ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLING ESTES PARK ...
Transcript of ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLING ESTES PARK ...
400 N. Link Lane | Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Telephone: 970-206-9455 | Fax: 970-206-9441
ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLING 543 ELM ROAD
ESTES PARK, COLORADO
Prepared for:
Larimer County 200 W Oak Street
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Attention:
Project No. FC08777.000-221
March 7, 2019
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................... i
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1
2.0 ASBESTOS METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 1
3.0 ASBESTOS INSPECTION PROCEDURE ........................................................... 2 3.1 Asbestos Sample Collection ...................................................................... 2 3.2 Asbestos/Lead Sample Analysis ................................................................ 2
4.0 ASBESTOS REGULATORY CRITERIA ............................................................... 3
5.0 ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS .................................................................. 4
6.0 PAINT CHIP SAMPLING ...................................................................................... 4
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE ASBESTOS REGULATIONS
TABLE 1 – ASBESTOS SURVEY SUMMARY
TABLE 2 – PAINT CHIP SAMPLE SUMMARY
FIGURE 1 – OVERVIEW
FIGURE 2 – MAIN BUILDING SAMPLE LOCATIONS
FIGURE 3 – SHED SAMPLE LOCATIONS
APPENDIX A – SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX B – ASBESTOS LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
APPENDIX C – LEAD PAINT LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
APPENDIX D – CTL│THOMPSON CERTIFICATIONS
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
i
ACRONYMS
Commonly Used Acronyms
ACBM Asbestos Containing Building Materials
ACM Asbestos Containing Materials
AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
HA Homogeneous Area
HEPA High Efficiency Particulate Air
HVAC Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
O&M Operations and Maintenance
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PCM Phase Contrast Microscopy
PLM Polarized Light Microscopy
RBM Regulated Building Material
TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy
TSI Thermal System Insulation
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Larimer County retained CTL | Thompson, Inc. (CTL) to perform an asbestos
survey and lead based paint sampling of three buildings located at 543 Elm Road in
Estes Park, Colorado. The Site buildings include the main maintenance building and two
sheds. Mr. Dana Harris, certified CDPHE Asbestos Inspector Cert#: 10152 performed
the survey on February 26, 2019. We observed and sampled suspect asbestos
containing building materials and lead based paint on the structures. All observed suspect
asbestos containing building materials were sampled according to AHERA regulations.
2.0 ASBESTOS METHODOLOGY
The purpose of the asbestos inspection was to identify the condition and location
of friable and non-friable asbestos materials that are present on the structures. During the
asbestos materials survey, CTL performed the following tasks:
Inspected accessible areas for suspected asbestos materials;
Determined friability of suspected asbestos materials by touching;
Developed a sampling plan for each material based on the homogeneous
material type, friability, accessibility, and material locations;
Assessed the condition and potential hazards of the suspected asbestos materials;
Collected samples of suspected homogeneous and non-homogeneous
materials and submitted them for laboratory analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM); and,
Documented findings and inspection protocol in accordance with accepted
industry standards.
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
2
3.0 ASBESTOS INSPECTION PROCEDURE
CTL was not provided with building specifications or as-built drawings. During
assessment and sampling, suspect ACMs were grouped into homogeneous areas, which
are defined as areas of suspect ACM that are uniform in color and texture.
Homogeneous areas of suspect ACM were identified by visually inspecting the following
systems in each portion of the building surveyed:
Flooring systems
Wall/partition systems
Ceiling systems
Miscellaneous systems
Exterior systems
3.1 Asbestos Sample Collection
CTL collected bulk samples of the suspected friable and non-friable (that would
become friable during demolition) asbestos materials in a random and representative
manner, as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) statistical
sampling methods. The collected samples were packaged in sealed and labeled
containers.
3.2 Asbestos/Lead Sample Analysis
The bulk samples of suspected asbestos materials were submitted to Reservoirs
Environmental, Inc. for analysis. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is accredited by the
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) (Lab Code 101896-0) and
the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) (Accreditation Certificate #101533).
Individual layers of the samples were analyzed by PLM (Polarized Light Microscopy) to
determine asbestos type and content. Unused portions of the samples were archived for
60 days, unless the client requested special handling. By regulation, any single positive
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
3
asbestos sample classifies the entire homogeneous material as asbestos-containing and
additional analysis is not required.
4.0 ASBESTOS REGULATORY CRITERIA
According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment (CDPHE), samples with asbestos concentrations greater than 1 percent
(>1%) are classified as asbestos containing materials and are a regulated material. If a
building structure is scheduled for renovation or demolition, friable samples that contain
Trace amounts of asbestos (1% or less) must be further analyzed by a more accurate
point-count analysis to determine if they exceed the 1 percent threshold, or the materials
must be assumed to contain asbestos and be classified as a regulated material.
The EPA and OSHA distinguish between friable and non-friable forms of asbestos
materials. Friable materials can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure
when dry. Non-friable materials cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by
hand pressure when dry. Friable materials are more likely to be released into the air,
especially if impacted or damaged during normal use, renovation, or demolition of a
building. Therefore, the distinction between friable and non-friable asbestos materials is
important. The EPA further segregates non-friable asbestos materials into Category I or
Category II. Category I non-friable asbestos materials include floor tiles and roofing felts.
Removal of these asbestos materials is not required prior to demolition as long as they
are in good condition and not friable and/or rendered friable. Category II asbestos
materials are all other non-friable asbestos materials, and may be required to be removed
prior to demolition if those materials will be rendered friable.
Whether removed or remaining in a structure during demolition, the confirmed or
presumed asbestos materials are subject to EPA National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and OSHA regulations. In 40 CFR 61.145, NESHAP
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
4
requires that each owner or operator of a demolition activity provide the administrator with
written notice of intent. The CDPHE has implemented the NESHAP program.
5.0 ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS
An overview of the Site is presented on Figure 1.
The main maintenance building was observed to be a steel and concrete structure,
with fiberglass batt insulation on the interior walls and ceilings. The main maintenance
building is divided into three bays, with northeast bay further divided into office and
storage areas. The main maintenance building is approximately 3,700 square feet in
size. The two sheds are wooden structures, with approximate square footages of 250
square feet (central shed) and 192 square feet (south shed).
Results of the asbestos analyses for the homogeneous materials collected are
summarized below and on Table 1, attached. Sample locations are shown on attached
Figures 2 and 3. Site photographs are presented in Appendix A. Laboratory reports for
the samples are presented in Appendix B.
As shown on the attached laboratory report, no asbestos was identified in the
samples collected from either shed. The following homogeneous areas within the main
maintenance building contained asbestos:
HA# 1 – window glazing/putty – this material contained trace chrysotile asbestos
and was nonfriable. Because this material did not contain greater than 1%
asbestos, it is not classified as an ACM and does not have to be removed prior to
demolition. However, if left in place, OSHA asbestos regulations will apply to
demolition workers potentially exposed to asbestos.
HA# 2 – drywall joint compound – the joint compound contained 1.25 % chrysotile
asbestos, as verified by point-count re-analysis. The composite analysis contained
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
5
0.05% asbestos. Because the composite result was not greater than 1%
asbestos, the material does not have to be removed prior to demolition. However,
if left in place, OSHA regulations will consider this material an ACM (because the
joint compound itself contained greater than 1% asbestos), the demolition will be
considered an OSHA Class II asbestos activity, and applicable OSHA regulations,
will apply to workers potentially exposed to asbestos during demolition. Among
other requirements, the OSHA requirements for Class II work include 8-32 hours of
specialized training, use of a properly-trained OSHA Competent Person, use of
wet methods, respiratory protection, and exposure monitoring.
6.0 PAINT CHIP SAMPLING
We conducted sampling for lead containing paint. One paint chip sample was
collected from each color of paint on each substrate. We collected a total of 5 paint chip
samples, as summarized on Table 2. We also collected one composite sample of
representative building materials that will end up as wastes for disposal upon demolition
of the buildings.
As shown on Table 2 and presented in Appendix C, the paint chip samples con-
tained up to 2.6% lead, which is above 20 times the lead characteristic hazardous waste
limit of 5 parts per million (5 ppm), or 0.01%/100 ppm. Therefore, the composite sample
of building components was submitted for lead TCLP analysis. As shown on Table 2
and presented in Appendix C, the TCLP lead concentration for the composite building
material sample was less than the laboratory reporting limit of 0.04 milligrams per liter
(mg/l). This is less than the hazardous waste characteristic limit for lead of 5 mg/l.
Based on this, building waste will not need to be treated as hazardous waste.
Note: Any contractor disturbing lead containing materials must comply with OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 Lead in Construction Standard.
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
6
If we can be of further service discussing the contents of this report, please call us.
Very truly yours,
CTL | THOMPSON, INC. Dana L. Harris Environmental Department Manager Asbestos Inspector #10152 Reviewed by:
Brandon Edwards Environmental Technician Asbestos Inspector #24589
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE ASBESTOS REGULATIONS
OSHA: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety, and Health Administration,
including but not limited to:
Occupational Exposure to Asbestos, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolite;
Final Rules Title 29, Part 1910, Section 1325 and Part 1926, Section 1101
of the Code of Federal Regulations;
Respiratory Protection Standard Title 29, Part 1910, Section 134 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
Construction Industry Title 29, Part 1926, of the Code of Federal
Regulations;
Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Title 29, Part 1910, Section 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
Hazard Communication Title 29, Part 1926 Section 59 of the Code of
Federal Regulations; and
Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags Title 29, Part 1910, Section 145 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
DOT: U.S. Department of Transportation, including but not limited to:
Hazardous Substances Title 29, Part 171 and 172 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
EPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, including but not limited to:
Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Regulation; Asbestos Containing Materials in Schools Final Rule & Notice Title 40, Part
763 Sub-part E of the Code of Federal Regulations;
Training Requirements of (AHERA) Regulation;
Asbestos Containing Materials in Schools Final Rule & Notice Title 40,Part 763, Sub-part E, Appendix C of the Code of Federal Regulations;
National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS); and
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
National Emission Standard for Asbestos Title 40, Part 61, Sub-part A, Sub-part M (Revised Sub-part B) of the Code of Federal Regulations.
CDPHE: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, including but not limited to:
Air Quality Control Commission, Regulation No. 8, Part B “Emissions Standards for Asbestos”; and
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division, 6 CCR 1007-2,
Section 5 “Asbestos Waste Management.”
Figure 1. Overview map – Asbestos and Lead Survey, 543 Elm Road, Estes Park, Colorado. CTL Project No. FC08777.000-221.
Main Building Main Building
Southwest Shed
Middle Shed
N
Not To
Scale
Figure 2. Asbestos and Paint Chip Sample Locations and Confirmed Asbestos Locations, Main Building 543 Elm Road, Estes Park, Colorado. CTL Project No.
FC08777.000-221.
N
Not To
Scale 1
2
4
5, 6
7
8
9 10
Legend
1 Asbestos Sample Location (last two digits of sample no.)
LP-1 Paint chip sample location
HA#1 – window glazing/putty
HA# 2 – Drywall joint compound
Figure 3. Asbestos and Paint Chip Sample Locations and Confirmed Asbestos Locations, Sheds, 543 Elm Road, Estes Park, Colorado. CTL Project No. FC08777.000-221.
N
Not To
Scale
Legend
1 Asbestos Sample Location (last two digits of sample no.)
LP-1 Paint chip sample location
Table 1
Asbestos Survey Summary
543 Elm Road
Estes Park, Colorado
CTL Project No. FC08777.000-221
BuildingHA# Sample No. Description
Sample
Location
Sample Ht. (ft,
aprox.)Asbestos Content Locations Observed
Estimated
QuantityACM Friability
ACM
Condition1-WGL-1 Window glazing/putty, gray See Fig. 2 6 Trace Chrysotile
1-WGL-2 Window glazing/putty, gray See Fig. 2 6 Trace Chrysotile
2-DWJC-3 Drywall joint compound See Fig. 2 4 None Detected
2-DWJC-4 Drywall joint compound See Fig. 2 4
Drywall - ND
J.C. - 1.25%
Chrysotile (pt. ct.)
Composite: 0.05%
3-CPAD-5 Carpet adhesive, yellow See Fig. 2 0 None Detected
3-CPAD-6 Carpet adhesive, yellow See Fig. 2 0 None Detected4-CBA-7 Cove base adhesive, white See Fig. 2 1 None Detected
4-CBA-8 Cove base adhesive, white See Fig. 2 1 None Detected
5-FTMS-9 12" x 12" floor tile, tan and mastic See Fig. 2 0 None Detected
5-FTMS-10 12" x 12" floor tile, tan and mastic See Fig. 2 0 None Detected
6-DCLK-11 Door frame caulk, gray See Fig. 2 4 None Detected
6-DCLK-12 Door frame caulk, gray See Fig. 2 4 None Detected
7-WGL-13 Window glazing/putty, beige See Fig. 2 5 None Detected
7-WGL-14 Window glazing/putty, beige See Fig. 2 5 None Detected
8-CLK-15 Caulking, white See Fig. 2 4 None Detected
8-CLK-16 Caulking, white See Fig. 2 4 None Detected
9-WCLK-17 Window frame caulk, gray See Fig. 2 5 None Detected
9-WCLK-18 Window frame caulk, gray See Fig. 2 5 None Detected
10-WGL-19 Window glazing/putty, white See Fig. 3 5 None Detected
10-WGL-20 Window glazing/putty, white See Fig. 3 5 None Detected11-RSHG-21 Roof shingle, green See Fig. 3 7 None Detected
11-RSHG-22 Roof shingle, green See Fig. 3 7 None Detected
12-RSHG-23 Roof shingle, gray See Fig. 3 7 None Detected
12-RSHG-24 Roof shingle, gray See Fig. 3 7 None Detected
13-WGL-25 Window glazing/putty, white See Fig. 3 4 None Detected
13-WGL-26 Window glazing/putty, white See Fig. 3 4 None Detected
Middle
Shed
S-West
Shed
70 SF
1 SF
Windows
7
8
9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AMain
Building
2 SF
1390 SF
280 SF
10 SF
Central bay windows
NE office area
NE office area
1 SF
10 SF
1 SF
N/A
N/A
2 SF N/A N/A
Nonfriable
Nonfriable
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 SF
168 SF
N/A168 SF
1
2
3
5
4 NE office area
NE bathroom
N. door6
10
11
NE-North window
Exterior
penetrations
NE-south window
Window
Roof - lower layer
13
Roof - upper layer12
Yellow highlight: ACM
Orange highlight: contains asbestos at or less than 1% Page 1 of 1
Table 2
Paint Chip Sample Summary
543 Elm Road, Estes Park, Colorado
CTL Project No. FC08777.000-221
Building Sample No. DescriptionSample
Location
Paint Chip Sample
Lead ContentTCLP Result
LP-1 White paint on drywall See Fig. 2 < 0.001 % N/A
LP-2 White paint on wood See Fig. 2 < 0.004 % N/A
LP-3 White paint on concrete See Fig. 2 < 0.003 %
LP-5 White paint on metal See Fig. 2 2.6 %
S-West
ShedLP-4
Gray paint on wood See Fig. 3 0.011 %N/A
All
BuildingsBLDGWASTE-1 Composite from all buildings
Composite
from
all buildingsN/A
< 0.04
milligrams per
liter
Main
BuildingN/A
Page 1 of 1
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
APPENDIX A
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Site Photographs – Asbestos/Lead Survey 543 Elm Road
Estes Park, Colorado February 2019
Page 1 of 3 CTL|T Project No. FC08777.000-200
HA# 1 – window glazing/putty HA# 2 – drywall joint compound
HA# 3 – carpet adhesive HA# 4 cove base adhesive
Site Photographs – Asbestos/Lead Survey 543 Elm Road
Estes Park, Colorado February 2019
Page 2 of 3 CTL|T Project No. FC08777.000-200
HA# 5 – floor tile HA# 6 – door frame caulk
HA# 7 – window galzing/putty HA# 8 - caulking
Site Photographs – Asbestos/Lead Survey 543 Elm Road
Estes Park, Colorado February 2019
Page 3 of 3 CTL|T Project No. FC08777.000-200
HA# 9 – window frame caulking HA# 10 – window glazing/putty
HA# 11, 12 – roof shingles HA# 13 – window glazing/putty
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
APPENDIX B
ASBESTOS LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective April 2, 2018
Q:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
Subcontract Number: NA
Laboratory Report: RES 429210-3
Project # / P.O. # FC08777.000-221
Project Description: 543 Elm Rd., Estes Park, CO
RES 429210-3
Sincerely,
is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential
and the sole property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with
personnel other than those of the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed.
This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or any agency of the
U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs
Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you have any
questions about this report, please feel free to call 303-964-1986.
Jeanne Spencer
President
March 5, 2019
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and
Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab Code 101896-0
for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and the American
Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Lab ID 101533 - Accreditation Certificate #480 for Phase Contrast
Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This laboratory is currently proficient in both Proficiency Testing and PAT programs
respectively.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your request. The
analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the attached
analysis table. The results have been submitted to your office.
CTL/Thompson, Inc. (Ft. Collins)
400 North Link Lane
Ft. Collins CO 80524
Dana Harris
P: 303-964-1986
F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 1 of 1
1-866-RESI-ENV
www.reilab.com
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Turnaround:
Date Samples Analyzed:
RES 429210-3
CTL/Thompson, Inc. (Ft. Collins)
FC08777.000-221
543 Elm Rd., Estes Park, CO
February 28, 2019
Priority
February 28, 2019
TABLE: PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective April 2, 2018
Q:\QAQC\LAB\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
Client
Sample
Number
Lab
ID Number
LAYER
Mineral
Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Point Count, Bulk
PhysicalDescription
SubPart
(%)
Visual
Estimate
(%)
ND=None DetectedTR=Trace, <1% Visual EstimateTrem/Act=Tremolite/Actinolite
NonAsbestosFibrous
Components(%)
Non-Fibrous
Components
(%)
Asbestos Content
10001-WGL-1 EM 2260651 Gray glazingA 100 TR Chrysotile
10001-WGL-2 EM 2260652 Gray glazingA 100 TR Chrysotile
10002-DWJC-3 EM 2260653 Light beige paint w/ white compoundA 5 ND
8020Light pink/tan drywallB 95 ND
10002-DWJC-4 EM 2260654 Off white paint w/ off white compoundA 1 TR Chrysotile
0.75 Point Count980White paint w/ white compoundB 3 2 Chrysotile
1.25 Point Count1000Light beige paint w/ white compoundC 4 ND
6040White/tan drywallD 92 ND
0.05 Composite
10003-CPAD-5 EM 2260655 Gray paintA 10 ND
1000Tan adhesiveB 90 ND
TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
Only compound, tape and wallboard layers are used in the calculation of a composite result.
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100, Denver, CO 80216
Page 1 of 4
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Turnaround:
Date Samples Analyzed:
RES 429210-3
CTL/Thompson, Inc. (Ft. Collins)
FC08777.000-221
543 Elm Rd., Estes Park, CO
February 28, 2019
Priority
February 28, 2019
TABLE: PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective April 2, 2018
Q:\QAQC\LAB\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
Client
Sample
Number
Lab
ID Number
LAYER
Mineral
Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Point Count, Bulk
PhysicalDescription
SubPart
(%)
Visual
Estimate
(%)
ND=None DetectedTR=Trace, <1% Visual EstimateTrem/Act=Tremolite/Actinolite
NonAsbestosFibrous
Components(%)
Non-Fibrous
Components
(%)
Asbestos Content
10003-CPAD-6 EM 2260656 Gray paintA 10 ND
1000Tan adhesiveB 90 ND
60404-CBA-7 EM 2260657 Off white paint w/ off white paperA 6 ND
1000Off white adhesiveB 9 ND
1000Gray cove baseC 85 ND
65354-CBA-8 EM 2260658 White paint w/ off white paperA 3 ND
1000Brown adhesive w/ white paintB 5 ND
1000Off white adhesiveC 7 ND
1000Gray cove baseD 85 ND
10005-FTMS-9 EM 2260659 Tan adhesive w/ gray paintA 7 ND
1000Light beige tileB 93 ND
9825-FTMS-10 EM 2260660 Light tan adhesiveA 2 ND
1000Light beige tileB 98 ND
TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
Only compound, tape and wallboard layers are used in the calculation of a composite result.
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100, Denver, CO 80216
Page 2 of 4
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Turnaround:
Date Samples Analyzed:
RES 429210-3
CTL/Thompson, Inc. (Ft. Collins)
FC08777.000-221
543 Elm Rd., Estes Park, CO
February 28, 2019
Priority
February 28, 2019
TABLE: PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective April 2, 2018
Q:\QAQC\LAB\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
Client
Sample
Number
Lab
ID Number
LAYER
Mineral
Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Point Count, Bulk
PhysicalDescription
SubPart
(%)
Visual
Estimate
(%)
ND=None DetectedTR=Trace, <1% Visual EstimateTrem/Act=Tremolite/Actinolite
NonAsbestosFibrous
Components(%)
Non-Fibrous
Components
(%)
Asbestos Content
10006-DCLK-11 EM 2260661 Colorless resinous materialA 100 ND
9826-DCLK-12 EM 2260662 Colorless resinous materialA 100 ND
10007-WGL-13 EM 2260663 Brown resinous materialA 100 ND
10007-WGL-14 EM 2260664 Brown resinous materialA 100 ND
10008-CLK-15 EM 2260665 Light gray resinous materialA 100 ND
10008-CLK-16 EM 2260666 Light gray resinous materialA 100 ND
10009-WCLK-17 EM 2260667 White caulkA 100 ND
10009-WCLK-18 EM 2260668 White caulkA 100 ND
100010-WGL-19 EM 2260669 Light tan glazingA 100 ND
100010-WGL-20 EM 2260670 Light tan glazingA 100 ND
653511-RSHG-21 EM 2260671 Green/black shingleA 100 ND
604011-RSHG-22 EM 2260672 Green/black shingleA 100 ND
653512-RSHG-23 EM 2260673 White/green/black shingleA 100 ND
653512-RSHG-24 EM 2260674 White/green/black shingleA 100 ND
TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
Only compound, tape and wallboard layers are used in the calculation of a composite result.
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100, Denver, CO 80216
Page 3 of 4
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Turnaround:
Date Samples Analyzed:
RES 429210-3
CTL/Thompson, Inc. (Ft. Collins)
FC08777.000-221
543 Elm Rd., Estes Park, CO
February 28, 2019
Priority
February 28, 2019
TABLE: PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective April 2, 2018
Q:\QAQC\LAB\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
Client
Sample
Number
Lab
ID Number
LAYER
Mineral
Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 - Point Count, Bulk
PhysicalDescription
SubPart
(%)
Visual
Estimate
(%)
ND=None DetectedTR=Trace, <1% Visual EstimateTrem/Act=Tremolite/Actinolite
NonAsbestosFibrous
Components(%)
Non-Fibrous
Components
(%)
Asbestos Content
100013-WGL-25 EM 2260675 White glazing w/ gray paintA 100 ND
100013-WGL-26 EM 2260676 Off white glazingA 5 ND
1000White glazing w/ gray paintB 95 ND
TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
Data QAAnalystAnalystAnalystAnalyst
Only compound, tape and wallboard layers are used in the calculation of a composite result.
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100, Denver, CO 80216
Page 4 of 4
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
APPENDIX C
LEAD PAINT LABORATORY RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective April 2, 2018Q:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
Laboratory Code: RESSubcontract Number: NALaboratory Report: RES 429210-2Project # / PO #: FC08777.000-221Project Description:
RES 429210-2
Sincerely,
Jeanne Spencer
President
February 28, 2019
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs has analyzed the following sample(s) using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) / Inductively CoupledPlasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) per your request. Reported sample results were not blank corrected. Theanalysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the analysis table.Results have been sent to your office.
property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with personnel other thanthose authorized by the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed. This report shallnot be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposedof after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you should have any questions about this report, please feelfree to call me at 303-964-1986.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene andEnvironmental matrices by the American Industrial Hygiene Association, Lab ID 101533 - Accreditation Certificate #480.The laboratory is currently proficient in both IHPAT & ELPAT programs respectively.
is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential and the sole
543 Elm Rd., Estes Park, CO
Ft. Collins CO 80524400 North Link Lane
Dana HarrisCTL/Thompson, Inc. (Ft. Collins)
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 1 of 2
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective April 2, 2018Q:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RES Job Number:Client:Client Project Number / P.O.:Client Project Description:Date Samples Received:Analysis Type:Turnaround:Date Samples Analyzed:
Client Lab Reporting LEAD
ID Number ID Number Limit CONCENTRATION(%) (%)
LP-1 EM 2260677 0.001 BRL
LP-2 EM 2260678 0.001 0.004
LP-3 EM 2260679 0.003 BRL
LP-4 EM 2260680 0.001 2.6
LP-5 EM 2260681 0.002 0.011
Analyst / Data QA:________________________
Priority
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.5801 Logan St., Suite 100
Denver CO 80216
TABLE ANALYSIS: LEAD IN PAINT
RES 429210-2
February 28, 2019
* Unless otherwise noted, all quality control samples are performed within specifications established by the laboratory.
CTL/Thompson, Inc. (Ft. Collins)FC08777.000-221543 Elm Rd., Estes Park, COFebruary 28, 2019REI CHEMISTRY SOP / USEPA SW846 3050B/7420-M
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 2 of 2
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
1903038
Dana Harris
Wednesday, March 06, 2019
Ft. Collins, Colorado
CTL Thompson400 N. Link LaneFort Collins, CO 80524
ALS Workorder:Re:543 Elm RoadProject Name:FC08777.000-221Project Number:
LIMS Version: 6.893
One solid sample was received from CTL Thompson, on 3/1/2019. The sample was scheduled for the following analysis:
Dear Mr. Harris:
Page 1 of 1
Metals
The results for these analyses are contained in the enclosed reports.
Thank you for your confidence in ALS Environmental. Should you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
ALS EnvironmentalKatie M. OBrienProject Manager
The data contained in the following report have been reviewed and approved by the personnel listed below. In addition, ALS certifies that the analyses reported herein are true, complete and correct within the limits of the methods employed.
ADDRESS 225 Commerce Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA 80524 | PHONE +1 970 490 1511 | FAX +1 970 490 1522ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Part of the ALS Laboratory Group An ALS Limited Company
1 of 9
ALS Environmental – Fort Collins is accredited by the following accreditation bodies for various testing scopes in accordance with requirements of each accreditation body. All testing is performed under the laboratory management system, which is maintained to meet these requirement and regulations. Please contact the laboratory or accreditation body for the current scope testing parameters.
ALS Environmental – Fort Collins
Accreditation Body License or Certification Number AIHA 214884 Alaska (AK) UST-086 Alaska (AK) CO01099 Arizona (AZ) AZ0742 California (CA) 06251CA Colorado (CO) CO01099 Florida (FL) E87914 Idaho (ID) CO01099 Kansas (KS) E-10381 Kentucky (KY) 90137 PJ-LA (DoD ELAP/ISO 170250) 95377 Louisiana (LA) 05057 Maryland (MD) 285 Missouri (MO) 175 Nebraska(NE) NE-OS-24-13 Nevada (NV) CO000782008A New York (NY) 12036 North Dakota (ND) R-057 Oklahoma (OK) 1301 Pennsylvania (PA) 68-03116 Tennessee (TN) 2976 Texas (TX) T104704241 Utah (UT) CO01099 Washington (WA) C1280
2 of 9
ADDRESS 225 Commerce Drive, Fort Collins Colorado 80524 USA PHONE +1 970 490 1511 FAX +1 970 490 1522
ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
1903038 Metals: The sample was analyzed following SW-846, 3rd Edition procedures. Analysis by Trace ICP followed method 6010D and the current revision of SOP 834. All acceptance criteria were met.
3 of 9
OrderNum: 1903038Client Name: CTL Thompson
Client Project Name: 543 Elm RoadClient Project Number: FC08777.000-221
Client PO Number:
Lab Sample Number
Client Sample Number
Matrix Date Collected
Time Collected
COC Number
Sample Number(s) Cross-Reference Table
ALS -- Fort Collins
1903038-1BLDGWASTE-1 SOLID 01-Mar-19 15:451903038-2BLDGWASTE-1 LEACHAT 01-Mar-19 15:45
Page 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 06, 2019Date Printed:LIMS Version: 6.893
ALS -- Fort Collins
4 of 9
5 of 9
6 of 9
Project: FC08777.000-221 543 Elm RoadSample ID: BLDGWASTE-1
Collection Date: 3/1/2019 15:45Matrix: LEACHATE
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Client: CTL ThompsonWork Order: 1903038
Dilution Factor
Lab ID: 1903038-2
ALS -- Fort CollinsDate: 06-Mar-19
SAMPLE SUMMARY REPORT
Percent Moisture:Legal Location:
SW6010 PrepBy: JMLPrep Date: 3/5/2019TCLP ICP MetalsLEAD 3/5/2019 13:080.04 MG/L 1ND
AR Page 2 of 3LIMS Version: 6.893
ALS -- Fort Collins7 of 9
Project: FC08777.000-221 543 Elm RoadSample ID: BLDGWASTE-1
Collection Date: 3/1/2019 15:45Matrix: LEACHATE
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Client: CTL ThompsonWork Order: 1903038
Dilution Factor
Lab ID: 1903038-2
ALS -- Fort CollinsDate: 06-Mar-19
SAMPLE SUMMARY REPORT
Percent Moisture:Legal Location:
Explanation of Qualifiers
Radiochemistry:
U or ND - Result is less than the sample specific MDC.
Y2 - Chemical Yield outside default limits.Y1 - Chemical Yield is in control at 100-110%. Quantitative yield is assumed.
W - DER is greater than Warning Limit of 1.42* - Aliquot Basis is 'As Received' while the Report Basis is 'Dry Weight'.# - Aliquot Basis is 'Dry Weight' while the Report Basis is 'As Received'.G - Sample density differs by more than 15% of LCS density.
M - Requested MDC not met.
L - LCS Recovery below lower control limit.H - LCS Recovery above upper control limit.P - LCS, Matrix Spike Recovery within control limits.N - Matrix Spike Recovery outside control limitsNC - Not Calculated for duplicate results less than 5 times MDC
B3 - Analyte concentration greater than MDC but less than Requested MDC.
B - Analyte concentration greater than MDC.
M3 - The requested MDC was not met, but the reported activity is greater than the reported MDC.
D - DER is greater than Control Limit
Inorganics:
B - Result is less than the requested reporting limit but greater than the instrument method detection limit (MDL).
E - The reported value is estimated because of the presence of interference. An explanatory note may be included in the narrative.U or ND - Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected.
M - Duplicate injection precision was not met.N - Spiked sample recovery not within control limits. A post spike is analyzed for all ICP analyses when the matrix spike and or spike duplicate fail and the native sample concentration is less than four times the spike added concentration.Z - Spiked recovery not within control limits. An explanatory note may be included in the narrative.* - Duplicate analysis (relative percent difference) not within control limits.
Organics:
U or ND - Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected.
E - Analyte concentration exceeds the upper level of the calibration range.B - Analyte is detected in the associated method blank as well as in the sample. It indicates probable blank contamination and warns the data user.
J - Estimated value. The result is less than the reporting limit but greater than the instrument method detection limit (MDL).A - A tentatively identified compound is a suspected aldol-condensation product.X - The analyte was diluted below an accurate quantitation level.* - The spike recovery is equal to or outside the control criteria used. + - The relative percent difference (RPD) equals or exceeds the control criteria. G - A pattern resembling gasoline was detected in this sample.
M - A pattern resembling motor oil was detected in this sample.D - A pattern resembling diesel was detected in this sample.
C - A pattern resembling crude oil was detected in this sample.4 - A pattern resembling JP-4 was detected in this sample.5 - A pattern resembling JP-5 was detected in this sample.H - Indicates that the fuel pattern was in the heavier end of the retention time window for the analyte of interest.L - Indicates that the fuel pattern was in the lighter end of the retention time window for the analyte of interest.Z - This flag indicates that a significant fraction of the reported result did not resemble the patterns of any of the following petroleum hydrocarbon products: - gasoline- JP-8- diesel- mineral spirits- motor oil- Stoddard solvent- bunker C
S - SAR value is estimated as one or more analytes used in the calculation were not detected above the detection limit.
- "Report Limit" is the MDC
AR Page 3 of 3LIMS Version: 6.893
ALS -- Fort Collins8 of 9
ALS -- Fort Collins 3/6/2019 11:49:Date:
Project: FC08777.000-221 543 Elm Road
Client: CTL ThompsonWork Order: 1903038
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: IP190305-2-2 Instrument ID ICPTrace2 Method: SW6010
Qual
Analysis Date: 3/5/2019 12:57
Prep Date: 3/5/2019
Analyte Result %REC
Units: MG/L
ReportLimit
Client ID:
LCS
Run ID: IT190305-1A14
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 1
Sample ID: IP190305-2
RPD Ref RPD
RPD Limit
Decision Level
5LEAD 104 80-120 200.045.2
Qual
Analysis Date: 3/5/2019 12:56
Prep Date: 3/5/2019
Analyte Result
Units: MG/L
ReportLimit
Client ID:
MB
Run ID: IT190305-1A14 DF: 1
Sample ID: EX190304-6
LEAD 0.04ND
The following samples were analyzed in this batch: 1903038-2
QC Page: 1 of 1
LIMS Version: 6.893
ALS -- Fort Collins
9 of 9
LARIMER COUNTY 543 ELM ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO CTL | T PROJECT NO. FC08777.000-221
APPENDIX D
CTL│THOMPSON CERTIFICATIONS