Assessment and Accountability Update Tom Jaggard Social Studies Specialist
description
Transcript of Assessment and Accountability Update Tom Jaggard Social Studies Specialist
Assessment and Accountability UpdateTom Jaggard
Social Studies SpecialistRegion Testing Coordinator
Education Service Center, Region 2
Did you know?
How hard is STAAR?
13th Amendment Ended Slavery14th Amendment Rights of Citizens15th Amendment Voting Rights for All Men
Grade 8 Social Studies (US History to 1877)
13th E14th R15th V
Grade 8 Social Studies (US History to 1877)
Grade 8 Social Studies (US History to 1877)
How well did grade 8 students in Texasperform on this question?
Grade 8 Social Studies (US History to 1877)
Region 2 “Triple-Crown Winners”
• CCISD– Baker Middle School– Shaw SES– Windsor Park G/T– Club Estates Elementary School– Faye Webb Elementary School
Region 2 “Triple-Crown Winners”
• Gregory-Portland ISD– Clark Elementary School
• Port Aransas ISD– Olsen Elementary School
• Riviera ISD– Kaufer High School– Nanny Elementary School
Region 2 “Triple-Crown Winners”
• Santa Gertrudis ISD– Santa Gertrudis School
• Skidmore-Tynan ISD– Skidmore-Tynan Elementary School
• St. Mary’s Academy Charter School– St. Mary’s Academy Charter School
Agenda
• Legislative Update– HB5– HB866– Commissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
• Accountability– 2013 Accountability Reports– Index Framework– System Safeguards– Distinction Designations
30
Legislative UpdateHB5
Legislative UpdateHB5
• Assessment• Graduation• Accountability
Legislative UpdateHB5
• Assessment– EOC 15% Rule
• Eliminated completely– EOCs
• Reduced from 15 tests to 5 tests• Eliminated the Cumulative Score*• Eliminated the Minimum Score*
STAAR/EOC
Math ELA Science Social StudiesAlgebra IGeometry Algebra II
English IEnglish IIEnglish III
BiologyChemistryPhysics
World GeographyWorld HistoryU.S. History
HB3 Graduation Requirements
To graduate, a student must achieve a Cumulative Score in each content area that is equal to the product of the number of STAAR/EOC assessments taken in the content area times the Satisfactory Academic Performance scale score.
STAAR/EOC
Math ELA Science Social StudiesAlgebra I English I
English IIBiology
U.S. History
HB5 Graduation Requirements
To graduate, a student must achieve Level II – Satisfactory Academic Performance
on each of these five EOCs.
Legislative UpdateHB5
• Graduation– Replacing MHSP/RHSP/DAP
with Foundation + Endorsements– Applies to entering freshman in 2014-2015
37
Legislative UpdateHB5
• Graduation– Replacing MHSP/RHSP/DAP
with Foundation + Endorsements– Applies to entering freshman in 2014-2015– In 2014-2015, students enrolled in one of the
old plans can choose to switch to the new plan– In 2013-2014, a fourth-year high school
student on track to graduate in May, 2014, can graduate under the Foundation Plan if they fall short of earning RHSP/DAP
Legislative UpdateHB5
• Graduation– Replacing MHSP/RHSP/DAP
with Foundation + Endorsements– SBOE is holding public hearings this fall
to get input regarding the new plans– SBOE will draft rules in November, 2013
to be published for comment– SBOE hopes to finalize these rules
at their meeting in January, 2014
Legislative UpdateHB5
• Accountability (effective in 2016-2017)– District Ratings
• A-B-C-D-F– Campus Ratings
• Exemplary• Recognized• Acceptable• Unacceptable
Legislative UpdateHB5
Table Talk / Reflection TimeQuestions?Concerns?
Next Steps?
Legislative UpdateHB866
Legislative UpdateHB866
• STAAR/3-8– Allows students to skip math and reading in
grades 4, 6, and 7 if they perform well enough (MSASS) on those assessments in grades 3 and 5
MSASS =Minimum Satisfactory Adjusted Scale Score
Legislative UpdateHB866
• STAAR/3-8– Allows students to skip math and reading in
grades 4, 6, and 7 if they perform well enough (MSASS) on those assessments in grades 3 and 5
From HB866 . . . MSASS is a score that, within a three percent margin of error, is predictive that a student achieving that score would achieve satisfactory performance on an assessment instrument in the same subject administered to the student during the following school year.
Legislative UpdateHB866
• STAAR/3-8– Allows students to skip math and reading in
grades 4, 6, and 7 if they perform well enough (MSASS) on those assessments in grades 3 and 5
– Requires a waiver from USDE to implement
Legislative UpdateHB866
• STAAR/3-8– Allows students to skip math and reading in
grades 4, 6, and 7 if they perform well enough (MSASS) on those assessments in grades 3 and 5
– Leaves all other 3-8 tests intact: • Math & Reading in grades 3, 5, & 8• Writing in grades 4 & 7• Science in grades 5 & 8• Social Studies in grade 8
Legislative UpdateHB866
• STAAR/3-8– Allows students to skip math and reading in
grades 4, 6, and 7 if they perform well enough (MSASS) on those assessments in grades 3 and 5
– No change to the 4-hour time limit
Legislative UpdateHB866
Table Talk / Reflection TimeQuestions?Concerns?
Next Steps?
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
“The following policy changes – which will be proposed and adopted under commissioner of education rules – are designed to assist districts in implementing newrequirements under House Bill 5 (HB5), as well as follow established federal requirements, related to the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.”
– TEA Press Release on August 2, 2013
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
• Performance Standards– Phase-in 1 extended for one more year– Students “lock in” a phase-in standard for
all EOCs when they take their first EOC– Timing of Phase-in 2 and Final are TBD
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
• STAAR EOC for English I and English II– Reading and Writing combined in Spring 2014– Transition plan maintains minimum score
and cumulative score for students who have already passed reading or writing but not both
– ELL Special Provision only applies to English I
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
• Middle school students taking Algebra I– Federal accountability requires math and
reading to be tested in grades 3-8 and at least once in high school
– Take Algebra I EOC and grade-level STAAR– Grade-level STAAR for MS accountability– Algebra I follows student for HS accountability
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
• Middle school students taking English I– Federal accountability requires math and
reading to be tested in grades 3-8 and at least once in high school
– Will take English II to satisfy high school accountability so no double-testing needed when they take English I in middle school
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
• STAAR Modified– The U.S. Department of Education has informed
states that assessments based on modified standards for students served by special education cannot be used for accountability purposes after the 2013–2014 school year.
– As a result of that federal directive, all STAAR Modified assessments will be administered for the final time in the 2013–2014 assessment cycle.
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
• STAAR Alternate– HB5 requires TEA to develop an alternate
assessment for the most severely cognitively disabled students – one that does not require teachers to prepare tasks or materials.
– This newly designed alternate assessment will be administered for the first time in the spring of the 2014–2015 school year.
Table Talk / Reflection TimeQuestions?Concerns?
Next Steps?
Legislative UpdateCommissioner’s Proposed Rule Changes
Accountability2013 Accountability Reports
2013 Accountability Reports
• In your report packet you should have:– 2013 Accountability Summary
2013 Accountability Summary
2013 Accountability Reports
• In your report packet you should have:– 2013 Accountability Summary– Calculation Reports for each Index
Calculation Reports for each Index
2013 Accountability Reports
• In your report packet you should have:– 2013 Accountability Summary– Calculation Reports for each Index– Data Tables for each Index
Data Tables for each Index
2013 Accountability Reports
• In your report packet you should have:– 2013 Accountability Summary– Calculation Reports for each Index– Data Tables for each Index– System Safeguards
System Safeguards
2013 Accountability Reports
• In your report packet you should have:– 2013 Accountability Summary– Calculation Reports for each Index– Data Tables for each Index– System Safeguards– Distinction Designations (campus only)
Distinction Designations
2013 Accountability Summary
AccountabilityIndex Framework
Index Framework2009House Bill 3
2010House Bill 3 Transition Plan
2011-2013ATAC and APAC Developed the Framework
April 23, 2013Commissioner’s Final Decisions
August 8, 2013Accountability Ratings were issued
82
83
How is accountability changing?
Indicator System 29 Indicators:
5 Subjects5 Sub-PopsGraduation/Dropout RateCommended PerformanceELL Progress Measure
You were only as good as your weakest indicator.
Index System4 Indexes:
1: Student Achievement2: Student Progress3: Closing Performance Gaps4: Postsecondary Readiness
No single indicator can pull your rating down.
84
85
System SafeguardsDo not affect overall rating
Will have CIP/DIP implicationsWill be incorporated into TAIS
86
Distinction DesignationsOnly apply if overall rating is
Met Standard
87
Required Improvement2015 and Beyond
88
Three-Year-Averagingwill be used if
All Students or EcoDis < 10
89
MSRMinimum Size RequirementAll Students and EcoDis = 10
Other Sub-Pops = 25
90
CTE IndicatorsTBD
2015 and Beyond
91
What are the new ratings?
Per Commissioner Williams’ Senate testimony on April 4, 2013:A-B-C-D-F
A = Achieved target on all 4 indexesB = Achieved target on 3 of 4C = Achieved target on 2 of 4D = Achieved target on 1 of 4F = Failed to achieve any of the 4
92
What are the new ratings?
Per Commissioner Williams’ Final Decisions announced on April 23, 2013:
Met Standard= Met target on all 4 indexes
Met Alternative Standard= Met modified targets for AECs
Improvement Required= Missed target on 1 or more index
93
What are the targets?
Index 1: Student Achievement 50/25
50/25 =50 for non-AEA25 for AEA
NOTE: New AEA Requirement50% enrollment in grades 6-12
95
What are the targets?
Index 1: Student Achievement 50/25Index 2: Student Progress TBD
The Commissioner has indicated that he will set the target for Index 2 somewhere around the 5th percentile.
Index 20%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Top 95%Lowest 5%
97
What are the targets?
Index 1: Student Achievement 50/25Index 2: Student Progress 21/9
July 27 – Appendix J of Accountability Manual:Districts = 21/9High School and Multi-Grade = 17/9Middle School and Junior High = 29/9Elementary = 30/NA
99
What are the targets?
Index 1: Student Achievement 50/25Index 2: Student Progress 21/9Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 55/30Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 75/45
* The Commissioner has indicated that he will set the target for Index 2 somewhere around the 5th percentile.
“It is estimated that the percentage of campuses that will receive the Improvement Required rating will range from seven percent to twelve percent.”
7% = 597 12% = 1,023
103
50/25 21/9 55/30 75/45
Texas77
Reg 270
Texas34
Reg 233
Texas71
Reg 264
Texas85
Reg 283
104
Index 1: Student Achievement“All Students” onlyCombined across all grades and subjectsSTAAR Level II – Satisfactory Academic
Performance at Phase-inPhase-in 1 = 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014Phase-in 2 = 2014-2015? And 2015-2016?Final/Recommended = 2016-2017 and beyond?How are the Phase-ins for 3-8
different from the Phase-ins for EOC?
105
Index 1: Student Achievement“All Students” onlyCombined across all grades and subjectsSTAAR Level II – Satisfactory Academic
Performance at Phase-inIncludes STAAR, STAAR-Spanish, STAAR-
Modified, and STAAR-Alternate (with no caps; see System Safeguards for information on caps)
106
Index 1: Student Achievement“All Students” onlyCombined across all grades and subjectsSTAAR Level II – Satisfactory Academic
Performance at Phase-inSSI – use primary and first retestEOC – use primary and retest from current
accountability year (summer-fall-spring)TAKS – use primary testers only; from spring
administration only
Target: 50/25
R
M
W
S
SS
INDEX SCORE
ALL Students Met Phase-In Level II:
Target: 50/25
Index 1: Student Achievement
Met R + Met M + Met W + Met S + Met SS
All R + All M + All W + All S + All SS
Index 1: Student Achievement
Target: 50/25
Number meeting the phase-in Level II
Standard
Number of Assessments
Index 1: Student Achievement
Target: 50/25
Index 1: Student Achievement
Index 1: Student Achievement
Index 1: Student Achievement
Look at the Index 1 results for:Your ISD and/or Campus
Question?Concerns?Next Steps?
Index 1: Student Achievement
114
Index 2: Student Progress10 Student Groups:
“All Students”7 Race/Ethnicity Groups Can you name them?African-American, Hispanic, WhiteAmerican Indian, Asian, Pacific IslanderTwo or More Races
115
Index 2: Student Progress10 Student Groups:
“All Students”7 Race/Ethnicity GroupsSPEDELLNOTE: This is the only index that evaluates assessment results for SPED and ELL as separate groups.
116
Index 2: Student Progress10 Student Groups:
“All Students”7 Race/Ethnicity GroupsSPEDELLNOTE: SPED and ELL are also evaluatedseparately in Index 4 as part of theGraduation Rate calculation.
117
Index 2: Student Progress10 Student Groups:
“All Students”7 Race/Ethnicity GroupsSPEDELL
Reading, Math, and Writing1 point for “Met Growth Expectation”2 points for “Exceeded Growth Expectation”
Target: 21/9
118
Index 2: Student ProgressUses a “Gain Score” approachSubtract Prior Year Score from Current Year Score
to find Gain ScoreCompare Gain Score to Progress ExpectationClassify as:
Did Not Meet Growth Expectation (0 points)Met Growth Expectation (1 point)Exceeded Growth Expectation (2 points)
Target: 21/9
Index 2: Student ProgressAll
African American
American Indian
Asian
Hispanic
Pacific Islander
Whit
Two or More
≥ 10 students
≥ 25 students
ELLSPED
MSR is applied to each subject:
ReadingMathWriting
Index 2: Student Progress
•One point per % Met
•Two points per %Exceeded
Target: 21/9
Total Points Earned (Reading, Math, Writing)
Maximum Points (Reading, Math, Writing)
Index 2: Student Progress
Target: 21/9
Index 2: Student Progress
Index 2: Student Progress
Index 2: Student Progress
Look at the Index 2 results for:Your ISD and/or Campus
Question?Concerns?Next Steps?
129
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps3 Student Groups:
EcoDisNOTE: This is the only index that looks at
EcoDis as a separate group.
130
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps3 Student Groups:
EcoDis2 lowest-performing Race/Ethnicity
groups from prior year Index 1 What are the 7 Race/Ethnicity groups?African-American, Hispanic, WhiteAmerican Indian, Asian, Pacific IslanderTwo or More Races
131
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps3 Student Groups:
EcoDis2 lowest-performing Race/Ethnicity
groups from prior year Index 1What happens if you have a
homogenous student population?
132
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps3 Student Groups:
EcoDis2 lowest-performing Race/Ethnicity
groups from prior year Index 1What is the MSR for these groups?EcoDis = *10Race/Ethnicity = 25MSR is applied to each subject.
133
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps3 Student Groups:
EcoDis2 lowest-performing Race/Ethnicity
groups from prior year Index 1By Subject Area (all subjects)1 point for Level II – Satisfactory at Phase-in*2 points for Level III – Advanced(*Will not be used until 2013-2014)
Target: 55/30
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
Weighted Performance Rate
Lowest Performing Ethnicity #2
Lowest Performing Ethnicity #1
EcoDis
Prior YearIndex 1
Target: 55/30
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
READING
Lowest Ethnicity #2
Lowest Ethnicity #1
EcoDis
MATHEMATICS
Lowest Ethnicity #2
Lowest Ethnicity #1
EcoDis
WRITING
Lowest Ethnicity #2
Lowest Ethnicity #1
EcoDis
SCIENCE
Lowest Ethnicity #2
Lowest Ethnicity #1
EcoDis
SOCIAL STUDIES
Lowest Ethnicity #2
Lowest Ethnicity #1
EcoDis
Target: 55/30
MSR is applied to each subject.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
Look at the Index 3 results for:Your ISD and/or Campus
Question?Concerns?Next Steps?
139
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness8 Student Groups:
“All Students” Group7 Race/Ethnicity Groups
Combined across all grades and subjects*STAAR Level II – Satisfactory at Final(*Will not be used until 2013-2014)Graduation Rate (4-year and 5-year)Diploma Rate (RHSP/AHSP) NOTE: AHSP = DAP
STAARScore
140
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness8 Student Groups:
“All Students” Group7 Race/Ethnicity Groups
Combined across all grades and subjects*STAAR Level II – Satisfactory at Final(*Will not be used until 2013-2014)Graduation Rate (4-year and 5-year)Diploma Rate (RHSP/AHSP)
Target: 75/45
STAARScore
GraduationScore
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score
Graduation Score
Target: 75/45
*Number of Students Met FINAL Level II
Standard on One or More Tests
*Number of Students with One or More Tests
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score
(*Will not be used until 2013-2014)
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
•Percentage of all 4-year graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
4-year graduation rate
•Percentage of all 5-year graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
5-year graduation rate
•RHSP/AHSP Graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
RHSP/AHSP
Target: 75/45
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
•Percentage of all 4-year graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
4-year graduation rate
•Percentage of all 5-year graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
5-year graduation rate
•RHSP/AHSP Graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
RHSP/AHSP
Target: 75/45
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
•Percentage of all 4-year graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
4-year graduation rate
•Percentage of all 5-year graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
5-year graduation rate
•RHSP/AHSP Graduates
•ALL Students and subgroups of minimum size
RHSP/AHSP
Graduation Score
Target: 75/45
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Graduation Score + *STAAR Score
2(*Will not be used until 2013-2014)
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Look at the Index 4 results for:Your ISD and/or Campus
Question?Concerns?Next Steps?
Index 1:Student
Achievement50/25
State = 77Region 2 = 70
Index 2:Student Progress
21/9State = 34
Region 2 = 33
Index 3:Closing Performance Gaps
55/30State = 71
Region 2 = 64
Index 4:Postsecondary Readiness
75/45State = 85
Region 2 = 83State
AccountabilityRating
Per Commissioner’s Final Decisions published 4-23-2013
AccountabilitySystem Safeguards
System Safeguards
Texas Education Agency submitted a waiver request to the United States Department of Education (USDE) on February 28, 2013.
The waiver included a request to use the new state accountability system (Performance Indexes and System Safeguards) to evaluate campuses and districts in place of federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) evaluations.
The proposed 2013 Texas Accountability Workbook was submitted with the waiver request (Attachment 8) and may be accessed at: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=25769803880.
153
Subject: Implementation of Title I School ImprovementProgram (SIP) interventions for the 2013-2014 school year
• The Texas Education Agency (Agency) continues conversations with the United States Department of Education (USDE) requesting to waive specific provisions of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by P.L. 107-110 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001.
• Due to the ongoing negotiations, local educational agencies (LEAs) will not be required to implement current Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)-related School Improvement Program (SIP) requirements prior to the start of school year 2013-2014. This delay in implementation is a temporary suspension pending the outcome of the continuing waiver negotiations. Determinations of which federal School Improvement Program requirements will be implemented for the 2013-2014 school year will be communicated upon notice.
Indicator All African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander White Two or More
Eco.Disadv. ELL Special
Ed.
Performance Rates
Reading 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Mathematics 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Writing 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Science 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Social Studies 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Participation Rates
Reading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)
4-year 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78%
5-year 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%
District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results
Reading
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Mathematics
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets
Why 50%?Matches Index 1
Indicator All African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander White Two or More
Eco.Disadv. ELL Special
Ed.
Performance Rates
Reading 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Mathematics 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Writing 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Science 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Social Studies 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Participation Rates
Reading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)
4-year 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78%
5-year 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%
District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results
Reading
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Mathematics
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets
What is the target if our NCLB waiver request is denied?
Reading/ELA = 93%Math = 92%
Indicator All African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander White Two or More
Eco.Disadv. ELL Special
Ed.
Performance Rates
Reading 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Mathematics 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Writing 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Science 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Social Studies 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Participation Rates
Reading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)
4-year 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78%
5-year 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%
District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results
Reading
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Mathematics
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets
Why 95%?Matches AYP
Indicator All African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander White Two or More
Eco.Disadv. ELL Special
Ed.
Performance Rates
Reading 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Mathematics 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Writing 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Science 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Social Studies 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Participation Rates
Reading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)
4-year 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78%
5-year 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%
District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results
Reading
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Mathematics
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets
Why 78% and 83%?Matches AYP
Indicator All African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander White Two or More
Eco.Disadv. ELL Special
Ed.
Performance Rates
Reading 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Mathematics 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Writing 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Science 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Social Studies 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Participation Rates
Reading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)
4-year 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78%
5-year 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%
District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results
Reading
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Mathematics
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets
Why 1% and 2%?Matches AYPNote 1: All Students OnlyNote 2: District-level Only
Indicator All African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander White Two or More
Eco.Disadv. ELL Special
Ed.
Performance Rates
Reading 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Mathematics 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Writing 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Science 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Social Studies 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Participation Rates
Reading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)
4-year 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78%
5-year 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%
District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results
Reading
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Mathematics
Modified 2% Not Applicable
Alternate 1% Not Applicable
Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets
What happensif you miss one?
“Failure to meet the safeguard target for any reported cell must be addressed in the campus or
district improvement plan.”
“If the campus or district is already identified for assistance or intervention in the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)
based on the current year state accountability rating or prior year state or federal
accountability designations, performance on the safeguard indicators will be incorporated
into that improvement effort.”
Met Standard/Met Alternative
Standard
AccountabilitySystem Safeguards
Look at the System Safeguards for:Your ISD and/or Campus
Question?Concerns?Next Steps?
AccountabilityDistinction Designations
167
Distinction Designations
For 2013 and BeyondTop 25% Student Progress (Index 2)Academic Achievement Distinction Designations
Reading/ELAMath
For 2014 and BeyondTop 25% Closing Achievement Gaps (Index 3)
Identify the Campus Comparison Group– 40 campuses per group– Campus Type (EL, MS, HS, K12)
Distinction Designations
Identify the Campus Comparison Group– 40 campuses per group– Campus Type (EL, MS, HS, K12)– Campus Size (Total Enrollment)– EcoDis %– ELL %– Student Mobility %
Distinction Designations
172
Campuses in the top 25% (top quartile) of their campus comparison group on Index 2: Student Progress score are eligible for a distinction designation for student progress.
Campuses onlyEligibility criteria – Met Standard ratingCampuses in the top 25% (top quartile) in student progressCampus comparison groups from Academic Achievement Distinction DesignationsCampuses evaluated under alternative education procedures are not eligible for distinction designations, per TEC §39.201.
Top 25% Student Progress Distinction
174
Academic Achievement Distinction Designations
175
Academic Achievement Distinction Designations
AccountabilityDistinction Designations
Look at the Distinction Designations for:Your Campus
Question?Concerns?Next Steps?