabama Affects Me.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

3.2% 4.9% 3.7%5.7% 4.2% 5.3%1.7% 1.2%

32.5% 23.8% 29.9%56.9% 67.1% 59.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Quality of highereducation inAlabama affectsme

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.091a 4 .0889.813 4 .044

.969 1 .325

491

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.75.a.

Symmetric Measures

.044 .046 .984 .326c

.086 .044 1.907 .057c

491

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 13

14. I Learn About Alabama Universities from Newspapers.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

36.5% 31.5% 35.1%

63.5% 68.5% 64.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromnewspapersTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.141b 1 .285.932 1 .334

1.153 1 .283.304 .167

1.139 1 .286

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 51.19.b.

Symmetric Measures

.048 .044 1.067 .286c

.048 .044 1.067 .286c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 14

15. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Radio.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

72.5% 67.1% 70.9%27.5% 32.9% 29.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from radioTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.436b 1 .2311.188 1 .2761.417 1 .234

.236 .138

1.433 1 .231

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 42.46.b.

Symmetric Measures

.053 .045 1.198 .232c

.053 .045 1.198 .232c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 15

16. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Magazines.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

71.1% 61.6% 68.3%

28.9% 38.4% 31.7%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities frommagazinesTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.249b 1 .0393.824 1 .0514.170 1 .041

.045 .026

4.240 1 .039

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 46.24.b.

Symmetric Measures

.092 .046 2.066 .039c

.092 .046 2.066 .039c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 16

17. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Television.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

43.5% 41.8% 43.0%56.5% 58.2% 57.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from T.V.Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.131b 1 .718

.069 1 .793

.131 1 .718.766 .397

.130 1 .718

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 62.82.b.

Symmetric Measures

.016 .045 .361 .718c

.016 .045 .361 .718c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 17

18. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Internet. (by EducationCategory)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

69.4% 56.2% 65.5%

30.6% 43.8% 34.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromthe InternetTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.009b 1 .0057.434 1 .0067.856 1 .005

.005 .003

7.993 1 .005

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 50.31.b.

Symmetric Measures

.126 .046 2.847 .005c

.126 .046 2.847 .005c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 18

19. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Alumni. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

73.9% 51.4% 67.3%26.1% 48.6% 32.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from alumniTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

23.843b 1 .00022.831 1 .00023.116 1 .000

.000 .000

23.796 1 .000

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 47.70.b.

Symmetric Measures

.218 .046 4.993 .000c

.218 .046 4.993 .000c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 19

20. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Students.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

66.0% 58.2% 63.7%34.0% 41.8% 36.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from studentsTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.720b 1 .0992.393 1 .1222.691 1 .101

.103 .061

2.715 1 .099

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 52.93.b.

Symmetric Measures

.074 .045 1.650 .099c

.074 .045 1.650 .099c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 20

21. I Learn About Alabama Universities From My Co-workers.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

73.9% 62.3% 70.5%

26.1% 37.7% 29.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromco-workersTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.641b 1 .0106.097 1 .0146.473 1 .011

.013 .007

6.628 1 .010

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 43.04.b.

Symmetric Measures

.115 .046 2.589 .010c

.115 .046 2.589 .010c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 21

22. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Other Sources.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

83.7% 85.6% 84.3%16.3% 14.4% 15.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from otherTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.284b 1 .594

.159 1 .690

.289 1 .591.686 .349

.284 1 .594

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.98.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.024 .044 -.532 .595c

-.024 .044 -.532 .595c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 22

23. I Saw a Television Announcement About Auburn University Research.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

56.7% 37.7% 51.2%

43.3% 62.3% 48.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Seen any T.V.announcements aboutAuburn researchTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

15.070b 1 .00014.317 1 .00015.174 1 .000

.000 .000

15.040 1 .000

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 71.25.b.

Symmetric Measures

.173 .044 3.934 .000c

.173 .044 3.934 .000c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 23

24. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed A New Bulletproof Vest.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

77.5% 67.8% 74.7%22.5% 32.2% 25.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn developednew bulletproof vestTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.176b 1 .0234.674 1 .0315.026 1 .025

.031 .016

5.166 1 .023

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 36.94.b.

Symmetric Measures

.102 .046 2.282 .023c

.102 .046 2.282 .023c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 24

25. The Bulletproof Vest Research is Significant. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

2.5% 4.3% 3.1%97.5% 95.7% 96.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the bulletproof vestresearch significantTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.299b 1 .584

.000 1 .983

.289 1 .591.626 .473

.297 1 .586

127

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.48.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.049 .092 -.543 .588c

-.049 .092 -.543 .588c

127

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 25

26. I Saw a Television Announcement About the Bulletproof Vest.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

53.8% 57.4% 55.1%46.3% 42.6% 44.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout bulletproof vestTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.164b 1 .686

.048 1 .826

.164 1 .686.715 .414

.162 1 .687

127

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.09.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.036 .088 -.401 .689c

-.036 .088 -.401 .689c

127

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 26

27. The Bulletproof Vest Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

5.4% 10.0% 7.0%

94.6% 90.0% 93.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should bulletproofvest announcementbe continuedTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.420b 1 .517

.011 1 .917

.402 1 .526.607 .439

.413 1 .521

57

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.086 .139 -.639 .525c

-.086 .139 -.639 .525c

57

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 27

28. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed New Airbags.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

78.4% 77.4% 78.1%21.6% 22.6% 21.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburndeveloped new airbagsTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.057b 1 .811

.015 1 .904

.057 1 .811.813 .448

.057 1 .811

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 31.99.b.

Symmetric Measures

.011 .045 .239 .811c

.011 .045 .239 .811c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 28

29. The Airbag Research is Significant. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

3.9% 3.0% 3.6%96.1% 97.0% 96.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the airbag researchsignificantTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.049b 1 .824

.000 1 1.000

.051 1 .8211.000 .653

.049 1 .825

110

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.20.b.

Symmetric Measures

.021 .090 .220 .826c

.021 .090 .220 .826c

110

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 29

30. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's AirbagResearch.

(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

59.7% 51.5% 57.3%40.3% 48.5% 42.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout airbagsTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.639b 1 .424

.347 1 .556

.636 1 .425.529 .277

.633 1 .426

110

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.10.b.

Symmetric Measures

.076 .096 .794 .429c

.076 .096 .794 .429c

110

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 30

31. The Airbag Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

6.5% 12.5% 8.5%

93.5% 87.5% 91.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should airbagannouncementbe continuedTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.496b 1 .481

.023 1 .879

.472 1 .492.597 .420

.485 1 .486

47

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.36.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.103 .155 -.693 .492c

-.103 .155 -.693 .492c

47

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 31

32. I Am Aware That Auburn University Impacts the Economy.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

39.0% 26.7% 35.5%61.0% 73.3% 64.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn impactsthe economyTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.881b 1 .0096.353 1 .0127.076 1 .008

.010 .005

6.867 1 .009

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 51.77.b.

Symmetric Measures

.117 .043 2.636 .009c

.117 .043 2.636 .009c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 32

33. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's Impacts.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

61.8% 48.6% 57.4%38.2% 51.4% 42.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout the impactsTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.070b 1 .0244.547 1 .0335.046 1 .025

.031 .017

5.055 1 .025

324

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 45.57.b.

Symmetric Measures

.125 .056 2.263 .024c

.125 .056 2.263 .024c

324

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 33

34. The Impact Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

1.2% 3.6% 2.2%

98.8% 96.4% 97.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should impactannouncementbe continuedTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.920b 1 .338

.132 1 .717

.897 1 .343.563 .349

.913 1 .339

138

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.20.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.082 .085 -.955 .341c

-.082 .085 -.955 .341c

138

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 34

35. I Am Aware That Auburn University Improves Highway Construction.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

64.3% 60.3% 63.1%35.7% 39.7% 36.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn improvedhighway constructionTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.730b 1 .393

.567 1 .452

.726 1 .394.416 .225

.729 1 .393

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 53.80.b.

Symmetric Measures

.038 .045 .854 .394c

.038 .045 .854 .394c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 35

36. The Highway Construction Research is Significant.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

3.1% 2.2%

96.9% 100.0% 97.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is the highwayconstructionresearch significantTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.867b 1 .172.675 1 .411

3.050 1 .081.311 .219

1.857 1 .173

185

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.25.b.

Symmetric Measures

.100 .026 1.366 .174c

.100 .026 1.366 .174c

185

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 36

37. I Am Aware That Auburn University Fisheries Sustains One of the World's Leading Food Sources. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

42.7% 32.2% 39.6%57.3% 67.8% 60.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn fisheriessustains food sourcesTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.775b 1 .0294.346 1 .0374.854 1 .028

.035 .018

4.766 1 .029

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 57.88.b.

Symmetric Measures

.098 .043 2.191 .029c

.098 .043 2.191 .029c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 37

38. The Fisheries Research is Significant. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

2.0% 1.0% 1.7%98.0% 99.0% 98.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the fisheries researchsignificantTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.371b 1 .542

.017 1 .898

.404 1 .5251.000 .473

.370 1 .543

303

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.63.b.

Symmetric Measures

.035 .050 .608 .544c

.035 .050 .608 .544c

303

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 38

39. I Am Aware That Auburn University Architecture Students BuildLow-Income Housing in West Alabama. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

69.7% 62.3% 67.5%

30.3% 37.7% 32.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware architecturestudents build housingin West AlabamaTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.540b 1 .1112.216 1 .1372.504 1 .114

.116 .069

2.535 1 .111

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 47.41.b.

Symmetric Measures

.071 .045 1.595 .111c

.071 .045 1.595 .111c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 39

40. The Low-Income Housing Program in West Alabama Should Be Continued. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

9.1% 3.1%100.0% 90.9% 96.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should housing programbe continuedTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.129b 1 .0017.302 1 .007

11.178 1 .001.004 .004

10.067 1 .002

163

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.69.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.249 .055 -3.266 .001c

-.249 .055 -3.266 .001c

163

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 40

41. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Continuing Education Programs.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

32.6% 19.9% 28.9%

67.4% 80.1% 71.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburncontinuingeducation programsTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.157b 1 .0047.549 1 .0068.546 1 .003

.005 .003

8.141 1 .004

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 42.17.b.

Symmetric Measures

.127 .041 2.874 .004c

.127 .041 2.874 .004c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 41

42. I Have Participated in a Continuing Education Program Offered byAuburn University. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

88.3% 79.5% 85.4%

11.7% 20.5% 14.6%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Have taken anycontinuingeducation programsTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.946b 1 .0264.261 1 .0394.735 1 .030

.037 .021

4.932 1 .026

357

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.04.b.

Symmetric Measures

.118 .056 2.233 .026c

.118 .056 2.233 .026c

357

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 42

43. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Partnerships With Local Schools.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

71.9% 53.4% 66.5%

28.1% 46.6% 33.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburnpartnerships withlocal schoolsTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

15.890b 1 .00015.070 1 .00015.481 1 .000

.000 .000

15.858 1 .000

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 48.86.b.

Symmetric Measures

.178 .046 4.043 .000c

.178 .046 4.043 .000c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 43

44. The School Partnerships Should Be Continued. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

1.5% .6%100.0% 98.5% 99.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should partnershipsbe continuedTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.479b 1 .224.038 1 .846

1.818 1 .178.405 .405

1.471 1 .225

168

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .40.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.094 .047 -1.214 .226c

-.094 .047 -1.214 .226c

168

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 44

45. My Local School District Would Benefit From a Partnership.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

15.2% 8.2% 13.1%

84.8% 91.8% 86.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Would local schooldistrict benefit frompartnershipTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.379b 1 .0363.791 1 .0524.739 1 .029

.041 .023

4.370 1 .037

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.20.b.

Symmetric Measures

.093 .039 2.098 .036c

.093 .039 2.098 .036c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 45

46. I Am Familiar With Auburn University's Cooperative Extension System.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

53.7% 28.8% 46.4%46.3% 71.2% 53.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Familiar with CooperativeExtension SystemTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

25.779b 1 .00024.788 1 .00026.500 1 .000

.000 .000

25.727 1 .000

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 67.76.b.

Symmetric Measures

.227 .042 5.202 .000c

.227 .042 5.202 .000c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 46

47. I Have Used Services Provided by the Auburn University ExtensionSystem. (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

57.0% 46.2% 52.8%43.0% 53.8% 47.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Used any services fromExtension SystemTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.994b 1 .0842.576 1 .1082.996 1 .083

.103 .054

2.983 1 .084

269

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 49.10.b.

Symmetric Measures

.106 .061 1.734 .084c

.106 .061 1.734 .084c

269

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 47

48. The Cooperative Extension Programs Are Beneficial.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

2.8% 1.6%97.2% 100.0% 98.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Are Extension programsbeneficialTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.603b 1 .206.301 1 .584

2.351 1 .125.503 .311

1.590 1 .207

127

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .88.b.

Symmetric Measures

.112 .040 1.264 .209c

.112 .040 1.264 .209c

127

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 48

49. Auburn University Should Offer More Distance Learning Programs.(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

11.5% 11.6% 11.6%88.5% 88.4% 88.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should Auburn offermore distance learningTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.002b 1 .968

.000 1 1.000

.002 1 .9681.000 .539

.002 1 .968

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.87.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.002 .045 -.040 .968c

-.002 .045 -.040 .968c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 49

50. Is Education an Important Issue? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

2.8% 2.7% 2.8%97.2% 97.3% 97.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is education animportant issueTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.002b 1 .966

.000 1 1.000

.002 1 .9661.000 .615

.002 1 .966

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.07.b.

Symmetric Measures

.002 .044 .043 .966c

.002 .044 .043 .966c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 50

51. Is Community and Economic Development an Important Issue?(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

4.8% 6.2% 5.2%

95.2% 93.8% 94.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is community andeconomic developmentan important issueTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.407b 1 .524

.173 1 .677

.394 1 .530.512 .331

.406 1 .524

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.56.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.028 .047 -.637 .525c

-.028 .047 -.637 .525c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 51

52. Is Agriculture an Important Issue? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

9.6% 11.6% 10.2%90.4% 88.4% 89.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is agriculture animportant issueTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.497b 1 .481

.294 1 .588

.486 1 .486.516 .290

.496 1 .481

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.83.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.031 .046 -.704 .482c

-.031 .046 -.704 .482c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 52

53. Are Family and Youth Important Issues? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

5.9% 6.8% 6.2%94.1% 93.2% 93.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is family and youth andimportant issueTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.161b 1 .688

.039 1 .843

.158 1 .691.686 .412

.161 1 .688

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.02.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.018 .046 -.401 .689c

-.018 .046 -.401 .689c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 53

54. Is the Environment an Important Issue? (by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

7.3% 8.2% 7.6%92.7% 91.8% 92.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the environmentan important issueTotal

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.124b 1 .725

.028 1 .868

.122 1 .727.713 .426

.124 1 .725

502

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.05.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.016 .046 -.352 .725c

-.016 .046 -.352 .725c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 54

55. How Significant is It to Have Outreach Programs in Your Community?(by Education Category)

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

5.1% 2.1% 4.2%4.8% 4.8% 4.8%6.2% 4.8% 5.8%2.2% 1.4% 2.0%

30.9% 39.0% 33.3%50.8% 47.9% 50.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How significantis it to haveoutreachprograms incommunity

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.211a 5 .3915.520 5 .356

.902 1 .342

502

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (8.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.91.a.

Symmetric Measures

.042 .041 .950 .343c

.003 .043 .069 .945c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 55

56. How Significant is it to Have Access to Information Over the Internet?(by Education Category)

* E

Crosstab

% within Education by Category

7.9% 2.1% 6.2%10.7% 9.6% 10.4%16.0% 11.6% 14.7%

1.4% 2.1% 1.6%20.8% 24.7% 21.9%43.3% 50.0% 45.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How Significantis it to accessinformation overthe Internet

Total

Less thanBachelor's

Degree

Bachelor'sdegree or

Higher

Education by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

9.141a 5 .10410.440 5 .064

6.291 1 .012

502

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (8.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.33.a.

Symmetric Measures

.112 .041 2.522 .012c

.096 .043 2.161 .031c

502

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix D: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Education CategoryPage D - 56

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey ResponsesControlled by Income Level Category

1. How Familiar Are You With Auburn University? (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

17.0% 7.5% 12.0%34.9% 16.7% 25.5%

1.9% .4% 1.1%29.2% 42.1% 35.9%17.0% 33.3% 25.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Not at all familiarNot very familiarNeutralFamiliarVery familiar

How familiarare you withAuburn

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

41.258a 4 .00042.070 4 .000

38.102 1 .000

440

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.41.a.

Symmetric Measures

.295 .045 6.452 .000c

.287 .045 6.275 .000c

440

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 1

2. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Alabama?(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

1.5% .9% 1.2%4.9% 5.3% 5.1%.5% .4% .5%

43.9% 37.6% 40.6%49.3% 55.8% 52.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How importantis Auburn tothe quality oflife in Alabama

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.260a 4 .6882.262 4 .688

.849 1 .357

431

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .95.a.

Symmetric Measures

.044 .048 .922 .357c

.060 .048 1.249 .212c

431

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 2

3. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Your LocalCommunity (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

3.5% 2.2% 2.8%22.6% 15.2% 18.7%

3.5% 1.7%38.2% 45.3% 41.9%32.2% 37.2% 34.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn to thequality of life inlocal community

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

13.531a 4 .00916.215 4 .003

5.708 1 .017

422

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.30.a.

Symmetric Measures

.116 .048 2.403 .017c

.104 .049 2.134 .033c

422

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 3

4. How Important is Auburn University Research for Jobs in Your LocalCommunity? (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

2.6% 1.0% 1.8%10.1% 13.0% 11.6%

2.6% 1.3%37.0% 43.3% 40.3%47.6% 42.8% 45.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn researchfor jobs in localcommunity

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

9.295a 4 .05411.261 4 .024

.083 1 .773

397

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.38.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.014 .050 -.288 .774c

-.033 .050 -.652 .515c

397

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 4

5. Have You or Your Family Benefited from Auburn University?(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

75.6% 62.7% 68.9%24.4% 37.3% 31.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Have you or your familybenefited from AuburnTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.514b 1 .0047.924 1 .0058.584 1 .003

.004 .002

8.495 1 .004

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 66.17.b.

Symmetric Measures

.139 .047 2.940 .003c

.139 .047 2.940 .003c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 5

6. How Does Auburn University Funding Compare to Other Universitiesin the Southeast? (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

19.6% 20.5% 20.1%59.4% 61.4% 60.5%21.0% 18.1% 19.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

LessAbout the sameMore

How does Auburnfunding compare toother universities inthe Southeast

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.406a 2 .816

.405 2 .817

.275 1 .600

314

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.78.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.030 .057 -.523 .601c

-.030 .057 -.522 .602c

314

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 6

7. Auburn University Helps to Create Jobs in Alabama.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

1.5% .4% .9%4.4% 3.1% 3.7%.5% .2%

46.6% 45.8% 46.2%47.1% 50.7% 49.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn helpscreate jobs inAlabama

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.096a 4 .5423.523 4 .474

1.769 1 .184

429

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .48.a.

Symmetric Measures

.064 .048 1.331 .184c

.048 .048 .986 .325c

429

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 7

8. Auburn University Graduates Play an Important Role in Your LocalCommunity. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

3.0% 2.7% 2.8%8.5% 6.8% 7.6%2.5% .5% 1.4%

43.8% 41.6% 42.7%42.3% 48.4% 45.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn graduatesplay importantroles in localcommunity

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.464a 4 .3474.703 4 .319

1.613 1 .204

422

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.86.a.

Symmetric Measures

.062 .049 1.271 .204c

.070 .049 1.437 .151c

422

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 8

9. Auburn University Concentrates on Athletics Rather Than AcademicPrograms (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

12.4% 22.4% 17.7%28.9% 33.3% 31.2%

6.7% 4.6% 5.6%29.9% 22.8% 26.2%22.2% 16.9% 19.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn concentrateson athletic instead ofacademic programs

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.762a 4 .02910.906 4 .028

8.841 1 .003

413

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.80.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.146 .048 -3.002 .003c

-.147 .048 -3.023 .003c

413

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 9

10. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the South.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

3.0% 3.6% 3.3%7.1% 8.5% 7.8%3.0% 2.7% 2.8%

46.0% 40.2% 42.9%40.9% 45.1% 43.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is one ofthe bestuniversities inthe South

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.651a 4 .8001.652 4 .799

.000 1 .993

422

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.63.a.

Symmetric Measures

.000 .048 .009 .993c

.024 .049 .502 .616c

422

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 10

11. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the Nation.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

4.7% 9.1% 7.1%13.1% 13.7% 13.4%

4.2% 2.7% 3.4%48.7% 43.8% 46.1%29.3% 30.6% 30.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is oneof the bestuniversities inthe nation

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.051a 4 .3994.140 4 .387

.963 1 .326

410

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.52.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.049 .049 -.981 .327c

-.024 .049 -.478 .633c

410

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 11

12. Alabama Receives a Good Return on Its Investment from AuburnUniversity. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

.9% .5%3.4% 4.2% 3.8%1.1% .9% 1.0%

48.6% 38.0% 42.8%46.9% 56.0% 51.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

State receives agood return on itsinvestment fromAuburn

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.013a 4 .1986.768 4 .149

.420 1 .517

395

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .91.a.

Symmetric Measures

.033 .050 .648 .517c

.076 .050 1.513 .131c

395

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 12

13. The Quality of Higher Education in Alabama Affects Me.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

2.9% 3.5% 3.2%7.3% 4.4% 5.8%1.9% .4% 1.2%

32.0% 26.5% 29.2%55.8% 65.0% 60.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Quality of highereducation inAlabama affectsme

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.368a 4 .1736.499 4 .165

2.287 1 .130

432

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.38.a.

Symmetric Measures

.073 .048 1.515 .131c

.095 .048 1.976 .049c

432

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 13

14. I Learn About Alabama Universities from Newspapers.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

36.2% 32.0% 34.0%

63.8% 68.0% 66.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromnewspapersTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.838b 1 .360

.664 1 .415

.838 1 .360.367 .208

.836 1 .361

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 72.45.b.

Symmetric Measures

.044 .048 .914 .361c

.044 .048 .914 .361c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 14

15. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Radio.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

70.4% 68.9% 69.6%29.6% 31.1% 30.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from radioTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.127b 1 .721

.064 1 .800

.127 1 .721.756 .400

.127 1 .722

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 64.72.b.

Symmetric Measures

.017 .048 .356 .722c

.017 .048 .356 .722c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 15

16. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Magazines.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

72.8% 62.3% 67.3%

27.2% 37.7% 32.7%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities frommagazinesTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.510b 1 .0195.043 1 .0255.538 1 .019

.020 .012

5.497 1 .019

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 69.55.b.

Symmetric Measures

.112 .047 2.357 .019c

.112 .047 2.357 .019c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 16

17. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Television.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

46.0% 39.9% 42.9%54.0% 60.1% 57.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from T.V.Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.672b 1 .1961.432 1 .2311.672 1 .196

.211 .116

1.668 1 .197

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 91.29.b.

Symmetric Measures

.062 .048 1.292 .197c

.062 .048 1.292 .197c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 17

18. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Internet. (by IncomeCategory)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

74.2% 55.7% 64.6%

25.8% 44.3% 35.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromthe InternetTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

16.445b 1 .00015.647 1 .00016.636 1 .000

.000 .000

16.408 1 .000

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 75.35.b.

Symmetric Measures

.193 .046 4.124 .000c

.193 .046 4.124 .000c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 18

19. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Alumni. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

77.0% 57.0% 66.7%23.0% 43.0% 33.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from alumniTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

19.778b 1 .00018.889 1 .00020.081 1 .000

.000 .000

19.733 1 .000

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 71.00.b.

Symmetric Measures

.212 .046 4.540 .000c

.212 .046 4.540 .000c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 19

20. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Students.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

64.3% 61.8% 63.0%35.7% 38.2% 37.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from studentsTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.290b 1 .590

.193 1 .660

.290 1 .590.622 .330

.289 1 .591

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 78.73.b.

Symmetric Measures

.026 .048 .537 .591c

.026 .048 .537 .591c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 20

21. I Learn About Alabama Universities From My Co-workers.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

75.6% 64.0% 69.6%

24.4% 36.0% 30.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromco-workersTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.947b 1 .0086.412 1 .0116.997 1 .008

.010 .006

6.931 1 .008

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 64.72.b.

Symmetric Measures

.126 .047 2.651 .008c

.126 .047 2.651 .008c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 21

22. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Other Sources.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

85.9% 82.9% 84.4%14.1% 17.1% 15.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from otherTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.761b 1 .383

.550 1 .458

.764 1 .382.432 .229

.760 1 .383

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 33.33.b.

Symmetric Measures

.042 .047 .871 .384c

.042 .047 .871 .384c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 22

23. I Saw a Television Announcement About Auburn University Research.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

59.2% 43.9% 51.2%

40.8% 56.1% 48.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Seen any T.V.announcements aboutAuburn researchTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.311b 1 .0019.708 1 .002

10.354 1 .001.002 .001

10.288 1 .001

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 103.84.b.

Symmetric Measures

.153 .047 3.242 .001c

.153 .047 3.242 .001c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 23

24. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed A New Bulletproof Vest.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

77.5% 69.7% 73.5%22.5% 30.3% 26.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn developednew bulletproof vestTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.374b 1 .0662.989 1 .0843.391 1 .066

.068 .042

3.366 1 .067

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 56.51.b.

Symmetric Measures

.087 .047 1.840 .066c

.087 .047 1.840 .066c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 24

25. The Bulletproof Vest Research is Significant. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

2.1% 2.9% 2.6%97.9% 97.1% 97.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the bulletproof vestresearch significantTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.075b 1 .784

.000 1 1.000

.077 1 .7811.000 .634

.075 1 .785

117

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.23.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.025 .089 -.272 .786c

-.025 .089 -.272 .786c

117

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 25

26. I Saw a Television Announcement About the Bulletproof Vest.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

62.5% 52.2% 56.4%37.5% 47.8% 43.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout bulletproof vestTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.228b 1 .268.844 1 .358

1.234 1 .267.344 .179

1.217 1 .270

117

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.92.b.

Symmetric Measures

.102 .091 1.104 .272c

.102 .091 1.104 .272c

117

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 26

27. The Bulletproof Vest Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

9.1% 5.9%

100.0% 90.9% 94.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should bulletproofvest announcementbe continuedTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.739b 1 .187.484 1 .486

2.713 1 .100.544 .262

1.705 1 .192

51

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.06.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.185 .057 -1.315 .195c

-.185 .057 -1.315 .195c

51

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 27

28. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed New Airbags.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

75.1% 79.4% 77.3%24.9% 20.6% 22.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburndeveloped new airbagsTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.144b 1 .285.914 1 .339

1.144 1 .285.307 .170

1.142 1 .285

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 48.30.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.051 .048 -1.069 .286c

-.051 .048 -1.069 .286c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 28

29. The Airbag Research is Significant. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

5.7% 2.1% 4.0%94.3% 97.9% 96.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the airbag researchsignificantTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.810b 1 .368

.151 1 .698

.853 1 .356.620 .355

.801 1 .371

100

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.88.b.

Symmetric Measures

.090 .090 .894 .373c

.090 .090 .894 .373c

100

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 29

30. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's AirbagResearch.

(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

56.6% 59.6% 58.0%43.4% 40.4% 42.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout airbagsTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.090b 1 .764

.009 1 .922

.090 1 .764.840 .461

.089 1 .765

100

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.74.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.030 .100 -.298 .767c

-.030 .100 -.298 .767c

100

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 30

31. The Airbag Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

8.7% 5.3% 7.1%

91.3% 94.7% 92.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should airbagannouncementbe continuedTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.185b 1 .667

.000 1 1.000

.189 1 .6641.000 .573

.180 1 .671

42

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.36.b.

Symmetric Measures

.066 .148 .420 .676c

.066 .148 .420 .676c

42

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 31

32. I Am Aware That Auburn University Impacts the Economy.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

39.9% 29.8% 34.7%60.1% 70.2% 65.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn impactsthe economyTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.940b 1 .0264.505 1 .0344.945 1 .026

.028 .017

4.929 1 .026

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 73.90.b.

Symmetric Measures

.106 .047 2.230 .026c

.106 .047 2.230 .026c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 32

33. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's Impacts.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

60.2% 56.3% 58.0%39.8% 43.8% 42.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout the impactsTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.445b 1 .505

.299 1 .584

.446 1 .504.549 .292

.444 1 .505

288

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 53.78.b.

Symmetric Measures

.039 .059 .666 .506c

.039 .059 .666 .506c

288

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 33

34. The Impact Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

2.9% 1.7%

100.0% 97.1% 98.3%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should impactannouncementbe continuedTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.482b 1 .224.245 1 .620

2.214 1 .137.508 .333

1.469 1 .225

121

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .84.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.111 .040 -1.215 .227c

-.111 .040 -1.215 .227c

121

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 34

35. I Am Aware That Auburn University Improves Highway Construction.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

64.3% 61.4% 62.8%35.7% 38.6% 37.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn improvedhighway constructionTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.401b 1 .527

.286 1 .593

.401 1 .527.555 .297

.400 1 .527

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 79.21.b.

Symmetric Measures

.030 .048 .632 .528c

.030 .048 .632 .528c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 35

36. The Highway Construction Research is Significant.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

3.9% 1.8%

96.1% 100.0% 98.2%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is the highwayconstructionresearch significantTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.538b 1 .0601.682 1 .1954.680 1 .031

.097 .097

3.517 1 .061

164

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.39.b.

Symmetric Measures

.147 .043 1.890 .061c

.147 .043 1.890 .061c

164

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 36

37. I Am Aware That Auburn University Fisheries Sustains One of the World's Leading Food Sources. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

43.7% 33.8% 38.5%56.3% 66.2% 61.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn fisheriessustains food sourcesTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.547b 1 .0334.139 1 .0424.552 1 .033

.040 .021

4.537 1 .033

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 82.11.b.

Symmetric Measures

.102 .047 2.139 .033c

.102 .047 2.139 .033c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 37

38. The Fisheries Research is Significant. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

1.7% 1.3% 1.5%98.3% 98.7% 98.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the fisheries researchsignificantTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.054b 1 .817

.000 1 1.000

.053 1 .8171.000 .598

.054 1 .817

271

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.77.b.

Symmetric Measures

.014 .061 .231 .817c

.014 .061 .231 .817c

271

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 38

39. I Am Aware That Auburn University Architecture Students BuildLow-Income Housing in West Alabama. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

70.0% 64.5% 67.1%

30.0% 35.5% 32.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware architecturestudents build housingin West AlabamaTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.498b 1 .2211.260 1 .2621.501 1 .221

.226 .131

1.495 1 .221

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 70.03.b.

Symmetric Measures

.058 .047 1.223 .222c

.058 .047 1.223 .222c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 39

40. The Low-Income Housing Program in West Alabama Should Be Continued. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

1.6% 3.7% 2.8%98.4% 96.3% 97.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should housing programbe continuedTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.611b 1 .434

.074 1 .786

.648 1 .421.630 .403

.607 1 .436

145

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.77.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.065 .074 -.778 .438c

-.065 .074 -.778 .438c

145

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 40

41. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Continuing Education Programs.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

32.9% 25.9% 29.3%

67.1% 74.1% 70.7%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburncontinuingeducation programsTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.597b 1 .1072.271 1 .1322.598 1 .107

.117 .066

2.592 1 .107

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 62.31.b.

Symmetric Measures

.077 .048 1.613 .108c

.077 .048 1.613 .108c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 41

42. I Have Participated in a Continuing Education Program Offered byAuburn University. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

89.5% 81.1% 84.9%

10.5% 18.9% 15.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Have taken anycontinuingeducation programsTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.318b 1 .0383.683 1 .0554.427 1 .035

.040 .027

4.304 1 .038

312

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.54.b.

Symmetric Measures

.118 .054 2.086 .038c

.118 .054 2.086 .038c

312

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 42

43. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Partnerships With Local Schools.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

72.8% 59.2% 65.8%

27.2% 40.8% 34.2%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburnpartnerships withlocal schoolsTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.992b 1 .0038.400 1 .0049.057 1 .003

.004 .002

8.972 1 .003

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 72.93.b.

Symmetric Measures

.143 .047 3.023 .003c

.143 .047 3.023 .003c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 43

44. The School Partnerships Should Be Continued. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

1.1% .7%100.0% 98.9% 99.3%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should partnershipsbe continuedTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.628b 1 .428

.000 1 1.000

.974 1 .3241.000 .616

.624 1 .430

151

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.064 .032 -.789 .432c

-.064 .032 -.789 .432c

151

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 44

45. My Local School District Would Benefit From a Partnership.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

14.6% 11.4% 12.9%

85.4% 88.6% 87.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Would local schooldistrict benefit frompartnershipTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.971b 1 .324

.711 1 .399

.971 1 .324.394 .199

.969 1 .325

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.53.b.

Symmetric Measures

.047 .048 .984 .325c

.047 .048 .984 .325c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 45

46. I Am Familiar With Auburn University's Cooperative Extension System.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

56.3% 36.4% 46.0%43.7% 63.6% 54.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Familiar with CooperativeExtension SystemTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

17.615b 1 .00016.822 1 .00017.725 1 .000

.000 .000

17.575 1 .000

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 98.05.b.

Symmetric Measures

.200 .047 4.274 .000c

.200 .047 4.274 .000c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 46

47. I Have Used Services Provided by the Auburn University ExtensionSystem. (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

61.3% 45.5% 51.7%38.7% 54.5% 48.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Used any services fromExtension SystemTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.645b 1 .0185.031 1 .0255.681 1 .017

.024 .012

5.621 1 .018

238

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 44.94.b.

Symmetric Measures

.154 .064 2.394 .017c

.154 .064 2.394 .017c

238

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 47

48. The Cooperative Extension Programs Are Beneficial.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

2.8% 1.3% 1.7%97.2% 98.7% 98.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Are Extension programsbeneficialTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.331b 1 .565

.000 1 1.000

.307 1 .580.530 .530

.328 1 .567

115

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .63.b.

Symmetric Measures

.054 .102 .571 .569c

.054 .102 .571 .569c

115

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 48

49. Auburn University Should Offer More Distance Learning Programs.(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

10.8% 10.5% 10.7%89.2% 89.5% 89.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should Auburn offermore distance learningTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.009b 1 .926

.000 1 1.000

.009 1 .9261.000 .524

.009 1 .926

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.70.b.

Symmetric Measures

.004 .048 .092 .927c

.004 .048 .092 .927c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 49

50. Is Education an Important Issue? (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

3.8% 1.8% 2.7%96.2% 98.2% 97.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is education animportant issueTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.667b 1 .197.996 1 .318

1.691 1 .194.247 .159

1.663 1 .197

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.80.b.

Symmetric Measures

.061 .046 1.290 .198c

.061 .046 1.290 .198c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 50

51. Is Community and Economic Development an Important Issue?(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

7.0% 3.9% 5.4%

93.0% 96.1% 94.6%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is community andeconomic developmentan important issueTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.050b 1 .1521.492 1 .2222.064 1 .151

.207 .111

2.045 1 .153

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.59.b.

Symmetric Measures

.068 .047 1.432 .153c

.068 .047 1.432 .153c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 51

52. Is Agriculture an Important Issue? (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

11.3% 7.0% 9.1%88.7% 93.0% 90.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is agriculture animportant issueTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.412b 1 .1201.924 1 .1652.420 1 .120

.137 .083

2.406 1 .121

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.32.b.

Symmetric Measures

.074 .047 1.554 .121c

.074 .047 1.554 .121c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 52

53. Are Family and Youth Important Issues? (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

6.6% 4.8% 5.7%93.4% 95.2% 94.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is family and youth andimportant issueTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.629b 1 .428

.345 1 .557

.630 1 .427.537 .278

.628 1 .428

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.07.b.

Symmetric Measures

.038 .047 .792 .429c

.038 .047 .792 .429c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 53

54. Is the Environment an Important Issue? (by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

8.9% 5.7% 7.3%91.1% 94.3% 92.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the environmentan important issueTotal

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.695b 1 .1931.250 1 .2631.700 1 .192

.204 .132

1.691 1 .193

441

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.46.b.

Symmetric Measures

.062 .047 1.301 .194c

.062 .047 1.301 .194c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 54

55. How Significant is It to Have Outreach Programs in Your Community?(by Income Category)

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

5.6% 3.5% 4.5%4.7% 4.4% 4.5%5.2% 6.1% 5.7%2.8% .4% 1.6%

29.6% 34.6% 32.2%52.1% 50.9% 51.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How significantis it to haveoutreachprograms incommunity

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.141a 5 .2936.535 5 .258

.433 1 .511

441

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.38.a.

Symmetric Measures

.031 .048 .657 .511c

.008 .048 .161 .872c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 55

56. How Significant is it to Have Access to Information Over the Internet?(by Income Category)

* E

Crosstab

% within Income by Category

9.4% 3.5% 6.3%11.7% 6.6% 9.1%16.4% 13.6% 15.0%

1.4% 1.3% 1.4%18.3% 25.0% 21.8%42.7% 50.0% 46.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How Significantis it to accessinformation overthe Internet

Total

Under$40,000 Over $40,000

Income by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

13.346a 5 .02013.553 5 .019

10.744 1 .001

441

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.90.a.

Symmetric Measures

.156 .046 3.315 .001c

.129 .047 2.726 .007c

441

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix E: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Income CategoryPage E - 56

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey ResponsesControlled by Gender

1. How Familiar Are You With Auburn University? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

15.3% 8.3% 12.7%28.1% 22.4% 25.9%

1.0% 1.0% 1.0%35.1% 36.5% 35.6%20.4% 31.8% 24.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Not at all familiarNot very familiarNeutralFamiliarVery familiar

How familiarare you withAuburn

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

12.335a 4 .01512.482 4 .014

11.343 1 .001

505

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.90.a.

Symmetric Measures

.150 .043 3.403 .001c

.154 .043 3.502 .001c

505

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 1

2. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Alabama?(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

1.0% 1.6% 1.2%3.9% 6.4% 4.8%.7% .4%

41.0% 38.3% 40.0%53.4% 53.7% 53.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How importantis Auburn tothe quality oflife in Alabama

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.286a 4 .5113.920 4 .417

.582 1 .446

495

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .76.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.034 .046 -.763 .446c

-.009 .045 -.190 .849c

495

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 2

3. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Your LocalCommunity? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.3% 4.4% 3.1%18.0% 19.3% 18.5%

1.3% 1.7% 1.5%41.3% 44.8% 42.6%37.0% 29.8% 34.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn to thequality of life inlocal community

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.766a 4 .4393.738 4 .443

2.234 1 .135

481

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.63.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.068 .046 -1.497 .135c

-.074 .045 -1.633 .103c

481

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 3

4. How Important is Auburn University Research for Jobs in Your LocalCommunity? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.9% .6% 2.0%10.5% 13.9% 11.8%

1.1% 1.7% 1.3%40.9% 39.3% 40.3%44.6% 44.5% 44.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn researchfor jobs in localcommunity

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.281a 4 .3694.812 4 .307

.002 1 .963

449

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.31.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.002 .047 -.047 .963c

-.005 .047 -.110 .912c

449

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 4

5. Have You or Your Family Benefited from Auburn University?(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

69.6% 68.9% 69.4%30.4% 31.1% 30.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Have you or your familybenefited from AuburnTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.030b 1 .861

.006 1 .940

.030 1 .861.921 .469

.030 1 .862

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 59.12.b.

Symmetric Measures

.008 .045 .174 .862c

.008 .045 .174 .862c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 5

6. How Does Auburn University Funding Compare to Other Universitiesin the Southeast? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

18.7% 22.9% 20.4%60.8% 60.4% 60.6%20.6% 16.7% 19.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

LessAbout the sameMore

How does Auburnfunding compare toother universities inthe Southeast

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.445a 2 .4861.447 2 .485

1.440 1 .230

353

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.33.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.064 .053 -1.201 .231c

-.064 .053 -1.201 .231c

353

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 6

7. Auburn University Helps to Create Jobs in Alabama.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

1.3% 1.6% 1.4%4.7% 3.6% 4.3%.3% .2%

46.8% 45.8% 46.4%46.8% 49.0% 47.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn helpscreate jobs inAlabama

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.114a 4 .8921.469 4 .832

.265 1 .606

491

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .39.a.

Symmetric Measures

.023 .045 .515 .607c

.024 .045 .540 .590c

491

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 7

8. Auburn University Graduates Play an Important Role in Your LocalCommunity. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.7% 3.8% 3.1%7.7% 6.5% 7.3%2.0% 1.1% 1.7%

40.4% 46.5% 42.7%47.1% 42.2% 45.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn graduatesplay importantroles in localcommunity

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.900a 4 .5752.928 4 .570

.261 1 .609

482

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.023 .046 -.511 .610c

-.037 .045 -.808 .419c

482

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 8

9. Auburn University Concentrates on Athletics Instead of AcademicPrograms (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

16.4% 16.5% 16.5%28.0% 34.6% 30.6%

5.6% 5.9% 5.7%30.8% 22.9% 27.6%19.2% 20.2% 19.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn concentrateson athletic instead ofacademic programs

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.245a 4 .3744.285 4 .369

.894 1 .344

474

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.71.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.043 .046 -.946 .345c

-.037 .046 -.815 .416c

474

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 9

10. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the South.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.7% 4.8% 3.5%8.0% 8.0% 8.0%3.0% 3.7% 3.3%

43.5% 44.4% 43.8%42.8% 39.0% 41.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is one ofthe bestuniversities inthe South

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.108a 4 .7162.061 4 .724

1.277 1 .258

486

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.16.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.051 .046 -1.131 .259c

-.046 .045 -1.020 .308c

486

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 10

11. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the Nation.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

7.0% 9.3% 7.9%13.3% 14.8% 13.9%

3.2% 4.9% 3.8%46.3% 42.6% 44.9%30.2% 28.4% 29.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is oneof the bestuniversities inthe nation

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.243a 4 .6912.210 4 .697

1.259 1 .262

468

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.04.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.052 .047 -1.122 .262c

-.046 .047 -.996 .320c

468

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 11

12. Alabama Receives a Good Return on Its Investment from Auburn University. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

.4% .6% .4%4.0% 3.4% 3.8%1.8% 1.1% 1.5%

45.8% 40.1% 43.6%48.0% 54.8% 50.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

State receives agood return on itsinvestment fromAuburn

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.322a 4 .6772.335 4 .674

1.283 1 .257

452

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .78.a.

Symmetric Measures

.053 .047 1.133 .258c

.066 .047 1.402 .162c

452

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 12

13. The Quality of Higher Education in Alabama Affects Me.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

4.6% 2.1% 3.6%4.9% 5.8% 5.3%.7% 2.6% 1.4%

28.9% 32.6% 30.3%61.0% 56.8% 59.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Quality of highereducation inAlabama affectsme

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.279a 4 .1796.340 4 .175

.002 1 .965

495

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.69.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.002 .044 -.044 .965c

-.034 .045 -.750 .453c

495

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 13

14. I Learn About Alabama Universities from Newspapers.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

36.7% 32.6% 35.2%

63.3% 67.4% 64.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromnewspapersTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.880b 1 .348

.709 1 .400

.884 1 .347.389 .200

.878 1 .349

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 67.89.b.

Symmetric Measures

.042 .044 .937 .349c

.042 .044 .937 .349c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 14

15. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Radio.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

73.5% 67.4% 71.1%26.5% 32.6% 28.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from radioTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.182b 1 .1401.894 1 .1692.163 1 .141

.157 .085

2.177 1 .140

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 55.69.b.

Symmetric Measures

.066 .045 1.477 .140c

.066 .045 1.477 .140c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 15

16. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Magazines.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

69.6% 66.8% 68.6%

30.4% 33.2% 31.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities frommagazinesTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.437b 1 .508

.317 1 .574

.436 1 .509.554 .286

.436 1 .509

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 60.65.b.

Symmetric Measures

.029 .045 .660 .509c

.029 .045 .660 .509c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 16

17. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Television.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

43.1% 43.5% 43.3%56.9% 56.5% 56.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from T.V.Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.007b 1 .931

.000 1 1.000

.007 1 .9311.000 .502

.007 1 .931

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 83.53.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.004 .044 -.086 .931c

-.004 .044 -.086 .931c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 17

18. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Internet. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

66.8% 64.2% 65.8%

33.2% 35.8% 34.2%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromthe InternetTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.338b 1 .561

.235 1 .628

.337 1 .561.564 .313

.337 1 .561

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 65.99.b.

Symmetric Measures

.026 .045 .581 .562c

.026 .045 .581 .562c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 18

19. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Alumni. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

67.4% 67.4% 67.4%32.6% 32.6% 32.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from alumniTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.000b 1 .990

.000 1 1.000

.000 1 .9901.000 .533

.000 1 .990

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 62.93.b.

Symmetric Measures

.001 .044 .013 .990c

.001 .044 .013 .990c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 19

20. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Students.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

63.9% 64.2% 64.0%36.1% 35.8% 36.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from studentsTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.006b 1 .936

.000 1 1.000

.006 1 .9361.000 .507

.006 1 .936

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 69.42.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.004 .044 -.080 .936c

-.004 .044 -.080 .936c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 20

21. I Learn About Alabama Universities From My Co-workers.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

70.0% 71.5% 70.6%

30.0% 28.5% 29.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromco-workersTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.135b 1 .713

.072 1 .789

.136 1 .713.764 .396

.135 1 .713

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 56.83.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.016 .044 -.367 .714c

-.016 .044 -.367 .714c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 21

22. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Other Sources.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

83.1% 86.0% 84.2%16.9% 14.0% 15.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from otherTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.777b 1 .378

.572 1 .450

.787 1 .375.452 .226

.775 1 .379

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 30.51.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.039 .044 -.880 .379c

-.039 .044 -.880 .379c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 22

23. I Saw a Television Announcement About Auburn University Research.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

54.0% 47.2% 51.4%

46.0% 52.8% 48.6%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Seen any T.V.announcements aboutAuburn researchTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.238b 1 .1351.973 1 .1602.239 1 .135

.144 .080

2.234 1 .135

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 93.83.b.

Symmetric Measures

.067 .044 1.496 .135c

.067 .044 1.496 .135c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 23

24. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed A New Bulletproof Vest.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

78.0% 69.9% 74.9%22.0% 30.1% 25.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn developednew bulletproof vestTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.072b 1 .0443.657 1 .0564.018 1 .045

.046 .028

4.063 1 .044

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 48.44.b.

Symmetric Measures

.090 .045 2.022 .044c

.090 .045 2.022 .044c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 24

25. The Bulletproof Vest Research is Significant. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.9% 3.4% 3.1%97.1% 96.6% 96.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the bulletproof vestresearch significantTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.031b 1 .860

.000 1 1.000

.031 1 .8601.000 .622

.031 1 .860

127

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.83.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.016 .089 -.175 .861c

-.016 .089 -.175 .861c

127

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 25

26. I Saw a Television Announcement About the Bulletproof Vest.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

60.9% 48.3% 55.1%39.1% 51.7% 44.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout bulletproof vestTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.020b 1 .1551.543 1 .2142.023 1 .155

.210 .107

2.004 1 .157

127

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 26.03.b.

Symmetric Measures

.126 .088 1.421 .158c

.126 .088 1.421 .158c

127

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 26

27. The Bulletproof Vest Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

7.4% 6.7% 7.0%

92.6% 93.3% 93.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should bulletproofvest announcementbe continuedTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.012b 1 .913

.000 1 1.000

.012 1 .9131.000 .653

.012 1 .914

57

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.89.b.

Symmetric Measures

.014 .133 .107 .915c

.014 .133 .107 .915c

57

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 27

28. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed New Airbags.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

79.9% 75.6% 78.3%20.1% 24.4% 21.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburndeveloped new airbagsTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.252b 1 .2631.016 1 .3131.240 1 .265

.269 .157

1.250 1 .264

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 41.96.b.

Symmetric Measures

.050 .045 1.118 .264c

.050 .045 1.118 .264c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 28

29. The Airbag Research is Significant. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

4.8% 2.1% 3.6%95.2% 97.9% 96.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the airbag researchsignificantTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.533b 1 .465

.046 1 .830

.565 1 .452.634 .426

.528 1 .467

110

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.71.b.

Symmetric Measures

.070 .085 .725 .470c

.070 .085 .725 .470c

110

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 29

Crosstab

% within Gender

58.7% 55.3% 57.3%41.3% 44.7% 42.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout airbagsTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 30

30. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's AirbagResearch.

(by Gender)

Chi-Square Tests

.128b 1 .721

.027 1 .871

.128 1 .721.846 .435

.127 1 .722

110

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.08.b.

Symmetric Measures

.034 .095 .355 .724c

.034 .095 .355 .724c

110

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 31

31. The Airbag Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

7.7% 9.5% 8.5%

92.3% 90.5% 91.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should airbagannouncementbe continuedTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.050b 1 .823

.000 1 1.000

.050 1 .8231.000 .610

.049 1 .825

47

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.79.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.033 .147 -.219 .828c

-.033 .147 -.219 .828c

47

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 32

32. I Am Aware That Auburn University Impacts the Economy.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

38.0% 32.1% 35.8%62.0% 67.9% 64.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn impactsthe economyTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.806b 1 .1791.558 1 .2121.818 1 .178

.183 .106

1.802 1 .179

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 69.04.b.

Symmetric Measures

.060 .044 1.343 .180c

.060 .044 1.343 .180c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 33

33. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's Impacts.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

54.6% 61.8% 57.5%45.4% 38.2% 42.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout the impactsTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.656b 1 .1981.375 1 .2411.662 1 .197

.210 .120

1.651 1 .199

325

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 55.62.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.071 .055 -1.286 .199c

-.071 .055 -1.286 .199c

325

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 34

34. The Impact Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.3% 2.0% 2.2%

97.7% 98.0% 97.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should impactannouncementbe continuedTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.011b 1 .916

.000 1 1.000

.011 1 .9151.000 .703

.011 1 .916

138

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.09.b.

Symmetric Measures

.009 .084 .105 .917c

.009 .084 .105 .917c

138

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 35

35. I Am Aware That Auburn University Improves Highway Construction.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

67.1% 57.5% 63.4%32.9% 42.5% 36.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn improvedhighway constructionTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.724b 1 .0304.320 1 .0384.694 1 .030

.036 .019

4.714 1 .030

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 70.56.b.

Symmetric Measures

.097 .045 2.179 .030c

.097 .045 2.179 .030c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 36

36. The Highway Construction Research is Significant.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.9% 1.2% 2.2%

97.1% 98.8% 97.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is the highwayconstructionresearch significantTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.619b 1 .432

.077 1 .781

.656 1 .418.631 .401

.615 1 .433

185

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.77.b.

Symmetric Measures

.058 .066 .784 .434c

.058 .066 .784 .434c

185

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 37

37. I Am Aware That Auburn University Fisheries Sustains One of the World's Leading Food Sources. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

45.7% 30.1% 39.7%54.3% 69.9% 60.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn fisheriessustains food sourcesTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

12.189b 1 .00011.544 1 .00112.395 1 .000

.001 .000

12.165 1 .000

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 76.67.b.

Symmetric Measures

.155 .043 3.527 .000c

.155 .043 3.527 .000c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 38

38. The Fisheries Research is Significant. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

1.2% 2.2% 1.6%98.8% 97.8% 98.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the fisheries researchsignificantTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.510b 1 .475

.068 1 .795

.507 1 .477.658 .393

.509 1 .476

305

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.21.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.041 .057 -.713 .477c

-.041 .057 -.713 .477c

305

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 39

39. I Am Aware That Auburn University Architecture Students BuildLow-Income Housing in West Alabama. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

65.5% 71.0% 67.6%

34.5% 29.0% 32.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware architecturestudents build housingin West AlabamaTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.642b 1 .2001.401 1 .2371.655 1 .198

.206 .118

1.639 1 .200

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 62.55.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.057 .044 -1.281 .201c

-.057 .044 -1.281 .201c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 40

40. The Low-Income Housing Program in West Alabama Should Be Continued.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.8% 3.6% 3.0%97.2% 96.4% 97.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should housing programbe continuedTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.079b 1 .779

.000 1 1.000

.077 1 .7821.000 .557

.078 1 .780

164

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.71.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.022 .081 -.279 .781c

-.022 .081 -.279 .781c

164

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 41

41. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Continuing Education Programs.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

28.4% 30.1% 29.1%

71.6% 69.9% 70.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburncontinuingeducation programsTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.152b 1 .697

.083 1 .773

.151 1 .697.762 .385

.151 1 .697

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 56.07.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.017 .045 -.389 .698c

-.017 .045 -.389 .698c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 42

42. I Have Participated in a Continuing Education Program Offered byAuburn University. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

85.7% 85.2% 85.5%

14.3% 14.8% 14.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Have taken anycontinuingeducation programsTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.019b 1 .890

.000 1 1.000

.019 1 .890.878 .503

.019 1 .890

359

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.55.b.

Symmetric Measures

.007 .053 .138 .891c

.007 .053 .138 .891c

359

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 43

43. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Partnerships With Local Schools.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

65.5% 68.9% 66.8%

34.5% 31.1% 33.2%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburnpartnerships withlocal schoolsTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.628b 1 .428

.484 1 .487

.631 1 .427.439 .244

.627 1 .428

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 64.08.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.035 .044 -.792 .429c

-.035 .044 -.792 .429c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 44

44. The School Partnerships Should Be Continued. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

1.7% .6%100.0% 98.3% 99.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should partnershipsbe continuedTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.811b 1 .178.089 1 .765

2.070 1 .150.357 .357

1.800 1 .180

168

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .36.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.104 .052 -1.345 .180c

-.104 .052 -1.345 .180c

168

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 45

45. My Local School District Would Benefit From a Partnership.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

14.4% 12.4% 13.6%

85.6% 87.6% 86.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Would local schooldistrict benefit frompartnershipTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.382b 1 .536

.235 1 .628

.386 1 .534.595 .316

.381 1 .537

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 26.32.b.

Symmetric Measures

.027 .044 .617 .537c

.027 .044 .617 .537c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 46

46. I Am Familiar With Auburn University's Cooperative Extension System.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

47.9% 44.0% 46.4%52.1% 56.0% 53.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Familiar with CooperativeExtension SystemTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.723b 1 .395

.576 1 .448

.724 1 .395.410 .224

.722 1 .396

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 89.63.b.

Symmetric Measures

.038 .044 .849 .396c

.038 .044 .849 .396c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 47

47. I Have Used Services Provided by the Auburn University ExtensionSystem. (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

48.5% 59.3% 52.8%51.5% 40.7% 47.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Used any services fromExtension SystemTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.036b 1 .0812.619 1 .1063.048 1 .081

.084 .053

3.025 1 .082

271

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 51.01.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.106 .060 -1.746 .082c

-.106 .060 -1.746 .082c

271

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 48

48. The Cooperative Extension Programs Are Beneficial.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

1.2% 2.3% 1.6%98.8% 97.7% 98.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Are Extension programsbeneficialTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.220b 1 .639

.000 1 1.000

.209 1 .6481.000 .571

.218 1 .640

128

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .69.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.041 .094 -.466 .642c

-.041 .094 -.466 .642c

128

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 49

49. Auburn University Should Offer More Distance Learning Programs.(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

9.6% 15.0% 11.7%90.4% 85.0% 88.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should Auburn offermore distance learningTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.432b 1 .0642.924 1 .0873.351 1 .067

.086 .045

3.425 1 .064

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.50.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.082 .046 -1.855 .064c

-.082 .046 -1.855 .064c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 50

50. Is Education an Important Issue? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

2.6% 3.1% 2.8%97.4% 96.9% 97.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is education animportant issueTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.136b 1 .713

.008 1 .929

.134 1 .715.783 .456

.135 1 .713

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.34.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.016 .045 -.368 .713c

-.016 .045 -.368 .713c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 51

51. Is Community and Economic Development an Important Issue?(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

5.1% 5.2% 5.1%

94.9% 94.8% 94.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is community andeconomic developmentan important issueTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.001b 1 .973

.000 1 1.000

.001 1 .9731.000 .563

.001 1 .973

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.92.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.002 .045 -.034 .973c

-.002 .045 -.034 .973c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 52

52. Is Agriculture an Important Issue? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

10.2% 10.4% 10.3%89.8% 89.6% 89.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is agriculture animportant issueTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.003b 1 .960

.000 1 1.000

.003 1 .9601.000 .536

.002 1 .960

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.83.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.002 .045 -.050 .960c

-.002 .045 -.050 .960c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 53

53. Are Family and Youth Important Issues? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

3.8% 10.4% 6.3%96.2% 89.6% 93.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is family and youth andimportant issueTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.590b 1 .0037.523 1 .0068.288 1 .004

.004 .003

8.573 1 .003

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.21.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.130 .045 -2.950 .003c

-.130 .045 -2.950 .003c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 54

54. Is the Environment an Important Issue? (by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

6.7% 8.8% 7.5%93.3% 91.2% 92.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the environmentan important issueTotal

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.757b 1 .384

.485 1 .486

.744 1 .388.390 .241

.756 1 .385

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.49.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.039 .045 -.869 .385c

-.039 .045 -.869 .385c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 55

55. How Significant is It to Have Outreach Programs in Your Community?(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

3.8% 5.2% 4.3%4.5% 5.2% 4.7%4.8% 8.3% 6.1%1.0% 3.6% 2.0%

33.9% 32.1% 33.2%52.1% 45.6% 49.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How significantis it to haveoutreachprograms incommunity

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.431a 5 .1348.214 5 .145

3.544 1 .060

506

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (8.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.81.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.084 .045 -1.887 .060c

-.083 .045 -1.871 .062c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 56

56. How Significant is it to Have Access to Information Over the Internet?(by Gender)

Crosstab

% within Gender

6.4% 6.7% 6.5%10.2% 10.4% 10.3%17.6% 10.9% 15.0%

1.0% 2.6% 1.6%19.5% 25.4% 21.7%45.4% 44.0% 44.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How Significantis it to accessinformation overthe Internet

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.553a 5 .1837.607 5 .179

.312 1 .577

506

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.05.a.

Symmetric Measures

.025 .044 .558 .577c

.009 .044 .206 .837c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix F: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by GenderPage F - 57

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey ResponsesControlled by Alumni Status

1. How Familiar Are You With Auburn University? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

14.6% 5.0% 12.7%31.4% 4.0% 25.9%

1.2% 1.0%37.6% 27.7% 35.6%15.1% 63.4% 24.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Not at all familiarNot very familiarNeutralFamiliarVery familiar

How familiarare you withAuburn

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

108.977a 4 .000105.709 4 .000

71.833 1 .000

505

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.00.a.

Symmetric Measures

.378 .036 9.144 .000c

.411 .038 10.118 .000c

505

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 1

2. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Alabama?(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

1.3% 1.0% 1.2%5.8% 1.0% 4.8%.3% 1.0% .4%

41.9% 32.7% 40.0%50.8% 64.4% 53.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How importantis Auburn tothe quality oflife in Alabama

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

9.505a 4 .05010.718 4 .030

6.417 1 .011

495

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

5 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .41.a.

Symmetric Measures

.114 .038 2.547 .011c

.117 .042 2.607 .009c

495

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 2

3. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Your LocalCommunity? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

3.4% 2.0% 3.1%20.7% 10.1% 18.5%

1.6% 1.0% 1.5%43.5% 39.4% 42.6%30.9% 47.5% 34.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn to thequality of life inlocal community

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

12.017a 4 .01712.312 4 .015

10.397 1 .001

481

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.44.a.

Symmetric Measures

.147 .041 3.256 .001c

.157 .044 3.476 .001c

481

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 3

4. How Important is Auburn University Research for Jobs in Your LocalCommunity? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

2.0% 2.2% 2.0%12.6% 8.6% 11.8%

1.1% 2.2% 1.3%40.2% 40.9% 40.3%44.1% 46.2% 44.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn researchfor jobs in localcommunity

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.697a 4 .7911.711 4 .789

.502 1 .479

449

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.24.a.

Symmetric Measures

.033 .045 .708 .479c

.027 .046 .561 .575c

449

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 4

5. Have You or Your Family Benefited from Auburn University?(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

77.5% 36.6% 69.4%22.5% 63.4% 30.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Have you or your familybenefited from AuburnTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

63.632b 1 .00061.722 1 .00059.259 1 .000

.000 .000

63.506 1 .000

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 30.94.b.

Symmetric Measures

.355 .046 8.515 .000c

.355 .046 8.515 .000c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 5

6. How Does Auburn University Funding Compare to Other Universitiesin the Southeast? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

18.8% 26.8% 20.4%62.4% 53.5% 60.6%18.8% 19.7% 19.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

LessAbout the sameMore

How does Auburnfunding compare toother universities inthe Southeast

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.530a 2 .2822.435 2 .296

.713 1 .399

353

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.48.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.045 .056 -.844 .399c

-.045 .057 -.853 .394c

353

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 6

7. Auburn University Helps to Create Jobs in Alabama.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

1.5% 1.0% 1.4%4.3% 4.1% 4.3%.3% .2%

50.4% 30.6% 46.4%43.5% 64.3% 47.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn helpscreate jobs inAlabama

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

14.106a 4 .00714.486 4 .006

6.312 1 .012

491

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .20.a.

Symmetric Measures

.113 .044 2.526 .012c

.156 .044 3.498 .001c

491

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 7

8. Auburn University Graduates Play an Important Role in Your LocalCommunity. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

3.4% 2.0% 3.1%7.3% 7.1% 7.3%2.1% 1.7%

45.3% 32.7% 42.7%41.9% 58.2% 45.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn graduatesplay importantroles in localcommunity

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

9.976a 4 .04111.536 4 .021

3.995 1 .046

482

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.63.a.

Symmetric Measures

.091 .044 2.005 .046c

.124 .045 2.729 .007c

482

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 8

9. Auburn University Concentrates on Athletics Rather Than AcademicPrograms (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

16.0% 18.2% 16.5%29.6% 34.3% 30.6%

6.1% 4.0% 5.7%28.0% 26.3% 27.6%20.3% 17.2% 19.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn concentrateson athletic instead ofacademic programs

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.873a 4 .7591.916 4 .751

1.120 1 .290

474

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.64.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.049 .046 -1.059 .290c

-.048 .046 -1.046 .296c

474

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 9

10. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the South.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

4.4% 3.5%9.3% 3.0% 8.0%3.9% 1.0% 3.3%

46.3% 34.3% 43.8%36.2% 61.6% 41.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is one ofthe bestuniversities inthe South

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

25.068a 4 .00028.930 4 .000

21.482 1 .000

486

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.26.a.

Symmetric Measures

.210 .032 4.736 .000c

.226 .040 5.102 .000c

486

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 10

11. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the Nation.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

9.4% 2.1% 7.9%14.8% 10.4% 13.9%

4.0% 3.1% 3.8%45.4% 42.7% 44.9%26.3% 41.7% 29.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is oneof the bestuniversities inthe nation

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

12.593a 4 .01313.837 4 .008

10.941 1 .001

468

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.69.a.

Symmetric Measures

.153 .040 3.344 .001c

.158 .044 3.454 .001c

468

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 11

12. Alabama Receives a Good Return on Its Investment from AuburnUniversity. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

.6% .4%4.5% 1.0% 3.8%1.4% 2.1% 1.5%

46.8% 32.0% 43.6%46.8% 64.9% 50.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

State receives agood return on itsinvestment fromAuburn

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

12.008a 4 .01713.164 4 .011

9.466 1 .002

452

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .43.a.

Symmetric Measures

.145 .038 3.106 .002c

.152 .045 3.252 .001c

452

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 12

13. The Quality of Higher Education in Alabama Affects Me.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

4.3% 1.0% 3.6%6.1% 2.0% 5.3%1.3% 2.0% 1.4%

32.2% 22.8% 30.3%56.1% 72.3% 59.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Quality of highereducation inAlabama affectsme

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

11.239a 4 .02412.607 4 .013

8.990 1 .003

495

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.43.a.

Symmetric Measures

.135 .034 3.023 .003c

.139 .041 3.126 .002c

495

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 13

14. I Learn About Alabama Universities from Newspapers.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

37.0% 27.7% 35.2%

63.0% 72.3% 64.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromnewspapersTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.076b 1 .0792.681 1 .1023.166 1 .075

.082 .049

3.070 1 .080

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35.53.b.

Symmetric Measures

.078 .042 1.756 .080c

.078 .042 1.756 .080c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 14

15. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Radio.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

72.8% 64.4% 71.1%27.2% 35.6% 28.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from radioTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.834b 1 .0922.436 1 .1192.749 1 .097

.110 .061

2.828 1 .093

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.14.b.

Symmetric Measures

.075 .046 1.685 .093c

.075 .046 1.685 .093c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 15

16. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Magazines.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

70.6% 60.4% 68.6%

29.4% 39.6% 31.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities frommagazinesTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.919b 1 .0483.459 1 .0633.805 1 .051

.055 .033

3.912 1 .048

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 31.74.b.

Symmetric Measures

.088 .046 1.984 .048c

.088 .046 1.984 .048c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 16

17. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Television.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

42.5% 46.5% 43.3%57.5% 53.5% 56.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from T.V.Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.544b 1 .461

.391 1 .532

.542 1 .462.501 .265

.543 1 .461

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 43.71.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.033 .045 -.737 .462c

-.033 .045 -.737 .462c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 17

18. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Internet. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

66.7% 62.4% 65.8%

33.3% 37.6% 34.2%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromthe InternetTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.661b 1 .416

.484 1 .486

.654 1 .419.415 .242

.660 1 .417

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 34.53.b.

Symmetric Measures

.036 .045 .812 .417c

.036 .045 .812 .417c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 18

19. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Alumni. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

71.9% 49.5% 67.4%28.1% 50.5% 32.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from alumniTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

18.371b 1 .00017.368 1 .00017.522 1 .000

.000 .000

18.334 1 .000

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 32.93.b.

Symmetric Measures

.191 .047 4.357 .000c

.191 .047 4.357 .000c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 19

20. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Students.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

66.4% 54.5% 64.0%33.6% 45.5% 36.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from studentsTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.024b 1 .0254.518 1 .0344.911 1 .027

.028 .018

5.014 1 .025

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 36.33.b.

Symmetric Measures

.100 .046 2.248 .025c

.100 .046 2.248 .025c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 20

21. I Learn About Alabama Universities From My Co-workers.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

70.1% 72.3% 70.6%

29.9% 27.7% 29.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromco-workersTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.180b 1 .671

.092 1 .762

.182 1 .670.716 .385

.180 1 .671

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.74.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.019 .044 -.424 .672c

-.019 .044 -.424 .672c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 21

22. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Other Sources.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

84.7% 82.2% 84.2%15.3% 17.8% 15.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from otherTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.384b 1 .536

.218 1 .641

.374 1 .541.543 .315

.383 1 .536

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.97.b.

Symmetric Measures

.028 .046 .618 .537c

.028 .046 .618 .537c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 22

23. I Saw a Television Announcement About Auburn University Research.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

54.3% 39.6% 51.4%

45.7% 60.4% 48.6%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Seen any T.V.announcements aboutAuburn researchTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.009b 1 .0086.432 1 .0117.039 1 .008

.010 .006

6.995 1 .008

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 49.10.b.

Symmetric Measures

.118 .044 2.661 .008c

.118 .044 2.661 .008c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 23

24. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed A New Bulletproof Vest.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

77.5% 64.4% 74.9%22.5% 35.6% 25.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn developednew bulletproof vestTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.464b 1 .0066.779 1 .0097.055 1 .008

.010 .005

7.449 1 .006

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 25.35.b.

Symmetric Measures

.121 .048 2.747 .006c

.121 .048 2.747 .006c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 24

25. The Bulletproof Vest Research is Significant. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

3.3% 2.8% 3.1%96.7% 97.2% 96.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the bulletproof vestresearch significantTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.023b 1 .880

.000 1 1.000

.023 1 .8791.000 .682

.023 1 .881

127

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.13.b.

Symmetric Measures

.013 .085 .150 .881c

.013 .085 .150 .881c

127

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 25

26. I Saw a Television Announcement About the Bulletproof Vest.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

54.9% 55.6% 55.1%45.1% 44.4% 44.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout bulletproof vestTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.004b 1 .950

.000 1 1.000

.004 1 .9501.000 .555

.004 1 .950

127

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.16.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.006 .089 -.062 .951c

-.006 .089 -.062 .951c

127

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 26

27. The Bulletproof Vest Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

7.3% 6.3% 7.0%

92.7% 93.8% 93.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should bulletproofvest announcementbe continuedTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.020b 1 .887

.000 1 1.000

.021 1 .8861.000 .688

.020 1 .888

57

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.12.b.

Symmetric Measures

.019 .128 .139 .890c

.019 .128 .139 .890c

57

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 27

28. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed New Airbags.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

78.8% 76.2% 78.3%21.2% 23.8% 21.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburndeveloped new airbagsTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.304b 1 .582

.173 1 .677

.299 1 .585.591 .334

.303 1 .582

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.96.b.

Symmetric Measures

.024 .046 .550 .583c

.024 .046 .550 .583c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 28

29. The Airbag Research is Significant. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

2.3% 8.3% 3.6%97.7% 91.7% 96.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the airbag researchsignificantTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.933b 1 .164.598 1 .439

1.600 1 .206.207 .207

1.915 1 .166

110

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .87.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.133 .118 -1.390 .167c

-.133 .118 -1.390 .167c

110

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 29

30. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's AirbagResearch.

(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

60.5% 45.8% 57.3%39.5% 54.2% 42.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout airbagsTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.642b 1 .2001.098 1 .2951.627 1 .202

.246 .147

1.627 1 .202

110

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.25.b.

Symmetric Measures

.122 .096 1.279 .204c

.122 .096 1.279 .204c

110

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 30

31. The Airbag Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

8.8% 7.7% 8.5%

91.2% 92.3% 91.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should airbagannouncementbe continuedTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.015b 1 .901

.000 1 1.000

.016 1 .9001.000 .696

.015 1 .902

47

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.11.b.

Symmetric Measures

.018 .142 .122 .904c

.018 .142 .122 .904c

47

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 31

32. I Am Aware That Auburn University Impacts the Economy.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

40.2% 17.8% 35.8%59.8% 82.2% 64.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn impactsthe economyTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

17.694b 1 .00016.732 1 .00019.299 1 .000

.000 .000

17.659 1 .000

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 36.13.b.

Symmetric Measures

.187 .038 4.274 .000c

.187 .038 4.274 .000c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 32

33. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's Impacts.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

59.5% 51.8% 57.5%40.5% 48.2% 42.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout the impactsTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.499b 1 .2211.200 1 .2731.490 1 .222

.248 .137

1.494 1 .222

325

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35.24.b.

Symmetric Measures

.068 .056 1.223 .222c

.068 .056 1.223 .222c

325

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 33

34. The Impact Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

2.0% 2.5% 2.2%

98.0% 97.5% 97.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should impactannouncementbe continuedTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.028b 1 .867

.000 1 1.000

.027 1 .8681.000 .645

.028 1 .867

138

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .87.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.014 .088 -.167 .868c

-.014 .088 -.167 .868c

138

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 34

35. I Am Aware That Auburn University Improves Highway Construction.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

66.4% 51.5% 63.4%33.6% 48.5% 36.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn improvedhighway constructionTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.774b 1 .0057.143 1 .0087.580 1 .006

.008 .004

7.759 1 .005

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 36.93.b.

Symmetric Measures

.124 .046 2.804 .005c

.124 .046 2.804 .005c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 35

36. The Highway Construction Research is Significant.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

2.2% 2.0% 2.2%

97.8% 98.0% 97.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is the highwayconstructionresearch significantTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.005b 1 .946

.000 1 1.000

.005 1 .9451.000 .714

.005 1 .946

185

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.06.b.

Symmetric Measures

.005 .072 .068 .946c

.005 .072 .068 .946c

185

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 36

37. I Am Aware That Auburn University Fisheries Sustains One of the World's Leading Food Sources. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

42.5% 28.7% 39.7%57.5% 71.3% 60.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn fisheriessustains food sourcesTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.389b 1 .0115.827 1 .0166.599 1 .010

.012 .007

6.376 1 .012

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40.12.b.

Symmetric Measures

.112 .042 2.539 .011c

.112 .042 2.539 .011c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 37

38. The Fisheries Research is Significant. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

1.7% 1.4% 1.6%98.3% 98.6% 98.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the fisheries researchsignificantTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.037b 1 .848

.000 1 1.000

.038 1 .8451.000 .662

.037 1 .848

305

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.18.b.

Symmetric Measures

.011 .054 .191 .849c

.011 .054 .191 .849c

305

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 38

39. I Am Aware That Auburn University Architecture Students BuildLow-Income Housing in West Alabama. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

68.6% 63.4% 67.6%

31.4% 36.6% 32.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware architecturestudents build housingin West AlabamaTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.027b 1 .311.800 1 .371

1.011 1 .315.342 .185

1.025 1 .311

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 32.74.b.

Symmetric Measures

.045 .045 1.012 .312c

.045 .045 1.012 .312c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 39

40. The Low-Income Housing Program in West Alabama Should Be Continued.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

1.6% 8.1% 3.0%98.4% 91.9% 97.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should housing programbe continuedTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.138b 1 .0422.222 1 .1363.354 1 .067

.076 .076

4.112 1 .043

164

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.13.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.159 .097 -2.048 .042c

-.159 .097 -2.048 .042c

164

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 40

41. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Continuing Education Programs.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

32.6% 14.9% 29.1%

67.4% 85.1% 70.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburncontinuingeducation programsTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

12.345b 1 .00011.499 1 .00113.660 1 .000

.000 .000

12.320 1 .000

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.34.b.

Symmetric Measures

.156 .037 3.550 .000c

.156 .037 3.550 .000c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 41

42. I Have Participated in a Continuing Education Program Offered byAuburn University. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

89.0% 74.4% 85.5%

11.0% 25.6% 14.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Have taken anycontinuingeducation programsTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

11.243b 1 .00110.095 1 .00110.135 1 .001

.001 .001

11.211 1 .001

359

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.46.b.

Symmetric Measures

.177 .060 3.397 .001c

.177 .060 3.397 .001c

359

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 42

43. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Partnerships With Local Schools.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

67.9% 62.4% 66.8%

32.1% 37.6% 33.2%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburnpartnerships withlocal schoolsTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.113b 1 .292.877 1 .349

1.096 1 .295.291 .174

1.110 1 .292

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 33.53.b.

Symmetric Measures

.047 .045 1.054 .292c

.047 .045 1.054 .292c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 43

44. The School Partnerships Should Be Continued. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

.8% .6%99.2% 100.0% 99.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should partnershipsbe continuedTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.294b 1 .588

.000 1 1.000

.515 1 .4731.000 .774

.292 1 .589

168

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .23.b.

Symmetric Measures

.042 .021 .540 .590c

.042 .021 .540 .590c

168

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 44

45. My Local School District Would Benefit From a Partnership.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

14.8% 8.9% 13.6%

85.2% 91.1% 86.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Would local schooldistrict benefit frompartnershipTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.393b 1 .1221.918 1 .1662.610 1 .106

.145 .079

2.388 1 .122

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.77.b.

Symmetric Measures

.069 .039 1.547 .122c

.069 .039 1.547 .122c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 45

46. I Am Familiar With Auburn University's Cooperative Extension System.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

52.1% 23.8% 46.4%47.9% 76.2% 53.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Familiar with CooperativeExtension SystemTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

26.096b 1 .00024.970 1 .00027.404 1 .000

.000 .000

26.045 1 .000

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 46.91.b.

Symmetric Measures

.227 .040 5.235 .000c

.227 .040 5.235 .000c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 46

47. I Have Used Services Provided by the Auburn University ExtensionSystem. (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

57.2% 41.6% 52.8%42.8% 58.4% 47.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Used any services fromExtension SystemTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.422b 1 .0204.812 1 .0285.430 1 .020

.022 .014

5.402 1 .020

271

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 36.37.b.

Symmetric Measures

.141 .060 2.344 .020c

.141 .060 2.344 .020c

271

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 47

48. The Cooperative Extension Programs Are Beneficial.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

2.4% 1.6%97.6% 100.0% 98.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Are Extension programsbeneficialTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.102b 1 .294.092 1 .762

1.750 1 .186.540 .419

1.093 1 .296

128

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .70.b.

Symmetric Measures

.093 .033 1.046 .298c

.093 .033 1.046 .298c

128

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 48

49. Auburn University Should Offer More Distance Learning Programs.(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

11.6% 11.9% 11.7%88.4% 88.1% 88.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should Auburn offermore distance learningTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.006b 1 .938

.000 1 1.000

.006 1 .9381.000 .527

.006 1 .938

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.78.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.003 .045 -.077 .938c

-.003 .045 -.077 .938c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 49

50. Is Education an Important Issue? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

2.7% 3.0% 2.8%97.3% 97.0% 97.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is education animportant issueTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.019b 1 .889

.000 1 1.000

.019 1 .8901.000 .553

.019 1 .889

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.006 .046 -.139 .889c

-.006 .046 -.139 .889c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 50

51. Is Community and Economic Development an Important Issue?(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

4.9% 5.9% 5.1%

95.1% 94.1% 94.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is community andeconomic developmentan important issueTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.167b 1 .683

.024 1 .876

.161 1 .688.622 .420

.166 1 .683

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.19.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.018 .047 -.407 .684c

-.018 .047 -.407 .684c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 51

52. Is Agriculture an Important Issue? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

10.9% 7.9% 10.3%89.1% 92.1% 89.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is agriculture animportant issueTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.760b 1 .383

.474 1 .491

.804 1 .370.466 .251

.758 1 .384

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.38.b.

Symmetric Measures

.039 .041 .870 .384c

.039 .041 .870 .384c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 52

53. Are Family and Youth Important Issues? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

6.2% 6.9% 6.3%93.8% 93.1% 93.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is family and youth andimportant issueTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.078b 1 .780

.003 1 .959

.077 1 .782.819 .463

.078 1 .780

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.39.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.012 .046 -.279 .780c

-.012 .046 -.279 .780c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 53

54. Is the Environment an Important Issue? (by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

7.7% 6.9% 7.5%92.3% 93.1% 92.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the environmentan important issueTotal

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.061b 1 .805

.001 1 .971

.062 1 .8031.000 .500

.061 1 .805

506

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.58.b.

Symmetric Measures

.011 .043 .246 .805c

.011 .043 .246 .805c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 54

55. How Significant is It to Have Outreach Programs in Your Community?(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

4.9% 2.0% 4.3%4.9% 4.0% 4.7%6.7% 4.0% 6.1%2.2% 1.0% 2.0%

32.3% 36.6% 33.2%48.9% 52.5% 49.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How significantis it to haveoutreachprograms incommunity

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.035a 5 .5444.563 5 .471

2.679 1 .102

506

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.00.a.

Symmetric Measures

.073 .039 1.639 .102c

.053 .042 1.184 .237c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 55

56. How Significant is it to Have Access to Information Over the Internet?(by Alumni Status)

Crosstab

% within Have you, spouse, or kids attended Auburn

6.9% 5.0% 6.5%10.9% 7.9% 10.3%16.3% 9.9% 15.0%

1.7% 1.0% 1.6%21.7% 21.8% 21.7%42.5% 54.5% 44.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How Significantis it to accessinformation overthe Internet

Total

No Yes

Have you, spouse, orkids attended Auburn

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.228a 5 .2856.446 5 .265

5.054 1 .025

506

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (8.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.60.a.

Symmetric Measures

.100 .042 2.257 .024c

.104 .043 2.352 .019c

506

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix G: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Alumni StatusPage G - 56

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey ResponsesControlled by Race

1. How Familiar Are You With Auburn University? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

19.2% 10.4% 12.3%33.7% 24.3% 26.3%

1.3% 1.0%31.7% 36.6% 35.5%15.4% 27.4% 24.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Not at all familiarNot very familiarNeutralFamiliarVery familiar

How familiarare you withAuburn

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

14.517a 4 .00615.441 4 .004

12.803 1 .000

487

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.07.a.

Symmetric Measures

.162 .045 3.622 .000c

.161 .044 3.596 .000c

487

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 1

2. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Alabama?(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

.8% .6%6.8% 4.0% 4.6%1.9% .4%

48.5% 38.5% 40.7%42.7% 56.7% 53.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How importantis Auburn tothe quality oflife in Alabama

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

14.384a 4 .00613.842 4 .008

4.850 1 .028

477

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

5 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .43.a.

Symmetric Measures

.101 .047 2.211 .027c

.120 .046 2.633 .009c

477

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 2

3. How Important is Auburn University to the Quality of Life in Your LocalCommunity? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

3.3% 2.6%26.3% 16.1% 18.3%

1.0% 1.6% 1.5%45.5% 41.8% 42.6%27.3% 37.2% 35.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn to thequality of life inlocal community

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.252a 4 .03612.526 4 .014

2.292 1 .130

465

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.49.a.

Symmetric Measures

.070 .046 1.516 .130c

.084 .045 1.818 .070c

465

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 3

4. How Important is Auburn University Research for Jobs in Your LocalCommunity? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

2.1% 1.6%18.5% 9.7% 11.5%

1.8% 1.4%30.4% 43.1% 40.4%51.1% 43.4% 45.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UnimportantNot very importantNeutralImportantVery important

How important isAuburn researchfor jobs in localcommunity

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

12.197a 4 .01614.537 4 .006

.028 1 .868

433

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.27.a.

Symmetric Measures

.008 .051 .166 .868c

-.030 .050 -.622 .534c

433

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 4

5. Have You or Your Family Benefited from Auburn University?(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

76.0% 66.9% 68.9%24.0% 33.1% 31.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Have you or your familybenefited from AuburnTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.115b 1 .0782.708 1 .1003.228 1 .072

.094 .048

3.108 1 .078

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 32.39.b.

Symmetric Measures

.080 .043 1.767 .078c

.080 .043 1.767 .078c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 5

6. How Does Auburn University Funding Compare to Other Universitiesin the Southeast? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

15.0% 23.3% 21.3%48.8% 64.7% 60.9%36.3% 12.0% 17.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

LessAbout the sameMore

How does Auburnfunding compare toother universities inthe Southeast

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

24.716a 2 .00022.019 2 .000

16.511 1 .000

338

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.20.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.221 .057 -4.160 .000c

-.219 .057 -4.107 .000c

338

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 6

7. Auburn University Helps to Create Jobs in Alabama.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

1.0% 1.1% 1.1%13.1% 1.9% 4.2%

.3% .2%49.5% 46.5% 47.2%36.4% 50.3% 47.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn helpscreate jobs inAlabama

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

27.246a 4 .00022.167 4 .000

16.564 1 .000

475

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

5 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .21.a.

Symmetric Measures

.187 .052 4.139 .000c

.149 .047 3.279 .001c

475

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 7

8. Auburn University Graduates Play an Important Role in Your LocalCommunity. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

5.9% 1.9% 2.8%15.7% 4.4% 6.9%

1.0% 1.9% 1.7%43.1% 43.5% 43.4%34.3% 48.2% 45.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn graduatesplay importantroles in localcommunity

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

22.994a 4 .00019.942 4 .001

18.757 1 .000

465

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.75.a.

Symmetric Measures

.201 .052 4.416 .000c

.161 .048 3.518 .000c

465

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 8

9. Auburn University Concentrates on Athletics Rather Than AcademicPrograms (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

12.0% 17.6% 16.4%21.0% 33.1% 30.4%

4.0% 6.4% 5.9%35.0% 26.1% 28.0%28.0% 16.8% 19.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn concentrateson athletic instead ofacademic programs

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

13.355a 4 .01013.320 4 .010

11.597 1 .001

457

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.91.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.159 .046 -3.446 .001c

-.157 .046 -3.385 .001c

457

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 9

10. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the South.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

7.1% 2.4% 3.4%14.3% 6.2% 7.9%

1.0% 4.0% 3.4%40.8% 44.7% 43.9%36.7% 42.6% 41.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is one ofthe bestuniversities inthe South

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

14.472a 4 .00613.367 4 .010

8.051 1 .005

469

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.34.a.

Symmetric Measures

.131 .052 2.859 .004c

.089 .049 1.929 .054c

469

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 10

11. Auburn University is One of the Best Universities in the Nation.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

10.5% 7.3% 8.0%21.1% 11.8% 13.8%

1.1% 4.5% 3.8%34.7% 47.3% 44.7%32.6% 29.0% 29.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Auburn is oneof the bestuniversities inthe nation

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.941a 4 .02711.298 4 .023

2.135 1 .144

450

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.59.a.

Symmetric Measures

.069 .051 1.463 .144c

.034 .051 .722 .470c

450

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 11

12. Alabama Receives a Good Return on Its Investment from AuburnUniversity. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

1.1% .2%6.7% 3.2% 3.9%1.1% 1.7% 1.6%

51.1% 41.5% 43.5%40.0% 53.6% 50.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

State receives agood return on itsinvestment fromAuburn

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.394a 4 .0349.523 4 .049

7.251 1 .007

437

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .21.a.

Symmetric Measures

.129 .052 2.712 .007c

.118 .048 2.475 .014c

437

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 12

13. The Quality of Higher Education in Alabama Affects Me. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

5.9% 3.2% 3.8%6.9% 4.8% 5.2%

1.9% 1.5%32.7% 29.3% 30.0%54.5% 60.9% 59.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeNeutralSomewhat agreeStrongly agree

Quality of highereducation inAlabama affectsme

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.039a 4 .2836.279 4 .179

2.266 1 .132

477

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.48.a.

Symmetric Measures

.069 .050 1.507 .132c

.059 .047 1.292 .197c

477

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 13

14. I Learn About Alabama Universities from Newspapers. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

44.2% 33.1% 35.5%

55.8% 66.9% 64.5%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromnewspapersTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.452b 1 .0353.978 1 .0464.356 1 .037

.038 .024

4.443 1 .035

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 36.87.b.

Symmetric Measures

.096 .047 2.115 .035c

.096 .047 2.115 .035c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 14

15. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Radio. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

72.1% 71.1% 71.3%27.9% 28.9% 28.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from radioTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.042b 1 .838

.007 1 .935

.042 1 .838.903 .471

.042 1 .838

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.84.b.

Symmetric Measures

.009 .045 .204 .839c

.009 .045 .204 .839c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 15

16. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Magazines. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

61.5% 70.6% 68.6%

38.5% 29.4% 31.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities frommagazinesTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.104b 1 .0782.698 1 .1003.025 1 .082

.095 .052

3.097 1 .078

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 32.61.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.080 .047 -1.764 .078c

-.080 .047 -1.764 .078c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 16

17. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Television. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

49.0% 41.7% 43.2%51.0% 58.3% 56.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from T.V.Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.812b 1 .1781.524 1 .2171.801 1 .180

.183 .109

1.808 1 .179

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 44.97.b.

Symmetric Measures

.061 .046 1.346 .179c

.061 .046 1.346 .179c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 17

18. I Learn About Alabama Universities From the Internet. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

67.3% 65.9% 66.2%

32.7% 34.1% 33.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromthe InternetTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.074b 1 .786

.024 1 .877

.074 1 .785.816 .441

.074 1 .786

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35.16.b.

Symmetric Measures

.012 .045 .271 .786c

.012 .045 .271 .786c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 18

19. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Alumni. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

76.0% 64.3% 66.8%24.0% 35.7% 33.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from alumniTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.999b 1 .0254.488 1 .0345.212 1 .022

.026 .016

4.988 1 .026

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 34.52.b.

Symmetric Measures

.101 .042 2.243 .025c

.101 .042 2.243 .025c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 19

20. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Students. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

63.5% 63.3% 63.3%36.5% 36.7% 36.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from studentsTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.001b 1 .973

.000 1 1.000

.001 1 .9731.000 .535

.001 1 .973

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 38.15.b.

Symmetric Measures

.002 .045 .034 .973c

.002 .045 .034 .973c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 20

21. I Learn About Alabama Universities From My Co-workers. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

71.2% 69.5% 69.9%

28.8% 30.5% 30.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Learn about Stateuniversities fromco-workersTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.102b 1 .749

.040 1 .842

.103 1 .748.810 .424

.102 1 .749

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 31.33.b.

Symmetric Measures

.014 .045 .319 .750c

.014 .045 .319 .750c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 21

22. I Learn About Alabama Universities From Other Sources. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

86.5% 83.3% 84.0%13.5% 16.7% 16.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Learn about Stateuniversities from otherTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.626b 1 .429

.410 1 .522

.647 1 .421.546 .265

.625 1 .429

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.62.b.

Symmetric Measures

.036 .043 .790 .430c

.036 .043 .790 .430c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 22

23. I Saw a Television Announcement About Auburn University Research.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

63.5% 47.9% 51.2%

36.5% 52.1% 48.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Seen any T.V.announcements aboutAuburn researchTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.915b 1 .0057.305 1 .0078.004 1 .005

.006 .003

7.899 1 .005

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 50.72.b.

Symmetric Measures

.127 .044 2.831 .005c

.127 .044 2.831 .005c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 23

24. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed A New Bulletproof Vest.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

82.7% 73.4% 75.4%17.3% 26.6% 24.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn developednew bulletproof vestTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.780b 1 .0523.297 1 .0694.005 1 .045

.055 .032

3.772 1 .052

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 25.57.b.

Symmetric Measures

.088 .041 1.948 .052c

.088 .041 1.948 .052c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 24

25. The Bulletproof Vest Research is Significant. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

2.0% 1.7%100.0% 98.0% 98.3%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the bulletproof vestresearch significantTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.359b 1 .549

.000 1 1.000

.656 1 .4181.000 .721

.356 1 .551

120

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .30.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.055 .020 -.595 .553c

-.055 .020 -.595 .553c

120

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 25

26. I Saw a Television Announcement About the Bulletproof Vest.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

55.6% 57.8% 57.5%44.4% 42.2% 42.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout bulletproof vestTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.033b 1 .856

.000 1 1.000

.033 1 .8571.000 .527

.032 1 .857

120

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.65.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.017 .092 -.180 .858c

-.017 .092 -.180 .858c

120

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 26

27. The Bulletproof Vest Announcement Should Be Continued.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

7.0% 5.9%

100.0% 93.0% 94.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should bulletproofvest announcementbe continuedTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.593b 1 .441

.000 1 1.0001.058 1 .304

1.000 .593

.581 1 .446

51

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .47.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.108 .036 -.759 .451c

-.108 .036 -.759 .451c

51

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 27

28. I Am Aware That Auburn University Developed New Airbags.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

82.7% 78.4% 79.3%17.3% 21.6% 20.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburndeveloped new airbagsTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.925b 1 .336

.681 1 .409

.955 1 .328.413 .206

.923 1 .337

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.52.b.

Symmetric Measures

.044 .043 .961 .337c

.044 .043 .961 .337c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 28

29. The Airbag Research is Significant. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

11.1% 2.0%88.9% 100.0% 98.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the airbag researchsignificantTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

9.409b 1 .0024.555 1 .0337.090 1 .008

.030 .030

9.315 1 .002

101

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .36.b.

Symmetric Measures

.305 .104 3.189 .002c

.305 .104 3.189 .002c

101

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 29

30. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's AirbagResearch.

(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

77.8% 55.4% 59.4%22.2% 44.6% 40.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout airbagsTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.066b 1 .0802.209 1 .1373.266 1 .071

.112 .066

3.035 1 .081

101

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.31.b.

Symmetric Measures

.174 .088 1.760 .081c

.174 .088 1.760 .081c

101

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 30

31. The Airbag Announcement Should Be Continued. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

8.1% 7.3%

100.0% 91.9% 92.7%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should airbagannouncementbe continuedTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.350b 1 .554

.000 1 1.000

.641 1 .4231.000 .729

.341 1 .559

41

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

3 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .29.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.092 .035 -.579 .566c

-.092 .035 -.579 .566c

41

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 31

32. I Am Aware That Auburn University Impacts the Economy. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

51.9% 31.5% 35.9%48.1% 68.5% 64.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn impactsthe economyTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

14.825b 1 .00013.951 1 .00014.370 1 .000

.000 .000

14.795 1 .000

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 37.30.b.

Symmetric Measures

.174 .047 3.902 .000c

.174 .047 3.902 .000c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 32

33. I Saw the Television Announcement About Auburn University's Impacts.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

62.0% 57.4% 58.1%38.0% 42.6% 41.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Seen T.V. announcementabout the impactsTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.363b 1 .547

.199 1 .656

.366 1 .545.640 .330

.362 1 .547

313

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.93.b.

Symmetric Measures

.034 .056 .601 .548c

.034 .056 .601 .548c

313

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 33

34. The Impact Announcement Should Be Continued. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

2.7% 2.3%

100.0% 97.3% 97.7%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Should impactannouncementbe continuedTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.521b 1 .470

.000 1 1.000

.952 1 .3291.000 .622

.517 1 .472

131

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .44.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.063 .020 -.718 .474c

-.063 .020 -.718 .474c

131

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 34

35. I Am Aware That Auburn University Improves Highway Construction.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

71.2% 62.0% 63.9%28.8% 38.0% 36.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn improvedhighway constructionTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.987b 1 .0842.603 1 .1073.064 1 .080

.086 .052

2.981 1 .084

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 37.51.b.

Symmetric Measures

.078 .043 1.730 .084c

.078 .043 1.730 .084c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 35

36. The Highway Construction Research is Significant. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

3.3% 2.1% 2.3%

96.7% 97.9% 97.7%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is the highwayconstructionresearch significantTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.183b 1 .669

.000 1 1.000

.165 1 .684.530 .530

.182 1 .670

176

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .68.b.

Symmetric Measures

.032 .087 .426 .671c

.032 .087 .426 .671c

176

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 36

37. I Am Aware That Auburn University Fisheries Sustains One of the World's Leading Food Sources. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

53.8% 35.9% 39.8%46.2% 64.1% 60.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Aware Auburn fisheriessustains food sourcesTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

10.959b 1 .00110.224 1 .00110.767 1 .001

.001 .001

10.936 1 .001

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 41.34.b.

Symmetric Measures

.150 .046 3.341 .001c

.150 .046 3.341 .001c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 37

38. The Fisheries Research is Significant. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

2.1% 1.6% 1.7%97.9% 98.4% 98.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the fisheries researchsignificantTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.050b 1 .823

.000 1 1.000

.048 1 .827.593 .593

.050 1 .823

294

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .82.b.

Symmetric Measures

.013 .063 .223 .823c

.013 .063 .223 .823c

294

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 38

39. I Am Aware That Auburn University Architecture Students BuildLow-Income Housing in West Alabama. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

66.3% 68.8% 68.2%

33.7% 31.3% 31.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware architecturestudents build housingin West AlabamaTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.218b 1 .640

.121 1 .728

.217 1 .642.637 .361

.218 1 .641

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 33.03.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.021 .046 -.466 .641c

-.021 .046 -.466 .641c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 39

40. The Low-Income Housing Program in West Alabama Should Be Continued.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

4.2% 3.2%100.0% 95.8% 96.8%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should housing programbe continuedTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.507b 1 .220.468 1 .494

2.608 1 .106.588 .273

1.497 1 .221

155

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.13.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.099 .023 -1.226 .222c

-.099 .023 -1.226 .222c

155

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 40

41. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Continuing Education Programs.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

37.5% 26.6% 28.9%

62.5% 73.4% 71.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburncontinuingeducation programsTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.765b 1 .0294.248 1 .0394.598 1 .032

.038 .021

4.755 1 .029

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 30.05.b.

Symmetric Measures

.099 .047 2.189 .029c

.099 .047 2.189 .029c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 41

42. I Have Participated in a Continuing Education Program Offered byAuburn University. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

87.7% 84.8% 85.3%

12.3% 15.2% 14.7%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Have taken anycontinuingeducation programsTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.364b 1 .546

.168 1 .682

.378 1 .539.698 .350

.363 1 .547

347

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.55.b.

Symmetric Measures

.032 .051 .602 .547c

.032 .051 .602 .547c

347

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 42

43. I Am Aware of Auburn University's Partnerships With Local Schools.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

69.2% 65.9% 66.6%

30.8% 34.1% 33.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Aware of Auburnpartnerships withlocal schoolsTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.412b 1 .521

.275 1 .600

.416 1 .519.559 .302

.411 1 .522

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 34.74.b.

Symmetric Measures

.029 .045 .641 .522c

.029 .045 .641 .522c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 43

44. The School Partnerships Should Be Continued. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

.8% .6%100.0% 99.2% 99.4%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should partnershipsbe continuedTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.246b 1 .620

.000 1 1.000

.439 1 .5081.000 .804

.244 1 .621

163

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .20.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.039 .020 -.493 .623c

-.039 .020 -.493 .623c

163

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 44

45. My Local School District Would Benefit From a Partnership.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

22.1% 11.7% 13.9%

77.9% 88.3% 86.1%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Would local schooldistrict benefit frompartnershipTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.376b 1 .0076.534 1 .0116.715 1 .010

.010 .007

7.361 1 .007

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.49.b.

Symmetric Measures

.123 .051 2.731 .007c

.123 .051 2.731 .007c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 45

46. I Am Familiar With Auburn University's Cooperative Extension System.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

55.8% 43.5% 46.1%44.2% 56.5% 53.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Familiar with CooperativeExtension SystemTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.966b 1 .0264.484 1 .0344.955 1 .026

.027 .017

4.956 1 .026

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 47.95.b.

Symmetric Measures

.101 .045 2.235 .026c

.101 .045 2.235 .026c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 46

47. I Have Used Services Provided by the Auburn University ExtensionSystem. (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

58.7% 51.2% 52.5%41.3% 48.8% 47.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Used any services fromExtension SystemTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.866b 1 .352

.590 1 .442

.871 1 .351.417 .222

.863 1 .353

263

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.86.b.

Symmetric Measures

.057 .061 .929 .354c

.057 .061 .929 .354c

263

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 47

48. The Cooperative Extension Programs Are Beneficial.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

5.3% .9% 1.6%94.7% 99.1% 98.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Are Extension programsbeneficialTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.910b 1 .167.151 1 .697

1.356 1 .244.282 .282

1.894 1 .169

125

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .30.b.

Symmetric Measures

.124 .130 1.381 .170c

.124 .130 1.381 .170c

125

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 48

49. Auburn University Should Offer More Distance Learning Programs.(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

9.6% 11.2% 10.9%90.4% 88.8% 89.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Should Auburn offermore distance learningTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.212b 1 .645

.080 1 .778

.217 1 .641.725 .399

.211 1 .646

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.30.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.021 .044 -.459 .646c

-.021 .044 -.459 .646c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 49

50. Is Education an Important Issue? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

2.9% 2.6% 2.7%97.1% 97.4% 97.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is education animportant issueTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.025b 1 .875

.000 1 1.000

.024 1 .8761.000 .548

.025 1 .875

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.77.b.

Symmetric Measures

.007 .047 .157 .875c

.007 .047 .157 .875c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 50

51. Is Community and Economic Development an Important Issue?(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

5.8% 4.9% 5.1%

94.2% 95.1% 94.9%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

Is community andeconomic developmentan important issueTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.114b 1 .736

.007 1 .931

.110 1 .740.802 .448

.113 1 .736

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.33.b.

Symmetric Measures

.015 .047 .336 .737c

.015 .047 .336 .737c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 51

52. Is Agriculture an Important Issue? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

11.5% 9.1% 9.6%88.5% 90.9% 90.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is agriculture animportant issueTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.552b 1 .457

.309 1 .578

.531 1 .466.456 .282

.551 1 .458

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.02.b.

Symmetric Measures

.034 .048 .742 .458c

.034 .048 .742 .458c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 52

53. Are Family and Youth Important Issues? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

5.8% 6.0% 5.9%94.2% 94.0% 94.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is family and youth andimportant issueTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.007b 1 .933

.000 1 1.000

.007 1 .9331.000 .575

.007 1 .933

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.18.b.

Symmetric Measures

-.004 .045 -.084 .933c

-.004 .045 -.084 .933c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 53

54. Is the Environment an Important Issue? (by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

9.6% 6.8% 7.4%90.4% 93.2% 92.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

NoYes

Is the environmentan important issueTotal

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.969b 1 .325

.598 1 .440

.913 1 .339.396 .216

.967 1 .325

488

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.67.b.

Symmetric Measures

.045 .049 .983 .326c

.045 .049 .983 .326c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 54

55. How Significant is It to Have Outreach Programs in Your Community?(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

7.7% 3.4% 4.3%4.8% 4.4% 4.5%4.8% 6.3% 5.9%1.9% 1.0% 1.2%

26.9% 35.7% 33.8%53.8% 49.2% 50.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How significantis it to haveoutreachprograms incommunity

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

6.561a 5 .2556.148 5 .292

.611 1 .434

488

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.28.a.

Symmetric Measures

.035 .050 .781 .435c

-.010 .047 -.229 .819c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 55

56. How Significant is it to Have Access to Information Over the Internet?(by Race)

Crosstab

% within Race by Category

11.5% 4.9% 6.4%5.8% 10.9% 9.8%

14.4% 15.1% 15.0%1.8% 1.4%

14.4% 23.7% 21.7%53.8% 43.5% 45.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No opinionVery insignificantInsignificantNeutralSignificantVery significant

How Significantis it to accessinformation overthe Internet

Total

AfricianAmerican White

Race by Category

Total

Chi-Square Tests

14.901a 5 .01116.136 5 .006

.021 1 .885

488

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

1 cells (8.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.49.a.

Symmetric Measures

-.007 .048 -.145 .885c

-.043 .048 -.944 .345c

488

Pearson's RInterval by IntervalSpearman CorrelationOrdinal by Ordinal

N of Valid Cases

ValueAsymp.

Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Based on normal approximation.c.

Appendix H: 2001 AU Image Survey Results by Race CategoryPage H - 56