arX

iv:1

208.

4908

v1 [

astr

o-ph

.SR

] 2

4 A

ug 2

012

Draft version June 13, 2018Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11

NONLINEAR ASTEROSEISMOLOGY OF RRLYRAE

L. Molnar1, Z. Kollath1, R. Szabo1, S. Bryson2, K. Kolenberg3,4, F. Mullally2,5, S. E. Thompson2,5

Draft version June 13, 2018

ABSTRACT

The observations of the Kepler space telescope revealed that fundamental-mode RRLyrae starsmay show various radial overtones. The presence of multiple radial modes may allow us to conductnonlinear asteroseismology: comparison of mode amplitudes and frequency shifts between observationsand models. Here we report the detection of three radial modes in the star RRLyr, the eponym of theclass, using the Kepler short cadence data: besides the fundamental mode, both the first and the ninthovertones can be derived from the data set. RRLyrae shows period doubling, but switches occasionallyto a state where a pattern of six pulsation cycles repeats instead of two. We found hydrodynamicmodels that show the same three modes and the period-six state, allowing for comparison with theobservations.Subject headings: stars: individual (RR Lyr) — stars: variables: RR Lyrae — stars: oscillations

1. INTRODUCTION

The precise and continuous observations of the Keplerspace telescope (Borucki et al. 2010) revealed a wealthof new features in RRLyrae stars. Among the first dis-coveries was the detection of period doubling in threestars, including RRLyrae itself (Kolenberg et al. 2010;Szabo et al. 2010). Additional frequencies in the Fouriertransform, significant frequency components beside theusual RRLyrae pattern (main period, its harmonics,modulation sidelobes and the Blazhko-modulation fre-quency) were also detected in several stars (Benko et al.2010; Guggenberger et al. 2012). Out of these new fea-tures, the period doubling phenomenon, the alternationof a higher and a lower amplitude pulsation cycle, hasbeen successfully modeled. Our hydrodynamic calcula-tions revealed that a high-order, 9:2 resonance can oc-cur between the fundamental mode and the 9th radialovertone strange mode that leads to the period-doublingbifurcation (Kollath et al. 2011). These results were alsoconfirmed by Smolec et al. (2011).However, the nature of the additional frequencies is

not fully understood yet, except for the ninth over-tone which is related to the half-integer peaks andcauses the period doubling. Some of the remainingpeaks fall into the ranges where the first or secondradial overtones are expected, but several stars dis-play even more peaks, possibly indicating non-radialmodes (Benko et al. 2010; Guggenberger et al. 2012).Additional modes were also detected in stars observedby the CoRoT space telescope (Chadid et al. 2010;Poretti et al. 2010; Guggenberger et al. 2011). The starsshowing first or second overtone signals are unlike theusual double-mode RRd pulsators. The additional com-

molnar.laszlo@csfk.mta.hu1 Konkoly Observatory, MTA CSFK, H-1121 Budapest,

Konkoly Thege Miklos ut 15-17., Hungary2 NASA Ames Research Center, MS 244-30, Moffet Field, CA

94035, USA3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden

St., Cambridge MA 02138 USA4 Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D,

3001 Heverlee, Belgium5 SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Ave Suite 100, Mountain View,

CA 94043, USA

ponents fall into the mmag range so the amplitude ratiosare extreme.Furthermore, almost all stars that show additional

modes are Blazhko-variables. Only two stars have beenfound in the Kepler sample that show a small secondovertone with only traces of modulation down to themmag level (Benko et al. 2010; Nemec et al. 2011). Onthe other hand, about half of the modulated stars inthe Kepler sample show additional peaks in the Fourierspectrum, often together with signs of period doubling.Period doubling itself is not a regular process: it is mod-ulated and sometimes shows signatures of additional bi-furcations. The variations do not necessarily follow theBlazhko-modulation either (Szabo et al. 2010). There-fore it is necessary to investigate the origins of thosevariations.

2. KEPLER PHOTOMETRY OF RRLYRAE

RRLyr (KIC 7198959) is one of the brightest starsobserved by Kepler among its asteroseismology targets(Gilliland et al. 2010). It was observed in long cadencemode in Kepler quarters 1 and 2 (or Q1 and Q2), with29.4-minute sampling. Kolenberg et al. (2011) provideda detailed description of the photometry and the nec-essary corrections applied. The brightness of RRLyrwas initially underestimated in the Kepler Input Cata-log (KIC) and some flux was lost from the less-than-idealaperture. However, the corrected average brightness re-sulted in an assigned automatic aperture that extendedbeyond the edge of the CCD module and so the pipelinerejected the star in quarters 3 and 4. A custom aperturehad to be developed for the star instead and it is beingused from quarter 5 onwards. RRLyrae was observedthrough the Kepler Guest Observer Program6 in shortcadence mode (1 minute sampling) both in Q5 and Q6.Maxima of the pulsation cycles had to be determined

for our analysis. For the long cadence data, we reusedthe maxima derived from ninth-order polynomials fittedin Szabo et al. (2010). For the short cadence data wecalculated spline solutions instead of polynomials. Longcadence data are less well suited to determine the sharp

6 http://keplergo.arc.nasa.gov/

2 Molnar et al.

7.15

7.2

7.25

7.3

7.35

7.4

7.45

7.5

7.55

7.6 55380 55390 55400 55410 55420 55430 55440 55450 55460

Kp

mag

nitu

de

BJD-2400000 [d]

P6 set

80

84

88

92

0 3 6 9 12

Time [d]

L [L

Sun

]

Fig. 1.— Short cadence Q6 data of RRLyrae. Light grey points are the brighter end of the light curve. Black and dark grey (blueand orange in the color version) lines connect the maxima of even and odd pulsation cycles respectively. In the case of the period-sixvisualization (shifted by 0.15 mag), every sixth maxima are connected, such as black/blue lines connect the 6k, 6k + 2 and 6k + 4 points(circles), while grey/orange lines connect the 6k + 1, 6k + 3 and 6k + 5 points (dots) where k = 0, 1, 2. . . . The period-six-like sections areindicated with the grey boxes: we identified two occurrences between 55385.3-55406.3 and 55436.9-55448.3. Dashed lines mark the P6 setwhich we analyzed separately (see Figure 3). The insert shows the calculated luminosity of a model solution close to the 3:4 resonance.Note the similarity of the crossings between the individual blue and orange lines or branches. Model parameters (αν is the eddy viscosityparameter) are: M = 0.64M⊙, L = 45L⊙, Teff = 6500K, αν = 0.0175. The insert covers the same time span as the P6 section.

maxima of RRLyrae-type variations, but we found theresults satisfactory for further analysis.

2.1. Analysis of the photometry

In principle, return maps would be very useful toanalyze the variations in period doubling detected inRRLyrae stars. Return maps are powerful tools toexamine the overall dynamics of a system by plot-ting the successive values of a selected property againsteach other, e.g. the maximum values of the cycles of a(multi)periodic signal. On a return map, single-modeoscillation is represented by a single dot (no change),period doubling by two dots (small and large cycles),and double-mode pulsation is either a discrete numberof points or a continuous loop, depending on whetherthe period ratio is commensurate or not. Return mapscan provide an easier way to detect these features thanconventional Fourier transforms as FTs of RRLyrae vari-ations are dominated by the harmonic peaks of the mainperiod and may contain many linear combination peaks.In the case of Blazhko-variables however, the modu-

lation will dominate over almost any other feature. Soinstead of creating a return map, we simply plotted themaxima of even and odd pulsation cycles respectively(blue and orange lines in Figure 1) in the light curveagainst time. If the period doubling is constant, the twolines should never cross each other.However, the pulsation of RRLyr is much more com-

plicated. The period doubling is omnipresent, contraryto the first implications from the LC data (Szabo et al.2010), but it is clearly not constant. The most curi-ous phenomenon occurs—coincidentally—in Q6, the 6thquarter of Kepler observations, between BJD 55388 and

55400 (we refer to this section of the light curve as theP6 set, see Figure 1). An up-down bounce in each armof period doubling is evident, indicating a possible addi-tional bifurcation. Only if we connect every sixth max-ima instead of every second can we smooth out most ofthe variations between successive maxima. Here the fun-damental mode shows “period-six” behavior, i.e. a pat-tern of six cycles instead of two seems to be repeating.We found one more possible case and an extension tothe P6 set where the pulsation temporarily shows tracesof period-six behavior, indicated by the grey boxes onFigure 1. Outside the boxes, both visualizations (ev-ery second or sixth maxima) are dominated by perioddoubling, confirming the temporal nature of the period-six phenomenon. Reanalysis of the Q1-Q2 data suggestsperiod-six pattern at the second half of Q1 and the be-ginning of Q2 but the gap between the quarters hampersthe detection.The period-six behavior can originate from a resonance

if two modes are involved in the variation. A resonancewith the first overtone with a period ratio of 3:4 (0.75)would be plausible for example, compared to the pe-riod ratio range of double-mode RRLyrae stars (Petersen1973). We note in passing that it would be more cor-rect to describe this resonance as 6:8 as the presence ofthe period doubling requires six pulsation cycles to re-peat the pattern. Another possible mechanism is a pe-riodic window in a chaotic regime. A period bifurcationcascade was indeed followed up to period-eight solutionsin Kollath et al. (2011), but we have not found modelsyet where the period-doubling instability alone reachedchaos. It is much more likely that the period-six behavioris connected to a resonance between the period-doubled

RRLyrae asteroseismology 3

0

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Am

plitu

de [K

p m

ag]

frequency [d-1]

9/2 f0

Fig. 2.— Amplitudes of the highest half-integer peaks at every(2n+1)/2f0 value (blue points). The Fourier-spectrum of the Q5-Q6 data, prewithened with the nf0 peaks, is shown in grey. Thereis an excess at 9/2f0, at the position of the ninth overtone, similarlyto Fig. 8 in Szabo et al. (2010).

fundamental mode and another overtone (which configu-ration itself can be a periodic window of stability betweenthree-mode chaotic solutions).

2.2. The presence of the first radial overtone inRRLyrae

The analysis of the Q1–Q2 data of RR Lyr did notreveal any additional peaks beyond the half-integer fre-quencies (Kolenberg et al. 2011). The sign of the ninthovertone, locked in the 9:2 resonance, was detected inthose data as an excess at 9/2f0 (Szabo et al. 2010), andit is present in the Q5–Q6 short cadence data set too(Figure 2).However, at least two significant peaks are also de-

tectable in the expected range of the first overtone in theQ5-Q6 data, at f = 2.327 and 2.342 d−1, with amplituderatios (A0/A1, the ratio comparing the amplitude of thef0 peak of the fundamental mode to the f1 peak(s)) be-ing 155 and 170, respectively. The presence of multiplepeaks indicate amplitude variations and quite possiblyphase variations as well. If analyzed separately, the Q5and Q6 data result in somewhat different values, withA0/A1 = 138 and 102 for a sole significant peak. Thespectrum of the P6 set (lower panel in Figure 3) showsa stronger signal with A0/A1 = 67. The amplitudes arelimited to a few mmags in all subsets, but thanks to thephotometric precision, the individual peaks have signal-to-noise ratios of at least 4–6, the lowest values corre-sponding to the spectrum of the Q5 data only, where wedid not detect period-six-like stages.Period ratios (or f0/f1 frequency ratios) vary between

0.753-0.758 for the different subsets and/or peaks: forthe P6 set it is 0.756. These ratios are close to, but notexactly 0.750, the value corresponding to a 3:4 resonance.The period ratio difference might arise from the uncer-tainty in the frequency determination, either caused bythe frequency variations connected to the Blazhko effector, in the case of the P6 set, the shortness of the dataset. But it is more likely that the system temporarily ap-proaches the vicinity of the resonance and the frequencydifference reflects the distance from it. An additional

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Am

plitu

de [K

p m

ag]

frequency [d-1]

f1

f0

3/2 f0

fB

Q5-Q6

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Am

plitu

de [K

p m

ag]

frequency [d-1]

f1

f0

3/2 f0

P6 set

Fig. 3.— Detection of the first overtone (f1) in the Kepler mea-surements of RRLyr. The original spectra are in grey and thespectra prewhitened with the main frequency (f0) and its harmon-ics (nf0) are in black (blue in the color version). The upper panelshows the entire Q5–Q6 data while the lower panel shows only theP6 set from Q6 (see Figure 1). A forest of peaks is evident at 3/2f0in the upper panel, indicating the strong variability of the perioddoubling.

mode with the same ratio (0.754) was detected in UZVir too (Sodor et al. 2012).This is the first time that three radial modes have been

unambiguously detected in an RRLyrae star: the funda-mental, the first overtone and the third being the ninthovertone which is responsible for the period doubling.The detection is also strongly supported by the nonlin-ear models, described below. It is also clear howeverthat the inclusion of period doubling and the first over-tone still does not describe the light variations of RRLyr perfectly. The two branches of the period doublingcross each other and reverse, with intervals ranging froma few pulsation periods to about 30 days which is close toan entire Blazhko-period (∼ 39 days). These variationscould be explained by yet another, physically relevantfrequency close to the half-integer peaks (as it modulatesthe period doubling), or could be internal variability, asfound in BL Herculis models (Smolec & Moskalik 2012).

3. MODEL CALCULATIONS

The modulations and possible bifurcations in perioddoubling raise further questions regarding the dynam-ics of the system. To study the the possible pro-cesses that might be responsible for this dynamical be-havior we conducted a broad nonlinear model survey

4 Molnar et al.

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96

Lum

inos

tym

ax (

k+2)

[LS

un]

Luminositymax (k) [LSun]

Fig. 4.— First return map of a three-mode model. The figureshows maxima of the luminosity variations plotted against eachother. Here we show the maxima of the kth versus the (k + 2)thcycles instead of successive ones to separate the smaller and largercycles of period doubling. Although three radial modes are present,the ninth overtone is locked in a resonance with the fundamentalmode, and it is only detectable through the presence of perioddoubling, hence we observe two loops instead of a single one, bothrepresenting the double-mode pulsation between incommensuratef0 and f1 frequencies. Model parameters are the same as in Figure1.with the Florida-Budapest turbulent convective hydro-dynamic code (Kollath & Buchler 2001; Kollath et al.2002). The results of this survey will be published ina subsequent paper (Kollath et al., in prep.), here weonly summarize the relevant facts.We found that period doubling changes the stability

of the fundamental mode. The mode in itself is stableagainst the perturbations of the first overtone, but unsta-ble against the ninth overtone and the period-doublingbifurcation occurs. The period-doubled mode is, how-ever, unstable (or at least marginally stable) againstthe perturbations of the first overtone. The result is anew pulsation state that looks like a new kind of dou-ble mode behavior but is in fact created by the inter-action of three different radial modes. In some of themodels, this two-period state bifurcates further to res-onant or chaotic solutions. Detailed properties of thesemodels, their occurrence along the instability strip willbe investigated in forthcoming papers. We note thatthe two chaotic model solutions that were analyzed byPlachy et al. (2012) turned out to be three-mode solu-tions as well.The various dynamical states are best to represent with

return maps. In case of simple period doubling, we willhave two dots, corresponding to the lower and higheramplitude cycles. If two different modes are present, thereturn map will either show a set of points or a loop,depending on the phase relations (e.g. are the two modesin resonance or not).Take for example the two loops in Figure 4 which is the

same model as in the insert in Figure 1. The presenceof a loop at lower values and another at higher valuesindicate that both period doubling and an additional pe-riodicity is present in this system, a state that resemblesthe Kepler observations of RRLyrae.

3.1. Comparison with the models

The detection of three different radial modes in an RRLyrae star may allow for nonlinear asteroseismic stud-ies: comparison of the observations not only with linear

pulsation periods but also with mode amplitudes, reso-nances and frequency shifts.Our first calculations focused on the possible 3:4 res-

onance. The corresponding 0.750 period ratio, and es-pecially the exact observed period ratios in RRLyr be-tween the first overtone and the fundamental mode area challenge: they lie at the edge of the accessible rangefor the classical double-mode pulsation in the Petersen-diagram (see Fig. 6 in Szabo et al. (2004)). We have notsucceeded in finding models with an exact 3:4 resonanceyet, though we found resonant solutions with higher inte-gers corresponding to lower period ratios. These modelscan help to identify possible (near-)resonances betweenthe fundamental mode and the first overtone in otherRRLyrae stars.However, models with a linear period ratio of 0.747 in-

stead of 0.750 do in fact approach the vicinity of the 3:4resonance. These calculations indicate that RRLyr onlyapproaches the resonance during the period-six phasesbut does not lock into it. Although the models favor so-lutions below the 0.750 frequency ratio instead of above(as in the case of RRLyr), the topology, like the dis-tances and crossings of the six branches are quite similar,especially in the P6 section (see insert in Figure 1) andsupport our findings. Swapping of either three branchessimultaneously was not observed in the models, confirm-ing that yet another mechanism must be behind some ofthe remaining features, like the modulation of the perioddoubling.We also note that the difference between linear and

nonlinear period ratios in the models approaches 0.003and sometimes (especially in resonant states) up to 0.005.This nonlinear shift is comparable to the observed periodratio range of the Petersen-diagram of the normal double-mode RR Lyrae (RRd) stars.

4. SUMMARY

The detection of so many interesting features in astar of long observational history remarkably illustratesthe advantages of space-based photometry. A decadeago, Smith et al. (2003) noted that the residuals afterfitting the primary components of the spectrum (thetriplet at the fundamental mode, their harmonics andthe modulation frequency) exceeded the expected obser-vational error. The first observations of Kepler revealedthe period-doubling phenomenon (Kolenberg et al. 2010;Szabo et al. 2010) and now the first overtone was alsodetected in the short cadence data. The results and im-plications of the analysis can be summarized as follows:

• Three different radial modes were detected inRRLyr, the eponym of its class: the funda-mental mode and the first and ninth overtone.However, the ninth overtone is locked in a reso-nance with the fundamental mode and can be de-tected only through the presence of period doubling(Kollath et al. 2011), causing the observed varia-tions to resemble double-mode behavior.

• The first overtone has a very small amplitude (fewmmags), in contrast with the fundamental modeor the classical double-mode RRd stars, explainingthe non-detection from the ground.

RRLyrae asteroseismology 5

• A state resembling period-six bifurcation was de-tected in the light variations of RRLyr. This be-havior is most likely caused when the system ap-proaches the vicinity of a 3:4 resonance betweenthe fundamental mode and the first overtone.

• We have been able to reproduce the three-modestate in nonlinear hydrodynamic models. Althoughwe have not been able to model the 3:4 resonanceor the higher than 0.750 period ratio of RRLyr,the amplitude ratios can be reproduced and higher-order resonances have been found as well. Further-more, near-resonance models below the 0.750 valuehave very similar characteristics, raising the hopesfor applying nonlinear asteroseismology to BlazhkoRRLyrae stars.

• Even the inclusion of three different modes can-not explain all the variations we see in the perioddoubling, indicating that the pulsation of RRLyraestars may be even more complex.

Our radial nonlinear hydrodynamic calculationsdemonstrated that the period-doubled fundamentalmode may lose its stability with respect to the first radialovertone. Then it is straightforward to expect similarnonlinear destabilization with respect to low order nonra-dial modes as well. This process might provide the back-ground for the fact that additional pulsation frequenciesoccur more frequently in stars where period doubling isalso detected. First overtone signals were identified inthree other stars in the Kepler sample by Benko et al.(2010), and the case of RRLyr suggests that more may bediscovered. The period ratios of peaks that can be plau-sibly associated with the first overtone are for V354 Lyr(KIC 6183128): f1/f0 = 0.729, and for V360 Lyr (KIC9697825): f1/f0 = 0.721. For V445 Lyr (KIC 6186029),

Benko et al. (2010) noted a very complex pattern ofpeaks while the detailed analysis of Guggenberger et al.(2012) concluded that among the additional frequen-cies, two can be found at ratios fN/f0 = 0.703 andf0/f1 = 0.730. Even more stars show the signature ofthe second overtone for which Molnar et al. (2012) al-ready proposed the alternate idea of a three-mode reso-nance, where the equation 3f0 + f2 = f9 may describethe relation between the three frequencies.The results indicate that interactions between radial

and nonradial modes may indeed play a more crucialrole in the pulsation of stars. Buchler & Kollath (2011)showed that the resonance responsible for period dou-bling can cause Blazhko-like modulation in amplitudeequations. Nonlinear asteroseismology promises to un-derstand these new findings, and might even help to un-lock the mystery of the Blazhko effect itself.

Funding for this Discovery Mission is provided byNASA’s Science Mission Directorate. The Kepler Teamand the Kepler Guest Observer Office are recognizedfor helping to make the mission and these data possi-ble. This work was supported by the Hungarian OTKAgrants K83790, K81421 and MB08C 81013, as well asthe ‘Lendulet’ programme, and the European Commu-nity’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)under grant agreement no. 269194. RSz acknowledgesthe Bolyai Janos Scholarship of the Hungarian Academyof Sciences. KK is supported by a Marie Curie In-ternational Outgoing Fellowship within the 7th Euro-pean Community Framework Programme. RSz and KKwarmly thank the KITP staff of UCSB for their hospi-tality during the ”Asteroseismology in the Space Age”programme. This research was supported in part bythe National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSFPHY05-51164.Facilities: Kepler ().

REFERENCES

Benko, J. M., Kolenberg, K., Szabo, R. et al., 2010, MNRAS, 409,1585

Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G. et al., 2010, Science, 327, 977Buchler, J. R., Kollath, Z., 2011, ApJ, 731, 24Chadid, M., Benko, J. M., Szabo, R. et al., 2010, A&A, 510, 39Gilliland R. L., Brown, T. M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. et al.,

2010, PASP, 122, 131Guggenberger, E., Kolenberg, K., Chapellier, E. et al., 2011,

MNRAS, 415, 1577Guggenberger, E., Kolenberg, K., Nemec, J. M. et al., 2012,

MNRAS, 424, 649Kolenberg, K., Szabo, R., Kurtz, D. et al., 2010, ApJ, 713, L198Kolenberg, K., Bryson, S., Szabo, R. et al., 2011, MNRAS, 411,

878Kollath Z., Buchler J. R., 2001, in Stellar Pulsation – Nonlinear

Studies, Eds.: M. Takeuti and D. D. Sasselov, Astrophysics andSpace Science Library Series vol. 257, pp. 29-60, KluwerAcademic Publishers, Dordrecht, astro-ph/0003386v1

Kollath Z., Buchler J. R., Szabo R., Csubry Z., 2002, A&A, 385,932

Kollath, Z., Molnar, L., Szabo, R., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1111Molnar, L., Kollath, Z., Szabo, R., 2012, ASSP, in press

(arXiv:1201.5628v1)Nemec, J. M, Smolec, R. Benko, J. M. et al 2011, MNRAS, 417,

1022Petersen, J. O., A&A, 1973, 27, 89Plachy, E., Kollath, Z., Molnar, L., 2012, ASSP, in press

(arXiv:1202.0271v1)Poretti, E., Paparo, M., Deleuil, M. et al., 2010, A&A, 520, 108

Smith, H., Church, J. A., Fournier, J. et al., 2003, PASP, 115, 43Smolec, R., Moskalik, P, Kolenberg, K. et al., 2011, MNRAS, 414,

2950Smolec, R., Moskalik, P, 2012,MNRAS, in press

(arXiv:1207.2151v1)

Sodor, A, Hajdu, G., Jurcsik, J., Szeidl, B., Poszotbanyi, K.,Hurta, Zs., Belucz, B., Kun E., 2012, MNRAS, in press(arXiv:1208.0139v1)

Szabo, R., Kollath, Z., Buchler, J. R., 2004, A&A, 425, 627Szabo, R., Kollath, Z., Molnar L. et al., 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1244