Asthma Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? · •287 Bronchial hyper-responsiveness at visit 2, 3, or 4 •9...
Transcript of Asthma Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? · •287 Bronchial hyper-responsiveness at visit 2, 3, or 4 •9...
Asthma—Here Today, Gone Tomorrow?
Jill Grothusen, MD
University of Kansas Family Medicine Residency
June 8th, 2019
1
2
Jill Grothusen, MD
Originally from Scott City, KS in Western KS. Went to undergrad at Mount Holyoke College and studied biochemistry and nutrition. After graduating I worked in biotech consulting and then ran clinical trials in breast cancer and gynecology oncology. I graduated from medical school at the University of Kansas and completed intern year at Valley Family Medical Residency in Renton, WA.
Learning Objectives
Describe the pathophysiology of asthma and clinical manifestations of asthma exacerbations.
Understand how to diagnose/classify asthma using office spirometry.
Apply the step-wise approach to asthma management.
Understand when to appropriately taper down asthma medications.
Social determinants of health of asthma
3
Pathophysiology
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation, airway hyper-responsiveness, airflow limitations, and respiratory symptoms
Airflow obstruction is typically reversible, either resolving spontaneously or with treatment
Precipitating factors vary as well and include: Allergens/Exposure Exercise Change in weather Viral Illness
4
Pathophysiology
5
Pathophysiology
Inflammatory cell infiltration with neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, mast cell activation leading to epithelial cell injury
Persistent changes in airway structure can cause sub basement fibrosis, mucus hypersecretion, injury to epithelial cells/fibrosis, smooth muscle hypertrophy and angiogenesis
6
Pathophysiology
7
8
3M Resource Cards Doctors
Designers 11/96
Clinical Manifestations
Respiratory symptoms including: Wheeze
Shortness of breath
Chest tightness
Cough
May vary over time and in intensity
Exacerbations manifest with progressive worsening of above symptoms, increased work of breathing, tachypnea and tachycardia
9
Diagnosis
10
Respiratory symptoms, HPI/exam consistent
with asthma
Spirometry/PEF consistent with asthma? Treat for Asthma
Repeat spirometry/PEF on another occasion
consistent with asthma?
Consider trial of treatment of other most
likely Dx
yes
No
No
Adapted from Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2018,Box 1-1
Diagnosis with Spirometry
Spirometry more accurate than using peak expiratory flow
FEV1/FVC ratio <70% (below 5th percentile) = obstructive defect present
Determine reversibility after bronchodilator: More than 12% change and 200 mL diagnoses asthma
If spirometry is normal and asthma still suspected, perform methacholine challenge
11
12
Treatment
GINA 2018
When to assess response
Improvement can be seen within the first days of treatment with controller therapy, however full effect may not be seen until 3-4 months, or longer if patient has history of chronic disease with no treatment
Reassess 1-3 months after starting treatment, then every 3-12 months
Schedule follow-up within 1 week of exacerbation
13
Asthma symptom control
14
Asthma symptom control Level of asthma symptom control
In the past 4 weeks, has patient had: Well Controlled Partly Controlled Uncontrolled
Daytime asthma symptoms more than twice/week?
YES NO
“NO” to all 1-2 “YES” 3-4 “YES”Any night waking due to asthma? YES NO
Reliever needed for symptoms more than twice/week*?
YES NO
Any activity limitations due to asthma?
YES NO
GINA 2018
Stepping up
Failure to respond to initial treatment in patients whose symptoms are confirmed to be due to asthma, first: Assess inhaler technique and compliance Modifiable risk factors such as smoking and home
allergens, irritant exposure
Then step up to next therapy level. After 2-3 months review response
If no response of treatment, reduce to previous level, consider alternative treatment options and/or referral
15
Stepping down
Consider stepping down if symptoms have been well controlled for 3 or more months and if low risk for exacerbation
Choose time when patient does not have current infection, no planned travel, if seasonal allergies are factor try to avoid specific times of year
Therapy stepped down and close re-evaluation—document symptom control, lung function and risk factors.
16
Stepping down
17
Current Step
Current Medication/Dose Option for stepping down Evidence
Step 5 High dose ICS/LABA + oral corticosteroids (OCS)
High dose ICS/LABA + other add-on agent
Continue high dose ICS/LABA and reduce OCSUse sputum guided approach to reduce OCSAlternate day OCS treatmentReplace OCS with high dose ICSRefer for consultation
Step 4 Moderate to high dose ICS/LABA maintenance tx
Medium dose ICS/formoterol
High dose ICS + 2nd controller
Continue ICS/LABA with 50% reduction in ICSDiscontinuing LABA may lead to deterioration
Reduce maintenance ICS/formoterol to low dose + continue with PRN relieverReduce ICS by 50% and continue 2nd controller
Step 3 Low dose ICS/LABA
Low dose ICS/formoterol
Moderate- or high-dose ICS
Reduce ICS/LABA to once dailyDiscontinuing LABA may lead to deteriorationReduce maintenance ICS/formoterol to QD dose + continue with PRN relieverReduce ICS dose by 50%
Step 2 Low dose ICS
Low dose ICS or LTRA
Once daily dosing Adding LTRA may allow ICS dose to step down
Consider stopping controller treatment only if no symptoms for 6-12 mo and no major risk factors for severe exacerbation
Asthma remission?
Participants identified as having physician diagnosis of asthma in the previous 5 years, had not smoked cigarettes for at least 10 years, not using long term prednisone, were not pregnant/breastfeeding, no recent MI, stroke or eye surgery
613 participants completed protocol
Tested with spirometry to diagnose asthma. If spirometry normal, then patients underwent MIC testing
18
Asthma remission?
Participants with negative bronchial challenge test results who were using daily asthma-controlling medications were gradually tapered
If no acute worsening of symptoms, no variable decline in peak flow measurements and bronchial challenge tests remained negative, then they eventually had their controller medications discontinued
All patient in whom current asthma excluded had follow up bronchial challenge at 6 and 12 months
19
Asthma remission?
RESULTS 410 patients (67%) were determined to have asthma
based off spirometry or bronchial challenge• 86 reversible airflow obstruction at first visit
• 287 Bronchial hyper-responsiveness at visit 2, 3, or 4
• 9 with acute worsening of asthma when tapering medication
• 28 with asthma diagnosed by study pulmonologist
203 patients (33%) were determined not to have asthma• 43.8% had no prior confirmation by spirometry, bronchial
challenge or PF measurement
20
Discussion
Patients diagnosed with adult-onset asthma may not need to continue treatment indefinitely
Objective testing is essential for proper diagnosis Difficult to determine if cohort of patients in remission
or an incorrect initial diagnosis
Patient population may not be representative to all asthma as patients who were included likely represent more mild disease burden
21
Social Determinants of Health
Prevalence of asthma highest among non-Hispanic blacks, women, persons with less than high school education, and low SES (income <25,000)
Up to 1/3 pts with asthma in Georgia could not see a doctor because of costs
Cost of asthma medications is $$$$ and routine visits can become burdensome
Stresses the importance of Correct diagnosis at onset of symptoms
Use of step-down strategies whenever possible
22
Citations
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Full Report 2007
Global Initiative for Asthma. 2018 GINA Report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention
Aaron SD, et al. Reevaluation of Diagnosis in Adults With Physician-Diagnosed Asthma. JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):269-279. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19627.
Hollingsworth HM, et al. Asthma-Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):262-263. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19676.
Barreiro T, et al. An approach to interpreting spirometry. Am Fam Physician. 2004 Mar 1;69(5):1107-14.
Johnson JD, et al. A stepwise approach to the interpretation of pulmonaryfunction tests. Am Fam Physician. 2014 Mar 1;89(5):359-66.
Ebell M, et al. The burden and social determinants of asthma for adults in the state of Georgia. J Ga Public Health Assoc. 2017 Spring;6(4):426-434. doi: 10.21633/jgpha.6.406.
23
Questions?
24