ATP ADP + Pi The Next Frontier in ADME Science: Predicting ... · ATP ADP + Pi 2 GAPS in ADME: Drug...
Transcript of ATP ADP + Pi The Next Frontier in ADME Science: Predicting ... · ATP ADP + Pi 2 GAPS in ADME: Drug...
ATP ADP + Pi
Jashvant (Jash) UnadkatMilo Gibaldi Endowed Professor
Dept. of PharmaceuticsSchool of Pharmacy
University of WashingtonSeattle, WA
The Next Frontier in ADME Science: Predicting and Verifying Tissue Drug Exposure
https://sop.washington.edu/people/jashvant-unadkat/
ATP ADP + Pi
2
GAPS in ADME: Drug Development Failure Rate and Reasons
Smietana et al., Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 15, 379–380 (2016) Harrison, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 15, 817–818 (2016)
ATP ADP + Pi
One Possible Reason for Lack of Drug Efficacy & Safety
• Unable to routinely measure (or accurately predict) tissue drug conc.-time profile for drugs that are transported across tissue:blood barrier
• Transporters at the tissue:blood barrier (e.g. blood:brain barrier, BBB, liver:blood barrier)– Unbound tissue conc ≠ unbound plasma conc. i.e. asymmetry in
tissue:blood conc. – Impact differs between non-eliminating (e.g. brain) and
eliminating organ (e.g. liver)3
4Eyal et al., Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010
Time (min)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Brain
11C-
radioa
ctivit
y / D
ose (
L-1)
0.01
↑~2-fold
Time (min)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Plasm
a 11C-
radioa
ctivit
y / D
ose (
L-1 )
0.01
0.1Plasma
Brain
- CsA + CsA
+ CsA -CsA
Asymmetry in Drug Conc. at the Human Brain:Blood Barrier: P-gpEfflux of 11C-Verapamil
11C-verapamil AUCbrain:AUCblood (20 min) - 0.42±0.04
ATP ADP + Pi
Asymmetry in Hepatic:Blood Conc. of 11C-Rosuvastatin in the Rat
5
Coronal 2 min SUV images of 11C-Rosuvastatin
He et al., Mol Pharm., ‘14
BileBlood
ROS
Hepatocyte
OATPsBCRP/MRP2
-RIF +RIF
ATP ADP + Pi
Hepatic Uptake and Biliary Excretion of 11C-Rosuvastatin in the Rat
6He et al., Mol Pharm., ‘14
ATP ADP + Pi
Asymmetrical change in rosuvastatin conc. in liver and blood in the presence of rifampin
7He et al., Mol Pharm. 2014
2.3-fold increase in plasma AUC but no significant increase in liver
AUC
Rat Blood Rat Liver
% o
f Dos
e
% o
f Dos
e
Time (min)
Time (min)
OATPs
BileBlood
ROS
Hepatocyte
BCRP/MRP2
ATP ADP + Pi
Aorta
L KidneyR Kidney
Liver
Gallbladder
Aorta
L KidneyR Kidney
Liver
Gallbladder
RSV
[11C]Rosuvastatin biodistribution in a human volunteer
8
ATP ADP + Pi
1 min 5 min 10 min 30 min
0
400
RSV
RSV
+ CS
A
GallBladder
GallBladder
LiverLiverLiverLiver
LiverLiverLiverLiver
Hepatic Uptake and Biliary Excretion of [11C]Rosuvastatin ± CsA
9
ATP ADP + Pi
How Can we Predict/Measure Tissue Drug Conc. and Tissue:Blood Asymmetry in Humans? One could actually measure tissue drug conc:• PET imaging (MRI and other imaging modalities do not have the required
sensitivity):– Requires sophisticated equipment and radiochemistry – Costly (about $20-40K/experiment/subject)
• Therefore we need alternative methods that will allow us to predict tissue conc. of drugs in humans– Predict all clearances associated with the tissue:blood barrier– Possible using REF but not RAF approach
10
OATPs
Hepatocyte
BCRP/MRP2
ATP ADP + Pi
11
In vitro CLCL via transport of interest in cell line expressing the
transporter
Relative Expression Factor (REF)1. Transporter expression/g of
tissue 2. Tissue weight
In vivo CLContribution of individual
transporter in tissue uptake/efflux
REF = [T]ex vivo in organ
[T]in vitro
REF Method to Predict Tissue Drug Conc.Hypothesis: Predict tissue drug conc. by scaling in vitro CL in transporter expressing cells to in vivo using relative expression factor (REF)
ATP ADP + Pi
• https://sop.washington.edu/department-of-pharmaceutics/research/research-affiliate-program-on-transporters-uwrapt/
ATP ADP + Pi
Can the use of these Quantitative Proteomics Data Successfully Predict Transporter-
Mediated CL and Tissue Conc. of Drugs?
12
• Changes due to hepatic impairment (e.g. chirrohsis)
• Renal secretory CL of drugs
• Hepatic CL and tissue conc. of drugs – rat and human
Criteria of success: within 2-fold of observed value
ATP ADP + Pi
Improved PBPK Prediction of Repaglinide Pharmacokinetics in Liver Cirrhosis Patients When the Effect of Cirrhosis on
OATP1B1 Abundance is Incorporated
13
Without
0.1
1
10
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Syst
emic
co
ncen
tratio
n (n
g/m
L)
Time (h)
Virtual population (10 trials and n=12 for each trial)
With
0.1
1
10
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Syst
emic
co
ncen
tratio
n (n
g/m
L)
Time (h)
Wang et al., DMD, 2016
ATP ADP + Pi
Metformin renal clearance is reasonably well-predicted using OCT2 expressing
cells
Kumar et al., DMD 2018
14
Observed metformin renal secretory clearance in humans: 432 (range 215-643) mL/min
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Total abundance PM abundance PM abundance andPM potential
Met
form
in re
nal s
ecre
tory
cle
aran
ce
(mL/
min
)
215
643
432
ATP ADP + PiATP ADP + Pi
Renal Secretory CL by OATs: RAF vs. REF
15
• 31 drugs secreted by renal OATs• RAF used tenofovir (OAT1), acyclovir and ganciclovir (OAT2), and benzylpenicillin/oseltamivir acid
(OAT3) as probe substrates • REF used quantitative proteomics data on renal OATs in human kidney cortex and transfected cells
which were also used to determine in vitro uptake CL of the drugs.
Collaboration with Manthena Varma (Pfizer)
ATP ADP + PiATP ADP + Pi
Hypothesis: Predict Transporter-Mediated In-Vivo Hepatobiliary CL and Hepatic Concentrations of Drugs
in Rats/Humans using REF
16
Predict in-vivohepatobiliary CLusing REF and traditional approach
1. transporter-mediated drug CL2. transporter abundance using
quantitative proteomics3. Obtain REF
Transporter-expressing cells
Verify predictions using PET imaging
ATP ADP + Pi
REF (using HEK293 cells or PHH) better predicts Hepatic Uptake CL of metformin (as measured by PET imaging) vs. PHH
Gormsen, et al., J NuclMed 57(12): 1920-1926.
FF (Blood
radioactivity)
Liver
Cl h,s,in
Cl s, efflux
17M
GP
GL
ba
se
d I
VIV
E C
Lh
,s,i
n
A D RF E A
JE LY T W
A v e rag e
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0In vivo CLh,s,in
Human Hepatocytes
RF
E b
as
ed
IV
IVE
CL
h,s
,in
H E K 2 9 3 ce lls
A D RF E A
JE LY T W
A v e rag e
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
8 0 0
1 0 0 0
T o ta l a b u n d a n d a n c e b a s e d
P M A c o rre c te d
In vivo CLh,s,in
REF approach
ATP ADP + Pi
Hepatic Uptake and Biliary Excretion of 11C-Rosuvastatin in the Rat
18
Coronal 2 min SUV images of 11C-Rosuvastatin
He et al., Mol Pharm., ‘14
BileBlood
ROS
Hepatocyte
OATPsBCRP/MRP2
-RIF +RIF
ATP ADP + Pi
0
20
40
60
80
Clea
ranc
e (m
L/m
in/k
g bo
dy w
eigh
t)
Previous PET imagingstudy
SCRH not corrected forOatp expression
p<0.05
CLs,uptake CLs,efflux CLbile
Successful prediction of the hepatobiliary clearance of rosuvastatin using cell lines, sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes and quantitative proteomics
CLs,uptake; sinusoidal uptakeCLs,efflux; sinusoidal effluxCLbile; canalicular efflux
0
2
4
6
8
10
Oat
p ex
pres
sion
(fmol
/µg
mem
bran
e pr
otei
n)
SD rat liverSCRH
p<0.05
p<0.05p<0.05
Ishida et al., DMD, 2018 19
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
CLs,
upta
ke(m
L/m
in/k
g bo
dy w
eigh
t)
ATP ADP + Pi
Rat Hepatic Rosuvastatin Conc. well Predicted
20Ishida et al., DMD 2018
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 3 6 9 12 15
Hepa
tic c
once
ntra
tion
(kBq
/mL)
Time (min)
Observed valuepredicted value95% CI of observed data
Can Rosuvastatin Hepatobiliary CL and Hepatic Conc. be Predicted in Humans?
21
ATP ADP + PiATP ADP + Pi
Total transporter abundance in suspended (SH), plated (PH), sandwich-cultured (SCH) hepatocytes and liver tissue
22
Kumar et al., DMD 2019
ATP ADP + PiATP ADP + Pi
Plasma membrane transporter abundance in suspended (SH), plated (PH), sandwich-cultured (SCH) hepatocytes cf liver tissue
Kumar et al., DMD 2019
23
ATP ADP + Pi
• Predicting transporter-mediated CL & tissue concentrations and therefore efficacy and toxicity of a drug is the next frontier in ADME research
• The hepatic ECL model clarifies when transporters will or will not affect the systemic and tissue PK of a drug
• Tissue conc. measurement is possible using PET. However, this method cannot be routinely applied
• IVIVE using transfected cells and quantitative transporter proteomics is a promising technique to predict tissue drug conc
• These predictions should be validated using PET imaging probes that interrogate multiple drug transporters
24
Summary
ATP ADP + Pi
Bhagwat Prasad Anand Deo25
YuYang Jiake He
Major Contributors
Sarah Billington
Li WangGabriela Patilea-Vrana
Kazuya IshidaVineet Kumar
ATP ADP + Pi
Other CollaboratorsDept. of Radiology: Jeanne Link, David Mankoff, Todd Richards, Janet Eary, Satoshi Minoshima, Ken Maravilla, Mark Muzi, Steve Shoner, Shirely Rene, David Lewis, Jean Lee and the PET suite teamDept. of Medicine: Ann Collier and her team; Scott Lee and his team Dept. of Anesthesiology: Karen Domino, Matthew PenningtonDept. of Pharmaceutics: Bhagwat Prasad, Edward Kelly, Carol Collins, Joanne Wang Kidney Research Institute: Jonathan HimmelfarbUniv. of Greifswald: Stefan Oswald and teamChildren’s Mercy Hospitals: Steven Leeder and teamAarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Dr. Gormsen
Acknowledgement: NIH P01DA032507, MH63641, P50 HD44404, RR 00166, HD47892, AG031485, RC1NS068904, BioIVT, Solvo Biotech., UWRAPT funded by Genentech, Merck, Biogen, Gilead, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Amgen
26
ATP ADP + Pi
27