Assessment Data Keyport Public Schools October 17, 2012

Keyport Administrative Team Lisa M. Savoia Superintendent Melissa Jones Director of Curriculum & Instruction Michael Waters Principal Keyport High School Erik Mammano Vice Principal Keyport High School Anthony Rapolla Principal Central School Kevin Flynn Vice Principal Central School Anthony DePasquale Director of Guidance Denise Cleveland Director of Special Services

Overview of Presentation

NJ ASK/HSPA/AP Growth Model Strategic Planning

NJ ASK/HSPA Goals To measure and promote student achievement

of challenging state curriculum standards ◦ Spring 2013 ~ 50% NJCCS & 50% CCS ◦ Spring 2014 ~100% CCS

To provide accurate and meaningful information about student performance

To meet state and federal accountability

requirements

Language Arts Literacy NJ ASK 3-5 tests include three reading passages at each grade level

that include multiple choice and open ended questions. Students are required to analyze and work with text.

NJ ASK 6-8 tests include four reading passages per grade level. NJ ASK LAL writing tasks require students to respond in a variety

of modes and forms (e.g., expository, persuasive, narrative) and for a variety of purposes. These tasks may be labeled: ◦ Speculative

◦ Explanatory

◦ Expository

◦ Persuasive

HSPA includes 20 multiple choice, 4 open-ended items, and two

writing tasks. Writing is persuasive and expository.

NJ ASK/HSPA Math

Math section includes: Numbers and Numerical Operations Geometry and Measurement Patterns and Algebra Data Analysis, Probability, Statistics ,and

Discrete Mathematics

2012 Total Population Proficiency Rates LA 2012

Grade 3 LA 60% Grade 4 LA 42% Grade 5 LA 45% Grade 6 LA 67%** Grade 7 LA 63%**

**=outperformed the NJ average

PresenterPresentation NotesGrade 4LA42%16 students within two points of proficiency – 70%

Grade 5LA45% 11 students within two points of proficiency – 62%

Current 7th Grade Students Language Arts Growth

2012 Total Population Proficiency Rates Math 2012 Grade 3 Math 79%* Grade 4 Math 74%* Grade 5 Math 82%* Grade 6 Math 73% Grade 7 Math 59%*

* = outperformed the DFG

DFG Math Proficiency Comparisons

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

NJ ASK 3 NJ ASK 4 NJ ASK 5 NJ ASK 6 NJ ASK 7 NJ ASK 8

KeyportDFG

PresenterPresentation NotesTalk to the state means as well

2012 Total Population Proficiency Rates Science Grade 4 Science 93%**

** =outperformed the NJ average

PresenterPresentation NotesPerfect scores?

8th Grade NJASK Grade 8 LA 76% Grade 8 Math 58%

49 % of the 8th grade class improved 15

or more points on the NJASK 7 to the NJASK 8.

2011 NJASK 7 & 2012 NJASK 8 LAL Comparison

2011 NJASK 7 & 2012 NJASK 8 Math Comparison

HSPA 2012 March 2012 P AP Proficient % ◦ LA 38 4 89% ◦ Math 26 6 77%

• Without banking • Keyport High School is currently OUT OF STATUS

Class of 2013 Progress

Alternate Proficiency Assessment LAL PP P AP Grade 3 1 Grade 4 2 Grade 5 1 Grade 6 2 Grade 8 4 1 Grade 11 1 Math PP P AP Grade 3 1 Grade 4 2 Grade 5 1 Grade 6 2 Grade 8 4 1 Grade 11 1

Class of 2012 Post-Secondary Plans

2 Year College 59.4% 4 Year College 23.8% Employed 7.9% Military 7.9% Non U.S. College 1%

Advanced Placement Exams

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

AP Students with Scores 3+

Calculated by comparing a student’s achievement to his/her academic peers in grades 4-8 in Math & LA. ◦ Students with similar NJASK histories ◦ No demographic groups Gender Ethnicity ELL SE ◦ Academic peer commonality Same grade Same test Have achieved similar results for past tests

19

Student Growth Percentiles SGPs

PresenterPresentation NotesThe growth model allows districts and schools to more easily identify promising, or potentially struggling, programs and practices—and therefore to look deeper into what may or may not be working. A growth model can help answer such questions as: How much academic progress did an individual or group of students make in one or more years? How does an individual student’s growth compare to that of students with similar prior test scores? Is a student’s, school’s, or district’s growth higher than, or lower than, or similar to typical growth? Which schools or districts demonstrate better than (or less than) typical growth for their students as compared to schools or districts with similar overall achievement?

Strategic Planning

Curriculum & Instruction ◦ Development and revision of curriculum aligned with new Common Core ◦ Implementation of 3 year curriculum cycle ◦ Instructional Shift to the Common Core ◦ Create, revise and implement benchmark assessments in all core and non

core classes

◦ Use benchmark data to drive instructional planning ◦ Implementation of guided reading and Literacy Centers in grades K-8 ◦ Continue to provide students with access to non-fiction literature ◦ Restructuring of Title I and ESL services ◦ Departmentalization of 4th and 5th grade

Goal 1

In itia te and com ple te a com prehens ive ana lys is o f the D is tric t's K -12 m ath p rogram s.

Goal 2

C reate a new d is tric t eva lua tion system , fo r teachers and adm in is tra tion , to increase s tudent ach ievem ent.

Goal 3

To successfu lly im p lem ent ba lanced lite racy c lassroom s in g rades K th rough G rade 8 focus ing on ta rge ted g rade leve ls based on N JA S K 2011-2012 scores.

25

2012-2013 D is tric t G oa ls

PresenterPresentation NotesStudent Achievement Goal 1 Initiate and complete a comprehensive analysis of the District's K-12 math programs.NJASK 2011-2012 test scores will be utilized during the gap analysis of mathematic instruction that will be aligned to the common core that will take place during the school year. The district will look to create a team to review possible programmatic changes.Goal 2Create a new district evaluation system, for teachers and administration, to increase student achievement.Teachers will receive professional development on the Danielson Framework for Teaching. Administrators will continue to receive professional development as to ensure inter rater reliability is consistent when evaluating teachers and supporting any areas in need of improvement.  Goal 3To successfully implement balanced literacy classrooms in grades K through Grade 8 focusing on targeted grade levels based on NJASK 2011-2012 scores.The action for this goal will be broken down into a k-2, 3-5, and 6-8 clusters. Ongoing professional development and in class teacher support will be implemented into the course of the 2012-2013 school year in order ensure teachers are adequately prepared for the 2013-2014 mandated growth model as it encompasses 50% of teacher and administrator evaluationFacilitiesGoal 4Complete an analysis of district athletic field and create a plan for field improvement. Student Achievement Goal 1 Initiate and complete a comprehensive analysis of the District's K-12 math programs.NJASK 2011-2012 test scores will be utilized during the gap analysis of mathematic instruction that will be aligned to the common core that will take place during the school year. The district will look to create a team to review possible programmatic changes.Goal 2Create a new district evaluation system, for teachers and administration, to increase student achievement.Teachers will receive professional development on the Danielson Framework for Teaching. Administrators will continue to receive professional development as to ensure inter rater reliability is consistent when evaluating teachers and supporting any areas in need of improvement.  Goal 3To successfully implement balanced literacy classrooms in grades K through Grade 8 focusing on targeted grade levels based on NJASK 2011-2012 scores.The action for this goal will be broken down into a k-2, 3-5, and 6-8 clusters. Ongoing professional development and in class teacher support will be implemented into the course of the 2012-2013 school year in order ensure teachers are adequately prepared for the 2013-2014 mandated growth model as it encompasses 50% of teacher and administrator evaluationFacilitiesGoal 4Complete an analysis of district athletic field and create a plan for field improvement. 

Common Core Standards Shifts Impact Assessments

6 Shifts in ELA Literacy Common Core Implementation

Common Core Assessments

1. B a lanc ing In fo rm ationa l and L ite ra ry Text 2 . B u ild ing K now ledge in the D isc ip lines 3 . S ta ircase o f C om plex ity 4 . Text-based A nsw ers 5 . W riting from S ources 6 . A cadem ic Vocabu la ry

1 . Focus 2 . C oherence 3. F luency 4 . D eep U nders tanding 5 . A pp lica tions 6 . D ua l In tens ity

6 Shifts in Mathematics

1 & 2 : N on-fic tion Texts A uthentic Texts

3 : H igher Leve l o f Text C om plex ity P a ired P assages

4& 5: Focus on com m and o f ev idence from tex t: rubrics and prom pts

6 : A cadem ic Vocabu la ry

1 : In tens ive Focus

2: L ink ing B ack

4, 5 , 6 : M athem atica l M ode ling

Strategic Planning

Leadership ◦ Continuous walk-throughs to improve instruction, focused on

Danielson’s Domain 1 Planning and Preparation Danielson’s Domain 2 Classroom Environment Danielson’s Domain 3 Instruction

◦ Implementation of a new observation and evaluation instrument aligned to Danielson’s framework

◦ Implementation of principal evaluation instrument ◦ Administrators certified to observe through Teachscape ◦ 2012-2013 District Goals and Merit Goals are a directly aligned to

student achievement and the improvement of the teaching and learning process.

Strategic Planning Professional Learning ◦ Professional Learning Teams are clearly aligned to teacher PDPs , with

focus on student achievement.

◦ Collaboration with local districts and Monmouth University. ◦ Using Oncourse to keep informed on instructional practices. ◦ Job embedded, sustained professional development.

Thank You

W ork ing Together For E xce llence

Assessment DataOverview of PresentationNJ ASK/HSPA GoalsLanguage Arts LiteracyNJ ASK/HSPA Math2012 Total Population Proficiency Rates LACurrent 7th Grade Students Language Arts Growth2012 Total Population Proficiency Rates MathDFG Math Proficiency Comparisons2012 Total Population Proficiency Rates Science8th Grade NJASK 2011 NJASK 7 & 2012 NJASK 8 LAL Comparison2011 NJASK 7 & 2012 NJASK 8 Math ComparisonHSPA 2012 Class of 2013 ProgressAlternate Proficiency AssessmentClass of 2012 Post-Secondary PlansAdvanced Placement ExamsStudent Growth Percentiles�SGPsSlide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Strategic Planning Slide Number 25Common Core Standards Shifts Impact Assessments�Strategic Planning �Strategic Planning Thank You