Attribution Theory

16
ATTRIBUTION THEORY Beliefs about Causes and Control

description

This is a presentation on beliefs, self-schemas, and attribution theory.

Transcript of Attribution Theory

Page 1: Attribution Theory

ATTRIBUTION THEORYBeliefs about Causes and Control

Page 2: Attribution Theory

Beliefs and Self-Schemas

• What do students believe about themselves – their competence and the causes for success or failure?

• Let us start with a basic question: “What do they believe about ability?”

Page 3: Attribution Theory

Beliefs and Self-Schemas

Entity view of ability

• Belief that ability is a fixed characteristic that cannot be changed

Incremental view of ability

• Belief that ability is a set of skills that can be changed

Page 4: Attribution Theory

Attribution Theories of Motivation

• Describe how the individual’s explanations, justifications, and excuses about self or others influence motivation.

• According to Bernard Weiner, most of the attributed causes for successes or failures can be characterized in terms of 3 dimensions:

1. locus (location of the cause –internal or external to the person)

2. stability (whether the cause is likely to stay the same in the near future or can change), and

3. controllability (whether the person can control the cause).

Page 5: Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory• Every cause for success or failure can be

categorized on these 3 dimensions (locus, stability, controllability).

• For example, luck is external (locus), unstable (stability), and uncontrollable (controllability).

• Ability is usually considered stable and uncontrollable, but incremental theorists would argue that ability is unstable and controllable.

Page 6: Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

• Feeling in control of your own learning seems to be related to choosing more difficult academic tasks, putting out more effort, using better strategies, and persisting longer in schoolwork (Scunk, 2000; Weiner, 1994a, 1994b).

Page 7: Attribution Theory

Attributions in the Classroom

• When usually successful students fail, they often make internal, controllable attributions: They misunderstood the directions, lacked the necessary knowledge, or simply did not study hard enough.

• As a consequence, they usually focus on strategies for succeeding next time.

• This often leads to achievement, pride, and a greater feeling of control (Ames, 1992; Stipek, 2002).

Page 8: Attribution Theory

Attributions in the Classroom

• The greatest motivational problems arise when students attribute failures to stable, uncontrollable causes.

• Such students may seem resigned to failure, depressed, helpless--- unmotivated (Weiner, 2000).

Page 9: Attribution Theory

Beliefs about Self-Efficacy and Learned Helplessness

• Self-efficacy is our belief about our personal competence or effectiveness in a given area.

• Bandura (1997) defines self-efficacy as “beliefs in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” (p.3).

Page 10: Attribution Theory

Self-Efficacy & Attributions

• Self-efficacy and attributions affect each other.

• If success is attributed to internal or controllable causes such as ability or effort, then self-efficacy is enhanced.

• But if success is attributed to luck or to the intervention of others, then self-efficacy may not be strengthened.

Page 11: Attribution Theory

Learned Helplessness

• When people come to believe that the events and outcomes in their lives are mostly uncontrollable, they have developed learned helplessness (Seligman, 1975).

• Learned Helplessness appears to cause 3 types of deficits: motivational, cognitive, and affective.

• Students who feel hopeless will be unmotivated and reluctant to attempt work.

• Because they become pessimistic about learning, they miss practice to improve skills and abilities, so they develop cognitive deficits.

Page 12: Attribution Theory

Beliefs about Self-Worth

• Covington and his colleagues suggest that attributions and beliefs about ability, self-efficacy, and self-worth come together in 3 kinds of motivational sets:

1. Mastery-oriented students

2. Failure-Avoiding Students

3. Failure-Accepting Students

Page 13: Attribution Theory

(Source: From Educational Psychology Figure, p.430 by A. Woolfolk, 2008)

Page 14: Attribution Theory

Beliefs about Self-Worth

(Woolfolk, 2008) Teachers may be able to prevent some failure-avoiding

students from becoming failure accepting by helping them to find new and more realistic goals.

Some students may need support in aspiring to higher levels in the face of sexual or ethnic stereotypes about what they should want or what they should not be able to do well.

Instead of pitying or excusing these students, teachers can teach them how to learn and then hold them accountable.

This will help the students develop sense of self-efficacy for learning and avoid learned helplessness.

Page 15: Attribution Theory

(Source: From Educational Psychology Figure, p.432 by A. Woolfolk, 2008)

Page 16: Attribution Theory

Reflect:

How do beliefs about ability affect motivation?

What are the 3 dimensions of attributions in Weiner’s theory? Explain.

What is self-efficacy and how does it relate to learned helplessness?

What can we do to help students develop their sense of self-efficacy?