Assessing Early Brain Development in Neonates by Segmentation of High-Resolution 3T MRI

1
Assessing Early Brain Development in Neonates by Segmentation of High- Resolution 3T MRI 1,2 G Gerig, 2 M Prastawa, 3 W Lin, 1 John Gilmore Departments of 1 Psychiatry, 2 Computer Science, 3 Radiology University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,NC 27614, USA [email protected] / http://www.cs.unc.edu/~gerig SUMMARY METHODS • It is feasible to study brain development in unsedated newborns using 3T MRI • Study will likely provide a vastly improved understanding of early brain development and its relationship to neuropsychiatric disorders. • Novelty: Tissue model for segmentation of myelinated/nonmyel. white matter. CONCLUSIONS RESULTS T1-only segmentation Building of Atlas Template MICCAI Nov. 2003 Research: Quantitative MRI to study unsedated newborns at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical Study: 120 newborns recruited at UNC, age at MRI about 2 weeks Motivation: Early detection of abnormalities Possibility for early intervention and therapy. Imaging: High field (3T Siemens Allegra), high resolution (T1 1mm 3 , FSE 0.9x0.9x3mm 3 ), high-speed imaging (12’ for T1, FSE and DTI). • So far: 20 normal neonates (10 males, 10 females) • Age 16 ± 4 days • Siemens 3T head-only scanner • Neonates were fed prior to scanning, swaddled, fitted with ear protection and had their heads fixed in a vac- fix device • A pulse oximeter was monitored by a physician or research nurse • Most neonates slept during the scan • Motion-free scans in 13-15 infants 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 volum e (m l) n0001 n0002 n10 n18 n23 n25 n26 n31 n32 n33 n40 cases B rain Tissue V olum e N eonates wm -m yel csf gm wm -nonm yel T1 3D MPRage 1x1x1 mm3 FSE T2w 1x1x3 mm3 FSE PDw 1x1x3 mm3 Here Text Here Text Template MRI white matter csf gray matter Tissue Probability Maps whi te gray csf myelin. early myelinated corticospinal tract hyper- intense motor cortex Neonate Adult Approach: •Atlas-moderated EM segmentation (cf. Leemput and Warfield) •Tissue intensity model for white matter (non-myelinated and myelinated wm form bimodal distribution) (cf. Cocosco, Prastawa) Challenge: Very low CNR, heterogeneous tissue, early myelination regions, reverse contrast wm/gm. •Standard brain tissue segmentation fails. Preliminary Results UNC Neonate Study gm wm wm myl Int # PD/T2 segmentation High-resolution PD/T2 data courtesy of Petra Hueppi, Univ. of Geneva. Supported by NIH Conte Center MH064065, Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center HD 03110 and the Theodore and Vada Stanley Foundation Literature Gilmore JH, Gerig G, Specter B, Charles HC, Wilber JS, Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA (2001a): Neonatal cerebral ventricle volume: a comparison of 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med and Biol 27:1143-1146. Huppi PS, Warfield S, Kikinis R, Barnes PD, Zientara GP, Jolesz FA, Tsuji MK, Volpe JJ (1998b): Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain development in premature and normal newborns. Ann Neurol 43: 224-235. Zhai G, Lin W, Wilber K, Gerig G, Gilmore JH (2003): Comparisons of regional white matter fractional anisotrophy in healthy neonates and adults using a 3T head-only scanner. Radiology (in press). Warfield, S., Kaus, M., Jolesz, F., Kikinis, R.: Adaptive template moderated spa-tially varying statistical classification. In Wells, W.M.e.a., ed.: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’98). Volume 1496 of LNCS., Springer 1998 Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P.: Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18 (1999) 897–908 Cocosco, C.A., Zijdenbos, A.P., Evans, A.C.: Automatic generation of training data for brain tissue classification from mri. In Dohi, T., Kikinis, R., eds.: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2002. Volume 2488 of LNCS., Springer Verlag (2002) 516–523 Prastawa, M., Bullitt, E., Gerig, G., Robust Estimation for Brain Tumor Segmentation, MICCIA 2003, Nov. 2003

description

#. wm. gm. wm myl. Int. white. gray. csf. myelin. Template MRI. white matter. gray matter. csf. Here Text Here Text. Tissue Probability Maps. Assessing Early Brain Development in Neonates by Segmentation of High-Resolution 3T MRI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Assessing Early Brain Development in Neonates by Segmentation of High-Resolution 3T MRI

Page 1: Assessing Early Brain Development in Neonates by Segmentation of High-Resolution 3T MRI

Assessing Early Brain Development in Neonates by Segmentation of High-Resolution 3T MRI

1,2G Gerig, 2M Prastawa, 3W Lin, 1John Gilmore Departments of 1Psychiatry, 2Computer Science, 3Radiology

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,NC 27614, [email protected] / http://www.cs.unc.edu/~gerig

SUMMARY

METHODS

• It is feasible to study brain development in unsedated newborns using 3T MRI

• Study will likely provide a vastly improved understanding of early brain development and its relationship to neuropsychiatric disorders.

• Novelty: Tissue model for segmentation of myelinated/nonmyel. white matter.

CONCLUSIONS

RESULTS

T1-only segmentation

Building of Atlas Template

MICCAI Nov. 2003

• Research: Quantitative MRI to study unsedated newborns at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.

• Clinical Study: 120 newborns recruited at UNC, age at MRI about 2 weeks

• Motivation: Early detection of abnormalities Possibility for early intervention and therapy.

• Imaging: High field (3T Siemens Allegra), high resolution (T1 1mm3, FSE 0.9x0.9x3mm3), high-speed imaging (12’ for T1, FSE and DTI).

• So far: 20 normal neonates (10 males, 10 females)

• Age 16 ± 4 days• Siemens 3T head-only scanner• Neonates were fed prior to scanning,

swaddled, fitted with ear protection and had their heads fixed in a vac-fix device

• A pulse oximeter was monitored by a physician or research nurse

• Most neonates slept during the scan• Motion-free scans in 13-15 infants

0.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

vo

lum

e (

ml)

n0

00

1

n0

00

2

n1

0

n1

8

n2

3

n2

5

n2

6

n3

1

n3

2

n3

3

n4

0

cases

Brain Tissue Volume Neonates

wm-myel

csf

gm

wm-nonmyel

T1 3D MPRage1x1x1 mm3

FSE T2w1x1x3 mm3

FSE PDw1x1x3 mm3

Here TextHere Text

Template MRI white matter csfgray matter

Tissue Probability Maps

white

gray

csf

myelin.

earlymyelinatedcorticospinaltract

hyper-intensemotor cortex

NeonateAdult

Approach:

• Atlas-moderated EM segmentation (cf. Leemput and Warfield)

• Tissue intensity model for white matter (non-myelinated and myelinated wm form bimodal distribution) (cf. Cocosco, Prastawa)

• Challenge: Very low CNR, heterogeneous tissue, early myelination regions, reverse contrast wm/gm.

• Standard brain tissue segmentation fails.

Preliminary Results UNC Neonate Study

gmwm

wm myl

Int

#

PD/T2 segmentation

High-resolution PD/T2 data courtesy of Petra Hueppi, Univ. of Geneva.

Supported by NIH Conte Center MH064065, Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center HD 03110 and the Theodore and Vada Stanley Foundation

Literature

• Gilmore JH, Gerig G, Specter B, Charles HC, Wilber JS, Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA (2001a): Neonatal cerebral ventricle volume: a comparison of 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med and Biol 27:1143-1146.

• Huppi PS, Warfield S, Kikinis R, Barnes PD, Zientara GP, Jolesz FA, Tsuji MK, Volpe JJ (1998b): Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain development in premature and normal newborns. Ann Neurol 43: 224-235.

• Zhai G, Lin W, Wilber K, Gerig G, Gilmore JH (2003): Comparisons of regional white matter fractional anisotrophy in healthy neonates and adults using a 3T head-only scanner. Radiology (in press).

• Warfield, S., Kaus, M., Jolesz, F., Kikinis, R.: Adaptive template moderated spa-tially varying statistical classification. In Wells, W.M.e.a., ed.: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’98). Volume 1496 of LNCS., Springer 1998

• Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P.: Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18 (1999) 897–908

• Cocosco, C.A., Zijdenbos, A.P., Evans, A.C.: Automatic generation of training data for brain tissue classification from mri. In Dohi, T., Kikinis, R., eds.: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2002. Volume 2488 of LNCS., Springer Verlag (2002) 516–523

• Prastawa, M., Bullitt, E., Gerig, G., Robust Estimation for Brain Tumor Segmentation, MICCIA 2003, Nov. 2003