Attachments for MA CED grant, FROED, Fall River

Attachment No. 2

FORM C

General Terms and Conditions

Commonwealth Wind Incentive Program: Community Scale Solicitation No. 2010-CWIPCS-02

Form C


Please Note: Exceptions to the following document must be included in the Application. If Applicant has no exceptions, please submit a fully-executed original of the General Terms and Conditions with the Application.

Massachusetts Clean Energy Center


The following General Terms and Conditions are issued by the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MassCEC), an independent public instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Any changes or electronic alterations to the official version of this form shall be void. Participants shall be bound by these General Terms and Conditions upon execution and submission to MassCEC. These General Terms and Conditions will be incorporated by reference into any Task Order for any financial assistance award executed by the Participant and MassCEC.

1. Definitions

"Agreement" means these General Terms and Conditions and all Task Orders entered into hereunder and all other referenced attachments hereto and thereto, as the same may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms of these General Terms and Conditions.

"Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (and its political subdivisions or agents where the context so requires).

”Deliverable” means any tangible product to be delivered as an element of performance under a Task Order.

“Grant” means the funding awarded by MassCEC’s Board of Directors as set forth in the applicable Task Order.

“General Counsel" means MassCEC's General Counsel, or, in the event that no Person holds such title at the time in question, such other legal counsel to MassCEC as MassCEC's Executive Director may designate.

"Governmental Authority" means any national or federal government, any state or other political subdivision thereof, and any other Person exercising executive, legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative functions of or pertaining to government.

“Participant” means any Person who has sought funding or other financial support from, or has submitted one or more proposals for projects to, MassCEC and has been awarded such financial support or funding under any of MassCEC's programs or initiatives as in effect from time to time.

“Project” means services rendered, obligations due, costs incurred, commodities and deliverables provided and accepted by the MassCEC, programs provided or other commitments authorized under a Task Order.

“Project Manager” means the individual, set forth in the applicable Task Order, employed by MassCEC and by Participant, respectively who shall have primary responsibility for managing the Project.

“Project Budget” means the and costs associated with the tasks set forth in the Project Plan which shall be reimbursed by MassCEC pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable Task Order.


“Project Plan” means the set of tasks required to complete the Project as set forth in the applicable Task Order.

"Public Records Act" means the Massachusetts Public Records Act, M.G.L. Chapter 66, and any successor thereto.

“Task Order” means the documentation that sets forth the Grant awarded, the specifics of the Project for which the Grant was awarded and all terms and conditions for the application and use of such Grant funds, including the Project Plan and Budget.

2. Term and Termination

a) The effective start date of performance under a Task Order shall be the date such Task Order has been executed by an authorized signatory of the Contractor and MassCEC.

b) This Agreement may be terminated by either CEC or Participant at any time for a material breach of any term of the Agreement. In the event of such termination, compensation shall be paid to the Participant for the actual costs of allowable expenses incurred for work performed and the reasonable and necessary actual direct costs incurred in the performance of the work pursuant to the applicable Task Order prior to the effective date of the termination.

c) MassCEC may terminate this Agreement in the event of loss of availability of sufficient funds for the purposes of this Agreement or in the event of an unforeseen public emergency or other change of law mandating immediate MassCEC action inconsistent with performing its obligations under this Agreement.

3. Payments and Compensation

The Participant shall only be compensated for performance delivered and accepted by the MassCEC in accordance with the specific terms and conditions of the applicable Task Order. Acceptance by the Participant of any payment or partial payment, without any written objection by the Participant, shall in each instance operate as a release and discharge of MassCEC from all claims, liabilities or other obligations relating to the performance of a Task Order.

4. Insurance

a) Specific requirements for insurance shall be set forth in the applicable Task Order.

b) Insurance Requirements for Public Agencies. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision of this Section 4, in the event the Participant is a public agency (as defined in Chapter 7, Section 39A of the Massachusetts General Laws), then MassCEC agrees that Participant may self insure to the extent permitted by law as though Participant were the insurer under all insurance required for its activities under the applicable Task Order. Participant hereby waives all offsets and defenses that it may otherwise have with respect to the insurance required to be maintained hereunder. The grant of the right to self insure is subject to the requirements that (i) the contractors and subcontractors of Participant carry insurance of the types and levels required for their activities under the applicable Task Order; (ii) that such insurance shall name MassCEC, and such other entities as MassCEC may request, as additional insureds, and (iii) no settlement or payment, for any claim or loss, injury or damage or other matter as to which MassCEC may be charged with an obligation to make any payment or reimbursement, shall be made by the Participant without the written approval of MassCEC

5. Access and Use

Participant agrees to license or otherwise make available to MassCEC in perpetuity, without charge, all materials prepared and produced for the Project, including, without limitation, all plans, specifications and analyses developed in connection with the Project for MassCEC’s use and dissemination.


Page 2


6. Publicity

a) The Participant shall collaborate with MassCEC on any press releases, events, signs and to plan for any news conference concerning the Project. In any media produced by Participant, Participant will not represent that positions taken or advanced by it represent the opinion or position of MassCEC.

b) The Participant agrees that MassCEC shall have the right to make use of and disseminate, in whole or in part, all work products, reports, and other information produced in the course of the Project, and to use the information therein contained to produce summaries, case studies or similar information resources.

7. Assignment and Subcontracting

MassCEC may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any natural or legal person or entity who succeeds to all or any portion of MassCEC's business, and all covenants and agreements hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by said successors or assigns. Participant shall not assign or in any way transfer any interest in, or any of Participant's rights or obligations under this Agreement, including by operation of law, without the prior written consent of MassCEC, nor shall Participant subcontract any services to anyone without the prior written consent of MassCEC.

8. Nondiscrimination

The Participant agrees to comply with all applicable Federal and State statutes, rules and regulations promoting fair employment practices or prohibiting employment discrimination and unfair labor practices and shall not discriminate in the hiring of any applicant for employment nor shall any qualified employee be demoted, discharged or otherwise subject to discrimination in the tenure, position, promotional opportunities, wages benefits or terms and conditions of their employment because of race, color, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, religion, disability, handicap, sexual orientation, or for exercising any rights afforded by law.

9. Indemnification

a) To the fullest extent permitted by law, Participant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Commonwealth, MassCEC, and each of their respective agents, officers, directors and employees (together with the Commonwealth and MassCEC, the "Covered Persons") from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, damages, fines, penalties, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees), judgments and awards (collectively, "Damages") sustained, incurred or suffered by or imposed upon any Covered Person resulting from (i) any breach of this Agreement or false representation of Participant under this Agreement, or (ii) any negligent acts or omissions or reckless misconduct of Participant. Without limiting the foregoing, Participant shall indemnify and hold harmless each Covered Person against any and all Damages that may arise out of or are imposed because of the failure to comply with the provisions of applicable law by Participant or any of its agents, officers, directors, employees or subcontractors. The foregoing notwithstanding, Participant shall not be liable for (i) any Damages sustained, incurred or suffered by or imposed upon any Covered Person resulting from any negligent acts or omissions or reckless misconduct of MassCEC, and (ii) except for liability for death or personal injury caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the Participant or for claims of infringement of a third party’s intellectual property by Participant, the aggregate liability of Participant under this Agreement shall not exceed the greater of the amount of the Grant or the amount recovered under any applicable insurance coverage.

b) In no event shall either party be liable for any indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages whatsoever (including but not limited to lost profits or interruption of business) arising out of or related to Participant’s performance of the Project under this Agreement.


Page 3


10. Public Records

As a public entity, the MassCEC is subject to Massachusetts’ Public Records Law, codified at Chapter 66 of the Massachusetts General Laws. Thus, except for those documents exempted from disclosure, any documentary material, data, or other information received by the MassCEC from an Applicant is a public record subject to disclosure. Applicants are advised to review Chapter 66 prior to submitting any information to the MassCEC.

Nothwithstanding the above, certain kinds of information may be statutorily exempt from public disclosure under the limited exemption at Chapter 23J, Section 2(k) of the Massachusetts General Laws. Specifically, materials that fall under one of the following categories may be determined to be not public records and thus not subject to disclosure:

1. Information, documents, or data that consist of trade secrets;

2. Information, documents, or data that consist of commercial or financial information regarding the operation of any business conducted by the Applicant; and

3. Information, documents, or data regarding the Applicant’s competitive position in a particular field of endeavor.

An Applicant may assert a claim of confidentiality for part or all of the information submitted to the MassCEC. To make a claim of confidentiality, an Applicant must:

1. Clearly identify the documents, reports, or other information you wish to receive confidential

treatment and mark such materials “CONFIDENTIAL”. Where a portion of an otherwise nonconfidential document is alleged to be confidential, the confidential portions should be clearly identified and marked.

2. State the basis for your claim of confidentiality (whether trade secret, commercial or financial information, or competitive position information) and whether disclosure of the information would likely result in substantial harm to your business. If substantial harm would result from disclosure, state what those harmful effects would be and their causal connection to disclosure of the information;

3. State the period of time for which confidential treatment is desired (e.g., until a certain date, until the occurrence of a specific event, or permanently);

4. Submit nonconfidential information (including any redacted versions of partially confidential documents) separate from all materials for which you request confidential treatment.

All confidentiality claims are subject to verification by the MassCEC. If no confidentiality claim is made when information is received by the MassCEC, then it may be made publicly available without further notice to you.

11. Audit

At any time period prior to the completion of the Project and as otherwise provided in this Section, MassCEC will have the right to audit Participant’s or its other agents’ records to confirm the use of the Grant proceeds. If such audit reveals that any portion of the Grant was utilized for purposes not permitted under the applicable Task Order, then Participant shall refund to MassCEC the amount determined by such audit within thirty (30) days of Participant’s receipt of such audit and demand. Participant shall maintain books, records, and other compilations of data pertaining to the Grant payments made under an applicable Task Order to the extent and in such detail as shall properly substantiate use of such payments. All such records shall be kept for a period of seven (7) years,


Page 4


starting on the first day after final payment under an applicable Task Order (the “Retention Period”). If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records is commenced prior to the expiration of the Retention Period, all records shall be retained until completion of the audit or other action and resolution of all issues resulting there from, or until the end of the Retention Period, whichever is later. MassCEC or the Commonwealth or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have the right at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice, to examine and copy at reasonable expense, the books, records, and other compilations of data of the Participant which pertain to the provisions and requirements of this Grant. Such access may include on-site audits, review and copying of records.

12. Conflict of Interest

Participant acknowledges that all MassCEC employees are subject to the Massachusetts Conflict of Interest statute, located at Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 268A.

13. Lobbying

No Grant funds may be used to pay for or otherwise support any activities intended to influence any matter pending before the Massachusetts General Court or for activities covered by the law and regulations governing “legislative agents” or “executive agents” set forth in the Massachusetts Lobbying Law, M.G.L. c.3, §39.

14. Choice of Law

This Agreement shall be construed under, and governed by, the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without giving effect to its conflict of laws principles. The Participant agrees to bring any Federal or State legal proceedings arising under this Grant in which the Commonwealth or MassCEC is a party in a court of competent jurisdiction within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This Section shall not be construed to limit any other legal rights of the parties.

15. Force Majeure

Neither party shall be liable to the other, or be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement for any failure or delay in rendering performance arising out of causes beyond its reasonable control and without its fault or negligence. Such causes may include, but are not limited to, acts of God or of a public enemy, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, or unusually severe weather. Dates or times of performance including the Term of this Agreement may be extended to account for delays excused by this Section, provided that the party whose performance is affected notifies the other promptly of the existence and nature of such delay.

16. Waivers

Conditions, covenants, duties and obligations contained in this Agreement may be waived only by written agreement between the parties. Forbearance or indulgence in any form or manner by a party shall not be construed as a waiver, nor in any way limit the remedies available to that party.

17. Severability

Each provision of this Agreement shall be treated as a separate and independent clause and any decision from a court of competent jurisdiction to the effect that any clause or provision of this Agreement is null or unenforceable shall in no way impair the validity, power or enforceability of any other clause or provision of this Agreement.

18. Notice

All communications to MassCEC regarding legal issues shall be mailed or delivered to the following address, or sent by facsimile to the following number:

Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Commonwealth Wind Incentive Program: Community Scale

Solicitation No. 2010-CWIPCS-02Page 5

Attachment No. 3

Site Owner Commitment Letter

Attachment No. 4

Resumes

1

H. JEFFREY BRANDT EDUCATION MA, Environmental Studies, Brown University, 1997 B.S., Industrial Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 1984 AREAS OF EXPERTISE Mr. Brandt has program management and technical experience in the following general areas:

• Wind Power Development • Regulatory Analysis and Permitting • Siting of Energy Facilities • FERC Gas Pipeline and LNG Resource Report Development • FERC Third Party EISs • Visual Impact Studies • Socio Economic Analysis

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Brandt is a Senior Project Manager with TRC’s Energy Group and has over 20 years experience in the siting and environmental permitting of electric generation facilities, including wind turbines, gas pipelines and electric transmission line projects across the country. Mr. Brandt works with proponents to develop project design, site selection, and permit filings needed to achieve full regulatory compliance. He manages preparation of critical issues analyses, performs siting studies, and conducts due diligence work for energy facilities. At TRC, Mr. Brandt manages field studies, directs the preparation of environmental assessments and permit documents, and provides expert testimony for clients at public hearings. Prior to joining TRC, Mr. Brandt worked as a senior analyst at the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board, where he was responsible for evaluating and writing license decisions for more than a dozen energy projects. Mr. Brandt has also worked at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as a Project Manager in their Regulatory Branch. Some representative projects of Mr. Brandt’s at TRC include: Patriots Renewable Energy, South Coast Wind Project – Buzzards Bay, MA (Project Manager) Mr. Brandt coordinated siting constraints and critical flaw evaluation of a potential commercial scale offshore wind energy project being proposed for Buzzards Bay. TRC provided an evaluation of the natural and human resource, regulatory, and permitting issues and constraints for a wind project potentially consisting of between 50 and 150 turbines to be located in the waters of Buzzards Bay. Emera Corporation, Petcoke Electric Generation Facility, St. Lucia (Project Manager) Mr. Brandt wrote a siting study and prepared the critical issues analysis for a proposed Petcoke Electric Generation facility in St. Lucia. Work included

H. Jeffrey Brandt

2

coordination of environmental studies, and analysis of development constraints at several sites around the Island. Analyses included evaluation of land use and access issues, and compliance with international standards for air emissions, water discharges, and aeronautical safety standards. Current work includes preparation of a scoping document and EIS for the Project. Calpine Eastern Corporation, Critical Issues Analyses – VA (Project Manager) Mr. Brandt managed the preparation of critical issues analyses for two different sites for construction of a gas fired combined cycle power generation plant. The critical issues analysis included a detailed analysis of federal, state and local permitting requirements, the development of a project schedule, and a cultural resource site assessment. In addition, Mr. Brandt managed the natural resource assessment, which included: wetlands and terrestrial resources, water supply and wastewater discharge. Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) – Renewable Energy Siting Study (ENV 09 POL-05) Mr. Brandt managed a study on behalf of EEA to assess the regulatory process for wind development in Massachusetts, to identify delays in local and state permitting, and evaluate if those delays have significantly affected the development of projects and imposed unreasonable costs upon project proponents. The work included interviewing wind developers to understand their perceptions of the Massachusetts permit process and development of wind projects in Massachusetts in general. In addition, TRC performed six case studies of wind projects in Massachusetts to assess issues affecting their development. Finally, TRC evaluated regulatory programs in other states to see what other states have done to make permitting easier for wind projects. U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Cape Wind Project – Nantucket Sound, MA (Project Manager 2005-2008) Mr. Brandt managed preparation of the National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed 420 MW Cape Wind Park to be located offshore in Horseshoe Shoal in Nantucket Sound, Massachusetts. Work included directing the review and summarization of over 45,000 comment letters, development of data request lists, and preparation of a complete third party EIS covering an extensive and diverse array of impacts including: impacts to FAA airspace, impacts to radar and other communication devices in the area, avian impacts, noise impacts, impacts to rare and endangered species, construction and operational impacts, navigation impacts and other issues. Other work included organization and management of four public hearings attended by over 2000 people.

H. Jeffrey Brandt

3

Pacific Gas and Electric Corporation, Permitting Services – Salem, MA (Project Manager) Mr. Brandt worked as project manager and provided consulting services for the regulatory permitting of an 85 million dollar emission control project to bring PGE’s 745 megawatt coal fired electric generation facility (Salem Harbor Station) into compliance with the Massachusetts air quality regulations at 310 CMR 7.29. Activities included strategic planning to assess permitting, cost and scheduling sensitivities given different emission control technology designs and the use of new low sulfur coal supplies. Mr. Brandt directed the preparation of local, state and federal environmental permit applications related to water quality and air quality, provided expert testimony, represented PG&E at 7 public hearings, and worked to provide solutions that would allow PG&E to adhere to a variety of environmental site constraints and operational restrictions as a result of administrative consent orders from the Department of Environmental Protection. Additional work has included the Massachusetts Chapter 91 regulatory permitting for the removal of structures on filled tidelands, obtaining numerous local and state regulatory authorizations for filling four wastewater treatment basins, and regulatory permitting for two temporary barge unloading facilities. Mr. Brandt worked on development of a contractor environmental control plan, soil management plan, and health and safety plan. He managed development of the NPDES storm water pollution prevention plans for filling of the basins and construction of the Emissions Control Project. Rhode Island Office of Economic Development, Rhode Island Winds Siting Project – RI (Project Manager) Mr. Brandt managed the development of environmental site screening methodology and criteria to support a state wide siting study to identify the most viable onshore and offshore wind facility sites in Rhode Island. Mr. Brandt identified environmental and land use criteria which was then plotted via GIS and mapped to help narrow down likely candidate sites based on the avoidance of sensitive environmental resources, and incompatible land uses. Mr. Brandt used his expertise in FAA regulatory requirements in order to identify geographic areas that were likely unsuitable for wind turbines due to height conflicts with Part 77 of FAA regulations titled Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. Mr. Brandt also coordinated the development of economic siting criteria using TRC’s subsidiary, TRC EPRO, which has extensive expertise in siting and costing issues related to the installation of high voltage electric interconnection lines. Confidential Client, SEQR Filing – New York City, NY (Project Manger) Mr. Brandt worked as the project manager for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for review under the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process. Mr. Brandt organized and directed a full range of environmental studies including air quality, water, noise, traffic, safety, cultural resources, wetlands and aquatic resources, visual, land use and socio economics.

1

JOSHUA BROWN EDUCATION B.S. 2003 - Environmental Forest Biology and Forest and Natural Resources Management, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Brown is a Project Manager with four years of experience in wind energy industry. As a Project Manager Mr. Brown has been involved with and managed the permitting of over 400mw of operational wind projects as well as over 500mw of wind projects in different stages of development. Mr. Brown has managed multi-disciplinary teams through all stages of wind farm development including, site identification, fatal flaw analysis, pre-construction environmental studies, permit applications at local, state and federal levels, regulatory and interested agency involvement, construction monitoring and post construction monitoring. NY Wind Energy Projects Clinton County New York - Noble Clinton Windpark, Noble Ellenburg Windpark, Noble Altona Windpark (Environmental Field Engineer 2005-2006) Mr. Brown was responsible for coordinating the windparks layout, site specific wetland and cultural resources studies, production of town applications and was involved in the local, state and federal permitting. Mr. Brown was also involved with the financing, construction monitoring and negotiations of post construction study protocol. The Clinton County Windparks were among the first in New York State and helped form the permitting process for future windparks in the state. Franklin County New York -Noble Chateaugay Windpark, Noble Bellmont Windpark and Other Early Development Projects (Environmental Project Manager 2006-2009) Mr. Brown was the Environmental Project Manager responsible for all permitting efforts and agency contact for Noble Environmental Power’s development work in Franklin County New York. This included assisting in obtaining town laws regulating wind turbines, oversight of all environmental consultants, editing and compilation of permitting documents for the town, state and federal agencies. Western NY Windparks (Environmental Project Manager 2005-2009) Mr. Brown assisted in the development of the Noble Environmental Power Windparks in WNY and was primarily involved in initial windpark layout and coordinating with civil engineers, wetland delineation teams and wind resource assessment teams.

Joshua Brown

2

New England Wind Energy Projects Granite Reliable Power (Environmental Project Manager 2007-2009) Mr. Brown was responsible for all environmental aspects of windpark development from initial site investigations through to submission of permitting documents and the Site Evaluation Committee (SEC) process. This included coordination of all permitting agency contacts, project scheduling, wetland mitigation site negotiations, sensitive area mitigation site negotiations environmental field work, windpark layout, SEC public hearings and technical sessions, drafting and editing of SEC application and ACOE application. Noble Environmental Power Site Prospecting and Early Development for New England (Environmental Project Manager 2007-2009) Mr. Brown was the Environmental Project Manager responsible for evaluating potential windpark sites for environmental and permitting issues. He was also involved with scoping of necessary environmental studies, oversight of windpark layout, permitting agency coordination and scheduling.

1

JOHN P. DEVILLARS EDUCATION BA University of Pennsylvania MPA Harvard University SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr. DeVillars currently advises brownfield developers and environmental and renewable energy companies in the areas of project management, financing and capital sourcing, regulatory approvals, community and government relations and business development. Prior to joining TRC Mr. DeVillars was the Co-Founder and Managing Partner of BlueWave Strategies and Managing Partner of its affiliated investment group, BlueWave Capital. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE From 2000 to 2003, Mr. DeVillars served as the Executive Vice President of Brownfields Recovery Corporation (“BRC”), a Boston-based real estate investment and development company that focuses on environmentally impaired properties. He remains very active in BRC’s current development projects including– a 1200-acre industrial port facility in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands – where, among other services, he is involved in site planning, project management, permitting, and the incorporation of green building standards and the use of renewable energy (wind, solar, biomass) and other sustainability measures. From 1994 to 2000, Mr. DeVillars served as the New England Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, where he directed the operations of 800 employees and a $400 million annual budget. Under his leadership EPA New England was recognized as a national leader in smart growth, regulatory reform, environmental technology, and brownfields development, winning more awards for successful reform than any other EPA office. Mr. DeVillars led EPA's efforts in achieving precedent-setting environmental settlements with the United States Departments of Defense, Air Force and National Guard; General Electric and Pfizer Corporations; New Hampshire, Maine and Massachusetts Departments of Transportation; and numerous municipal governments throughout New England. Mr. DeVillars previously served as Secretary of Environmental Affairs for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Chairman of the Board of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, and Chief of Operations for Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis. From 1991 to 1994, he was Director of the Environmental Services Group for Coopers & Lybrand where he initiated and led the firm’s environmental management systems group. He has received numerous awards

John P. DeVillars

2

for his environmental service, including the President’s Award of the Nature Conservancy, given annually for national leadership in environmental affairs. Mr. DeVillars holds an MPA from Harvard University and a BA from the University of Pennsylvania. He serves on the Board of Directors of Clean Harbors, Inc., Converted Organics, Inc., Alteris Renewables, the Advisory Boards of Global Energy Investors and izzitgreen.com and several non-profit organizations including The Walden Woods Project and the Massachusetts Environmental Trust. Mr. DeVillars was a member of Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick's Energy and Environment Transition Working Group. From 1999 to 2003 Mr. DeVillars held the position of Lecturer in Environmental Policy in the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and continues to lecture at MIT, the Harvard Graduate School of Design and the Kennedy School of Government.

KEVIN K. FOUGÈRE, EIT EDUCATION B.S., Electrical Engineering and Technology, University of Maine, 1998 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS Registered Engineer in Training, October 1998, State of Maine AREAS OF EXPERTISE Mr. Fougére has technical experience in the following areas:

• Feasibility Studies • System Impact Studies • Power Factor Requirements Studies • System Security Assessment Studies • Capacitor Switching Transient Studies • Stability Model Assessment and Development • Short Circuit Studies • Long Range Planning • Short Range Planning

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Fougére has nine years of experience in the electric utility industry with six years experience in electric utility planning and technical support and three years experience as a distribution engineer. He currently serves as a Senior Power Systems Engineer. Various Clients, System Impact Studies – New England ISO (Power Systems Engineer: 2001 – Present)

• A 25MW wind farm generation interconnection located on PSNH’s 34.5kV system in Lempster, NH (2006)

• A 25MW generation addition at Fraser Paper in Berlin, New Hampshire. • A 42 MW Biomass Redevelopment interconnection for Genpower Athens

on CMP’s 115-kV system in Athens, Maine (2006) • A 210MW generation interconnection at the Northeast Utilities Waterside

Station in Southwestern Connecticut (2006) • A 105MW generation interconnection at the Northeast Utilities Company’s

Cob Station in Southwestern Connecticut (2006) • Closing the CMP 115-kV Y138 transmission line from Saco Valley to

White Lake, New Hampshire (2001-2004) New York ISO (2006 – Present)

• A 130MW wind farm generation interconnection located on NGrid’s 115-kV system in Cape Vincent, NY (2006-2007)

1

Kevin K. Fougere, EIT

2

• System Impact Study evaluation of Material Changes to various New York wind farm projects (2007)

Various Clients, Feasibility Studies (Power Systems Engineer)

• Burlington Electric Department: Assisted -Burlington Electric Department in Vermont by performing steady-state analyzes and determining cost benefit of various municipal electric upgrades. (2003)

• Performed various wind-farm feasibility studies in New York, New England, Illinois and in Texas which have involved GE, Vestas, Siemens, Suzlon and Gamesa wind generation. (2004-2007)

New Hampshire Power Factor Requirements Study (Power Systems Engineer: 2004)

• Co-contributor in the 2004 New Hampshire Power Factor Requirement Study

Maine Public Service, System Security Assessment Studies (Power Systems Engineer: 2002-2003)

• Performed a System Security Assessment for Maine Public Service transmission system reliability

Various Clients, Capacitor Switching Transient Studies (Power Systems Engineer: 2003-2004)

• Rochester Gas & Electric: Assisted in the development of circuit models used to analyze transient over-voltages related to capacitor switching for Rochester Gas & Electric Station 80 in New York (2003)

• Northeast Utilities: Assisted in the development of circuit models used to analyze transient over-voltages related to capacitor switching for the Three Rivers (2004).

Stability Model Assessment and Development (Power Systems Engineer: 2002-Present)

• Performed various generator, exciter, and governor steady-state, short-circuit and stability model assessments along with developing various relay models using PSS\E, PSLF and ASPEN.

Washington Electric Cooperative, Short Range Planning (Power Systems Engineer: 2001-2002)

• Developed a comprehensive four year work plan for Washington Electric Cooperative.

Kevin K. Fougere, EIT

Washington Electric Cooperative, Long Range Planning (Power Systems Engineer: 2003-2004)

• Conducted a distribution system analysis and planning study for Washington Electric Cooperative which consisted of, but was not limited to system-wide load allocation, overcurrent protection and coordination, and the identification of all cost-effective capacitor installations, phase balancing and conservation voltage regulation strategies. Identified thermally overloaded and voltage constrained circuits over a 20-year load forecast.

SPECIALIZED TRAINING

• Siemens PSS\E & MUST, GE PSLF transmission system analysis software

• ASPEN, SKM and EDSA power system tools • ATPDraw Transient Analysis • VisSim (complex dynamic systems simulation software for Control System

Design) • Programming languages Python, PSS/E, Fortran, C++, Microsoft Visual

Basic and Access

3

1

ALFRED M. KLAUSMANN EDUCATION BS, Meteorology, State University of New York, Oswego, 1980 Graduate Program, Atmospheric Science, University of Maryland, 1980-1981 Graduate Program, Atmospheric Science, New York University, Department of Applied Science, 1986-1987 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS Certified Consulting Meteorologist, (#463), 1990 AREAS OF EXPERTISE Mr. Klausmann has over 20 years experience encompassing:

• Air Quality Modeling • Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling • Meteorological Data Analysis • Meteorological Analysis and Forecasting

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Klausmann is a certified consulting meteorologist with more than 20 years of experience in the areas of air quality and applied meteorology. He has expertise with a wide range of air quality models including the CALMET/CALPUFF modeling system. He has performed numerous air quality impact assessments and meteorological studies to support permitting, environmental impact reports, siting and feasibility studies, consequence analysis for potential hazardous chemical releases and nuclear emergency preparedness. He has performed numerous CALMET and CALPUFF modeling studies for various industrial facilities, including long range transport modeling for visibility impact studies. Al has worked extensively with the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale meteorological model (MM5). He has conducted real time daily MM5 simulations over New Zealand for the Americas Cup races, conducted real-time MM5 simulations, for Sydney-Hobart Yacht Race in Australia during December 2000 and for the 2002 Volvo Ocean race, which involved designing and implementing real-time MM5 simulations over several geographical regions worldwide. Al has also conducted MM5 simulations with four dimensional data assimilation over Brazil to support air quality impact studies using the CALMET/CALPUFF models. Al has worked on the MM5 model setup and sensitivity simulations for FDDA modeling over the Appalachian Mountains of Virginia. In addition, he has provided real time meteorological analysis and forecasts globally to support both the America’s Cup races and the Volvo Ocean Race. He has also provided specialized forecasting services on several projects to support air and storm water sampling operations. Al has been recently active in expanding the meteorological service capabilities of TRC to the wind energy community, including application of the CALMET model for wind resource assessment.

Alfred M. Klausmann

2

Louisville Gas & Electric, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler-2004 and 2006-2007) Performed CALMET and CALPUFF model simulations to determine visibility impacts at the Mammoth Cave National Park in Kentucky. Performed extensive AERMOD simulations for a Class II air quality impact analysis. CMS Energy (Project Manager - 2006) Performed a comprehensive assessment of the meteorological monitoring program being used for assessing the wind resource at a site in Connecticut. Data analysis was performed on wind measurements from both an anemometer/wind vane and a SODAR to assess the data quality and recovery. Recommendations were prepared for implementation of a new meteorological monitoring system. Dominion Coal Project, Southwest Virginia, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling, (Project Meteorologist, 2005-2006) Conducted CALMET and CALPUFF modeling to determine ambient air quality and visibility impacts at surrounding Class I Areas due to emissions from a proposed coal-fired boiler. This work involved modeling for several candidate power plant sites in southwest Virginia. Worked on development of the MM5 model setup and testing strategy for multi-year FDDA simulations. Burns&McDonnell Western Farmers, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Project Meteorologist 2004-2005) Provided support to the client for conducting a CALMET/CALPUFF modeling study to assess visibility impacts at the Caney Creek Wilderness Area. This work involved providing guidance to the client on how to parameterize particulate emissions, overall setup of the CALMET and CALPUFF models and preparation of surface, upper air, and precipitation data for input to the CALMET model and preparation of hourly ozone concentration files for input to the CALPUFF model. Longleaf Energy Associates, Early County, Georgia, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler, 2003-2004) Conducted CALMET and CALPUFF modeling to assess the air quality and visibility impacts at two Class I areas in northwest Florida due to emissions from a proposed 1200 megawatt coal-fired power plant. Work involved determining air quality impacts at the Bradwell Bay Wilderness Area and both air quality and visibility impacts at the St Marks Wilderness Area. Confidential Power Plant, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler 2003-2004) Conducted CALMET and CALPUFF modeling study of emissions from a coal-fired power plant. The CALPUFF simulations examined both near field impacts within a very large modeling domain where the long-range transport of pollutants are important. The objective was to determine ground level concentrations due to the emissions of various metals and toxic air pollutants.

Alfred M. Klausmann

3

Alcoa Baie Comeau Aluminum Plant, Baie Comeau, Quebec, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler 2002-2003) Performed a fine-scale CALMET and CALPUFF modeling study to assess the impacts of hydrogen fluoride emissions within the surrounding environment. This work involved modeling a complex array of emissions sources and multiple operating scenarios to determine concentration fields of hydrogen fluoride. Alcoa, Badin Works Facility, Badin, North Carolina, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler 1998-2001) Performed CALMET and CALPUFF modeling study to assess impacts of air toxics emissions, which included modeling hydrogen fluoride and particulate fluoride emissions from multiple sources. Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler 2000-2002) Performed CALMET and CALPUFF modeling to evaluate the impacts of emissions from cogeneration facilities at several locations over eastern Saudi Arabia. Determined impacts for multiple operating scenarios. Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Modeler 2002-2003) Performed CALMET and CALPUFF modeling over western Saudi Arabia to assess the air quality impacts due to emissions of SO2, PM10, and NOX. Conducted detailed multiple site analysis of complex emission sources and analysis of a large matrix of operational scenarios. Alcoa, Mount Holly, South Carolina, CALMET and CALPUFF Modeling (Modeler 2001-2002) Performed a CALMET/CALPUFF modeling study to support a PSD permit application Conducted both a near-field air quality analysis and an analysis of air quality and visibility impacts within the Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge. Performed a cumulative impact analysis using a background source inventory consisting of several hundred sources. Team Tyco, Volvo Ocean Race, Worldwide, MM5 Modeling and Weather Forecasting (Project Meteorologist, 2001-2002) Provided meteorological support. Conducted real time MM5 simulations, and provided routine weather briefings and forecasts within several geographical regions including South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, coastal Brazil, eastern United States and Europe. Performed real-time MM5 simulations as well as weather briefings and forecasts during the 2001 Sydney-Hobart Yacht race as part of a training exercise for Team Tyco in preparation for the Volvo Ocean Race.

Alfred M. Klausmann

4

NE Utilities, Bow, New Hampshire, CTDMPLUS, ISC, CALPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler 1997-1999) Performed air quality modeling analysis of SO2 emissions from a coal-fired power plant using the ISC, CTDMPLUS and CALPUFF dispersion models. Conducted modeling over a 100 x 100 kilometer domain using on-site meteorological data. CTDMPLUS modeling was performed for over 18 terrain features. Power Development Corporation, Milford, Connecticut, ISC Modeling (Lead Modeler 1998-1999) Performed air quality impact analysis to support the permitting effort for a combined cycle electric generating facility. American National Power, Blackstone and Bellingham, Massachusetts, ISC Modeling (Lead Modeler, 1997-1998) Performed air quality impact analysis to support the permitting effort for combined cycle electric generating facilities, which involved air toxics modeling, visibility modeling and a cumulative impact assessment. US Navy, Indian Head Naval Propellant Plant, Maryland ISC Modeling (Lead Modeler, 1995-1996) Performed an air quality impact analysis to demonstrate on site predicted concentrations due to emissions from proposed bombproof facilities were below threshold limit values for eleven air toxics. US Army, Seneca Army Depot, Romulus, New York, INPUFF Modeling (Lead Modeler 1994-1995) Performed dispersion modeling analysis for the Army Subpart X Permit for open burning and open detonation activities, which involved estimating average concentration and total annual deposition of various contaminants using the INPUFF dispersion model. United Technologies, Pratt & Whitney Jet Engine Manufacturing Plant, Middletown, Connecticut, COMPDEP Modeling (Lead Modeler, 1994-1995) Performed dispersion modeling using EPA's COMPDEP model to estimate annual total particulate deposition around the plant. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Dispersion Modeling, Upton, New York, DEGADIS Modeling (Lead Modeler 1990-1991) Performed dispersion modeling with EPA's Dense Gas Dispersion (DEGADIS) model to estimate the detonable mass of propane released from proposed tanks.

Attachment No. 5

Electricity Use

l

City of Fall River, MA

Facility Reference IDOccupied Area

(SF) Elec Account NumberAverage Yearly

(kWH)

Energy Delivered During Peak Hours (kWH)

Maximum Monthly August 2006 - July 2008

(kWH)

Sum of IndividuaPeak Months August 2006 -

July 2008 (kWH)

Average August 2007 - July 2008

Blended Rate ($/kWH)

Average August 2007 - July 2008

Blended Rate ($/kWH) Months with No Power Use Removed) Rate Code Elec Account Number Elec Account Number Elec Account Number 50

Government Center and City Council Chambers GovCen 112,200 7604780008 1,917,000 921,500 271,500 2,046,000 0.148 0.148 G3A/S5A 526293 (Must not exceed total number of tabs remainiWaste Water Treatment Plant -1 WWTP-1 0 404449001 9,647,467 3,660,085 1,013,600 10,348,000 0.127 0.127 G3A 527263Waste Water Treatment Plant -2 WWTP-2 0 1634322009 1,347,200 517,969 156,120 1,471,680 0.134 0.134 G3A 527265Central Fire Station CFS 20,000 7604761003 65,387 65,387 17,019 78,455 0.172 0.172 G1AEdmund P Talbot Middle School ETMS 120,000 7550439003 1,383,667 729,000 259,000 1,541,000 0.144 0.144 G3A/S1ANew Matthew J. Kuss Middle School NKMS 180,000 5369529005 0 0 0 0 0.000 G2ABMC Durfee High School-1 DRFE1 560,000 2525947015 2,267 2,267 3,400 6,800 0.028 0.167 G1A/G3A/S1ABMC Durfee High School-2 DRFE2 560,000 8763314001 642,600 459,200 155,400 764,400 0.172 0.172 G1A/G3A/S1ABMC Durfee High School-3 DRFE3 560,000 3773247003 4,910,247 2,512,405 513,863 5,150,382 0.140 0.140 G1A/G3A/S1AJohn J Doran Elementary School JDES 76,818 6486133006 597,000 361,600 99,200 694,200 0.039 0.039 G3A/S4AHenry Lord Middle School HLMS 122,350 4101893005 1,057,280 545,973 260,640 1,240,640 0.153 0.153 G3A/S4AWilliam S. Greene Elementary School WSGES 138,625 2786583008 888,400 495,733 190,600 1,152,400 0.125 0.150 G3AFrank M. Silvia Elementary School FMSES 116,383 1352741006 933,000 507,133 91,400 1,005,800 0.038 0.038 G3ASpencer Borden Elementary School SBES 91,408 2525727004 747,333 405,000 86,200 852,000 0.041 0.041 G3A/S1AOld Matthew J Kuss Middle School OKMS 120,438 7623897000 203,307 203,307 27,040 275,360 0.015 0.045 G2AFacilities and Operation-1 F&O1 114,415 5131114009 20,861 20,861 4,260 33,642 0.021 0.063 G1A/G2AFacilities and Operation-2 F&O2 114,415 6577718002 53,680 20,861 11,520 95,520 0.015 0.045 G1A/G2AJames Madison Morton Middle School-1 JMMMS1 107,700 5130369000 156,960 156,960 22,560 216,400 0.018 0.054 G2A/S1A/G1AJames Madison Morton Middle School-2 JMMMS2 107,700 5074611005 15,296 15,296 5,287 24,265 0.079 0.237 G2A/S1A/G1AHealy Elementary School HES 29,469 307471003 48,387 48,387 8,840 70,600 0.020 0.060 G1A/S1ASusan H Wixon Elementary School SWES 61,424 348312005 60,653 60,653 8,560 79,480 0.025 0.060 G1A/S1AWater Works -1 WW1 0 2876751005 5,165,867 2,029,067 844,800 6,240,800 0.026 0.026 G3A/G1AWater Works-2 WW2 0 6522875007 14,601 14,601 3,081 20,203 0.070 0.168 G3A/G1AWater Works-3 WW3 0 5037740001 12,666 12,666 3,502 20,058 0.055 0.165 G3A/G1AWater Works-4 WW4 0 5276557008 23,213 23,213 4,036 32,441 0.069 0.166 G3A/G1A_26 _26 0 0_27 _27 0 0_28 _28 0 0_29 _29 0 0_30 _30 0 0_31 _31 0 0_32 _32 0 0_33 _33 0 0_34 _34 0 0_35 _35 0 0_36 _36 0 0_37 _37 0 0_38 _38 0 0_39 _39 0 0_40 _40 0 0_41 _41 0 0_42 _42 0 0_43 _43 0 0_44 _44 0 0_45 _45 0 0_46 _46 0 0_47 _47 0 0_48 _48 0 0_49 _49 0 0_50 _50 0 0

29,914,337 13,789,123 4,061,428 33,460,526 0.075 0.113

Attachment No. 6

FORM B-2

Site Assessment Deliverables Template


Form B-2

Form B-2

Site Assessment Deliverables Template


Form B-2 - 2 -

(

e 1) Contact Information

Project Contact Nam Jeff Brandt Project Contact Phone # 978-656-3662 Project Contact Email [email protected]

( tion

formation

2) Site Informa

Site In

Latitude 41.7215 Longitude -71.0600 Elevation (ft) 308 feet Annual On-site Electricity

n (kWh) ase distribution line supplies

needs of communication towers). Details on Fall River’s municipal electricity needs are provided in Attachment No. 5.

ConsumptioMinim

tedal (single-ph

limi

Property Owner City of Fall River Distribution Utility National Grid Is there an electric utat the Site?

ility meter Yes

Electric Rate Class cipal use Attachment No.

Unknown at site. Fall River munielectric rate classes provided in5.

Is the site serviced by tphase electric powe

hrr?

of the site is crossed by 115 kV lines. In addition, a portion of the turbine planning area includes areas adjacent to Yellow

ution lines power.

ee- The northern end

Hill Road, which is served by distribthat also have three-phased electric

Does your municipality have a Yes. See Attachment No. 8wind zoning bylaw? If so, provide a copy.

.

( boxes, as needed)

en spaces on site, orhood.

ff the east side r. The area is ction and is

pt for a dirt access road leading to the top of the hill, and a

eighborhoods

orological (met) tower would be positioned. The area of interest on the site for wind development includes 160 acres of land all of which is located on a hill situated above the 90 meter elevation contour. Adjacent properties are all wooded and do not have any habitable structures. There are no GIS mapped wetlands on the met tower planning site. There is a small area of GIS mapped wetlands along the south side of the access road to the top of Copicut Hill within the larger 160-acre turbine planning area.

3) General Description of Property Use (1-2 Paragraphs – expand theDescribe the site, including information about: (a) property use, (b) op(c) buildings, trees or other obstacles, and (d) the surrounding neighb The proposed site is on and around Copicut Hill, which is located oof Yellow Hill Road in the eastern undeveloped portion of Fall Rivecurrently used by the Fall River Water Department for aquifer proteentirely forested excesmall clearing at the top of the hill where a few communication towers and a forest ranger/fire observation tower are located. There are no houses or nin the vicinity of the project. The closest home is off of Yellow Hill Road to the southwest and is more than 1,800 feet away from where the mete


Form B-2 - 3 -

port from http://cwest.cadmusweb.com/

(4) Wind Resource Assessment

Generate and attach the MassCEC Commonwealth Wind Site Resource Re. Please provide all 3 screens (General Information, Site

The Commonwealth Wind Site Resource Report).

Provide an energy production estimate for up to three of the turbine models being ld include the

all River is evaluating two types of turbines. These are summarized below:

e statistics for ea V90 – 1.8MW Turbine

Capacity 00 kW

Characteristics, and See Attachment No. 7.

(5) Energy Production and Usage Estimate

considered for the site. For each turbine size being considered, this shoufollowing (add copies of this Table, as needed): The City of F Performanc ch Vestas Turbine 1,8Turbine Manufacturer and Vestas V90 Model Rotor Diameter 90 meters Wind Speed Estimate at 70m 6.4 m/s Hub Height 80-90 meters Wind Speed Translated to Hub 7.0 m/s Height Estimated Annual kWh Out 415 MWhs put 4,

ance statistics fPerform or ea V82 – 1.65MW Turbine

rbine Capacity 1,650 kW

ch Vestas TuTurbine Manufacturer and stas V82 Model VeRotor Diameter 82 meters Wind Speed Estimate at 70m 6.4 m/s Hub Height 80 meters Wind Speed Translated to Hub Height

6.6 m/s

Estimated Annual kWh Output 4,040 MWhs

(6) Aerial Site Map A) Insert an aerial site map of the proposed turbine location that outlines the major

and 1000, and tions of the items

referenced in the table below and indicate distance to nearest residence(s) and any other environmentally sensitive areas.

See figure in attachment 6A following this form

B) If a wind bylaw is in place, indicate setback distances required by the bylaw (if no bylaw is in place or listed setbacks are not specified, please indicate “NA”):

property lines. Draw concentric rings on the aerial site map at 500 1500 feet from the proposed turbine location. Identify the loca


Form B-2 - 4 -

ed Distance (ft. or miles) Setback Requir Closest occupied stru bylaw,

hall be set ual to the

e wind habited

rhead utility ivate rights p

boundaries of the which the turbine i

1,870 feet* cture According to the “Wind turbines sback a distance eqtotal height of thturbine from all instructures, ovelines, public or pr

way, and fromof roperty lot on s located.”

Closest publicly accessible space (e.g., schools, roads, bike paths, parks)

See above publically le space is East Line Trail unmaintained

adjacent to the site, and Yellow Hill Road, a dirt road more

00 feet to the west bine planning

Closest accessibCanfieldRoad, andirt road

than 5of the turarea.

Closest offresidential structure

site neighb See above et * oring 1,870 fe

Closest property line See above More than 500 feet * Closest wetlands (if within 1000 feet)

NA Greater than 100 feet *

Communication towers (if

NA Greater than 500 feet * towers/microwavewithin 3 miles) * Available se pending on actual location chosen hment 6A

tback distances could be significantly greater de for turbine(s) on the site. See Figure in Attac

(7) Site Map (5 Mile Radius) Insert an aerial site map indicating any airports within 5 miles of the property.

t 6B following this form

(8) EnvironmInsert aerial site maps with a GIS overlay of:

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern

DCR or Locally Designated Scenic Landscapes State Register of Historic Places

See figure in attachment 6C following this form

Provide a commentary (1-2 paragraphs) on whether any of these Environmental/Permitting items could be a fatal flaw to the project.

See figure

in attachmen

ental/Permitting

National Wetlands Inventory Protected and Recreational Open Space


Form B-2 - 5 -

cern, National nated Scenic

The GIS data base th Natural

his is not a ify via formal

) conduct a site walkover for said species and other ) develop a

uthern edge of does not have

o confirm this and ensure wetlands are not a critical flaw, the City of Fall River has requested funding for a wetlands survey at the met tower site and in the

feasibility

At the site, there are no mapped Areas of Critical Environmental ConWetlands Inventory, Protected and Recreational Open Space, DesigLandscapes, or areas on the State Register of Historic Places. does show an area beyond the site to the east that is labeled as boHeritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP) Priority Habitats for Rare Species and NHESP Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife. To ensure tcritical flaw, the City of Fall River is requesting funding to: 1) identrequest the species of concern; 2readily observable threatened and endangered (T&E) species; and 3construction mitigation plan as necessary. The GIS mapping shows there is a small area of wetlands on the sothe site, but that the rest of the almost 160-acre planning areawetlands. T

general area of where the turbines may be located (see details in application B-3).

( the electrical

ssion or distribution e-phase power if

g Yellow Hill line that

ng area. The City of Fall River has requested funding as part of this grant to conduct a critical flaw analysis

ction with nt indicates

interconnection work options would not affect bottom line of project economics

9) Interconnection (1 Paragraph). Please provide a brief description ofinfrastructure near the site, including the distance to closest transmilines and their voltage and capacity, distance to nearest available threnot on-site, and assumed interconnection points. ,

Potential interconnections include a three-phase distribution line alonRoad near the western edge of the turbine planning area, or a 115 kVcrosses the northern edge of the wind turbine planni

assessing interconnection issues and the optimal location for interconnerespect to both cost and environmental impact. Preliminary assessmesuch(Project pro forma is provided in Optional Attachment No. 1).

( omponents could be

tial route could be

The turbines could be transported from the north via Route 24 or from the west from Route 1 5 east to exit 11, Take Reed Road north to North Hixville Road, then North Hixville Road north to Yellow Hill

has allotted d impacts to

ct economics.

10) Site Access (1 Paragraph). Please describe how a turbine and its ctransported to the site from main highways. Maps depicting a potenincluded.

95. One feasible approach would be to take Route 19

Road, and then east on to the access road for Copicut Hill. The City of Fall River indicates the access road to the site would need to be improved and budget in the feasibility assessment to evaluate costs to understanproje

See figure in attachment 6D following this form

(11) Fatal Flaws (1-3 Paragraph)

Summarize any identified potential project fatal flaws and the management strategies proposed to address them. In addition to any items identified above, address at a minimum:


Form B-2 - 6 -

ation/site access potential

• space for construction (i.e. lay-down area)

rs that typically from the closest

residence, noise and shadow flicker will not be an issue. The site is also very large of equipment and

d will be rading and

delivery of the turbines. This should not be a critical flaw, and the n this access spect to delivery

towers on the

ge of potential ws with this project.

the large size of the site there are many locations for siting a turbine in the event a particular location is identified as causing a conflict in communications.

carefully evaluated in the feasibility study is availability and onse to

o. 9.

• transport• noise • shadow–flicker

• microwave/communications towers or radar facilities The advantage of this site is that is situated far from sensitive receptocan result in a critical flaw for a project. As it is more than 1,800 feet

(more than 160 acres) and thus there is ample room for lay-downconstruction. With respect to transportation, the site has a dirt access road. The roaadequate for delivery of the met tower equipment, but will require re-gwidening for feasibility assessment includes a detailed analysis of work needed oroad as well as any required improvements to local roadways with reof turbines. To address any potential impacts from the project on communication top of Copicut Hill, the feasibility study will conduct a communications impact study using the firm of Evans Associates. The study will evaluate the full rancommunication impacts to assess whether there are critical flaBecause of

Another issue that will besuitability of interconnection lines. This was discussed above in respQuestion N

(Provide a summary of recommended turbine sizes, if any that merit investigation in a feasibility study.

The City of Fall River is evaluating the use of 1.65 or 1.8 MW turbines. See details in response to Question No. 5 above and discussions of financial payback and revenue streams that would be associated with these options in the Feasibility Application Form B-3.

12) Recommendations (1 Paragraph)

Attachment No. 7

Wind Data

? <-Mouse over these icons for relevant help

General InformationName of Person Completing this FormApplicant NameApplicant Email AddressSite Address

Site and Wind Resource Information

Latitude 41.72 5.3 m/s 30m above eff. ground levelLongitude -71.06 5.9 m/s 50m above eff. ground level

6.4 m/s 70m above eff. ground level? Elevation 94 m

For Questions or Comments on this calculator:[email protected]

Average Annual WindspeedWind Resource Map Estimate of

Go To Step 2

Step 1: Enter the information about your proposed wind energy system in the green boxes.

Copicut Hill

Jeff Brandt

Jbrandt@TRCSolutions.,comCity of Fall River

Note:These windspeed estimates are a starting point. Using these values and the proposed site geographical information, to be entered in subsequent steps, CWEST l will model the site conditions and provide a site specific wind resource estimate.

?

This calculator tool was developed by The Cadmus Group, Inc. on behalf of the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MCEC). It is intended to provide a coarse estimate of wind resources and neither The Cadmus Group, nor MCEC, makes any guarantees as to the actual resource availablility for specific locations. Factors such as site condition parameters entered by the user, topography, geography, and other variables will all affect the model's resource estimation . The primary purpose of this tool is to predicate the probability of Wind Resource availability in Massachusetts. It is a preliminary rough estimate of what the likely wind resource is for the area of interest. It should not be used for system design. Should the resource estimate appear to be sufficient please contact a qualified wind turbine installer for a detailed site assesment.

Note:

Units

? ? ? ?

Wind Direction

Obstacle Type Description of Terrain/Obstacles

N ForestNNE ForestNE ForestENE ForestE ForestESE ForestSE ForestSSE ForestS ForestSSW ForestSW ForestWSW ForestW ForestWNW ForestNW ForestNNW Forest

Return to Step 1

Wind frequency numbers in the table below are automatically derived from the New England Wind Resource Map along with the entered coordinates. Use the pull down menus to describe the roughness of the terrain. If your site has thick vegetation or obstacles, such as forest, near (within 300 feet) of the tower base, estimate the average height of the obstacle and select an obstacle type from the drop down menu for each direction. Finally, you may proceed from this page to the Wind Resource Site Report. This report can be printed If you wish to have a hard copy of the Wind Resource Site Report.

4.70%5.08%4.30%

3535

1.81%

3.24%

3514.00%

4.38%3535

10.15%

35353535

Step 2: Site Characteristics

Frequency (Percent)

6.17%

Height of Nearby Obstacles

Terrain Roughness

35

3.02%

35

3535

2.15%

7.27%35

3535

8.35%7.80%

Generate Wind Resource Site Report

6.58%

11.00%

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Feet

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Vegetation

Report Date: 5/3/2010Report Completed By:Site Name:

Site InformationLatitude (decimal degrees) 41.72Longitude (decimal degrees) -71.06Elevation (m) 94

Direction Frequency Obstacle Height (m) DescriptionN 6.17% 11 ForestNNE 4.70% 11 ForestNE 5.08% 11 ForestENE 4.30% 11 ForestE 1.81% 11 ForestESE 2.15% 11 ForestSE 3.02% 11 ForestSSE 3.24% 11 ForestS 4.38% 11 ForestSSW 10.15% 11 Forest

SW 14.00% 11 ForestWSW 11.00% 11 ForestW 7.27% 11 ForestWNW 8.35% 11 ForestNW 7.80% 11 ForestNNW 6.58% 11 ForestAvg Obstacle Height (m) 11

Wind Resource StatisticsWeibull k Value 2.42Average Site Wind Shear Exponent 0.33

Wind Map Wind Speed (m/s)

Wind Speed Corrected for Site Factors (m/s)

5.3 4.95.9 5.66.4 6.1

www.cadmusgroup.com Questions: [email protected]

MCEC Commonwealth Wind Site Resource Report

Site Wind Rose (5% frequency/division)

Obstacle Height (10 ft/division)

70

Jeff BrandtCity of Fall River

The data displayed in this report is intended for preliminary assessment purposes only and should be combined with an appropriate feasibility study to determine project viability. This tool has been developed by the Cadmus Group, Inc., on behalf of the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Wind resource data is derived from AWS Truewind New England Wind Map.

Wind Map Reference Height (m)

NNNE

NEENEE ESE

SESSE

SSSW

SWWSW

WWNW

NWNNW

NNNE

NEENEE ESE

SESSE

SSSW

SWWSW

WWNW

NWNNW

Attachment No. 8

Fall River Wind Ordinance

Division 11 Wind Energy Facilities Sec. 86-403 Purpose

The purpose of this ordinance is to provide criteria which will help the City of Fall River evaluate a small wind project. Any proposed non-conforming small wind energy systems will be addressed through a special permit process under the review of the special permit granting authority.

(a) Applicability This section applies to small wind systems no greater than 60 kilowatts of rated nameplate capacity proposed to be constructed after the effective date of this section. This ordinance is not intended to cover roof-mounted, building-integrated, building-mounted or architectural wind systems; this ordinance only covers stand-alone tower mounted systems.

(b) Definitions

(1) Height: The height of a wind turbine measured from natural grade to the tip of the rotor blade at its highest point, or blade-tip height.

(2) Rated Nameplate Capacity: The maximum rated output of electric power production equipment. This output is typically specified by the manufacturer with a "nameplate" on the equipment.

(3) Small Wind Energy System: All equipment, machinery and structures utilized in connection with the conversion of wind to electricity. This includes, but is not limited to, storage, electrical collection and supply equipment, transformers, service and access roads, and one or more wind turbines, which has a rated nameplate capacity of 60 kW or less.

(4) Wind turbine: A device that converts kinetic wind energy into rotational energy that drives an electrical generator. A wind turbine typically consists of a tower, nacelle body, and a rotor with two or more blades.

Sec. 86-404 General Requirements

(a) A small wind energy system is permitted in any district provided the height is less than 75 feet and the system meets the Site Development Standards listed in Section 86-405.

(b) The board of appeals may grant a special permit for a small wind energy system with a height greater than 75 feet provided it meets all Site Development Standards listed in Section 86-405 and the board finds that the location, setback, and design of such structure will not be detrimental to the neighborhood or abutting properties by reason of safety, appearance or noise.

(c) Temporary Meteorological Towers (Met Towers): Met towers shall be permitted under the same standards as a small wind system, except that the requirements apply to a temporary structure. A permit for a temporary met tower shall be valid for a maximum of 3 years after which an extension may be granted.

Sec. 86-405 Site development standards

(a) Setbacks: Wind turbines shall be set back a distance equal to the total height of the wind turbine from all inhabited structures, overhead utility lines, public or private rights of way, and from property boundaries of the lot on which the turbine is located. (b) Setback Waiver: There are no setback waivers.

(c) Appearance, Color and Finish: The wind generator and tower shall remain painted or finished the non-reflective color or finish that was originally applied by the manufacturer, unless approved in the building permit.

(d) Lighting: Wind turbines shall be lighted only if required by the Federal Aviation Administration. Lighting of other parts of the small wind energy system, such as appurtenant structures, shall be limited to that required for safety and operational purposes, and shall be shielded from abutting properties.

(e) Signage and Advertising: Signs and advertising shall be restricted to reasonable identification of the manufacturer or operator of the small wind energy facility and shall defer to the requirements of the city sign regulations.

(g ) Noise: The small wind energy system and associated equipment shall conform with the provisions of the Department of Environmental Protection's, Division of Air Quality Noise Regulations (310 CMR 7.10), unless the Department and the Permit Granting Authority agree that those provisions shall not be applicable. (j) Removal Requirements: Any small wind energy system which has reached the

end of its useful life or has been abandoned shall be removed by the property owner within 3 months of deactivation. A small wind energy system shall be considered abandoned when it fails to operate for one year. Upon a Notice of Abandonment issued by the Building Inspector, the small wind energy system owner will have 30 days to provide sufficient evidence that the system has not been abandoned or the city shall have the authority to enter the owner's property and remove the system at the owner's expense.

Sec. 86-406 Permit Requirements

(a) Documents: The building permit application shall be accompanied by deliverables including the following:

(1) A plot plan showing:

(i) Property lines and physical dimensions of the subject property within 2 times the total height from the tower location. (ii) Location, dimensions, and types of existing major structures on the property and abutting properties. (iii) Location of the proposed wind system tower, foundations, guy anchors and associated equipment. (iv) The right-of-way of any public road that is contiguous with the property; (v) Any overhead utility lines;

(2) Wind system specifications, including manufacturer and model, rotor diameter, tower height, tower type (freestanding or guyed) (3) Tower foundation blueprints or drawings signed by a Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. (4) Tower blueprint or drawing signed by a Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. (5) Certification by a Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of MA certifying that the structure can withstand winds of up to 125 mph.

(b) Expiration: A permit issued pursuant to this ordinance shall expire if: (1) The small wind energy system is not installed and functioning within 24-months from the date the permit is issued; or, (2) The small wind energy system is abandoned.

(c) Administration and Enforcement: This ordinance shall be administered and enforced by the Building Inspector or other official as designated.

(1) The Building Inspector may enter any property for which a

building permit has been issued under this ordinance to conduct an inspection to determine whether the conditions stated in the permit have been met.

(2) The property owner shall file inspection reports with the Building Inspector once every five years on the anniversary date of the initial building permit issuance. Each report shall be completed by a Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and shall demonstrate that the structure continues to meet all required construction and installation standards.

Optional Attachment 1

Financial Analysis

HeliaVentures LLC - PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECT MODEL

Project: Fall River Wind 10.8MWInputs & Outputs Last Updated 9/17/2009($ in USD) Project model running: LEVERED CASEProject Cost Assumptions: Revenue Assumptions: Financing Assumptions:Project Summary: Annual Production Rate (DC) 4,415Project Name: Project: Fall River Wind 10.8MW Annual Production Rate (AC) 4,415 Construction Interest 10.0% 9 month $2,237,625Site: Fall River, MA First Year Production (MWHs) 26,490.24 IRR Leverage Effect #VALUE!Commercial Operation Date: 12/31/10 Initial Bid Price ($ / kWh) $0.1150 Minimum DSCR 1.53Duration: 20 years TOD adjustfactor 1.000 Manual Debt Sizing YES 70% 17,647,271Start Month 12 REC Price ($ / kWh) $0.0300 3Start Day 31 Initial TOD Adjusted Price ($ / kWh) (Year 1 - 3) $0.1450 LT Debt $17,647,271First Year Fraction 100% Annual Price escalation 2.5% Rate 7.0%EOY 1st Year 12/31/10 TOD Adjusted Price ($ / kWh) (Year 4 & beyond) $0.1250 Term 15 years

Annual Price escalation 2.5% 15bps increase every 3 years NOSystem & Installation Summary: Annual Output Degradation --% DSCR - Senior Debt 1.40System Capacity (MW-ac) 10.80 Letters of Credit $--System Capacity (MW-dc) 10.80 Repayment on Utility Interconnection Upgrade Rate 2.5%DC De-rating factor 0% Terms 5 years Term 25 years

Rate 7.5%Turnkey Project from Alteris 28,080,000 2.60 DSCR - Total Debt (LT Debt + LC) 1.83Contingency - - Line Loss - Transmission Owner Loss --% Cash Interest Rate 2.5%Other - - Line Loss - 100.0%Other - - Net Generation - Net Line Lose 100.0% Other Assumptions:Other - - Amortization of Financing Fees: ($ / Year)System Price ($ / Watt): 28,080,000 $2.60 Operating Assumptions: Debt Financing Fee (Levered Scenario) 18 years $--Annual Capacity Factor 28.0% Annual Cost $ ($ / W) Equity Financing Fee (Levered Scenario) 10 years $--Estimated CO2 Emission Credit 5.5450 Annual O&M (cents per kWh) $0.008 /kWh $198,677 $0.02 Equity Financing Fee (Unlevered Scenario) 10 years $--Total Acreage 0.00 acres/MW -- O&M Escalation 3.0%System Costs: ($ / W) General Property Insurance 0.30% 96,218 $0.01 Operating Security:System Cost $28,080,000 $2.60 Insurance Escalation 3.0% $-- Sales Tax 1,755,000 $0.16 Business Interuption Insurance 0.20% 7,682 $0.00 --Total System Cost $29,835,000 $2.76 Y Insurance Escalation 3.0% No Security Operating Security - LC included in D $--Substation Cost $10M/100MW -- $-- N Management -- $-- 6 month operating secOperating Security - LC Factor into D $1,920,542 EPC Price $29,835,000 $2.76 Management Escalation 3.0% 1 year operating security $3,841,085

Property Tax (YES or NO) NO 0.8% of Capital -- -- Initial Equity Investment (Unlevered Scenario):Development Costs: Land Rental Payment 0% of Rev -- -- Initial Equity Investment $24,241,600Permitting $-- $-- Land Rental Escalation 2% Equity Arrangement Fees --% --Interconnect Studies -- $-- Inverter Replacement -- -- Total Initial Equity Investment $24,241,600Feasibility Study -- $-- Transmission Charges --% -- $--Development Costs 2.0% 596,700 $0.06 Interconnection Charges -- -- Uses of Funds: Development Costs $596,700 $0.06 Other -- -- Total Project Cost $33,853,583

Cash Reserves for O&M & Repair Work 6 months 151,288Transaction Costs: Tax Assumptions: Working Capital --Land Purchase $0 per acre -- $-- Investment Incentives Debt Service Account 6 months 968,788Land Mitigation $0 per acre -- $-- Federal Incentives: USDA REAP Grant --Site Preparation $0 per acre -- $-- ITC (30% of project costs) 30.0% $9,363,271 State Investment Tax Credit (400,000)Title Insurance 0.3% 89,505 0.01 % ITC not Depreciable 50.0% 4,681,636 Federal Investment Tax Credit (9,363,271)Transaction Legal 50,000 0.00 Tax Depreciable Basis 28,171,947 Total Uses of Funds $25,210,388Builder's Risk Insurance 0.15% 44,753 0.00 5 yearsDev Security Deposit -- $-- 5 Yr MACRS Depreciable Basis Sources of Funds: Total Transaction Costs $184,258 $0.02 15 Yr MACRS Depreciable Basis Equity $7,563,116

State Incentives: Debt $17,647,271Financing Costs: State Tax Credit (YES or NO) - NO Total Sources of Funds $25,210,388Equity Placement - -% -- $-- State Rebates 400,000 Debt Placement - -% -- $-- Tax Depreciable Basis $23,490,311 NO Summary Financial Metrics:Other Financing Fees -- $-- Years Depreciable 1 years % Equity 30% Total Financing Cost $-- $-- % Debt 70%

USDA FundingTotal Project Costs: USDA REAP Grant (YES or NO) #### 25% - NO DSCREPC Price $29,835,000 $2.76 Max 2.03Development & Transaction Costs 780,958 0.07 Mean 1.78Construction Interest 2,237,625 0.21 Tax Rates: Min 1.53Financing Cost $-- $-- Federal Tax Rate 35.0%Gen-Tie & Utility Interconnect Line 1,000,000 0.09 State Tax Rate 9.5% Project IRR:Utility Interconnection Upgrade Payment -- $-- State Sales Tax 6.3% LEVERED: 20-yr IRR 30-yr IRRCredit for Power Sales pre COD -- $-- Pre-Tax IRR Total Project Costs $33,853,583 $3.13 After-Tax IRR

UNLEVERED:Pre-Tax IRRAfter-Tax IRR

Project NPV

No SecurityOperating Security - LC Factor into DSCR

5 Yr MACRS Depreciable Basis

North Kingstown 900 kW

Inputs & Outputs 1/1 Printed on: 5/3/2010

OptiSolar Inc. - PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECT MODEL (CALIFORNIA)

Project: Fall River Wind 10.8MWPro-Forma Financials Project model running: LEVERED CASE($ in US Dollars)

Date 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 12/31/14 12/31/15 12/31/16 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/19 12/31/20 12/31/21 12/31/22Years of Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11Capacity (MW AC) 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 Hours in Period 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760Annual Capacity Factor 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0%Output Degradation 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Energy Generated (kWh/yr) 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 Energy Loss from Line Loss (kWh/yr) 100.0% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Energy Generated (kWh/yr) - After Line Loss 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240

REVENUES:Cost per kWh $0.1450 $0.1450 $0.1450 $0.1238 $0.1269 $0.1301 $0.1334 $0.1367 $0.1401 $0.1436 $0.1472Revenues - Energy Sales $3,841,085 $3,841,085 $3,841,085 $3,280,615 $3,362,631 $3,446,697 $3,532,864 $3,621,186 $3,711,715 $3,804,508 $3,899,621Repayment of Interconnection Upgrade (+ Interest) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Total Revenues $3,841,085 $3,841,085 $3,841,085 $3,280,615 $3,362,631 $3,446,697 $3,532,864 $3,621,186 $3,711,715 $3,804,508 $3,899,621

OPERATING COSTS:Operating & Maintenance Cost 3.0% ($198,677) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637)General Property Insurance 3.0% (96,218) (99,104) (102,078) (105,140) (108,294) (111,543) (114,889) (118,336) (121,886) (125,543) (129,309)Business Interuption Insurance 3.0% (7,682) (7,913) (8,150) (8,395) (8,646) (8,906) (9,173) (9,448) (9,732) (10,023) (10,324)Management 3.0% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Property Tax 1.0% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Land Rental Payment 2.0% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Transmission Charges -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Interconnection Charges -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Other -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Operating Costs - Total ($302,577) ($311,654) ($314,865) ($318,171) ($321,578) ($325,086) ($328,699) ($332,421) ($336,255) ($340,203) ($344,270)

EBITDA $3,538,508 $3,529,431 $3,526,220 $2,962,444 $3,041,053 $3,121,611 $3,204,165 $3,288,765 $3,375,461 $3,464,305 $3,555,351 EBITDA Margin 92.1% 91.9% 91.8% 90.3% 90.4% 90.6% 90.7% 90.8% 90.9% 91.1% 91.2%

Depreciation Expense (Federal - Tax Purpose) (5,701,056) (9,081,690) (5,475,680) (3,312,075) (3,312,075) (1,689,371) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667)

EBIT ($2,162,548) ($5,552,259) ($1,949,460) ($349,631) ($271,022) $1,432,240 $3,137,498 $3,222,098 $3,308,794 $3,397,638 $3,488,684 EBIT Margin (56.3%) (144.5%) (50.8%) (10.7%) (8.1%) 41.6% 88.8% 89.0% 89.1% 89.3% 89.5%

Interest Expense (LT Debt) (1,235,309) (1,186,150) (1,133,551) (1,077,269) (1,017,047) (952,610) (883,663) (809,889) (730,951) (646,487) (556,111)Interest Expense (LC for Operating Security) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Interest Income (O&M Reserves & WC) 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782Amortization of Debt Financing Fees -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Amortization of Equity Financing Fees -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Profit before Tax (EBT) ($3,394,075) ($6,734,627) ($3,079,229) ($1,423,118) ($1,284,287) $483,412 $2,257,618 $2,415,991 $2,581,625 $2,754,933 $2,936,355 EBT Margin (88.4%) (175.3%) (80.2%) (43.4%) (38.2%) 14.0% 63.9% 66.7% 69.6% 72.4% 75.3%

Tax Expense - Federal 1,187,926 2,357,120 1,077,730 498,091 449,500 (169,194) (790,166) (845,597) (903,569) (964,227) (1,027,724)

Net Income ($2,206,149) ($4,377,508) ($2,001,499) ($925,026) ($834,786) $314,218 $1,467,451 $1,570,394 $1,678,057 $1,790,707 $1,908,631

Project Cashflow 1/9 Printed on: 5/3/2010


Date 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 12/31/14 12/31/15 12/31/16 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/19 12/31/20 12/31/21 12/31/22

LEVERED CASH FLOWPre-Tax:Profit before Tax (EBT) ($3,394,075) ($6,734,627) ($3,079,229) ($1,423,118) ($1,284,287) $483,412 $2,257,618 $2,415,991 $2,581,625 $2,754,933 $2,936,355+ Federal Depreciation 5,701,056 9,081,690 5,475,680 3,312,075 3,312,075 1,689,371 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667+ Amortization of Financing Fees -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- Less Principal Debt Payment (702,267) (751,425) (804,025) (860,307) (920,528) (984,965) (1,053,913) (1,127,687) (1,206,625) (1,291,088) (1,381,465)Cash Flow (Levered Pre-tax) $1,604,715 $1,595,637 $1,592,427 $1,028,651 $1,107,260 $1,187,818 $1,270,372 $1,354,971 $1,441,667 $1,530,512 $1,621,557

Investment Tax CreditInitial Equity ($7,563,116)Take-out Value (after-tax) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Pre-Tax Cash Flow ($7,563,116) $1,604,715 $1,595,637 $1,592,427 $1,028,651 $1,107,260 $1,187,818 $1,270,372 $1,354,971 $1,441,667 $1,530,512 $1,621,557

Cumulative IRR - Pre-Tax (30 Year)

Post-Tax:Net Income ($2,206,149) ($4,377,508) ($2,001,499) ($925,026) ($834,786) $314,218 $1,467,451 $1,570,394 $1,678,057 $1,790,707 $1,908,631- Tax Expense - State 2,018,750 (216,638) (221,330) (173,118) (186,307) (200,081) (214,474) (229,519) (245,254) (261,719) (278,954)+ Federal Depreciation 5,701,056 9,081,690 5,475,680 3,312,075 3,312,075 1,689,371 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667+ Amortization of Financing Fees -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- Less Principal Debt Payment (702,267) (751,425) (804,025) (860,307) (920,528) (984,965) (1,053,913) (1,127,687) (1,206,625) (1,291,088) (1,381,465)Cash Flow (Levered Post-tax) $4,811,391 $3,736,119 $2,448,827 $1,353,624 $1,370,454 $818,542 $265,732 $279,855 $292,844 $304,566 $314,879

Investment Tax CreditInitial Equity ($7,563,116)Take-out Value (after-tax) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --After-Tax Cash Flow ($7,563,116) $4,811,391 $3,736,119 $2,448,827 $1,353,624 $1,370,454 $818,542 $265,732 $279,855 $292,844 $304,566 $314,879

Cumulative IRR - After-Tax (30 Year)

UNLEVERED CASH FLOWPre-Tax:Profit before Tax (EBT) ($3,394,075) ($6,734,627) ($3,079,229) ($1,423,118) ($1,284,287) $483,412 $2,257,618 $2,415,991 $2,581,625 $2,754,933 $2,936,355+ Interest Expense (LT Debt) $1,235,309 $1,186,150 $1,133,551 $1,077,269 $1,017,047 $952,610 $883,663 $809,889 $730,951 $646,487 $556,111+ Federal Depreciation 5,701,056 9,081,690 5,475,680 3,312,075 3,312,075 1,689,371 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667Cash Flow (Unlevered Pre-tax) $3,542,290 $3,533,213 $3,530,002 $2,966,226 $3,044,836 $3,125,393 $3,207,947 $3,292,547 $3,379,243 $3,468,087 $3,559,133

Investment Tax CreditInitial Equity ($24,241,600)Take-out Value (after-tax) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Pre-Tax Cash Flow ($24,241,600) $3,542,290 $3,533,213 $3,530,002 $2,966,226 $3,044,836 $3,125,393 $3,207,947 $3,292,547 $3,379,243 $3,468,087 $3,559,133

Cumulative IRR - Pre-Tax (30 Year)

Post-Tax:Profit before Tax (EBT) ($3,394,075) ($6,734,627) ($3,079,229) ($1,423,118) ($1,284,287) $483,412 $2,257,618 $2,415,991 $2,581,625 $2,754,933 $2,936,355+ Interest Expense (LT Debt) $1,235,309 $1,186,150 $1,133,551 $1,077,269 $1,017,047 $952,610 $883,663 $809,889 $730,951 $646,487 $556,111- Tax Expense - Federal 755,568 1,941,967 680,987 121,047 93,534 (502,608) (1,099,448) (1,129,058) (1,159,402) (1,190,497) (1,222,363)- Tax Expense - State 1,901,395 (329,322) (329,017) (275,458) (282,926) (290,579) (298,422) (306,459) (314,695) (323,135) (331,784)+ Federal Depreciation 5,701,056 9,081,690 5,475,680 3,312,075 3,312,075 1,689,371 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667Cash Flow (Unlevered Post-tax) $6,199,254 $5,145,858 $3,881,973 $2,811,815 $2,855,443 $2,332,206 $1,810,077 $1,857,030 $1,905,146 $1,954,455 $2,004,985

Investment Tax CreditInitial Equity ($24,241,600)Take-out Value (after-tax) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --After-Tax Cash Flow ($24,241,600) $6,199,254 $5,145,858 $3,881,973 $2,811,815 $2,855,443 $2,332,206 $1,810,077 $1,857,030 $1,905,146 $1,954,455 $2,004,985

Cumulative IRR - After-Tax (30 Year)(85.7%) (48.6%) (30.1%) (19.7%) (12.2%) (7.8%) (5.2%) (3.0%) (1.2%) 0.2% 1.4%



Date 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 12/31/14 12/31/15 12/31/16 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/19 12/31/20 12/31/21 12/31/22

Depreciation Schedule (Book - Gentie costs):Depreciation Rate 15 yearsDepreciation Schedule $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667

Depreciation Schedule (Book - System costs):Depreciation Rate 20 yearsDepreciation Schedule $29,171,947 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597

Federal Tax Depreciation Schedule (MARC): 100.000%Depreciation Rate --% 20.0% 32.0% 19.2% 11.5% 11.5% 5.8%Federal Depreciation Schedule $29,171,947 5,634,389 9,015,023 5,409,014 3,245,408 3,245,408 1,622,704 -- -- -- -- --

State Tax Calculation:EBITDA $3,538,508 $3,529,431 $3,526,220 $2,962,444 $3,041,053 $3,121,611 $3,204,165 $3,288,765 $3,375,461 $3,464,305 $3,555,351Interest Expense (LT Debt) (1,235,309) (1,186,150) (1,133,551) (1,077,269) (1,017,047) (952,610) (883,663) (809,889) (730,951) (646,487) (556,111)Net Interest Expense (LC-Reserves) 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782Amortization of Debt Financing Fee (Levered) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Amortization of Equity Financing Fee (Levered) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --State Depreciation Expense (23,556,978) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) EBT (21,249,997) 2,280,396 2,329,785 1,822,291 1,961,122 2,106,116 2,257,618 2,415,991 2,581,625 2,754,933 2,936,355State Tax - Levered (2,018,750) 216,638 221,330 173,118 186,307 200,081 214,474 229,519 245,254 261,719 278,954State Tax - Unlevered (1,901,395) 329,322 329,017 275,458 282,926 290,579 298,422 306,459 314,695 323,135 331,784

LT Debt Schedule:Annual Payment ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576)Interest Payment (1,235,309) (1,186,150) (1,133,551) (1,077,269) (1,017,047) (952,610) (883,663) (809,889) (730,951) (646,487) (556,111)Pincipal Payment (702,267) (751,425) (804,025) (860,307) (920,528) (984,965) (1,053,913) (1,127,687) (1,206,625) (1,291,088) (1,381,465) Ending Principal Balance $17,647,271 $16,945,005 $16,193,580 $15,389,555 $14,529,248 $13,608,720 $12,623,755 $11,569,842 $10,442,155 $9,235,531 $7,944,442 $6,562,978

Letter of Credit Schedule:Annual Payment -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Interest Payment -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Pincipal Payment -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Ending Principal Balance $-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

DCSR - Total Debt 1.83 1.82 1.82 1.53 1.57 1.61 1.65 1.70 1.74 1.79 1.83Max 2.03Mean 1.78Min 1.53

Repayment of Interconnection Upgrade:Annual Repayment -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Interest Payment 7.5% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Total Repayment for Upgrade $-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Amortization of Financing Fees:Debt Financing Fee (Levered Scenario) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Equity Financing Fee (Levered Scenario) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Equity Financing Fee (Unlevered Scenario) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Price per Kwh (Year 21 - 30) Calculation:PPA Price (Year 1 - 20) 2.5% $0.1509 $0.1450 $0.1450 $0.1450 $0.1238 $0.1269 $0.1301 $0.1334 $0.1367 $0.1401 $0.1436 $0.1472PPA Price (Year 21 - 30) 2.5% $0.2111 $0.1150 $0.1179 $0.1208 $0.1238 $0.1269 $0.1301 $0.1334 $0.1367 $0.1401 $0.1436 $0.1472



INCOME STATEMENT

12/31/23 12/31/24 12/31/25 12/31/26 12/31/27 12/31/28 12/31/29 12/31/30 12/31/31 12/31/32 12/31/33 12/31/34 12/31/35 12/31/36 12/31/3712 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240

$0.1509 $0.1547 $0.1585 $0.1625 $0.1666 $0.1707 $0.1750 $0.1794 $0.1838 $0.1884 $0.1932 $0.1980 $0.2029 $0.2080 $0.2132$3,997,111 $4,097,039 $4,199,465 $4,304,452 $4,412,063 $4,522,365 $4,635,424 $4,751,309 $4,870,092 $4,991,844 $5,116,641 $5,244,557 $5,375,670 $5,510,062 $5,647,814

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --$3,997,111 $4,097,039 $4,199,465 $4,304,452 $4,412,063 $4,522,365 $4,635,424 $4,751,309 $4,870,092 $4,991,844 $5,116,641 $5,244,557 $5,375,670 $5,510,062 $5,647,814

($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637)(133,188) (137,184) (141,299) (145,538) (149,904) (154,401) (159,033) (163,804) (168,719) (173,780) (178,994) (184,363) (189,894) (195,591) (201,459)

(10,634) (10,953) (11,282) (11,620) (11,969) (12,328) (12,697) (13,078) (13,471) (13,875) (14,291) (14,720) (15,161) (15,616) (16,085)-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

($348,459) ($352,774) ($357,218) ($361,795) ($366,510) ($371,366) ($376,368) ($381,520) ($386,826) ($392,292) ($397,922) ($403,720) ($409,693) ($415,845) ($422,181)

$3,648,652 $3,744,265 $3,842,247 $3,942,657 $4,045,553 $4,150,998 $4,259,056 $4,369,789 $4,483,266 $4,599,552 $4,718,719 $4,840,836 $4,965,978 $5,094,218 $5,225,63391.3% 91.4% 91.5% 91.6% 91.7% 91.8% 91.9% 92.0% 92.1% 92.1% 92.2% 92.3% 92.4% 92.5% 92.5%

(66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

$3,581,986 $3,677,599 $3,775,581 $3,875,990 $4,045,553 $4,150,998 $4,259,056 $4,369,789 $4,483,266 $4,599,552 $4,718,719 $4,840,836 $4,965,978 $5,094,218 $5,225,63389.6% 89.8% 89.9% 90.0% 91.7% 91.8% 91.9% 92.0% 92.1% 92.1% 92.2% 92.3% 92.4% 92.5% 92.5%

(459,408) (355,937) (245,222) (126,757) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

$3,126,359 $3,325,444 $3,534,141 $3,753,015 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,41578.2% 81.2% 84.2% 87.2% 91.8% 91.9% 92.0% 92.0% 92.1% 92.2% 92.3% 92.4% 92.4% 92.5% 92.6%

(1,094,226) (1,163,905) (1,236,949) (1,313,555) (1,417,267) (1,454,173) (1,491,993) (1,530,750) (1,570,467) (1,611,167) (1,652,875) (1,695,616) (1,739,416) (1,784,300) (1,830,295)

$2,032,134 $2,161,539 $2,297,192 $2,439,460 $2,632,068 $2,700,607 $2,770,845 $2,842,822 $2,916,581 $2,992,167 $3,069,626 $3,149,002 $3,230,344 $3,313,700 $3,399,120



12/31/23 12/31/24 12/31/25 12/31/26 12/31/27 12/31/28 12/31/29 12/31/30 12/31/31 12/31/32 12/31/33 12/31/34 12/31/35 12/31/36 12/31/37

$3,126,359 $3,325,444 $3,534,141 $3,753,015 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,41566,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --(1,478,167) (1,581,639) (1,692,354) (1,810,818) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$1,714,859 $1,810,472 $1,908,454 $2,008,863 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,415

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --$1,714,859 $1,810,472 $1,908,454 $2,008,863 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,415

$2,032,134 $2,161,539 $2,297,192 $2,439,460 $2,632,068 $2,700,607 $2,770,845 $2,842,822 $2,916,581 $2,992,167 $3,069,626 $3,149,002 $3,230,344 $3,313,700 $3,399,120(297,004) (315,917) (335,743) (356,536) (384,687) (394,704) (404,970) (415,489) (426,270) (437,317) (448,638) (460,239) (472,127) (484,310) (496,794)

66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

(1,478,167) (1,581,639) (1,692,354) (1,810,818) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$323,629 $330,649 $335,761 $338,772 $2,247,381 $2,305,903 $2,365,875 $2,427,332 $2,490,312 $2,554,851 $2,620,988 $2,688,763 $2,758,217 $2,829,390 $2,902,325

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --$323,629 $330,649 $335,761 $338,772 $2,247,381 $2,305,903 $2,365,875 $2,427,332 $2,490,312 $2,554,851 $2,620,988 $2,688,763 $2,758,217 $2,829,390 $2,902,325

$3,126,359 $3,325,444 $3,534,141 $3,753,015 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,415$459,408 $355,937 $245,222 $126,757 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --$3,652,435 $3,748,048 $3,846,030 $3,946,439 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,415

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --$3,652,435 $3,748,048 $3,846,030 $3,946,439 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,415

$3,126,359 $3,325,444 $3,534,141 $3,753,015 $4,049,335 $4,154,781 $4,262,838 $4,373,572 $4,487,048 $4,603,334 $4,722,501 $4,844,618 $4,969,760 $5,098,000 $5,229,415$459,408 $355,937 $245,222 $126,757 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

(1,255,019) (1,288,483) (1,322,777) (1,357,920) (1,417,267) (1,454,173) (1,491,993) (1,530,750) (1,570,467) (1,611,167) (1,652,875) (1,695,616) (1,739,416) (1,784,300) (1,830,295)(340,648) (349,731) (359,039) (368,578) (384,687) (394,704) (404,970) (415,489) (426,270) (437,317) (448,638) (460,239) (472,127) (484,310) (496,794)

66,667 66,667 66,667 66,667 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --$2,056,768 $2,109,833 $2,164,213 $2,219,940 $2,247,381 $2,305,903 $2,365,875 $2,427,332 $2,490,312 $2,554,851 $2,620,988 $2,688,763 $2,758,217 $2,829,390 $2,902,325

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --$2,056,768 $2,109,833 $2,164,213 $2,219,940 $2,247,381 $2,305,903 $2,365,875 $2,427,332 $2,490,312 $2,554,851 $2,620,988 $2,688,763 $2,758,217 $2,829,390 $2,902,325

2.4% 3.1% 3.7% 6.2%



12/31/23 12/31/24 12/31/25 12/31/26 12/31/27 12/31/28 12/31/29 12/31/30 12/31/31 12/31/32 12/31/33 12/31/34 12/31/35 12/31/36 12/31/37SCHEDULES

$66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $66,667 $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $--

$1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $1,458,597 $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $--

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

$3,648,652 $3,744,265 $3,842,247 $3,942,657 $4,045,553 $4,150,998 $4,259,056 $4,369,789 $4,483,266 $4,599,552 $4,718,719 $4,840,836 $4,965,978 $5,094,218 $5,225,633(459,408) (355,937) (245,222) (126,757) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)

3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

(66,667) (66,667) (66,667) (66,667) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --3,126,359 3,325,444 3,534,141 3,753,015 4,049,335 4,154,781 4,262,838 4,373,572 4,487,048 4,603,334 4,722,501 4,844,618 4,969,760 5,098,000 5,229,415

297,004 315,917 335,743 356,536 384,687 394,704 404,970 415,489 426,270 437,317 448,638 460,239 472,127 484,310 496,794340,648 349,731 359,039 368,578 384,687 394,704 404,970 415,489 426,270 437,317 448,638 460,239 472,127 484,310 496,794

($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) ($1,937,576) $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $-- $--(459,408) (355,937) (245,222) (126,757) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)

(1,478,167) (1,581,639) (1,692,354) (1,810,818) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$5,084,811 $3,503,172 $1,810,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

1.88 1.93 1.98 2.03

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

$0.1509 $0.1547 $0.1585 $0.1625 $0.1666 $0.1707 $0.1750 $0.1794 $0.1838$0.1509 $0.1547 $0.1585 $0.1625 $0.1666 $0.1707 $0.1750 $0.1794 $0.1838 $0.1884 $0.1932 $0.1980 $0.2029 $0.2080 $0.2132



Last Updated 09/17/09

12/31/38 12/31/39 12/31/40 12/31/4127 28 29 30

10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80 8,760 8,760 8,760 8,760

28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240-- -- -- --

26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240 26,490,240

$0.2185 $0.2240 $0.2296 $0.2353$5,789,009 $5,933,734 $6,082,078 $6,234,130

-- -- -- --$5,789,009 $5,933,734 $6,082,078 $6,234,130

($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637) ($204,637)(207,503) (213,728) (220,140) (226,744)

(16,567) (17,064) (17,576) (18,104)-- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- --

($428,707) ($435,429) ($442,353) ($449,484)

$5,360,302 $5,498,305 $5,639,725 $5,784,64592.6% 92.7% 92.7% 92.8%

-- -- -- --

$5,360,302 $5,498,305 $5,639,725 $5,784,64592.6% 92.7% 92.7% 92.8%

(0) (0) (0) (0)-- -- -- --

3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782-- -- -- ---- -- -- --

$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,42792.7% 92.7% 92.8% 92.9%

(1,877,430) (1,925,731) (1,975,227) (2,025,950)

$3,486,655 $3,576,357 $3,668,280 $3,762,478



12/31/38 12/31/39 12/31/40 12/31/41

$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,427-- -- -- ---- -- -- --0 0 0 0

$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,427

-- -- -- --$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,427

$3,486,655 $3,576,357 $3,668,280 $3,762,478(509,588) (522,698) (536,133) (549,901)

-- -- -- ---- -- -- --0 0 0 0

$2,977,067 $3,053,659 $3,132,146 $3,212,577

-- -- -- --$2,977,067 $3,053,659 $3,132,146 $3,212,577

$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,427$0 $0 $0 $0-- -- -- --

$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,427

-- -- -- --$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,427

$5,364,084 $5,502,087 $5,643,507 $5,788,427$0 $0 $0 $0

(1,877,430) (1,925,731) (1,975,227) (2,025,950)(509,588) (522,698) (536,133) (549,901)

-- -- -- --$2,977,067 $3,053,659 $3,132,146 $3,212,577

-- -- -- --$2,977,067 $3,053,659 $3,132,146 $3,212,577



12/31/38 12/31/39 12/31/40 12/31/41

$-- $-- $-- $--

$-- $-- $-- $--

-- -- -- --

$5,360,302 $5,498,305 $5,639,725 $5,784,645(0) (0) (0) (0)

3,782 3,782 3,782 3,782-- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- --

5,364,084 5,502,087 5,643,507 5,788,427509,588 522,698 536,133 549,901509,588 522,698 536,133 549,901

$-- $-- $-- $--(0) (0) (0) (0)0 0 0 0

$0 $0 $0 $0

-- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- --

-- -- -- ---- -- -- ---- -- -- --

$0.2185 $0.2240 $0.2296 $0.2353



Organization Chart

Project Manager for TRCand Coordinator of Grant

Work

Project Manager for TRCProject Manager for TRCand Coordinator of Grant and Coordinator of Grant

WorkWork

H. Jeffrey BrandtTRC

H. Jeffrey BrandtTRC

Meteorological TowerMeteorological TowerMeteorological Tower

Jonathan MarkeyMeridian Associates

Jonathan MarkeyMeridian Associates

Wetlands Delineation and T&E Study

Wetlands Delineation and Wetlands Delineation and T&E StudyT&E Study

Galen Guerrero-MurphyTRC

Galen Guerrero-MurphyTRC

Communication ImpactStudy

Communication ImpactCommunication ImpactStudyStudy

Ben EvansEvans Associates

Ben EvansEvans Associates

Electrical Interconnection Feasibility Assessment

Electrical Interconnection Electrical Interconnection Feasibility AssessmentFeasibility Assessment

Kevin Fougere, PETRC

Kevin Fougere, PETRC

Wind ResourceAssessment

Wind ResourceWind ResourceAssessmentAssessment

Al KlausmannTRC

Al KlausmannTRC

Applicant and Manager of GrantApplicant and Manager of GrantApplicant and Manager of Grant

Applicant: William FlanaganManager of Grant Work: Ken Fiola

Applicant: William FlanaganManager of Grant Work: Ken Fiola

Principal-in-Charge for TRCPrincipalPrincipal--inin--Charge for TRCCharge for TRC

John DeVillarsTRC

John DeVillarsTRC


TRC Qualifications

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

� � � � � � � �

��

��

�� ! �� "��#��$%�� &�'((� �� )�� )�� *�� +�,�� ! �� -��

��#�� ./0( �� #�� )��

��

��

� �� !

� "#��$�� %��&�� $�� ''(�$�� )#� �#��$�*��+�� !

�� ! �� "��#�� !��"��!��

� �� ,� ��&�� $ � �� #�� -��.�� $��$$�� /� � �� 0�� !

� � �� #��#�� $��#� ��1� �� #�� #�� !

$�$��$��#�#� ��#�� !�� ! ��

� ��#�� #�� 2��#�� 2�� 2�� 2�� !

� � ��#� � ��2�� $��1 2�� $#�� $�� 2��2�� #��2� � ��2�� 3#� � ��!

�� 2�� 2�� 2�� 4� � � �� $�� !��5#�� #��/#��0� �� 2�� 2�� #��2�� #�� !

��

��

��

��

�

��

�

��

�

��

��

��

��

��

��

!��"�

��

��

!��"�

��

��

��

��

#��$�$

��

!%�%&�'%

�� !��" �

#� �$�%��

& ��'��

��(�� ) �

�*�+�� * �� ,� �

��"!%

��*� ��' ��

��-(�� )� �

"!�"��

��. ��/��'�� ")��

�� )� �

��&$

-��01��2�" �

%��

-(��'�3�*�� !" �

/��4��&�� * ��

"'��%

3 �'�� (�'� 5"� ��

!��"(%&�"�

� ��#��6��+� ��

6� �� )� �

�'� '�� "� �

��

��

��

�

��

�

��

��

�

��

�

��

��

�

$%)��'�#%��'�%&��'�#%��

��/� �� ) � �

��

��

�

��

��

��

�

��

��

�

��

��

�� )� �

��

��

�

��

�

�

��

��

��

��

��

�

��

��

��

��

�

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

�

�

��

��

��

��

�

��

��

�

��

��

��

��

�

��

��

��

��

��

��

�

��

��

��

��

��

��

�

��

��

�

�

�� %&#��*��7�� )�� (+�� (�� )� �&�+��' �� 2��" �/�� &813�� "�� /��9�� :�� *��+�� !)� �& ��'�� *�� :�" �� !2�" �� )� ��+(�� ) ��+'��'�� 6��+� �): �� "�0,� ��6+�3�*0 (�9�� 5� �/�� (�.� )� ��'��4�� ,�, �1��.��#��+�� 5 �1�'4 �� : �;�� )� �-��' �� 2�5" � ��'�� :� �&��3��+�� 5:�: ��*��0��4�� )" ��#�� !, � ��.��9�� )): �

��

��

��

�� &�%'�"$��'

�<�<&;� &81

��

�

�$$�!�)$��$� �� !� ��*��6��+� 5,� �� .�� !�� = ��(�� &81��+��(��4 ��661 &81

��*$�"&

#��*��)5 �

��

�

��

��

�$� �

�"��+� �� :� �/��9��+�� 5) ��+'�� 5� � �� 5) �%..�� !) �%..��6>*�� 5" �� ,� �� 5�0"� �

��

��

�

�

��

�$$� ��*��

�

#

�!) �� 5" �,� �

�0"� �

� �

��

��$

��

��'�� "�" �

/(44�� 3�*�� !"! �

�+'��

��'��< ��

�?�@��

�� "�" �

/��A ��' ��,� �

"%��

�� )� �

"��"�%"$

�� " �

�*�+�� )��

��$$

/(44�� (��): ��6��+��

�$��+"&�"�"�#�(�� (�� )" �3��3�*�� !�� &�� 52 �� 2� �

"��"�%"$ ��

+&%��;��4�� 5" �3��.�� (�� 52�" �#��6B( >�� : �6��9�� 2" �

� %"��

/��+��/(�� )��

�'�� (��6��+� "��

��

& ��'�� "�0,� �

� ��9��* �� "� �

� ��6��+��"��

C�� (��* �� 55 �

#.��# ��*��(�.��;�� )�" �

*��$ �+��"�1�� (��6��+� �� >��6��+� �!� �#�(��6��+� 2��" �

��

�

��%..�� %..��6>*��

�%&��!�&%�"��

;(��6��+��@44�' ��.��(�� ) �

�

�

%(($�%&��"!�!%�$�

��(��(�� (��(��&81

�&!��!��

#

"�,��!��-�.��.��

�"�,��!�

*��,��

�� )�� 6�� # �� )�� -�� )�� *�� :

'�� '�(�� ')�� ,�� 2�� 1�� 6�� -��

��*��+� �� 1��,�� 7��1��2��;712�<�� 1��,�� #��2�� 6�� 2��

*��,��

��"��*��!( '�)��'� -�� 4�� ;��<

� � �� 7�� =� �� ,��#�� ,��-��2��2��2�� 2� � �� *�� )��

��+��+ , ��'�+�� 9�� ,� �� 2�� >� ��

�)� ��(�+�� 2�� 1��,�� 2�� "��

��)�� #��

PROJECT PROFILE

www.trcsolutions.com

Project Location:Franklin County, Maine

Completion Date:Ongoing

Photo Captions: (Top) After unanimous approval by Maine’s Land Use Regulation Commission, construction began in September 2008.(Middle) The project will create up to 250 jobs during the 26 month construction.(Bottom) 44 three MW turbines will provide 132 MW of electricity to 50,000 Maine homes

Project Challenges

As New England’s largest wind farm to date, the Kibby Mountain wind farm’s 44 turbines will provide 132 megawatts (MW) of clean power for over 50,000 Maine homes, but local constituents opposed its development.

TRC Solutions

TRC conducted extensive fi eld studies of the site for the proposed Kibby • Wind Power Project in Franklin County, Maine, including the wind turbine generator sites and the proposed transmission line. TRC’s site reviews weaved a path through numerous recreational, development, visual, and natural resource issues.

In addition to providing permitting support, TRC’s electrical engineers are • serving as the owner’s engineer for collector system design and transmission line construction, and have provided design engineering services for the 27 miles of transmission line that will connect the project to the New England grid.

Client Benefi ts:

Lending an ear to all interested parties, TRC helped the client successfully • address controversial issues and diffuse tensions.

The development plan met with unanimous fi nal approval by Maine’s Land • Use Regulation Commission in July 2008, and construction of the facility began in September 2008

Twenty two (22) turbines were completed in October 2009 with the • remaining 22 turbines anticipated to be in service by October 2010.

TransCanada Kibby Mountain Wind Power Project

PROJECT PROFILE

www.trcsolutions.com

Project Location:Nantucket Sound, MA

Completion Date:Ongoing

Photo Captions: (Top) Proposed Cape Wind Energy Project wind turbine layout in Nantucket Sound.(Middle) Representative photograph of an offshore wind project, located much closer to shore than would be the Cape Wind Energy Project turbines. (Bottom) New England wind resource map showing the high values for offshore locations

Project Challenges

Providing NEPA Environmental Impact Statement preparation support for North America’s fi rst proposed offshore wind farm on Horseshoe Shoal off of Cape Cod in Nantucket Sound, Massachusetts.

This is the fi rst and only offshore wind energy project in the U.S. to have progressed so far in the environmental review and permitting process. Miles from the nearest shore, the proposed wind farm will consist of 130 wind turbines harnessing the wind to produce up to 454 MW of clean, renewable energy, enough to provide three quarters of Cape Cod’s and the Islands electricity needs.

TRC Solutions

Provided support, while under NEPA review by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, • in the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and when the Energy Policy Act of 2005 switched the NEPA review jurisdiction to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service (MMS), continued to successfully prepare a new Draft EIS.

Provided critical support to MMS as they worked their way through NEPA in • the absence of new regulations for their Offshore Renewable Energy Program. Involved heavily in determining how to prepare an EIS that is compliant with NEPA, for this fi rst of its kind project.

Organized public hearings, coordinated over 42,000 comment documents • received during the comment period, and successfully revised the Draft EIS into a Final EIS.

Completed the 2,800-page FEIS detailing impacts the wind farm would have • on more than 25 environmental and societal resources including for example, historic properties, marine life, water and air quality, birds, navigation, aesthetics, and recreation and tourism.

Cape Wind Associates and U.S. Department of the Interior - Minerals Management Service, Cape Wind Energy Project EIS


Meridian Proposal

152 Conant Street Beverly, Massachusetts 01915 P: (978) 299-0447 F: (978) 299-0567

69 Milk Street, Suite 302 Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 P: (508) 871-7030 F: (508) 871-7039

200 Lake Drive East, Suite 204 Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002 P: (856) 414-1500 F: (856) 414-1506

www.meridianassoc.com

VIA: EMAIL [email protected] April 7, 2010 Mr. Jeff Brandt TRC Environmental Corporation 650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854 Re: Met Tower Installation for Fall River Dear Mr. Brandt We are pleased to submit this proposal for Renewable Energy services relative to the above referenced project. Meridian Associates, Inc., “MAI”, proposes to provide to TRC “the Client”, the following specific services: PROJECT OBJECTIVE: Provide TRC with the Installation of Wind Data Collection

Equipment, for the Fall River wind project. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

1.0 WIND DATA COLLECTION:

1.1 Obtain building permit for installation and erection of 50m guyed Met tower. 1.2 Prepare Notice of Proposed Alteration with FAA for erection of 50m MET Tower. 1.3 Install and configure owner furnished 50m meteorological tower consisting of

Anemometers, Wind Vane and data collector. (Site access and clearing of vegetation are not believed to be necessary and therefore, not included in this price. MAI will help coordinate site clearing efforts-if necessary.)

1.4 Manage and collect wind data for a minimum period of twelve (12) months, maximum eighteen (18) months. Quarterly download of data, tower inspection, and maintenance are included during this period.

1.5 Decommission tower after wind data collection and remove tower and anchors

from property.

1.6 Provide client with monthly downloads of average wind speed and raw data (It shall be the responsibility of the client to download the data from the tower at two week intervals).

2.0 ADDITIONAL OPTIONS FOR WIND DATA COLLECTION 2.1 Daily download of raw data from the tower will be provided to the client.

2.2 Lease for 50m met tower.

2.3 Clearing of vegetation for tower area (vegetation will be cut, de-limbed, and

stacked on site in lengths of 20’. Removal of cut vegetation stumps is not a part of this estimate.

G:\ADMIN\Proposal\2010\April\TRC.doc 2

2.4 Roadway improvements (access drive) for delivery of equipment to the site.

Meridian Associates, Inc. proposes to begin the services identified above upon receipt of a retainer and written authorization to proceed. The services described shall be initiated by June 2010. The estimated time to complete the services is subject to change due to unforeseen circumstances and/or inclement weather. We have provided a lump sum fee, exclusive of all direct expenses for the services described above. Item 1.0 Wind Data Collection $20,000.00 Item 2.1 Daily Downloads $7,000.00 Item 2.2 Tower Lease $600/month Item 2.3 Vegetation Clearing $2,000 Item 2.4 Access Road Improvements $3,000 These services shall be provided on an hourly basis consistent with the attached Standard Fee Schedule. MAI shall inform the Client as soon as possible if it becomes necessary to exceed the budget in order to perform the scope of services described above. Payment is due within fifteen (15) days from receipt of invoices. Final payment is due upon completion of the scope of services. Failure to comply with the payment schedule shall be cause for MAI to terminate services. MAI may provide, at the request of the Client, additional services such as but not limited to:

• CREBS Application preparation • Wind feasibility studies; • Solar feasibility studies; • Construction specifications and documentation; • Land surveying services; • Civil engineering services; and • any services not specifically stated in the scope of services.

These services are not included in the scope of services and will be invoiced in accordance with the attached Standard Fee Schedule. The attached Terms and Conditions are considered to be a part of this proposal. The cost estimate is only valid for forty-five (45) calendar days from the date of the proposal. Representations made by MAI are solely our expressed professional opinion and no warranties nor guarantees are implied for the above-described services. MAI is not responsible for means, methods, materials or supervision of construction activities. Please execute this proposal by either electronically signing and emailing back to our office, or print, sign and return a copy to our office with an original signature for our records. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

This instrument, together with any proposals, plans, specifications or appendices referred to herein, constitutes the entire agreement between both parties hereto. Meridian Associates, Inc. is referred to herein as "MAI".


1. Services to be Provided MAI agrees to provide the Client with the services described in the proposal in a responsible, professional manner consistent with the Client's expressed intentions.

2. Billing and Payment The Client agrees to pay MAI in accordance with the rates and charges based on the attached Standard Fee Schedule. Hourly fee rates are based on specific individuals assigned to the project and may be subject to periodic changes. Rates will be adjusted to reflect Invoices for MAI's services and shall be submitted either upon completion of such services or on a monthly basis. All such invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt. The Client acknowledges and agrees that in the event payment is not timely made, the overdue balance shall bear interest at 18% annually (1.5% monthly). It is further understood and agreed that if there be failure by the Client to pay any invoice within the time period stated in the Proposal, MAI may terminate its services. In the event MAI places any unpaid invoice with an agency or an attorney for collection, the Client agrees to pay all costs and expenses of such collection, including without limitation all reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. In event the account is not paid MAI may, after notice to the Client, retain the title to and use of all MAI work products, until such time as the account is paid in full. Following full payment of services, the Client is entitled to final products, excluding field notes, research documents, calculations, digital copies and file data used in the assembly and production of the service product. MAI’s instruments of service, which include drawings, specifications and other documents prepared by MAI, are for use solely with respect to this project, and unless otherwise provided, MAI shall be deemed the author and owner of these documents and shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including copyrights.

3. Right of Entry The Client hereby warrants, if the Site is not owned by the Client, that permission has been granted for a Right of Entry from time to time, by MAI, its agents and staff for the purpose of performing all services described in the attached Proposal. The Client hereby recognizes that the use of exploration equipment may unavoidably affect, alter or damage the terrain and affect vegetation, buildings, structures and equipment on the Site. The Client will not hold MAI liable or responsible for any alteration or damage and will defend MAI and indemnify it for damage claimed by any party.

4. Public Liability MAI represents that its staff is protected by Worker's Compensation insurance with statutory limits and that MAI has coverage under Public Liability and Property Damage insurance policies. Certificates for any such policies shall be provided to the Client upon written request. In no event shall MAI be liable or responsible for any loss or damage beyond the amounts, limits or conditions of such insurance. MAI will not be liable for damages or injury arising from damage to or interference with underground structures (including, but not limited to, pipes, tanks, telephone cables, etc.).

5. Limitations The Client agrees that MAI's professional services are on behalf of and for the exclusive use of the Client. The Client recognizes that MAI's services require decisions which are not based upon pure science but rather upon judgmental considerations. MAI shall perform services in accordance with generally accepted practices of like professionals undertaking similar services. The Client agrees that such services shall be rendered without any warranty, expressed or implied, and subject to all other limitations herein contained. MAI shall be responsible only for such injury, loss or damage as is caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of MAI, its employees, agents or representatives.


6. Notification of Hazards The Client agrees to advise MAI promptly of any known hazardous substances or any known condition existing in, on, or near the site presenting a potential damage to human health or the environment.

7. Unforeseen Circumstances If, during performance of services, any unforeseen circumstances are encountered which, in the judgment of MAI, affect or may affect the scope of services, MAI will promptly notify the Client. Subsequent to that notification the Client and MAI agree to pursue one of the following options:

(a) MAI will complete the original scope of services in accordance with the original Proposal. (b) The scope of services and estimate will be modified to include the previously unforeseen circumstances. (c) The services will be terminated effective on the date specified by MAI in writing. The Client agrees to pay MAI in full for all services completed and fees up to and including the date specified in writing. 8. Hazardous Waste The Client agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify MAI from and against any and all claims and liabilities from:

(a) The Client's violation of any federal, state, or local statute, regulation or ordinance relating to the disposal of hazardous waste. (b) The Client's direct or indirect undertaking of or arrangement for the treatment, storage, disposal or transportation of hazardous materials or oil found or identified at the Site. 9. Notification to Public Authorities MAI does not assume the responsibility of the person in charge of the Site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting to any federal, state, or local public agencies any conditions the Site that may present a potential danger to public health, safety or the environment.

10. OSHA MAI will not be held responsible in any way for the Client's failure to observe or comply with the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970, any regulations or standards promulgated thereunder, or any state, county, or municipal law or regulation of similar intent.

11. Additional Services Additional services may be requested by the Client or the Client's agent and shall be invoiced in accordance with the attached Standard Fee Schedule.

12. Compensation for Completed Services If the above-described services are discontinued for any reason after the execution of the agreement, all services performed to date shall be compensated at the rates set forth in the Fee Schedule of the Proposal.


13. Digital Documents Digital information collected or developed during the course of a project is the property of MAI. At the sole discretion of MAI, a digital document may be provided for use only by the Client, for the sole purpose for which the document was originally prepared for. The official copy of the document is the hard copy (paper copy) and the Client is responsible for comparing the hard copy with the digital copy for any and all differences and/or discrepancies. If any differences and/or discrepancies are found, the Client shall notify MAI so that a determination can be made as to the most accurate information to use.

14. Severability In the event that any provisions of this agreement shall be deemed invalid or unenforceable, the other provisions herein shall remain in full force and effect and binding upon both parties.

Please indicate below which phase(s) of the project you are accepting at this time and are hereby authorizing us to proceed with:

Phase 1 Wind Data Collection

Phase 2.1 Daily Download of Data

Phase 2.2 12 Month Tower Lease

Phase 2.3 Vegetation Clearing

Phase 2.4 Access Road Improvements

Phases not accepted at this time may be added to the scope of the work at a later date by the mutual agreement of the parties. Sincerely, MERIDIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Jonathan J. Markey, P.E. Senior Project Manager

Authorized Signature

Title

Date

Please provide email address for billing purposes.





2010 STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE

CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE

Principal $150.00

Senior Project Manager $100.00-150.00

Senior Project Engineer $85.00-90.00

Senior Project Surveyor $95.00-105.00

Project Engineer/Surveyor/Landscape Architect $80.00-90.00

Engineer/Survey/CADD Technician $65.00-85.00

Technical Administrator $50.00

Two (2) Person Survey/Scan Crew $135.00

Two (2) Person (Environmental Level D PPE) $150.00

Three (3) Person Survey/Scan Crew $165.00

Three (3) Person (Environmental Level D PPE) $175.00

Expert Witness Testimony $250.00

Two (2) Person Survey/Scan Crew (Prevailing Wage) $185.00

Two (2) Person Survey GPS Crew $140.00

One (1) Person Survey GPS Crew/Robotic Crew $115.00

One (1) Person Survey GPS Crew/Robotic Crew (Prevailing Wage) $135.00

Laser Scan/Survey Crew (Industrial) – Two (2) Person $155.00

Laser Scan/Survey Crew (Industrial) – Three (3) Person $220.00

Laser Scan/Survey Crew (Scan Station) – Two (2) Person $400.00

3D Data Post Processing and Analysis $100.00 - $125.00

EXPENSES Direct expenses shall be billed at cost plus a service fee of 15%. Direct expenses shall include transportation, delivery, long distance telephone calls, job supplies, printing costs, consultants, and similar costs directly applicable to each job. G:\ADMIN\Proposal\2010\Fee Schedule 2010-email.doc


Meridian Qualifications

“A green, renewable energy economy

isn’t some pie-in-the-sky, far-off future –

it is now. It is creating jobs –

now. It is providing cheap

alternatives to oil – now.

And it can create millions

of additional jobs,

an entire new industry,

if we act – now.” — President Barack Obama

Beverly, MA152 Conant StreetBeverly, MA 01915Toll Free: 800-466-5505T 978-299-0447F [email protected]

Westborough, MA69 Milk Street, Suite 302Westborough, MA 01581T 508-871-7030F [email protected]

Cherry Hill, NJWoodland Falls Corporate Park200 Lake Drive East, Suite 204Cherry Hill, NJ 08002T 856-414-1500F [email protected]

Houston, TX14520 Old Katy Road, Suite 125Houston, TX 77079T 281-905-0396F [email protected]

w w w . m e r i d i a n a s s o c . c o m

Meridian Project in Newburyport, Massachusetts

Let us help you

wind power potentialachieve your

Feasibility studies - Site planningProject management - Conflict resolution

Permit acqusition - Measurement and analysis

“Two years ago, we sought to explore wind technology in order to minimize existing energy costs and its impact on the environment. From the very beginning of the project, when the wind resource assessment was prepared and feasibility study initiated, Meridian’s knowledge and professionalism in the permitting process and in giving detailed public presentations added tremendous value to the effort. Meridian managed a very complex project from start to finish handling a variety of challenges and keeping us on target to the project’s completion. .”

—Mark Richey,President, Mark Richey Woodworking

Responsible Leadership for a Sustainable Future

renewablefreelimitless

everywhere

Wind Energy Division

Wind power is the future

Client testimonial: • Wind Data Measurement and Analysis• Permit Acquisition• Project Management• Site Planning and Design• Feasibility Studies• Post Construction Evaluation and Monitoring

Let us take you thereclean





VIA: EMAIL [email protected] April 20, 2010 Mr. H. Jeffery Brandt TRC 650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854 Re: Met Tower Installation for Copicut Hill, Fall River, MA. Dear Mr. Brandt: You will find that our firm offers a unique, non-traditional combination of services that is custom fit for the development of large scale wind turbines. Our history of civil site development provides a 20 year history of the acquisition of regulatory permits and large scale projects. In combination of our expertise in the measurement of wind resources, interpretive analysis using sophisticated, proven software to model production and output as well as our current knowledge of turbine options and reliability serve our clients extremely well throughout the design and construction phases. Our contacts throughout the industry as well as regulatory agencies will assist in the evaluation of funding and grant opportunities to further enhance the economic return on this project. We also maintain a wide spectrum of sub-consultants should there be need to address changing conditions or support the successful completion of this project. As an Energy Star Service Provider and an EPA Green Power Partner, our firm has been recognized as a leader in the development of renewable energy. Our purchase of Renewable Energy Credits from the New England Wind Fund to offset our electric consumption financially supports the development of electricity from clean renewable sources such as this project. Meridian Associates has provided numerous clients with successful grant applications such as $40,000 for the City of Beverly, $450,000 for Mark Richey Woodworking, $40,000 for the Town of Hamilton, and $1.6M in Clean Renewable Energy Bonds for the Town of Ipswich. Please review the attached materials to acquaint yourself with our services. Please call with any questions or if you would like additional materials. I look forward to meeting with you to discuss the project in further detail at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, MERIDIAN ASSOCIATES, INC.

Jonathan Markey, PE Senior Project Manager

How can we ensure sustainable growth into the future?

By switching to wind power.Meridian Associates is proud to lead the implementation and adoption of new technologies that provide economic, social and environmental benefits. In fact, this brochure has been produced with electricity entirely generated by wind power. Meridian Associates has an outstanding record of helping organizations like yours acheive these benefits. With Meridian’s expertise and guidance, you too can realize the full potential of wind power with fewer challenges and at lower cost than you may imagine.

How will wind energy benefit you?

Why should you partner with Meridian for your renewable energy needs?Because we’re the right fit. We excel at minimizing time delays and resolving conflicts that can arise during the regulatory review process. We put our experience, agility and creative design solutions to work for you. At Meridian Associates, our commitment to the environment is emphasized by our corporate social responsibility. We believe our commitment is mirrored by yours. Together, we can achieve combined economic, social and environmental success.

What are you looking for?We’ve got the solution. Let us help you...

Define a wind energy system that meets your needs Evaluate economic viability for projects using state and federal incentives Provide project leadership and management Capture real-time performance monitoring and reporting Monitor your new turbine’s production

Partner with Meridian

Meridian provides:

Wind Sensors

ControllerDisc Brake

Gear Box

Blade

BearingPitch Actuator

Hub Cover

Hydraulic Unit

Tower

Transformer

Nacelle Cover Generator

Quality service and market expertise

Wind is everywhere - so are weExpertise to deliver From US Dept. of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Global installed capacity is increasing annually

Meg

awat

ts

Data from World Wind Energy Association

Meridian possesses the experience and resources required to support your project from con-ception to implementation. From the installation of meteorological towers and anemometers for the collection of wind data, to the application of industry-recognized software products to measure, correlate and predict wind turbine production and economic return; together, with our knowledge of domestic and foreign wind turbine technologies, Meridian is well equipped to help you find a wind solution that best suits your application.

Produces clean, renewable energy Offers a hedge strategy against rising electricity costs Reduces environmental impact and offsets greenhouse gas emissions Demonstrates a commitment to the environment to stakeholders, customers and the community Incentives at the state and federal level reduce the financial investment required and improve the

rate of return for wind projects

Wind data measurement and analysis Technical and financial feasibility studies Identification of government incentives and financing opportunities Site planning and design Local, state and federal permit acquisition Construction phase services

www.meridianassoc.com(800) 466-5505

tomorrow’s energy today

“I cannot say enough about your commitment to our community and to the overall “big picture” of being stewards of the environment as we move forward with our wind turbine project. Without your leadership, dedication and commitment, we would not be where we are today, and would never have been able to reach our shared vision.”

—Richard Korb, Superintendent of Schools, Ipswich, MA

Meteorological Tower

“A green, renewable energy economy

isn’t some pie-in-the-sky, far-off future –

it is now. It is creating jobs –

now. It is providing cheap

alternatives to oil – now.

And it can create millions

of additional jobs,

an entire new industry,

if we act – now.” — President Barack Obama

Beverly, MA152 Conant StreetBeverly, MA 01915Toll Free: 800-466-5505T 978-299-0447F [email protected]

Westborough, MA69 Milk Street, Suite 302Westborough, MA 01581T 508-871-7030F [email protected]

Cherry Hill, NJWoodland Falls Corporate Park200 Lake Drive East, Suite 204Cherry Hill, NJ 08002T 856-414-1500F [email protected]

Houston, TX14520 Old Katy Road, Suite 125Houston, TX 77079T 281-905-0396F [email protected]

w w w . m e r i d i a n a s s o c . c o m

Meridian Project in Newburyport, Massachusetts

Let us help you

wind power potentialachieve your

Feasibility studies - Site planningProject management - Conflict resolution

Permit acqusition - Measurement and analysis

“Two years ago, we sought to explore wind technology in order to minimize existing energy costs and its impact on the environment. From the very beginning of the project, when the wind resource assessment was prepared and feasibility study initiated, Meridian’s knowledge and professionalism in the permitting process and in giving detailed public presentations added tremendous value to the effort. Meridian managed a very complex project from start to finish handling a variety of challenges and keeping us on target to the project’s completion. .”

—Mark Richey,President, Mark Richey Woodworking

Responsible Leadership for a Sustainable Future

renewablefreelimitless

everywhere

Wind Energy Division

Wind power is the future

Client testimonial: • Wind Data Measurement and Analysis• Permit Acquisition• Project Management• Site Planning and Design• Feasibility Studies• Post Construction Evaluation and Monitoring

Let us take you thereclean

COMPANY BACKGROUND Meridian Associates, Inc. is a multi‐disciplinary consulting firm offering civil engineering, landscape architecture, land surveying, renewable energy and sustainability consulting services. We provide land development and infrastructure consulting services to a wide range of public, corporate, commercial, industrial, and institutional clients. These services encompass the complete development process f r o m i n i t i a l

programming studies, feasibility analysis, technical due‐diligence, land planning, site and infrastructure design, permitting, construction layout to final compliance certification. Meridian seeks to provide clients with technical infrastructure, land development and energy projects helping them to succeed f inancia l ly , environmentally and socially responsibly. Founded in 1990, the firm is headquartered in Beverly, MA with regional offices in Westborough, MA, Cherry Hill, NJ. and Houston, TX.

STAFF & KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL Meridian’s staff includes professional land surveyors, professional civil engineers, registered landscape architects, laser scanning professionals, sustainability experts and Leadership LEED Accredited Professionals. Since its founding, Meridian has grown to a current staff of approximately 40. We recognize that our staff represents our most valuable resource and we pride ourselves on the long‐term commitment many have made to the firm.

Retaining experienced, licensed professionals with a proven background in their given area of expertise in order to offer their depth of experience to clients is a hallmark of the firm. Senior professionals mentor younger staff members, nurturing innate talent, refining skills, and providing hands‐on education, so that each generation of profes‐sionals becomes sensitive to the firm’s focus on quality of service, excellence of execution, and the significance of the human aspect of development.

"At this firm, we don't focus on what can't be accomplished, but rather on what we can accomplish. Almost every impediment may be overcome with purpose and per‐sistence. The solutions based determina‐tion of our staff, advanced technology, and working relationships with consultants in a variety of related fields permit this firm to overcome adversity."

Donald E. Bowen, Principal

M E R I D I A N A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

In the end, by investing in our own staff, building a rapport with civic agents, and developing strong relationships with clients, Meridian has recognized the less quantifiable aspect of a success‐ful civil engineer‐ing, surveying and landscape architec‐ture practice. The common denomi‐nator is people. Talented staff and strong relation‐ships are the un‐

paralleled resources that set Meridian apart from its peers. Meridian leverages a small‐firm business culture, with free flowing support between different disciplines, to create effective teams that can quickly and efficiently capitalize on the opportunities that define each project. Surveyors, site engineers and landscape architects work cooperatively and with equal concern, providing thorough communication between in‐house project staff and other project professionals, as the project proceeds from planning and design through the approval process, construction and occupancy. The breadth of personnel across the technical specialties affords us the ability to staff project requirements as they come about. Individual projects and assignments are managed and staffed by personnel with relevant credentials and experience.

Civil Engineers

Landscape Architects

Engineering/CADD Technicians Surveyors

Survey / Scanning Technicians

Sustainability Consultants

Technical / Administrative Support

Interns

THE MERIDIAN TEAM

Discipline Number of Staff

14 2

4 5 6 1 6 2

Registered Professionals

8 2 N/A 2 N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Total 40* 12

*Note: Includes 5 LEED Accredited Professionals


RENEWABLE ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY CONSULTING SERVICES

Sustainability is generally defined as meeting human needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. With increased public awareness of Global Warming, organizations and governments are focused on efforts to reverse the impact of human activity on the environment using various strategies to mitigate carbon emissions.

The advantage will be with those organizations and communities that develop and take proactive steps to counter both the

inevitable rise in fossil fuels prices and the new regulatory framework that will place a price on carbon emissions.

As a multi‐disciplinary engineering and consulting firm, Meridian Associates and its consulting division, Sustainnovation, are proud to help their clients realize the economic, social, and environmental benefits of sustainable practices.

Renewable Energy & Sustainability Consulting

• Solar & Wind Feasibility studies

• Grant proposals and financing • Permitting, planning and

design • Construction services • LEED assessment and

coordination • Water & energy efficiency and

conservation • Waste cost reduction & Zero

waste services • Education and training • Sustainability policy

development

We are both a committed participant and an appreciative neighbor, invested in the successful outcome of projects that make any small effort toward a more sustainable world. Our firm will develop a strategy that seeks to fulfill and exceed expectations. Industry knowledge, preparatory work, solution based designs, shared passion and advocacy will yield successful achievement of our shared goals.

Our project teams are committed to providing quality analysis and site designs, while meeting tight deadlines and watching our client’s bottom line. The professionals at Meridian Associates and Sustainnovation bring together exhaustive training in holistic site design techniques and strategies with practical implementation practices. In conservation and “green project” efforts, we have demonstrated a proven history in the implementation of environmentally friendly materials coupled with practices and vendors who share our initiative in this realm. This is reflected in the training of our staff for sustainable development.


We also introduce green design practices into standard site design objectives when cost savings or a regulatory requirements need to be satisfied. Our ability to resolve conflicting interests that can arise during the regulatory review process minimizes time delays and the potential by reviewing authorities or appeal by third parties. Nimble, intuitive design solutions combined with seasoned experience in the acquisition of regulatory permits contribute significantly toward the success of our firm and clients.

Mark Richey Woodworking Newburyport, MA


Energy Efficiency in buildings and homes is a goal that every one of us can achieve. Utilities and the local, state and federal government are providing builders, designers, and homeowners with grant and rebate incentives to increase energy efficiency in every new building and home.

$100,000 in energy efficiency grants and rebates for a 48 unit multifamily development. $1.6 million in Clean Renewable Energy Bond funds for a municipal wind project. $50,000 in energy efficiency grants and rebates for a 12 unit single family development.

$40,000 in grant funds for multiple feasibility studies for wind turbine projects.

$10,000 in rebates for a solar photovoltaic system for a single family home.

Did you know?Did you know? Not since the 1970s have so many programs to support energy efficiency and the local d e v e l o p m e n t o f renewable alternatives been offered by local, state and federal organizations.

Meridian Associates has a winning track record for approval of grant and rebate applications .

$474,000 in grants for a wind turbine generator project.

Sustainability Services 3D Laser Scanning Civil Engineering Land Survey Landscape Architecture

Contact us to learn more about how Meridian can secure grants and rebates for your projects.

Beverly, MA Westborough, MA Cherry Hill, NJ Houston, TX

Here are some examples of incentives Meridian Associates has secured for our clients:

www.meridianassoc.com [email protected] (800) 466- 5505

Would Your Project Benefit from Grants & RebatesWould Your Project Benefit from Grants & Rebates??





Wind Turbine Projects List

Appleton Farms

AvalonBay at Hathorne Hill

AvalonBay Cohasset

Beverly High School GreEnergy

Bristol Community College

DCAM with Massachusetts Technology Collaborative

Endicott College

Essex Agricultural & Technical High School

HJ Heinz Company

Ipswich Public Schools Wind Turbine

Ipswich Wind Turbine Project

Mark Richey Woodworking

NSTAR

Peabody Municipal Light Plant

Private Residence Bergey Wind Turbine

Sagamore Hill

South Essex Sewerage District

The Staples Company

Upper Cape Cod Vocational School

Winter Island G:\ADMIN\Statement of Quals\Marketing Lists\Wind Turbine Projects.doc

Ipswich Wind Turbine Project: The Town of Ipswich has a history of electrical generation that dates back over 100 years. The Ipswich Utilities Department is proposing to develop a small portion of municipally owned property to erect a wind turbine electric generator. Median has been retained to examine a limited number of factors that relate to the economic feasibility of a single turbine project at the designated site. The wind turbine will be able to stabilize electric utility rates and increase the supply of electricity utilizing the natural wind source and at the same time promoting sustainable power through public awareness, permitting, engineering ,and land surveying. The report is intended to provide the Utilities Department an assessment of weather the proposed location is viable for a wind turbine and review three turbine alternatives, and recommend the one with the most favorable projected return on investment.

Wind Power Project Summary

Mark Richey Woodworking Wind Turbine Project: Mark Richey Woodworking and Design crafts and installs high-end architectural mill work for corporate, institutional, retail, restaurant, and residential clients. They use source materials with sustainability in mind and continually work to reduce the energy footprint of their facility. Meridian worked with Mark Richey to install a medium scale wind turbine generator for use at their facility. The displacement of retail energy costs through net metering provides economic incentives to support the philosophy of Mr. Richey. The construction of this medium scale turbine augments the biomass furnace which uses pulp and wood waste from the cabinetry operation to heat the woodworking facility.

South Essex Sewerage District: After several studies in the city, SESD was chosen as the best site to facilitate a wind turbine. Energy savings garnered from the wind turbine could lead to savings for energy consumers in Beverly, Danvers, Marblehead, and Peabody as well as Salem. Meridian has been retained to analyze SODAR wind data and prepare a feasibility report to assess potential wind turbine production as well as an economic analysis.


Bristol Community College: Bristol Community College (BCC), located in Fall River, Massachusetts, offers the local community open access to high quality, affordable, academic programs including associate degree and certificate programs. As a participant in the Commonwealth’s Leading By Example (LBE) program, BCC is looking to install on-site renewable power generation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as well as improve its overall energy efficiency. The LBE programs’ goal is to reduce overall energy consumption on state college campuses by 15% by 2012; with part of this strategy involving the use of renewable energy. Meridian Associates has installed a 50 meter meteorological tower to assess wind data for a period of nine months to complete a wind analysis and economic pro-forma. Meridian Associates will also prepare a $85,000 grant application with the Massachusetts technology Collaborative for the purpose of completing a feasibility study for a commercial scale wind turbine. The proposed 1.5 megawatt turbine will provide the college with clean, renewable energy and reduce electricity costs.

Sagamore Hill, Hamilton, MA: Meridian Associates secured a $40,000 grant from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative for the preparation of a Wind Turbine Feasi-bility Study for a joint project between the USAir Force and the Town of Hamilton. The proposed site for the wind tur-bine is atop Sagamore Hill in Hamilton, which is currently a USAF solar observatory base. The turbine will be used to generate power for the USAF and the Town of Hamilton. The study included 9 months of wind data analysis, projected turbine power output, a complete financial pro-forma, and a fatal flaws analysis.

Private Residence Bergey Wind Turbine: The lattice tower and equipment were installed to supplement domestic energy use. Local wind data was interpolated to establish sufficient facts, which support the investment in this site. Applications were prepared and submitted to permit the construction of the subsurface foundation and tower in close proximity to resource areas which include: salt marsh, costal flooding plain, area of critical environmental concern (ACEC) and costal bank. The proximity of the site necessitated careful construction procedures to avoid impacting environmental resources and wildlife habitats.


The Staples Company: Staples is considering the installation of a commercial scale wind turbine generator (WTG) at their office complex in Framingham, MA to produce electrical energy for on site use. They wish to secure design and construction grant funding from Massachusetts Technology Collaborative under the Large On-Site Renewables Initiative. Prior to applying for this grant, Meridian will conduct a feasibility study based upon the MTC feasibility study requirements. Meridian Associates, Inc. will provide expertise with regard to WTG site engineering, regulatory permit acquisition, access and mobilization, constructability, cost estimating, and electrical load assessment and interconnection.

DCAM with Massachusetts Technology Collaborative: Meridian Associates, Inc, in collaboration with other consultants, are providing professional services related to the study and design of renewable energy projects at various locations throughout Massachusetts. These services are provided under a “house doctor” contract with the state’s Department of Capital Asset Management (DCAM). Services include initial feasibility studies, design development preparation of contract documents, bidding assistance and construction administration for wind and photovoltaic initiatives at state controlled facilities. Currently, feasibility studies are being preformed in accordance with Massachusetts Technology Collaborative in Plymouth and Gardner, MA.

Ipswich Public Schools Wind Turbine: Meridian conducted a preliminary feasibility study to asses the technical and economic viability of the WTG. The study will identify potential locations for the WTG on the property; physical and regulatory constraints associated with the property ,wind resources, permitting requirements, WTG technologies; capital costs, preliminary cost-benefits analyses. The results of the study will equip the school with sound information to further consider the implementation of this cost saving, environmentally friendly renewable energy initiative.


Cuvilly Arts & Earth Center School: Technical assistance was provided to the Cuvilly School in Ipswich, Massachusetts to prepare a site plan and provide the resources necessary to facilitate the construction of a 10 kw wind turbine generator. An assessment of site-specific constraints were undertaken to evaluate the optimum location in achieving the goals and objectives of the educational institution. Our ability to draw on past experience associated with zoning matters and abutter concerns contributed to the overall success of the project. Close communication with the zoning enforcement officer/building inspector was essential.

Peabody Municipal Light Department: Meridian Associates evaluated six potential locations for scale wind power. This study follows an initial assessment of wind resources in Peabody provided by UMass renewable energy research lab. Meridian Associates’ goal is to further evaluate the subject sites for fatal flaws, potential energy generation, and constructability of commercial scale wind turbines. Following the outcome of the study, Meridian will be completing a feasibility study including wind data analysis for a period of nine months.

Beverly High School GreEnergy: Six months of wind data was collected to prepare a feasibility study for the development of a commercial scale Wind Turbine at GreEnergy Park. A Grant Application was prepared on behalf of the City of Beverly to secure funding in the amount of $36,495.00 from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (MTC) to evaluate the design and installation of a Wind Turbine that will, along with the existing Solar Arrays, power the newly reconstructed Beverly High School.


Endicott College: Endicott College is looking to install on-site renewable power generation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as well as improve its overall energy efficiency. Meridian Associates will prepare a $55,000 grant application with the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative for the purpose of completing a feasibility study for the commercial scale wind turbine. The proposed 1.5 megawatt turbine will provide the college with clean, renewable energy and reduce electricity costs.

Upper Cape Cod Vocational School: Meridian Associates was contracted to conduct ground survey to map topographic features, update the existing site plan and prepare base plans for final design purposes and construction specifications. Meridian will also conduct a field survey to map the topographic site features and visible site utilities of the proposed turbine location.

Winter Island, City of Salem, MA: Continuously in use as early as 1643, Winter Island has been the site of a fort, shipyard and Salem’s first tavern. Owned currently by the City of Salem Park Department as a recreational space, it is now being looked at as the potential site of a wind turbine. The city’s Renewable Energy Task Force has determined, with the assistance of Meridian Associates, that a feasibility study is necessary to test the amount of wind at the site. Meridian Associates was retained to conduct a wind data assessment and feasibility study to determine the financial benefits of a commercial scale turbine for the City of Salem. A meteorological tower will be erected to collect wind speed and direction data for a period of 6-12 months.


NSTAR: NSTAR is the largest Massachusetts-based investor owned electric and gas utility, who transmits and delivers electricity and gas to 1.1 million electric customers in 81 communities and in order to meet the renewable energy portfolio standards of Massachusetts, NSTAR retained Meridian Associates to perform a preliminary feasibility analysis to consider the development of a commercial scale wind turbine generator on their property in South Boston. The proposed wind turbine project will provide required renewable energy to their customers under current Massachusetts legislation

AvalonBay at Hathorne Hill: AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is in the business of developing, redeveloping, acquiring and managing high– quality apartment communities. These markets are located throughout the country and the company owns, or holds interests in, hundreds of apartment communities with over 50,000 housing units. AvalonBay retained Meridian Associates to perform a preliminary feasibility analysis to consider the development of a large scale 600kw wind turbine generator in an effort to improve their carbon footprint.

Appleton Farms: Appleton Farms was established in 1639. It has nearly 30 buildings and structures on site from different periods in the farm’s history. It is the second oldest farm in America and was continuously farmed by the Appleton family for nine generations before being conveyed to the Trustees of Reservations in 1998. Appleton Farms is exploring the idea of installing a wind turbine on the property. Meridian Associates was contracted to install and configure a meteorological tower which will manage and collect wind data for a minimum period of six (6) months.





Wind References

Rick Korb, Superintendant Ipswich Public Schools 1 Lord Square Ipswich, MA 01938 (978) 356-2935 Mark Richey, President Mark Richey Woodworking 40 Parker Street Newburyport, MA 01950 (978) 463-7222 Tim Henry, Director Ipswich Utilities Department 272 High Street Ipswich, MA 01938 Leo Racine Director of Facilities Bristol Community College 777 Elsbree Street Fall River, MA 02720 (508) 678-2811 x2448

David Carey, Selectman Town of Hamilton 577 Bay Road P.O. Box 429 Hamilton, MA 01936 (978) 468-9932 Major. James Bono Commander, Sagamore Hill Solar Observatory Det2, 2WS 305 Sagamore Street South Hamilton, MA 01982-1218 (781) 377-4600 William F. Waters/Barbara Previte Peabody Municipal Light Plant 201 Warren St. Extension Peabody, MA 01960 (978) 531-5975

G:\ADMIN\Wind Stuff\Wind References.doc

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTSSTATE HOUSE • BOSTON, MA 02133

(617)725-4000

DEVAL L. PATRICKGOVERNOR

TIMOTHY P. MURRAYLIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

September 2009

Mr. Rob HoweSustainnovation Consulting; PresidentMeridian Associates152 Conant StreetBeverly, MA 01915

Dear Mr. Howe:II

Thank you for choosing to make your company an inaugural member ofthe Governor's Clean Energy Challenge. The New England Clean EnergyCouncil has created this Challenge to inspire Massachusetts businesses todramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and I applaud you for takingpart.

As you work toward your commitment to reduce your company'sgreenhouse gas emissions by 10 percent over the next three years, I am sureyou will see the benefits in reduced energy costs and the satisfaction of making asignificant contribution to the fight against global climate change. Additionally,you will help build our future economic prosperity. The investments you make inenergy efficient equipment and onsite renewable energy generation will spurinnovation and growth in a clean energy industry that is already growing in ourCommonwealth, where we are leading the nation toward a clean energyeconomy.

In accepting the Challenge, you have joined arms with more than 100companies around the state. Please use the resources available to you throughthe Challenge's partners to reap the benefits in energy cost savings and 'environmental leadership. I look forward to following your progress andrecognizing your accomplishments along the way.

Sincerely,-------

* Prm>rnm ON R~:C'f('U:O P,\PF.R


Donald E. Bowen, Jr., PLS

Principal


Civil Engineering

[email protected] (800) 466-5505

3D Laser Scanning Landscape Land Survey Sustainability

Ipswich Municipal Light Department, Ipswich, MA Part of Meridian’s project team that performed technical and economic feasibility studies, design development, permitting, and preparation of contract documents for a 1.65 MW wind turbine generator. Services also included assistance in preparing grant funding applications and technical consultation and advice throughout the Town’s early purchase of the wind turbine which yielded a favorable vote to appropriate $4.2Million for the project at the annual town meeting. Currently providing bidding assistance for the public procurement of site preparation and wind turbine erection. Construction phase services will be provided in the first quarter of 2010. The wind turbine generator is a joint project between the IMLD and the Ipswich School Department (ISD), which will generate power for the High School, Middle School, and other town offices. A successful application for $1.6Million in Clean Renewable Energy Bonds was awarded for the ISD, which is a zero interest bond program issued by the federal government. Solar Electric (Photovoltaic) Feasibility Study, EBSCO Publishing, Ipswich, MA Utilized a combination of technologies and collaborative relationships to analyze existing electric energy consumption on the EBSCO Publishing campus to develop a feasibility study for the integration of photovoltaic solar panels. This renewable energy initial is part of an overall plan to address growing energy costs at this facility – the home office for 450 employees worldwide. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Office of the Attorney General, Essex Superior Court, Boston, MA Provided expert witness testimony in the eminent domain litigation of Ruth Ricker and Howard Ricker v. Commonwealth. Testimony was supported by plans and trial exhibits. Consultation with the attorney’s representing the Commonwealth throughout the changing course of the trial assisted in the successful outcome of this case.

Years of Professional Experience 27

Education

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1982 Merrimack College, North Andover, Massachusetts

Registration and Certifications

Professional Land Surveyor Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Licensed Land Surveyor State of New Hampshire

Professional Land Surveyor

State of Maine

Notary Public Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Certified Title 5 Soil Evaluator

University of Massachusetts and the Stockbridge School of Agriculture

Professional Affiliations

Massachusetts Association of Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers

American Congress on Surveying and Mapping

New Hampshire Land Surveyors Association

Maine Society of Land Surveyors

National Society of Professional Surveyors

Donald E. Bowen, Jr. has conducted numerous boundary retracement surveys, title insurance surveys, Land Court surveys, site detail/topographic surveys, as well as, performed complete construction layout for residential, commercial and industrial projects and aerial control services. Mr. Bowen has also represented clients at local, state and federal levels in many aspects of the regulatory permitting processes. He continually upgrades field and office standards associated with land boundary issues utilizing state of the art technologies. Mr. Bowen has brought his diversified technical and managerial skills to MAI. His experience encompasses innovative management techniques, report preparation, site evaluation and land planning.


Jonathan Markey, P.E. Senior Project Manager


Civil Engineering


3D Laser Scanning Landscape Architecture Land Survey Sustainability

Ipswich Municipal Light Department, Ipswich, MA Part of Meridian’s project team that performed technical and economic feasibility studies, design development, permitting, and preparation of contract documents for a 1.65 MW wind turbine generator. Services also included assistance in preparing grant funding applications and technical consultation and advice throughout the Town’s early purchase of the wind turbine which yielded a favorable vote to appropriate $4.2Million for the project at the annual town meeting. Currently providing bidding assistance for the public procurement of site preparation and wind turbine erection. Construction phase services will be provided in the first quarter of 2010. The wind turbine generator is a joint project between the IMLD and the Ipswich School Department (ISD), which will generate power for the High School, Middle School, and other town offices. A successful application for $1.6Million in Clean Renewable Energy Bonds was awarded for the ISD, which is a zero interest bond program issued by the federal government.

Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., Fall River & Brockton, MA Complete design and permitting of 50,000s.f medical office building located adjacent to the Anna Jacques Hospital Campus. Design included stormwater management facilities, parking areas, exterior lighting design, sewer and domestic water conveyance systems, and access and roadway design. The project has obtained all necessary permits including Variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals, Special Permit and Residential Subdivision and Major Site Plan Review by Planning Board. The medical center was operational in the Spring of 2009.

Beverly High School, Beverly, MA Beverly high school currently houses a 100kw solar array for the generation of power for the school campus. The city of Beverly has been interested in wind since their installation of a 10kW wind turbine over 10 years ago. A grant application was prepared on behalf of the city from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, which yielded $40,000 for the preparation for a feasibility study, which is currently in its final phase of preparation. With its proximity to Beverly Municipal Airport, close communication and review were required with the FAA to finally conclude a notice of No Presumed Hazard to aircraft navigation.


Education

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 2000 University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts

Registration

Registered Professional Engineer, Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Registered Professional Engineer,

State of New Hampshire

Certified Soil Evaluator, Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Certified Title V System Inspector,

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Mark Richey Wind Turbine, Newburyport, MA Mark Richey Woodworking is a high end finish woodworking facility located in the Industrial Park in Newburyport Massachusetts. As a major consumer of electricity, and steward of the environment, Mark Richey is installing a 600kW Wind Turbine Generator to provide 75% of his annual power. Wind and economic feasibility studies were performed to determine the financial benefits of the proposed turbine, as well as a successful grant from MTC for approximately $475,000 for design and construction. Bat and Avian, Acoustic, Shadow Flicker, and Photomontage simulations were prepared and presented during the permitting process, as well as a balloon test. The turbine was commissioned in February 2009.

Mr. Markey is presently responsible for managing feasibility and design consultation services for renewable energy projects, offering broad knowledge in finance, alternative energy technologies, and environmental impact mitigation. In addition, he brings experience from civil site design for residential and commercial properties including roadway layout, drainage design, and environmental permitting. He has worked on numerous wind turbine projects in all phases - from conception and planning, to feasibility and permitting, to final construction.


Brian Montejunas, P.E. Senior Project Manager


Civil Engineering



Public Works Improvements Program, 2006-Present, Malden, Massachusetts

Project Manager and design engineer providing comprehensive ser-vices related to the planning, design, bidding assistance and construc-tion administration for improvements to the municipal water distribution system and associated streets and sidewalks. To date, approxi-mately 4.8 miles of circa-1900 unlined cast iron waster mains and more that 720 lead service connections have been replaced throughout the city. Extensive roadway and sidewalk improvements were made in association with the waterworks improvements and in other loca-tion. The improvements included replacement of existing sidewalk and driveway with new cement concrete setting and restricting granite curb accessibility improvements and full-width pavement reconstruction by reclamation or overlay of existing pavement.

Municipal Utility Infrastructure Assessment, Malden, Massachusetts Conducted a general assessment of the ability of the municipal water, sewer and storm drain systems to support continued development and redevelopment within the City. Evaluated the City’s municipal water, sewer, and storm drain from existing plans and from meetings with the City’s Engineering Department to determine that the existing systems are suitable for continued growth .

Bennett’s Pond Brook Drainage Study, Melrose, Massachusetts Design Engineer for miscellaneous drainage works and related im-provements in the Bennett’s Pond Brook watershed located in the City’s Horace Mann neighborhood. Projects have included a comprehensive drainage study of the 600-acre watershed; development of phased im-provement program; design, preparation of contract documents and construction administration for Phase I improvements including 500 LF of 3-30” pipes, a 3.5’x 6’ box culvert and the associated reconstruction of Hesseltine Avenue and Hesseltine Field, a multi-use athletic field; and design development for a second phase of improvements consist-ing of 750 LF of new 36” drain and associated relocation of sewer and water lines and roadway and sidewalk reconstruction in Ruggles Street, Damon Avenue, Cochrane and Howard Streets.


Education

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 2001 University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts

Registration

Registered Professional Engineer, Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Certified Soil Evaluator,

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Brian J. Montejunas has variable experience ranging from field survey-ing, engineering and construction inspection. He has survey experi-ence in topographic surveys, construction layout, and boundary recon-naissance. His engineering design experience includes conventional and cluster residential subdivisions, hydrologic studies, and highway layout and alignment. Mr. Montejunas has extensive construction in-spection, roadway, and drainage design experience.


Diane E. Gagnon Project Engineer


Civil Engineering



Avalon Bay Communities, Massachusetts As part of a preliminary feasibility analyses to consider generators for two of Avalon Bay’s complexes in Massachusetts, wind resource analysis was performed from wind data collected by Massachusetts Renewable Energy Laboratory the development of large scale wind turbine at a nearby site location and correlated to long term data obtained from National Climatic Data Collection. Energy production calculations and financial pro-forma for two commercial wind turbines of different faceplate ratings was completed. Endicott College, Beverly, MA A $32,000 grant was applied for and awarded to Endicott College by the Commonwealth Wind Community-Scale Wind Initiative to investigate the feasibility of installing a 1.5 megawatt (MW) turbine on their campus property. A 50m metrological tower was installed at proposed site location in January of 2010 and will collect data for a period of twelve (12) month. Currently, permitting and environmental issues, site physical characteristics and access, shadow analysis and community acceptance have been investigated. At time of data collection completion wind analysis, turbine energy production and financial analysis will be executed. Bristol Community College, Fall River, MA A $65,000 grant was applied for and awarded to Bristol Community College by the Commonwealth Wind Community-Scale Wind Initiative to investigate the feasibility of installing a 1.5 megawatt (MW) turbine generator to help offset the energy costs for the college. A 50m metrological tower was installed at proposed site location the spring of 2009 and will collect data for a period of twelve (12) month. Currently, permitting and environmental issues, site physical characteristics and access, shadow analysis and community acceptance have been investigated. At time of data collection completion wind analysis, turbine energy production and financial analysis will be executed.


Education

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering 2003

University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts

South Essex Sewerage District, Salem, MA The South Essex Sewerage District is a waste water facility that services households in the towns of Beverly, Danvers, Marblehead, Peabody and Salem. Wind data collected by means of SODAR was analyzed for the City of Salem to determine the sites wind resources and its potential for the installation of a commercial size wind turbine. A complete feasibility study was conducted examining all local state and federal permitting required, addressing potential environmental concerns, shadow and visual analysis, and the power production and financial pro-form of five (5) turbines with faceplate ratings from 100 KW to 1.5 MW.

Sagamore Hill, Hamilton, MA Meridian Associates secured a $40,000 grant from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative for the preparation of a Wind Turbine Feasibility Study for a joint project between the US Air Force and the Town of Hamilton. The proposed site for the wind turbine is atop Sagamore Hill in Hamilton, the location of a USAF solar observatory base. Nine months of data was collected at this site and used to complete Feasibility Study including wind analysis, projected turbine power production, complete financial pro-forma, and a fatal flaws study.

Ms. Gagnon has variable experience developing wind turbine renewable energy projects from pre-feasibility analysis to the design and construction phase. These responsibilities include feasibility studies, conducting wind resource, shadow, and visual analyses, securing state funding, financial analysis, obtaining necessary local, state, and federal permitting, and civil site design. Additionally, she has experience in the residential, commercial and municipal sectors performing roadway layouts, site grading, drainage calculations, septic and sewer system design and project permitting.


Raul Arauz, EIT Project Engineer


Civil Engineering


3D Laser Scanning Landscape Land Survey Sustainability

Sagamore Hill Wind Feasibility Study, Hamilton, MA A Feasibility Study was conducted for the Town of Hamilton and the US Air Force at the US Air Force Sagamore Hill Solar Observatory site. Wind and economic feasibility studies were performed to determine the financial benefits of the proposed turbine. Bat and Avian, Acoustic, Shadow Flicker, and Photomontage simulations were prepared and presented during the permitting process. Endicott College, Beverly, MA A $32,000 grant was applied for and awarded to Endicott College by the Commonwealth Wind Community-Scale Wind Initiative to investigate the feasibility of installing a 1.5 megawatt (MW) turbine on their campus property. A 50m metrological tower was installed at proposed site location in January of 2010 and will collect data for a period of twelve (12) month. Currently, permitting and environmental issues, site physical characteristics and access, shadow analysis and community acceptance have been investigated. At time of data collection completion wind analysis, turbine energy production and financial analysis will be executed. Bristol Community College, Fall River, MA A $65,000 grant was applied for and awarded to Bristol Community College by the Commonwealth Wind Community-Scale Wind Initiative to investigate the feasibility of installing a 1.5 megawatt (MW) turbine generator to help offset the energy costs for the college. A 50m metrological tower was installed at proposed site location the spring of 2009 and will collect data for a period of twelve (12) month. Currently, permitting and environmental issues, site physical characteristics and access, shadow analysis and community acceptance have been investigated. At time of data collection completion wind analysis, turbine energy production and financial analysis will be executed.


Education

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering 2001

Santa Maria Catholic University, Panama

Registration and Certifications Engineer in Training (EIT)

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Candidate for US Green Building Council LEED Green Associate Certification

Professional Affiliations

American Society of Civil Engineers Boston Section

Young Professionals in Energy Association

YMCA of the North Shore, Beverly, MA Facilities The YMCA of the North Shore engaged Meridian Associates to produce a Sustainability Assessment and Recommendations report for its three facilities in Beverly, MA. Meridian proceeded to conduct analyses of the facilities’ electricity usage, existing lighting, waste disposal practices, water usage, heating and cooling equipment, and site landscaping practices. Renewable energy opportunities were also analyzed in regards to wind and solar feasibility for the three sites.

Mr. Arauz is presently responsible for performing feasibility studies, design services, fatal flaws analysis and grant application preparation for renewable energy projects, with emphasis in Wind Data Analysis software. Additionally, he brings a diverse experience ranging from civil site design for residential and commercial properties including roadway layout, drainage design, railway design, landfill design and construction, Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and environmental permitting. Mr. Arauz hails from Panama where he worked for the Panama Canal. His bilingual skills helped Meridian secure a project in Panamanian territory.


Evans Associates Proposal

216 Green Bay Rd., Suite 205, Thiensville, WI 53092 Phone: (262) 242-6000 Fax: (262) 242-6045

http://www.evansassoc.com

Evans Associates - Wind Turbine Services

Due Diligence Analyses RF Impact Analysis

Impact Mitigation Planning

Prepared for: Jeff Brandt

TRC Environmental

Evans Associates Renewable Energy Consultants 216 Green Bay Rd., Suite 205 Thiensville, Wisconsin 53092

www.evansassoc.com

[email protected]

262-242-6000

http://www.evansassoc.com 2

Radio Frequency, Microwave Path and Broadcast Studies – Task Description

This is a proposal for Evans Associates to conduct and document definitive impact analyses in order to determine the extent to which the construction of one or two wind turbines on Copicut Hill, near Fall River, MA, could cause a significant disruption to the service areas of FCC licensed radio frequency facilities. The study will be conducted using industry and FCC standard procedures, and a final report is submitted outlining expected effects, alternatives, mitigation procedures and recommendations. Evans’ fee schedule for primary consultants is $170/hour, with maximum fees guaranteed.

Evans Associates will conduct studies including any or all of the following:

1. MICROWAVE PATH STUDY Professional fees: $1,950

This study may be conducted in one of two ways:

• The designation of “blackout areas” where the wind turbines cannot be sited.

• The second method involves the determination of the impact due to pre-sited turbines, for which the geographic coordinates and ground elevations are known.

The impact of each turbine or potential turbine site is assessed and Evans determines mitigation measures as per the following tasks:

1. Identify microwave paths within the project area from the FCC database and

determine Fresnel blockage areas to protect path integrity and minimize legal risk for the site developer.

2. Analyze the effect of aperture blockage within the blackout area or with respect to

the proposed turbine positioning for each path in all three spatial dimensions (N/S, E/W, Altitude). Recommend changes in either turbine locations or the microwave facility as appropriate and necessary.

3. Prepare an impact and mitigation report, and provide GIS shape files and maps

describing the 3-D blackout areas.


2. PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO and LAND MOBILE FACILITIES: $1,750

For this task, Evans will identify from the FCC database facilities in the impact area associated with public safety (police, fire, emergency management), land mobile (business 2-way service) and other fixed services. Possible multipath and aperture blockage will be investigated, and mitigation measures developed. As part of this task, all FCC and FAA registered communications sites in the area will be identified along with their owners and licensees.

The impact of each turbine or potential turbine site is assessed and Evans determines mitigation measures as per the following tasks:

1. Identify land mobile and public safety transmitters within the project area and

determine Fresnel blockage areas to protect transmission integrity and minimize legal risk for the site developer.

2. Analyze the effect of aperture blockage within the blackout area or with respect to

the proposed turbine positioning. Recommend changes in either turbine locations or the land mobile/public safety facility as appropriate and necessary.

3. Prepare an impact and mitigation report, and provide GIS shape files and maps

showing the land mobile/public safety sites.

3. NTIA NOTIFICATION: $650 For this task, Evans will make formal notification of the wind project and its parameters to the federal DOC’s National Technical Information Agency, for the purpose of coordinating the wind project with certain government agencies that could be operating potentially-affected transmitters in areas near the wind project. Evans will notify TRC when NTIA’s assessment is completed, usually between 45 and 60 days. 4. SITE VISIT & SITING RECOMMENDATIONS: Approx. Range $6,480 - $8,860 In order to supplement the information obtained in our in-office analysis, a visit to the project site is recommended to determine the communications facilities that are actually on Copicut Hill, and to make turbine siting recommendations based on information gathered at the site. FCC databases often contain errors and omissions regarding licensed facilities, and many microwave links are unlicensed and thus are not revealed in the in-office studies. Also, pertinent characteristics of certain transmitting facilities are not ascertainable through the FCC databases. Evans will send a technician to the turbine and communications tower sites to gather pertinent information about the tower tenants and compare them to FCC records, to help us


determine protection parameters with respect to the wind turbines. We will review the proposed turbine locations and recommend detailed strategies to mitigate potential conflicts. We will also provide guidance for implementing these strategies and, if appropriate, recommend modifications or alternative locations for affected communications facilities. If TRC elects to have this additional task done, the cost of Task 1 will be reduced by $360 and the cost of Task 2 will be reduced by $320.


Deliverables

Evans Associates will provide the client with a complete report and exhibits showing the details of the analysis, results and conclusions.

Schedule Evans Associates is normally able to complete all office studies within 20 business days of receipt of the turbine layout information, baring unforeseen impediments such as an unresolved or inconsistent entry in the FCC’s database that requires further investigation. On-site work will require about five weeks to complete. Evans Associates will not proceed on any of the above tasks until so instructed by TRC.


Evans Associates Personnel - Wind Turbine Services

Project Managers (Principal Consultants)

Ralph E. Evans is the founder and managing partner of Evans Associates. His educational background includes both Communications Engineering and Computer Science from the University of Wisconsin in Madison. He has written dozens of computer programs and software tools, and has evolved programming techniques adopted by the FCC and the Association of Federal Communications Consulting Engineers. Mr. Evans is an expert in providing integrated strategic planning services for all segments of the telecommunications industry. He has designed methods and equipment for eliminating the “re-radiation effect” that causes wind turbines and their

supporting structures to disrupt AM broadcast transmissions. Ralph is Evans’ primary report writer, and lecturer at wind, broadcasting and telecommunications seminars. Frequently-requested topics include “Wind turbine impact to public safety communications facilities and its mitigation” and “Managing turbine siting risk using the Monte Carlo analysis”. Ralph also produces video programs featuring site-specific wind turbine farms for use at public consensus meetings.

B. Benjamin Evans P.E. has been a partner in Evans Associates since 1979, after graduating in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin with a minor in Computer Science. His expertise extends to the allocation and design of commercial and educational broadcast facilities (AM, FM and TV), microwave networks and wireless systems. Ben is Evans' Wind Turbine RF Impact Division manager, and maintains the Evans engineering research library. He is a licensed Professional Engineer, and a member of the Association of Federal Communications Consulting Engineers (AFCEE). Ben is adept at obtaining community consensus for wind turbine facility

building permits, and is especially skilled at mediating disputes between licensees, site developers and community representatives. Field Crew Manager – Nels Harvey

Evans has a well-experienced field crew having extensive prior experience in turbine and communications technologies. Our field crew is headed by Mr. Nels Harvey. Mr. Harvey has conducted field surveys for dozens of wind turbine projects. He is expert at surveying the search area, proposing alternatives, and documenting before and after environmental conditions. Resume information is available upon request.


Evans Associates Partial Client List For Wind Turbine Services

AMEC Earth and Environmental American Wind Power Center Avant Energy AWS Truewind Clipper Windpower Ecology and Environment EMS Energy Enxco TRC/UPC Wind Florida Power and Light Northwest Wind Partners Hennepin County/HDR Inc. Iberdrola Renewables Invenergy Jones and Stokes Milwaukee Gas and Electric Wisconsin Public Service MidAmerican Energy Company Missouri River Energy Navitas New Frontier Renewable Energy Northwest Wind Partners Plumas Sierra PPM Energy Project Resources Revolution Energy URS Corporation TRC Environmental Tennessee Valley Authority Wind Capital Group Evans’ “Firsts” and Significant Projects:

1. American Wind Power Center: Evans designed a “detuning” apparatus that rendered the wind turbine, that was located within 1 mile of an AM radio station, effectively “invisible” to radio frequencies.

2. Wisconsin Public Service: Evans Associates conducted TV and FM broadcast field and

tabletop studies to determine if the addition of a wind farm would degrade the signal reception for nearby residents. Mitigation measures were recommended.

3. Tennessee Valley Authority: Evans’ unique software tools were used to evaluate the

magnitude of turbine impact caused to communications facilities located on Buffalo Mountain, Tennessee. Facilities included digital broadcast, the Federal Department of Energy, the Department of Defense, numerous microwave links and Public safety Radio.

4. TRC Environmental: Evans provided numerous exhibits for the Cape Wind Project

Environmental Statement, including impact to government and navigational radar.

5. Black Forest Colorado: Evans designed a zoning board presentation program consisting of expert witnesses, video presentations, and citizen consensus opportunities. A specialized video program was produced to present the advantages of the wind farm and to answer citizen concerns.

Contact information is available upon request. E:\EA\Client Services\Windmills\TRC_Environmental\Copicut Hill Wind Turbine Studies Proposal.doc


Permitting Requirements for Copicut Hill Project

Permitting Requirements for Copicut Hill Project The following is a description of environmental permits that may likely be required for the Copicut Hill project. The actual permit requirements will need to be confirmed once project location (i.e. turbine location, and access road and interconnection routes) is determined. As well, project size will make a difference in the permitting requirements: Permitting will be more extensive for a full build out scenario (e.g. 6 turbines). In general the amount of permitting required will hinge on the extent of wetland impacts, which will need to be determined via a wetland delineation and a review of site layout. Local Permitting Requirements Local Permitting requirements include filing of a Notice of Intent with the Fall River Conservation Commission for impacts to wetlands or wetland buffer zone, Site Plan Review under the Fall River Zoning process, and a building permit. The requirements for these are discussed below. Conservation Commission Approval The project may require the filing of a Notice of Intent with the Fall River Conservation Commission to address impacts to wetlands associated with the construction of access roads, the wind turbines themselves, and interconnection lines. As well, any impacts to wetlands associated with temporary lay down areas, staging areas, or the construction of a substation, would require approval under the Fall River Conservation Commission. The Massachusetts GIS data shows that there are no wetlands in the municipally owned portion of the land above 90 meters (see Figure No. 3 in Attachment No. 6 to this grant application) except for one small area, but such data is not always accurate. The City of Fall River will need to delineate wetlands and if there are wetlands in the area of the work or the work is located within 100 feet of wetlands, than a Notice of Intent will need to be filed. This requires the development of project plans to show the extent of wetland impact, and a description of the type and amount of wetland resources affected. The procedure involves a hearing before the commission and requires that the proponent demonstrate that wetland impacts have been avoided, minimized and or mitigated in accordance with the Wetland Protection Act standards. A Notice of Intent may also be required for the installation of the Meteorological tower depending on its location relative to wetland resources, though we anticipate this will not be required and will confirm via a wetlands delineation. Site Plan Review under the Fall River Zoning As the city is the applicant, zoning review may not be required. Some cities and towns pursue zoning review regardless of the requirement to demonstrate that the municipality is complying with its own regulations and or to gain official approval of the town. In this case, the City would need to demonstrate compliance with its new Wind by-law which includes compliance with the State’s noise standards at (310 CMR 7.10), and demonstration of compliance with the fall zone setback requirement from roads and property lines that is equal to the height of the turbine blade

at its highest point. These do not appear to be an issue given the size of the site and its setback from other homes and sensitive receptors. Building Permit The Project will require a building permit from the City of Fall River. The meteorological tower and the turbine will need to comply with all relevant building codes and relevant safety issues. State Permitting Requirements Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Review The state MEPA review acts as an information clearing house whereby project proponents provide information about the environmental impacts of their projects so that permitting agencies and stakeholders can identify the extent of affect of such projects and request additional review or mitigation to minimize impacts. The first stage of the MEPA review involves filing an Environmental Notification Form (ENF) if the project triggers a MEPA review threshold. This allows the public to understand basic information about the project, and then if needed, the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs can request further studies and/or the filing of a more detailed environmental report (i.e., the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in either a Draft and Final version or a Single version). Work could possibly trigger an ENF via 301 CMR 11.03(3)(b)1d for alteration of 5,000 or more sf of bordering or isolated vegetated wetlands. The requirement for an EIR is unlikely for the one or two turbine scenario, though there may be some possibility for the full build out scenario (10 turbines) if disturbance results in alteration of 50 or more acres of land or alteration of more than 10 acres of wetlands. Both of these will depend on siting and layout of access roads and interconnection lines. DEP - Water Quality Certification (314 CMR 9.00: 401) To the extent the project involves the discharge of dredged or fill material into more than 5000 square feet of wetlands or a waterway for either the turbine towers, access roads, construction of a substation, temporary work or laydown areas, or other use, then a Water Quality Certification would be required. The Water Quality Certification is required to ensure that the fill placed does not negatively affect the water quality and environmental and human resources that use the water for drinking and or as wildlife habitat. An Order of Conditions is typically a pre-requisite to filing for a Water Quality Certification. Federal Permitting Requirements The project may require federal permits such as: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) permit if there are wetland impacts, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) review, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for construction stormwater, and possibly for construction dewatering, as well as consultation with federal agencies including: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and U.S.

National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NITA). These regulatory requirements are discussed below. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) The ACOE may be involved in the project to the extent there are wetland impacts. The ACOE potentially has jurisdiction through section 404 of the Clean Water Act, if the proposed project will have temporary or permanent impacts to wetlands or waters of the United States. A wetland delineation of the project facilities will be needed to determine if the ACOE will have jurisdiction. The ACOE will evaluate the project to ensure the proposed work minimizes impacts to wetlands and is the least damaging practicable alternative. The review process at the Corps will hinge on the size of impacted area. Projects of less than one acre can qualify for a Programmatic General Permit (PGP), which does not involve public notice, and projects that are larger than this require review through the ACOE individual permit process, which involves a more lengthy and detailed evaluation process, a public notice, and evaluation of agency and public comments. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency The EPA would have jurisdiction of certain project activities as pertaining to the Clean Water Act. Specifically, the project will require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharge General Permits for both the construction and operation of the facility. These permit applications will outline the measures taken by the project to manage the stormwater during both the construction and operation of the project and require the development of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shows the drainage system and discusses the measures taken to prevent excessive sedimentation or contamination in stormwater runoff into wetlands and waterways. Federal Aviation Administration The Project turbines would be greater than 200 feet high and as such, would trigger FAA review thresholds under part 77 – Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. Specifically, Section 77.13 a (2) (ii), requires notice for any construction greater than 200 feet high. Based on the evaluation of FAA’s data base and other towers permitted in the area, FAA issues do not appear to be a critical flaw. In addition, there are no airports within 5 miles of the project U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Agency – Consultation The NTIA is responsible for managing the federal agency use of telecommunications and radar facilities including Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security communications. Although not a specific requirement of any permitting process, it is typically recommend that wind project proponents coordinate with NTIA to confirm that there is not an impact to federally operated radio frequency facilities.


Wind Assessment/Permitting Schedule

Environmental Surveys and Data Collection 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24Meteorological Tower Data CollectionWetland Survey

Avian Survey [initial data gathering and limited on‐site observations during migration and or breeding periods]

T & ECommunications Study and interconnection studyLocal Approvals ‐ Construction of Turbines

Conservation Commission (may not be required ‐ only required if wetlands impacts or within 100 feet of wetlands)

Zoning Review [may be optional for City]Building PermintState Approvals ‐ Construction of TurbinesMEPA ENF (may not be required)

DEP Water Quality Certification (may not be required ‐ only needed of > 5000 sf of wetlands impacts

Federal Approvals ‐ Construction of TurbinesACOE (only required if wetland impacts)FAA (may not be required for met tower), and then required for siting of Turbines and use of CranesSPDES Stormwater General PermitFWS CommentsGrant Funding

Grant Funding and Approval ‐ Design and Construction

Feasibility ReportPrepare and Complete Feasibility Report

KEY

Data Collection/Applicatioin PreperationAgency ReviewApplication Filed/Permit Issued

Optional Attachment No. 9

Wind Resource Assessment

First Level Screening Wind Resource Assessment The first task in the Fall River wind feasibility assessment was to generally assess winds in the area to determine whether there is sufficient wind resources to operate a financially viable wind development project. This analysis was performed first in order to confirm adequacy of the wind resource and to provide guidance regarding the siting of the turbine. The first level screening approach involves assembling available wind resource maps of the Fall River area as well as identifying relevant meteorological data in the form of hourly observations at specific locations that can provide additional information to be used with the wind resource maps. In addition to the available wind maps and surface meteorological data wind resource analysis conducted for the Fall River Waste Water Treatment Plant Wind Turbine project and the Lightolier project were reviewed and results incorporated into this first level screening. TRC also is aware of meteorological data being collected for the Bristol Community College wind project in Fall River, though this information will not be available until the summer of 2010. Table 1 shows the standard wind power classification system. This system shows 7 wind power classes with 1 being the poorest wind conditions and Class 7 being the best conditions. Typically, annual wind speeds of at least 5 m/s are required for grid connected wind projects while for large scale wind projects Class 4 rating or higher is desirable. Evaluation of Wind Resource Maps Wind resource maps over the Fall River area were developed by AWS Truewind. The wind maps were developed using a proprietary mesoscale numerical weather prediction model using a grid resolution of 1 km. The numerical model output is then passed through a diagnostic meteorological model and downscaled to a resolution of 200 meters using finer resolution terrain and land use data. These simulations are conducted for each day of a randomly sampled 15-year period. The result is an annual wind resource map at a grid resolution of 200 meters. These wind maps were obtained through the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative.

[1]

Figure 1 shows the annual average wind speed map at a height of 50 meters above ground at Fall River and the surrounding region. This map shows that the highest wind speeds are confined to the immediate coastal sections while somewhat lower annual wind speeds occur over broader regions inland. Across the Fall River area the annual average wind speed at 50 meters above ground is between 5.5-6.0 m/s but with areas of lower wind speeds (i.e. < 5.5 m/s) occurring at various locations. The higher wind speeds are likely the result of elevated terrain. Figure 2 shows an annual wind power density map at 50 meters above ground. This map shows that wind power density across the Fall River area is on the order of 200-300 Watts/m2 and with pockets of lower wind power density evident. These data suggest that the Fall River area is characterized by Class 2 wind resource which is on the low end of the wind power classification system shown in Table 1. Analysis of Hourly Observations Hourly observational data was obtained from available surface meteorological stations from the National Climatic Data Center TD3505 data set (Integrated Surface Hourly Weather Observations). Three-years of hourly data for the period 2006-2008 were used from both New Bedford Airport and the Borden Flats Light station in Mount Hope Bay. Figure 3 shows a plot of the available surface station locations. The analysis of this data consisted of first performing a data quality assessment by plotting a time series of the wind speed, wind direction, and temperature data for the three year period. Any observations that were clear outliers were flagged and examined closer to assess whether the data could be in error. If the data was suspected to contain errors it was removed from the analysis. Three years of hourly observations from the New Bedford Airport ASOS (Automated Surface Observing Station) site (station number 725065) for the period 2006-2008 was included in the analysis. The New Bedford station is located about 17 km east of Fall River in an area that has similar land surface characteristics to Fall River. The wind measurement height is 7.9 meters. In addition, data for the same three-year period from the Borden Flats Light station was also examined. Meteorological instruments at this site are mounted on top of a small lighthouse situated over Mount Hope Bay. Wind measurement height is estimated from photographs to be approximately 18 meters. Since the Borden Flats Light station is located offshore in Mount Hope Bay and this station is

[2]

likely not representative of wind conditions over inland areas of Fall River. Additionally, temperature measurements were missing for most of the three-year period so the data could not be used to compute wind power density. A data quality assessment of the New Bedford data showed that the observations were of reasonable quality. Figure 3 shows a time series of wind speeds from New Bedford and from Borden Flats Light. No clear extreme wind speeds are indicated and there are no extended periods of calm winds which typically suggest instrument problems from either station. Valid data recovery at New Bedford is good with a data recovery of 92.9 percent of the three-year period. This suggests the data is of good quality. The Borden Flats Light station had a valid data recovery of 85.1 percent. Note that the time series plot for Borden Flats Light shows two significant gaps in data during the three year data period. Figure 5 shows the three-year composite wind rose for both New Bedford and Borden Flats Light. This figure shows the frequency of various wind speeds and wind directions at these two stations. The lower bound wind speed was determined based on an assumed cut-in speed of 3 m/s scaled down to the instrument measurement height for each station from an assumed hub height of 50 meters. This scaling was performed using the wind power law equation and an assumed wind shear exponent value of 0.17. The value of the wind shear exponent was taken from the Fall River Waste Water Treatment Facility Wind Resource Assessment study and was based on meteorological monitoring data collected during that study. The wind roses in Figure 5 show that both sites have a southwesterly prevailing wind direction. The New Bedford data shows a peak frequency of southwest winds and a secondary peak in frequency of west and west-northwest winds. At New Bedford calm winds which are winds less than the assumed scaled down cut-in speed of 2.2 m/s, were found to occur 33.5 percent of the time. At Borden Flats Light the calm wind threshold is shown to be 2.6 m/s and winds less than this speed occur about 23.2 percent of the time. Figure 6 shows a three-year average diurnal plot of wind speed at both New Bedford and Borden Flats Light. These plots show the typical increase in wind speed during daytime heating hours. The Borden Flats Light data shows a flatter diurnal cycle with slightly higher overall wind speeds, consistent with it’s location over water. In order to better understand the wind resource based on the observed data, wind speed at New Bedford was scaled upward to reflect estimates at high heights above ground. The heights were selected to be consistent with typical turbine hub heights and also consistent

[3]

with heights used in available wind maps. The power law equation was used to scale the winds and this equation is:

V2= V1 (Z2/Z1) α

Where V2 is the desired wind speed at height Z2 and V1 is the reference wind speed at height Z1.

The variable α is the wind shear exponent and it site-dependant. Note that the value of α at the

New Bedford and Borden Flats Light station is not known. The value of 0.17 is assumed since this represents the best estimate available for the region. This value was taken from the Fall River Waste Water Treatment Facility wind Project Feasibility Study. Since this value was estimated from data collected at a coastal site, it applicability to more inland locations and locations on elevated terrain is questionable. However, this is the best estimate available and appears to be a reasonable value representing well mixed conditions in the lower boundary layer. Table 2 shows the annual average wind speed at heights of 30, 50, 70, and 100 meters for both New Bedford and Borden Flats Light. The three year average speed is also shown. This table shows that Borden flats Light has slightly higher average wind speeds than New Bedford. This is expected since Borden Flats Light is situated over the open water of Mount Hope Bay. At 50 meters the average wind speed at New Bedford is on the order of 4.9 m/s for 2006 and 2007 and 4.5 m/s for 2008. The year 2008 showed slightly lower average wind speed than the other two years at both meteorological stations. Table 3 shows the estimated wind power density expressed in watts/m2 for 20, 50, 70, and 100 meters above ground for New Bedford only. The wind power density for Borden Lights Flat was not computed since this station had only a very small number of hours containing temperature data and pressure data was not available. The estimated wind power density shows that at 50 meters the wind power density was estimated to be 277 watts/m2. This is generally consistent with the wind power density estimates from the AWS Truewind wind maps which showed wind power density in the range of 200-300 watts/m2. This supports the conclusion that the Fall River region is generally in the wind power class rating of 2. Comparisons with Other Wind Resource Studies There are two other wind resource assessment studies that were conducted recently in the Fall River area. One was the Fall River Waste Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study and the other was the Lightolier Wind Turbine Project Feasibility Study. Both of these studies developed wind resource estimates based on meteorological data collected during a monitoring program

[4]

established for the projects. The Fall River Waste Water Treatment facility and the 50 meter meteorological tower used to collect data is located along the coastal region of Mount Hope Bay on the southern end of the Fall River urban center. The Lightolier site is situated further inland and meteorological data was collected on a pair of cellular towers just north of the site. The results from these studies support the classification of the Fall River region as generally Class 2 Wind Power Classifications. This classification is consistent with the available wind resource maps and through examination of the New Bedford and Borden Flats Light meteorological data. These studies found that New Bedford meteorological data was well correlated with data measured from the two sets of monitoring programs. However, note that the measured data at the Wastewater Treatment site is a coastal location and had higher average wind speeds than found at New Bedford even after the New Bedford data was scaled up to higher heights. This is likely due partly to the use of a wind shear exponent value of 0.17 at New Bedford. Conclusions and Recommendations The available wind resource maps, analysis of three years of meteorological data from the New Bedford ASOS site and the meteorological monitoring station at Borden Flats Light over Mount Hope Bay suggest the Fall River region generally has a rating of Class 2 wind power, which can be adequate for development of commercial wind in Massachusetts, though siting to maximize wind potential will be critical. The results point to the need to take three actions:

• Site turbines at a high elevation or adjacent to Mt Hope Bay to maximize wind resources that do exist. We strongly suggest Copicut Hill because of its elevation and avoidance of land use issues and setback limitations associated with the shoreline of Mt. Hope Bay that made siting at the sewage treatment plant problematic.

• Conduct a detailed financial analysis that takes into account local development costs and

revenues and state incentives to verify the economic viability of the project

• Assess wind resources in detail via a meteorological tower (preferably the Copicut Hill Site) Data from a properly sited and managed monitoring program will more accurately reflect the wind conditions at the selected site and this data can support a more refined and comprehensive wind resource assessment.

[5]

Table 1: Classes of Wind Power Density at 10 m and 50 m (a,b,c)

10m (33 ft) 50 m (164 ft) Wind

Power Class

Wind Power Density (W/m2)

Speed (c)

m/s (mph) Wind Power Density

(W/m2) Speed (c)

m/s (mph) 1 <100 <4.4 (9.8) <200 <5.6 (12.5)

2 100-150 4.4 (9.8)/5.1 (11.5) 200-300 5.6 (12.5)/6.4 (13.4)

3 150-200 5.1 (11.5)/5.6 (12.5) 300-400 6.4 (13.4)/ 7.0 (15.7)

4 200-250 5.6 (12.5)/6.0 (13.4) 400-500 7.0 (15.7)/7.5 (16.8)

5 250-300 6.0 (13.4)/6.4 (14.3) 500-600 7.5 (16.8)/8.0 (17.9)

6 300-400 6.4 (14.3)/7.0 (15.7) 600-800 8.0 (17.9)/8.8 (19.7)

7 >400 >7.0 (15.7) >800 >8.8 (19.7)

(a) Table from American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) (b) Vertical extrapolation of wind speed based on the 1/7 power law (c) Mean wind speed is based on the Rayleigh speed distribution of equivalent wind power

density, speed increases 3%/1000 m (5%/5000ft) of elevation. [from the Battelle Wind Energy Resources Atlas]

Table 2: Summary of Computed Three Year Average Wind Speed

Average Wind Speed (Watts/m2)

Meteorological Station

Station Name

Wind Measurement

Height (meters) Year

At measurement

Height 30

meters 50

meters 70

meters 100

meters 725065 New Bedford 7.9 2006 3.55 4.46 4.86 5.15 5.47

2007 3.57 4.48 4.89 5.17 5.50 2008 3.29 4.13 4.50 4.77 5.07

2006 to

2008 3.47 4.35 4.75 5.03 5.34 997273 Borden Flats Light 18 2006 4.87 5.14 5.60 5.93 6.31

2007 5.08 4.91 5.35 5.67 6.02 2008 3.52 3.84 4.19 4.44 4.72

2006 to

2008 4.42 4.60 5.01 5.31 5.64 Table 3: Summary of Computed Three Year Wind Power Density

Average Wind Speed (Watts/m2)

Meteorological Station Station Name

Wind Measurement

Height (meters)

At measurement

Height (meters) 30 meters 50 meters 70 meters 100 meters

725065 New Bedford 7.9 3.47 4.35 4.75 5.03 5.34 997273 Borden Flats Light 18 4.42 4.60 5.01 5.31 5.64

[6]

Figure 1. Portion of New England wind map showing annual mean wind speed at a

height of 50 meters. The wind map was developed by AWS TrueWind.

[7]

Figure 2. . Portion of New England wind map showing annual mean wind power density

(watts/m2) at a height of 50 meters. The wind map was developed by AWS TrueWind.

[8]

Figure 3. Google Earth photo showing the New Bedford ASOS site (station number

725065) and the Borden Flats Light station (Station number 997273).

[9]

Extracted Period: 01 Jan-2006, 12:00:00 AM To 31 Dec-2008, 11:00:00 PMNew Bedford Airport ASOS (Station 725065)

WSPEED hourly values

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

01/0

1/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

25/0

1/20

06, 0

6:00

:00

18/0

2/20

06, 1

2:00

:00

14/0

3/20

06, 1

8:00

:00

08/0

4/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

02/0

5/20

06, 0

6:00

:00

26/0

5/20

06, 1

2:00

:00

19/0

6/20

06, 1

8:00

:00

14/0

7/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

07/0

8/20

06, 0

6:00

:00

31/0

8/20

06, 1

2:00

:00

24/0

9/20

06, 1

8:00

:00

19/1

0/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

12/1

1/20

06, 0

6:00

:00

06/1

2/20

06, 1

2:00

:00

30/1

2/20

06, 1

8:00

:00

24/0

1/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

17/0

2/20

07, 0

6:00

:00

13/0

3/20

07, 1

2:00

:00

06/0

4/20

07, 1

8:00

:00

01/0

5/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

25/0

5/20

07, 0

6:00

:00

18/0

6/20

07, 1

2:00

:00

12/0

7/20

07, 1

8:00

:00

06/0

8/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

30/0

8/20

07, 0

6:00

:00

23/0

9/20

07, 1

2:00

:00

17/1

0/20

07, 1

8:00

:00

11/1

1/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

05/1

2/20

07, 0

6:00

:00

29/1

2/20

07, 1

2:00

:00

22/0

1/20

08, 1

8:00

:00

16/0

2/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

11/0

3/20

08, 0

6:00

:00

04/0

4/20

08, 1

2:00

:00

28/0

4/20

08, 1

8:00

:00

23/0

5/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

16/0

6/20

08, 0

6:00

:00

10/0

7/20

08, 1

2:00

:00

03/0

8/20

08, 1

8:00

:00

28/0

8/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

21/0

9/20

08, 0

6:00

:00

15/1

0/20

08, 1

2:00

:00

08/1

1/20

08, 1

8:00

:00

03/1

2/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

27/1

2/20

08, 0

6:00

:00

Hours

WSP

EED

(M

/S)

Extracted Period: 01 Jan-2006, 12:00:00 AM To 31 Dec-2008, 11:00:00 PMBorden Flats Light (Station 997273)

WSPEED hourly values

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

01/0

1/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

25/0

1/20

06, 0

8:00

:00

18/0

2/20

06, 1

6:00

:00

15/0

3/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

08/0

4/20

06, 0

8:00

:00

02/0

5/20

06, 1

6:00

:00

27/0

5/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

20/0

6/20

06, 0

8:00

:00

14/0

7/20

06, 1

6:00

:00

08/0

8/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

01/0

9/20

06, 0

8:00

:00

25/0

9/20

06, 1

6:00

:00

20/1

0/20

06, 0

0:00

:00

13/1

1/20

06, 0

8:00

:00

07/1

2/20

06, 1

6:00

:00

01/0

1/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

25/0

1/20

07, 0

8:00

:00

18/0

2/20

07, 1

6:00

:00

15/0

3/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

08/0

4/20

07, 0

8:00

:00

02/0

5/20

07, 1

6:00

:00

27/0

5/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

20/0

6/20

07, 0

8:00

:00

14/0

7/20

07, 1

6:00

:00

08/0

8/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

01/0

9/20

07, 0

8:00

:00

25/0

9/20

07, 1

6:00

:00

20/1

0/20

07, 0

0:00

:00

13/1

1/20

07, 0

8:00

:00

07/1

2/20

07, 1

6:00

:00

01/0

1/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

25/0

1/20

08, 0

8:00

:00

18/0

2/20

08, 1

6:00

:00

14/0

3/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

07/0

4/20

08, 0

8:00

:00

01/0

5/20

08, 1

6:00

:00

26/0

5/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

19/0

6/20

08, 0

8:00

:00

13/0

7/20

08, 1

6:00

:00

07/0

8/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

31/0

8/20

08, 0

8:00

:00

24/0

9/20

08, 1

6:00

:00

19/1

0/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

12/1

1/20

08, 0

8:00

:00

06/1

2/20

08, 1

6:00

:00

31/1

2/20

08, 0

0:00

:00

Hours

WSP

EED

(M

/S)

Figure 4. Time series plot of hourly wind speed at New Bedford (top) and Borden Flats

Light (bottom) for the period January 2006-December 2008.

[10]

Figure 5. Three-year wind roses for New Bedford (left) and Borden Flats Light (right).

[11]

Figure 6. Time series of three-year average wind speed by hour of day showing average diurnal wind speed changes at both New Bedford (top) and Borden Flats Light (bottom).

[12]

Extracted Period: 01 Jan-2006, 12:00:00 AM To 31 Dec-2008, 11:00:00 PMNew Bedford Airport ASOS (Station 725065)

WSPEED annual diurnal plot

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

WSP

EED

(M

/S)

0

1

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hours

Extracted Period: 01 Jan-2006, 12:00:00 AM To 31 Dec-2008, 11:00:00 PMBorden Flats Light (Station 997273)

WSPEED diurnal plot

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hours

WSP

EED

(M

/S)

Attachments for MA CED grant, FROED, Fall River

Documents

Transcript of Attachments for MA CED grant, FROED, Fall River