Associations Between Psychosocial Factors and Intrauterine Growth Retardation
-
Upload
benjamin-buck -
Category
Documents
-
view
73 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Associations Between Psychosocial Factors and Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Associations Between Psychosocial Factors
and Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Sharon Durousseau MD, MPHCalifornia Department of Health Services
Maternal Child Health Branch
Intrauterine Growth Retardation
• Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) – Babies born too small for gestational age
• Over 10,000 full-term infants with IUGR born in California annually
• Increased risk for death and disability• Long-term effects
Incidence Rate of IUGR, CA 1992-1999
0
1
2
3
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Year
per
100
live
birt
hs
Incidence of IUGR by Race/Ethnicity, CA 1999
2
4.1
1.7
2.8
1.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
White/Other AfricanAmerican
AmericanIndian/Alaskan
Native
Asian/PacificIslander
Hispanic
per 1
00 li
ve b
irths
Psychosocial Factors and IUGR?
• Risk factors include– Smoking– Poor nutrition– Prior pregnancy history
• Stress and social factors might affect fetal growth
Study objectives
• Can we identify women at risk by the psychosocial profile?
• Can social support programs affect IUGR rates?
Maternal Infant Health Assessment
• Annual population-based survey • Includes mothers with singleton live
births • Surveys maternal behaviors and
conditions before, during, and after pregnancy
All live births in California Feb. to May 1999
165,898Sampling Design
All live births in California Feb. to May 1999
165,898Sampling Design
Excluded:-Mothers aged <15 yrs-Infants adopted-Mothers deceased-Incomplete contact information
All live births in California Feb. to May 1999
Eligible Population
165,898
156,514
Sampling Design
Excluded:-Mothers aged <15 yrs-Infants adopted-Mothers deceased-Incomplete contact information
All live births in California Feb. to May 1999
Stratified by race/ethnicity,region and education
Eligible Population
165,898
156,514
4,967
Sampling Design
Excluded:-Mothers aged <15 yrs-Infants adopted-Mothers deceased-Incomplete contact information
Random sample strata
All live births in California Feb. to May 1999
Stratified by race/ethnicity,region and education
70.1% response
Eligible Population
165,898
156,514
4,967
3,483
Sampling Design
Excluded:-Mothers aged <15 yrs-Infants adopted-Mothers deceased-Incomplete contact information
Random sample strata
IUGR Case Definition
• A case defined as a mother of a term infant ( >37 weeks gestational age) weighing < 2500 grams at birth
• All other term infants were non-cases
Cases and Non-cases
3,127 mothers ofterm infants
3,483
Cases and Non-cases716 preterm excluded
3,127 mothers ofterm infants
3,483
73 cases 3,054 non-cases
Cases and Non-cases716 preterm excluded
3,127 mothers ofterm infants
3,483
Psychosocial Factors
• Wanting to become pregnant
• Initial happiness about becoming pregnant
• Maternal sense of control score
Statistical Methods• Univariate Analysis with SPSS/SUDAAN
• Logistic regression controlling forRace/ethnicity Maternal agePrior low birthweight Smoking statusEducation Marital statusPoverty
• Data weighted to reflect state population• Tested for interaction
IUGR Risk Factors
Crude OR 95% CI
< 19 years old 2.4 (1.3, 4.5)> 19 years (ref)
African-American 3.1 (1.6 , 6.2)Native American 3.7 (0.5, 29.2)Asian/Pacific Islander 2.9 (1.3, 6.3)Hispanic 1.4 (0.7, 2.6)White/Other (ref)
IUGR Risk FactorsCrude OR 95% CI
< 12 Years education 1.7 (1.01, 2.9)
Unmarried 1.7 (1.05, 2.9)
Medicaid 1.8 (1.04, 2.9)
Income < federal poverty level 2.4 (1.4, 4.1)
IUGR Risk FactorsCrude OR 95% CI
Prior Low Birth Weight Infant 12.7 (5.6,28.8)Underweight prior to pregnancy 2.4 (1.3, 4.2)
Smoked during pregnancy 1.7 (0.9, 3.3)
Alcohol use during pregnancy 0.8 (0.4, 1.6)
No first trimester Prenatal Care 0.9 (0.4, 1.9)
Univariate Analysis: Wanting to Become Pregnant
1.9
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
4
Wanted now or later (ref) Did not want/unsure
Cru
de O
dds
Rat
io
Univariate Analysis: Happiness About Becoming Pregnant
11.3
1.6
3.2
0123456789
Very happy(ref)
Somewhathappy
Somewhatunhappy
Very Unhappy
Crud
e O
dds
Ratio
Univariate Analysis: Maternal Sense of Control Scores
1.91.1
012345678
High (ref) Medium Low
Cru
de O
dds
Rat
io
Multivariate Analysis
OR 95% CI
Did not want/Unsure 2.2 (0.8, 6.7)
Very unhappy 1.5 (0.2, 9.5)
Low control score 1.3 (0.2, 9.2)
Strengths and Weaknesses
• Strengths– Population based sample– Diverse population
• Weaknesses– Retrospective, possible recall bias– Limited detail– Possible low power
Conclusions• Psychosocial factors associated with
IUGR include– Not wanting/being unsure about becoming
pregnant – Being unhappy about becoming pregnant
• After adjusting for other variables, these factors are not statistically significant.
Implications
• Assessing maternal feelings toward pregnancy not sufficient to identify women at risk for having infant with IUGR
• Consider other risk factors• More focused or prospective study
might be needed to explore relationship further
Acknowledgements
• Gilberto Chavez• Don Taylor• Kristen Marchi• Paula Braveman• Rhonda Sarnoff• Andrea Winquist
Pregnancy Wantedness• “ Thinking back to just before you got
pregnant, how did you feel about getting pregnant? ”
• I wanted to get pregnant then.• I wanted to get pregnant later.• I did not want to get pregnant then or
in the future.• I wasn’t sure what I wanted.
Initial Happiness About Becoming Pregnant
• How did you feel when you found out you really were pregnant ?– Very happy– Somewhat happy– Somewhat unhappy– Very unhappy
Maternal Sense of Control• Aggregate score from series of seven
questions• “ How much do you agree with each of
the following statements ? ” – Sample questions:
• “ I have little control over the things that happen to me.”
• “ What happens to me in the future mostly depends on me.”
Power Calculations
• Sample sizes needs to detect 50% difference for each variable ( = 0.05 and = .20)– wantedness 1,088– happiness 4,702– control score 7,738
• Power calculation done in EPI 6.0.