Aston University
-
Upload
brady-sutton -
Category
Documents
-
view
34 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Aston University
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Aston University
Engaging Academic staff in Technology Enhanced Learning
in a Research Intensive University
Dr Jacqueline Dempster
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
My outline:
Research-led context for TEL
Approaches to engaging staff
First goals …
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Being strategic about TEL …
the individual
the ‘academic team’
the department & the discipline
Research intensive priorities
Changing academic needs & roles
Leadership and management
Infrastructure & application of ICT
Quality & standards
Linking research with teaching excellence
Curriculum innovation & pedagogic distinctiveness
Personal effectiveness & job satisfaction.
the technologies & the tools
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Hooks for engagement
“When the winds of change blow, some build walls while
others build windmills”(Ancient proverb)
•Academics are under immense pressure:
• Research imperative
• Teaching quality audits
• Technological pace & opportunities
• Student expectations
• Employer expectations
•Some academics capitalize on the possibilities to innovate with TEL.
•Most are unable to accomplish real curriculum impacts without substantial long-term learning design support.
•A few are disengaged & disinterested.
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
To be successful – approaches to engagement in TEL need to be:
Integrated Strategic Practical Scholarly Fun!
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
How can this be achieved?
“…what is needed is … the reinvention of cultures.”
(Taylor, 1998)
Successful embedding of any educational innovation centres on four key approaches (Dempster & Deepwell, 2007)
Vision and personal credentials of individuals, groups & relationships Academic freedom underpinned by good educational leadership Transfer of knowledge from evaluation of projects and initiatives Retention of staff expertise and repurposing of resources.
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENTstrategy, structures, network, tools, support
STAFF DEVELOPMENTskills, understanding, recognition, reward
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENTlearning design, student skills, pedagogic research,
technical implementation
IP
S
A
P – pedagogical innovation
A – academic processes
S – support structures
I – institutional processes
A support service model
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
‘I’ is for integration
“Practices change constantly, but without ‘joined up’ technical and pedagogic support alongside an appropriate reward scheme this
change can be undirected or even misdirected.”
(Oliver & Dempster, 2003)
‘I’ is also for image …
(the importance of branding for CLIPP, schools, individuals)
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Q: What approaches would I take to engage academic staff with TEL?
A: The ones that have the most impact and balance research-intensive needs ...
strategic vs individual practical vs theoretical generic vs disciplinary technology innovation vs tried & tested implementation vs dissemination evaluation vs audit
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
So back to the ‘hooks’
Present TEL as … engaging and inspiring yet practical strategically relevant yet flexible capable of responding efficiently to demand a long term investment that requires monitoring.
Professionalism & interdisciplinaryProfessionalism & interdisciplinary scholarship of teaching/research-led teaching action research & Inquiry-based learning blends research into teaching with curriculum leadership &
student skills development Creating an inspirational learning community!
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Applying this strategy …in a practical sense
TEL development projects
Professional programmes
Teaching excellence awards
Showcase events
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
TEL development projects
Exploratory/innovative Highly practical Engaging Structure & support Team-focused/peer learning Interdisciplinary (to avoid isolated innovations)
Tangible outcomes (usually)
“Funded projects provide a ‘supportive playground’ where innovation can flourish and change in thinking and practice is a natural outcome of approaches that are working.” (Dempster, NIME paper, 2007)
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Professional development programmes Context of professionalism in teaching Competence in the effective application of ICT in
teaching & learning Support & formally recognise TEL developments
Variation in length & format
Provide structure, reflection & sharing
Non-accredited, may involve a development project
Accredited locally and/or nationally
Participants seen as ‘innovators’, ‘champions’, ‘experts’ or ‘agents of change’
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Recognition & excellence awards
Recognising the contribution and commitment of individual staff or course teams
Local university awards for excellence Exceptional impact on the student learning
experience Funding to further disseminate & develop National Teaching Fellowship Scheme Increasingly routes to promotion on the basis
of excellence in teaching (not just research)
Raises the university’s profile of teaching excellence and research-led teaching.
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
E-Learning Showcase Day
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
Conclusions …
Incremental and co-operative activity Promote ICT infrastructure & tools Pedagogic distinctiveness as a driver Academic staff & departments in the driving seat High quality support, flexibility & responsiveness Opportunities for reflection & sharing of practice Critical engagement & excellence leading to
recognition & promotion.
26-Feb-2010 Jay Dempster @ Aston
First goals …
1. Engage in institutional strategies and external networks to inform the institution’s ‘readiness to implement’ TEL methods to extend & enhance provision to cater for different learners’ needs.
2. Identify needs and barriers (hopes and fears) in departments and analyse gaps in staff skills and technical & media support requirements.
3. Work towards establishing a strong tradition of teaching initiatives where dissemination is an active process and the relationship between the Centre and departments that is strong but flexible.
4. Establish ‘academic teams’ through networking in departments and identifying course teams, so staff do not feel isolated and are recognised for & supported in their efforts.
5. Set up a community of practice through sharing opportunities such as publications, showcase events, workshops and programmes particularly towards enhancing links between research, teaching & learning processes with curriculum leadership.
6. Collaborate on rewards and routes to promotion so that teaching excellence achievements are visible and authentic.