ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
Transcript of ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
1/21
1
Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab
Ben Sitler, PE
Arup Unified Method for Floors, Footbridges, Stairs and Other Structures
Footfall Induced Vibration
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
2/21
2
Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab2
Outline
Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration
Computing the Structural Response
Project Examples
References
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
3/21
3
Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab3
Introduction to Footfall InducedVibration
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
4/21
4
Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab4
When is footfall induced vibration an issue?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration
Low Frequency (Resonance) Low Mass (Acc=Force/Mass)
Low Damping
Large Dynamic Loads (Crowds)
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
5/21
5
Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab5
The design problemIntroduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response
Modal (structural) properties:
Loading:
consequences,
acceptability, ?????
Frequency
Modal mass
Mode shape
Damping
Amplitude
Frequency
Duration
Response
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
6/21
6
Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab6
What does a footfall time history look like?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
7/21
7 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab7
What kinds of excitation frequencies are possible?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
8/21
8 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab8
So how does this translate into a design load?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
9/21
9 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab9
What is an appropriate amount of damping?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
AmplificationFactor
(excitation frequency)/(natural frequency)
Steady State Resonant Amplification Factors for SDOF systems
0.02 damping
0.05 damping
0.10 damping
0.20 damping
Damping :: Frequency :: Modal Mass :: Mode Shape
Be suspicious of >2%
Footbridges 0.5~1.5%
Stairs 0.5%
Floors 1~3%
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
10/21
10 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab10
Modelling AssumptionsIntroduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response
Damping :: Frequency :: Modal Mass :: Mode Shape
some tips (not exhaustive)Loads Use best estimate, not code values LL: ~0.5kPa typically realistic SDL: upper/lower bound sensitivity study
Model Extent Typically model single floor only Floorplate should capture all modes of interestBoundary Conditions Fixed connections/supports unless true pin Faade vertical fixity may/may not be appropriateMember Modelling Orthotropic slab properties Composite beam (even if nominal studs) Ec,dynamic38GPa Subdivide 6+ elements per span
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
11/21
11 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab11
What is a good design criteria?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modelling :: Response
Situation R RMS Acc @ 5Hz
Low vibration 1 0.005 m/s2
Residential (night) 1.4 0.007 m/s2
Residential (day) 2-4 0.01~0.02 m/s2
Office (high grade) 4 0.02 m/s2
Office (normal) 8 0.04 m/s2
Footbridge (heavy) 24 0.12 m/s2
Footbridge (inside) 32 0.16 m/s2
Footbridge (outside) 64 0.32 m/s2
Stair (high use) 24 0.12 m/s2
Stair (light use) 32 0.16 m/s2
Stair (very light use) 64 0.32 m/s2
0.001
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Frequency (Hz)
rmsacceleration
(m/s2)
Approximate threshold of humanperception to vertical vibration
T 2t t
RMS RMS
Acc Peak,HarmonicRMS T
R=Acc Acc
AccAcc = =
2
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
12/21
12 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab12
Computing the Structural Response
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
13/21
13 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab13
Simplified vs Modal vs Time History MethodsComputing the Structural Response
vs
vs
Modal harmonic
response method
Explicit time history
method
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
14/21
14 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab14
F
orce
Time
Analytical ModelComputing the Structural Response
P
y
cK
My
Fo
rce
Time
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
15/21
15 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab15
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) i t
my t cy t ky t P t P e
Resonant ResponseComputing the Structural Response
Py
cK
M
,F W DLF f harmonic
2 2
2 22
2 22 2 2 2
1 1
1 2
1 2
1 2 1 2
h h
m m
h hh h
m mm m
h h h h
m m m m
dispf f
f f
f ff f
f f f f
f f f f
f f f f
kFRF
k m ic i
i
SDOF Harmonic Steady State Response
excition reponse
acc
FAcc FRF
m
Concrete Centre eq 4.4
h = harmonic forcing freq.
m = modal (structural) freq.
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
16/21
16 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab16
Transient ResponseComputing the Structural Response
Force
Time
SDOF Impulse RMS Velocity Response
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) i t
my t cy t ky t P t P e
1.43
1.354 [Ns]weff
n
fI
f
e ff e xc it io n r ep on se
Peak
IVel
m
( ) sintPeakVel t Vel e t
( )RMS mVel RMS Vel t
w = walking forcing freq.
m = modal (structural) freq.Concrete Centre eq 4.10~4.13
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
17/21
17 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab17
Bobbing Resonant ResponseComputing the Structural Response
12
2 2( )1 s a s s a a adisp
a a a a a
k k m i c c k i cFRFK M iC k i c k m i c
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
s s s a p a p s s a p a p s
a a a a a a a a
p p p p p p p p
m y c c c c c y k k k k k y P
m y c c y k k y P
m y c c y k k y
2
2 2
1(1,1) (1, 2) adisp
aa a s a s
a
mDMF FRF FRF
FRF ffk D k D D
f f
2
1 2a aa a
f fD i
f f
2
1 2s ss s
f fD i
f f
2
dispAcc P DMF
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) i ty t Cy t Ky t P t P e
,aP W GLF harmonic scenario
MDOF Harmonic Response crowd interacting with structure
IStructE Route 2
a = active crowd
p = passive crowd
s = structure
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
18/21
18 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab18
Programming ImplementationComputing the Structural Response
foreach node
// Get response of governing excitation frequency
RNode = MAX(RNode())
foreach excitation frequency
// Get R Factor
RNode() = AccRMS,Node() / AccRMS,0()
// Get SRSS acceleration
AccRMS,Node()
= (Mode
Harmonic
AccRMS(n,m,h,*h)
2)
foreach mode
// Get modal properties
// modal frequency (), damping () & mass (m)
// displacement at excitation(ne) & response(nr) nodes
// ,
m,m,mm,ne,nr,Wm,m = ...
foreach harmonic
// Get harmonic properties
// dynamic amplification factor(DLF), harmonic freq ()
DLF,h,m,h = ...
// Get RMS acceleration
AccRMS(n,m,h,*h)=RMS(F(m,h,m,mm,ne,nr,DLF,h,Wm,m))
2000 nodes x 20 modes x 4 harmonics x 1.5Hz
frequency range = 2.4E7 calculations
not practical back in 90s, hence the simplified
methods in AISC DG11, AS 5100-2, etc
6000 nodes x 40 modes x 2 harmonics x 6Hz
frequency range (running) = 2.8E8 calculations
Excel VBA is single threaded so no parallel processing
Suggest building with parallel libraries in C#, VB, Python, etc
Footbridge GSA model
Library floor GSA model
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
19/21
19 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab19
Some Examples
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
20/21
20 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab20
How can we improve response?Examples
Increase Damping Increase Frequency
Increase Stiffness
Decrease Mass
Increase Mass Isolate
-
7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf
21/21
21 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab21
Further ReadingQuestions?
General Structures (Vertical Resonant or Transient of Pedestrians) Concrete Centre CCIP-016A design guide for Footfall Induced Vibration of Structures
SCI P354 Design of Floors for Vibration
Stadia & Concert Hall (Vertical Resonance of Bobbing Crowd)
IStructE Dynamic Performance Requirements for Permanent Grandstands Subject to
Crowd Action C. Jones, A. Pavic, P. Reynold, R. Harrison Verification of Equivalent Mass-Spring-Damper
Models for Crowd-Structure Vibration Response Prediction
High Use Footbridges (Lateral Synchronous Lock in and Vertical Crowd)
P. Dallard The London Millenium Footbridge
BSI PD 6688-2:2011 Background to National Annex to BS EN 1991-2: Traffic loads on
bridges
Setra Footbridges: Assessment of Vibrational Behaviour of Footbridges under Pedestrian
Loading
contact: [email protected]