Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

22
Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors with Ultrasound Biomicroscopy versus Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in 200 Cases dr. R.M. Irsan Source: Carlos Bianciotto et al:Ophthalmology 2011;118:1297–1302 Ophthalmology Department Sriwijaya University Faculty of Medicine dr. Muhammad Hoesing Hospital Palembang 2011 Journal reading

description

PPT

Transcript of Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Page 1: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumorswith

Ultrasound Biomicroscopy versus

Anterior Segment Optical CoherenceTomography in 200 Cases

dr. R.M. Irsan

Source:Carlos Bianciotto et al:Ophthalmology 2011;118:1297–1302

Ophthalmology DepartmentSriwijaya University Faculty of Medicine

dr. Muhammad Hoesing Hospital Palembang2011

Journal reading

Page 2: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

AS-OCT OCT imaging anterior segment ocular

structuressuperluminescent light-emitting diode 1310

nanometers wave length 18 microns resolution & 3 to 4 mm penetration

Introduction

Page 3: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

UBMHigh frequency ultrasound 20-50MHzIn 50 MHz mode 25 microns resolution and

5-6mm penetration

Page 4: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Previous study showed UBM and AS-OCT on the fields of glaucoma

Evaluation of anterior segment tumors using UBM and AS-OCT are rare

Page 5: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

To compare UBM and AS-OCT for imaging tumors of the anterior segment of the eye

AIM

Page 6: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

200 patient with anterior segment tumors scanned with both AS-OCT and UBM on the Oncology service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia between June 2008 – March 2010

Methods

Page 7: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

UBM OPKO instrumentation/OTI was set to 50MHz

AS-OCT Visante OCT 3.0

Methods

Page 8: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Demographic data included Age Gender

Tumor features Involved tissue Diagnosis Color Thickness Location shape

Page 9: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

UBM & AS-OCT data Acoustic feature Internal tumor pattern Tumor thickness Tumor base Tumor configuration Tumor margins

Page 10: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Result

200 patients

Age ranging from 2 – 95 yrs

old(mean 50 yrs

old)

74 (37%) Male126 (63%)

female

Page 11: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Eye involvements

Iris stroma 96 eyes (48%)

IPE 44 eyes (22%)

Iris and ciliary body 32 eyes (16%)

Ciliary body 14 eyes (7%)

Conjunctiva 6 eyes (3%)

Sclera 4 eyes (2%)

Ciliary body+choroid 2 eyes (1 %)

iris+ciliary body+choroid 2 eyes (1%)

Page 12: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Opop[

Page 13: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Imaging comparisonVisibility of tumor margins

• Equal on anterior margins ( 90% vs 82%)• Favorable UBM on posterior margin (90%

vs 29%)• All tumor margins were well visualized with

UBM 95%• Tumor shadowing rarely found on UBM

(5%) but more on AS-OCT (72%)

Page 14: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors
Page 15: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors
Page 16: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

In general, UBM was more favorable for resolution of the posterior margin of the lesion and for structures from the pigment epithelium posteriorly, whereas AS-OCT was more favorable for anterior margin and ocular structures anterior to the IPE

Page 17: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors
Page 18: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors
Page 19: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Overall, UBM was more favorable for complete tumor resolution in IPE cyst and iris melanoma, and both UBM and AS-OCT were equivalent for iris nevus

Page 20: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors
Page 21: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors
Page 22: Assessment of Anterior Segment Tumors

Discussion