Attitudes and Perceptions of Fishers towards the 25-year old Seasonal Closed Measure in Phang-Nga &...
-
Upload
alexander-bruce -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Attitudes and Perceptions of Fishers towards the 25-year old Seasonal Closed Measure in Phang-Nga &...
Attitudes and Perceptions of Fishers towards
the 25-year old Seasonal Closed Measure in Phang-Nga & Krabi Bays, Thailand
by
Ms. Sampan Panjarat
ST109098
NRM, AIT16th May, 2011
2
Content
1. Introduction & Objectives
2. Method
3. Result
4. Conclusion
5. Recommendation
Abbreviations
A&P Attitude and PerceptionASCT Andaman Sea Coast of ThailandIUU Illegal Unregulated Unreported FisheriesLSF Large-Scale Fisheries
PB Phang-Nga BayKB Krabi BaySCM Seasonal Closed MeasureSSF Small-Scale Fisheries
3
Introduction
4
What are attitude and perception?
Attitude: a complex mental state involving beliefs,
feelings, values and dispositions to act in certain ways
Perception: cognition, believe, opinion, understanding
the synonym of awareness, sense and recognition
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Collins English Dictionary- Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition.
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P4
5
blog.self-improvement-saga.com
Attitudes: influence behaviors (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975).
Perception: affects the decision making (The American Heritage®
Dictionary of the English Language (4th Edition).
Why important?
“Attitude is a little thing that
make a big difference”
--Winston Churchill--
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
6
Attitude & Perception towards Fishery Management
fishers’ perception will influence fishers’ attitude towards compliance or non-compliance behaviors (Raakjaer & Neilsen, 2003)
short term: extreme enforcement
long term: sincerely comply of resource users (Raakjaer & Neilsen, 2003)
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P6
7
Seasonal Closed Measure (SCM)
Thailand
Trang
Phang-Nga
Krabi
Phuket
The 1985 SCM The 2007 SCM
2 months
15 Apr-15Jun
3 months
1 Apr-30Jun
Prohibited: trawlers, purse seiners, gill nets (Ø < 4.7 cm)
Exempted: day-anchovy purse seiners (PB),
nets operating to weir or fence
PB
KB
KB
8
Emphasize ecological aspect rather than social aspect Illegal fishing: enforcement is expensive
Year No. of incident budget (mil USD) IUU budget (m USD)
2006 100 8.5 0
2007 129 8.5 0
2008 88 8.5 10
2009 72 9.5 10Source: (DOF, 2010)
In reality: Illegal fishing incidents suppose to be higher (2.5 mil USD/year)
The overexploitation (pelagic fish 333%, demersal fish 200%) (TDRI, 1995)
High expectation for compliance: spawning & nursing season
SCM & Research Gaps
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
9
Objectives
Knowledge of fishers about the SCM
Participation of fishers in the SCM
A&P (agreeing, impact, satisfaction, behaviors & opinion)
Examine: how can the research finding be integrated to facilitate the effectiveness of the SCM
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P9
10
Method
11
PB (49)
SSF= 22 samples
Bann Klong Kein
Bann Koh Yao, Phang Nga
LSF=27 samples
Bann Koh Sire , PhuketKB (51)
SSF=41 samples
Bo Muang, Krabi
Kao Kramm, Krabi
Dann , Trang
Tasae, Trang
Koa Kiam, Trang
Modtanoy, Trang
LSF=10 samples
Bann Si Thai, Krabi
Thailand
Trang
Phang-Nga
Krabi
Phuket
The 1985 SCM The 2007 SCM
PB
KB
KB
Structure questionnaire validity, reliability (Cronbach’s α 0.6-0.8)
Face to face interview
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P11
AFRDEC nd AFRDEC nd
AFRDEC, nd
Result
13
Knowledge & understanding of fishers on the SCM
SAMPAN Dec 2010
SAMPAN Dec 2010
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
14
PB &KB: low knowledge & understanding on the SCM
KB: lower knowledge on the exempted gear
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
15
Participation in the SCM
SAMPAN Dec 2010 SAMPAN Dec 2010
16
Most of fishers lack of participation especially, fishers in KB
PB & KB: accepted that if fish amount increase it will be available for all fishers to share
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation A&PResult: Knowledge Participation A&P
17
SAMPAN Dec 2010
A & PSAMPAN Nov 2010
18
KB: disagreed with the time of restriction KB: stated neutral on the Exempted gear PB & KB fishers disagreed with performance of patrol officers
d0 not monitor & observe, when demanded by fishers can not handle the violators do not have a fair evenhanded treatment for all fishers believed that corruption was existent
Agreement
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
www.fisheries.go.th
19
PB: SCM negatively impact on conflict
PB: disagreed with the increasing sizes of fish
PB & KB: agreed with the increasing amount of fish
Perception on Impact
SAMPAN, Dec2010
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
20
Satisfied: 74%
Dissatisfied: 26%
Satisfaction
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
21
Some fishers opposed the amendment A few fishers fished illegally Fishers distrusted fishers from outside their communities Fishers did not call patrol: distrusted, do not want to face
difficulties
Behavioral Attributes
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
22
Fishers agreed on the existence of the SCM it still needs improvement e.g. area & time,
regulation after the closed season
Opinion
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
23
Conclusion
most fishers had low knowledge on the SCM: standard knowledge did not reach fishers
fishers lacked participation in most activities especially in KB: inappropriate mechanisms of participation
some fishers disagreed 0r opposed the SCM
(time & area)
a few fishers persist to brake the SCM
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P23
24
Conclusion
disagreed with performance of patrol
distrust patrol officers: did not call patrol
distrusted outside fishers
satisfied: 74%, dissatisfied: 26%
the SCM still requires an improvement
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P24
25
Enhance standard knowledge transfer: social network participation & involvement
Enhance full participation: appropriate mechanisms & concern social
characteristics : meeting & discussion in local level, network, association
Assess the SCM time & areas of restriction exempted gear scientific & traditional knowledge, local
involvement building of trust and commitment
Recommendation
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
26
Examine performance of patrol officers Build trust: information sharing, save cost Conflict management
Recommendation
for further study
More contribution of the social science research in fisheries management
Method Method conclusionconclusionIntro. & objectivesIntro. & objectives Recommend.Recommend.Result: Knowledge Participation, A&PResult: Knowledge Participation, A&P
27
acknowledgement
All fishers who participated in this study Local agencies in Phuket, Phang-Nga,
Krabi & Trang Prof. Ganesh P. Shivakoti, Dr. Roland
Cochard & Dr. Theo W. Ebbers Ramya Tajagopalan The Ministry of Agriculture and
Cooperatives (MOAC), Thailand
28
References
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Collins English Dictionary- Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition.
DOF. (2010). The statistic of the illegal fishing incidents. Retrieve April 20, 2010, from http://www.fisheries.go.th/management/marine-admin/index.htm
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley cooperatives. Human Organization, 52 (4), 356–367.
Raakjaer, J. and Neilsen, R. (2003). An analytical framework for studying: compliance and legitimacy in fisheries management. Marine Policy, 27, 425-432.
TDRI. (1995). Natural Resources Management in Mainland Southeast Asia. 36 p.
Thomson, B. D. (n.d.). Post-Tsunami Rehabilitation of Small-Scale Fisheries: Experiences from Thailand: 19 pp.
29 Thank You