ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

download ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

of 21

Transcript of ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    1/21

    1

    Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab

    Ben Sitler, PE

    Arup Unified Method for Floors, Footbridges, Stairs and Other Structures

    Footfall Induced Vibration

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    2/21

    2

    Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab2

    Outline

    Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration

    Computing the Structural Response

    Project Examples

    References

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    3/21

    3

    Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab3

    Introduction to Footfall InducedVibration

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    4/21

    4

    Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab4

    When is footfall induced vibration an issue?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration

    Low Frequency (Resonance) Low Mass (Acc=Force/Mass)

    Low Damping

    Large Dynamic Loads (Crowds)

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    5/21

    5

    Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab5

    The design problemIntroduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response

    Modal (structural) properties:

    Loading:

    consequences,

    acceptability, ?????

    Frequency

    Modal mass

    Mode shape

    Damping

    Amplitude

    Frequency

    Duration

    Response

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    6/21

    6

    Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab6

    What does a footfall time history look like?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    7/21

    7 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab7

    What kinds of excitation frequencies are possible?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    8/21

    8 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab8

    So how does this translate into a design load?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    9/21

    9 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab9

    What is an appropriate amount of damping?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    AmplificationFactor

    (excitation frequency)/(natural frequency)

    Steady State Resonant Amplification Factors for SDOF systems

    0.02 damping

    0.05 damping

    0.10 damping

    0.20 damping

    Damping :: Frequency :: Modal Mass :: Mode Shape

    Be suspicious of >2%

    Footbridges 0.5~1.5%

    Stairs 0.5%

    Floors 1~3%

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    10/21

    10 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab10

    Modelling AssumptionsIntroduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modal Properties :: Response

    Damping :: Frequency :: Modal Mass :: Mode Shape

    some tips (not exhaustive)Loads Use best estimate, not code values LL: ~0.5kPa typically realistic SDL: upper/lower bound sensitivity study

    Model Extent Typically model single floor only Floorplate should capture all modes of interestBoundary Conditions Fixed connections/supports unless true pin Faade vertical fixity may/may not be appropriateMember Modelling Orthotropic slab properties Composite beam (even if nominal studs) Ec,dynamic38GPa Subdivide 6+ elements per span

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    11/21

    11 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab11

    What is a good design criteria?Introduction to Footfall Induced Vibration :: Loading :: Modelling :: Response

    Situation R RMS Acc @ 5Hz

    Low vibration 1 0.005 m/s2

    Residential (night) 1.4 0.007 m/s2

    Residential (day) 2-4 0.01~0.02 m/s2

    Office (high grade) 4 0.02 m/s2

    Office (normal) 8 0.04 m/s2

    Footbridge (heavy) 24 0.12 m/s2

    Footbridge (inside) 32 0.16 m/s2

    Footbridge (outside) 64 0.32 m/s2

    Stair (high use) 24 0.12 m/s2

    Stair (light use) 32 0.16 m/s2

    Stair (very light use) 64 0.32 m/s2

    0.001

    0.01

    0.1

    1 10 100

    Frequency (Hz)

    rmsacceleration

    (m/s2)

    Approximate threshold of humanperception to vertical vibration

    T 2t t

    RMS RMS

    Acc Peak,HarmonicRMS T

    R=Acc Acc

    AccAcc = =

    2

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    12/21

    12 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab12

    Computing the Structural Response

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    13/21

    13 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab13

    Simplified vs Modal vs Time History MethodsComputing the Structural Response

    vs

    vs

    Modal harmonic

    response method

    Explicit time history

    method

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    14/21

    14 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab14

    F

    orce

    Time

    Analytical ModelComputing the Structural Response

    P

    y

    cK

    My

    Fo

    rce

    Time

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    15/21

    15 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab15

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) i t

    my t cy t ky t P t P e

    Resonant ResponseComputing the Structural Response

    Py

    cK

    M

    ,F W DLF f harmonic

    2 2

    2 22

    2 22 2 2 2

    1 1

    1 2

    1 2

    1 2 1 2

    h h

    m m

    h hh h

    m mm m

    h h h h

    m m m m

    dispf f

    f f

    f ff f

    f f f f

    f f f f

    f f f f

    kFRF

    k m ic i

    i

    SDOF Harmonic Steady State Response

    excition reponse

    acc

    FAcc FRF

    m

    Concrete Centre eq 4.4

    h = harmonic forcing freq.

    m = modal (structural) freq.

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    16/21

    16 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab16

    Transient ResponseComputing the Structural Response

    Force

    Time

    SDOF Impulse RMS Velocity Response

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) i t

    my t cy t ky t P t P e

    1.43

    1.354 [Ns]weff

    n

    fI

    f

    e ff e xc it io n r ep on se

    Peak

    IVel

    m

    ( ) sintPeakVel t Vel e t

    ( )RMS mVel RMS Vel t

    w = walking forcing freq.

    m = modal (structural) freq.Concrete Centre eq 4.10~4.13

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    17/21

    17 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab17

    Bobbing Resonant ResponseComputing the Structural Response

    12

    2 2( )1 s a s s a a adisp

    a a a a a

    k k m i c c k i cFRFK M iC k i c k m i c

    0 0

    0 0 0 0

    0 0 0 0 0

    s s s a p a p s s a p a p s

    a a a a a a a a

    p p p p p p p p

    m y c c c c c y k k k k k y P

    m y c c y k k y P

    m y c c y k k y

    2

    2 2

    1(1,1) (1, 2) adisp

    aa a s a s

    a

    mDMF FRF FRF

    FRF ffk D k D D

    f f

    2

    1 2a aa a

    f fD i

    f f

    2

    1 2s ss s

    f fD i

    f f

    2

    dispAcc P DMF

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) i ty t Cy t Ky t P t P e

    ,aP W GLF harmonic scenario

    MDOF Harmonic Response crowd interacting with structure

    IStructE Route 2

    a = active crowd

    p = passive crowd

    s = structure

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    18/21

    18 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab18

    Programming ImplementationComputing the Structural Response

    foreach node

    // Get response of governing excitation frequency

    RNode = MAX(RNode())

    foreach excitation frequency

    // Get R Factor

    RNode() = AccRMS,Node() / AccRMS,0()

    // Get SRSS acceleration

    AccRMS,Node()

    = (Mode

    Harmonic

    AccRMS(n,m,h,*h)

    2)

    foreach mode

    // Get modal properties

    // modal frequency (), damping () & mass (m)

    // displacement at excitation(ne) & response(nr) nodes

    // ,

    m,m,mm,ne,nr,Wm,m = ...

    foreach harmonic

    // Get harmonic properties

    // dynamic amplification factor(DLF), harmonic freq ()

    DLF,h,m,h = ...

    // Get RMS acceleration

    AccRMS(n,m,h,*h)=RMS(F(m,h,m,mm,ne,nr,DLF,h,Wm,m))

    2000 nodes x 20 modes x 4 harmonics x 1.5Hz

    frequency range = 2.4E7 calculations

    not practical back in 90s, hence the simplified

    methods in AISC DG11, AS 5100-2, etc

    6000 nodes x 40 modes x 2 harmonics x 6Hz

    frequency range (running) = 2.8E8 calculations

    Excel VBA is single threaded so no parallel processing

    Suggest building with parallel libraries in C#, VB, Python, etc

    Footbridge GSA model

    Library floor GSA model

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    19/21

    19 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab19

    Some Examples

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    20/21

    20 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab20

    How can we improve response?Examples

    Increase Damping Increase Frequency

    Increase Stiffness

    Decrease Mass

    Increase Mass Isolate

  • 7/26/2019 ASG-Bridge-Vibration-Presentation-28-March-2016.pdf

    21/21

    21 Tok o Institute of Technolo Takeuchi Lab21

    Further ReadingQuestions?

    General Structures (Vertical Resonant or Transient of Pedestrians) Concrete Centre CCIP-016A design guide for Footfall Induced Vibration of Structures

    SCI P354 Design of Floors for Vibration

    Stadia & Concert Hall (Vertical Resonance of Bobbing Crowd)

    IStructE Dynamic Performance Requirements for Permanent Grandstands Subject to

    Crowd Action C. Jones, A. Pavic, P. Reynold, R. Harrison Verification of Equivalent Mass-Spring-Damper

    Models for Crowd-Structure Vibration Response Prediction

    High Use Footbridges (Lateral Synchronous Lock in and Vertical Crowd)

    P. Dallard The London Millenium Footbridge

    BSI PD 6688-2:2011 Background to National Annex to BS EN 1991-2: Traffic loads on

    bridges

    Setra Footbridges: Assessment of Vibrational Behaviour of Footbridges under Pedestrian

    Loading

    contact: [email protected]