Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, 2010. Brussels.

12
Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, 2010. Brussels. Gerard Quinn www.nuigalway.ie/cdlp Article 33 – The Engine of the Convention

description

Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, 2010. Brussels. Gerard Quinn www.nuigalway.ie/cdlp Article 33 – The Engine of the Convention. Opening the Engine……. 1. The Purpose/ s of the Engine. 33 Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, 2010. Brussels.

Article 33 UN CRPD

Work Forum Preparatory Meeting

14 October, 2010.Brussels.

Article 33 UN CRPD

Work Forum Preparatory Meeting

14 October, 2010.Brussels.

Gerard Quinnwww.nuigalway.ie/cdlp

Article 33 – The Engine of the Convention

1. The Purpose/s of the Engine.1. The Purpose/s of the Engine.

3. 33 – Key Textual Departures Points. 3. 33 – Key Textual Departures Points.

4. Key Challenges in building the engine.4. Key Challenges in building the engine.

Opening the Engine…….Opening the Engine…….

2. 33 Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context.2. 33 Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context.

33- A Shift away from the Traditional Focus of Int HR Treaties33- A Shift away from the Traditional Focus of Int HR Treaties

1. The Purpose/s of the Engine.1. The Purpose/s of the Engine.

And to Overcome the Traditional Isolation of International Law

Window & Transmission BeltKey Vehicle to Carry the ‘New Paradigm’ of disability into domestic order

International Legal Order

Domestic Legal Order

Committee on the Rts of PWD: 34 Conference of States Parties: 40

By… Imagining a New Domestic Institutional Architecture for Change

National ImplementationFocal Point 33.1Co-ord Mechanism 33.1

National Monitoring ‘protect, promote, monitor’ 33.2

Active Consultation withPWD 33.3

Adding missing ‘Voices’To the process

Research Supporting Action

2. Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context.2. Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context.

4.3. General Obligation to Consult. Adding Voice to the Entirety of the Process.

31. Develop an evidence base to a Key Tool in the Process. Research, data.

32 (b). Obligation to contribute to capacity-building. You are not alone.

32 (c). Co-operation in research. Share ideas.

4.4. CRPD sets a floor – you can go beyond it.

9.2 & 16.3 also mention ‘monitoring’. Treat as lex specialis.

4.5. All Provisions (which must include 33) apply to all parts of Federal States

Confers a Certain Margin of Appreciation

Gvt has the Choice – but it mustbe exercised…must it consult?

Can be a Plurality – no express Criteriagiven – [e.g., authority across Gvt, effectiveness, link to int law, etc]

What does ‘due consideration mean’?

How does its role differ/overlap with‘focal point’?

3. Art 33 – Key Textual Departures Points. 3. Art 33 – Key Textual Departures Points.

Notice – focus is the Implementation of the Convention – presumably through National Law & Policy

Confers a Certain Margin of Appreciation

What are the criteria of ‘Independence’.

3 Very Different Roles

Paris Principles for NHRIs???

Framework???

Might be a plurality

‘Take into account’???

33.3. Civil society,

in particular persons with disabilities and

their representative organizations,

shall be involved and participate fully in the monitoring process. Confined to Monitoring

only???

+++Protect?

+++Promote?

4. Key Challenges in building the engine.4. Key Challenges in building the engine.

•Which Ministry…(symbolism, authority across Ministries, special case of Federal Administrations.

•Singularity or Plurality of ‘Focal Point/s’?

•Does the logic point to a National Strategy/Action Plan (to implement convention?) or link existing strategy to convention? What statistical and other ‘learning tools’ should be developed?

•Is it a Bridge between External/Internal….(role of Foreign Ministry?) External Face of Focal Point/s…to International Community.

•Clarity on Division of Labour between Focal Point/s & Coordination Mechanism.

•Does Coord mechanism simply ‘implement’ policy set by Focal Point or play other roles?

•Accountability/accessiblity of Focal Point/s to other Institutions of State.

•Interface with Civil Society, How, to what purpose…

The Focal Point/s…coordination MechanismWhat is its Essential Mission?Implement Convention…thru national law/Policy

The Focal Point/s…coordination MechanismWhat is its Essential Mission?Implement Convention…thru national law/Policy

Independent Monitoring Mechanism.Independent Monitoring Mechanism.

•What is meant by promote, protect and monitor?

•Does the Framework ‘promote, protect and monitor’ the convention via domestic law

•One or more – singular or pluralitysingular or plurality? If a plurality, how does the Framework maintain integrity and cohesion?

•What are the criteria of independence?

•Must all elements of the Framework be independent?

•Does Civil society have a say?

•Relationship of Framework to International Community. Parallel reports.

Civil Society EngagementCivil Society Engagement