pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2004.06.51

Jan Assmann, The Mind of Egypt. History and Meaning in the Time of thePharaohs. Translated by Andrew Jenkins. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press, 2003. Pp. 513; ills. ISBN 0-674-01211-9. $18.95 (pb).

Reviewed by Sheldon Lee Gosline, Hieratic Font Project, Northeast Normal University,Changchun, China (gosline@hotmail.com)Word count: 1438 words

Originally published in 1996 under the title Ägypten. Eine Sinngeschichte, The Mind of Egypt isboth an intellectual history of ancient Egypt and an exploration in which "the course of events formsthe backdrop and the discourses generating and reflecting meaning occupy the front of the stage."As such, The Mind of Egypt by Jan Assmann, director of the Egyptological Institute of HeidelbergUniversity, sets out upon the impossible task of elucidating how ancient Egyptians collectivelythought over a history that spanned five millennia without a central thesis, as such, but by examininga fascinating array of both well-known and obscure material. The translation from German byAndrew Jenkins is excellent, and, although the book is difficult reading, as was the original, it isdestined to appear in specialized Egyptology course reading lists for years to come, and will appealto the field's academic professionals and dedicated Egyptophiles. A major attraction in anypublication on ancient Egypt is absent: good photographs of the culture's spectacular artistic legacy(there are only thirteen line drawings, four low quality halftones, and one map). There is also no

pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

complete bibliography. Student will be please to find endnotes, an index, a basic chronology, and akey for Egyptian gods.

Assmann's approach reflects more about current scholarly interests in cultural templates andsocietal patterns than about the actual ways in which individual Egyptians reasoned about anyparticular situation. It is more about history and how history is made and interpreted than it is aboutEgypt in particular. Not since J.H. Breasted's Development of Religion and Thought in AncientEgypt (1912) has there been such a systematic attempt to explore the evolution of Egyptian thought,and like Breasted's work was in its time, this recent effort by Assmann is heavily colored bycontemporary theories and the author's unique paradigms.

The rate of change in our own modern world is so profound, especially in countries such asGermany, the United States, or even modern China, that it is tempting to view ancient civilizationsas having been static. This inaccurate perception is especially tempting for a culture such as Egypt,which valued continuity and preserved ways of doing things from generation to generation.Egyptians sanctioned any actual change by stating that continuity was being preserved or an older,and therefore better item or way of doing things was being restored. While Breasted viewed thiscontinuity as a trap that eventually led to entropy and stagnation, Assmann looks back longingly tothe ancient Egyptians sense of continuity and purpose, with the eye of a modern hurried by an everchanging language of the new. His preoccupation with theory may trouble readers accustomed to amore narrative presentation and his concept of "Cosmotheism" and introduction of terminology like"Cosmohermeneutics" complicate things unnecessarily. While Assmann's views concerning thedevelopment of the Egyptian concept of the divine as a unified being with many aspects is wellarticulated in his other works, most clearly in The One And The Many, it is a stretch to ascribe thisworking hypothesis concerning how the Egyptians viewed divinity to being the Egyptian mindset.

Also, Assmann presents the stability of royal kingship as the template for the Egyptian's stablesocial code. In this interpretation, the proverbial tail is wagging the dog. It appears that Assmann isbuying too much into their royal propaganda without being sufficiently critical of his source texts.These inscriptions were inscribed, after all, to convince the average member of society that the

pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pharaoh ruled by divine authority and could not be questioned by mere mortals. This was the statusquo for rulers until Charles I of England was beheaded, on January 30, 1649. From ancient Egypt,we can see preserved evidence at times that the common "man on the street" was fed up with whatan ancient Egyptian ruler was doing, but it is rare. Examples include graffiti at Deir el-Bahri, andDeir el-Medina. In the first site, graffiti depict the ruler in an unflattering manner, and at the later sitethere was even a worker's strike by the artisans entrusted with the job of preparing the pharaoh'sfinal resting place. The end of the world did not happen in either place because the ruler lackedsupport of the ruled. Likewise, Assmann indicated that the Intermediate Periods were gloomy, whilein fact the wealth and status of provincial tombs increased during these times of decentralization.Again, it appears that Assmann has bought into the royal propaganda of pharaohs who couldcommand and build huge monuments that have lasted until now. For all we know, most Egyptiansfound working for a divine ruler like Djoser, Snofru, Cheops, Chephren, Mentuhotep, Thutmosis, orRameses to be much more "gloomy" than working for a local village boss, who might have evenbeen a relative. We should not forget that someone had to build those lovely monuments thatproclaimed how the universe revolved around a particular ruler, and it was certainly not the personfor whom the monument was made who sweated and toiled to make that monument. It was a lot ofother people, who would have probably enjoyed doing something else much more, even if it meantthat Egyptologists now would have a harder time figuring out what that particular ruler had "done".

These observations aside, The Mind of Egypt presents an unprecedented account of Egyptianperspectives, ideals, values, belief systems, praxis, and aspirations. Assmann is perhaps mostconvincing when he explores the meaning of the Egyptian past for the ancients themselves in whathe calls "the hidden face of history". For them, the historic chronicle of pharaohs and dynastiesbegan with the recognition that humans, not gods or demigods, controlled earthly affairs. This recordwas recorded and passed down to a Greek audience by Manetho. Drawing on a range of literary,archaeological, and iconographic sources, Assmann presents plausible decodings for a world ofunparalleled complexity. He would have us believe that Egyptian culture, long before others,possessed an extraordinary degree of awareness and self-reflection. That the ancient Egyptianswere culturally complex cannot be disputed, but the problem is in assuming that other cultures,ancient or modern, are not as complex as Egypt simply because evidence of that complexity has not

pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

been preserved or is not easily understood by the observer. Most strikingly, Assmann focuses onthe meaningful world of ancient Egypt -- multiple notions of time, structures of immortality, andcommitment to social justice and human fellowship. These are all universal issues, found in everyhuman social group. Take for example the discussion of linear and cyclical time. Ancient Egyptianswere certainly not unique in observing a cyclical pattern of the seasons, nor the linear passage ofgenerations. We should not credit them with exceptional powers of reason for such observations,nor with unique abilities to express an understanding of these abstract concepts in concretesymbols. In a way, Assmann acknowledges this by pointing out that without the survival of Egyptianliterary, biographical, and religious inscriptions, "we would not know how this civilization saw itself,how it set itself off from its neighbors, what central values it cherished, what social and religiousnorms it developed..." Many ancient peoples made similar observations and found other ways toexpress those observations. But, in most cases we have no clear records from those other peoples.As with many social aspects, the Egyptians found particularly creative ways to express theseconcepts, which itself is the collective expression of the Egyptian "mind" as opposed to a "mind"trained in some other socio-cultural iconographic paradigm. Moving through successive periods ofEgyptian civilization, from beginnings in the fifth millennium BCE, until the rise of Christianity 4,500years later, Assmann traces the crucial roles of pharaohs, priests, and an imperial bureaucracy. Healso explores the ideal relationship of man to divine forces, thereby explaining monumentalarchitecture and ritual celebrations.

This work is a tantalizing multi-layered study of an ancient civilization, which provides much insightinto what Jan Assmann himself thinks about ancient Egypt, and it may also open new directions forhistorical investigations of the Egyptian psyche itself, but The Mind of Egypt is not the final word onthe subject how, why, or what Egyptians thought, either individually or collectively. This book is theeducated view of just one European Egyptologist concerning the fluid, vast, distinct, and still mostlyunrevealed Egyptian mentality. This reviewer must therefore agree with the Swiss historian JacobBurckhardt a century and a half ago, "Writing a history of the development of the ancient Egyptianmind is an impossibility." The book is yet to be written to tell us how any Egyptian mind reasons:ancient or modern.

pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

ReadLatest

Index for2004

Change GreekDisplay Archives Books Available for

ReviewBMCRHome

HTML generated at 13:29:23, Friday, 03 April 2009