Asiacup2013 Problem Eng

download Asiacup2013 Problem Eng

of 4

Transcript of Asiacup2013 Problem Eng

  • 7/25/2019 Asiacup2013 Problem Eng

    1/4

    INTERNATIONAL LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

    ASIA CUP 2013

    ASTRAL v.RESMIN

    A CASE CONCERNING THE DEATH OF BEN OSTONOV

    Country ASTRAL and RESMIN are neighboring States sharing common borders.

    In RESMIN, General KUROL, the powerful leader of RESMINs army, seized power in a coup

    detatin 1990 and then assumed the presidency in RESMIN. By shutting down the parliament,

    he wielded dictatorial power and oppressed his political oppositions. However, in consequence

    of the movement for democratization in RESMIN in December 2012, called the RESMIN

    Spring, President KUROL was displaced from power in the overthrow of his regime. He died

    as a result of an airplane accident when he tried to escape to another country by military

    aircraft.

    In March 2009, apresidential election and aparliamentary election were carried out in

    RESMIN. In conducting these elections, election monitors set up by the resolution of United

    Nations Security Council were dispatched to RESMIN, and they confirmed that the elections

    were peacefully conducted under democratic procedures. As a result of the elections, RESMIN

    Peoples Party(RPP) won the presidential election as well as the parliamentary election. The

    manifest of the RPP was realizing national reconciliation, which aimed to lead to the end of

    severe political conflict between the former administration and rebel group. Started in April

    2009, the RPP government proposed enactment of National Reconciliation Act (NRA). NRA

    was aimed to implement the RPPs manifest of realizing national reconciliationand provided

    that the conducts enumerated in the Act during KUROL administration (1990-2008) did not

    lead to responsibility under criminal law nor civil law, as long as they were conducted under

    political intentions. These conducts are: repression and torture by then governmental officials

    against rebel groups and attacks bythese rebel groups to the government. The bill of NRA was

    adapted at the parliament of RESMIN in August 2009 and came into force at the same time.

    Under the KUROL regime during 1990-2008, governmental officials (mainly military and

    police) oppressed rebel groups in organized manner, like extrajudicial detention, torture and

    killing. On the other hand, rebel groups also committed indiscriminate attacks against

  • 7/25/2019 Asiacup2013 Problem Eng

    2/4

    governmental officials and civilians on many occasions, which resulted in considerable amount

    of loss of life in RESMIN including government officials, rebel groups and ordinary citizens.

    Mr. BEN OSTONOV, a national of ASTRAL and a freelance journalist based in ASTRAL, had

    engaged in reporting the situation of human rights oppression under the KUROL regime. In

    September 2005, He was abducted by unidentified men immediately after his arrival to an

    airport in RESMIN where he would try to gather information and was found dead near the

    airport in October 2005. His body was livid with numerous bruises and had many scars, which

    indicated that he had suffered the torture.

    Some journalists, who were friends of Mr. OSTONOV and based in ASTRAL, made it clear

    that in August 2005, just before Mr. OSTONOVs departure from ASTRAL for RESMIN, he

    received a letter from the RESMIN embassy in ASTRAL. According to them, the letter

    advisedhim to cancel the travel to RESMIN and the news gathering activities in RESMIN

    because the activities of terrorist groups increased in the territory of RESMIN and the

    Government of RESMIN could not guarantee the security of Mr. OSTONOV in case of his

    entry into RESMIN.

    SABENA OSTONOV, wife of Mr. OSTONOV, insisted that the Government of RESMIN was

    responsible for the death of Mr. OSTONOV. In November 2005, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    of ASTRAL also asked the Government of RESMIN to explain and provide with information

    on the death of Mr. OSTONOV. Though the Government of RESMIN promised that it would

    try to make investigation into the incident, neither detailed information nor official explanation

    was given to ASTRAL.

    In January 2010, GLOBAL RESMIN, a prestige newspaper in RESMIN, published an article,

    which stated that the death of Mr. OSTONOV was of abduction, torture and killing by the

    secret police of RESMIN under the instruction of then top senior official of the KUROL regime.

    According to GLOBAL RESMIN, this article was based on verbal evidence obtained from

    some former members of the secret police during the KUROL regime and proved enough.

    However, the sources of information were not released by GLOBAL RESMIN.

    In February 2010, in reaction to the above article of GLOBAL RESMIN, the Ministry of

    Foreign Affairs of ASTRAL once again requested the Government of RESMIN to provide with

    information on the death of Mr. OSTONOV and investigate into it. The Government of

    RESMIN replied that it had no specific information on this matter.

  • 7/25/2019 Asiacup2013 Problem Eng

    3/4

    SABENA OSTONOV, Mr. OSTONOVs widow, brought a civil charge against the

    Government of RESMIN before a local Court in ASTRAL (Court of first instance) in May 2010.In the course of the litigation she argued as follows: (i) her husband, Mr. OSTONOV was killed

    by governmental officials of RESMIN as a result of torture conducted by them and the

    Government of RESMIN is responsible for it; (ii) pursuant to Article 14 of the Convention

    against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the

    government of RESMIN is under obligation to pay compensation to the plaintiff. The

    government of RESMIN contended that as a sovereign State, RESMIN enjoys immunity from

    any domestic Courts in ASTRAL and the case should be dismissed. However, a local Court in

    ASTRAL (Court of first instance), in its judgment in November 2011, ruled in favor of

    SABENA, accepting all her arguments.

    Attorney of the RESMIN appealed to a Higher Court in ASTRAL (the Court of second

    instance) afterward, but by judgment in August 2012, the court dismissed the appeal. The

    attorney lodged final appeal to the Supreme Court of ASTRAL. In a judgment of December

    2012, the Court dismissed the appeal and ordered the Government of RESMIN to pay

    compensation which amounts to $10,000,000 to SABENA OSTONOV. The Government of

    RESMIN argued that the judgment of the supreme court of ASTRAL violates the rules of

    international law governing state immunity and that RESMIN is not under an obligation to

    respect the judgment, and at the same time, demanded the Government of ASTRAL to disaffirm

    the judgment which infringed international law.

    The government of ASTRAL, for its part, requested the government of RESMIN as

    follows: (i) to admit that the present Government of the RESMIN is responsible for killing of

    Mr. BEN OSTONOV under international law and to offer its apologies both for the

    Government of ASTRAL and for SABEBA OSTONOV; (ii) In addition, the Government of

    RESMIN shall pay appropriate compensation to SABENA OSTONOV.

    In April 2013, the Government of ASTRAL and the Government of RESMIN agreed to

    refer the legal dispute regarding the death of Mr. BEN OSTONOV to the International Court of

    Justice (ICJ) in accordance with article 36(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

    Both ASTRAL and RESMIN are founding members of the United Nations and the parties

    to the Statute of the international Court of Justice, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations,

    and Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, and the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties,

  • 7/25/2019 Asiacup2013 Problem Eng

    4/4

    and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and the

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Neither of them joins any

    Optional Protocols to the ICESCR and ICCPR. ASTRAL became a party to Convention againstTorture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in 1990 and

    RESMIN did so in 2009, but they are does not join the Optional Protocol to the Convention.

    ASTRAL is a party to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from

    Enforced Disappearances, but RESMIN is not. RESMIN ratified United Nations Convention on

    Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, but ASTRAL does not.

    *This case is not intended to be a description of an actual situation. The copyright belongs

    to the organizer of the International Law Moot Court Competition, Asia Cup 2013.