ASI Legal Perfromance Metrics

1

Click here to load reader

description

ASI Performance Metrics is targeted towards legal reviews. This application is designed to record, measure and report within the document review process. Adaptable to any document review platform, this unique metrics tool delivers unprecedented insight into accuracy, productivity and expenses.

Transcript of ASI Legal Perfromance Metrics

Page 1: ASI Legal Perfromance Metrics

.

Met

rics

Perf

orm

ance

& A

naly

sis M

etri

cs

Drill-down into an individual to gauge performance

ASI Performance Metrics is tailored for legal review managment. This application records, measures, and reports within thedocument review process. Adaptable to any document review platform, this unique metrics tool delivers unprecedented insight into accuracy, productivity and expenses.ASI Performance Metrics extracts data from document review systems and combines it with time and billing information to generate metrics for individual reviewers and for the review team. That information is used to improve performance, projectmanagement, quality control, and project duration.

Metrics: • Documents per hour & averages• Pages per hour & averages• Hours logged by reviewers • Documents reviewed • Documents re-reviewed • Documents with no tags • Pages reviewed • Documents received • Tags made • Documents first reviewed • Tags at the first, second & QC level • Additional tags added at first-level review • Document review costs at each level

Features: • Platform agnostic – any document review platform • Manage multiple projects simultaneously • Web-based, easy to use, and secure • Customizable expense reporting • Graphically display individual and group performance• Time and billing reporting by individual or task

Benefits: Allow Review Team document review clients to: • Finish projects ahead of schedule because problem areas are targeted early and performance is enhanced; • Access a consolidated history of individual reviewer skills for use on future projects; • Realize substantial cost savings because analysis and decision-making are based on real data;• Identify, then train or replace, under-performing reviewers in the initial stages of the project; • Flag less accurate individuals allowing QC to focus attention where it is needed most; • Share performance data with the review team, providing an incentive to achieve; and • Export data into spreadsheets for storage and internal use .

ASI Performance Metrics Copyright 2007 Argentto Systems, Inc All Rights Reserved

ChartIndividuals

vs.Group Averages