Assessing Decision Making Capacity in Adult Protective Services Clients Jason Schillerstrom, MD...

59
Assessing Decision Making Capacity in Adult Protective Services Clients Jason Schillerstrom, MD [email protected]

Transcript of Assessing Decision Making Capacity in Adult Protective Services Clients Jason Schillerstrom, MD...

  • Slide 1
  • Assessing Decision Making Capacity in Adult Protective Services Clients Jason Schillerstrom, MD [email protected]
  • Slide 2
  • Learning Objectives Describe the process of decisional capacity assessments. Understand the reluctance of some primary care physicians to evaluate capacity. Describe the relationship between executive function and self-care abilities.
  • Slide 3
  • Scope of the problem and risk assessment
  • Slide 4
  • Scope of the problem How many elders >65yrs in Texas? How many 18-64yrs with disability in Texas? How many completed in-home investigations in FY 2013? How many validated in-home investigations? How many guardianships are there in Texas?
  • Slide 5
  • Scope of the problem How many elders >65yrs in Texas? 2,954,972 How many 18-64yrs with disability in Texas? 1,710,430 (elders + disabled = 4,665,402) How many completed in-home investigations in FY 2013? 69,383(=1.5% of elders + disabled) How many validated in-home investigations? 48,392 How many guardianships are there in Texas? 52,000 ( = 1.1% of elders + disabled)
  • Slide 6
  • Questions to Answer for APS Does the APS client have a psychiatric diagnosis? Does the client have decision making capacity? What level of care do they need? Do they need to be emergently removed from their home?
  • Slide 7
  • Texas Legal Definition of Incapacity in Guardianship An incapacitated person is an adult who, because of a physical or mental condition, is substantially unable to provide food, clothing, or shelter for himself or herself, to care for the individuals own physical health, or to manage the individuals own financial affairs.
  • Slide 8
  • Texas Legal Definition of Incapacity in Guardianship An incapacitated person is an adult who, because of a physical or mental condition, is substantially unable to provide food, clothing, or shelter for himself or herself, to care for the individuals own physical health, or to manage the individuals own financial affairs.
  • Slide 9
  • Ethical, Legal, or Clinical Issues to Consider First Should the client be notified that I am coming? Should the client be informed about the purpose of my evaluation? How much information should I get from APS? Are they biasing my assessment? Should the capacity assessment be completed by a physician unknown to the client (me) or the clients physician?
  • Slide 10
  • Decisional Capacity and the Primary Care Physician Is the PCP the best person to do the evaluation? Should the PCP have to do the capacity evaluation? What are reasons the PCP may not want to do the evaluation?
  • Slide 11
  • PCPs and Capacity Determinations No compensation Risk of subpoena Little training in capacity assessments and not a routine assignment These assessments are very different from the medical model Potential fracturing of the doctor-patient relationship
  • Slide 12
  • Scientific Dilemmas? How reliable is IADL self report? Proxy report? What is the best way to measure functional status in these cases? What cognition(s) are essential to functional and decisional capacity?
  • Slide 13
  • Which Cognitive Functions are most Essential to Decisional Capacity? Memory Orientation Language Math Visuospatial Executive Function
  • Slide 14
  • That set of cognitive processes that allow one to act independent of the environment instead of displaying behaviors mediated by the environment. When executive processes deteriorate, people become dependent on habits and routine.
  • Slide 15
  • Executive Screens Verbal Fluency Task FAS - >10 words in 1 minute Verbal Trailmaking Task Past 5E
  • Slide 16
  • Stroop Color Delis-Kaplin Executive Function System (D-KEFS). Pearson Education, Inc.; San Antonio, TX. (2001)
  • Slide 17
  • Stroop Number Delis-Kaplin Executive Function System (D-KEFS). Pearson Education, Inc.; San Antonio, TX. (2001)
  • Slide 18
  • Stroop Interference Delis-Kaplin Executive Function System (D-KEFS). Pearson Education, Inc.; San Antonio, TX. (2001)
  • Slide 19
  • The Executive Interview 25 item multitask assessment 0 = correct response 1 = partial error 2 = complete error Scoring Range Approximations: Young adults: 0-7 Elderly retirees: 8-14 Assisted Living: 15-22 Nursing Home: 23-30 Locked Units: >30
  • Slide 20
  • Clock Drawing Tasks
  • Slide 21
  • CLOX: An Executive Clock Drawing Task back
  • Slide 22
  • Instructions: CLOX1 1) Place the blank (back) side of the CLOX form in front of the subject. 2) State Draw me a clock that says 1:45. Set the hands and numbers on the face so that a child could read them. 3) Once the subject begins the task, no further assistance is allowed (i.e. no prompting or repeat instructions). State Sir/Maam, its up to you for each question.
  • Slide 23
  • Circular face present? Age: 64 years GDS: 5/15 MIS: 8 MMSE: 28 CLOX1: 5 CLOX2: 11
  • Slide 24
  • Only numerals 1-12 among the numerals present? Age: 83 years GDS: 2/15 MIS: 6 MMSE: 18 CLOX1: 7 CLOX2: 7 EXIT25: 36
  • Slide 25
  • Arrow pointing inward Age: 85 years GDS: 1/15 MIS: 2 MMSE: 15 CLOX1: 7 CLOX2: 12 EXIT25: 36
  • Slide 26
  • Intrusion from face Intrusion from circle below Age: 60 years GDS: 1/15 MIS: 8 MMSE: 30 CLOX1: 6 CLOX2: 13 EXIT25: 26
  • Slide 27
  • Who has capacity?
  • Slide 28
  • 7 years, 4 months MMSE: 25/30 CLOX1: 6/15 CLOX2: 11/15 Verbal fluency (S): 2 words EXIT25: 14/50
  • Slide 29
  • 10 years, 5 months MMSE: 27/30 CLOX1: 12/15 CLOX2: 13/15 Verbal fluency (S): 14 words EXIT25: 8/50
  • Slide 30
  • Executive Function Determines Level of Care % Variance in Level of Care Among N=148 CCRC Residents (Total Model R 2 = 0.57)
  • Slide 31
  • Executive Function predicts decisional abilities. Schillerstrom JE, et al. Executive function and capacity to consent to a noninvasive research protocol. Am J Geriatri Psychiatry 2007; 15:159-162
  • Slide 32
  • Key Points Guardianships are common and rare. Executive function is the cognitive domain that best predicts self care abilities. Executive function predicts a persons ability to understand, appreciate, and use reasoning to make personal decisions.
  • Slide 33
  • Case Example - 1 88yr HF referred for neglect recidivistic case. Lives by self in San Antonio. House is in severe disrepair, squalorous, animal feces throughout, human waste in toilet and bathtub, severe insect infestation, dead dog recently discovered. PCP knows patient and believes she may have capacity (She misses appts but takes her meds. She has bad hygiene but she has capacity.). Family seems to either underestimate health/safety hazards or overestimate her abilities. They brought her a broom 4 days ago. Utilities are frequently disconnected. APS and family have had them paid and reconnected on multiple occasions.
  • Slide 34
  • Case Example - 1 Past Psychiatry History: previously diagnosed with dementia. Past Medical History: unknown Medications: unknown
  • Slide 35
  • Case Example - 1 Social History: Raised in San Antonio 4yr Sociology degree Divorced >10 years No biological children has step-children Denies tobacco and alcohol Retired receptionist; earns $550/month Receives meals-on-wheels.
  • Slide 36
  • Case Example - 1
  • Slide 37
  • Case Example - 2
  • Slide 38
  • Risk Factors What are this clients modifiable risk factors for future neglect? What are this clients non-modifiable risk factors for future neglect? What options does the APS Specialist have?
  • Slide 39
  • UTHSCSA Geri Psych Battery TestCognitive Domain RangeCut-point MISMemory0-8